Laser in infrapopliteal and popliteal stenosis 2 study (LIPS2): Long-term outcomes of laser-assisted balloon angioplasty versus balloon angioplasty for below knee peripheral arterial disease

Vessel Preparation in Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

Infrapopliteal lesions are generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease, and severe calcification. Therefore, different vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to better peri- and postprocedural outcomes. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease.

METHODS

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies published between 2000 and 2022 assessing the value of adjunctive vessel preparation in infrapopliteal arterial disease. The primary outcomes were 12-month primary patency and limb salvage.

RESULTS

A total of 1685 patients with 1913 lesions were included in 11 POBA studies. Methodological quality was assessed as poor to moderate in these studies. Only 2 studies with 144 patients assessed vessel preparation in conjunction with DCB angioplasty. These randomized trials were assessed as high quality and found no significant benefit of adjunctive atherectomy to DCB angioplasty. The pooled Kaplan-Meier estimates of 12-month primary patency and limb salvage in the POBA studies were 67.8% and 80.9% for POBA, 62.1% and 86.4% for scoring balloons, 67.9% and 79.6% for mechanical atherectomy (MA), and 79.7% and 82.6% for laser atherectomy, respectively. Within the pooled data only scoring balloons and MA demonstrated significantly improved 12-month limb salvage compared to POBA.

CONCLUSIONS

Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and MA. However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Infrapopliteal arterial disease is associated with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and generally complex to treat due to small vessel diameter, long lesion length, multilevel disease and severe calcification. A wide range of vessel preparation devices have been developed to contribute to improved peri- and postprocedural outcomes in these complex lesions. This systematic review aims to compare different vessel preparation techniques prior to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) or drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty with POBA or DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal arterial disease. Different forms of adjunctive vessel preparation demonstrate similar 12-month outcomes compared to POBA and DCB angioplasty alone in infrapopliteal disease, with the exception of improved 12-month limb salvage in scoring balloons and mechanical atherectomy (MA). However, since the included studies were heterogeneous and assessed as poor to moderate methodological quality, selection bias may have played an important role. Main conclusion is that this systematic review found no additional value of standard use of vessel preparation.

Surgical and Endovascular Therapies for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Contemporary Review

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) represents one of the most prevalent cardiovascular disease processes and carries a high burden of morbidity and mortality. Patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the most severe manifestation of PAD, have the highest rates of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality of the overall PAD population. Patients with below-the-knee (BTK) PAD have an increased propensity toward CLTI due to small-vessel caliber and the frequently comorbid conditions of end-stage renal disease and diabetes mellitus, which tend to affect small artery beds preferentially. For those with BTK PAD with CLTI, the standard of care is revascularization. Early revascularization was performed using surgical bypass. However, endovascular techniques, starting with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and expanding to the modern armamentarium of adjunctive devices and therapies, have become standard of care for most patients with CLTI due to BTK PAD. In this review, we will discuss the modern surgical and endovascular approaches to revascularization, as well as devices that are currently in development or preapproval study for the treatment of BTK PAD.

Safety and Efficacy of Excimer Laser Atherectomy Combined with a Drug-Coated Balloon in De Novo Femoral Popliteal Artery Disease: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) combined with drug-coated balloon (DCB) for de novo femoropopliteal artery disease (FPAD) is currently unknown. This case series evaluated the clinical outcomes of ELA combined with DCB in de novo FPAD from a real-world clinical perspective.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of patients treated with ELA + DCB for de novo FPAD between November 2016 and January 2020. The primary efficacy endpoint was the initial patency rate; secondary endpoints included target lesion revascularization without clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and technical success. Primary safety endpoints included all-cause death, unplanned major amputation, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 37.8 ± 25.3 months and included 56 consecutive patients (68.23 ± 8.01 years, 41 men). Forty-three patients had lifestyle-restricted claudication, and 13 patients had critical limb-threatening ischemia. The mean length of the lesion was 178.41 mm in all patients. The total lesion occlusion rate was 48.2 (n = 27), and the overall technical success rate was 100%. The 12-month, 24-month, 36-month, and 48-month primary patency rates of the ELA + DCB group were 75%, 66.1%, 58.9%, and 42.8%, respectively. Freedom from CD-TLR at 12, 24, 36, and 48 months was 83.9%, 80.3%, 76.8%, and 57.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In real-world clinical practice, ELA + DCB appears to be a safe and effective endovascular treatment for de novo FPAD, with a low rate of freedom from CD-TLR and a good patency rate.

Cool Excimer Laser-Assisted Angioplasty vs. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Arterial Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has been the conventional therapy to infrapopliteal arterial occlusion. Lately, cool excimer laser-assisted angioplasty has been proposed to be the alternate methods. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of cool excimer laser-assisted angioplasty vs. tibial balloon angioplasty in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusion.

Methods and Results

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (all up to April, 2021). All prospective and retrospective cohort studies and randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes between cool excimer laser-assisted angioplasty and tibial balloon angioplasty were included. The main endpoints were amputation-free survival (AFS), primary patency (6 months and 12 months) and free from target lesion revascularization (TLR) (3 years). Secondary outcomes included the major amputation (1 year), dissection, embolization and bailout stent. We chose the effect model according to studies' heterogeneity. A total of 122 articles were found. According to inclusion criteria, 6 papers were finally selected for the detailed evaluation. Of the 6 papers, 4 were prospective cohort studies, and 2 were retrospective studies. Compared with PTA, CELA significantly increased the rate of patency (6 months: MD 13.01, 95% CI 3.12-22.90, P < 0.05; 12 months: MD 11.88 95% CI 8.38-15.37, P < 0.05) and the rate freedom from TLR (36 months: MD 7.51 95% CI 0.63-14.40, P < 0.05). There is no statistically difference of AFS, major amputation, dissection, embolization and bailout stent between CELA group and PTA group (MD −2.82, 95% CI −8.86-3.22, P = 0.36; MD −0.17, 95% CI −1.04-0.70, P = 0.39; MD 1.11, 95% CI 0.58-2.10, P = 0.75; MD 0.46, 95% CI 0.11-1.99, P = 0.30; MD 1.89, 95% CI 0.92-3.88, P = 0.09).

Conclusions

CELA had superior clinical (freedom from TLR) and angiographic outcomes (patency rate) for infrapopliteal arterial occlusion at the same time CELA does not have increased intervention-related complications compared to PTA. However, CELA is unable to improve the patient's limb salvage rate compared with PTA.

Excimer laser atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting balloon angioplasty for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in ischemic diabetic foot: 24-month outcomes

There are few studies on excimer laser (308 nm) atherectomy in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease. The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to assess the efficacy and safety of excimer laser atherectomy (ELA) in combination with adjuvant drug-coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) compared to DCB for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in patients with ischemic diabetic foot. From September 2018 to February 2019, a total of 79 patients with diabetic foot were treated for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization at Tianjin First Central Hospital (Tianjin, China). In this project, 35 patients were treated with ELA combined with DCB angioplasty, and 44 patients were treated with DCB angioplasty. The patients' baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. The primary efficacy endpoints through 24 months were clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR), wound healing rate, major amputation rate, and target vessel patency rate. The primary safety endpoint through 24 months was all-cause mortality. The primary efficacy results at 24 months of ELA + DCB versus DCB were CD-TLR of 14.3% versus 34.1% (p = 0.044), wound healing rate of 88.6% versus 65.9% (p = 0.019), target vessel patency rate of 80.0% versus 52.3% (p = 0.010), and major amputations rate of 5.7% versus 22.7% (p = 0.036). The safety signal at 24 months of all-cause mortality rate was 2.9% for ELA + DCB group and 4.5% for DCB group (p = 0.957). ELA combined with DCB angioplasty is more effective than DCB in the treatment of infrapopliteal artery disease in patients with ischemic diabetic foot, which can improve the wound healing rate and target vessel patency rate. There was no statistical difference in the safety results between the two groups.

The IN.PACT DEEP Clinical Drug-Coated Balloon Trial: 5-Year Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the 5-year follow-up data of the IN.PACT DEEP (Randomized IN.PACT Amphirion Drug-Coated Balloon [DCB] vs. Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty [PTA] for the Treatment of Below-the-Knee Critical Limb Ischemia [CLI]) trial.

BACKGROUND

Initial studies from randomized controlled trials have shown comparable short-term outcomes of DCB angioplasty versus PTA in patients with CLI with infrapopliteal disease. However, the long-term safety and effectiveness of DCB angioplasty remain unknown in this patient population.

METHODS

IN.PACT DEEP was an independently adjudicated prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial that enrolled 358 subjects with CLI. Subjects were randomized 2:1 to DCB angioplasty or PTA. Assessments through 5 years included freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization, amputation, and all-cause death. Additional assessments were conducted to identify risk factors for death and major amputation, including paclitaxel dose tercile.

RESULTS

Freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization through 5 years was 70.9% and 76.0% (log-rank p = 0.406), and the incidence of the safety composite endpoint was 59.8% and 57.5% (log-rank p = 0.309) in the DCB angioplasty and PTA groups, respectively. The rate of major amputation was 15.4% for DCB angioplasty compared with 10.6% for PTA (log-rank p = 0.108). Given the recent concern regarding a late mortality signal in patients treated with paclitaxel-coated devices, additional analyses from this study showed no increase in all-cause mortality with DCB angioplasty (39.4%) compared with PTA (44.9%) (log-rank p = 0.727). Predictors of mortality included age, Rutherford category >4, and previous revascularization but not paclitaxel by dose tercile.

CONCLUSIONS

Tibial artery revascularization in patients with CLI using DCB angioplasty resulted in comparable long-term safety and effectiveness as PTA. Paclitaxel exposure was not related to increased risk for amputation or all-cause mortality at 5-year follow-up. (Study of IN.PACT Amphirion™ Drug Eluting Balloon vs. Standard PTA for the Treatment of Below the Knee Critical Limb Ischemia [INPACT-DEEP]; NCT00941733).

Balloon Angioplasty of Infrapopliteal Arteries: A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Optimal Endovascular Therapy

Endovascular revascularization has been increasingly utilized to treat patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), particularly atherosclerotic disease in the infrapopliteal arteries. Lesions of the infrapopliteal arteries are the result of 2 different etiologies: medial calcification and intimal atheromatous plaque. Although several devices are available for endovascular treatment of infrapopliteal lesions, balloon angioplasty still comprises the mainstay of therapy due to a lack of purpose-built devices. The mechanism of balloon angioplasty consists of adventitial stretching, medial necrosis, and dissection or plaque fracture. In many cases, the diffuse nature of infrapopliteal disease and plaque complexity may lead to dissection, recoil, and early restenosis. Optimal balloon angioplasty requires careful attention to assessment of vessel calcification, appropriate vessel sizing, and the use of long balloons with prolonged inflation times, as outlined in a treatment algorithm based on this systematic review. Further development of specific devices for this arterial segment are warranted, including devices for preventing recoil (eg, dedicated atherectomy devices), treating dissections (eg, tacks, stents), and preventing neointimal hyperplasia (eg, novel drug delivery techniques and drug-eluting stents). Further understanding of infrapopliteal disease, along with the development of new technologies, will help optimize the durability of endovascular interventions and ultimately improve the limb-related outcomes of patients with CLTI.

Current Role of Atherectomy for Treatment of Femoropopliteal and Infrapopliteal Disease

Atherectomy improves the acute procedural success of a procedure whether treating de novo or restenotic (including in-stent) disease. Intermediate follow-up results seem to be in favor of atherectomy in delaying and reducing the need for repeat revascularization in patients with femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. Recent data suggest that avoiding cutting into the external elastic lamina is an important factor in reducing restenosis. The interplay between directional atherectomy and drug-coated balloons is unclear.

Association of Race with Long-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Popliteal and Infra-Popliteal Percutaneous Peripheral Arterial Interventions

BACKGROUND

Race-related differences in clinical features, presentation, treatment and outcomes of patients with various cardiovascular diseases have been reported in previous studies. However, the long-term outcomes in black versus white patients with popliteal and/or infra-popliteal peripheral arterial disease (PAD) undergoing percutaneous peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) are not well known.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively evaluated long-term outcomes in 696 patients (263 blacks and 433 whites) who underwent PVI for popliteal and/or infra-popliteal PAD at our institution between 2007 and 2012. When compared to white patients, black patients were younger (70 ± 11 vs. 72 ± 11; P = 0.002) and had more comorbidities: higher creatinine (2.04 ± 2.08 vs. 1.33 ± 1.16; P < 0.0001) with more ESRD (19% vs. 6%; P < 0.0001) and more diabetes (64% vs. 55%; P = 0.004). At mean follow-up of 36 ± 20 months, there was no statistically significant difference between black and white patients either in all-cause mortality (29% vs. 32%; P = 0.38) or in major amputation (4.4% vs. 4.2%; P = 0.88), respectively. In a multi-variate Cox proportional hazard model, repeat ipsilateral percutaneous revascularization or bypass were lower in black patients (HR = 0.64 [95% CI 0.46-0.89]; P = 0.007) and major adverse vascular events (MAVE) were lower in black patients as well (HR = 0.7 [95% CI 0.56-0.89]; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Black patients undergoing popliteal or infra-popliteal PVI had similar mortality and major amputation, but lower repeat revascularization and MAVE compared to white patients. These data support the use of PVI in minorities despite higher baseline comorbidities and call for more research to understand the mechanisms underlying the high mortality irrespective of race.

Network meta-analysis of balloon angioplasty, nondrug metal stent, drug-eluting balloon, and drug-eluting stent for treatment of infrapopliteal artery occlusive disease

PURPOSE

We aimed to conduct a network meta-analysis of mixed treatments for the infrapopliteal artery occlusive disease.

METHODS

We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) regarding balloon angioplasty (BA), nondrug metal stent (NDMS), drug-eluting balloon (DEB), or drug-eluting stent (DES) in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Ovid, Sinomed, and other relevant websites. We selected and assessed the trials that met the inclusion criteria and conducted a network meta-analysis using the ADDIS software.

RESULTS

We included 11 relevant trials. We analyzed data of 1322 patients with infrapopliteal artery occlusive disease, of which 351 were in the NDMS vs. DES trials, 231 in the NDMS vs. BA trials, 490 in the BA vs. DEB trials, 50 in the DEB vs. DES trials, and 200 in the BA vs. DES trials. The network meta-analysis indicated that with NDMS as the reference, DES had a better result with respect to restenosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.16; 95% credible interval [CI], 1.58-18.41; probability of the best treatment, 84%) and amputation (OR, 2.50; 95% CI, 0.81-7.11; probability of the best treatment, 61%) and DEB had a better result with respect to target lesion revascularization (TLR; OR, 3.74; 95% CI, 0.78-17.05; probability of the best treatment, 57%). Moreover, with BA as the reference, NDMS had a better result with respect to technical success (OR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.00-1.15; probability of the best treatment, 86%).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis revealed that DES is a better treatment with respect to short-term patency and limb salvage rate, NMDS may provide a better technical success, and DEB and DES are good choices for reducing revascularization.

Management of Critical Limb Ischemia

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is a clinical syndrome of ischemic pain at rest or tissue loss, such as nonhealing ulcers or gangrene, related to peripheral artery disease. CLI has a high short-term risk of limb loss and cardiovascular events. Noninvasive or invasive angiography help determine the feasibility and approach to arterial revascularization. An endovascular-first approach is often advocated based on a lower procedural risk; however, specific patterns of disease may be best treated by open surgical revascularization. Balloon angioplasty and stenting form the backbone of endovascular techniques, with drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloons offering low rates of repeat revascularization. Combined antegrade and retrograde approaches can increase success in long total occlusions. Below the knee, angiosome-directed angioplasty may lead to greater wound healing, but failing this, any straight-line flow into the foot is pursued. Hybrid surgical techniques such as iliac stenting and common femoral endarterectomy are commonly used to reduce operative risk. Lower extremity bypass grafting is most successful with a good quality, long, single-segment autogenous vein of at least 3.5-mm diameter. Minor amputations are often required for tissue loss as a part of the treatment strategy. Major amputations (at or above the ankle) limit functional independence, and their prevention is a key goal of CLI therapy. Medical therapy after revascularization targets risk factors for atherosclerosis and assesses wound healing and new or recurrent flow-limiting disease. The ongoing National Institutes of Health-sponsored Best Endovascular Versus Best Surgical Therapy in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (BEST-CLI) study is a randomized trial of the contemporary endovascular versus open surgical techniques in patients with CLI.