Hemodynamic assessment in heart failure

Comparative Analysis of Heart Failure with Preserved Vs Reduced Ejection Fraction: Patient Characteristics, Outcomes, Mortality Prediction, and Machine Learning Model Development in the JoHFR

Background

Heart failure (HF) is a global health challenge affecting millions, with significant variations in patient characteristics and outcomes based on ejection fraction. This study aimed to differentiate between HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with respect to patient characteristics, risk factors, comorbidities, and clinical outcomes, incorporating advanced machine learning models for mortality prediction.

Methodology

The study included 1861 HF patients from 21 centers in Jordan, categorized into HFrEF (EF <40%) and HFpEF (EF ≥ 50%) groups. Data were collected from 2021 to 2023, and machine learning models were employed for mortality prediction.

Results

Among the participants, 29.7% had HFpEF and 70.3% HFrEF. Significant differences were noted in demographics and comorbidities, with a higher prevalence of males, younger age, smoking, and familial history of premature ASCVD in the HFrEF group. HFpEF patients were typically older, with higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity. Machine learning analysis, mainly using the Random Forest Classifier, demonstrated significant predictive capability for mortality with an accuracy of 0.9002 and an AUC of 0.7556. Other models, including Logistic Regression, SVM, and XGBoost, also showed promising results. Length of hospital stay, need for mechanical ventilation, and number of hospital admissions were the top predictors of mortality in our study.

Conclusion

The study underscores the heterogeneity in patient profiles between HFrEF and HFpEF. Integrating machine learning models offers valuable insights into mortality risk prediction in HF patients, highlighting the potential of advanced analytics in improving patient care and outcomes.

Computational modeling of heart failure in microgravity transitions

The space tourism industry is growing due to advances in rocket technology. Privatised space travel exposes non-professional astronauts with health profiles comprising underlying conditions to microgravity. Prior research has typically focused on the effects of microgravity on human physiology in healthy astronauts, and little is known how the effects of microgravity may play out in the pathophysiology of underlying medical conditions, such as heart failure. This study used an established, controlled lumped mathematical model of the cardiopulmonary system to simulate the effects of entry into microgravity in the setting of heart failure with both, reduced and preserved ejection fraction. We find that exposure to microgravity eventuates an increased cardiac output, and in patients with heart failure there is an unwanted increase in left atrial pressure, indicating an elevated risk for development of pulmonary oedema. This model gives insight into the risks of space flight for people with heart failure, and the impact this may have on mission success in space tourism.

Echocardiography for Volume Assessment in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background Errors caused by improper volume estimation increase acute mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We aimed to determine volume status in AMI patients using echocardiography and to correlate the findings with clinical outcomes. Methods This cross-sectional, single-center study was performed at a tertiary care center in India between August 2017 and September 2020 involving AMI patients. We performed echocardiography for all patients. Parameters such as left ventricle (LV) and atrium size, LV end-diastolic pressure, inferior vena cava (IVC) size and size variation, velocity stroke volume, and velocity time integral variation were measured. B-lines were recorded by scanning 32 regions on the anterior chest in the supine position using cardiac probes of echocardiography. Results A total of 184 patients were enrolled in the study with male predominance (82.1%). The mean age of patients was 58.2 ± 10.7 years. Dilated (>2.1 cm) and collapsible (<50%) IVC, and B-lines were significantly associated with heart failure (HF) (p<0.001; r=0.87 and p<0.001; r=0.74, respectively). The area under receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve to diagnose HF at a cut-off value of >10 for B-lines was 0.897 (0.842-0.951). AUROC curve for IVC size in diagnosing hypovolemia was 0.063 (0.000-0.130). Conclusions Volume status based on IVC size and B-lines detected by echocardiography has a strong prognostic value in AMI patients and should be included in the routine assessment of these patients.

Pressure-based beat-to-beat right ventricular ejection fraction and Tau from continuous measured ventricular pressures in COVID-19 ARDS patients

We evaluated pressure-based right ventricular ejection fraction (RVEF) and diastolic isovolumetric relaxation time constant (Tau) from continuously (up to 30 days) invasive measured right ventricular pressures in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We retrospectively calculated beat-to-beat ejection fraction from right ventricular pressures and dp/dt maximum and minimum in 39 patients treated between October 1st, 2020 and June 30th, 2021. After performing a stepwise logistic regression with survival as a dependent variable, we divided the patients into survivors and nonsurvivors based on their 60-day mortality. Independent outcome variables were the values of RVEF and Tau over time after insertion of the right ventricular probe along with right ventricular systolic and diastolic pressures (RVSP) and the estimated pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (ePAD). RVEF increased significantly over time in the survivors (estimate: 0.354; 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.18-0.53; p < 0.001) but remained unchanged in the nonsurvivors. Tau increased significantly in the nonsurvivors (estimate: 0.001; 95% CI: 0.0004-0.0018; p < 0.002) but not in the survivors. On the last measurement day, RVSP and ePAD were significantly lower while RVEF was significantly higher in the survivors compared to the nonsurvivors. In COVID-19 ARDS patient's, calculation of beat-to-beat RVEF and Tau from continuously invasive measured right ventricular pressures seems to unravel contrary trends in RVEF with an increase in the surviving and a decrease in the nonsurviving patients. Tau remained unchanged in the surviving but increased in the nonsurviving patients over time.

High-output Cardiac Failure: A Forgotten Phenotype in Clinical Practice

INTRODUCTION

The knowledge on High-Output Cardiac Failure (HOCF) has greatly improved in the last two decades. One of the advances was the identification of a new phenotype of HOCF, characterized by the absence of ventricular dilation, already associated with liver disease, Arteriovenous Fistulas (AVF), lung disease, myelodysplastic syndromes, and obesity. However, it has been noted that any aetiology can present with one of the two phenotypes, depending on the evolution.

OBJECTIVE

The study aims to describe, through an integrative review, the physiopathology and aetiologies of HOCF and to discuss phenotypes associated with this condition.

METHODS

Revisions, guidelines, case-controls, cohort studies and clinical studies were searched in MEDLINE and LILACS, using the connectives in the "cardiac output, high" database (MeSH Terms) OR "high cardiac output" (All Fields).

DISCUSSION

Two distinct phenotypes are currently described in the HOCF, regardless of the aetiology: 1) one with enlarged cardiac chambers; and 2) with normal heart chambers. The mechanisms related to HOCF are vasodilation, arteriovenous shunts that cause increased microvascular density, Reduced Systemic Vascular Resistance (RSVR), and high metabolism. These mechanisms lead to activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sodium and water retention, activation of neprilysin, of the sodium-glucose-2 transporter, which promote interstitial fibrosis, ventricular remodeling and a consequent increase in cardiac output >8L/min.

CONCLUSION

Many aetiologies of HOCF have been described, and some of them are potentially curable. Prompt recognition of this condition and proper treatment may lead to better outcomes.

Inotropes in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: Not Only Palliative Care

Patients with advanced heart failure suffer from severe and persistent symptoms, often not responding disease-modifying drugs, a marked limitation of functional capacity and poor quality of life that can ameliorate with inotropic drugs therapy. In small studies, pulsed infusions of classical inotropes (ie, dobutamine and milrinone) are associated with improvement in hemodynamic parameters and quality of life in patients with advanced heart failure. However, because of the adverse effects of these drugs, serious safety issues have been raised. Levosimendan is a calcium-sensitizing inodilators with a triple mechanism of action, whose infusion results in hemodynamic, neurohormonal, and inflammatory cytokine improvements in patients with chronic advanced HF. In addition, levosimendan has important pleiotropic effects, including protection of myocardial, renal, and liver cells from ischemia-reperfusion injury, and anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects; these properties possibly make levosimendan an "organ protective" inodilator. In clinical trials and real-world evidence, infusion of levosimendan at fixed intervals is safe and effective in patients with advanced HF, alleviating clinical symptoms, reducing hospitalizations, and improving the quality of life. Therefore, the use of repeated doses of levosimendan could represent the therapy of choice as a bridge to transplant/left ventricular assist device implantation or as palliative therapy in patients with advanced heart failure.

Continuous long-term wireless measurement of right ventricular pressures and estimated diastolic pulmonary artery pressure in patients with severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome

Aims

We continuously monitored right ventricular pressures and the estimated diastolic pulmonary artery pressure (ePAD) for up to 30 days in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome in order to detect and treat right ventricular and pulmonary artery hypertension.

Methods and Results

We retrospectively evaluated right ventricular pressures and the ePAD measured in 30 invasively ventilated COVID‐19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients between 1 October 2020 and 31 March 2021. We divided the patients into two groups, survivors and non‐survivors based on their 60 day mortality. Primary outcome variables were the values of right ventricular pressures and the ePAD over time after insertion of the right ventricular probe.

Right ventricular systolic pressure [RVSP, (IQR; 25th to 75th percentile)] was significantly lower on the first and the last measurement day in the survivors compared with the non‐survivors [Day 1: 38 (27–45) vs. 46 (44–49), P = 0.036; last day: 36 (27–44) vs. 51 (40–57) mmHg, P = 0.006]. 16/22 survivors and 7/8 non‐survivors received sildenafil orally, one survivor received additionally inhaled nitric oxide and one survivor and one non‐survivor each inhaled iloprost. On the last measurement day, both right ventricular pressure amplitude [31 (26–37) vs. 38 (35–47) mmHg, P = 0.027] and ePAD [22 (16–26) vs. 31 (23–34) mmHg, P = 0.043] were significantly lower in the survivors compared with the non‐survivors. Four patients in the survivor group developed excessive high RVSP in the course of their disease (peak: 57/61/78/105 mmHg). After sildenafil 20 mg every 8 h, additional inhaled nitric oxide (20 ppm) in one and additional inhaled iloprost 20 μg every 4 h in another patient RVSP consecutively decreased substantially in all four patients until the end of the measurement period (47/23/42/47 mmHg).

Conclusions

The RVSP and right ventricular pressure amplitude both were significantly lower in the survivors compared with those in the non‐survivors with a significant decrease in RVSP over time in the survivors suggesting successful lowering by pulmonary vasodilators. The ePAD as an indicator of left heart failure was significantly higher in non‐survivors compared to the surviving patients.

Volume Balance in Chronic Kidney Disease: Evaluation Methodologies and Innovation Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Patients affected by chronic kidney disease are at a risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Body fluids unbalance is one of the main characteristics of this condition, as fluid overload is highly prevalent in patients affected by the cardiorenal syndrome.

SUMMARY

We describe the state of the art and new insights into body volume evaluation. The mechanisms behind fluid balance are often complex, mainly because of the interplay of multiple regulatory systems. Consequently, its management may be challenging in clinical practice and even more so out-of-hospital. Availability of novel technologies offer new opportunities to improve the quality of care and patients' outcome. Development and validation of new technologies could provide new tools to reduce costs for the healthcare system, promote personalized medicine, and boost home care. Due to the current COVID-19 pandemic, a proper monitoring of chronic patients suffering from fluid unbalances is extremely relevant. Key Message: We discuss the main mechanisms responsible for fluid overload in different clinical contexts, including hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and heart failure, emphasizing the potential impact provided by the implementation of the new technologies.