Practical guide to prevention of contrast-induced acute kidney injury after percutaneous coronary intervention

Absolute zero-contrast percutaneous coronary interventions: An intravascular ultrasound-guided case series and literature review

PURPOSE

Contrast media (CM)-associated adverse effects including mainly acute kidney injury and hypersensitivity reactions still remain a significant treatment burden to vulnerable patients requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The complete omission of CM administration accompanied by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance may offer an appropriate revascularization treatment.

METHODS

We hereby present a case series of four patients with challenging coronary lesions and relative/absolute contraindications to CM use [(hypersensitivity reaction owning to CM, history of contrast-induced acute kidney injury, solitary kidney, or advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD)] who underwent absolute zero-contrast IVUS-guided PCI following a predetermined protocol.

RESULTS

The initial diagnostic angiography was reviewed for landmark identification, and multiple guidewires created a metallic road map providing additional landmarks and protected side branches. IVUS imaging was performed to determine lesion length, reference segments and landing zones, assess stent expansion/apposition and identify major complications. All procedures were successfully completed without any CM administration, renal function deterioration, pericardial effusion, or stent edge dissection.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated the feasibility of absolute zero-contrast IVUS-guided PCI in patients with complex coronary lesions susceptible to CM-associated adverse effects. Since the safety of this strategy is well-documented in patients with CKD and challenging lesions morphology even in acute settings, evidence-based validation of this approach is capable of changing the otherwise conservative treatment of vulnerable patients where even minimum doses of CM may have detrimental effects.

SUMMARY FOR THE ANNOTATED TABLE OF CONTENTS

Patients with vulnerable renal function as well as former hypersensitivity reaction to contrast media encounter a significant treatment burden regarding coronary artery disease. Zero-contrast IVUS-guided strategy based on a predetermined protocol provides a feasible alternative approach in patients susceptible to contrast media-associated adverse effects even in the presence of complex coronary lesions.

A risk score model of contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients with emergency percutaneous coronary interventions

Background

The previously built score models of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) were principally founded on selective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) cases. Our study was to form a risk score model of CI-AKI and make a temporal validation in a population who underwent emergency PCIs.

Methods

We included patients who underwent emergency PCIs from 2013 to 2018 and divided them into the derivation and validation cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was harnessed to create the risk model. In this research, we defined CI-AKI as an increase in serum creatinine (SCr) ≥0.5 mg/dL (44.2 μmol/L) above baseline within seven days following exposure to contrast medium.

Results

A total of 3564 patients who underwent emergency PCIs were enrolled and divided into the derivation (2376 cases) and validation cohorts (1188 cases), with CI-AKI incidence of 6.61 and 5.39%, respectively. By logistic analysis, the CI-AKI risk score model was constituted by 8 variables: female (1 point), history of transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke (1 point), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) classification (1 point per class), big endothelin-1 (ET-1) classification (1 point per class), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) classification (1 point per class), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) application (1 point), left anterior descending (LAD) stented (1 point), and administration of diuretic (2 points). The patients could be further divided into three groups: low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups, in accordance with the risk scores of 3–6, 7–10, and ≥11 points, and to the CI-AKI rates of 1.4, 11.9, and 42.6%. The CI-AKI risk score model performed well in discrimination (C statistic = 0.787, 95% CI: 0.731–0.844) and calibration ability, and showed a superior clinical utility.

Conclusion

We developed a simple CI-AKI risk score model which performs well as a tool for CI-AKI prediction in patients who underwent emergency PCIs.

Clinical impact of noncontrast percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome

PURPOSE

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is one of the common serious complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). This study aimed to assess the significance of noncontrast strategy in the setting of ACS.

METHODS

CI-AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine of ?0.5 mg/dL or ?1.25 times from the baseline. One-year worsening renal function (WRF) was defined as an increase of ?0.3mg/dL in serum creatinine from the baseline after PCI.

RESULTS

Of 250 ACS patients, 81 were treated with noncontrast PCI. The average doses of contrast medium in the noncontrast and conventional groups were 17 (9?22) ml and 150 (120?200) ml, respectively. CI-AKI was observed in 4 patients (5%) in the noncontrast group and 29 patients (17%) in the conventional group. Noncontrast PCI was associated with a lower incidence of CI-AKI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.26;95% confidence interval [CI], 0.08?0.82). The bootstrap method and inverse probability weighting led to similar results. CI-AKI was associated with a higher incidence of 1-year WRF (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.30;95% CI, 1.12?4.69), while noncontrast PCI was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Noncontrast PCI was associated with the lower incidence of CI-AKI in ACS patients. J. Med. Invest. 69 : 57-64, February, 2022.

Repurposing of Medicines in the EU: Launch of a Pilot Framework

Repurposing of authorised medicines has been under discussion for a long time. Drug repurposing is the process of identifying a new use for an existing medicine in an indication outside the scope of the original approved indication. Indeed, the COVID-19 health crisis has brought the concept to the frontline by proving the usefulness of this practise in favour of patients for an early access to treatment. Under the umbrella of the Pharmaceutical Committee and as a result of the discussions at the European Commission Expert Group on Safe and Timely Access to Medicines for Patients (STAMP) a virtual Repurposing Observatory Group (RepOG) was set up in 2019 to define and test the practical aspects of a pilot project thought to provide support to “not-for-profit” stakeholders generating or gathering data for a new therapeutic use for an authorised medicine. The group's initial plan was impacted by the outbreak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the launch of the pilot needed to be postponed. This article describes the progress and the activities conducted by the group during this past and yet extraordinary 2020–2021 to keep the project alive and explores on the background of this topic together with the obvious opportunities this health crisis has brought up in terms of repurposing of medicines.

Elevated TyG Index Predicts Incidence of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Retrospective Cohort Study in NSTE-ACS Patients Implanted With DESs

BACKGROUND

Triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index is a reliable and specific biomarker for insulin resistance and is associated with renal dysfunction. The present study sought to explore the relationship between TyG index and the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients implanted with drug-eluting stents (DESs).

METHODS

A total of 1108 participants were recruited to the study and assigned to two groups based on occurrence of CIN. TyG index was calculated as ln [fasting triglycerides (mg/dL) × fasting blood glucose (mg/dL)/2]. Baseline characteristics and incidence of CIN were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between TyG index and CIN.

RESULTS

The results showed that 167 participants (15.1%) developed CIN. Subjects in the CIN group had a significantly higher TyG index compared with subjects in the non-CIN group (8.9 ± 0.7 vs. 9.3 ± 0.7, P<0.001). TyG index was significantly correlated with increased risk of CIN after adjusting for confounding factors irrespective of diabetes mellitus status and exhibited a J-shaped non-linear association. Subgroup analysis showed a significant gender difference in the relationship between TyG index and CIN. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the risk assessment performance of TyG index was superior compared with other single metabolic indexes. Addition of TyG index to the baseline model increased the area under the curve from 0.713 (0.672-0.754) to 0.742 (0.702-0.782) and caused a reclassification improvement of 0.120 (0.092-0.149).

CONCLUSION

The findings from the present study show that a high TyG index is significantly and independently associated with incidence of CIN in NSTE-ACS patients firstly implanted with DESs. Routine preoperative assessment of TyG index can alleviate CIN and TyG index provides a potential target for intervention in prevention of CIN.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury After Coronary Angiography and Intervention

Contrast-associated acute kidney injury has multiple definitions, but is generally described as worsening renal function after administration of iodinated contrast media. It is associated with high in-hospital mortality and poor long-term survival. Furthermore, patients undergoing coronary angiography commonly have comorbidities such as hypertension or congestive heart failure, which are often treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. Trials assessing the effects of these renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents on the subsequent development of contrast-associated acute kidney injury have shown conflicting data, suggesting both beneficial and harmful effects. Therefore, there are no clear guidelines on whether clinicians should discontinue renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system-blocking agents peri-procedurally. In this article, we review the data from trials assessing the effects of peri-procedural renin-angiotensin system-blocking agent use in patients undergoing coronary and peripheral angiography and intervention. Future studies will likely focus on the extent of damage or potential benefit of these agents on renal function, cardiac function, as well as morbidity and mortality. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to recommend discontinuation of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors prior to coronary angiography.