Association between right ventricular dysfunction and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

A mathematical model to assess the effects of COVID-19 on the cardiocirculatory system

Impaired cardiac function has been described as a frequent complication of COVID-19-related pneumonia. To investigate possible underlying mechanisms, we represented the cardiovascular system by means of a lumped-parameter 0D mathematical model. The model was calibrated using clinical data, recorded in 58 patients hospitalized for COVID-19-related pneumonia, to make it patient-specific and to compute model outputs of clinical interest related to the cardiocirculatory system. We assessed, for each patient with a successful calibration, the statistical reliability of model outputs estimating the uncertainty intervals. Then, we performed a statistical analysis to compare healthy ranges and mean values (over patients) of reliable model outputs to determine which were significantly altered in COVID-19-related pneumonia. Our results showed significant increases in right ventricular systolic pressure, diastolic and mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and capillary wedge pressure. Instead, physical quantities related to the systemic circulation were not significantly altered. Remarkably, statistical analyses made on raw clinical data, without the support of a mathematical model, were unable to detect the effects of COVID-19-related pneumonia in pulmonary circulation, thus suggesting that the use of a calibrated 0D mathematical model to describe the cardiocirculatory system is an effective tool to investigate the impairments of the cardiocirculatory system associated with COVID-19.

The Effect of Pulmonary Hypertension on Mortality and Intensive Care Unit Admission in Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIM

Severe COVID-19 can cause acute respiratory distress syndrome, hypoxia, systemic complications, and increased mortality. Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a major global health issue associated with worsening symptoms and increased mortality. This systematic review aimed to assess the influence of PH onset among COVID-19 patients on all-cause mortality and intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

METHOD

An unrestricted search of five databases up to June 2022 was undertaken. Pulmonary hypertension was assessed using transthoracic echocardiogram, computed tomography, or right heart catheterisation. After duplicate screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment, random effects meta-analyses of odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed for all-cause mortality and ICU admission.

RESULTS

From the 26 studies that were included (3,373 patients, 76% males, median age 62.6 years), PH in COVID-19 patients was significantly associated with higher odds for all-cause mortality (26 studies; OR 3.89; 95% CI 2.85-5.31; p<0.001) and higher odds for ICU admission (six studies; OR 2.50; 95% CI 1.69-3.70; p<0.001). Meta-regression/subgroup analyses by patient demographics, comorbidities, or therapeutic regimens, and sensitivity analyses did not find any differences.

CONCLUSION

Evidence from observational studies indicates that PH in COVID-19 patients is associated with increased odds of mortality and ICU admission.

Optimal positive end-expiratory pressure reduces right ventricular dysfunction in COVID-19 patients on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A retrospective single-center study

While mechanical ventilation practices on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) are variable, most institutions utilize a lung rest strategy utilizing relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The effect of PEEP titration using esophageal manometry during VV ECMO on pulmonary and cardiac function is unknown. This was a retrospective study of 69 patients initiated on VV ECMO between March 2020 through November 2021. Patients underwent standard PEEP (typically 10 cm H₂O) or optimal PEEP (PEEP titrated to an end-expiratory transpulmonary pressure 0-3 cm H₂O) throughout the ECMO run. The optimal PEEP strategy had higher levels of applied PEEP (17.9 vs. 10.8 cm H₂O on day 2 of ECMO), decreased incidence of hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction (4.55% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.0001), and higher survival to decannulation (72.7% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.022). Survival to discharge did not reach statistical significance (27% vs. 11%, p = 0.211). In univariate logistic regression analysis, optimal PEEP was associated with less hemodynamically significant RV dysfunction with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.27, p = 0.0008) and increased survival to decannulation with an OR of 3.39 (95% CI 1.23-9.79), p = 0.02), though other confounding factors may have contributed.

Multimodality Cardiac Imaging in COVID

Infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID, is associated with numerous potential secondary complications. Global efforts have been dedicated to understanding the myriad potential cardiovascular sequelae which may occur during acute infection, convalescence, or recovery. Because patients often present with nonspecific symptoms and laboratory findings, cardiac imaging has emerged as an important tool for the discrimination of pulmonary and cardiovascular complications of this disease. The clinician investigating a potential COVID-related complication must account not only for the relative utility of various cardiac imaging modalities but also for the risk of infectious exposure to staff and other patients. Extraordinary clinical and scholarly efforts have brought the international medical community closer to a consensus on the appropriate indications for diagnostic cardiac imaging during this protracted pandemic. In this review, we summarize the existing literature and reference major societal guidelines to provide an overview of the indications and utility of echocardiography, nuclear imaging, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of cardiovascular complications of COVID.

Relationship between hyponatremia at hospital admission and cardiopulmonary profile at follow-up in patients with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection

PURPOSE

Hyponatremia occurs in about 30% of patients with pneumonia, including those with SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection. Hyponatremia predicts a worse outcome in several pathologic conditions and in COVID-19 has been associated with a higher risk of non-invasive ventilation, ICU transfer and death. The main objective of this study was to determine whether early hyponatremia is also a predictor of long-term sequelae at follow-up.

METHODS

In this observational study, we collected 6-month follow-up data from 189 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients previously admitted to a University Hospital. About 25% of the patients (n = 47) had hyponatremia at the time of hospital admission.

RESULTS

Serum [Na⁺] was significantly increased in the whole group of 189 patients at 6 months, compared to the value at hospital admission (141.4 ± 2.2 vs 137 ± 3.5 mEq/L, p < 0.001). In addition, IL-6 levels decreased and the PaO₂/FiO₂ increased. Accordingly, pulmonary involvement, evaluated at the chest X-ray by the RALE score, decreased. However, in patients with hyponatremia at hospital admission, higher levels of LDH, fibrinogen, troponin T and NT-ProBNP were detected at follow-up, compared to patients with normonatremia at admission. In addition, hyponatremia at admission was associated with worse echocardiography parameters related to right ventricular function, together with a higher RALE score.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that early hyponatremia in COVID-19 patients is associated with the presence of laboratory and imaging parameters indicating a greater pulmonary and right-sided heart involvement at follow-up.

The effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cardiac function in post-COVID-19 survivors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The longitudinal trajectories of cardiac structure and function following SARS-CoV-2 infection are unclear. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to elucidate the effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cardiac function in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) survivors after recovery. PubMed/MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and EMBASE were systematically searched for articles published up to 1st August 2022. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to calculate the pooled effects size and 95% confidence interval of each outcome. A total of 21 studies including 2394 individuals (1436 post-COVID-19 cases and 958 controls) were included in the present meta-analysis. The pooled analyses compared with control groups showed a significant association between post-COVID-19 and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF), LV end-diastolic volume (LV EDV), LV stroke volume (LV SV), mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), global longitudinal strain, right ventricular EF (RV EF), RV EDV, RV ESV, RV SV, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and increased LV mass. Subgroup analysis based on the severity of COVID-19 in the acute phase and subsequent chronic outcomes revealed that LV EF, MAPSE, RV EF, and RV ESV only decreased in studies including patients with a history of intensive care unit admission. Cardiac impairment after SARS-CoV-2 infection persisted in recovered COVID-19 patients even after 1 year. Future studies are warranted to determine the biological mechanisms underlying the long-term cardiovascular consequences of COVID-19.

Identification précoce des phénotypes cardiovasculaires chez les patients en insuffisance respiratoire aiguë au cours de la première pandémie Covid-19

Objectif : L'objectif principal était de comparer la prévalence de la dysfonction ventriculaire gauche (VG) et/ ou droite (VD) des patients admis au service d'urgence (SU) avec une insuffisance respiratoire aiguë (IRA) secondaire ou non à une pneumopathie à Covid-19.

Méthodes : Pendant un mois, nous avons inclus (24/7) de façon prospective les patients de l'unité de Covid-19 du SU qui présentaient une IRA. Pour chaque patient, un test RT-PCR, une tomodensitométrie thoracique et une échographie cardiaque de niveau 2 et pulmonaire étaient systématiquement réalisés avant toute intervention thérapeutique. Chaque patient était classé selon les phénotypes cardiovasculaires suivants : insuffisance VG, insuffisance VD, hypovolémie ± hyperkinésie et profil hémodynamique normal.

Résultats : Parmi les 517 patients admis pendant la période d'étude, 78 présentaient une IRA (15 %) et 62 ont bénéficié d'une échocardiographie de niveau 2 (âge : 73 ± 14 ans ; SpO2 : 90 ± 4 % ; lactate : 2,1 ± 1,3 mmol/l). Le diagnostic de la Covid-19 a été établi pour 22 patients (35 %). L'insuffisance VG (15 [38 %] vs 2 [9 %] ; p = 0,016) et celle VD (12 [30 %] vs 1 [5 %] ; p = 0,018) étaient plus souvent observées dans le groupe témoin que chez les patients ayant une pneumopathie à Covid-19. Inversement, les patients Covid-19 avaient plus fréquemment un profil hémodynamique normal ou une hypovolémie associée ou non à une vasoplégie (20 [91 %] vs 21 [53 %] ; p = 0,002). La mortalité intrahospitalière était de 18 % ( n = 11). Tous les patients atteints de la Covid-19 présentant une insuffisance VG et/ou VD précoce sont décédés pendant leur hospitalisation.

Conclusions : La dysfonction VG et celle VD étaient plus fréquentes chez les patients non atteints de la Covid-19, alors que les patients atteints de Covid-19 avaient un phénotype cardiovasculaire normal ou hypovolémique.

Cardiac dysfunction and mortality in critically ill patients with COVID-19: A Swedish multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and importance of cardiac dysfunction in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Sweden is not yet established. The aim of the study was to assess the prevalence of cardiac dysfunction and elevated pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), and its influence on mortality in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care in Sweden.

METHODS

This was a multicentre observational study performed in five intensive care units (ICUs) in Sweden. Patients admitted to participating ICU with COVID-19 were examined with echocardiography within 72 h from admission and again after 4 to 7 days. Cardiac dysfunction was defined as left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction <50% and/or regional hypokinesia) or right ventricular (RV) dysfunction (defined as TAPSE <17 mm or visually assessed moderate/severe RV dysfunction).

RESULTS

We included 132 patients, of whom 127 (96%) were intubated. Cardiac dysfunction was found in 42 (32%) patients. Most patients had cardiac dysfunction at the first assessment (n = 35) while a few developed cardiac dysfunction later (n = 7) and some changed type of dysfunction (n = 3). LV dysfunction was found in 21 and RV dysfunction in 19 patients, while 5 patients had combined dysfunction. Elevated PAP was found in 34 patients (26%) and was more common in patients with RV dysfunction. RV dysfunction and elevated PAP were independently associated with an increased risk of death (OR 3.98, p = .013 and OR 3.88, p = .007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Cardiac dysfunction occurs commonly in critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Sweden. RV dysfunction and elevated PAP are associated with an increased risk of death.

Right Ventricular Assessment in Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients and its Prognostic Importance

Background; Cardiac injury is a prevalent complication and is associated with worse prognosis in COVID-19 patients. The increased cardiac workload resulting from respiratory failure and hypoxemia is a common mechanism of cardiac injury and the right ventricle may bear the brunt of its impact. The aim of the present study was to determine the incidence and prognostic value of RV dysfunction in COVID-19 patients admitted to ICU using conventional echocardiography parameters.Patients were subjected to full history taking, and clinical examination, Computed Tomography of chest was done for all patients to assess severity of lung infiltration, all patients received standard treatment according to Ministry of Health and Population COVID19 treatment protocol recommendations. Echocardiographic assessment was done to all patients.The mean age of the patients was 61.10±9.64years (range 42-80years).There were 36 (60%) male and 24 (40%) female. The non-survivor group consisted of 28 patients (46.7%) and survivors consisted of 32 patients (53.3%). There was statistically significant association between mortality and RV function  regarding TAPSE, FAC%, RV basal diameter and EPAP. We concluded that in COVID-19 patients, RV function must be assessed and its prognostic importance recognized. RV dysfunction is not only a symptom of high pulmonary pressures, but it also contributes to cardiac insufficiency.

Association between right ventricular dysfunction and mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

There is limited evidence about the prognostic utility of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). We assessed the association between RVD and mortality in COVID‐19 patients. We searched electronic databases from inception to February 15, 2021. RVD was defined based on the following echocardiographic variables: tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid S′ peak systolic velocity, fractional area change (FAC), and right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain (RVFWLS). All meta‐analyses were performed using a random‐effects model. Nineteen cohort studies involving 2307 patients were included. The mean age ranged from 59 to 72 years and 65% of patients were male. TAPSE (mean difference [MD], −3.13 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], −4.08–−2.19), tricuspid S′ peak systolic velocity (MD, −0.88 cm/s; 95% CI, −1.68 to −0.08), FAC (MD, −3.47%; 95% CI, −6.21 to −0.72), and RVFWLS (MD, −5.83%; 95% CI, −7.47–−4.20) were significantly lower in nonsurvivors compared to survivors. Each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08–1.37), 1% decrease in FAC (aHR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.04–1.14), and 1% increase in RVFWLS (aHR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.19–1.48) were independently associated with higher mortality. RVD was significantly associated with higher mortality using unadjusted risk ratio (2.05; 95% CI, 1.27–3.31), unadjusted hazard ratio (3.37; 95% CI, 1.72–6.62), and adjusted hazard ratio (aHR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.52–4.96). Our study shows that echocardiographic parameters of RVD were associated with an increased risk of mortality in COVID‐19 patients.