A phase II study of weekly docetaxel plus capecitabine for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Single-Agent Capecitabine in Inoperable Gallbladder Cancer with Jaundice Post-Single-System Single-Catheter External Biliary Drainage: a Pilot Study from a Highly Endemic Area

Gallbladder cancer (CaGB) in the subcontinent belongs to low socioeconomic status, and at the time of diagnosis, a large number is unresectable or inoperable so the palliative treatment remains the only option. In the present study, attempt was made to see the effect and safety profile of single-agent oral capecitabine in inoperable CaGB in presence of low levels of jaundice post-single-catheter transhepatic external biliary drainage. In N = 35 of inoperable jaundiced CaGB, post-biliary drainage capecitabine in low dose was started when their total bilirubin levels fell to 10 mg% or below. Post-external drainage decreased bilirubin level to < 10 mg/dl within 1-4 weeks, mean 2.37 ± 0.80 weeks. Survival was 1-6 months, mean 3.26 ± 1.46 months. Catheter patency time was 1.92 ± 0.64 months (range 0-3 months). Young age, male sex, level of jaundice at presentation, and duration of decrease in jaundice after drainage were significantly associated with progressive disease course. Poor survival was significantly associated with progressive disease course, young age, and level of jaundice at admission. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to establish that single-agent capecitabine can be safely given in CaGB in presence of jaundice.

State of the art of chemotherapy for the treatment of central nervous system metastases from non-small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without molecular drivers. Despite a low penetration of central nervous system (CNS), chemotherapy drugs demonstrated encouraging activity against CNS metastases from NSCLC. Based on the available data, chemotherapy should be considered as an important part of the multidisciplinary treatment of CNS metastases. Particularly, platinum-based regimens represent the most active combinations and pemetrexed is associated with a meaningful clinical benefit for patients with non-squamous histology. How to integrate chemotherapy and radiotherapy for newly diagnosed brain metastases (BMs) is still debated. Although flawed by some limitations, the available evidence suggests a role for upfront chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC patients with synchronous, asymptomatic BMs, thus allowing a delay of radiotherapy. Despite the introduction of modern and more effective chemotherapy, however, the prognosis of NSCLC patients with CNS metastases remains poor, especially for those with progressive BMs or leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC).

Prognostic implications of genetic variants in advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a genome-wide association study

The prognostic significance of inherited genetic variants in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unknown. In this study, we genotyped 271 817 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in 348 advanced NSCLC patients who received chemotherapy and analyzed their association with prognosis by using Cox proportional hazard regression model adjusted for known prognostic factors. Top candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected using the bootstrap re-sampling procedure. Median age of patient population was 56 years. Proportions of female, never smokers and adenocarcinoma were 64.9, 67.5 and 80.4%, respectively. We identified 17 top candidate SNPs related to prognosis using cut-off minimum P value of <5.0 × 10(-5) in at least 70% of 1000 bootstrap samples. These SNPs were located in the genomic regions of the FAM154A, ANKS1A, DLST, THSD7B, NCOA2, CDH8, SLC35D2, NALCN and EGF genes. The most significant SNP, rs1571228 (9p22.1:FAM154A), was significantly associated with overall survival in dominant model [AG+GG to AA, hazard ratio (HR) of death (95% CI) = 0.53 (0.42-0.67); P = 2.025 × 10(-7)]. The SNP at 4q25:EGF, rs11098063, for which some genetic variations was previously reported to be associated with prognosis, also showed significant association with overall survival in additive model [CC versus CT versus TT, HR (95% CI) = 1.00 versus 0.61 (0.47-0.78) versus 0.39 (0.19-0.79); P = 9.582 × 10(-6)]. Survival differences according to the genotype of these SNPs were independent of sex, smoking, histology and chemotherapy regimens. These results suggested the variants at multiple genetic loci might contribute to the risk of death in advanced NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy.

A randomized phase II study of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus irinotecan plus capecitabine with or without isosorbide-5-mononitrate in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the efficacy of irinotecan/cisplatin (IP) versus irinotecan/capecitabine (IX) with or without isosorbide-5-mononitrate (ISMN) in chemo-naïve advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Initially, 74 patients were randomly assigned to either IP or IX. Given the potential benefits of ISMN on chemotherapy, the protocol was amended during the study. Subsequently, 72 patients were randomly assigned to either IP + ISMN or IX + ISMN. Patients were treated with predefined second-line therapies (docetaxel/capecitabine for IP or IP + ISMN, docetaxel/cisplatin for IX or IX + ISMN) when disease progressed.

RESULTS

A total of 146 received treatment. Response rate (RR), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 49%, 5.5 months, 14.5 months in IP; 33%, 3.3 months, 13.0 months in IP + ISMN; 30%, 4.3 months, 16.1 months in IX; and 25%, 3.4 months, 13.6 months in IX + ISMN, respectively. While IP arm showed a trend toward higher RR and longer PFS than IX arm, IX arm showed a trend toward longer OS than IP arm. No significant differences were observed between IP + ISMN and IX + ISMN.

CONCLUSION

IP showed better RR and PFS but no OS benefit when compared with IX. The addition of ISMN to IP or IX chemotherapy did not seem to improve the treatment outcome.

A phase II study of modulated-capecitabine and docetaxel in chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

INTRODUCTION

This phase II single-arm trial of docetaxel and capecitabine in previously untreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was designed to evaluate response rate of this regimen based on promising efficacy data from phase II testing in pre-treated NSCLC patients. The trial also evaluated the correlation between peripheral blood dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) expression and efficacy/toxicity.

METHODS

Patients with advanced NSCLC (metastatic, including malignant pleural effusion) without prior chemotherapy were enrolled. Baseline DPD screening was performed; patients with baseline DPD level < 0.07 nmol/min/mg protein were considered ineligible for the study. Treatment included a 28-day cycle of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, 15 and capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2)/day in divided doses on days 5-18. Overall response rate (RR) was the primary endpoint with a target RR of 50%. Correlative studies included evaluation of DPD activity levels in peripheral blood and correlation with clinical responses.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients received 86 cycles of treatment (median 3 cycles) and were evaluable for response. The RR was 18% (5 patients); RR did not meet the pre-specified efficacy endpoint and the trial was stopped. 14 patients had stable disease (SD - 50%) and 4 patients had SD >12 weeks. Median time to progression was 3.3 months (95% CI 1.5-4.6 months). Median overall survival was 10.5 months (95% CI: 3.2-15 months). Main toxicities included fatigue, stomatitis and leukopenia. DPD levels ranged from 0.06 to 0.26 nmol/min/mg. The majority of responders (4/5) had DPD levels ≤0.1 nmol/min/mg. Most of the responders (4/5) experienced grade 3 toxicities including leukopenia, dehydration, fatigue, and diarrhea. None of the patients (0/4) with higher DPD levels (> 0.2 nmol/min/mg) had a response.

CONCLUSION

The response rate for the regimen did not demonstrate sufficient activity and further study of this regimen in this setting is not indicated. Interestingly, the results suggest that low DPD expression may be associated with response to capecitabine but also with increased toxicity.

Phase II Study of S-1 Plus Either Irinotecan or Docetaxel for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with More Than Three Lines of Treatment

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of a combination treatment of S-1 plus either irinotecan or docetaxel for advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have already failed 3 or more lines of treatment.

Materials and Methods

This was a prospective single center phase II study. The eligible patients received S-1 40 mg/m² twice a day orally on days 1 though 14 combined with irinotecan 150 mg/m²on D1 only or docetaxel 35 mg/m² on D1 and D8. The treatment was repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patient refusal. The choice between the two regimens was made at the discretion of the treating physician.

Results

A total of 14 patients participated in the study. There were 3 patients with squamous cell carcinoma, 9 with adenocarcinoma, and 2 with NSCLC, NOS. Eight of the patients were male. There were 8 patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) of 1, and 6 patients with an ECOG of 2. All the patients had already been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Out of the 14 patients, 10 received irinotecan and S-1 and the other 4 received docetaxel and S-1. Twelve patients had also received pemetrexed. Disappointingly, there were no response from 2 patients with a stable disease, and therefore, as per the protocol, we stopped the study early. With a median follow-up time of 49 months, the median survival time was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval, 4.3 to 6.9 months).

Conclusion

S-1 containing doublets did not show activity in this population as a salvage treatment and further investigation cannot be recommended.

Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This phase II study assessed the response rate and toxicity profile of weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed SCCE were treated with paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 900 mg/m(2) orally twice a day on days 1-14. Treatment cycles were repeated every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2009, 32 patients were enrolled. Twelve patients were chemotherapy-naïve. Twenty patients had received prior chemotherapy including platinum-based regimens. Patients received a median of 5 cycles of treatment (range, 1-12). The response rate was 75% (95%CI; 50.5~99.5%) in the first-line and 45% (95%CI; 26.9~73.1%) in the second-line. With a median follow-up of 20.7 months, median progression-free survival was 5.2 months (95% CI, 4.0 to 6.4) for all patients and median overall survival (OS) was 11.7 months (95% CI, 5.5 to 18.0) for all patients. The median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 10.6 to 18.0) for patients receiving therapy as 1st line and 8.4 months (95% CI, 6.6 to 10.1) for those receiving as 2nd-line therapy. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 53.3% of the patients, which was the most common cause of dose reduction. G3 non-hematologic toxicity included stomatitis (9.4%), asthenia (6.3%), and hand-foot skin reaction (3.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Weekly paclitaxel and capecitabine is a highly active and well-tolerated regimen in patients with metastatic or recurrent SCCE in the first-line as well as second-line setting.

Modulation of Rad51, ERCC1, and thymidine phosphorylase by emodin result in synergistic cytotoxic effect in combination with capecitabine

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is the rate-limiting enzyme for the activation of capecitabine (pro-drug of fluorouracil), and as a useful predictor of tumor response to capecitabine-based chemotherapy. Overexpression of Rad51 and ERCC1 induce resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. Emodin, one of the main bioactive anthraquinone derivatives in the roots and rhizomes of numerous plants, possesses potent antitumor effects. Accordingly, we aimed to explore the molecular mechanism of emodin enhances the capecitabine-induced cytotoxicity through controlling Rad51, ERCC1, and TP expression in human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The results show that capecitabine increases the phosphorylation of MKK1/2-ERK1/2 and protein levels of Rad51 and ERCC1 through enhancing the protein stability. Depletion of endogenous Rad51 or ERCC1 expression by specific small interfering RNA transfection significantly increases capecitabine-induced cell death and growth inhibition. Emodin enhances the capecitabine-induced cytotoxic effects through ERK1/2 inactivation and decreasing the Rad51 and ERCC1 protein levels induced by capecitabine. Enhancement of ERK1/2 signaling by constitutively active MKK1/2 (MKK1/2-CA) results in increasing Rad51 and ERCC1 protein levels and cell viability in NSCLC cell lines treated with emodin and capecitabine. Interestingly, emodin enhances TP mRNA and protein expression in capecitabine treated NSCLC cell lines, and depletion of the TP expression decreases the cytotoxic effects induced by capecitabine and emodin. We conclude that enhancing the cytotoxicity to capecitabine by emodin is mediated by down-regulation the expression of Rad51 and ERCC1 and up-regulation TP expression.

Efficacy and safety of capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and mitomycin C in patients with pre-treated pancreatic, gallbladder, and bile duct carcinoma

PURPOSE

Preclinical data indicate the improvement of the antitumor activity of capecitabine by mitomycin C and docetaxel through upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase activity. Therefore, we have established a combination regimen of these drugs (DocMitoCape), which demonstrated preliminary activity especially in bile duct and pancreatic carcinoma.

METHODS

Here we report the safety and efficacy of the DocMitoCape regimen in pre-treated patients with gallbladder, bile duct, or pancreatic carcinoma. Treatment consisted of capecitabine (2,000 mg/m(2) days 1-14) in combination with docetaxel (40 mg/m(2) day 1) and mitomycin C (4 mg/m(2) day 1). Cycles were repeated on day 22. Toxicity was graded according to NCI-CTC criteria, and the antitumor activity was assessed by RECIST criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight pre-treated patients with a median age of 59 suffering from pancreatic, gallbladder, intra- (IHCCC) or extrahepatic (EHCCC) bile duct carcinoma were included. Eleven patients had received ≥2 lines of prior chemotherapy. A total of 183 and a median of six cycles were administered (range 1-21). The mean dose intensity was as follows (cycles 1-2/3-4; %): capecitabine 97/92, docetaxel 100/100, mitomycin C 99/100. Main adverse events grades 2/3/4 were (n): leukocytopenia 3/2/2, anemia 13/4/0, thrombocytopenia 3/1/0, nausea/vomiting 2/1/0, diarrhea 5/1/0, hand-foot-skin reaction 7/0/0. Six patients achieved partial and seven patients minor remissions, while six patients had stable disease adding to a tumor control rate of 68%. Median progression-free and overall survival was 4.5 (range 1.0-44.9) and 6.8 months (range 1.5-44.9), respectively, calculated from the start of treatment.

CONCLUSION

In all, the DocMitoCape regimen exhibited a favorable safety profile and a high rate of tumor stabilizations in patients with pre-treated gallbladder, bile duct and pancreatic carcinoma. It might be considered after failure of standard regimens in these types of cancer.

Capecitabine as salvage treatment for lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma of lung

Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC) of lung has previously demonstrated good clinical response to 5-fluorouracil containing chemotherapy regimen, similar to the observation in undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Capecitabine, which is converted into active 5-fluorouracil within tumor cells, has been found effective in colorectal, breast, and recently nasopharyngeal carcinomas. We report our experience in five patients with advanced or metastatic LELC of lung who were treated with single agent capecitabine as salvage chemotherapy. The finding of disease control in three of five patients, especially with exceptionally durable stable disease (14.8 months) in one patient, suggests the potential clinical activity of capecitabine in LELC of lung. Future studies on capecitabine-containing chemotherapy regimens in LELC of lung are warranted.

A dose escalation study of docetaxel plus capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

OBJECTIVES

Capecitabine (CAP), Oxaliplatin (OX) and Docetaxel (DOC) have shown considerable activity in a wide range of solid tumors. A phase I study was conducted in order to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of their combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients were enrolled. The patient's median age was 68 years, 15 were male, and 12 were chemo-naïve. DOC was administered on day 1 as an 1-hour (iv) infusion at a standard dose of 50 mg/m(2). OX was administered on day 1 as a 2-hour (iv) infusion at escalating doses ranging from 70-80 mg/m(2). CAP was administered orally on days 1 to 7 at escalating doses ranging from 2,000-2,750 mg/m(2) given as two daily divided doses. Treatment was repeated every two weeks.

RESULTS

Six different dose-levels were examined. At dose-level VI, two of three enrolled patients presented DLTs (one patient diarrhea and asthenia grade 3 and another grade 3 diarrhea), and thus, the recommended MTD for future phase II studies is CAP 2,750 mg/m(2) , DOC 50 mg/m(2) and OX 75 mg/m(2). A total of 121 treatment cycles were administered. Grade 3 neutropenia was observed in six (5%) treatment cycles and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in one (1%). There was no febrile episode. Grade 3 asthenia was observed in three (14%) patients, grade 3 diarrhea in four (19%), grade 3 neuropathy in one (5%), and grade 1/2 hand-foot syndrome in three (14%). Other toxicities were uncommon. There was no treatment related death. Four (29%) PRs and seven (50%) SD were observed among 14 evaluable patients. Responses were seen in patients with renal (n = 1), gastric (n = 2) and pancreatic (n = 1) cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate that CAP, DOC and OX can be safely combined at clinically relevant doses and this regimen merits further evaluation.

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel and mitomycin C in patients with pre-treated tumours: results of an extended phase-I trial

Preclinical data suggest that the anti-tumour activity of capecitabine is enhanced by taxanes and mitomycin C through up-regulation of thymidine phosphorylase (TP). Here, we studied safety and efficacy of the combination of capecitabine with docetaxel and mitomycin C. Two dose levels (DL) were investigated: capecitabine 1000 mg m(-2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, docetaxel 40 mg m(-2) i.v. day 1, mitomycin C 4 or 6 mg m(-2) i.v. day 1 (DL I or II). Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary aim was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) during the first two treatment cycles and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A total of 46 patients (pts) refractory to standard therapies were enrolled, of whom the majority had gastrointestinal tumours (n=40). 14 pts had received >/=3 lines of prior chemotherapy. At DL I, one out of six pts experienced DLT. At DL II, two out of six pts had DLT (mucositis grade 3). Thus, DL I was determined as MTD. Among a total of 37 pts treated on DL I the following toxicities were observed during cycles 1 and 2 (number of patients with grade 1/2/3/4 toxicity; NCI-CTC v. 3.0): anaemia 10/8/3/0, leucocytopenia 4/11/1/2, thrombocytopenia 0/1/2/0, diarrhoea 8/1/2/0, stomatitis/mucositis 3/3/1/0, nausea/vomiting 10/2/0/0, and hand-foot skin reaction 5/1/1/0. Of 30 pts who received at least two treatment cycles nine achieved complete or partial remissions, six pts achieved minor remissions, and seven pts had stable disease (tumour control rate 73%). Of note, four out of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer had partial remissions. In conclusion, capecitabine can safely be combined with docetaxel (40 mg m(-2)) and mitomycin C (4 mg m(-2)). The established regimen was well tolerated and the preliminary efficacy data in this heavily pre-treated patients population appears to be promising.

Docetaxel, low-dose estramustine, and doxifluridine in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Advanced prostate cancer, which is one of the most common cancers, usually progresses to hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A recent randomized trial of treatment with docetaxel demonstrated improved survival for patients with HRPC. The combination of docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (estramustine) has been reported to be effective for HRPC. Low-dose estramustine suppresses the pituitary-gonadal axis. Docetaxel plus 5-fluoro-5'-deoxyuridine (5'-dFUrd) had supra-additive cytotoxic effects on HRPC cells consistent with the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of adding 5'-dFUrd on the chemotherapy regimen, which consist docetaxel and estramustine.

METHODS

All of the HRPC patients were treated with estramustine 140 mg orally twice 5'-dFUrd 200 mg orally four times daily on days 1-21, and docetaxel 60 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1. We evaluated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurable responses, the progression-free and overall survival, and the impact on adverse effects and the quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

Of 34 patients with a median age of 72.3 years, 73% showed PSA responses and 70% showed measurable responses. The median progression-free survival was 18.0 and 5.8 months for PSA responders and non-responders and the overall survival was 19.4 months, respectively. There were few serious adverse effects. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 32.4% of the patients, and was easily managed with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection. There was no significant change in the overall QOL scores serially.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that the combined regimen is tolerable and effective in Japanese HRPC patients.

Docetaxel and Capecitabine (DC) Regimen for Solid Tumors

The increasing complexity of cancer chemotherapy increases the requirement that pharmacists be familiar with these highly toxic agents. This column will review various issues related to preparation, dispensing, and administration of cancer chemotherapy, and review various agents, both commercially available and investigational, used to treat malignant diseases.

Docetaxel-associated epiphora

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane indicated for the treatment of advanced breast, prostate, and non-small cell lung cancers; it is also used for the treatment of various other solid tumors. The standard intermittent dosage of docetaxel is 60-100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. At this dose and schedule, myelosuppression is common and neutropenia is usually the dose-limiting toxicity. Weekly administration of docetaxel 20-42 mg/m2 is being tested in the treatment of advanced solid tumors in order to improve patient tolerance by reducing the interval dose and to maintain therapeutic efficacy by increasing overall dose intensity. Asthenia and peripheral neuropathy can limit continued administration of weekly docetaxel. Epiphora (excess tearing due to narrowing or blockage of the lacrimal outflow passages) is associated with repeated weekly administration of docetaxel. This adverse effect can interfere with activities of daily life and negatively affect quality of life. Epiphora may be an underreported adverse effect of treatment because of underrecognition by clinicians and patient embarrassment with respect to seemingly uncontrolled tearing. The use of weekly docetaxel administration is expanding; therefore, patients should be educated to recognize and report signs and symptoms of epiphora. It is important for clinicians participating in the care of patients undergoing treatment with docetaxel to monitor for excess tearing and signs of eye irritation to ensure timely management of treatment-related epiphora.

A phase II trial of docetaxel plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A combination of docetaxel (T) and capecitabine (X) showed synergistic effects in preclinical studies and phase III randomized trials of metastatic breast cancer. We conducted this phase II study to examine its efficacy in previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHODS

Patient eligibility required advanced NSCLC with measurable lesion(s), at least one prior regimen failure and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2. Treatment consisted of T 36 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 1000 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle (level I) or T 30 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 625 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle (level II).

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients (M/F=24/11) were enrolled; 29 had received one prior regimen and 19 had received platinum-based regimens. Significant non-hematologic toxicities were observed after the treatment given at level I, including one treatment-related death. Subsequently 29 patients were treated at level II. The treatment at level II was well tolerated with grade 3 or 4 neutropenia only in 10%, grade 3 asthenia in 21% and stomatitis in 14% of patients. Four (15%) of 27 evaluable patients had partial response (PR) at level II and eight (30%) had stable disease (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

The TX regimen showed modest antitumor effects in patients with previously treated NSCLC. For further studies, we recommend T 30 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 plus X 625 mg/m(2) p.o. b.i.d. on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle.

A Pilot Trial of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine Plus Capecitabine in Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a pilot study of gemcitabine, vinorelbine and capecitabine combination to evaluate its toxicity and efficacy in chemo-naive patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after a short phase IB trial.

METHODS

Eligible chemo-naive patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC received outpatient administration of gemcitabine 900 mg/m2 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks, concurrently with capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 given orally twice a day on days 1 to 5 and 8 to 12 (dose level I), or days 1 to 6 and 8 to 13 (dose level II).

RESULTS

Between November 2002 and December 2003, 19 patients participated in the study at either dose level I (7 patients) or dose level II (12 patients). The maximum tolerated dose, defined as the dose at which no more than 1 of 6 patients in a cohort experienced a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle, was not established. However, 1 of 7 patients at dose level I, and 2 of 12 at dose level II experienced DLTs (ie, grade 3 hepatotoxicity in 2 patients, and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 1 patient). In addition, 2 patients experienced treatment-related pneumonitis requiring mechanical ventilator support after the second course of therapy. Objective tumor response was observed in 5 (26.3%) of 19 patients. Further patient accrual was stopped according to the study design.

CONCLUSIONS

This 3-drug combination showed disappointing antitumor activity against NSCLC with unexpected life-threatening pulmonary toxicity. No further investigation of this regimen is recommended for patients with NSCLC.

Phase II study of weekly irinotecan plus capecitabine for chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

A Phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an irinotecan plus capecitabine combination, a new nonplatinum regimen, in chemonaive patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

Between July 2003 and April 2004, 53 patients with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of NSCLC were enrolled. All but 5 patients were male, 52 (98%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1, 39 (74%) had AJCC Stage IV disease, and the median age was 61 years. Treatment consisted of intravenous irinotecan at a dose of 90 mg/m(2) on Days 1 and 8 and oral capecitabine at a dose of 1000 mg/m(2) twice daily on Days 1-14 of each 21-day cycle, given up to 12 cycles.

RESULTS

Of 53 patients enrolled, 22 achieved objective tumor responses (all partial responses) for an overall response rate of 41.5% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 28.2-54.8%). After a median follow-up of 17.4 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with a 1-year survival rate of 60.1% (95% CI, 46.9-73.4%) and a median progression-free survival of 5.1 months. Treatment was very well tolerated, with only 10% of patients experiencing NCI-CTC Grade 3 or 4 toxicities. The most common toxicities were hand-foot syndrome and diarrhea. In multiple logistic regression analysis for overall response, only the stage predicted for significantly better response (P = 0.04). Squamous cell carcinoma was marginally predictive for better response (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The irinotecan plus capecitabine regimen demonstrated an antitumor activity that is favorably comparable with other commonly used cisplatin-based regimens. Given the mild toxicity profile and favorable survival outcome, this nonplatinum regimen warrants further evaluation in a randomized trial.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Weekly Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Daily Capecitabine in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Purpose: Docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine are three active chemotherapeutic agents with different mechanisms of action. This phase I study investigated the feasibility and pharmacokinetics of this combination given on a weekly schedule.

Experimental Design: Docetaxel and cisplatin were given i.v. over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8 and capecitabine was given orally bid on days 1 to 14 (every 21 days). Escalation occurred in cohorts of three patients until the maximum tolerated dose was defined. Pharmacokinetics studies of docetaxel and total and ultrafiltrate platinum after cisplatin administration were done on cycle 1 (with capecitabine) and cycle 2 (without capecitabine).

Results: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. Two of six patients at dose level 5 had a dose-limiting infection and diarrhea. One of six evaluable patients at dose level 4 (27 mg/m2 docetaxel, 27 mg/m2 cisplatin, 825 mg/m2 capecitabine) had a dose-limiting hypomagnesemia. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were similar on cycles 1 and 2. Area under the plasma concentrations versus time curves of total platinum was significantly greater in cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 (P = 0.001). There was no difference in the disposition of docetaxel on cycles 1 and 2.

Conclusions: The recommended docetaxel, cisplatin, and capecitabine dose for phase II studies is 27/27/825 mg/m2. The alteration in total and ultrafiltrate platinum disposition on cycle 2 compared with cycle 1 may be inherent to sequential cisplatin administration; however, prior treatment with capecitabine cannot be ruled out as a factor.

Thymidine phosphorylase expression in tumour cells and tumour response to capecitabine plus docetaxel chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) is the key enzyme for capecitabine activation in tumour cells.

AIMS

To examine whether TP expression in tumour cells and stroma is predictive of the tumour response to capecitabine plus docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Tumour samples were available from 30 of 39 patients enrolled in a previous phase II study of capecitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. Stromal and tumour cell TP expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry using monoclonal antibody PD-ECGF.

RESULTS

High tumour cell TP expression was found in 13 of 30 cases and was negatively associated with stromal TP expression (p = 0.000). High stromal TP expression was found in 16 of 28 cases and was strongly associated with intense macrophage infiltration (p = 0.002), suggesting that macrophages are the major component of TP expression in the stroma. Tumour response to capecitabine/docetaxel was significantly associated with high tumour cell TP expression (p = 0.004) and low stromal TP expression (p = 0.009). Moreover, high tumour cell TP expression was significantly associated with severe hand-foot syndrome, a toxic side effect of capecitabine (p = 0.01). Improved survival was seen for high tumour cell and low stromal TP expression, although results were not significant (p = 0.6 and 0.3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In advanced NSCLC, TP expression in tumour cells and stroma is associated with tumour response to capecitabine/docetaxel chemotherapy, and might be a useful predictor of tumour response to capecitabine based chemotherapy. A large scale prospective study is needed to confirm the prognostic significance of TP expression in NSCLC.

Phase II Evaluation of Docetaxel-Modulated Capecitabine in Previously Treated Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Based on the preclinical observation of upregulation of thymidine phosphorylase, the last enzymatic step in the conversion of capecitabine to 5-fluorouracil, by docetaxel along with good clinical tolerability of the combination of docetaxel and capecitabine using an optimized schedule in a previous phase I trial, we conducted this phase II study of this combination in patients with refractory or relapsed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with NSCLC previously treated with at least one platinum- or paclitaxel-based regimen received docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 and capecitabine 625 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 5 to 18, every 4 weeks. The primary objective of the study was evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) 26 weeks from initiation of treatment.

RESULTS

Thirty-six evaluable patients received 104 cycles of the combination. Severe toxicities were infrequent with only one patient requiring toxicity-related hospitalization. The 26-week PFS rate was 25% (95% confidence interval, 12-42) with an intent to treat median survival and 1-year survival rate of 9.1 months and 37%, respectively. Among 31 patients with measurable disease (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria), eight (26%; 95% confidence interval, 12-45) achieved partial responses.

CONCLUSION

The combination of capecitabine and weekly docetaxel is well tolerated in previously treated patients with NSCLC. The relatively high 26-week PFS and 1-year survival, as well as the high response rate observed, encourages further evaluation of this regimen in NSCLC, either in randomized trials for refractory patients or as a potential treatment option for chemotherapy naive patients.

Gene expression profiling revealed novel mechanism of action of Taxotere and Furtulon in prostate cancer cells

Background

Both Taxotere and Capecitabine have shown anti-cancer activity against various cancers including prostate cancer. In combination, Taxotere plus Capecitabine has demonstrated higher anti-cancer activity in advanced breast cancers. However, the molecular mechanisms of action of Taxotere and Capecitabine have not been fully elucidated in prostate cancer.

Methods

The total RNA from PC3 and LNCaP prostate cells untreated and treated with 2 nM Taxotere, 110 μM Furtulon (active metabolite of Capecitabine), or 1 nM Taxotere plus 50 μM Furtulon for 6, 36, and 72 hours, was subjected to Affymetrix Human Genome U133A Array analysis. Real-time PCR and Western Blot analysis were conducted to confirm microarray data.

Results

Taxotere and Furtulon down-regulated some genes critical for cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, transcription factor, cell signaling, and oncogenesis, and up-regulated some genes related to the induction of apoptosis, cell cycle arrest, and differentiation in both cell lines. Taxotere and Furtulon also up-regulated some genes responsible for chemotherapeutic resistance, suggesting the induction of cancer cell resistance to these agents.

Conclusions

Taxotere and Furtulon caused the alternation of a large number of genes, many of which may contribute to the molecular mechanisms by which Taxotere and Furtulon inhibit the growth of prostate cancer cells. This information could be utilized for further mechanistic research and for devising optimized therapeutic strategies against prostate cancer.

Phase I study of weekly (day 1 and 8) docetaxel in combination with capecitabine in patients with advanced solid malignancies

PURPOSE

Capecitabine in combination with docetaxel given every 3 weeks has shown a high degree of activity in a number of tumor types, but at the expense of significant toxicity. To improve the therapeutic index, we evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel in combination with capecitabine, and determined the maximum tolerated dose, toxicities and pharmacokinetics of this combination.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced solid malignancies were treated with docetaxel on days 1 and 8, and capecitabine, twice daily on days 1-14, of an every-21-day cycle. Pharmacokinetics of docetaxel were assessed on days 1 and 8 of the first cycle of chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Enrolled in the study were 25 patients. The most frequent toxicities were asthenia, hand-foot syndrome and mucositis. Inability to deliver at least 75% of the planned doses of both drugs during the first two cycles of chemotherapy was noted at dose levels 2, 3 and 4. Dose level 1 (docetaxel 30 mg/m2 and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily) is the recommended dose for phase II studies. Five patients experienced a partial response, and eight patients had stabilization of disease. Coadministration of capecitabine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of docetaxel.

CONCLUSION

The regimen consisting of docetaxel 30 mg/m2 (days 1, 8) and capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily (days 1-14) was well tolerated. Capecitabine did not alter pharmacokinetics of docetaxel. Further testing of this regimen in tumor-specific trials, especially gastric, lung and breast cancer, is warranted.