Lymphovascular invasion as a tool to further subclassify T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma

Lymphovascular Invasion is an Independent Negative Prognostic Factor in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) has not yet been described. Potential utility as an adjunct to current staging guidelines remains unknown.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried from 2006 to 2020. Univariate and multivariable models, Kaplan Meier method, and log-rank test were used. Subgroup analyses by pN stage were conducted.

RESULTS

Of 9,689 patients, 23.2% had LVI. LVI was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio [HR] 1.401, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.307-1.502, p < 0.0001) with reduction in median survival to 20.0 months (95% CI 18.9-21.4) from 39.7 months (95% CI 37.8-42.3, p < 0.0001). Multivariable survival analysis adjusted on pN and pT stage found that patients with LVI had decreased survival in a given pN stage (p < 0.001). pN0/LVI+ patients had a similar prognosis to the higher staged pN1/LVI- (28.6 months), although pN1/LVI- patients did slightly worse (p = 0.0135). Additionally, patients with pN1/LVI+ had equivalent survival compared with pN2/LVI- (p = 0.178) as did pN2/LVI+ patients compared with pN3/LVI- (p = 0.995).

CONCLUSIONS

In these data, LVI is an independent negative prognostic factor in EAC. LVI was associated with a survival reduction similar to an upstaged nodal status irrespective of T stage. Patients with LVI may be better classified at a higher pN stage.

ANPEP/CD13 Expression as a Marker of Lymphovascular Invasion and Survival in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in early esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is associated with more aggressive disease. Molecular markers associated with LVI are still largely unknown. Using a combination of transcriptomic analysis and validation experiments, we sought to describe markers for LVI and survival.

METHODS

We performed NanoString expression profiling using RNA from 60 EAC specimens collected from surgery-only cases between 2000 and 2012. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were correlated with pathologic characteristics (T and N status and presence of LVI). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to correlate gene expression with overall survival. Expression of alanyl aminopeptidase, membrane (ANPEP)/CD13 was validated by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in EAC tissue microarray and in EAC cell lines.

RESULTS

We identified >20 up-regulated DEGs in tumor samples containing LVI. Multivariable analysis showed depth of invasion and ANPEP/CD13 expression were independently associated with overall survival, whereas nodal status was not. IHC analysis demonstrated overexpression of the ANPEP/CD13 protein in dysplastic Barrett esophagus and EAC tumors. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with higher RNA expression and strongly positive ANPEP/CD13 membrane IHC-Histoscore staining have shorter survival (P = .002). Down-regulation of ANPEP/CD13 expression by short hairpin RNA vector reduces colony formation, migration, and invasion of FLO-1 EAC cells. Overexpression of CD13 in SKGT4 EAC cells increases colony formation, motility, and invasion in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated expression of ANPEP/CD13 indicates shorter survival of EAC patients and a more invasive phenotype of cancer cells in vitro. Validation in a larger sample group is required to better understand the clinical significance of ANPEP/CD13 and other candidate genes.

Advances in diagnosis and management of cancer of the esophagus

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy worldwide, with over 470 000 new cases diagnosed each year. Two distinct histological subtypes predominate, and should be considered biologically separate disease entities.1 These subtypes are esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Outcomes remain poor regardless of subtype, with most patients presenting with late stage disease.2 Novel strategies to improve early detection of the respective precursor lesions, squamous dysplasia, and Barrett's esophagus offer the potential to improve outcomes. The introduction of a limited number of biologic agents, as well as immune checkpoint inhibitors, is resulting in improvements in the systemic treatment of locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer. These developments, coupled with improvements in minimally invasive surgical and endoscopic treatment approaches, as well as adaptive and precision radiotherapy technologies, offer the potential to improve outcomes still further. This review summarizes the latest advances in the diagnosis and management of esophageal cancer, and the developments in understanding of the biology of this disease.

Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis

Patients with early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) are increasingly having definitive local therapy endoscopically. Endoscopic resection is not able to pathologically stage or treat lymph node metastasis (LNM). Accurate identification of patients having nodal metastasis is critical to select endoscopic therapy over surgery. This study aimed to define the risk of LNM in T1 EAC. A meta-analysis of studies of patients who underwent surgery and lymphadenectomy with assessment of LNM was performed according to PRISMA. Main outcome was probability of LNM in T1a and T1b disease. Secondary outcomes were risk factors for LNM and rate of LNM in submucosal T1b (SM1, SM2, and SM3) disease. Registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022341794). Twenty cohort studies involving 2264 patients with T1 EAC met inclusion criteria: T1a (857 patients) with 36 (4.2%) node positive and T1b (1407 patients) with 327 (23.2%) node positive. Subgroup analysis of T1b lesions was available in 10 studies (405 patients). Node positivity for SM1, SM2, and SM3 was 16.3%, 16.2%, and 29.4%, respectively. T1 substage (odds ratio [OR] 7.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.45-13.38, P < 0.01), tumor differentiation (OR 2.82, 95% CI 2.06-3.87, P < 0.01), and lymphovascular invasion (OR 13.65, 95% CI 6.06-30.73, P < 0.01) were associated with LNM. T1a disease demonstrated a 4.2% nodal metastasis rate and T1b disease a rate of 23.2%. Endoscopic therapy should be reserved for T1a disease and perhaps select T1b disease, which has a moderately high rate of nodal metastasis. There were inadequate data to stratify T1b SM disease into 'low-risk' and 'high-risk' based on tumor differentiation and lymphovascular invasion.

Clinical Outcomes After Endoscopic Management of Low-Risk and High-Risk T1a Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic eradication therapy (EET) is standard of care for T1a esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). However, data on outcomes in high-risk T1a EAC are limited. We assessed and compared outcomes after EET of low-risk and high-risk T1a EAC, including intraluminal EAC recurrence, extraesophageal metastases, and overall survival.

METHODS

Patients who underwent EET for T1a EAC at 3 referral Barrett's esophagus endotherapy units between 1996 and 2022 were included. Patients with submucosal invasion, positive deep margins, or metastases at initial diagnosis were excluded. High-risk T1a EAC was defined as T1a EAC with poor differentiation and/or lymphovascular invasion, with low-risk disease being defined without these features. All pathology was systematically assessed by expert gastrointestinal pathologists. Baseline and follow-up endoscopy and pathology data were abstracted. Time-to-event analyses were performed to compare outcomes between groups.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty-eight patients with T1a EAC were included (high risk, n = 45; low risk, n = 143) with a median age of 70 years, and 84% were men. Groups were comparable for age, sex, Barrett's esophagus length, lesion size, and EET technique. Rates of delayed extraesophageal metastases (11.1% vs 1.4%) were significantly higher in the high-risk group ( P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the rates of intraluminal EAC recurrence ( P = 0.79) and overall survival ( P = 0.73) between the 2 groups.

DISCUSSION

Patients with high-risk T1a EAC undergoing successful EET had a substantially higher rate of extraesophageal metastases compared with those with low-risk T1a EAC on long-term follow-up. These data should be factored into discussions with patients while selecting treatment approaches. Additional prospective data in this area are critical.

The staging performance of a modified tumor-node-metastasis staging system incorporated with lymphovascular invasion in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is recognized as an unfavorable prognostic factor for many solid tumors. However, its staging value has not been adequately illustrated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

The clinicopathologic relevance and prognostic impact of LVI were retrospectively analyzed in 822 patients with surgically treated ESCC. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine the independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analyses stratified by pathological stages, nodal status and invasive depth were conducted using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multiple staging models based on overall survival (OS) were constructed using Cox regression and evaluated by Harrell's concordance index (C-index), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and net reclassification index (NRI).

RESULTS

LVI was detected in 24.6% of ESCC patients, and its prevalence increased with a higher pathological stage (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, LVI was found to be an independent prognostic factor for OS [Hazard ratio (HR) = 1.545, 95% CI, 1.201-1.986), and was associated with unfavorable outcomes in stage I to III ESCC, regardless of nodal status and invasive depth. The staging model that incorporated LVI as an independent factor achieved the greatest improvement in accuracy (ΔC-index: 2.9%), and the greatest added value (IDI 2.8%, p < 0.01; NRI 13.7%, p < 0.05) for prediction of OS in ESCC patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LVI can facilitate further survival stratification in ESCC patients. The adoption of LVI as an independent staging factor in the current cancer staging system should be considered and further validated.

The evolution of endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus

Barrett’s esophagus is the condition in which a metaplastic columnar epithelium replaces the stratified squamous epithelium that normally lines the distal esophagus. The condition develops as a consequence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and predisposes the patient to the development of esophageal adenocarcinoma. The diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus have undergone dramatic changes over the years and continue to evolve today. Endoscopic eradication therapy has revolutionized the management of dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus and early esophageal adenocarcinoma by significantly reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the prior gold standard of therapy, esophagectomy. The purpose of this review is to highlight current principles in the management and endoscopic treatment of this disease.

Lymphovascular invasion quantification could improve risk prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with submucosal (T1b) esophageal adenocarcinoma

Aim

To quantify lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and to assess the prognostic value in patients with pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Methods

In this nationwide, retrospective cohort study, patients were included if they were treated with surgery or endoscopic resection for pT1b esophageal adenocarcinoma. Primary endpoint was the presence of metastases, lymph node metastases, or distant metastases, in surgical resection specimens or during follow‐up. A prediction model to identify risk factors for metastases was developed and internally validated.

Results

248 patients were included. LVI was distributed as follows: no LVI (n = 196; 79.0%), 1 LVI focus (n = 16; 6.5%), 2–3 LVI foci (n = 21; 8.5%) and ≥4 LVI foci (n = 15; 6.0%). Seventy‐eight patients had metastases. The risk of metastases was increased for tumors with 2–3 LVI foci [subdistribution hazard ratio (SHR) 3.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.10–5.47] and ≥4 LVI foci (SHR 3.81, 95% CI 2.37–6.10). The prediction model demonstrated a good discriminative ability (c‐statistic 0.81).

Conclusion

The risk of metastases is higher when more LVI foci are present. Quantification of LVI could be useful for a more precise risk estimation of metastases. This model needs to be externally validated before implementation into clinical practice.

A Clinical Nomogram for Predicting Node-positive Disease in Esophageal Cancer

OBJECTIVE

We developed and validated a nomogram predicting the likelihood of occult lymph node metastases in surgically resectable esophageal cancers.

BACKGROUND

Patients with esophageal cancer with positive lymph nodes benefit from neoadjuvant therapy, but limitations in current clinical staging techniques mean nodal metastases often go undetected preoperatively.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical T1-3N0M0 cancer undergoing upfront esophagectomy from 2004 to 2014. Multivariable logistic regression was used to develop the risk model using both statistical significance and clinical importance criteria for variable selection. Predictive accuracy was assessed and bootstrapping was used for validation. A nomogram was constructed for presentation of the final model.

RESULTS

Of 3186 patients, 688 (22%) had pathologic lymph node involvement (pN+) and 2498 (78%) had pN0 status. Variables associated with pN+ status included histology [adenocarcinoma vs squamous: odds ratio (OR) 1.75], tumor stage (T1: reference, T2: OR 1.90, T3: OR 2.17), tumor size (<1 cm: reference, 1-2 cm: OR 2.25, 2-3 cm: OR 3.82, 3-4 cm: OR 5.40, 4-5 cm: OR 5.66, ≥5 cm: OR 6.02), grade (1: reference, 2: OR 2.62, 3: OR 4.39, 4: OR 4.15, X: OR 1.87), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (absent: reference, present: OR 4.70, missing: OR 1.87), all P < 0.001. A nomogram with these variables had good predictive accuracy (Brier score: 0.14, calibration slope: 0.97, c-index: 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

We created a nomogram predicting the likelihood of pathologic lymph node involvement in patients with esophageal cancer who are clinically node negative using a generalizable dataset. Risk stratification with this nomogram could improve delivery of appropriate perioperative care.

Validation of the post-neoadjuvant staging system of the American joint committee on cancer, 8th edition, in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by curative esophagectomy for localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The American Joint Committee on Cancer 8th edition staging system presents separate classifications for pTNM and post-neoadjuvant ypTNM (ypTNM-8th) to enhance prognostic prediction after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery. We aimed to validate the ypTNM-8th staging system and to compare the prognostication performance of ypTNM-8th with that of pTNM-7th and pTNM-8th in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

We reviewed 207 ESCC patients treated with nCRT between January 2007 and December 2014 and compared the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell's C-index to determine the prognostic performance of each TNM system.

RESULTS

Survival curve analysis of pTNM-7th and -8th showed a stepwise drop in survival from ypT0N0 to advanced stages, whereas the survival outcome of ypStage III showed a better prognosis than that of ypStage II according to ypTNM-8th. Lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and tumor regression grade were significantly associated with overall survival on univariate analysis. Each TNM system showed significant p-values for trend (p < 0.0001 each), but after adjusting for prognostic factors, ypTNM-8th did not significantly predict survival (p = 0.15), whereas pTNM-7th remained significant (p < 0.001). pTNM-7th incorporating ypT0N0M0 and ypT0 (is)N + M0 as separate groups was superior in prognostication as its AIC was smaller and its C-index was higher than those of pTNM-8th and ypTNM-8th, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Because ypTNM-8th did not provide sufficient prognostication for patients with ESCC treated with nCRT followed by esophagectomy, more sophisticated prognostic classification should be developed for the ypTNM staging system in these patients.

Lymphovascular Invasion as the Major Prognostic Factor in Node-Negative Esophageal Cancer After Primary Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Studies addressing both lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and perineural invasion (PNI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with or without neoadjuvant therapy are limited. We aimed to analyze the incidence and prognostic significance of LVI and PNI in patients with thoracic ESCC.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 520 patients with ESCC: 174 patients after neoadjuvant treatment followed by surgery and 346 after primary esophagectomy, from two medical centers. The relationships between LVI, PNI, and other histological factors were evaluated. The Cox regression model was used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

Positive LVI and PNI were noted in 35.6% and 22.4% of patients with residual primary tumor after neoadjuvant treatment and in 39.6% and 24.0% of patients who underwent primary esophagectomy, respectively. In patients with neoadjuvant treatments, the 5-year overall survival rates were 12.7% and 28.3% in patients with positive LVI and negative LVI, respectively (p = 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates were 6.4% and 29.9% in patients with positive PNI and negative PNI, respectively (p < 0.001). In patients who did not receive neoadjuvant treatment, the 5-year overall survival rates were 28.2% and 61.1% in patients with positive LVI and negative LVI, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year overall survival rates were 30.2% and 52.5% in patients with positive PNI and negative PNI (p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, the presence of PNI was an independent prognostic factor in patients with neoadjuvant treatments, whereas the presence of LVI had more significant prognostic impact in patients with node-negative ESCC after primary esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LVI and PNI statuses are significant prognostic factors for patients with ESCC. However, the prognostic impact of LVI was majorly in the subgroup of node-negative patients who received primary esophagectomy.

Clinical significance of lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The lymphatic flow around the esophagogastric junction is complicated. Therefore, it is unclear whether lymphatic invasion in the esophageal region (eLI) and in the gastric region (gLI) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) equally affect the incidence of lymph node metastases (LNM), and consequently, survival.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data of 175 patients with AEG between January 2008 and July 2017. Risk factors for LNM and impacts of eLI or gLI on survival outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

eLI was identified in 34% of the patients (59/175). By multivariate analysis, eLI was associated with an increased risk of both mediastinal LNM (odds ratio [OR] = 2.98, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.26-7.05) and abdominal LNM (OR = 5.44, 95% CI: 1.95-15.20). The 5-year overall survival for patients with eLI (53%) was significantly worse than for patients without eLI (76%) (hazard ratio = 2.45, 95% CI: 1.37-10.01). gLI was not selected in either of these analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Positive eLI was strongly associated with mediastinal and abdominal LNM and worse survival in patients with AEG compared with gLI. In the histopathological examination, it seems to make sense to assess eLI and gLI separately.

Relationship of lymphovascular invasion with lymph node metastasis and prognosis in superficial esophageal carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The development of tumor cells inside the lymphatics or blood vessels is known as lymphovascular invasion (LVI). The correlation between LVI, lymph node metastasis (LNM), and the diagnosis of superficial esophageal carcinoma (SEC) remains unclear.

Methods

We searched Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for prospective articles to better understand the relationship between LVI, LNM, and SEC diagnosis.

Results

We included 23 articles containing data for 4749 patients (range: 54–598) in our meta-analysis. The hazard ratio between LVI and overall survival (OS) was 1.85 with 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.10–3.11, P = 0.02). LNM rate was higher in SEC patients with LVI than SEC patients without LVI (univariate: OR = 4.94, 95% CI: 3.74–6.53, P < 0.0001; multivariate: OR = 5.72, 95%CI: 4.38–7.4, P < 0.0001). No obvious publication was found.

Conclusions

The results indicate that LVI plays a dominant role in the prognosis of LNM in SEC and in the prognostic prediction for SEC.

The prognostic role of angiolymphatic invasion in N0 esophageal carcinoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Angiolymphatic invasion (ALI) plays an important role in lymph node metastasis. The presence of an ALI predicts a high risk for lymph node metastasis and a poor prognosis in patients with lymph node negative esophageal carcinoma. The independent prognostic value of ALI in node-negative patients remains controversial. A meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between ALI and prognosis in cases of lymph node negative esophageal carcinoma.

Methods

We searched the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases for studies on the relationship between ALI and the prognosis of patients with esophageal carcinoma. Studies with N0 patients' survival data related to ALI were included. The effect size (ES) was the hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

A total of 9 studies with 2,154 patients were included after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The pooled HR showed that patients with ALI have a poor cancer specific survival (HR =2.54; 95% CI, 1.84-3.51; P<0.001), a poor overall survival (HR =2.84; 95% CI, 2.17-3.72; P<0.001) and a short disease free survival (HR =2.84; 95% CI: 1.85-4.37; P<0.001).

Conclusions

ALI could be used as an indicator for identifying high-risk patients with lymph node-negative esophageal carcinoma and can be used as an indicator for sub-stages in further stage classification.

Prognostic value of lymphovascular invasion in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Whether lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) should be considered an independent prognostic factor for survival is controversial. The aim of this report was to investigate the prognostic value of LVI for patients with ESCC.

Methods

Between October 2010 and July 2011, 152 ESCC patients were retrospectively reviewed. All of the patients underwent curative resection as their primary treatment. Clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS) rate were investigated. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to calculate the OS rate, and the prognostic factors were identified by Cox regression model.

Results

Positive LVI was found in 49 (32.2%) patients. Patients with negative LVI had a significantly better 5-year OS rate than those with positive LVI (52.9% vs. 28.8%; P=0.000). The age, T stage, N stage, tumor differentiation, and LVI were demonstrated to be significant prognostic factors for OS through univariate analyses. LVI was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for OS through multivariate survival analyses. Subgroup analyses revealed that LVI was associated with a decreased OS in node-negative patients, and no significant difference was observed in node-positive cases.

Conclusions

Our study highlighted that LVI is an independent prognostic factor in patients with resectable ESCC. LVI may facilitate the stratification of patients with poor survival.

Accuracy of Clinical Staging and Outcome With Primary Resection for Local-Regionally Limited Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of clinical staging, to assess survival with surgical resection alone, and to determine factors associated with understaging in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma thought to have limited local-regional disease.

BACKGROUND

Primary surgical resection is the preferred treatment in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma clinically staged to have limited nodal disease. This approach requires reliable clinical staging.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of all patients who had primary esophagectomy for clinical stage T1-3 N0-1 adenocarcinoma (seventh edition AJCC) from January 2002 to May 2013. Clinical and pathologic stages were compared and overall survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 88 patients who met inclusion criteria. Final pathology confirmed appropriate clinical staging (≤T3N1) in 76% of patients (67/88). There were 21 patients who were understaged (>T3N1), and in all cases, understaging was based on the presence of advanced nodal (N2 or N3) disease. Factors independently associated with understaging were the presence of dysphagia, tumor length >3 cm, and poor differentiation. At a median follow-up of 35 months, 63% of all patients (55/88) remain alive. The 5-year survival in correctly staged patients was 67%, compared with 33% for those who were understaged (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Modern clinical staging will accurately identify the majority of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma and limited local-regional disease (≤pT3N1). Survival with surgery alone in correctly staged patients was excellent and unlikely to be improved with neoadjuvant therapy. A combination of dysphagia, poor differentiation, and tumor length >3 cm was associated with understaging in 92% of patients. Patients with these factors are likely to have more advanced disease than clinically suspected and may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy before resection.

Poorer prognosis associated with simultaneous lymphatic and vascular invasion in patients with squamous carcinoma of the thoracic oesophagus

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to demonstrate the cumulative influence of simultaneous lymphatic and vascular invasion in thoracic oesophageal squamous carcinoma after radical operation.

METHODS

A total of 598 cases with thoracic oesophageal squamous carcinoma that were cured by radical open oesophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy in the period of 2002 to 2014 were included. An association of the status of lymphovascular invasion with clinicopathological factors and a recurrent pattern was illustrated. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated, and the risk factors for decreased disease-free survival were determined with Kaplan-Meier subset analyses and Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

The status of lymphovascular invasion was significantly associated with tumour differentiation ( P  = 0.045) and the pathological tumour, node and metastasis stage ( P  < 0.001), which includes the tumour intramural invasive depth (T parameter) as well as regional (N parameter) and distant (M parameter) lymph node involvement. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival and postoperative disease-free survival were significantly decreased by lymphatic or vascular invasion alone ( P  < 0.001) and were further decreased by simultaneous lymphatic and vascular invasion ( P  < 0.001). The independent risk factors that predicted reduced disease-free survival were the following: T parameter ( P  < 0.001, odds ratio: 1.436), N parameter ( P  < 0.001, odds ratio: 1.838) and the status of lymphovascular invasion ( P  < 0.001, odds ratio: 1.568). Simultaneous lymphatic and vascular invasion were significantly correlated with postoperative early recurrence ( P  = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Simultaneous lymphatic and vascular invasion independently has a more adverse effect on prognosis than lymphatic or vascular invasion alone. Differentiating between lymphatic and vascular invasion is recommended in order to further study the role of lymphovascular invasion in cancer staging and prognostication in multicentre prospective studies.

Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma -retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a new index recently introduced to predict the risk of nutrition-related complications and mortality. Our aim is to examine the association between the GNRI and long-term prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent esophagectomy.

METHODS

The present study enrolled consecutive 216 patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy. The GNRI at admission to the hospital was calculated as follows: (1.489 × albumin, g/l) + (41.7 × present/ideal body weight). The characteristics and long-term prognosis were compared between four groups: the severe risk (GNRI: <82), moderate risk (GNRI: 82 to <92), low risk (GNRI: 92 to <98) and no risk (GNRI: >98) groups. The 5-year overall survival and independent prognostic factors were investigated, respectively.

RESULTS

A decreased GNRI significantly correlated with unfavorable overall survival (p < 0.001). In all patients, a multivariate analysis demonstrated that the severe and moderate risk groups (GNRI: <92) (hazard ratio 0.50; p = 0.002), T factor (≥T2) (hazard ratio 0.52; p = 0.026), and N positive factor (hazard ratio 0.47; p = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors. In the subgroup analysis, which excluded patients with preoperative chemoradiotherapy, the severe and moderate risk groups (GNRI: <92) (hazard ratio 0.48; p = 0.0057), and T factor (≥T2) (hazard ratio; p = 0.021) were independent prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

GNRI is considered to be a useful prognostic factor in patients with ESCC undergoing esophagectomy.

Surgical Treatment of High-Grade Dysplasia and Early Esophageal Cancer

BACKGROUND

The treatment of early-stage esophageal cancer and high-grade dysplasia of the esophagus has changed significantly in recent years. Many early tumors that were traditionally treated with esophagectomy can now be resected with endoscopic therapy alone. These new endoscopic modalities can offer similar survival outcomes without the associated morbidity of a major operation. However, a number of these cases may still require surgical intervention as the best treatment option.

METHODS

The current scientific literature, national and international guidelines were reviewed for recommendations regarding optimal treatment of early esophageal malignancy.

RESULTS

The primary advantage of surgery over endoscopic treatment lies in the reduced risk of recurrence as well as the ability to assess harvested lymph nodes for regional disease. We recommend that esophageal tumors that have invaded into the submucosa (T1b) or beyond should be treated with an esophagectomy. In addition, dysplastic lesions and cancers that demonstrate poorly differentiated pathology or lymphovascular or perineural invasion should be surgically resected. Finally, large tumors, multifocal lesions, tumors within a long segment of Barrett's esophagus, tumors adjacent to a hiatal hernia, tumors that cannot be resected enbloc with endoscopic techniques should also be treated with an esophagectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed at high-volume centers in experienced hands, esophagectomy can have consistently good outcomes for high-grade dysplasia and early esophageal cancers, and should be considered as a treatment option.

Strategies of nodal staging of the TNM system for esophageal cancer

The 8^th edition of UICC/AJCC TNM staging for esophageal cancer will start in use since 2018. The nodal staging in this version of TNM system remains unchanged from the 7^th edition that based on the number of lymph nodes (LN) involved, except the limited revision of the regional LN map. In this review, N staging revision was evaluated from its initially simple definition of negative (N0) and positive (N1) LN(s) to the current positive node number based proposal. Meanwhile the disadvantages of current N staging were discussed. The refined nodal staging system in view of the number of metastatic node stations was introduced; as well as the extent and station of metastatic node could better reflect the disease progression and prognosis. The controversy on N staging of esophagogastric junction cancer was also discussed. Other reported N staging associated elements including LN ratio and lymphatic vessel invasion were reviewed and evaluated.

Comparative effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation in clinical stage T2N0 esophageal cancer: A decision analysis

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effectiveness of upfront esophagectomy versus induction chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy for overall survival in patients with clinical T2N0 (cT2N0) esophageal cancer. We also assessed the influence of the diagnostic uncertainty of endoscopic ultrasound on the expected benefit of chemoradiation.

METHODS

We created a decision analysis model representing 2 treatment strategies for cT2N0 esophageal cancer: upfront esophagectomy that may be followed by adjuvant therapy for upstaged patients and induction chemoradiation for all patients with cT2N0 esophageal cancer followed by esophagectomy. Parameter values within the model were obtained from published data, and median survival for pathologic subgroups was derived from the National Cancer Database. In sensitivity analyses, staging uncertainty of endoscopic ultrasound was introduced by varying the probability of pathologic upstaging.

RESULTS

The baseline model showed comparable median survival for both strategies: 48.3 months for upfront esophagectomy versus 45.9 months for induction chemoradiation and surgery. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated induction chemoradiation was beneficial, with probability of upstaging > 48.1%, which is within the published range of 32% to 65% probability of pathologic upstaging after cT2N0 diagnosis. The presence of any of 3 key variables (size larger than 3 cm, high grade, or lymphovascular invasion) was associated with > 48.1% risk of upstaging, thus conferring a survival advantage to induction chemoradiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The optimal treatment strategy for cT2N0 esophageal cancer depends on the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging. High-risk features that confer increased probability of upstaging can inform clinical decision making to recommend induction chemoradiation for select cT2N0 patients.

Outcome with Primary En-bloc Esophagectomy for Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma can be reliably treated endoscopically. Controversy exists about the use of endotherapy versus esophagectomy for submucosal tumors. Increasingly endotherapy is considered for submucosal tumors in part because of the presumed high mortality with esophagectomy and the perceived poor prognosis in patients with nodal disease. This study was designed to assess survival following primary en bloc esophagectomy (EBE) in patients with submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC).

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent EBE for submucosal EAC between 1998 and 2015. No patient had neoadjuvant therapy.

RESULTS

There were 32 patients (28M/4F; median age 64 years). The median tumor size was 1.5 cm (0.4-8.0), and the median number of resected nodes was 48 (23-85). There was one perioperative death. Lymph node metastases were present in 7 patients (22%). There was one involved node in four patients and 2, 3, and 31 nodes in one patient each. The one N3 patient received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 87 months. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 84 and 70% respectively. Disease-specific survival at 10 years was 90%. Eight patients died, but only three deaths (9%) were related to EAC. Disease-specific survival at 10 years in node-positive patients was 71%.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival after primary en bloc esophagectomy for submucosal adenocarcinoma was excellent even in node-positive patients. Mortality with esophagectomy was low and far less than the 22% risk of node metastases in patients with submucosal tumor invasion. Esophagectomy should remain the preferred treatment for T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Current Concepts in Treatment of Barrett's Esophagus With and Without Dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Around 10-15% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease will develop Barrett's esophagus (BE). The development of novel endoscopic modalities has changed the management of BE in the last decade.

AIM

The aim of this study was to review the current evidence for the treatment of BE with and without dysplasia.

RESULTS

In patients with BE without dysplasia, antireflux surgery should not be suggested as a modality to prevent the malignant transformation of BE, but its indications should be the same as for other patients with gastroesophageal reflux. Endoscopic surveillance at intervals of 3-5 years is recommended for these patients. For patients with BE with low-grade dysplasia, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is the preferred treatment modality, while endoscopic surveillance every 12 months is an acceptable alternative in patients with life-limiting comorbidities. For most patients with BE and high-grade dysplasia, RFA is the preferred treatment strategy. Patients with intramucosal adenocarcinoma (T1a), should be treated with EMR followed by ablative therapy, in order to eradicate the remaining intestinal metaplasia. Endoscopic resection may be suitable for low-risk T1b tumors (well-differentiated, without lymphovascular invasion, and with superficial submucosal invasion); however, further data are necessary to better risk stratify this group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with BE without dysplasia should undergo endoscopic surveillance every 3-5 years. Endoscopic ablative therapy (RFA) is the preferred treatment modality for dysplastic BE. Patients with T1a adenocarcinoma should be treated with EMR followed by ablative therapy. Low-risk T1b tumors may be suitable for endoscopic resection.

A Model Based on Pathologic Features of Superficial Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Complements Clinical Node Staging in Determining Risk of Metastasis to Lymph Nodes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

It is important to identify superficial (T1) gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas (EAC) that are most or least likely to metastasize to lymph nodes, to select appropriate therapy. We aimed to develop a risk stratification model for metastasis of superficial EAC to lymph nodes using pathologic features of the primary tumor.

METHODS

We collected pathology data from 210 patients with T1 EAC who underwent esophagectomy from 1996 through 2012 on factors associated with metastasis to lymph nodes (tumor size, grade, angiolymphatic invasion, and submucosal invasion). Using these variables, we developed a multivariable logistic model to generate 4 categories for estimated risk of metastasis (<5% risk, 5%-10% risk, 15%-20% risk, or >20% risk). The model was validated in a separate cohort of 39 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of superficial EAC and subsequent esophagectomy, with node stage analysis.

RESULTS

We developed a model based on 4 pathologic factors that determined risk of metastasis to range from 2.9% to 60% for patients in the first cohort. In the endoscopic resection validation cohort, higher risk scores were associated with increased detection of lymph node metastases at esophagectomy (P = .021). Among patients in the first cohort who did not have lymph node metastases detected before surgery (cN0), those with high risk scores (>20% risk) had 11-fold greater odds for having lymph node metastases at esophagectomy compared with patients with low risk scores (95% confidence interval, 2.3-52 fold). Increasing risk scores were associated with reduced patient survival time (P < .001) and shorter time to tumor recurrence (P < .001). Patients without lymph node metastases (pT1N0) but high risk scores had reduced times of survival (P < .001) and time to tumor recurrence (P = .001) after esophagectomy than patients with pT1N0 tumors and lower risk scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic features of primary superficial EACs can be used, along with the conventional node staging system, to identify patients at low risk for metastasis, who can undergo endoscopic resection, or at high risk, who may benefit from induction or adjuvant therapy.

Clinical and histologic determinants of mortality for patients with Barrett's esophagus-related T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Superficial (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) commonly is treated by endoscopic resection, yet little is known about factors that predict outcomes of this approach. We assessed clinical and histologic variables associated with the overall survival times of patients with T1 EAC who received therapy.

METHODS

In a retrospective analysis, we collected data from patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for T1 EAC (194 patients with T1a and 75 patients with T1b) at the Mayo Clinic, from 1995 through 2011. EMR specimens were reviewed systematically for depth of invasion, presence of lymphovascular invasion, grade of differentiation, and status of resection margins. Kaplan-Meier curves and proportional hazards regression models were used in statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Demographic characteristics were similar between patients with T1a and T1b EAC. Overall survival at 5 years after EMR was 74.4% for patients with T1a (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.6%-81.8%) and 53.2% for patients with T1b EAC (95% CI, 40.3%-70.1%). Of surviving patients with T1a EAC, 94.1% remained free of cancer (95% CI, 89.8%-98.5%), and 94.7% of surviving patients with T1b EAC remained free of cancer (95% CI, 85.2%-100%). A multivariable model associated older age (per 10-year increment), evidence of lymphovascular invasion, and deep margin involvement with reduced overall survival in patients with T1 EAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic assessment of EMR specimens can help predict mortality and potentially guide treatment options for patients with T1 EAC.

Analysis of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion biomarkers in T1 esophagogastric adenocarcinomas for improved patient prognostication

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in T1 esophagogastric adenocarcinoma may predict risk of recurrence despite definitive treatment with surgery or endoscopic resection. Podoplanin and CD34 are emerging biomarkers of lymphatic and blood vessel invasion, respectively, and could be adopted to refine LVI assessment. A consecutive series of 65 patients with T1 adenocarcinomas diagnosed at Nottingham University Hospitals were investigated. T1 tumors from 43/65 patients who received primary surgery only were suitable for LVI evaluation by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining as well as by CD34 and Podoplanin immunohistochemistry. LVI was correlated to clinicopathological features and recurrence free survival. H&E staining detected LVI in 11.6% (5/43) of T1 tumors. CD34 and Podoplanin immunohistochemistry significantly improved LVI detection to 25.6% (11/43). Compared with LVI by H&E, immunohistochemical evaluation of blood vessel invasion (CD34) or lymphatic vessel invasion (Podoplanin) was significantly associated with higher grade (P = 0.005), submucosal invasion (T1b) (P = 0.018), lymph node positivity (N1) (P = 0.029) and poor recurrence free survival (P = 0.0003). Our study provides evidence that CD34 and Podoplanin immunohistochemistry could improve LVI detection and allow better prognostication of patients and optimum selection of definitive treatment. Larger multicenter studies are required for further validation that could have significant clinical implications.

Endoscopic options for early stage esophageal cancer

Surgery has traditionally been the preferred treatment for early stage esophageal cancer. Recent advances in endoscopic treatments have been shown to be effective and safe. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allow endoscopists to remove small, superficial lesions, providing tumor specimen that can be examined for accurate pathologic tumor staging and assessment of adequacy of resection. Endoscopic ablation procedures, including photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radio frequency ablation (RFA), have also been shown to safely and effectively treat esophageal dysplasia and early stage neoplasia, with excellent long-term disease control. Both approaches are becoming more widely available around the world, and provide an alternative, safe, low risk strategy for treating early stage disease, making combined endoscopic therapy the recommended treatment of choice for early stage esophageal cancers.

Tumor budding is associated with an increased risk of lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma

The treatment approach for superficial (stage T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma critically depends on the pre-operative assessment of metastatic risk. Part of that assessment involves evaluation of the primary tumor for pathologic characteristics known to predict nodal metastasis: depth of invasion (intramucosal vs submucosal), angiolymphatic invasion, tumor grade, and tumor size. Tumor budding is a histologic pattern that is associated with poor prognosis in early-stage colorectal adenocarcinoma and a predictor of nodal metastasis in T1 colorectal adenocarcinoma. In a retrospective study, we used a semi-quantitative histologic scoring system to categorize 210 surgically resected, superficial (stage T1) esophageal adenocarcinomas according to the extent of tumor budding (none, focal, and extensive) and also evaluated other known risk factors for nodal metastasis, including depth of invasion, angiolymphatic invasion, tumor grade, and tumor size. We assessed the risk of nodal metastasis associated with tumor budding in univariate analyses and controlled for other risk factors in a multivariate logistic regression model. In all, 41% (24 out of 59) of tumors with extensive tumor budding (tumor budding in ≥3 20X microscopic fields) were metastatic to regional lymph nodes, compared with 10% (12 out of 117) of tumors with no tumor budding, and 15% (5 out of 34) of tumors with focal tumor budding (P<0.001). When controlling for all pathologic risk factors in a multivariate analysis, extensive tumor budding remains an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma associated with a 2.5-fold increase (95% CI=1.1-6.3, P=0.039) in the risk of nodal metastasis. Extensive tumor budding is also a poor prognostic factor with respect to overall survival and time to recurrence in univariate and multivariate analyses. As an independent risk factor for nodal metastasis and poor prognosis after esophagectomy, tumor budding should be evaluated in superficial (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma as a part of a comprehensive pathologic risk assessment.

Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 416 consecutive patients with ESCC who underwent surgical resection following nCRT at the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 1998 and 2008. After exclusion of patients with non-R0 resection or showing no residual tumor (ypT0Nx), the histological tumor sections of 231 patients were reviewed for LVI. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

LVI was observed in 85 patients (36.8 %). The presence of LVI was related to close circumferential resection margins (CRMs), a greater depth of invasion, poor tumor differentiation, and an increased occurrence of lymph node metastases (LNM). The 5 year OS was significantly lower (10 %) in patients with LVI than in those without (31 %; p < 0.001). By multivariate Cox regression analyses, LVI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.5; p = 0.002) and LNM (HR 1.6; p = 0.007) were identified as independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. The 5 year OS rates according to the number of risk factors present were 35, 21, 20, and 5 for LVI(-)LNM(-), LVI(+)LNM(-), LVI(-)LNM(+), and LVI(+)LNM(+) patients, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of LVI is independently associated with shorter OS in ESCC patients receiving nCRT. Links between LVI and LNM may provide new clues for the prognostic stratification of esophageal cancer.

Strategies to improve outcomes in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is one of the fastest rising cancers in Western society. Incidence has increased by 600% within the last 30 years. Rates of diagnosis and death run parallel due to the poor prognosis and a lack of effective treatments. Potentially curative treatments are followed by high rates of disease recurrence. For the majority of patients, who present with advanced disease, we have no effective treatment. We discuss the key areas of progress in this demanding field and offer our views on the direction of future research and treatment.

Perioperative epidural analgesia reduces cancer recurrence after gastro-oesophageal surgery

BACKGROUND

Recent interest has focused on the role of perioperative epidural analgesia in improving cancer outcomes. The heterogeneity of studies (tumour type, stage and outcome endpoints) has produced inconsistent results. Clinical practice also highlights the variability in epidural effectiveness. We considered the novel hypothesis that effective epidural analgesia improves cancer outcomes following gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery in patients with grouped pathological staging.

METHODS

Following institutional approval, a database analysis identified 140 patients, with 2-year minimum follow-up after gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery. All patients were operated on by a single surgeon (2005-2010). Information pertaining to cancer and survival outcomes was extracted.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis demonstrated a 1-year 14% vs. 33% (P = 0.01) and 2-year 27% vs. 40% [hazard ratio (HR)=0.59; 95% CI, 0.32-1.09, P = 0.087] incidence of cancer recurrence in patients with (vs. without) effective (> 36 h duration) epidural analgesia, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated increased time to cancer recurrence (HR = 0.33; 95% CI: 0.17-0.63, P < 0.0001) and overall survival benefit (HR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.21-0.83, P < 0.0001) at 2-year follow-up following effective epidural analgesia. Subgroup analysis identified epidural-related cancer recurrence benefit in patients with oesophageal cancer (HR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.16-0.75, P = 0.005) and in patients with tumour lymphovascular space infiltration (LVSI), (HR = 0.49; 95% CI: 0.26-0.94, P = 0.03). Effective epidural analgesia improved estimated median time to death (2.9 vs. 1.8 years, P = 0.029) in patients with tumour LVSI.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found an association between effective post-operative epidural analgesia and medium-term benefit on cancer recurrence and survival following oesophageal surgery. A prospective study that controls for disease type, stage and epidural effectiveness is warranted.

Endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms: A systematic review

AIM: To investigate potential therapeutic recommendations for endoscopic and surgical resection of T1a/T1b esophageal neoplasms.

METHODS: A thorough search of electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed and Cochrane Library, from 1997 up to January 2011 was performed. An analysis was carried out, pooling the effects of outcomes of 4241 patients enrolled in 80 retrospective studies. For comparisons across studies, each reporting on only one endoscopic method, we used a random effects meta-regression of the log-odds of the outcome of treatment in each study. “Neural networks” as a data mining technique was employed in order to establish a prediction model of lymph node status in superficial submucosal esophageal carcinoma. Another data mining technique, the “feature selection and root cause analysis”, was used to identify the most important predictors of local recurrence and metachronous cancer development in endoscopically resected patients, and lymph node positivity in squamous carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) separately in surgically resected patients.

RESULTS: Endoscopically resected patients: Low grade dysplasia was observed in 4% of patients, high grade dysplasia in 14.6%, carcinoma in situ in 19%, mucosal cancer in 54%, and submucosal cancer in 16% of patients. There were no significant differences between endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the following parameters: complications, patients submitted to surgery, positive margins, lymph node positivity, local recurrence and metachronous cancer. With regard to piecemeal resection, ESD performed better since the number of cases was significantly less [coefficient: -7.709438, 95%CI: (-11.03803, -4.380844), P < 0.001]; hence local recurrence rates were significantly lower [coefficient: -4.033528, 95%CI: (-6.151498, -1.915559), P < 0.01]. A higher rate of esophageal stenosis was observed following ESD [coefficient: 7.322266, 95%CI: (3.810146, 10.83439), P < 0.001]. A significantly greater number of SCC patients were submitted to surgery (log-odds, ADC: -2.1206 ± 0.6249 vs SCC: 4.1356 ± 0.4038, P < 0.05). The odds for re-classification of tumor stage after endoscopic resection were 53% and 39% for ADC and SCC, respectively. Local tumor recurrence was best predicted by grade 3 differentiation and piecemeal resection, metachronous cancer development by the carcinoma in situ component, and lymph node positivity by lymphovascular invasion. With regard to surgically resected patients: Significant differences in patients with positive lymph nodes were observed between ADC and SCC [coefficient: 1.889569, 95%CI: (0.3945146, 3.384624), P < 0.01). In contrast, lymphovascular and microvascular invasion and grade 3 patients between histologic types were comparable, the respective rank order of the predictors of lymph node positivity was: Grade 3, lymphovascular invasion (L+), microvascular invasion (V+), submucosal (Sm) 3 invasion, Sm2 invasion and Sm1 invasion. Histologic type (ADC/SCC) was not included in the model. The best predictors for SCC lymph node positivity were Sm3 invasion and (V+). For ADC, the most important predictor was (L+).

CONCLUSION: Local tumor recurrence is predicted by grade 3, metachronous cancer by the carcinoma in-situ component, and lymph node positivity by L+. T1b cancer should be treated with surgical resection.

Cause of death during long-term follow-up for superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term prognosis and cause of death in patients with superficial esophageal adenocarcinoma (SEAC) after surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 85 patients without adjuvant or neoadjuvant treatment underwent surgery for SEAC (pT1N0-1, M0) 1984-2011. Medical records and causes of death were reviewed, and 79 specimens (93 %) were reanalyzed for cancer penetration. Survival was calculated according to Kaplan-Meier and comparisons of survival with log-rank test. Multivariate survival was analyzed with Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 85 patients, 36 had transhiatal, 33 transthoracic en bloc, 6 minimally invasive en bloc, 5 vagal sparing esophageal resection and 5 endoscopic mucosal resections; 7 patients (8 %) had lymph node metastasis (LNM). Cancer penetration: 35 pT1a and 44 pT1b. Overall survival was 67 % at 5 years and 50 % at 10 years. Disease-specific survival was 82 % at 5 years and 78 % at 10 years. Recurrence-free survival was 80 % at 5 years. In a Cox multivariate model, poor overall survival was predicted only by LNM. Cumulative mortality during median follow-up of 5 years (0-25 years): 37 of 85 (44 %). Cause of death of these 37: SEAC recurrence for 15 (41 %), postoperative complications for 4 (11 %), another primary malignancy for 5 (14 %), non-cancer-related for 11 (30 %) and for 2 (5 %) cause unknown. Mortality after 5-year follow-up: 11 (30 %); 82 % of these deaths were unrelated to SEAC recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

With SEAC recurrence as the single most common cause of death, disease-specific 5-year survival was good. Overall and late (> 5-year) survival is affected by diseases related to aging.

Current treatment options for the management of esophageal cancer

In recent years, esophageal cancer characteristics and management options have evolved significantly. There has been a sharp increase in the frequency of esophageal adenocarcinoma and a decline in the frequency of squamous cell carcinoma. A more comprehensive understanding of prognostic factors influencing outcome has also been developed. This has led to more management options for esophageal cancer at all stages than ever before. A multidisciplinary, team approach to management in a high volume center is the preferred approach. Each patient should be individually assessed based on type of cancer, local or regional involvement, and his or her own functional status to determine an appropriate treatment regimen. This review will discuss management of esophageal cancer relative to disease progression and patient functional status.

Does endoscopic treatment for early oesophageal cancers give equivalent oncological outcomes as compared with oesophagectomy? Best evidence topic (BET)

A best evidence topic was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early oesophageal cancer gives equivalent oncological outcomes as compared to oesophagectomy. A total of 340 papers were found using the reported searches of which 7 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date, journal, study type, population, main outcome measures and results are tabulated. Oesophagectomy with lymph node dissection for early oesophageal cancer is the standard to which every other treatment modality is compared to. However, the associated mortality and morbidity rates highlight the need for the development of effective, less invasive procedures. The evidence from the present review supports the use of EMR in this context as a first line treatment in T1a (mucosal) oesophageal cancer. The trade-off is a higher recurrence rate which can be dealt with successfully using a tight follow-up schedule and retreatment. The higher rates of lymph node involvement in T1b (submucosal) cancers preclude the use of endoscopic treatment in this setting except for patients unfit for surgery.

High-grade dysplasia and intramucosal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: the role of esophagectomy in the era of endoscopic eradication therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this review is to evaluate the role of esophagectomy for high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC) in light of recent advances in endoscopic therapy for Barrett's esophagus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are proven well tolerated and effective, at least in midterm follow-up. The application of these techniques has opened a new road for the local treatment of esophageal HGD and IMC. To safely employ these techniques, reliable and accurate staging of the esophageal neoplasm is essential. EMR has taken a central role, as it allows the pathologist to provide tumor-staging information necessary for an appropriate clinical management decision process. Unfortunately, both RFA and EMR have limitations that preclude their universal use in the treatment of early esophageal cancer. In some cases, esophagectomy still remains the best treatment option. The evolution of the minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy may improve outcomes of this major operation.

SUMMARY

A better understanding of the indications and limitations of endoscopic therapy for HGD and IMC permits a tailored approach to the management of patients with early esophageal adenocarcinoma. When indicated, the selection of a less morbid surgical technique has the potential to improve overall surgical and oncological outcomes.

The risk of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic eradication therapy is used to treat mucosal neoplasms in Barrett's esophagus, but cannot cure cancers that have metastasized to lymph nodes. The risk of such metastases has been proposed as a reason to consider esophagectomy rather than endoscopic therapy for esophageal mucosal neoplasia. The objective of our study was to determine the frequency of lymph-node metastases in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review using the PRISMA guidelines to identify studies that included patients who had esophagectomy for HGD or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus, and that reported final pathology results after examination of esophagectomy specimens.

RESULTS

We identified 70 relevant reports that included 1,874 patients who had esophagectomy performed for HGD or intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Lymph-node metastases were found in 26 patients (1.39 % , 95 % CI 0.86 – 1.92). No metastases were found in the 524 patients who had a final pathology diagnosis of HGD, whereas 26 (1.93 % , 95 % CI 1.19 – 2.66 %) of the 1,350 patients with a final pathology diagnosis of intramucosal carcinoma had positive lymph nodes.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of unexpected lymph-node metastases for patients with mucosal neoplasms in Barrett's esophagus is in the range of 1 – 2 %. Esophagectomy has a mortality rate that often exceeds 2 %, with substantial morbidity and no guarantee of curing metastatic disease. Therefore, the risk of lymph node metastases alone does not warrant the choice of esophagectomy over endoscopic therapy for HGD and intramucosal carcinoma in Barrett's esophagus.

The Use of Neural Networks in Identifying Risk Factors for Lymph Node Metastasis and Recommending Management of T1b Esophageal Cancer

The objective of this study was to establish a prediction model of lymph node status in T1b esophageal carcinoma and define the best squamous and adenocarcinoma predictors. The literature lacks a satisfactory level of evidence of T1b esophageal cancer management. We performed an analysis pooling the effects of outcomes of 2098 patients enrolled into 37 retrospective studies using “neural networks” as data mining techniques. The percentages for lymph node, lymphatic (L1), and vascular (V1) invasion in Sm1 esophageal cancers were 24, 46, and 20 per cent, respectively. The same parameters apply to Sm2 with 34, 63, and 38 per cent as opposed to Sm3 with 51, 69, and 47 per cent. The respective number of patients with well, moderate, and poor histologic differentiation totaled 267, 752, and 582. The rank order of the predictors of lymph node positivity was, respectively: Grade III, (L1), (V1), Sm3 invasion, Sm2 invasion, and Sm1 invasion. Histologic-type squamous and adenocarcinoma (ADC/SCC) was not included in the model. The best predictors for SCC lymph node positivity were sm3 invasion and (V1). As concerns ADC, the most important predictor was (L1). Submucosal esophageal cancer should be managed with surgical resection. However, this is subject to the histologic type and presence of specific predictors that could well alter the perspective of multimodality management.

Prognostic impact of upper, middle, and lower third mucosal or submucosal infiltration in early esophageal cancer

OBJECTIVE

To identify differences in survival of patients with pT1 esophageal cancer relating to depth of wall infiltration.

BACKGROUND DATA

Histologic analysis of mucosal and submucosal infiltration in thirds has shown an increasing rate of lymph node metastases (LNM) according to the depth of wall infiltration in pT1 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

One hundred seventy-one patients had transthoracic en bloc (n = 161) or transhiatal esophagectomy (n = 10) for pT1 esophageal cancer [121 adenocarcinomas (AC), 50 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)]. The histologic analysis of the specimen comprised depth of wall penetration of the carcinoma in thirds of pT1a = mucosa (m1, m2, m3) or pT1b = submucosa (sm1, sm2, sm3) and number and infiltration of the resected lymph nodes.

RESULTS

The rate of LNM was 0% for 70 mucosal carcinomas and 34% for 101 submucosal carcinomas (P = 0.001). For sm1, this rate was 13%, for sm2 19% and for sm3 56%. The 5-year survival rate (5Y-SR) was 82% for pN0 and 45% for pN+ patients (P < 0.001). There was no significant prognostic difference between AC and SCC (5Y-SR: 74% vs 71%). The 5Y-SR of the pT1a group was 87% compared with 66% for pT1b (P = 0.046). The 5-year survival rate for sm1 and sm2 were similar; sm1 + sm2 were together significantly better (80%) than sm3 (46%) (P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, only sm3 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

After esophagectomy, the prognosis of patients with sm1/sm2 infiltration is as good as for patients with mucosal carcinoma. Sm3 infiltration is the worst prognostic factor in pT1 esophageal cancer.

Risk of lymph node metastasis in submucosal esophageal cancer: a review of surgically resected patients

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic local procedures are increasingly applied in patients with superficial esophageal cancer as an alternative to radical oncologic resection. The objective of this article is to determine the risk of nodal metastases in submucosal (sm) esophageal cancer, comparing the two predominating histologic tumor types, squamous cell cancer (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC).

METHODS

A query of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library (1980-2009) using predetermined search terms revealed 675 abstracts, of which 485 full-text articles were reviewed. A total of 105 articles met the selection criteria. A review of article references and consultation with experts revealed additional articles for inclusion. Studies that enrolled patients with submucosal esophageal cancer and provided adequate extractable data were included.

RESULTS

The pooled outcomes of 7645 patients with esophageal cancer involving the sm level of infiltration were included in the analysis. Overall, the percentage of lymph node metastasis in submucosal cancer was 37%. Lymph node (N), lymphatic (L) and vascular (V) invasion in sm1 esophageal cancers was 27, 46 and 22%, respectively. Within sm2 lesions, N, L and V invasion were involved in 38, 63 and 38% of patients, respectively. Finally, N, L and V involvement in patients with sm3 lesions was 54, 69 and 47%, respectively. The rates of lymph node metastasis for sm1 and sm2 were higher in SCC compared with ADC, whereas the lymph node metastasis for sm3 was comparable, with >50% involvement in both histologic subtypes. SCC revealed an overall more aggressive behavior compared with ADC (N+: 45 vs 26%; L+: 57 vs 37%; V+: 40 vs 18%).

DISCUSSION

While endoscopic therapy may be adequate in selected patients with 'low-risk' sm1 ADC, submucosal SCC necessitates esophageal resection and systematic lymphadenectomy because of its aggressive nature and tendency for early metastasis.

Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer

The incidence of oesophageal adenocarcinoma has risen throughout the Western world over the last three decades. The prognosis remains poor as many patients are elderly and present with advanced disease. Those patients who are suitable for resection remain at high risk of disease recurrence. It is important that cancer patients take part in a follow up protocol to detect disease recurrence, offer psychological support, manage nutritional disorders and facilitate audit of surgical outcomes. Despite the recognition that regular postoperative follow up plays a key role in ongoing care of cancer patients, there is little consensus on the nature of the process. This paper reviews the published literature to determine the optimal timing and type of patient follow up for those after curative oesophageal resection.

Risk stratification for early esophageal adenocarcinoma: analysis of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Knowledge of factors related to outcome is vital for the selection of therapeutic alternatives for patients with early (T1) esophageal adenocarcinoma. This study was undertaken to determine predictors of lymphatic spread and prognostic factors for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma following esophagectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospectively maintained database identified 85 patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent esophagectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Depth of tumor invasion (T stage) was subdivided into mucosal (T1a) or submucosal invasion (T1b). Median follow-up was 59 months.

RESULTS

Thoracoscopically assisted 3-phase esophagectomy was performed in 73 of 85 patients (86%). Lymph node metastases (N stage) were identified in 9 of 85 patients (11%). Depth of tumor invasion (T stage), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), and poor differentiation were associated with N stage. The patients could be stratified into 4 risk groups for lymph node metastases: group I--T1a (0 of 35 patients [0%] with positive nodes); group II--T1b, well/moderate differentiation and no LVI (1 of 28 patients [4%] with positive nodes); group III--T1b, poor differentiation and no LVI (2 of 9 patients [22%] with positive nodes); and group IV--T1b any grade with LVI (6 of 13 patients [46%] with positive nodes). Survival analyses found T stage, N stage, LVI, and poor differentiation to be significant prognostic factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk stratification is possible for patents with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Local resection techniques without lymphadenectomy may be alternatives for T1a tumors. Esophagectomy should remain the standard of care for patients with T1b tumors and those with LVI or poor differentiation considered for neoadjuvant therapy.