1
|
Muramoto K, Urabe F, Koike Y, Yamamoto S, Suzuki H, Miyajima K, Fukuokaya W, Iwatani K, Imai Y, Igarashi T, Mori K, Aikawa K, Kimura S, Tashiro K, Yamada Y, Sasaki T, Sato S, Yuen SKK, Shimomura T, Furuta A, Tsuzuki S, Miki J, Kimura T. Perioperative renal function change and oncological outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:332.e21-332.e32. [PMID: 38729868 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) on postoperative renal function in patients diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has not been thoroughly explored. METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis including 785 patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC. We assessed the preoperative and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) and factors related to the decline in eGFR. Additionally, we examined the effect of comorbidities (diabetes or hypertension) on the postoperative eGFR at 1 year. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to investigate the clinical effect of RNUx on oncological outcomes, including non-urothelial tract recurrence-free survival (NUTRFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR levels were 54.7 and 40.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 respectively. The proportions of patients with preoperative and postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 were 35.9% and 5.1%, respectively. The median decline in the eGFR after surgery was 26.8%. Patients with preoperative eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 demonstrated significantly lower odds of a postoperative decline in eGFR of 25% or more. The effect of comorbidities on postoperative eGFR at 1 year was significant (P = 0.048). The 3-year NUTRFS, CSS, and OS rates were 72.9%, 85.2%, and 81.5%, respectively. Preoperative chronic kidney disease was an independent factor associated with inferior NUTRFS, CSS, and OS. CONCLUSION Different degrees of impairment of renal function occur among UTUC patients. Only 5.1% of patients retain a postoperative eGFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Preoperative renal impairment was linked to reduced odds of postoperative eGFR decrease and associated with survival. In addition, the presence of comorbidities had a significant effect on the decline in eGFR. These findings emphasize the importance of developing evidence-based perioperative treatment strategies for UTUC patients with impaired renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katsuki Muramoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fumihiko Urabe
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Yuhei Koike
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shutaro Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Suzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Miyajima
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Iwatani
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yu Imai
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Igarashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Aikawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kojiro Tashiro
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei Katsushika Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuta Yamada
- Department of Urology, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaya Sasaki
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shun Sato
- Department of Pathology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Steffi Kar Kei Yuen
- S.H.Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Tatsuya Shimomura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Furuta
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Urology, Jikei University Kashiwa Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pikul M, Gordiichuk P, Stakhovsky E. Urothelial cancer: state of art in Ukraine and improvement pathways. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:5137-5144. [PMID: 39238972 PMCID: PMC11374189 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aims to assess the effectiveness of urothelial cancer treatment in Ukraine, utilizing population-based data from the National Cancer Registry. The primary goal is to evaluate trends and approaches to therapy, with a focus on overall survival rates in patients with urothelial tumors. Materials and methods A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted based on the National Cancer Registry, involving 12 698 patients (2008-2020) with urothelial tumors of the upper urinary tract (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BC) who underwent surgical treatment. Demographic indicators, surgical interventions, complications, and survival rates were analyzed. Results The average age for all patients was 70 years. The number of patients undergoing radical treatment was 1820 (15%) among BC and 573 (59%) among UTUC. The 30-day readmission rate was low for both, with a slightly higher preference for UTUC (2.3 vs. 4.6%). Whereas grade III or higher Cl-Dindo complications were seen in only 0.2% of cases. Notable findings include low frequency of neoadjuvant (7%) and adjuvant chemotherapy (28%) among patients with invasive urothelial carcinomas. Median eGFR for invasive UTUC before and after surgery was 63.2 and 51.4 ml/min, respectively (P=0.00054). The directly opposite trend was seen in BC-61.2 and 68.7 ml/min, respectively (P=0.0026).For BC, the overall survival rates by stages were: I-73%, II-49%, III-18%, and IV-11% (χ2=1807.207; P=0.000001). As for UTUC, the 5-year overall survival rates corresponded to the literature data, but there was a pronounced negative trend towards a decrease in this indicator after a 10-year period for all stages (χ2=146.298; P=0.000003). Conclusion The study emphasizes the importance of effective systemic treatments, adherence to treatment guidelines, and the need for multidisciplinary consultations among Ukrainian patients with urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maksym Pikul
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine
- Department of Oncology, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Prokip Gordiichuk
- Department of Oncology, Shupyk National Healthcare University of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Eduard Stakhovsky
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Oncourology, National Cancer Institute of Ukraine
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu MZ, Chen JY, Lyu F, Gao XS, Ma MW, Li XY, Li HZ, Qin SB, Gao Y, Wang PY. Exploring Radiotherapy as a Promising Alternative for Managing Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Rescuing Chemotherapy-Intolerant Patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:102203. [PMID: 39241310 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2024.102203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 07/31/2024] [Accepted: 08/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/09/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the safety and effectiveness of radiotherapy for advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients intolerant to chemotherapy. METHODS Data for 21 patients with advanced UTUC intolerant to chemotherapy were retrospectively collected. All patients were treated with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (50-70 Gy/20-33 f) or partial-SABR boost to the lesions (50-60 Gy/20-25 f with tumor center boosted with 6-8 Gy/f, 3-5 f) for bulky tumors. RESULTS The median age was 75 years (range, 58-87 years). Primary tumor resection was performed for all patients and none underwent metastatic resection. Seventeen (81%) patients had oligometastasis (1-5 metastases) at diagnosis. Eighteen (85.7%) received irradiation to all tumor lesions. Lymph node metastasis was predominant in the whole group (17/21). Other lesions were distributed as local recurrence (7/21), bone metastases (2/21) and abdominal wall/muscle (2/21). The median follow-up time was 38.5 months (interquartile range, 15.2-48.7 months). Rate of local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole group at 1 year were 90%, 46.6%, and 80.4%, respectively. At 3 years, LC, PFS and OS were 65.6%, 26.6%, and 40.9%, respectively. Fourteen patients developed acute mild gastrointestinal toxicity, generally of grade 1-2; 8 patients developed acute grade 1-2 hematological toxicity, consisting mainly of anemia and leukopenia. No grade 3 or higher acute or late toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION For patients with advanced UTUC who are not able to tolerate chemotherapy, radiotherapy is a safe treatment and can achieve good local tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Zhu Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China; Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jia-Yan Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Feng Lyu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xian-Shu Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Ming-Wei Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-Ying Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hong-Zhen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shang-Bin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Pei-Yan Wang
- School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kanno T, Kobori G, Saito R, Ito K, Nakagawa H, Takahashi T, Koterazawa S, Takaoka N, Somiya S, Haitani T, Nagahama K, Ito M, Higashi Y, Moroi S, Akao T, Yamada H. Hydronephrosis severity as a predictor of postoperative renal function decline following laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy. Int J Clin Oncol 2024; 29:464-472. [PMID: 38316710 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02468-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate factors, including the degree of hydronephrosis, that may be associated with decreased renal function after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS This study included 252 patients who underwent laparoscopic RNU with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥ 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 in three institutions. We assessed the association between hydronephrosis grade and perioperative renal function and performed a stepwise multivariate linear regression analysis to identify factors associated with postoperative eGFR. Patients with preoperative eGFR ≥ 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 were divided into a training set and an independent external validation set to develop a predictive model for postoperative renal function. RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR were 61.1 and 46.4 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The eGFR preservation rates were 66.9%, 66.6%, 88.1%, and 100.0% in groups without, with mild, moderate, and severe hydronephrosis, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that factors predictive of postoperative eGFR included sex, preoperative eGFR, clinical T stage (cT3-4), and the presence of moderate or severe hydronephrosis. Our predictive model, based on these factors, positively correlated with actual postoperative renal function, and the similarity in categories with or without renal function insufficiency between predicted and actual postoperative renal functions was 78% in both training and validation sets. CONCLUSION Moderate or severe hydronephrosis is associated with a modest postoperative decline in renal function, while mild hydronephrosis is not. Our predictive model may be useful in predicting postoperative renal function insufficiency and guiding decision-making for perioperative medical treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toru Kanno
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, 1-1 Fukakusa Mukaihata-cho, Fushimi-ku, Kyoto, 612-8555, Japan.
| | - Go Kobori
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Saito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Naoto Takaoka
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Shinya Somiya
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takao Haitani
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kanji Nagahama
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Masaaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Higashi
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Seiji Moroi
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu Rosai Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | - Toshiya Akao
- Department of Urology, Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Yamada
- Department of Urology, Ijinkai Takeda General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sasahara T, Yanagisawa T, Sugaya S, Hisakane A, Sakanaka K, Hara S, Otsuka T, Takamizawa S, Yata Y, Takahashi Y, Takiguchi Y, Mori K, Tsuzuki S, Kimura S, Miki J, Kimura T. Prognostic factors for overall survival in clinical node-positive patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2024; 31:386-393. [PMID: 38169105 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is sparse evidence regarding optimal management and prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in patients with clinical node-positive (cN+) upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data from 105 UTUC patients with cN1-2M0 between June 2010 and June 2022 at multiple institutions affiliated with our university. At the time of diagnosis, all patients received standard-of-care treatment including radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), chemotherapy, and/or palliative care. We employed a Cox regression model to analyze the prognostic importance of various factors on overall survival (OS). RESULTS Of 105 patients, 54 (51%) underwent RNU, while 51 (49%) did not. RNU was likely to be selected in patients with younger and higher G8 score, resulting in better median OS in patients who underwent RNU than in those who did not (42 months vs. 15 months, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis among the entire cohort revealed that low G8 score (≤14) (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-3.99), elevated pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) (HR: 3.35, 95%CI: 1.63-6.90), and failure to perform RNU (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.06-4.42) were independent prognostic factors for worse OS. In the subgroup analyses of cohorts who did not undergo RNU, elevated pretreatment CRP was the only independent prognostic factor for worse OS in cN+ UTUC patients. CONCLUSIONS RNU seems to be a reasonable treatment option in cN+ UTUC patients where applicable. Elevated pretreatment CRP appears to be a reliable prognosticator of worse OS and may be helpful in optimizing candidate selection for intensified treatment in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taishiro Sasahara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Machida Municipal Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Sugaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Urology, Machida Municipal Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akira Hisakane
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keigo Sakanaka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Hara
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Otsuka
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigeaki Takamizawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuji Yata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Takahashi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Takiguchi
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mori K, Hatakeyama S, Enokida H, Miyake H, Kikuchi E, Nishiyama H, Ichikawa T, Kamai T, Kaji Y, Kume H, Kondo T, Matsuyama H, Masumori N, Kawauchi A, Takenaka A, Uemura H, Eto M, Nonomura N, Fujii Y, Hinotsu S, Ohyama C. Summary of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma 2023 by the Japanese Urological Association. Int J Urol 2024; 31:194-207. [PMID: 38113344 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
This article is an English translation of the Clinical Practice Guidelines for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (2nd edition) published in June 2023. The Japanese Urological Association's (JUA) Guidelines Committee on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) created a 2023 update guideline to support clinicians' current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate its recommendations into clinical practice. The new guideline adhered as closely as possible to the Minds Manual for Guideline Development 2020 ver. 3.0. Findings related to epidemiological, pathological, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up were reviewed. In addition, seven clinical questions (CQs) were set to determine the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. Preconceptions and biases were removed from the preparation process, the overall evidence was evaluated appropriately, and recommendations were made after fully considering the balance between benefits and harms. Although the evidence is still insufficient to be taken up as a CQ, the latest important information is described in seven columns, and clinical issues that should be resolved in the future related to the CQ are described as recommendations for tomorrow. We hope that these guidelines will help medical professionals, patients, and their families involved in the treatment of UTUC in their decision-making, and hope that a critical review of these guidelines will lead to further refinements in the next edition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| | - Hideki Enokida
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima University, Kagoshima, Kagoshima, Japan
| | - Hideaki Miyake
- Department of Urology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takao Kamai
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kaji
- Department of Radiology, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo, Shimane, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tsunenori Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, Adachi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, JA Yamaguchi Kouseiren Nagato General Hospital, Nagato, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Naoya Masumori
- Department of Urology, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Atsushi Takenaka
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, Yonago, Tottori, Japan
| | - Hirotsugu Uemura
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Norio Nonomura
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhisa Fujii
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Hinotsu
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Management, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fletcher SA, Pallauf M, Watts EK, Lombardo KA, Campbell JA, Rezaee ME, Rouprêt M, Boorjian SA, Potretzke AM, Roshandel MR, Ploussard G, Djaladat H, Ghoreifi A, Mari A, Campi R, Khene ZE, Raman JD, Kikuchi E, Rink M, Abdollah F, Boormans JL, Fujita K, D'Andrea D, Soria F, Breda A, Hoffman-Censits J, McConkey DJ, Shariat SF, Pradere B, Singla N. Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Residual Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00035-X. [PMID: 38262800 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Growing evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the implications of residual UTUC at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) after NAC are not well characterized. Our objective was to compare oncologic outcomes for pathologic risk-matched patients who underwent RNU for UTUC who either received NAC or were chemotherapy-naïve. METHODS We retrospectively identified 1993 patients (including 112 NAC recipients) who underwent RNU for nonmetastatic, high-grade UTUC between 1985 and 2022 in a large, international, multicenter cohort. We divided the cohort into low-risk and high-risk groups defined according to pathologic findings of muscle invasion and lymph node involvement at RNU. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable analyses were performed to determine clinical and demographic factors associated with these outcomes. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Among patients with low-risk pathology at RNU, RFS, OS, and CSS were similar between the NAC and chemotherapy-naïve groups. Among patients with high-risk pathology at RNU, the NAC group had poorer RFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.10-4.48), OS (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.33-3.20), and CSS (subdistribution HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.37-4.69) in comparison to the pathologic risk-matched, chemotherapy-naïve group. Limitations include the lack of centralized pathologic review. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS Patients with residual invasive disease at RNU after NAC represent a uniquely high-risk population with respect to oncologic outcomes. There is a critical need to determine an optimal adjuvant approach for these patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied a large, international group of patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract who underwent surgery either with or without receiving chemotherapy beforehand. We identified a high-risk subgroup of patients with residual aggressive cancer after chemotherapy and surgery who should be prioritized for clinical trials and drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean A Fletcher
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Maximilian Pallauf
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Emelia K Watts
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Kara A Lombardo
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jack A Campbell
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Michael E Rezaee
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, Department of Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | | | | | - M Reza Roshandel
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; Department of Urology, Westchester County Medical Center, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | | | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Jay D Raman
- Department of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Department of Urology, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Joost L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean Hoffman-Censits
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David J McConkey
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Nirmish Singla
- The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liedberg F, Hagberg O, Aljabery F, Gårdmark T, Jahnson S, Jerlström T, Ströck V, Söderkvist K, Ullén A, Bobjer J. Diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies in upper tract urothelial carcinoma in Sweden between 2015 and 2021: a population-based survey. Scand J Urol 2024; 59:19-25. [PMID: 38226846 DOI: 10.2340/sju.v59.16281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report national data on diagnostics and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) from the Swedish National Registry of Urinary Bladder Cancer (SNRUBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 2015 to 2021 were retrieved, and descriptive analyses were performed regarding incidence, diagnostic modalities, preoperative tumor staging, quality indicators for treatment including the use of standardized care pathways (SCP) and multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTB). Time trends were explored for the study period. RESULTS Registrations included 1,213 patients with renal pelvic cancer and 911 patients with ureteric cancer with a median age of 74 (interquartile range [IQR] 70-77) and 75 (IQR 71-78) years, respectively. Incidence rates of UTUC were stable, as were proportions of curative treatment intent. Median number of days from referral to treatment was 76 (IQR 57-99) and 90 (IQR 72-118) days, respectively, for tumors of the renal pelvis and ureter, which remained unchanged after introduction of SCP in 2016. Noticeable trends included stable use of kidney-sparing surgery and increased use of MDTB. For radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), robot-assisted technique usage increased even for non-organ-confined tumors (cT3-4) and in one out of three patients undergoing RNU a bladder cuff excision was not registered. CONCLUSIONS The population-based SNRUBC with high coverage contributes to the knowledge about UTUC with granular and generalizable data. The present study reveals a high proportion of patients not subjected to curatively intended treatment and suggests unmet needs to shorten lead times to treatment and use of bladder cuff excision when performing radical surgery for UTUC in Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hagberg
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Firas Aljabery
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Truls Gårdmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Staffan Jahnson
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Division of Urology, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Viveka Ströck
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden
| | | | - Anders Ullén
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology and Urology unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johannes Bobjer
- Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Grahn A, Coleman JA, Eriksson Y, Gabrielsson S, Madsen JS, Tham E, Thomas K, Turney B, Uhlén P, Vollmer T, Zieger K, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC II Stockholm 2022: diagnostic and prognostic methods-what's around the corner? World J Urol 2023; 41:3405-3411. [PMID: 37725130 PMCID: PMC10693501 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04597-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To map current literature and provide an overview of upcoming future diagnostic and prognostic methods for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), including translational medical science. METHODS A scoping review approach was applied to search the literature. Based on the published literature, and the experts own experience and opinions consensus was reached through discussions at the meeting Consultation on UTUC II in Stockholm, September 2022. RESULTS The gene mutational profile of UTUC correlates with stage, grade, prognosis, and response to different therapeutic strategies. Analysis of pathway proteins downstream of known pathogenic mutations might be an alternative approach. Liquid biopsies of cell-free DNA may detect UTUC with a higher sensitivity and specificity than urinary cytology. Extracellular vesicles from tumour cells can be detected in urine and may be used to identify the location of the urothelial carcinoma in the urinary tract. 3D microscopy of UTUC samples may add information in the analysis of tumour stage. Chemokines and chemokine receptors were linked to overall survival and responsiveness to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, which is potentially also of interest in UTUC. CONCLUSION Current diagnostic methods for UTUC have shortcomings, especially concerning prognostication, which is important for personalized treatment decisions. There are several upcoming methods that may be of interest for UTUC. Most have been studied for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, and it is important to keep in mind that UTUC is a different entity and not all methods are adaptable or applicable to UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Grahn
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonathan A Coleman
- Department of Surgery/Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill-Cornell University Medical College, New York, USA
| | | | - Susanne Gabrielsson
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Departments of Medicine, and Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonna Skov Madsen
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Biochemistry, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Emma Tham
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kay Thomas
- Guy's Stone Unit, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK
| | - Ben Turney
- Department of Urology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Per Uhlén
- Deptartment of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tino Vollmer
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Karsten Zieger
- Department of Urology, Lillebælt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Departments of Urology and Clinical Sciences, Stockholm South General Hospital Stockholm, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gabriel PE, Pinar U, Lenfant L, Parra J, Vaessen C, Mozer P, Chartier-Kastler E, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. Perioperative, renal function and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:3001-3007. [PMID: 37676283 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04590-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To report perioperative, renal function and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS This was a retrospective single-arm monocentric study including all consecutive UTUC patients treated with robot-assisted RNU at our institution between 2014 and 2022. Descriptive statistics with median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables and numbers with frequencies for categorical variables were used to report perioperative and renal function outcomes while Kaplan-Meier curves were computed to present extravesical and intravesical recurrence-free survival(RFS) as well as cancer-specific (CSS) and overall survival (OS) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals(CIs). RESULTS Overall, 70 patients with a median age of 69.6 [63.3-74.9] years were included in our study. With regards to perioperative outcomes, the median operative time was 157 [130-182] min with a median blood loss of 200 [100-300] cc. Intraoperative complications occurred in 4 (5.7%) patients but no conversion to open or laparoscopic surgery was required. Postoperative complications occurred in 9 (12.9%) patients, including 5 (7.1%) with grade ≥ 3 complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The median length of stay was 4 [3-6] days. With regards to renal function outcomes, the median postoperative loss in estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge was 16 [10.25-26] mL/min/1.73 m2. With regards to oncological outcomes, the 3-year extravesical and intravesical RFS, CSS and OS rates were 73.6 [62.8-86.2]%, 68.1 [54.6-85]%, 82.5 [72-94.4]% and 75.3 [63.4-89.5]%, respectively. CONCLUSION We report favorable perioperative and oncological outcomes with expected decrease in renal function after robot-assisted RNU for patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Etienne Gabriel
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Ugo Pinar
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Louis Lenfant
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Parra
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Vaessen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Mozer
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Department of Urology, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, APHP, GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, Sorbonne University, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gabriel PE, Lambert T, Dumont C, Gauthier H, Masson-Lecomte A, Culine S. [Preoperative chemotherapy for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Impact on renal function]. Prog Urol 2023; 33:446-455. [PMID: 37414668 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2023.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. The standard treatment for localized disease is based on total nephroureterectomy (NUT) followed by platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for eligible patients at risk of recurrence. However, many patients have renal failure after surgery preventing chemotherapy. Thus, the place of preoperative chemotherapy (POC) is questioned with little information available about renal toxicity and efficacity. METHODS A single center retrospective study was performed on patients with UTUC who received POC. RESULTS In all, 24 patients with localized UTUC were treated with POC between 2013 and 2022. Twenty-one (91%) had secondarily NUT. In this cohort, POC did not result in degradation of median renal function (pre-POC median GFR: 70mL/min, post-POC median GFR: 77mL/min, P=0.79), unlike NUT (post-NUT median GFR: 51.5mL/min, P<0.001). In addition, the rate of complete pathological response to pathological examination was 29%. After a median follow-up of 27.4 months, the overall survival rate was 74% and the recurrence-free survival rate was 46%. CONCLUSION POC for UTUC shows a very reassuring renal toxicity profile and encouraging histological results. These data encourage prospective studies assessing its place for UTUC management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P-E Gabriel
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - T Lambert
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - C Dumont
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - H Gauthier
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France
| | - S Culine
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP-Nord, 1, avenue Claude-Vellefaux, 75010 Paris, France; Université Paris-Cité, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Okuyama Y, Hatakeyama S, Tabata R, Fujimori D, Kawashima Y, Tanaka T, Fujita N, Okamoto T, Mori K, Yamamoto H, Yoneyama T, Hashimoto Y, Matsuoka T, Sato S, Ohyama C. Impact of nephroureterectomy on postoperative renal function in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter retrospective study. Int J Urol 2023; 30:649-657. [PMID: 37130800 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of radical nephroureterectomy on postoperative renal function in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We retrospectively evaluated 645 patients with UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy between January 2000 and May 2022. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Secondary outcomes included the rate of eGFR decline, identification of factors related to eGFR decline, and the impact of comorbidities (diabetes or cardiovascular disease) on postoperative eGFR at 1 year. RESULTS The median preoperative and postoperative eGFR levels were 55.6 and 43.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 , respectively. The rate of patients with preoperative and postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 40.9% and 9.0%, respectively. The median decline in eGFR after surgery was 25.1%. The presence of preoperative unilateral hydronephrosis and eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was significantly associated with a low decline of postoperative eGFR and poor survival. The impact of the presence of comorbidities on postoperative eGFR at 1 year was significant (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Impaired renal function is prevalent in patients with UTUC. The rate of patients with postoperative eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 was 9.0%. The presence of preoperative renal impairment was significantly related to a low decline in postoperative eGFR and poor survival. The presence of comorbidities had a significant effect on eGFR decline 1 year after radical nephroureterectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiharu Okuyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Shingo Hatakeyama
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Ryuji Tabata
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Daiji Fujimori
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Yohei Kawashima
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan
| | - Naoki Fujita
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Teppei Okamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Mori
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hayato Yamamoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoneyama
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Hashimoto
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Sato
- Department of Urology, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Chikara Ohyama
- Department of Urology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
- Department of Advanced Blood Purification Therapy, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
- Department of Advanced Transplant and Regenerative Medicine, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trail M, Rahman MSW, Broadhurst WJ, Blackmur JP, Sharma A, Chew E, O'Donnell M, Keanie JY, Brush J, Taylor J, Phipps S, Thomas B, Mains EAA, McNeill SA, Leung S, Cutress ML, Laird A. Diagnostic evaluation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: can we safely omit diagnostic ureteroscopy? BJU Int 2023; 131:755-762. [PMID: 36495480 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify clinicopathological or radiological factors that may predict a diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial cell carcinoma (UTUC) to inform which patients can proceed directly to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) without the delay for diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). PATIENTS AND METHODS All consecutive patients investigated for suspected UTUC in a high-volume UK centre between 2011 and 2017 were identified through retrospective analysis of surgical logbooks and a prospectively maintained pathology database. Details on clinical presentation, radiological findings, and URS/RNU histopathology results were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to evaluate predictors of a final diagnosis of UTUC. RESULTS In all, 260 patients were investigated, of whom 230 (89.2%) underwent URS. RNU was performed in 131 patients (50.4%), of whom 25 (9.6%) proceeded directly without URS - all of whom had a final histopathological diagnosis of UTUC - and 15 (11.5%) underwent RNU after URS despite no conclusive histopathological confirmation of UTUC. Major surgery was avoided in 77 patients (33.5%) where a benign or alternative diagnosis was made on URS, and 14 patients (6.1%) underwent nephron-sparing surgery. Overall, 178 patients (68.5%) had a final diagnosis of UTUC confirmed on URS/RNU histopathology. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, a presenting complaint of visible haematuria (hazard ratio [HR] 5.17, confidence interval [CI] 1.91-14.0; P = 0.001), a solid lesion reported on imaging (HR 37.8, CI = 11.7-122.1; P < 0.001) and a history of smoking (HR 3.07, CI 1.35-6.97; P = 0.007), were predictive of a final diagnosis of UTUC. From this cohort, 51 (96.2%) of 53 smokers who presented with visible haematuria and who had a solid lesion on computed tomography urogram had UTUC on final histopathology. CONCLUSION We identified specific factors which may assist clinicians in selecting which patients may reliably proceed to RNU without the delay of diagnostic URS. These findings may inform a prospective multicentre analysis including additional variables such as urinary cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Trail
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - William J Broadhurst
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - James P Blackmur
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Abhishek Sharma
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Etienne Chew
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Marie O'Donnell
- Department of Histopathology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Julian Y Keanie
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John Brush
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - John Taylor
- Department of Radiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Simon Phipps
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Ben Thomas
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - S Alan McNeill
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Steve Leung
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Mark L Cutress
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Alexander Laird
- Department of Urology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
- Centre for Genomic & Experimental Medicine, Institute of Genetics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Su R, Chen Z, Hong D, Jiang S, Yuan Y, Cai X, Hu H, Fu C, Huang Z, Wang Z, Zheng B, Huang J, Wang Z, Bao Y, Cai M, Guo J, Chen M, Wei Q, Huang J, Xue W. Effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multicenter, retrospective, real-world study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:10587-10596. [PMID: 36952461 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The effectiveness and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy in advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is less reported. METHODS In total, 106 consecutive advanced UTUC patients receiving ICI monotherapy were collected from nine high volume centers. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to multiple parameters (e.g., treatment line, metastatic sites). Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were captured after ICI initiation. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 12.0 months, 25 patients in the first-line group and 15 patients in the second-line group died of UTUC. We reported a median OS of 18.0 months, a median PFS of 5.0 months, and an ORR of 38.6% for patients in the first-line group; a median OS of 10.0 months, a median OS of 4.0 months, and an ORR of 27.8% for patients in the second-line group. Complete response was observed in two patients in the first-line group and one patient in the second-line group with a total complete response rate of 2.8%. In the univariate and multivariate analysis, visceral metastasis with a hazard ratio of 2.4 was associate with poor OS. The most common treatment-related adverse events included fatigue (11.3%), pruritus (10.4%), and diarrhea (6.6%). CONCLUSIONS This real-world study suggests that ICI monotherapy is active and has acceptable toxic effects for unresectable or metastatic UTUC as first-line therapy in cisplatin-ineligible patients or second-line therapy in platinum-refractory patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruopeng Su
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Daoping Hong
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yichu Yuan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xingyun Cai
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hailong Hu
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Changde Fu
- Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Zhiyang Huang
- Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Wang
- The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Bing Zheng
- The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Jian Huang
- The Department of Urology, AnHui NO.2 Provincial People Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Zaoyu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yige Bao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Cai
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Paciotti M, Alkhatib KY, Nguyen DD, Yim K, Lipsitz SR, Mossanen M, Casale P, Pierorazio PM, Kibel AS, Trinh QD, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G, Cole AP. Is Segmental Ureterectomy Associated with Inferior Survival for Localized Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma of the Ureter Compared to Radical Nephroureterectomy? Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15051373. [PMID: 36900166 PMCID: PMC10000204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15051373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Revised: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Segmental ureterectomy (SU) is an alternative to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in the treatment of upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) of the ureter. SU generally preserves renal function, at the expense of less intensive cancer control. We aim to assess whether SU is associated with inferior survival compared to RNU. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we identified patients diagnosed with localized UTUC of the ureter between 2004-2015. We used a propensity-score-overlap-weighted (PSOW) multivariable survival model to compare survival following SU vs. RNU. PSOW-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves were generated and we performed a non-inferiority test of overall survival. A population of 13,061 individuals with UTUC of the ureter receiving either SU or RNU was identified; of these, 9016 underwent RNU and 4045 SU. Factors associated with decreased likelihood of receiving SU were female gender (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.75-0.88; p < 0.001), advanced clinical T stage (cT4) (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.30-0.88; p = 0.015), and high-grade tumor (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67-0.86; p < 0.001). Age greater than 79 years was associated with increased probability of undergoing SU (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.00-1.38; p = 0.047). There was no statistically significant difference in OS between SU and RNU (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.93-1.04; p = 0.538). SU was not inferior to RNU in PSOW-adjusted Cox regression analysis (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). In weighted cohorts of individuals with UTUC of the ureter, the use of SU was not associated with inferior survival compared to RNU. Urologists should continue to utilize SU in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Paciotti
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Khalid Y. Alkhatib
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Division of Urology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - David-Dan Nguyen
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Kendrick Yim
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Stuart R. Lipsitz
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
| | - Matthew Mossanen
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Paolo Casale
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Quoc-Dien Trinh
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Nicoló Maria Buffi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Lughezzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20090 Milan, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-(028)-224-7356
| | - Alexander P. Cole
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
- Division of Urological Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Subclassification of pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective study. World J Urol 2023; 41:767-776. [PMID: 36739339 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04300-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) varies. The current study aimed to further classify patients with pT3 UTUC into different survival outcome groups based on tumor location and site of invasion. METHODS This retrospective study included 323 patients with pT3 UTUC who underwent nephroureterectomy at 11 hospitals in Japan. Histological and clinical data were obtained via a chart review. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses showed the effect of different variables on recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS The median age of the patients was 72 years. Patients with pT3 UTUCs were divided into two groups: those with renal parenchymal invasion only (pT3a, n = 95) and those with peripelvic or periureteral fat invasion (pT3b, n = 228). pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with hydronephrosis, low preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), histological nodal metastasis, nuclear grade 3, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), carcinoma in situ, and positive surgical margin. Based on the univariate analyses, patients with pT3b UTUC had a significantly lower 5-year RFS (42.4% vs. 70.1%, p < 0.0001), 5-year CSS (54.3% vs. 80.0%, p = 0.0002), and 5-year OS (47.8% vs. 76.8%, p < 0.0001) than those with pT3a UTUC. According to the multivariate analyses, nodal metastasis, LVI, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative eGFR, nuclear grade (RFS only), surgical margin (RFS only), and Charlson comorbidity index (OS only), but not pT3b stage, were associated with survival. CONCLUSION Compared with pT3a UTUC, pT3b UTUC was significantly associated with worse histological features, consequently resulting in unsatisfactory survival outcomes.
Collapse
|
17
|
Cheng PY, Lee HY, Li WM, Huang SK, Liu CL, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Wang SS, Chen CS, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Yeong-Chin J, Cheong IS, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen YT, Chen SH, Chiang BJ, Hsueh TY, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tsai YC, Yu KJ, Huang CP, Huang YY, Tsai CY. Preoperative hydronephrosis is an independent protective factor of renal function decline after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:944321. [PMID: 36910617 PMCID: PMC9998910 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.944321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the predictive role of pre-nephroureterectomy (NU) hydronephrosis on post-NU renal function (RF) change and preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and methods This retrospective study collected data of 1018 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group registry of 26 institutions. The patients were divided into two groups based on the absence or presence of pre-NU hydronephrosis. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated pre- and post-NU respectively. The one month post-NU RF change, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and the preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy were compared for each CKD stage. Results 404 (39.2%) patients without and 614 (60.8%) patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis were enrolled. The median post-NU change in the eGFR was significantly lower in the hydronephrosis group (-3.84 versus -12.88, p<0.001). Pre-NU hydronephrosis was associated with a lower post-NU CKD progression rate (33.1% versus 50.7%, p< 0.001) and was an independent protective factor for RF decline after covariate adjustment (OR=0.46, p<0.001). Patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis had a higher preserved eligibility rate for either adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR=3.09, 95%CI 1.95-4.69) or immune-oncology therapy (OR=2.31, 95%CI 1.23-4.34). Conclusion Pre-NU hydronephrosis is an independent protective predictor for post-NU RF decline, CKD progression, and eligibility for adjuvant therapy. With cautious selection for those unfavorably prognostic, non-metastatic UTUC patients with preoperative hydronephrosis, adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant therapy could be considered due to higher chance of preserving eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pai-Yu Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.,Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Liang Liu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jou Yeong-Chin
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Jie Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology and Graduate Institute of Biochemical and Biomedical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-You Huang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mazzaschi G, Giudice GC, Corianò M, Campobasso D, Perrone F, Maffezzoli M, Testi I, Isella L, Maestroni U, Buti S. Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma: A Unique Immuno-Molecular Entity and a Clinical Challenge in the Current Therapeutic Scenario. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2023; 22:15330338231159753. [PMID: 36855829 PMCID: PMC9983117 DOI: 10.1177/15330338231159753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most frequent malignancy of the urinary tract, which consists of bladder cancer (BC) for 90%, while 5% to 10%, of urinary tract UC (UTUC). BC and UTUC are characterized by distinct phenotypical and genotypical features as well as specific gene- and protein- expression profiles, which result in a diverse natural history of the tumor. With respect to BC, UTUC tends to be diagnosed in a later stage and displays poorer clinical outcome. In the present review, we seek to highlight the individuality of UTUC from a biological, immunological, genetic-molecular, and clinical standpoint, also reporting the most recent evidence on UTUC treatment. In this regard, while the role of surgery in nonmetastatic UTUC is undebated, solid data on adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy are still an unmet need, not permitting a definite paradigm shift in the standard treatment. In advanced setting, evidence is mainly based on BC literature and retrospective studies and confirms platinum-based combination regimens as bedrock of first-line treatment. Recently, immunotherapy and target therapy are gaining a foothold in the treatment of metastatic disease, with pembrolizumab and atezolizumab showing encouraging results in combination with chemotherapy as a first-line strategy. Moreover, atezolizumab performed well as a maintenance treatment, while pembrolizumab as a single agent achieved promising outcomes in second-line setting. Regarding the target therapy, erdafitinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor, and enfortumab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate, proved to have a strong antitumor property, likely due to the distinctive immune-genetic background of UTUC. In this context, great efforts have been addressed to uncover the biological, immunological, and clinical grounds in UTUC patients in order to achieve a personalized treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Mazzaschi
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Giulia Claire Giudice
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Matilde Corianò
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Davide Campobasso
- Department of Urology, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Fabiana Perrone
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Michele Maffezzoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Irene Testi
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Luca Isella
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Umberto Maestroni
- Department of Urology, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Buti
- Medical Oncology Unit, 18630University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.,Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Huang J, Su R, Chen Z, Jiang S, Chen M, Yuan Y, Hu H, Fu C, Huang Z, Wang Z, Zheng B, Li C, Wang Z, Bao Y, Cai M, Guo J, Wei Q, Xue W. The efficacy and safety of first-line treatment in cisplatin-ineligible advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients: a comparison of PD-1 inhibitor and carboplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy. Oncoimmunology 2022; 11:2124691. [PMID: 36148322 PMCID: PMC9487735 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2124691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Although several programmed cell death (PD)-1 inhibitors are approved for the first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma, their efficacy remains unknown in cisplatin-ineligible patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) compared with gemcitabine plus carboplatin. Data for patients with UTUC were retrospectively retrieved from the electronic medical records of nine institutions between 2018 and 2021. Patients considered ineligible for cisplatin who received either PD-1 inhibitors (n = 70) or gemcitabine plus carboplatin (n = 53) were included. Efficacy was assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. The objective response rate (ORR) was comparable between the PD-1 inhibitor and carboplatin–gemcitabine groups (38.6% versus 41.5%). Median PFS was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0–8.0) in the PD-1 inhibitor group, versus 7.0 months (95% CI: 5.8–8.2) in the carboplatin–gemcitabine group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.741, 95% CI: 0.485–1.132, p = .166). Median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 4.1–31.9) in the PD-1 inhibitor group, compared with 14 months (95% CI: 12.1–15.9) in the carboplatin–gemcitabine group (HR = 0.731, 95% CI: 0.426–1.256, p = .257). The duration of response was significantly longer in the PD-1 inhibitor group than in the carboplatin–gemcitabine group (not reached vs. 9 months, p < .001). Treatment-related adverse events were less frequent in the PD-1 inhibitor group than in the carboplatin–gemcitabine group (57.1% vs. 77.3%). In conclusion, PD-1 inhibitors displayed promising efficacy with less toxicity and longer DOR in the first-line treatment of UTUC in patients ineligible for cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiwei Huang
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruopeng Su
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shuai Jiang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Minfeng Chen
- Department of Urology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yichu Yuan
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hailong Hu
- Department of Urology, The second hospital of Tianjin medical university, Tianjin, China
| | - Changde Fu
- Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Zhiyang Huang
- Department of Urology, Quanzhou First Hospital affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Zhenyu Wang
- The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Bing Zheng
- The Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Chancan Li
- The Department of Urology, AnHui NO. 2 Provincial People Hospital, Hefei, China
| | - Zaoyu Wang
- Department of Pathology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yige Bao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ming Cai
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Jianming Guo
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospitlal, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoffman-Censits J, Maldonado L. Targeted Treatment of Locally Advanced and Metastatic Urothelial Cancer: Enfortumab Vedotin in Context. Onco Targets Ther 2022; 15:1519-1529. [PMID: 36545447 PMCID: PMC9762760 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s370900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate that is the first in class to be FDA-approved for use in patients with treatment-refractory urothelial cancer. Enfortumab is comprised of an antibody targeting nectin-4, widely expressed in urothelial cancers, with an monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) chemotherapy payload. To date, trials in urothelial cancers refractory to platinum-based chemotherapy, and or checkpoint inhibitors, have shown the drug is very active, with overall responses ranging from 40% to 52%. This includes patients with visceral metastasis, a known predictor of poor prognosis. EV is fairly well tolerated, including in patients who are not candidates for cisplatin, a common urothelial cancer population with significant unmet need. Side effects such as skin toxicity, fatigue, and blood sugar elevations are generally manageable with supportive care and dose modifications. Peripheral neuropathy is common and can be dose-limiting in responding patients, and rare serious skin toxicities have been reported. Trials in various disease states and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors and other agents are ongoing, with additional indications likely in the future for EV in urothelial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Hoffman-Censits
- Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, The Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, Baltimore, MD, USA,Correspondence: Jean Hoffman-Censits, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Departments of Medical Oncology and Urology, Johns Hopkins Greenberg Bladder Cancer Institute, 201 N. Broadway, 9th Floor, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA, Tel +1 443-287-0553, Fax +1 410-367-2667, Email
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Masson-Lecomte A, Vaillant V, Roumiguié M, Lévy S, Pradère B, Peyromaure M, Duquesne I, De La Taille A, Lebâcle C, Panis A, Traxer O, Leon P, Hulin M, Xylinas E, Audenet F, Seisen T, Loriot Y, Allory Y, Rouprêt M, Neuzillet Y. Oncological Outcomes of Distal Ureterectomy for High-Risk Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study by The French Bladder Cancer Committee. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14215452. [PMID: 36358870 PMCID: PMC9656759 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard treatment for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). It implies significant reduction in the renal function, compromising adjuvant chemotherapy administration and leading to risk of end stage renal disease in frail patients. Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear mainly due to concern about potential upper tract recurrences. The objective of our retrospective study was to determine the oncologic outcomes of DU for high-risk UTUC of the pelvic ureter, and to assess factors associated with recurrence in the particular population. We showed that oncological outcomes after DU were similar to those after RNU. Some of the classical prognostic factors after RNU were not identified in this cohort, pinpointing the necessity to consider tumors of the distal ureter as a specific entity. Abstract Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon disease and its gold-standard treatment is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Distal ureterectomy (DU) might be an alternative for tumors of the distal ureter but its indications remain unclear. Here, we aimed to evaluate the oncological outcomes of DU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with UTUC who underwent DU. The primary endpoint was 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS), followed by overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence-free (IVR) and homolateral urinary tract recurrence-free (HUR) survivals as secondary endpoints. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were performed to assess factors associated with outcomes. 155 patients were included, 91% of which were high-risk. 5-year CSS was 84.4%, OS was 71.9%, IVR-free survival was 43.6% and HUR-free survival was 74.4%. Multifocality, high grade and tumor size were the most significant predictors of survival endpoints. Of note, neither hydronephrosis nor pre-operative diagnostic ureteroscopy/JJ stent were associated with any of the endpoints. Perioperative morbidity was minimal. In conclusion, DU stands as a possible alternative to RNU for UTUC of the pelvic ureter. Close monitoring is mandatory due to the high risk of recurrence in the remaining urinary tract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Masson-Lecomte
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Saint Louis, 75010 Paris, France
- Inserm, CEA, HIPI, Université Paris Cité, 75475 Paris, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Victoire Vaillant
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Stéphan Lévy
- Department of Urology, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, 31000 Toulouse, France
| | - Benjamin Pradère
- Department of Urology-UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hospital, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Michaël Peyromaure
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Igor Duquesne
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Cochin, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Alexandre De La Taille
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Henri Mondor, Université Paris-Est Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Cédric Lebâcle
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Adrien Panis
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Université Paris Sud-Saclay, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Olivier Traxer
- GRC 10 Lithiase Urinaire, Department of Urology, APHP, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Priscilla Leon
- Department of Urology, clinique Pasteur, 17200 Royan, France
| | - Maud Hulin
- Department of Urology, clinique Pasteur, 17200 Royan, France
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Bichat Claude-Bernard, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - François Audenet
- Department of Urology, APHP, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université Paris Cité, 75014 Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Department of Urology, APHP, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yohann Loriot
- Department of Cancer Medicine, INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, 94805 Villejuif, France
| | - Yves Allory
- Department of Pathology, Curie Institute, University of Paris-Saclay–UVSQ, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Urology, Department of Urology, APHP, Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital, Sorbonne University, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Yann Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Foch, University of Paris-Saclay–UVSQ, 92150 Suresnes, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clinical Implication of Preoperative Renal Function on Oncological Outcomes in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10061340. [PMID: 35740362 PMCID: PMC9220201 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the impact of preoperative renal function on oncological outcomes in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent RNU between 2000 and 2012 at six academic centers. The patients were stratified into two groups based on preoperative renal function: eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (chronic kidney disease; CKD) and eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (non-CKD). We investigated oncological outcomes, including overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival dichotomized by preoperative renal function. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine if preoperative CKD was associated with oncological outcomes. In total, 1733 patients were eligible for the present study (CKD = 707 and non-CKD = 1026). Significant differences were noted in the clinical and pathologic features among the two groups, including age, sex, tumor localization, pathological T stage, tumor grade, and number of patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy. The estimated five-year overall survival (79.4 vs. 67.5%, log-rank p < 0.001), cancer-specific survival (83.5 vs. 73.6%, log-rank p < 0.001), and progression-free survival (74.6 vs. 61.5%, log-rank p < 0.001) were significantly different between the two groups, longer in the non-CKD group. Upon multivariable analysis, preoperative CKD status was associated with increased risk of overall mortality, cancer-specific mortality, and progression (p = 0.010, p = 0.016, and p = 0.008, respectively). UTUC patients with preoperative CKD had a higher risk of poor overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival after RNU than those without CKD.
Collapse
|
23
|
Stangl-Kremser J, Muto G, Grosso AA, Briganti A, Comperat E, Di Maida F, Montironi R, Remzi M, Pradere B, Soria F, Albisinni S, Roupret M, Shariat SF, Minervini A, Teoh JYC, Moschini M, Cimadamore A, Mari A. The impact of lymphovascular invasion in patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: An extensive updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:243-261. [PMID: 35241364 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) often have a delayed diagnosis and by then, present with advanced disease which has been shown to be associated with lymphovascular invasion (LVI). It has been suggested to be involved in the metastatic cascade of the disease. In this review, we provide an extensive up-to-date summary of the current knowledge about the prognostic impact of LVI in patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, and Web of Science for all reports published from 2010 through 2021 was performed. We performed pooled analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of series that evaluated LVI as a prognostic factor in adults with UTUC who underwent RNU. The assessed oncological outcomes were disease recurrence, cancer-specific and overall survival. A meta-regression analysis was used to explore potential heterogeneity. A total of 58 series met the eligibility criteria for qualitative and quantitative synthesis. We included 29,829 patients, ranging from 101 to 2492 per study. All series were retrospective. LVI was present in 7,818 patients (26.2%). The median age of the patients was 69 years and the median follow-up was 40 months. In 40 of 58 studies (68.9%), adjuvant chemotherapy was given. The pooled HRs show that LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence of the disease (pooled HR 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31-1.55, P = 0.000; I2 = 76.3%), and decreases cancer-specific survival (pooled HR 1.53, 95% CI: 1.41-1.66, P = 0.000; I2 = 72.3%) and overall survival (HR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45-1.69, P = 0.000; I2 = 62.9%). It can be concluded that LVI is a common histologic pattern in surgical specimen in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC. LVI predicts a greater risk of recurrence and mortality, thus it should be carefully assessed in clinical practice to determine prognosis, and for optimal decision-making within the concept of personalized therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianluca Muto
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Andrea Grosso
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Eva Comperat
- Department of Pathology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fabrizio Di Maida
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Montironi
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Mesut Remzi
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Francesco Soria
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, University Clinics of Brussels, Hôpital Erasme Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh Francois Shariat
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Cimadamore
- Molecular Medicine and Cell Therapy Foundation, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miyake M, Yoshida T, Nishimura N, Oda Y, Shimizu T, Nakahama T, Hori S, Morizawa Y, Gotoh D, Nakai Y, Anai S, Torimoto K, Fujii T, Tanaka N, Fujimoto K. A prospective, single-arm trial of fluorescent ureteroscopy-assisted thulium-holmium:YAG dual laser ablation for upper urinary tract cancer: Study protocol of the FLUAM trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2022; 26:100902. [PMID: 35257033 PMCID: PMC8897668 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2022.100902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Latest guidelines recommend kidney-sparing management as the primary treatment option for selected patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). One of the biggest issues of ureteroscopic laser ablation (ULA) is a high rate of surgical site recurrence, which is largely attributed to residual lesions at the initial ULA. Another clinical issue is a significant lack of non-invasive reliable detection tools of urinary recurrent tumors in this treatment setting. Methods The FLUAM trial is a prospective, single-center, single-arm pilot trial to investigate the efficacy of 5-aminolevulinic acid-mediated photodynamic diagnosis (ALA-PDD)-assisted ULA for localized UTUC and the usefulness of the UroVysion® assay (multiprobe fluorescence in situ hybridization) as a monitoring test after the kidney-sparing treatment. After the screening and registration, a total of 20 patients with localized UTUC will undergo the initial ALA-PDD-assisted ULA followed by the second look ALA-PDD-assisted ureteroscopic examination. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include patient reported outcomes, diagnostic accuracy of UroVysion assay to detect tumor recurrence, adverse events, and safety of the intervention. Conclusion The goal of this trial is to determine the potential benefit of ALA-PDD assistance in patients who undergo the ULA. The evidence of this novel technique is still limited. The results are expected to change the standard of care and lead to better management of localized UTUC. Trial registration This clinical trial was prospectively registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials on 23 June 2021. The reference number is jRCTs051210042, nara0023 (Certified Review Board of Nara Medical University).
Collapse
|
25
|
Cinque A, Capasso A, Vago R, Floris M, Lee MW, Minnei R, Trevisani F. MicroRNA Signatures in the Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Scenario: Ready for the Game Changer? Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:2602. [PMID: 35269744 PMCID: PMC8910117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23052602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a minor subgroup of malignancies arising in the urothelium of the renal pelvis or ureter. The estimated annual incidence is around 2 cases per 100,000 people, with a mean age at diagnosis of 73 years. UTUC is more frequently diagnosed in an invasive or metastatic stage. However, even though the incidence of UTUC is not high, UTUC tends to be aggressive and rapidly progressing with a poor prognosis in some patients. A significant challenge in UTUC is ensuring accurate and timely diagnosis, which is complicated by the non-specific nature of symptoms seen at the onset of disease. Moreover, there is a lack of biomarkers capable of identifying the early presence of the malignancy and guide-tailored medical treatment. However, the growing understanding of the molecular biology underlying UTUC has led to the discovery of promising new biomarkers. Among these biomarkers, there is a class of small non-coding RNA biomarkers known as microRNAs (miRNAs) that are particularly promising. In this review, we will analyze the main characteristics of UTUC and focus on microRNAs as possible novel tools that could enter clinical practice in order to optimize the current diagnostic and prognostic algorithm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Cinque
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Anna Capasso
- Department of Medical Oncology Livestrong Cancer Institutes, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Riccardo Vago
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery,, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Floris
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Michael W. Lee
- Department of Medical Oncology and Medical Education, Dell Medical School, Livestrong Cancer Institutes, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78723, USA;
| | - Roberto Minnei
- Nephrology, Dialysis, and Transplantation, Università degli Studi di Cagliari, G. Brotzu Hospital, 09134 Cagliari, Italy; (M.F.); (R.M.)
| | - Francesco Trevisani
- Biorek S.r.l., San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Urological Research Institute, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Unit of Urology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Zhao F, Qi N, Shen X, Xiong Z, Xue N, Xu Y, Wang J, Zhu H. Free Ferrous Protoporphyrin and Reactive Oxygen Species Status of Voided Urine Predicts Higher Stage in Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:615-621. [PMID: 35210858 PMCID: PMC8857996 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s352127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between the free ferrous protoporphyrin and reactive oxygen species (FH and ROS) combined test and the tumor grade and stage in a pathologically confirmed uroepithelial carcinoma (UC) patient population. Patients and Methods In this retrospective study, we enrolled patients newly diagnosed with UC between May 2020 and June 2021. All patients were classified as FH(+) and ROS(+), FH(+) and ROS(-), or FH(-) and ROS(-), based on the FH and ROS combined test of voided urine. Demographic information, pathological results, and status of the FH and ROS combined test were reviewed retrospectively. The relationship between FH and ROS combined test status and tumor stage and grade was evaluated using logistic regression. Results This study included 120 UC patients with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 62–77 years). Eighteen patients (15%) were diagnosed with upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and the others (85%) were diagnosed with bladder cancer. The pathological stages for those with FH(+) and ROS(+) at diagnosis were 25.0% Ta, 45.8% T1, and 29.2% ≥T2. The pathological stages for those with FH(+) and ROS(-) at diagnosis were 23.5% Ta, 35.3% T1, and 41.2% ≥T2. The pathological stages for those with FH(-) and ROS(-) at diagnosis were 52.6% Ta, 26.3% T1, and 21.1% ≥T2. After adjusting for clinical factors, including age, sex, and smoking history, FH(+) and ROS(-) were independent risk factors for muscle-invasive UC (≥T2 stage) at diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 3.379; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.103–10.355; P=0.033) in the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Conclusion Among patients with newly diagnosed UC, FH(+) and ROS(-) might have an association with a more advanced pathological stage. This finding may help differentiate between patients with aggressive diseases and those who may benefit from organ-sparing surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fangzheng Zhao
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Nienie Qi
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xihao Shen
- The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, NanJing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zhuang Xiong
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ning Xue
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yang Xu
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| | - Junqi Wang
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Junqi Wang; Haitao Zhu, Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, No. 99 Huaihai West Road, Quanshan District, Xuzhou, 221100, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86-18761389113, Fax +86051685609999, Email ;
| | - Haitao Zhu
- Department of Urology, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Grossmann NC, Pradere B, D'Andrea D, Schuettfort VM, Mori K, Rajwa P, Quhal F, Laukhtina E, Katayama S, Fankhauser CD, Xylinas E, Margulis V, Moschini M, Abufaraj M, Bandini M, Lonati C, Nyirady P, Karakiewicz PI, Fajkovic H, Shariat SF. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: Oncologic Outcomes from a Multicenter Study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2022; 20:227-236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Revised: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
28
|
Wu Z, Chen Q, Djaladat H, Minervini A, Uzzo RG, Sundaram CP, Rha KH, Gonzalgo ML, Mehrazin R, Mazzone E, Marcus J, Danno A, Porter J, Asghar A, Ghali F, Guruli G, Douglawi A, Cacciamani G, Ghoreifi A, Simone G, Margulis V, Ferro M, Tellini R, Mari A, Srivastava A, Steward J, Al-Qathani A, Al-Mujalhem A, Bhattu AS, Mottrie A, Abdollah F, Eun DD, Derweesh I, Veccia A, Autorino R, Wang L. A Preoperative Nomogram to Predict Renal Function Insufficiency for Cisplatin-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy (ROBUUST Collaborative Group). Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:173-181. [PMID: 33549537 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2020] [Revised: 12/16/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative renal function impairment represents a main limitation for delivering adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). OBJECTIVE To create a model predicting renal function decline after minimally invasive RNU. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A total of 490 patients with nonmetastatic UTUC who underwent minimally invasive RNU were identified from a collaborative database including 17 institutions worldwide (February 2006 to March 2020). Renal function insufficiency for cisplatin-based regimen was defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <50 ml/min/1.73 m2 at 3 mo after RNU. Patients with baseline eGFR >50 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 361) were geographically divided into a training set (n = 226) and an independent external validation set (n = 135) for further analysis. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Using transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines, a nomogram to predict postoperative eGFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m2 was built based on the coefficients of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operation (LASSO) logistic regression. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical use of the nomogram were investigated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The model that incorporated age, body mass index, preoperative eGFR, and hydroureteronephrosis was developed with an area under the curve of 0.771, which was confirmed to be 0.773 in the external validation set. The calibration curve demonstrated good agreement. Besides, the model was converted into a risk score with a cutoff value of 0.583, and the difference between the low- and high-risk groups both in overall death risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.59, p < 0.001) and cancer-specific death risk (HR: 5.19, p < 0.001) was statistically significant. The limitation mainly lies in its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS A nomogram incorporating immediately available clinical variables can accurately predict renal insufficiency for cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy after minimally invasive RNU and may serve as a tool facilitating patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We have developed a model for the prediction of renal function loss after radical nephroureterectomy to facilitate patient selection for perioperative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qi Chen
- Department of Health Statistics, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Robert G Uzzo
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Koon H Rha
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Department of Urology, New York, NY, USA
| | - Elio Mazzone
- OLV Hospital, Aalst, Belgium;ORSI Academy, Melle, Belgium
| | - Jamil Marcus
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Alyssa Danno
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | | - Aeen Asghar
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fady Ghali
- Department of Urology, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Antoin Douglawi
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Institute of Urology & Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology - European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence - Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James Steward
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Ali Al-Qathani
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ahmad Al-Mujalhem
- Department of Urology, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Amit Satish Bhattu
- Department of Urology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Daniel D Eun
- Department of Urology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Linhui Wang
- Department of Urology, Changzheng Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Liedberg F, Abrahamsson J, Bobjer J. Re: Keisuke Shigeta, Kazuhiro Matsumoto, Koichiro Ogihara, et al. Does Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Have Therapeutic Benefit for Node-positive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? Results of a Multi-center Cohort Study. Urol Oncol. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.029: A Plea for Uniform Terminology for Patients with Urothelial Carcinoma Treated with Chemotherapy Before Consolidative Surgery with Curative Intent: Induction Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Eur Urol 2021; 81:e18-e19. [PMID: 34716048 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fredrik Liedberg
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
| | - Johan Abrahamsson
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Johannes Bobjer
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Li CC, Chang CH, Huang CP, Hong JH, Huang CY, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Wu WC, Chung SD, Hsueh TY, Chiu AW, Chen YT, Chen SH, Jiang YH, Tsai YC, Chiang BJ, Lin WY, Jou YC, Wu CC, Lee HY, Yeh HC. Comparing Oncological Outcomes and Surgical Complications of Hand-Assisted, Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Front Oncol 2021; 11:731460. [PMID: 34671556 PMCID: PMC8522474 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.731460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to compare the oncological outcomes and surgical complications of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with different minimally invasive techniques for nephroureterectomy. Methods From the updated data of the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group, a total of 3,333 UTUC patients were identified. After excluding ineligible cases, we retrospectively included 1,340 patients from 15 institutions who received hand-assisted laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (HALNU), laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) or robotic nephroureterectomy (RNU) between 2001 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier estimator and Cox proportional hazards model were used to analyze the survival outcomes, and binary logistic regression model was selected to compare the risks of postoperative complications of different surgical approaches. Results Among the enrolled patients, 741, 458 and 141 patients received HALNU, LNU and RNU, respectively. Compared with RNU (41.1%) and LNU (32.5%), the rate of lymph node dissection in HALNU was the lowest (17.4%). In both Kaplan-Meier and univariate analysis, the type of surgery was significantly associated with overall and cancer-specific survival. The statistical significance of surgical methods on survival outcomes remained in multivariate analysis, where patients undergoing HALNU appeared to have the worst overall (p = 0.007) and cancer-specific (p = 0.047) survival rates among the three groups. In all analyses, the surgical approach was not related to bladder recurrence. In addition, HALNU was significantly associated with longer hospital stay (p = 0.002), and had the highest risk of major Clavien-Dindo complications (p = 0.011), paralytic ileus (p = 0.012), and postoperative end-stage renal disease (p <0.001). Conclusions Minimally invasive surgery can be safe and feasible. We proved that compared with the HALNU group, the LNU and RNU groups have better survival rates and fewer surgical complications. It is crucial to uphold strict oncological principles with sophisticated technique to improve outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to validate our findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Hsiang Chang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jian-Hua Hong
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Mackay Medical College, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Che Wu
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Shiu-Dong Chung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Graduate Program in Biomedical Informatics, College of Informatics, Yuan-Ze University, Chung-Li, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital Renai Branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Allen W Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yeong-Chin Jou
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chih Yeh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: Current Knowledge and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174341. [PMID: 34503152 PMCID: PMC8431384 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) represents a rare and aggressive malignancy arising from the renal pelvis or ureter. It can develop sporadically or have a hereditary origin, such as Lynch syndrome, caused by DNA mismatch repair deficiency, leading to microsatellite instability phenotype. According to molecular characterization studies, UTUC presents different mutational profiles as compared to urinary bladder urothelial carcinomas. In particular, it has been reported that UTUC harbored a higher level of FGFR3 alterations associated with a T-cell depleted immune microenvironment. The therapeutic landscape in urothelial carcinoma is rapidly evolving, with immune checkpoint inhibitors forming part of the standard of care. A greater understanding of the molecular alterations and immune microenvironment leads to the development of new treatment combinations and targeted therapy. This review summarizes the available evidence concerning the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the biological rationale underlying their use in high-grade UTUC.
Collapse
|
32
|
Shigeta K, Matsumoto K, Ogihara K, Murakami T, Anno T, Umeda K, Izawa M, Baba Y, Sanjo T, Shojo K, Tanaka N, Takeda T, Morita S, Kosaka T, Mizuno R, Arita Y, Akita H, Jinzaki M, Kikuchi E, Oya M. Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have therapeutic benefit for node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma? Results of a multi-center cohort study. Urol Oncol 2021; 40:105.e19-105.e26. [PMID: 34454822 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.07.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The indications of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for lymph node-positive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) have not been investigated regarding improved survival outcomes. Our specific aim was to compare the clinical outcomes of clinically node-positive UTUC patients who were treated by NAC followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) or upfront RNU followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Among 966 UTUC patients, we identified 89 with clinical nodal involvement who received either NAC before RNU nor AC after upfront RNU. Cox proportional hazard models were employed to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy modality on the oncological outcomes. RESULTS Of the patient cohort, 36 (40.4%) received NAC followed by RNU, whereas 53 (59.6%) underwent RNU followed by AC. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor size ≥3 cm, clinical T4, and gemcitabine and cisplatin regimen were independent risk factors for disease recurrence, whereas NAC followed by RNU was an independent factor for favorable RFS. Furthermore, regarding cancer-specific survival (CSS), NAC followed by RNU remained an independent factor for favorable CSS. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year and 2-year RFS were 67.9% and 47.0%, respectively, in the NAC+RNU group, which were significantly higher than those in the RNU+AC group (43.9% and 24.6%, respectively, P = 0.006). Moreover, the 1-year and 2-year CSS were 80.5% and 64.2%, respectively, in the NAC+RNU group, which were higher than those in the RNU+AC group (68.6% and 48.2%, respectively, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION For node-positive UTUC patients, NAC followed by RNU was more clinically beneficial than RNU followed by AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keisuke Shigeta
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Koichiro Ogihara
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tetsushi Murakami
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadatsugu Anno
- Department of Urology, Saitama City Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kota Umeda
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mizuki Izawa
- Department of Urology, Kawasaki Municipal Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Urology, Saitama Medical University Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuto Baba
- Department of Urology, International University of Health and Welfare Mita Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tansei Sanjo
- Department of Urology, Isehara Kyodo Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazunori Shojo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa General Hospital, Chiba, Japan; Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Saitama National Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshikazu Takeda
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinya Morita
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takeo Kosaka
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryuichi Mizuno
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Arita
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirotaka Akita
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Jinzaki
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eiji Kikuchi
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Oya
- Department of Urology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yamada Y, Nakagawa T, Miyakawa J, Kawai T, Tabata M, Kaneko T, Taguchi S, Naito A, Hikatsu M, Sato Y, Murata T, Matsumoto A, Miyazaki H, Suzuki M, Enomoto Y, Nishimatsu H, Kondo Y, Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Kume H. Smaller decline of renal function after nephroureterectomy predicts poorer prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicentre retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:1577-1586. [PMID: 34047345 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyab081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Renal function is frequently impaired in the patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the impact of renal function and its change after surgery on survival rates in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. METHODS The study cohort comprised 755 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma who underwent nephroureterectomy between 1995 and 2016 at nine hospitals in Japan. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated using the three-variable Japanese equation for glomerular filtration rate estimation from serum creatinine level and age. Outcomes were recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used. RESULTS Median patients' age was 72 years old. Pre- and post-surgical median estimated glomerular filtration rate were 55.5 and 42.9 ml/min/1.73 m2, respectively. Median estimated glomerular filtration rate decline after surgery, which represents function of the affected side kidney, was 13.1 ml/min/1.73 m2. The 5-year recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals were 68.3, 79.4 and 74.0%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that lower preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate and estimated glomerular filtration rate decline were associated with poorer recurrence-free, cancer-specific and overall survivals, but post-operative estimated glomerular filtration rate was not. Estimated glomerular filtration rate decline was more significant poor-prognosticator than preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. Proportions of the patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 ml/min/1.73 m2 before surgery were 50.6 and 73.2% in organ-confined disease and locally advanced disease, respectively (P < 0.0001). After surgery, they were 91.6 and 89.8%, respectively (P = 0.3896). CONCLUSIONS Lower preoperative renal function, especially of the affected side kidney, was significantly associated with poor prognosis after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Many patients with locally advanced disease have reduced renal function at diagnosis and even more after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukio Yamada
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tohru Nakagawa
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jimpei Miyakawa
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taketo Kawai
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mariko Tabata
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Kaneko
- Department of Urology, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itabashi, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoru Taguchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Akihiro Naito
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hikatsu
- Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Sato
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taro Murata
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Teishin Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hideyo Miyazaki
- Department of Urology, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motofumi Suzuki
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Enomoto
- Department of Urology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Chiyoda, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nishimatsu
- Department of Urology, The Fraternity Memorial Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kondo
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital, Sumida, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takumi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Japan Organization of Occupational Health and Safety Kanto Rosai Hospital, Kawasaki Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Tanaka
- Department of Urology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Musashino, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Haruki Kume
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kim TH, Lee CU, Kang M, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Sung HH. Comparison of oncologic and functional outcomes between radical nephroureterectomy and segmental ureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2021; 11:7828. [PMID: 33837237 PMCID: PMC8035162 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-87573-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to compare oncologic and functional outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and segmental ureterectomy (SU) in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We retrospectively collected data on patients who underwent either RNU or SU of UTUC. Propensity score matching was performed among 394 cases to yield a final cohort of 40 RNU and 40 SU cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to compare overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), progression-free survival (PFS), and intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS) between the groups. We also compared the change in postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). There was no significant difference in terms of CSS, PFS, and IVRFS between the RNU and SU groups, but the RNU group had a better OS than the SU group (p = 0.032). Postoperative eGFR was better preserved in the SU group than in the RNU group (p < 0.001). SU provides comparable CSS, PFS, and IVRFS for patients with UTUC compared to RNU, even in patients with advanced-stage and/or high-grade cancer. Further, SU achieves better preservation of renal function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Chung Un Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Minyong Kang
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81, Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Rodrigues Pessoa R, Morrison JC, Konety B, Gershman B, Maroni P, Kukreja JB, Cost N, Flaig T, Kessler E, Sharma P, Kim SP. National trends in clinical and pathologic staging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:832.e9-832.e15. [PMID: 33820697 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With growing support of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), current biopsy methods are challenging, and little is known as to the degree to which patients would appropriately receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from biopsy alone. Herein, we sought to assess the rates of appropriate clinical use of NAC and identify clinicopathologic factors associated with aggressive UTUC amongst patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically localized disease. METHODS From 2004 to 2013, we identified all treatment naïve patients diagnosed with clinically localized, high grade UTUC (cTa-4Nx) who underwent RNU from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Pathologic criteria for NAC (pT2-4N0,x; pTanyN1) from RNU represented the primary outcome. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify covariates associated with primary outcome to determine appropriate use of NAC. RESULTS During the study interval, 5,362 patients were diagnosed with clinically localized UTUC and underwent RNU. Overall, 49.1% of patients presented with an unknown primary tumor stage (Tx) and 24.5% had invasive UTUC from biopsy. On multivariable analysis, upper tract tumor size was associated with invasive UTUC eligible for NAC (all P < 0.05). Amongst patients with cTx UTUC from biopsy, half of patients had pathologic noninvasive UTUC (pTa,is,1) from RNU and would be overtreated with NAC. CONCLUSION Significant uncertainty persists in assigning primary upper tract tumor depth and represents a key barrier to widespread implementation of NAC for patients with high grade UTUC. Further research is needed to more accurately determine clinical criteria to identify patients for NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey C Morrison
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Rush University Medical Center, Division of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Boris Gershman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Boston, MA
| | - Paul Maroni
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Janet B Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Nicholas Cost
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Thomas Flaig
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Elizabeth Kessler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, TX
| | - Simon P Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Yale University, Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Territo A, Gallioli A, Meneghetti I, Fontana M, Huguet J, Palou J, Breda A. Diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: friend or foe? Arab J Urol 2021; 19:46-58. [PMID: 33763248 PMCID: PMC7954478 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2021.1883810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The European Association of Urology guidelines recommend offering kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumours. Cystoscopy, urinary cytology, and computed tomography urography (CTU) do not always allow correct disease staging and grading, and sometimes there is even a lack of certainty regarding the diagnosis of UTUC. Diagnostic ureteroscopy (d-URS) may therefore be of crucial importance within the diagnostic framework and fundamental in establishing the appropriate therapeutic approach. Evidence acquisition and synthesis A systematic review of the literature was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Risk of bias was assessed using Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions (ROBINS-I). Overall, from 3791 identified records, 186 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. Finally, after a quantitative review of the selected literature, with the full agreement of all authors, 62 studies were considered relevant for this review. Results CTU has a sensitivity and specificity for UTUC of 92% and 95% respectively, but is not able to detect small or flat lesions with adequate accuracy. The sensitivity of voided urinary cytology for UTUC is around 67–76% and ranges from 43% to 78% for selective ureteric urine collection. As no technique offers a diagnosis of certainty, d-URS can allow an increase in diagnostic accuracy. In the present review the pros and cons of d-URS were analysed. This technique may provide additional information in the selection of patients suitable for neoadjuvant chemotherapy or KSS, distinguishing between normal tissue and low- and high-grade UTUC thanks to the emerging technologies. Conclusions Information obtainable from d-URS and ureteroscopic-guided biopsy can prove extremely valuable when the diagnosis of UTUC is doubtful or KSS is being considered. Notwithstanding concerns remain regarding the potential risk of bladder recurrence, cancer dissemination, and/or delay in radical treatment. Abbreviations: CLE: confocal laser endomicroscopy; CSS: cancer-specific survival; CTU: CT urography; d-URS: diagnostic ureteroscopy; EAU: European Association of Urology; HR: hazard ratio; IMAGE1S: Storz professional imaging enhancement system; IVR: intravesical recurrence; KSS: kidney-sparing surgery; MFS: Metastasis-free survival; NAC: neoadjuvant chemotherapy; NBI: narrow-band imaging; OCT: optical coherence tomography; RFS: Recurrence-free survival; RNU: radical nephroureterectomy; ROBINS-I: Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of interventions; URS(-GB): Ureteroscopy(-guided biopsy); UTUC: upper tract urothelial carcinoma; UUT: upper urinary tract
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Territo
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Iacopo Meneghetti
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jordi Huguet
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Urology Department, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kaczmarek K, Lemiński A, Gołąb A, Słojewski M. Survival differences of patients with ureteral versus pelvicalyceal tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Med Sci 2021; 17:603-612. [PMID: 34025829 PMCID: PMC8130483 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Worse survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in the presence of a tumour in the ureter vs. pelvicalyceal tumours is reported in some studies; however, the definition of ureteral involvement (UI) varies across studies. We systematically evaluated evidence regarding the prognostic role of UI in overall and cancer-specific survival of patients with UTUC. MATERIAL AND METHODS A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Knowledge was performed in March 2018. RESULTS The results were presented as a comparison between ureteral vs. pelvicalyceal tumours. A total of 14,895 patients were identified. Cumulative analyses indicated that UI worsens cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), with a pooled HR of 1.52 (p < 0.001) and 1.39 (p = 0.004), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our meta-analysis identified UI in UTUC as an adverse prognostic factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystian Kaczmarek
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Artur Lemiński
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Adam Gołąb
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Marcin Słojewski
- Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Bakar RZ, Köroğlu N, Turkgeldi LS, Tola EN, Cetin BA, Gedikbasi A. Maternal serum procalcitonin levels in prediction of chorioamnionitis in women with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Arch Med Sci 2021; 17:694-699. [PMID: 34025839 PMCID: PMC8130487 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2019.86191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chorioamnionitis is one of the most important maternal complications in the expectant management of patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Procalcitonin (proCT), the precursor of the hormone calcitonin, is used to differentiate bacterial infections from non-bacterial ones. The objective of the study was to determine the efficacy of maternal serum procalcitonin levels in the early prediction of chorioamnionitis in women with PPROM. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study was conducted in 76 pregnant women hospitalized due to PPROM at the maternal-fetal medicine unit of a tertiary center in Istanbul. Patients were followed up with white blood cell (WBC), C-reactive protein (CRP) and proCT levels every 2 days. The values of investigated parameters were recorded at the diagnosis of PPROM and at the time of delivery. The maximum values during the follow-up period were also recorded. RESULTS Out of the 76 patients with PPROM, 15 (19.73%) developed clinical chorioamnionitis. No significant difference could be detected in the gravidity, parity, duration of hospitalization and gestational week at diagnosis between those patients who developed clinical chorioamnionitis and those who did not. The WBC at the time of hospital admittance and before delivery, and CRP levels before delivery were statistically higher in the chorioamnionitis group (p < 0.05). No difference in the proCT levels could be detected either at the time of hospital admittance or before delivery between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Maternal proCT was not found to be predictive of chorioamnionitis. However, since there are reports in the literature that contradict these results, further studies are warranted to determine the true efficacy of proCT in the prediction of clinical chorioamnionitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rabia Zehra Bakar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Erbaa State Hospital, Tokat, Turkey
| | - Nadiye Köroğlu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Esra N. Tola
- Department of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey
| | - Berna Aslan Cetin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Gedikbasi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Health Sciences, Kanuni Sultan Suleyman Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Scotland KB, Hubbard L, Cason D, Banks J, Leong JY, Healy K, Leiby B, Hubosky SG, Bagley DH. Long term outcomes of ureteroscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:850.e17-850.e26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
40
|
Prognostic impact of preoperative renal function in patients treated with radical cystectomy: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:1969-1976. [PMID: 32648134 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01745-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little data on the preoperative prognostic factors in radical cystectomy (RC) patients have made it difficult to choose the appropriate type of urothelial diversion (UD). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of UD, with a subgroup analysis of that of preoperative renal function. METHODS From 1990 to 2015, 279 patients underwent RC for bladder cancer at six hospitals affiliated with Kitasato University in Japan. All patients were divided into three groups: cutaneous ureterostomy (CU; n = 54), ileal conduit (IC; n = 139), and orthotopic neobladder (NB; n = 86). Patients were also stratified into three groups based on preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m2): normal eGFR (> 60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 149), moderately reduced eGFR (45-60 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 66), and severely reduced eGFR (< 45 mL/min/1.73 m2; n = 37). Statistical analyses were performed to investigate prognostic values of UD and preoperative eGFR. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier analyses showed that progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) did not differ between the three types of UD groups. With regard to renal function, the preoperative severely reduced group had significantly worse PFS and CSS than the other groups. The multivariate analysis showed that severely reduced preoperative eGFR was an independent risk factor of worse PFS and worse CSS. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that preoperative severe renal function was shown as an independent risk factor of both PFS and CSS.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hird AE, Magee DE, Cheung DC, Sander B, Sridhar S, Nam RK, Kulkarni GS. Neoadjuvant Versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Microsimulation Model. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2020; 19:e135-e147. [PMID: 33168398 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 10/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is clinically understudied, and there are no definitive recommendations regarding timing of perioperative chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to compare 3 treatment pathways in UTUC: nephroureterectomy (NU) alone, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using a microsimulation model. PATIENTS AND METHODS An individual-level state transition model was constructed using TreeAgePro software to compare treatment strategies for patients with newly diagnosed UTUC. The base case was that of a 70-year-old patient with a radiographically localized upper tract tumor. Primary outcome was quality-adjusted life expectancy. Secondary outcomes included crude overall survival, rates of adverse events, and bladder cancer diagnoses. RESULTS A total of 100,000 patients were simulated. NAC was preferred, with an estimated quality-adjusted life expectancy of 7.50 years versus 6.79 years with NU alone and 7.23 years with AC. Median crude overall survival was 123 months with NAC, 96 months with NU only, and 111 months with AC. Overall, 40.0% of patients in the AC group with invasive pathology completed chemotherapy. In the NAC group, 83.3% of patients completed chemotherapy. In the NAC group, 37.5% of patients experienced an adverse chemotherapy event compared to 15.1% of patients in the AC group. Bladder cancer recurrence rates were 64.9%, 65.9%, and 67.4% over the patient's lifetime for the NU, NAC, and AC strategies, respectively. CONCLUSION This study supports the increased use of NAC in UTUC until robust randomized trials are completed. The ultimate choice should be based on patient and tumor factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda E Hird
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Diana E Magee
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas C Cheung
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Beate Sander
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Srikala Sridhar
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert K Nam
- Division of Urology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Girish S Kulkarni
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Division of Urology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Lec PM, Venkataramana A, Lenis AT, Fero KE, Sharma V, Golla V, Gollapudi K, Blumberg J, Chamie K. Trends in management of ureteral urothelial carcinoma and effects on survival: a hospital-based registry study. Urol Oncol 2020; 39:194.e17-194.e24. [PMID: 33012575 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.08.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High-risk ureteral tumors represent an understudied subset of upper tract urothelial carcinoma, whose surgical management can range from a radical nephroureterectomy (NU) to segmental ureterectomy (SU). OBJECTIVES To evaluate contemporary trends in the management of high-risk ureteral tumors, the utilization of lymphadenectomy and peri-operative chemotherapy, and their impact on overall survival (OS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in the National Cancer Database from years 2006 to 2013 with clinically localized high-risk ureteral tumors treated with NU or SU. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Chi-squared tests were utilized to assess differences in clinicodemographic features and peri-operative treatment delivery between SU and NU cohorts. Cochran-Armitage tests and linear regressions were performed to evaluate temporal trends in treatment utilization. Multivariable logistic regression models were employed to assess predictors of treatment delivery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated associations with OS. RESULTS Of the 1,962 patients included, NU was more commonly performed than SU (72.4%, 1,421/1,962 vs. 27.6%, 541/1,962). Only 22.7% (446/1,962) of the population underwent lymphadenectomy, and 24.8% (271/1,092) of those with advanced pathology (≥pT2 or pN+) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Lymphadenectomy was associated with improved OS in NU patients when more than 3 nodes were removed (hazard ratio [HR] 0.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.89). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy for advanced pathology had no impact OS in both the NU (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.84-1.44) and SU (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.61-1.46) cohorts. Performance of SU was not associated with poorer OS on multivariable analysis (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.21, P = 0.83). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that SU may be an appropriate alternative to NU for the management of high-risk ureteral tumors. Further, lymphadenectomy may play an important role at the time of NU, and adjuvant chemotherapy is infrequently utilized in patients with advanced pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick M Lec
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA.
| | - Abhishek Venkataramana
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Andrew T Lenis
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Katherine E Fero
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Vishnukamal Golla
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Kiran Gollapudi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| | - Jeremy Blumberg
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Institute of Urologic Oncology (IUO), Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kim DK, Cho KS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res 2020; 9:6576-6582. [PMID: 35117267 PMCID: PMC8798340 DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a very uncommon disease that occupies for <5% of all urothelial cancers. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the standard-of-care for UTUC; however, when patients with locally advanced UTUC are treated with RNU only, the recurrence rate is high. Therefore, perioperative chemotherapy has been proposed given the high systemic recurrence rate. Moreover, there is growing evidence that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plays an important role in the treatment of UTUC. Several studies and meta-analyses have reported the beneficial effect of NAC on survival outcomes and pathologic downstaging of patients with UTUC. However, the recommendation of NAC for UTUC is primarily based on level 1 evidence that demonstrated a beneficial effect on survival outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. The chemotherapy regimen for patients with UTUC is also based on that used for patients with bladder cancer. Nevertheless, the use of NAC for UTUC has some limitations, including the possibility of overtreatment. Therefore, selection criteria for NAC are needed, as are further trials to identify the most suitable patients and validate its use in daily clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Do Kyung Kim
- Department of Urology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University Medical College, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang Su Cho
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kaag MG. Perioperative chemotherapy in the management of high risk upper tract urothelial cancers. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1881-1890. [PMID: 32944552 PMCID: PMC7475667 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.03.48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold-standard in the treatment of invasive urothelial cancers of the upper tract (>pT2). However, there are stage-related, postoperative recurrence and cancer-specific death rates that are unacceptably high. Multimodality treatment regimens including neoadjuvant and adjuvant cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy have been studied. While there is a paucity of Level 1 evidence to support either regimen, both have advantages and disadvantages. The provision of chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting is supported by extensive bladder cancer literature, but randomized controlled trials in the upper tract have not been completed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy also risks overtreatment of patients due to the lack of accurate pre-operative staging modalities. On the other hand, adjuvant chemotherapy is supported by the findings of one prospective randomized trial, and eliminates the need for patient selection based on imperfect pre-operative modalities. However, the rigors of surgery and the renal function loss related to nephrectomy, may preclude the provision of adjuvant chemotherapy in a significant subset of patients. One may conclude that multimodal therapy is desirable for oncologic control, but the best means of providing such therapy requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Kaag
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Khan AI, Taylor BL, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Posada Calderon L, Fainberg J, Elahjji R, Shoag J, Scherr DS. Survival Outcomes in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Nationally Representative Analysis. Urology 2020; 146:158-167. [PMID: 32896584 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) on survival outcomes in a contemporary cohort of patients with in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried from 2004 to 2015 to identify subjects who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was performed to compare all-cause mortality between patients who received preoperative chemotherapy to those who did not at each pathologic (p) TNM stage group: T1-4N0, N+, and M+ disease. Associations for all-cause mortality were identified using an adjusted Cox regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 10,315 chemoeligible subjects were included in the analysis. A total of 296 (2.9%) of patients received NAC prior to NU. Kaplan-Meier survival curves of the entire cohort demonstrated an overall survival advantage associated with administration of NAC (P = .017). Stratified by clinical staging, subjects with nonorgan-confined tumors had improved overall survival outcomes with NAC administration (P = .012). On multivariate analysis there was a statistically significant improvement in overall survival between in patients who received NAC. Of patients in the preoperative chemotherapy group who had clinically nonorgan-confined disease, 27.1% had organ-confined disease at time of surgery compared to 1.4% of those who underwent surgery as initial therapy. CONCLUSION In a contemporary cohort of subjects who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC, administration of NAC in patients with high-grade nonorgan-confined disease led to higher rates of pathologic downstaging and was associated with improved overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aleem I Khan
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | - Rahmi Elahjji
- Department of Urology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Sui W, Wallis CJD, Luckenbaugh AN, Barocas DA, Chang SS, Penson DF, Resnick MJ, Laviana AA. The Impact of Hospital Volume on Short-term and Long-term Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2020; 147:135-142. [PMID: 32891638 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.07.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 06/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the effect of hospital volume on short and long-term outcomes for radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx). Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare malignancy that few surgeons have experience with. The hospital volume-outcome relationship has been well established for other cancers but not RNUx. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for all cases of upper tract urothelial carcinoma that underwent RNUx from 2004 to 2016. Average annual hospital volume for radical nephroureterectomy was stratified into tertiles. The upper tertile, defined as 6 or more RNUx per year, was considered high volume while low volume was less than 6 RNUx per year. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression were used to identify independent predictors of overall survival, and logistic regression was used to identify predictors of perioperative outcomes. RESULTS We identified 37,479 RNUx performed across 1290 hospitals. There were no differences in baseline health or cancer staging between patients who presented at low- versus high-volume centers. Both peri-operative survival (30- and 90-day mortality) and long-term overall survival were improved in patients treated at high-volume centers. On multivariable survival analysis, treatment at a high-volume center was associated with improved hazards of survival. This relationship for long-term survival remained consistent on landmark analysis where patients who died within 90 days of surgery were removed. CONCLUSIONS Treatment at a high-volume hospital was associated not only with improved short-term perioperative outcomes but also with improved overall long-term survival. The mechanism behind this is likely multifactorial with surgeon volume, and ancillary support services all playing critical roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wilson Sui
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | | | - Amy N Luckenbaugh
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Daniel A Barocas
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Sam S Chang
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - David F Penson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Matthew J Resnick
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Aaron A Laviana
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Leow JJ, Chong YL, Chang SL, Valderrama BP, Powles T, Bellmunt J. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A 2020 Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, and Future Perspectives on Systemic Therapy. Eur Urol 2020; 79:635-654. [PMID: 32798146 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT To improve the prognosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), clinicians have used neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) before or after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Despite some new data, the evidence remains mixed on their efficacy. OBJECTIVE To update the current evidence on the role of NAC and AC for UTUC. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We searched for all studies investigating NAC or AC for UTUC in Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings up to February 2020. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS For NAC, the pooled pathologic complete response rate (≤ypT0N0M0) was 11% (n = 811) and pathologic partial response rate (≤ypT1N0M0) was 43% (n = 869), both across 14 studies. Across six studies, the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.32-0.59, p < 0.001) for overall survival (OS) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.24-0.61, p < 0.001) for cancer-specific survival (CSS) in favor of NAC. The evidence for NAC is at best level 2. As for AC, there was a benefit in OS (pooled HR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92, p = 0.004 across 14 studies and 7983 patients), CSS (pooled HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.69-0.91, p = 0.001 across 18 studies and 5659 patients), and disease-free survival (DFS; pooled HR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.38-0.70 across four studies and 602 patients). While most studies were retrospective (level 2 evidence), there were two prospective randomized trials providing level 1 evidence. There are currently four phase 2 trials on neoadjuvant immunotherapy and three phase 2 trials on adjuvant immunotherapy for UTUC. CONCLUSIONS NAC for UTUC confers a favorable pathologic response and tumor downstaging rate, and an OS and CSS benefit compared with RNU alone. AC confers an OS, CSS, and DFS benefit compared with RNU alone. Currently, the evidence for AC appears stronger (with positive level 1 evidence) than that for NAC (at best level 2 evidence). Limited data are available for chemoimmunotherapy approaches, but preliminary data support an active research investment. PATIENT SUMMARY After a comprehensive search of the latest studies examining the role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial cancer, the pooled evidence shows that perioperative chemotherapy was beneficial for prolonging survival; however, the evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy was stronger than that for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J Leow
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore; Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Yew Lam Chong
- Department of Urology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Steven L Chang
- Division of Urology and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Begoña P Valderrama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
| | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Barts Health and the Royal Free NHS Trusts, London, UK
| | - Joaquim Bellmunt
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and PSMAR-IMIM Research Lab, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Braun AE, Srivastava A, Maffucci F, Kutikov A. Controversies in management of the bladder cuff at nephroureterectomy. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1868-1880. [PMID: 32944551 PMCID: PMC7475677 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.01.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) accounts for roughly 5% of urothelial carcinomas. Historically, the gold standard for high-risk or bulky low-risk UTUC was an open radical nephroureterectomy with formal bladder cuff excision (BCE). The development of novel endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic techniques has transformed this operation, yet no level I evidence exists at present that demonstrates the superiority of one strategy over another. While new approaches to nephroureterectomy in the last decade have shifted the management paradigm to decrease the morbidity of surgery, controversy continues to surround the approach to the distal ureter and bladder cuff. Debate continues within the urologic community over which surgical approach is best when managing UTUC and how various approaches impact clinical outcomes such as intravesical recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS) and disease-specific mortality (DSM). When focusing on the existing treatment algorithm, key metrics of quality include (I) removal of the entire specimen en bloc, (II) minimizing the risk of tumor and urine spillage, (III) R0 resection, and (IV) water-tight closure allowing for early use of prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy. In the absence of robust evidence demonstrating a single superior approach, the urologic surgeon should base decisions on technical comfort and each patient's particular clinical circumstance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery E Braun
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Abhishek Srivastava
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Fenizia Maffucci
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexander Kutikov
- Division of Urologic Oncology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Inokuchi J, Yokomizo A, Nishiyama N, Kitamura H, Eto M, Nishiyama H, Tomita Y. Perioperative therapies for urological cancers. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2020; 50:357-367. [PMID: 32115649 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2019] [Revised: 01/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Although surgery with curative intent is critical for management of many localized cancers, multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy has been introduced to increase the effectiveness of local control of surgery and prolong survival. However, strong evidence supporting the utility of such multimodal therapy is limited. The utility of perioperative chemotherapy has been extensively investigated in bladder cancer, and several randomized controlled trials have indicated the benefit of neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Regrettably, perioperative therapy for other urological cancers is controversial; therefore, no definitive conclusions have been drawn. Recently, the number of trials has rapidly increased due to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, used alone or in combination with other modalities. In this review, we summarize the current status and supporting evidence for perioperative therapies such as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies for urological cancers, including prostate cancer, urothelial cancer and renal cell carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Inokuchi
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | | | - Naotaka Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama
| | - Hiroshi Kitamura
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences for Research, University of Toyama, Toyama
| | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University
| | - Hiroyuki Nishiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki
| | - Yoshihiko Tomita
- Departments of Urology and Molecular Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 480] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|