1
|
Oedorf K, Haug ES, Liedberg F, Järvinen R, Gudjonsson S, Boström PJ, Jerlström T, Gudbrandsdottir G, Jensen JB, Lam GW. Perioperative management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma in the Nordic countries. BMC Urol 2024; 24:132. [PMID: 38914985 PMCID: PMC11197368 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-024-01515-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare malignancy, with typically only few new cases annually per urological department. Adherence to European association of urology (EAU) guidelines on UTUC in the Nordic countries is unknown. The objective of this survey was to examine the implementation of EAU guidelines, the perioperative management and organization of the treatment of UTUC in the Nordic countries. METHODS The electronic survey was distributed to 93 hospitals in the Nordic countries performing radical nephroureterectomy (NU). The survey consisted of 57 main questions and data was collected between December 1st, 2021 and April 23rd, 2022. RESULTS Overall response rate was 47/93 (67%) with a completion rate of 98%. Five out of the 6 examined subjects on diagnostic practice are applied by ≥ 72% of the participating centers. NU as treatment for high-risk UTUC is performed by 37/47 (79%), and 91% include a bladder cuff excision. CONCLUSIONS Adherence to EAU guidelines is high on diagnostic practice in the Nordic countries, whereas disease management is less coherent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimie Oedorf
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Urology, Skaanes Universitetssjukhus, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Riikka Järvinen
- Department of Urology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sigurdur Gudjonsson
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Urology, University of Iceland, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Peter J Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Tomas Jerlström
- Department of Urology, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | | | | | - Gitte Wrist Lam
- Department of Urology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yip W, Assel MJ, Wong NC, Tracey AT, Alvim RG, Nogueira L, Almassi N, Singla N, Clinton TN, Sjoberg DD, Al-Ahmadie H, Hakimi AA, Pietzak EJ, Cha EK, Donahue TF, Dalbagni G, Bochner BH, Bajorin DF, Coleman JA. Changes in the Perioperative Management and Outcomes of Patients With Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center: Over 20 Years of Experience. UROLOGY PRACTICE 2024; 11:356-366. [PMID: 38315829 PMCID: PMC11323897 DOI: 10.1097/upj.0000000000000507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We evaluated surgical trends, perioperative management evolution, and oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at a tertiary cancer center over a 24-year period. METHODS Between 1995 and 2018, we evaluated 743 consecutive patients with UTUC who underwent RNU. Generalized additive models were used to estimate the associations between date of surgery and continuous outcomes using a linear model, dichotomous outcomes using a logit link, categorical outcomes using multinomial models, and 2- and 5-year survival outcomes using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Over the study period, preoperative diagnostic endoscopic biopsies increased from 10% to 66%, along with the proportion of patients who underwent RNU for high-grade disease from 55% to 91%. The rate of open RNU declined from 100% to 56% with a rise in minimally invasive approaches. Median lymph node yield increased with more retroperitoneal lymph node dissections performed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy utilization increased with a contemporary utilization rate of 32%, coinciding with an increase in pT0 rate from 2% to 8%. Cancer-specific survival probabilities improved over the study period, while metastasis-free and overall survival remained stable. CONCLUSIONS We found several changes in treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with UTUC over the past 2 decades. How individual alterations in management factors, such as patient selection, perioperative chemotherapy, lymphadenectomy, and salvage therapies, impact patient outcomes is challenging in the setting of multiple overlapping practice changes for this rare disease and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesley Yip
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Melissa J. Assel
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nathan C. Wong
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew T. Tracey
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ricardo G. Alvim
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Lucas Nogueira
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nima Almassi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nirmish Singla
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy N. Clinton
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Daniel D. Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hikmat Al-Ahmadie
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - A. Ari Hakimi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene J. Pietzak
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eugene K. Cha
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Timothy F. Donahue
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Guido Dalbagni
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bernard H. Bochner
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dean F. Bajorin
- Genitourinary Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan A. Coleman
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dłubak A, Karwacki J, Logoń K, Tomecka P, Brawańska K, Krajewski W, Szydełko T, Małkiewicz B. Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2023; 25:1327-1344. [PMID: 37801187 PMCID: PMC10640513 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-023-01460-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Dłubak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Logoń
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Tomecka
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Kinga Brawańska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Deb AA, Agag A, Naushad N, Hartley A, Serag H. The Role of Lymph Node Dissection in the Management of Upper Urothelial Cancer: A Nodal Status-Based Meta-Analytical Study. UROLOGY RESEARCH & PRACTICE 2023; 49:345-359. [PMID: 37982446 PMCID: PMC10765198 DOI: 10.5152/tud.2023.23045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review was performed to study the prognostic value of lymph node dissection (LND) during nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Five databases were searched on September 11, 2022, to include studies that compared whether LND was performed, the extent of dissection (complete vs. incomplete), and the nodal status (positive "pN+" vs. negative "pN0"). Outcomes included prognosis (overall survival "OS," cancer-specific survival "CSS," disease-free survival "DFS," and recurrence-free survival "RFS") and complications. High-grade complications (≥ grade 3 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification). Data analysis were conducted through STATA. The pooled data are reported log odds ratio (logOR) with 95% CI. Thirty-three studies were analyzed. The LND resulted in improved 5-year OS [logOR=0.10; 95% CI: 0.06-0.15], 5-year CSS [logOR=0.10; 95% CI: 0.04- 0.17], and 10-year CSS [logOR=0.14; 95% CI: 0.06-0.21] when compared to non-LND. However, LND was associated with greater risk of high-grade complications [logOR=0.62; 95% CI: 0.26-0.98]. Complete LND was associated with lower risk of cancer-specific mortality than incomplete LND [logOR=-0.69; 95% CI: -1.22--0.16]. The pN0 patients had better 5-year OS; however, pN+ patients had better prognosis in DFS, RFS (at 2 and 5 years), and CSS (at 2, 5, and 10 years). Lymph node dissection provides a protective role in terms of 5-year OS and 5-year and 10-year CSS among UTUC patients. However, it is associated with higher risk of high-grade complications. The extent of dissection plays a minor prognostic role, while the positivity of resected nodes has great prognostic value in UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdalla Ali Deb
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Ayman Agag
- Department of Urology, Frimley Park Hospital, Camberley, UK
| | - Naufal Naushad
- Department of Urology, North Tees University Hospital, Stockton, UK
| | - Alice Hartley
- Department of Urology, South Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, Sunderland, UK
| | - Hosam Serag
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shi Y, Wang S, Liu W, Sherryn S, Lei Z, Yang L, Gao Q, Liu Z, Xu Z, Wan H, Zhang B. Single-Position Complete Retroperitoneoscopic Radical Nephroureterectomy with Bladder Cuff Excision for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Endourol 2023; 37:768-774. [PMID: 36641634 PMCID: PMC10354305 DOI: 10.1089/end.2022.0491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We proposed a new technique, single-position complete retroperitoneoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (SCRNU), which proved to be efficient for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Materials and Methods: In this study, we retrospectively evaluated 86 patients diagnosed with UTUC at our hospital from June 2013 to June 2021. The patients who underwent traditional retroperitoneoscopic nephroureterectomy (TRNU) (n = 28) and SCRNU (n = 58) were consecutively enrolled. Demographic characteristics, perioperative parameters, and follow-up data were collected and compared between the two groups. Results: Both procedures were performed effectively in 86 patients without converting to open surgery. The mean follow-up time was 45.4 months for the SCRNU group and 39 months for the TRNU group. All follow-up patients survived without incidence of bladder incision tumor. Further, the follow-up results showed that there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate of bladder tumor between the two methods. SCRNU group was superior to TRNU group because of shorter operating time, fewer perioperative complications, less postoperative pain, lower recurrence rate, and cheaper medical expenditure. Conclusions: The SCRNU technique is less invasive, have fewer complications, and has a better cosmetic outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqiang Shi
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Shenghan Wang
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | | | - Zhentao Lei
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Yang
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Gao
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongping Liu
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Xu
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Wan
- Beijing USCI Medical Laboratory, Beijing, China
| | - Bao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Aerospace Center Hospital, Beijing, China
- Peking University Aerospace Clinic School of Medicine, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wu DJ, Wong MN, Lee CT, Zynger DL. The Stratification of Positive Lymph Nodes into pN1 and pN2 for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma is not Prognostically Significant. Hum Pathol 2023; 137:48-55. [PMID: 37088434 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2023.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
The 3rd-7th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer had 3 categories for positive lymph nodes (pN1-3) in upper urinary tract carcinoma. The 8th edition removed pN3, defining pN1 as one lymph node with tumor deposit ≤ 2 cm and pN2 as a node with tumor deposit > 2 cm or metastases in multiple nodes. The aim of this study was to assess if the current pN categories impact survival in renal pelvic and ureteral carcinoma. Nephroureterectomies performed at our institution for primary upper urinary tract carcinoma between 2010-2019 were reviewed. Lymphadenectomy was performed in 73.3% of cases (151/206, median 9 nodes). Eighty-one (53.6%) patients were deceased at last review [pN0, 53 (44.5%); pN1-2, 28 (87.5%)]. There was no difference in overall or recurrence free survival between pN1 and pN2 with 5-year overall survival (95% confidence interval) of pN0, 60.7% (52.0-70.8%); pN1, 15.4% (4.3-35.2%); and pN2, 21.1% (8.8-40.3%). The metastatic deposit size threshold of 2 cm, number of positive lymph nodes, as well as extranodal extension did not correlate with overall or recurrence free survival. As such, pN1 and pN2 were grouped together with a 5-year overall survival of 18.8% (9.12-28.6%). The current stratification of upper urinary tract carcinoma into pN1 and pN2 does not provide prognostic information, and both yield a stage IV classification, regardless of pT or pM category. Therefore, we recommend further simplification of pN classification into one category for regional lymph node metastasis, irrespective of lymph node deposit size or number of positive lymph nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology. the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rouprêt M, Seisen T, Birtle AJ, Capoun O, Compérat EM, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Gürses Andersson I, Liedberg F, Mariappan P, Hugh Mostafid A, Pradere B, van Rhijn BWG, Shariat SF, Rai BP, Soria F, Soukup V, Wood RG, Xylinas EN, Masson-Lecomte A, Gontero P. European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update. Eur Urol 2023; 84:S0302-2838(23)02652-0. [PMID: 36967359 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 130.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab). CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France.
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Alison J Birtle
- Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Otakar Capoun
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eva M Compérat
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Pathology, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Paris
| | | | | | - Fredrik Liedberg
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden; Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Paramananthan Mariappan
- Department of Urology, Edinburgh Bladder Cancer Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK
| | - A Hugh Mostafid
- Department of Urology, The Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, La Croix Du Sud Hospital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Bas W G van Rhijn
- Department of Urology, Caritas St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany; Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital Motol and 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - Bhavan P Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| | - Viktor Soukup
- Department of Urology, General Teaching Hospital and 1st Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Praha, Prague, Czechia; Department of Pathology, General Hospital of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Evanguelos N Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, AP-HP, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, Città della Salute e della Scienza, University of Torino School of Medicine, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Comparison between robot-assisted versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: outcomes from a pooled analysis. J Robot Surg 2023:10.1007/s11701-023-01551-9. [PMID: 36884204 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01551-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between robot-assisted nephroureterectomy (RANU) and open nephroureterectomy (ONU) for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). We systematically searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) to locate pertinent studies published in English up to January 2023. The primary outcomes evaluated included perioperative results, complications, and oncologic outcomes. Statistical analyses and calculations were performed using Review Manager 5.4. The study was registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022383035). In total, eight comparative trials, including 37,984 patients were enrolled. Compared to ONU, RANU was associated with a significantly shorter length of stay (weighted mean difference [WMD] - 1.63 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 2.90, - 0.35; p = 0.01), less blood loss (WMD - 107.04 mL, 95% CI - 204.97, - 9.11; p = 0.03), less major complication(OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.70, 0.88; p < 0.0001), and lower positive surgical margin (PSM) (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12, 0.92; p = 0.03). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in operative time, transfusion rates, rate of lymph node dissection, lymph node yield, overall complications, overall survival, cancer-specific survival, recurrence-free survival, and progression-free survival. RANU has superior advantages compared to ONU in terms of length of hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, and PSM, while providing comparable oncologic outcomes in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
|
9
|
Peng L, Mehmud I, Meng C, Tang D, Li K, Gan L, Li J, Yi F, Li Y. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes and Complications of Laparoscopic and Robotic Nephroureterectomy Approaches in Patients with Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3805-3816. [PMID: 36879036 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13221-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For medical institutions without robotic equipment, it remains uncertain whether laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LNU) can achieve results similar to those of robotic surgery for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy (RANU) with that of LNU using a large sample size of patients. METHODS A systematic meta-analysis was performed using data (available to May 2022) acquired from multiple scientific databases. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) guidelines, according to the protocols registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021264046), were followed to perform this cumulative analysis. RESULTS Nine high-quality studies were included in this analysis, considering factors such as operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), length of hospital stay (LOS), positive surgical margins (PSM), and complications. Statistical indicators revealed no significant differences between the RANU and LNU groups in terms of OT (weighted mean difference [WMD] 29.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.10 to 59.92; p = 0.22), EBL (WMD -55.30, 95% CI -171.14 to 60.54; p = 0.13), LOS (WMD -0.39, 95% CI -1.03 to 0.25; p = 0.12), PSM (odds ratio [OR] 1.22, 95% CI 0.44-3.36; p = 0.17], or complications (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.49-1.69; p = 0.13). CONCLUSION The meta-analysis showed that the perioperative and safety indicators of both RANU and LNU were similar and both showed favorable outcomes in UTUC treatment. However, some uncertainties remain in the implementation and selection of lymph nodes for dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Peng
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.,Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, China.,Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.,South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Irfan Mehmud
- Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.,South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Chunyang Meng
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, China
| | - Dongdong Tang
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Lanzhou University Medical School, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.,Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Luohu Hospital Group), Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.,South China Hospital, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Kangsen Li
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, China
| | - Lijian Gan
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, China
| | - Jinze Li
- Department of Urology, Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Fulin Yi
- North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - Yunxiang Li
- Department of Urology, Nanchong Central Hospital, The Second Clinical College, North Sichuan Medical College (University), Nanchong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cui Y, Lu Y, Wu J, Quan C. Benefits of lymphadenectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma only located in the lower ureter: a bicentre retrospective cohort study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1115830. [PMID: 37124512 PMCID: PMC10140303 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1115830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and highly malignant urothelial tumor originating from the renal pelvis and ureter associated with poor prognosis. It has been established that 70% of ureteral tumors occur in the lower ureter. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with ipsilateral bladder cuff excision is regarded as the standard treatment for UTUC. Current evidence supports the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in determining tumor staging, but no consensus has been reached on the potential survival benefits. The present study retrospectively analyzed cases of UTUC limited to the lower ureter to evaluate the survival benefits of LND during RNU. Methods The present study retrospectively analyzed data from patients with UTUC limited to the lower ureter from two medical centers from 2000 to 2016 and assessed the survival outcomes, including recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). During subgroup analysis, we stratified by pathological tumor (pT) stages and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). Results The study cohort included 297 patients separated into LND (n=111) and non-LND (n=186) groups. The two groups were comparable except for the pathological N stage. The LND group was associated with superior survival in terms of RFS (27.0% vs. 18.3%, p=0.044) and CSS (53.2 vs. 39.8%, p=0.031) compared to the non-LND group (n=186). In pT2-4 patients, the LND group was associated with better 3-year RFS (50.5% vs. 32.3%, p<0.05), 5-year RFS (29.7% vs. 12.0%, p<0.05), and overall RFS (18.7% vs. 6.0%, p<0.05) than the non-LND group. Besides, the LND group was associated with a significantly better 3-year CSS (68.1% vs. 49.6%, p=0.003), 5-year CSS (51.6% vs. 30.8%, p<0.05) and overall CSS (45.1% vs. 24.1%, p<0.05). In patients that underwent AC, the LND group had better survival benefits in terms of RFS (29.4 vs. 16.7%, p=0.023) and CSS (52.9% vs. 40.5%, p=0.038) compared to the non-LND group. Conclusion LND has survival benefits in patients with UTUC localized to the lower ureter, especially for≥pT2 stage UTUC and AC cohorts. Overall, the therapeutic effect of LND in UTUC cannot be replaced by AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yupeng Cui
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Youyi Lu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
| | - Jitao Wu
- Department of Urology, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, Shandong, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| | - Changyi Quan
- Department of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
- *Correspondence: Changyi Quan, ; Jitao Wu,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Xia HR, Li SG, Zhai XQ, Liu M, Guo XX, Wang JY. The Value of Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Node-Positive Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:889144. [PMID: 35785156 PMCID: PMC9245452 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PurposeThe value of lymphadenectomy during radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effects of the removed lymph node (RLN) counts, positive lymph node (pLN) counts, and pLN density (pLND) on survival outcomes in patients with node-positive upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).MethodsA total of 306 patients with node-positive UTUC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2016 were identified. Multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of RLN counts, pLN counts, and pLND on survival outcomes. The maximally selected rank statistics were used to determine the most informative cutoff value for pLND on survival outcomes.ResultsThe RLN counts or pLN counts were not associated with survival outcomes, whereas higher pLND was associated with lower cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.75, P = 0.014 and HR 1.62, P = 0.036, respectively]. The most informative cutoff value for pLND in relation to survival was 27%. Patients with pLND ≥27% had worse 5-year survival rates than those with pLND <27% (52.9% vs. 75.9% for CSS and 18.7% vs. 34.2% for OS, each P < 0.05). Furthermore, the multivariable Cox regression model with pLND could predict 5-year CSS (AUC 0.732 vs. 0.647) or OS (AUC 0.704 vs. 0.621) more accurately than the model without pLND.ConclusionsFor patients with node-positive UTUC, more lymph nodes removed do not offer a better therapeutic effect. However, pLND provides additional prognostic value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao-ran Xia
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-guang Li
- Department of Urology, Zoucheng People`s Hospital, Zoucheng, China
| | - Xing-quan Zhai
- Department of Urology, Zoucheng People`s Hospital, Zoucheng, China
| | - Min Liu
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao-xiao Guo
- Department of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jian-ye Wang, ; Xiao-xiao Guo,
| | - Jian-ye Wang
- Department of urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology; Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Science, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Jian-ye Wang, ; Xiao-xiao Guo,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Veccia A, Carbonara U, Djaladat H, Mehrazin R, Eun D, Reese AC, Meng X, Uzzo R, Srivastava A, Porter JR, Farrow J, Jamil M, Rosiello G, Tellini R, Mari A, Al-Qathani A, Rha KH, Wang L, Mastroianni R, Ferro M, De Cobelli O, Hakimi K, Crocerossa F, Ghoreifi A, Cacciamani G, Amit S Bhattu A, Mottrie A, Abdollah F, Minervini A, Wu Z, Simone G, Derweesh IH, Gonzalgo ML, Margulis V, Sundaram CP, Autorino R. Robotic vs laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multicenter propensity-score matched pair "tetrafecta" analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group). J Endourol 2022; 36:752-759. [PMID: 35019760 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the outcomes of robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RRNU) and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU) within a large multi-institutional worldwide dataset. MATERIAL AND METHODS The ROBotic surgery for Upper tract Urothelial cancer STudy (ROBUUST) includes data from 17 centers worldwide regarding 877 RRNU and LRNU performed between 2015 and 2019. Baseline features, perioperative and oncological outcomes, were included. A 2:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching with a 0.001 caliper was performed. An univariable and a multivariable logistic regression model were built to evaluate the predictors of a composite "tetrafecta" outcome defined as occurrence of bladder cuff excision + LND + no complications + negative surgical margins. RESULTS After matching, 185 RRNU and 91 LRNU were assessed. Patients in the RRNU group were more likely to undergo bladder cuff excision (81.9% vs 63.7%; p<0.001) compared to the LRNU group. A statistically significant difference was found in terms of overall postoperative complications (p=0.003) and length of stay (p<0.001) in favor of RRNU. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that LRNU was an independent predictor negatively associated with achievement of "tetrafecta" (OR: 0.09; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS In general, RRNU and LRNU offer comparable outcomes. While the rate of overall complications is higher for LRNU in this study population, this is mostly related to low grade complications, and therefore with more limited clinical relevance. RRNU seems to offer shorter hospital stay but this might also be related to the different geographical location of participating centers. Overall, the implementation of robotics might facilitate achievement of a "tetrafecta" outcome as defined in the present study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Veccia
- Spedali Civili Hospital, University of Brescia, Department of Urology, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, Brescia, Italy, 25123;
| | - Umberto Carbonara
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 6887, Department of Urology, 11200 E BROAD ST, RICHMOND, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23233.,Università degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, 9295, Department of Urology, Bari, Puglia, Italy;
| | | | - Reza Mehrazin
- Mount Sinai Health System, 5944, Urology, 5 East 98th St, 6th floor, New York, New York, United States, 10029;
| | - Daniel Eun
- Temple University, Urology, 255 South 17th street, 7th Floor Urology Suite, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103;
| | - Adam C Reese
- Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Urology, 3401 N Broad St., Suite 340, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140;
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Urology, Dallas, Texas, United States;
| | - Robert Uzzo
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, 6565, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111;
| | | | - James Robert Porter
- Swedish Medical Center, Urology, 1101 Madison, Suite 1400, Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104;
| | - Jason Farrow
- Indiana University Health, 22529, Urology, 535 N Barnhill, Suite 150, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46206-1367;
| | | | - Giuseppe Rosiello
- San Raffaele Hospital, 9372, Urology, Via Olgettina, 52, Milano, Italy, 20132;
| | - Riccardo Tellini
- University Hospital Careggi, 18561, Department of Oncologic, Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, Toscana, Italy, 50134;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy., Urology, Largo Brambilla 3, Firenze, Italy, 50100.,University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy.;
| | | | - Koon Ho Rha
- Severance Hospital, Yonsei University, Urology, Yonseiro 50-1, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of);
| | - Linhui Wang
- Changzheng Hospital, 56652, Shanghai, Shanghai, China;
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 9290, Urology , via ripamonti 435, Milano, Italy, 90020.,Italy;
| | | | | | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Virginia Commonwealth University, 6889, 1200 E Broad St, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23284-2512;
| | | | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- AOUI Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Urology, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, Italy, 37100;
| | | | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis, 37467, Dep. of Urology, Aalst, Belgium, 9300;
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Henry Ford Health System, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Center for Outcomes Research Analytics and Evaluation, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202;
| | - Andrea Minervini
- Department of Urology, University of Florence, Careggi Hospital, Florence, Italy., Urology, Clinica Urologica I, Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Università di Firenze., Largo Brambilla 3 - San Luca Nuovo Padiglione 16/Settore C/Piano II, Florence, Italy, 50134;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai hospital, the second military medical university, the department of Urology, Changhai Road NO. 163, Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200433;
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Regina Elena, urology, via elio chianesi 53, Roma, Italy, 00144.,Italy;
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- University of California - San Diego, Urology, La Jolla, California, United States;
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- university of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, urology, Miami, Florida, United States;
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- UT Southwestern Medical, Urology, 5339 harry hines blvd, Dallas, Texas, United States, 75390;
| | - Chandru P Sundaram
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Urology, 535 N Barnhill Dr, Suite 420, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202;
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 6887, Surgery (Urology), 1200 East Broad st, Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298;
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Robot-assisted versus open radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: A retrospective cohort study across ten years. Surg Oncol 2021; 38:101607. [PMID: 34022505 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radical nephroureterectomy is the gold standard of treatment for high-risk non-metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. However, the optimal surgical approach remains a controversial debate. This study compared the perioperative and oncological outcomes of open and robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomies. METHODS 131 consecutive radical nephroureterectomies (66 robot-assisted nephroureterectomies vs. 65 open nephroureterectomies) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a single tertiary referral center were included from 2009 to 2019. The perioperative and oncological outcomes were compared between both surgical approaches, including logistic regression analysis, propensity score matching, Kaplan Meier analyses, and Cox regression models. RESULTS Overall, robot-assisted surgery had less blood loss (150 ml vs. 250, p = 0.004) and less positive surgical margins (1.5% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.004) at a comparable operating time (robotic 188min vs. 178). Any grade complications were more frequent after open surgery (40.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.011), and the length of stay was shorter after robotic nephroureterectomy (9 days vs. 12, p < 0.001). These differences remained significant in the propensity score matched analysis, except for the complication rates, which were still lower for the robotic approach, but no longer significant. At a median follow-up of 30.9 months (range 1.4-129.5), neither the progression-free survival (PFS, 2-year: robotic 66.7% vs. open 55.3%), nor the overall survival differed significantly (OS, 2-year: robotic 76.2% vs. open 68.4%). In the Cox regression, the surgical approach did not impact the PFS or OS. Lymph node metastases (HR 3.32, p = 0.008) had the strongest impact on the PFS besides patient age (HR 1.51 per 10 years, p = 0.025) and prior cystectomy (HR 2.42, p = 0.026) in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy had significant perioperative advantages at comparable oncological outcomes compared to open surgery for the treatment of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract at a high volume center, experienced in robotic surgery.
Collapse
|
14
|
Barton GJ, Tan WP, Inman BA. The nephroureterectomy: a review of technique and current controversies. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:3168-3190. [PMID: 33457289 PMCID: PMC7807352 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
The nephroureterectomy (NU) is the standard of care for invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and has been around for well over one hundred years. Since then new operative techniques have emerged, new technologies have developed, and the surgery continues to evolve and grow. In this article, we review the various surgical techniques, as well as present the literature surrounding current areas of debate surrounding the NU, including the lymphatic drainage of the upper urinary tract, management of UTUC involvement with the adrenals and caval thrombi, surgical management of the distal ureter, the use of intravesical chemotherapy as well as perioperative systemic chemotherapy, as well as various outcome measures. Although much has been studied about the NU, there still is a dearth of level 1 evidence and the field would benefit from further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory J Barton
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Wei Phin Tan
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Brant A Inman
- Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kenigsberg AP, Smith W, Meng X, Ghandour R, Rapoport L, Bagrodia A, Lotan Y, Woldu SL, Margulis V. Robotic Nephroureterectomy vs Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy: Increased Utilization, Rates of Lymphadenectomy, Decreased Morbidity Robotically. J Endourol 2020; 35:312-318. [PMID: 33081512 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction and Objective: Robotic radical nephroureterectomy (RRNU) may offer advantages over laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy (LRNU). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) who underwent RRNU vs LRNU and identify factors that account for differences. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2016 for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th/7th edition Stage I/II/III UTUC. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared LRNU and RRNU OS. Univariate analysis detected differences between the groups. Cox regression determined factors associated with mortality rate. Logistic regression identified predictors of a lymph node dissection (LND) and 90-day mortality rate. Results: A total of 2631 patients met the criteria, 1129 of whom underwent RRNU and 1502 LRNU, with a follow-up of 33 and 35 months, respectively (p = 0.063). RRNU had a median OS of 71.1 vs 62.6 months (p = 0.033). LRNU patients were older (72.7 vs 71.4, p < 0.001) and had no differences in comorbidities, pathologic T stage, or grade. The LRNU cohort was less likely to undergo LND (19% vs 35%, p < 0.001) and had a lower median lymph node yield (3 vs 4, p < 0.001). LRNU patients more likely underwent conversion to an open procedure, had longer hospital stays, and higher 30- and 90-day mortality rates. LRNU was independently associated with mortality rate (p = 0.030). Age, grade, positive margins, pT/pN stage were associated with mortality rate. Younger age, RRNU, surgery at an academic center, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicted an LND. Conclusions: RRNU demonstrated increased rates of LND and may offer a short-term morbidity benefit to LRNU. Survival differences may be due to improved characterization of disease through LND.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander P Kenigsberg
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Wesley Smith
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Leonid Rapoport
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Yair Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Solomon L Woldu
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu SW, Woody NM, Wei W, Appachi S, Contrera KJ, Tsai JC, Ghanem AI, Matia B, Joshi NP, Geiger JL, Ku JA, Burkey BB, Scharpf J, Prendes BL, Caudell JJ, Dunlap NE, Adelstein DJ, Porceddu S, Liu H, Siddiqui F, Lee NY, Koyfman S, Lamarre ED. Evaluating compliance with process-related quality metrics and survival in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: Multi-institutional oral cavity collaboration study. Head Neck 2020; 43:60-69. [PMID: 32918373 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26454] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2020] [Revised: 08/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Process-related measures have been proposed as quality metrics in head and neck cancer care. A recent single-institution study identified four key metrics associated with increased survival. This study sought to validate the association of these quality metrics with survival in a multi-institutional cohort. METHODS Multicenter retrospective study of patients with oral cavity squamous cell (1/2005-1/2015). Baseline patient and disease characteristics and compliance with quality metrics was evaluated. Association between compliance with quality metrics with overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Failure to comply with two or more of the quality metrics was associated with worse OS, DFS, and DSS. Adherence to all or all but one of the quality metrics was found to be associated with improved survival. CONCLUSIONS Process-related quality metrics are associated with increased survival in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in a multi-institutional cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara W Liu
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Neil M Woody
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Wei Wei
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Swathi Appachi
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jillian C Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ahmed I Ghanem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Brian Matia
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Nikhil P Joshi
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jamie A Ku
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Brian B Burkey
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Joseph Scharpf
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | | | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Neal E Dunlap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, KY, USA
| | | | - Sandro Porceddu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital/University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Howard Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Alexandra Hospital/University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Farzan Siddiqui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Nancy Y Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Shlomo Koyfman
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Eric D Lamarre
- Head and Neck Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kenigsberg AP, Meng X, Ghandour R, Margulis V. Oncologic outcomes of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:1841-1852. [PMID: 32944548 PMCID: PMC7475687 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy is the mainstay of surgical treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a disease which comprises approximately 5% of urothelial malignancies. Minimally-invasive and nephron-sparing interventions have been explored, although thus far have not shown comparable oncologic outcomes except in a relatively narrow set of patients. Due to the relative rarity of the disease, it has taken decades and multi-disciplinary efforts to sufficiently identify prognostic factors of oncologic outcomes. Despite these efforts, however, oncologic outcomes of nephroureterectomy have remained remarkably stable over the past 30 years. New techniques, such as laparoscopic and robotic surgery, have been applied to this procedure. High level evidence regarding equivalent oncologic outcomes is lacking and open surgery remains the standard of care for high-stage disease, although there is a role for laparoscopic and robotic nephroureterectomy. The importance of bladder cuff removal in improving oncologic outcomes has been broadly accepted, although there is no consensus as to the most oncologically appropriate technique. There does appear to be evidence that endoscopic techniques confer worse oncologic control. The role of lymphadenectomy remains controversial, although there is evidence that increased nodal yield could have oncologic benefit. Given disease heterogeneity and varied technical approaches to the procedure, no consensus standardized template has been identified. There is level 1 evidence for the use of intravesical chemotherapy peri-operatively and that this intervention can improve the risk of intravesical recurrence. Advances in systemic neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have yielded promising results and are likely to become standard of care for patients without contraindications. Immunotherapy and targeted biologic agents are also likely to improve the surgical efficacy of radical nephroureterectomy as well. Ultimately, more high level evidence is needed to identify successful surgical and medical approaches to UTUC and multi-institutional collaboration is critical to this progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2020 Update. Eur Urol 2020; 79:62-79. [PMID: 32593530 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.05.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 480] [Impact Index Per Article: 120.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The European Association of Urology (EAU) Guidelines Panel on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) has prepared updated guidelines to aid clinicians in the current evidence-based management of UTUC and to incorporate recommendations into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION The recommendations provided in the current guidelines are based on a thorough review of available UTUC guidelines and articles identified following a systematic search of Medline. Data on urothelial malignancies and UTUC were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, upper urinary tract carcinoma, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, and survival. References were weighted by a panel of experts. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Owing to the rarity of UTUC, there are insufficient data to provide strong recommendations. The 2017 tumour, node, metastasis (TNM) classification is recommended. Recommendations are given for diagnosis and risk stratification as well as for radical and conservative treatment, and prognostic factors are discussed. A single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin after nephroureterectomy reduces the risk of bladder tumour recurrence. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk tumour and two functional kidneys. After radical nephroureterectomy, cisplatin-based chemotherapy is indicated in locally advanced UTUC. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to a current standardised approach. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen, based on the proposed risk stratification of these tumours. PATIENT SUMMARY Urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, an appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.
Collapse
|
19
|
Survival Benefits Based on the Number of Lymph Nodes Removed during Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9061933. [PMID: 32575801 PMCID: PMC7357082 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9061933] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of lymph node dissection (LND) is still controversial for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and there are no guidelines regarding its use. This study was conducted to find a higher level of evidence for the survival benefits based on the number of LNs removed during radical nephroureterectomy (RNUx) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We included studies comparing patients who underwent LND during RNUx for UTUC. We searched the major electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase®, and Scopus®) and conducted manual searches of the electronically available abstracts of the major international urology cancer meetings [American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), American Urological Association (AUA), and Eropean Association of Urology (EAU)] prior to April 2019 using grouped terms of nephroureterectomy (nephroureterectom*) and lymph node excision (lymphadenectomy; lymph + node*; lymph* + metasta*) with variations in the terms. Study selection, data collection, and risk of bias assessment were performed by two independent authors (A and B). Six retrospective case-control studies included a total of 33,944 patients who underwent RNUx for UTUC, 5071 of whom underwent LND and were finally included in the meta-analysis. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) in these studies revealed that an increased number of LNs removed during RNUx was associated with improved cancer-specific survival (CSS) in patients with UTUC (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91–0.99; p = 0.07). In addition, increased numbers of LNs removed were associated with improved overall survival (OS) in pN0 patients. However, in pN+ patients, the number of LNs removed showed no survival benefit on CSS, overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS). Higher numbers of LNs removed during RNUx were associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with UTUC. This study confirmed that LND also has oncological benefits in UTUC patients. Although still a controversial topic, meticulous LND must be considered, and efforts should be made to eliminate as many LNs as possible when administering RNUx for UTUC, especially in patients without clear evidence of LN metastasis.
Collapse
|
20
|
Zhai TS, Jin L, Zhou Z, Liu X, Liu H, Chen W, Lu JY, Yao XD, Feng LM, Ye L. Effect of lymph node dissection on stage-specific survival in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with nephroureterectomy. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:1207. [PMID: 31830927 PMCID: PMC6907152 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6364-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We aimed to estimate the stage-specific impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on survival for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients treated with nephroureterectomy (NU). Methods Overall, 7278 UTUC patients undergoing NU within the SEER database from 2004 to 2015 were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots illustrated overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates according to LND status. Multivariable Cox regression analyses assessed the effect of LND on OS and CSS rates stratified by pathological tumor stage. Results LND was performed in 26.9% of patients, and in 18.6, 23.3, 31.2 and 45.9% for pT1, pT2, pT3 and pT4 patients, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analyses, LND was associated with a higher OS or CSS in UTUC patients with pT3 and pT4 disease (all P < 0.05), but failed to achieve independent predictor status in patients with pT1 and pT2 disease (all P > 0.05). LND with 1 to 3 regional lymph nodes removed was prone to a higher OS or CSS only in pT4 compared to no LND (both P < 0.01). LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed predisposed to a higher OS or CSS in pT3 or pT4 (all P < 0.05). Conclusions The beneficial effect of LND especially LND with 4 or more regional lymph nodes removed on survival was evident in pT3/4 patients. LND can be considered for pT3 and pT4, for pT1/2 remains to be seen, both of which will be verified by further prospective studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting-Shuai Zhai
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Liang Jin
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210000, China
| | - Xiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.,Department of Urology, Shanghai Putuo District People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200333, China
| | - Huan Liu
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China
| | - Jing-Yi Lu
- Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China
| | - Xu-Dong Yao
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China.
| | - Li-Ming Feng
- Department of Urology, Shawan People's Hospital, Shawan, Xinjiang, 832100, China.
| | - Lin Ye
- Department of Urology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital of Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, China. .,Department of Urology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, Xinjiang, 834000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Valuation of lymph node dissection in localized high-risk renal cell cancer using X-tile software. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 52:253-262. [PMID: 31612422 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02307-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/09/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Attempt to group the number of lymph nodes in a more ideal way to assess the value of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of localized high-risk renal cell cancer (LH-RCC). METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database (SEER) was used to analyze LH-RCC patients who undergoing radical nephrectomy (RN) from 2011 to 2015. The X-tile software was performed to calculate the optimal grouping cut-off points for the number of removed lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes. The Nomogram model was constructed by R language to visually present survival rates of patients. RESULTS Among 4917 cases of LH-RCC patients undergoing RN, there were 1835 patients treated with LND (37.32%) with the average survival time (AST) of 43.10 months (95% CI 41.91-44.29), which was superior than 40.52 months of patients who did not have LND (95% CI 39.26-41.78) (P < 0.01). The mortality risk of patients with ≥ 3 removed nodes was 0.75 times that of patients with 1-2 removed nodes (95% CI 0.62-0.99, P < 0.01). For overall survival (OS), the hazard ratio of ≥ 5 positive nodes, 1-4 positive nodes, and 0 positive node was 3.04, 2.37, and 1.00, respectively. The Nomogram model can evaluate the 1 year, 2 year, and 3 year survival rates of LH-RCC patients undergoing RN with the internal validation C-index of 0.73. CONCLUSION LH-RCC patients with ≥ 3 removed lymph nodes and fewer positive lymph nodes are expected to have better long-term survival. LND is not only helpful for tumor staging of LH-RCC, but also valuable for long-term survival.
Collapse
|
22
|
Grimes N, McKay A, Lee SM, Aboumarzouk OM. Lymph node dissection during nephroureterectomy: Establishing the existing evidence based on a review of the literature. Arab J Urol 2019; 17:167-180. [PMID: 31489232 PMCID: PMC6711077 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2019.1596401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2018] [Revised: 02/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Objective: To determine the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in the treatment of upper tract transitional cell carcinoma (UTTCC), as the role of LND along with nephroureterectomy in treating UTTCC is unclear and several retrospective studies have been published on this topic with conflicting results. Methods: The Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database (CENTRAL), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Clinicaltrials.gov, Google Scholar, and individual urological journals, were searched for all studies investigating the role of LND in the treatment of UTTCC. Of the studies identified, those that met inclusion criteria were included in this review. Results: In all, 27 studies were included in this review, with 9303 patients who underwent LND. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Tumours were located in the renal pelvis in 62% of patients, in the ureter in 35.5%, and multifocal in 2.3%. In total: 77.1% were LN-negative and 22.9% had LN metastasis. For all patients undergoing LND, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates were 27–65.4% and 32.3–95%, respectively. For patients who underwent a LND in accordance with a standardised anatomical template, the 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 84.3–93% and 83.5–94%, respectively. Conclusion: LND may provide a survival benefit in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy for UTTCC, particularly if following a standardised anatomical template and in those patients with muscle-invasive disease; however, a prospective RCT is required to confirm this. Abbreviations: CSS: cancer-specific survival; LN(D): lymph node (dissection); MeSH: Medical Subject Headings; OS: overall survival; pT: pathological T stage; RCT: randomised controlled trial; RFS: recurrence-free survival; UTTCC: upper tract TCC
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Grimes
- Department of Urology, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, UK
| | - Alastair McKay
- Department of Urology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK
| | - Su-Min Lee
- Department of Urology, Weston Area Health NHS Trust, Weston-super-Mare, UK
| | - Omar M Aboumarzouk
- Department of Urology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, UK.,University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nazzani S, Mazzone E, Preisser F, Tian Z, Mistretta FA, Shariat SF, Montanari E, Acquati P, Briganti A, Saad F, Carmignani L, Karakiewicz PI. Rates of lymph node invasion and their impact on cancer specific mortality in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45:1238-1245. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
24
|
Kim TH, Suh YS, Jeon HG, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY, Sung HH. Transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse disease progression than retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Sci Rep 2019; 9:6294. [PMID: 31000756 PMCID: PMC6472422 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-42739-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to compare the oncologic outcomes between retroperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy (rRNU) and transperitoneal radical nephroureterectomy (tRNU) for the treatment of patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Medical records of 743 eligible patients who underwent rRNU or tRNU between 1995 and 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the surgical approach using the Kaplan–Meier method. Predictors of PFS, CSS, and OS were analyzed with a multivariable Cox regression model. Overall, 620 (83.4%) and 123 (16.6%) patients were treated with rRNU and tRNU, respectively. Five-year CSS and OS rates were equivalent between rRNU and tRNU groups, but 5-year PFS was lower in the tRNU group than the rRNU group (P = 0.005). When patients were stratified by pathological T stage, PFS was significantly different between the two groups in favor of the rRNU group for both organ-confined disease (pTis/pTa/pT1/T2) (P = 0.022) and locally advanced disease (pT3/pT4) (P = 0.039). However, no significant differences in CSS or OS was observed when comparing the two surgical types in patients with organ-confined disease (P = 0.336 and P = 0.851) or patients with locally advanced disease (P = 0.499 and P = 0.278). tRNU was a significant predictor of PFS (hazard ratio = 1.54; P = 0.023), but not CSS or OS. Our findings indicate that the rRNU approach resulted in better PFS than the tRNU approach in patients with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Heon Kim
- Department of Urology, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon Seok Suh
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Han Yong Choi
- Department of Urology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma is a rare malignancy that has an abundance of surgical treatment options, including open, laparoscopic, robotic, and endoscopic approaches. As advances in technology allow for shorter, less morbid operations, the variation in care of this uncommon disease has raised concerns about compromising oncologic principles. Many institutions have described their experience with promising results; however, there is a paucity of high-quality data that supports the use of robotic surgery as a new gold standard. This article describes how to perform the operation using a single-dock method and reviews contemporary literature on perioperative and oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Taylor
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian, 525 East 68th Street, Star Pavilion, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Douglas S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian, 525 East 68th Street, Star Pavilion, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Danzig MR, Mallin K, McKiernan JM, Stadler WM, Sridhar SS, Morgan TM, Bochner BH, Lee CT. Prognostic importance of lymphovascular invasion in urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. Cancer 2018; 124:2507-2514. [PMID: 29624636 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2017] [Revised: 02/03/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess the impact of lymphovascular invasion on the survival of patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis. METHODS Patients with urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis who underwent radical nephroureterectomy from 2010 through 2015 were identified in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were characterized according to demographic and clinical factors, including pathologic tumor stage and lymphovascular invasion. Associations with overall survival were assessed through proportional hazards regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 4177 patients were identified; 1576 had lymphovascular invasion. Patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion had 5-year survival that was significantly worse than that of patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 52.6; P < .001 by the log-rank test), and approached that of patients with T4 disease without lymphovascular invasion (34.7% vs 26.5%; P = .002). On multivariate analysis controlling for age, comorbidities, grade, lymph node status, surgical margin status, race, sex, and chemotherapy administration, patients with T3 disease and lymphovascular invasion also were found to have significantly worse survival compared with patients with T3 disease without lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio, 1.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.91). CONCLUSIONS Lymphovascular invasion status is a key prognostic marker that can stratify the risk of patients with pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma further. Patients with this pathologic feature should be carefully considered for clinical trials exploring existing and novel therapies. Cancer 2018;124:2507-14. © 2018 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew R Danzig
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Katherine Mallin
- American College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | - Walter M Stadler
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Srikala S Sridhar
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Bernard H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Sathianathen NJ, Risk MC, Konety BR. Lymphadenectomy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer and Upper Tract Urothelial Cell Carcinoma. Urol Clin North Am 2018; 45:215-228. [PMID: 29650137 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
There are currently no reported randomized trials that characterize the staging or therapeutic benefit of performing a lymph node dissection in either bladder cancer or upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Several unanswered questions remain in this domain focused on the indications and patient selection for pelvic lymph node dissection, extent of dissection, its impact on outcome, and potential risks. However, the results of observational studies suggest that the burden of metastasis is high in both diseases when muscle invasive and performing a lymphadenectomy can provide prognostic information and yield therapeutic benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niranjan J Sathianathen
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Michael C Risk
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Badrinath R Konety
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota, Delaware Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Necchi A, Lo Vullo S, Mariani L, Moschini M, Hendricksen K, Rink M, Sosnowski R, Dobruch J, Raman JD, Wood CG, Margulis V, Roupret M, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Xylinas E, Shariat SF. Adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy does not improve survival in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a joint study by the European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists and the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. BJU Int 2017; 121:252-259. [PMID: 28940605 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyse the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy vs observation in a multicentre cohort of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in order to clarify whether such patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). PATIENTS AND METHODS Data from 15 centres were collected for a total of 1544 patients, treated between 2000 and 2015. Criteria for patient selection included pT2-4N0/x stage, or lymph node-positive disease, and prior RNU. The standardized difference approach was used to compare subgroup characteristics. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint. The primary analysis used 1:1 propensity score matching, with inverse probability of treatment weighting in addition to this in the secondary analysis. The latter was also performed with the inclusion of covariates, i.e. with 'doubly robust' estimation. A 6-month landmark analysis was performed to exclude early events. RESULTS A total of 312 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and 1232 underwent observation. Despite differences between the two groups, the standardized difference was generally <10% after matching. In the matched analysis no difference was observed in OS between adjuvant chemotherapy and observation (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence inverval [CI] 0.91-1.43; P = 0.268). In the doubly robust estimate-adjusted comparison, adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly associated with shorter OS (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02-1.54; P = 0.032). Similar findings were confirmed in subgroup analyses stratified by pathological stage, and after landmark analysis. Results should be interpreted with consideration given to the inherent limitations of retrospective studies. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve OS compared with observation in the present study. These results contribute to the uncertainties regarding postoperative chemotherapy in UTUC, and suggest dedicated prospective trials, new more potent therapies, and the identification of enhanced patient selection criteria are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Necchi
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Luigi Mariani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Michael Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Centre, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Roman Sosnowski
- Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, European Health Centre Otwock, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jakub Dobruch
- M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Morgan Roupret
- Academic Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpétrière Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Pierre et Marie Curie Medical School, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Cochin Hospital, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Inokuchi J, Kuroiwa K, Kakehi Y, Sugimoto M, Tanigawa T, Fujimoto H, Gotoh M, Masumori N, Ogawa O, Eto M, Ohyama C, Yamaguchi A, Matsuyama H, Ichikawa T, Asano T, Mizusawa J, Eba J, Naito S. Role of lymph node dissection during radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: multi-institutional large retrospective study JCOG1110A. World J Urol 2017; 35:1737-1744. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2049-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|