1
|
Sekihara K, Himuro H, Toda S, Saito N, Hirayama R, Suganuma N, Sasada T, Hoshino D. Recent Trends and Potential of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer. Biomedicines 2024; 12:1286. [PMID: 38927493 PMCID: PMC11201408 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12061286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2024] [Revised: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 06/07/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy characterized by advanced disease at diagnosis and a poor prognosis. Despite multimodal therapeutic approaches that include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, an optimal treatment strategy remains elusive. Current developments in targeted therapies and immunotherapy offer promising avenues for improved outcomes, particularly for BRAF-mutant patients. However, challenges remain regarding overcoming drug resistance and developing effective treatments for BRAF-wild-type tumors. This comprehensive review examines the clinical and biological features of ATC, outlines the current standards of care, and discusses recent developments with a focus on the evolving role of radiotherapy. Moreover, it emphasizes the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach and highlights the urgent need for further research to better understand ATC pathogenesis and identify new therapeutic targets. Collaborative efforts, including large-scale clinical trials, are essential for translating these findings into improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazumasa Sekihara
- Cancer Biology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (K.S.); (S.T.); (N.S.)
- Biospecimen Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 2418515, Japan
| | - Hidetomo Himuro
- Division of Cancer Immunotherapy, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (H.H.); (T.S.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 2418515, Japan
| | - Soji Toda
- Cancer Biology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (K.S.); (S.T.); (N.S.)
- Department of Breast and Thyroid Surgery, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama 2320024, Japan
| | - Nao Saito
- Cancer Biology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (K.S.); (S.T.); (N.S.)
- Biospecimen Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 2418515, Japan
| | - Ryoichi Hirayama
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba 2638555, Japan;
| | - Nobuyasu Suganuma
- Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 2360004, Japan;
| | - Tetsuro Sasada
- Division of Cancer Immunotherapy, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (H.H.); (T.S.)
| | - Daisuke Hoshino
- Cancer Biology Division, Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama 2418515, Japan; (K.S.); (S.T.); (N.S.)
- Biospecimen Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama 2418515, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Malouff TD, Newpower M, Bush A, Seneviratne D, Ebner DK. A Practical Primer on Particle Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00137-1. [PMID: 38844118 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Particle therapy is a promising treatment technique that is becoming more commonly used. Although proton beam therapy remains the most commonly used particle therapy, multiple other heavier ions have been used in the preclinical and clinical settings, each with its own unique properties. This practical review aims to summarize the differences between the studied particles, discussing their radiobiological and physical properties with additional review of the available clinical data. METHODS AND MATERIALS A search was carried out on the PubMed databases with search terms related to each particle. Relevant radiobiology, physics, and clinical studies were included. The articles were summarized to provide a practical resource for practicing clinicians. RESULTS A total of 113 articles and texts were included in our narrative review. Currently, proton beam therapy has the most data and is the most widely used, followed by carbon, helium, and neutrons. Although oxygen, neon, silicon, and argon have been used clinically, their future use will likely remain limited as monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS This review summarizes the properties of each of the clinically relevant particles. Protons, helium, and carbon will likely remain the most commonly used, although multi-ion therapy is an emerging technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy D Malouff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - Mark Newpower
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Aaron Bush
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Danushka Seneviratne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma, OU Health Stephenson Cancer Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Daniel K Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Koosha F, Ahmadikamalabadi M, Mohammadi M. Review of Recent Improvements in Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Glioblastoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101465. [PMID: 38770179 PMCID: PMC11103612 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This article provides an overview of the physical and biologic properties of carbon ions, followed by an examination of the latest clinical outcomes in patients with glioma who have received carbon ion radiation therapy. Methods and Materials According to thee articles that have been reviewed, glioma represents the predominant form of neoplastic growth in the brain, accounting for approximately 51% of all malignancies affecting the nervous system. Currently, high-grade glioma, specifically glioblastoma, comprises 15% of cases and is associated with a high mortality rate. The development of novel drugs for the treatment of high-grade tumors has been impeded by various factors, such as the blood-brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity, despite numerous endeavors. According to the definition of tumor grade established by the World Health Organization, the conventional treatment involves surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy. Despite numerous attempts in photon radiation therapy to apply the highest possible dose to the tumor site while minimizing damage to healthy tissue, there has been no success in increasing patient survival. The primary cause of resistance to conventional radiation therapy methods, namely x-ray and gamma-ray, is attributed to the survival of radio-resistant glioma stem cells, which have the potential to trigger a recurrence of tumors. Particle beams, such as protons and carbon ions, can deposit the highest dose to a confined region, thus offering a more accurate dose distribution compared with photon beams. Results Carbon ions exhibit higher linear energy transfer and relative biologic effectiveness compared with photons, potentially enabling them to overcome radio-resistant tumor cells. Conclusions Therefore, it can be hypothesized that carbon ion radiation therapy may show superior efficacy in destroying neoplastic cells with reduced negative outcomes compared with x-ray radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fereshteh Koosha
- Department of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdieh Ahmadikamalabadi
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
- Radiology Department, School of Paramedical Sciences, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
| | - Mohadesseh Mohammadi
- Department of Radiology Technology, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bryant JM, Mills MN, Yang GQ, Liveringhouse C, Palm R, Johnstone PA, Miller JT, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Naghavi AO. Novel Definitive Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-painting (HARD) for Unresected Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101447. [PMID: 38778821 PMCID: PMC11110037 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are historically radioresistant, with surgery being an integral component of their treatment. With their low α/β, STS may be more responsive to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT), which is often limited by long-term toxicity risk to surrounding normal tissue. An isotoxic approach using a hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) regimen allows for dosing based on clinical risk while sparing adjacent organs at risk. Methods and Materials We retrospectively identified patients from 2019 to 2022 with unresected STS who received HARD with dose-painting to high, intermediate, and low-risk regions of 3.0 Gy, 2.5 Gy, and 2.0 to 2.3 Gy, respectively, in 20 to 22 fractions. Clinical endpoints included local control, locoregional control, progression free survival, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Results Twenty-seven consecutive patients were identified and had a median age of 68 years and tumor size of 7.0 cm (range, 1.2-21.0 cm). Tumors were most often high-grade (70%), stage IV (70%), located in the extremities (59%), and locally recurrent (52%). With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, there was a 3-year locoregional control rate of 100%. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival were 44.9% and 23.3%, respectively. There were 5 (19%) acute and 2 (7%) late grade 3 toxicities, and there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities at any point. Conclusions The HARD regimen is a safe method of dose-escalating STS, with durable 3-year locoregional control. This approach is a promising alternative for unresected STS, though further follow-up is required to determine long-term control and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - George Q. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Russell Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A. Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Justin T. Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O. Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakamura M, Mizumoto M, Saito T, Shimizu S, Li Y, Oshiro Y, Inaba M, Hosaka S, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Iizumi T, Nakai K, Maruo K, Sakurai H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy and particle beam therapy for skull base chondrosarcoma: TRP-chondrosarcoma 2024. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1380716. [PMID: 38567162 PMCID: PMC10985235 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1380716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Chondrosarcoma is a rare malignant bone tumor. Particle beam therapy (PT) can concentrate doses to targets while reducing adverse events. A meta-analysis based on a literature review was performed to examine the efficacy of PT and photon radiotherapy for skull base chondrosarcoma. Methods The meta-analysis was conducted using 21 articles published from 1990 to 2022. Results After PT, the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.0-96.2%) and 93.9% (95% CI: 90.6-96.1%), respectively, and the 3- and 5-year local control rates were 95.4% (95% CI: 92.0-97.4%) and 90.1% (95% CI: 76.8-96.0%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis revealed a significant association of PT with a superior 5-year OS rate compared to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (p < 0.001). In the studies used in the meta-analysis, the major adverse event of grade 2 or higher was temporal lobe necrosis (incidence 1-18%, median 7%). Conclusion PT for skull base chondrosarcoma had a good outcome and may be a valuable option among radiotherapy modalities. However, high-dose postoperative irradiation of skull base chondrosarcoma can cause adverse events such as temporal lobe necrosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Masashi Mizumoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Shosei Shimizu
- Department of Pediatric Radiation Therapy Center/Pediatric Proton Beam Therapy Center, Hebei Yizhou Cancer Hospital, Zhuozhou, China
| | - Yinuo Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Yoshiko Oshiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Masako Inaba
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Sho Hosaka
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Takashi Iizumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kei Nakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Kazushi Maruo
- Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kotecha R, La Rosa A, Mehta MP. How proton therapy fits into the management of adult intracranial tumors. Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S26-S45. [PMID: 38437667 PMCID: PMC10911801 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracranial tumors include a challenging array of primary and secondary parenchymal and extra-axial tumors which cause neurologic morbidity consequential to location, disease extent, and proximity to critical neurologic structures. Radiotherapy can be used in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting either with curative or palliative intent. Proton therapy (PT) is a promising advance due to dosimetric advantages compared to conventional photon radiotherapy with regards to normal tissue sparing, as well as distinct physical properties, which yield radiobiologic benefits. In this review, the principles of efficacy and safety of PT for a variety of intracranial tumors are discussed, drawing upon case series, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, and randomized clinical trials. This manuscript explores the potential advantages of PT, including reduced acute and late treatment-related side effects and improved quality of life. The objective is to provide a comprehensive review of the current evidence and clinical outcomes of PT. Given the lack of consensus and directives for its utilization in patients with intracranial tumors, we aim to provide a guide for its judicious use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Translational Medicine, Hebert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Alonso La Rosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Minesh P Mehta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ravindran PK, Keizer ME, Kunst HDPM, Compter I, Van Aalst J, Eekers DBP, Temel Y. Skull-Base Chondrosarcoma: A Systematic Review of the Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:856. [PMID: 38473218 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Surgery and radiotherapy are key elements to the treatment of skull-base chondrosarcomas; however, there is currently no consensus regarding whether or not adjuvant radiotherapy has to be administered. This study searched the EMBASE, Cochrane, and PubMed databases for clinical studies evaluating the long-term prognosis of surgery with or without adjuvant radiotherapy. After reviewing the search results, a total of 22 articles were selected for this review. A total of 1388 patients were included in this cohort, of which 186 received surgery only. With mean follow-up periods ranging from 39.1 to 86 months, surgical treatment provided progression-free survival (PFS) rates ranging from 83.7 to 92.9% at 3 years, 60.0 to 92.9% at 5 years, and 58.2 to 64.0% at 10 years. Postoperative radiotherapy provides PFS rates ranging between 87 and 96.2% at 3 years, 57.1 and 100% at 5 years, and 67 and 100% at 10 years. Recurrence rates varied from 5.3% to 39.0% in the surgery-only approach and between 1.5% and 42.90% for the postoperative radiotherapy group. When considering prognostic variables, higher age, brainstem/optic apparatus compression, and larger tumor volume prior to radiotherapy were found to be significant factors for local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pawan Kishore Ravindran
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Max E Keizer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Henricus Dirk P M Kunst
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Compter
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper Van Aalst
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 ET Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasin Temel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Dutch Academic Alliance Skull Base Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Radboud University Medical Center, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mattke M, Ohlinger M, Bougatf N, Wolf R, Welzel T, Roeder F, Gerum S, Fussl C, Annon-Eberharter N, Ellerbrock M, Jäkel O, Haberer T, Herfarth K, Uhl M, Debus J, Seidensaal K, Harrabi S. Patterns of Temporal Lobe Reaction and Radiation Necrosis after Particle Radiotherapy in Patients with Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma-A Single-Center Experience. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:718. [PMID: 38398109 PMCID: PMC10886807 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study aims to evaluate the occurrence of temporal lobe reactions and identify possible risk factors for patients who underwent particle therapy of the skull base. METHODS 244 patients treated for skull base chordoma (n = 144) or chondrosarcoma (n = 100) at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) using a raster scan technique, were analyzed. Follow-up MRI-scans were matched with the initial planning images. Radiogenic reactions were contoured and analyzed based on volume and dose of treatment. RESULTS 51 patients with chordoma (35.4%) and 30 patients (30%) with chondrosarcoma experienced at least one temporal lobe reaction within the follow-up period (median 49 months for chondrosarcoma, 62 months for chordoma). Age, irradiated volume, and dose values were significant risk factors for the development of temporal lobe reactions with the highest significance for the value of DMax-7 being defined as the dose maximum in the temporal lobe minus the 7cc with the highest dose (p = 0.000000000019; OR 1.087). CONCLUSION Temporal lobe reactions are a common side effect after particle therapy of the skull base. We were able to develop a multivariate model, which predicted radiation reactions with a specificity of 99% and a sensitivity of 52.2%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landesklinikum (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.R.); (S.G.); (C.F.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| | - Matteo Ohlinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| | - Nina Bougatf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robert Wolf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| | - Thomas Welzel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landesklinikum (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.R.); (S.G.); (C.F.)
- Institute of Research and Development of Advanced Radiation Technologies (radART), Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landesklinikum (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.R.); (S.G.); (C.F.)
| | - Christoph Fussl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landesklinikum (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.R.); (S.G.); (C.F.)
| | - Natalee Annon-Eberharter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburger Landesklinikum (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (F.R.); (S.G.); (C.F.)
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division for Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwigshafen Hospital, 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany;
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany (N.B.); (R.W.); (T.W.); (O.J.); (K.H.); (J.D.); (S.H.)
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.E.); (T.H.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Jang JY, Kim K, Chen M, Akimoto T, Wang MLC, Kim M, Kim K, Lee TH, Yoo GS, Park HC. A meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety between proton beam therapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7023. [PMID: 38396380 PMCID: PMC10891363 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing clinical evidence. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PBT and CIRT. The included studies were required to report oncological outcomes (local control [LC], progression-free survival [PFS], or overall survival [OS]) or adverse events. RESULTS Eighteen articles comprising 1857 patients (947 treated with PBT and 910 treated with CIRT) were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis conducted for the overall population yielded average hazard ratios of 0.690 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.493-0.967, p = 0.031) for LC, 0.952 (95% CI, 0.604-1.500, p = 0.590) for PFS, and 1.183 (0.872-1.607, p = 0.281) for OS with reference to CIRT. The subgroup analyses included patients treated in the head and neck, areas other than the head and neck, and patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas. These analyses revealed no significant differences in most outcomes, except for LC in the subgroup of patients treated in areas other than the head and neck. Adverse event rates were comparable in both groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.097 (95% CI, 0.744-1.616, p = 0.641). Meta-regression analysis for possible heterogeneity did not demonstrate a significant association between treatment outcomes and the ratio of biologically effective doses between modalities. CONCLUSION This study highlighted the comparability of PBT and CIRT in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Yun Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Miao‐Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle TherapyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
| | | | - Min‐Ji Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Radiation OncologyChungbuk National University HospitalCheongjuRepublic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Endo M. Creation, evolution, and future challenges of ion beam therapy from a medical physicist's viewpoint (Part 3): Chapter 3. Clinical research, Chapter 4. Future challenges, Chapter 5. Discussion, and Conclusion. Radiol Phys Technol 2023; 16:443-470. [PMID: 37882992 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-023-00748-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Clinical studies of ion beam therapy have been performed at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung (GSI), and Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), in addition to the development of equipment, biophysical models, and treatment planning systems. Although cancers, including brain tumors and pancreatic cancer, have been treated with the Bevalac's neon-ion beam at the LBL (where the first clinical research was conducted), insufficient results were obtained owing to the limited availability of neon-ion beams and immaturity of related technologies. However, the 184-Inch Cyclotron's helium-ion beam yielded promising results for chordomas and chondrosarcomas at the base of the skull. Using carbon-ion beams, NIRS has conducted clinical trials for the treatment of common cancers for which radiotherapy is indicated. Because better results than X-ray therapy results have been obtained for lung, liver, pancreas, and prostate cancers, as well as pelvic recurrences of rectal cancer, the Japanese government recently approved the use of public medical insurance for carbon-ion radiotherapy, except for lung cancer. GSI obtained better results than LBL for bone and soft tissue tumors, owing to dose enhancement enabled by scanning irradiation. In addition, DKFZ compared treatment results of proton and carbon-ion radiotherapy for these tumors. This article summarizes a series of articles (Parts 1-3) and describes future issues of immune ion beam therapy and linear energy transfer optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Endo
- Association for Nuclear Technology in Medicine, Nikkei Bldg., 7-16 Nihombashi-Kodemmacho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 103-0001, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Holtzman AL, Seidensaal K, Iannalfi A, Kim KH, Koto M, Yang WC, Shiau CY, Mahajan A, Ahmed SK, Trifiletti DM, Peterson JL, Koffler DM, Vallow LA, Hoppe BS, Rutenberg MS. Carbon Ion Radiotherapy: An Evidence-Based Review and Summary Recommendations of Clinical Outcomes for Skull-Base Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5021. [PMID: 37894388 PMCID: PMC10605639 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma are rare radioresistant tumors treated with surgical resection and/or radiotherapy. Because of the established dosimetric and biological benefits of heavy particle therapy, we performed a systematic and evidence-based review of the clinical outcomes of patients with skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma treated with carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). A literature review was performed using a MEDLINE search of all articles to date. We identified 227 studies as appropriate for review, and 24 were ultimately included. The published data illustrate that CIRT provides benchmark disease control outcomes for skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma, respectively, with acceptable toxicity. CIRT is an advanced treatment technique that may provide not only dosimetric benefits over conventional photon therapy but also biologic intensification to overcome mechanisms of radioresistance. Ongoing research is needed to define the magnitude of benefit, patient selection, and cost-effectiveness of CIRT compared to other forms of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L. Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Kyung Hwan Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei Cancer Center, Heavy Ion Therapy Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul 03722, Republic of Korea
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Wan-Chin Yang
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Ying Shiau
- Department of Heavy Particles & Radiation Oncology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei City 11217, Taiwan
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Safia K. Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ 85259, USA
| | | | | | - Daniel M. Koffler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Laura A. Vallow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | - Bradford S. Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kobayashi K, Hanai N, Yoshimoto S, Saito Y, Homma A. Current topics and management of head and neck sarcomas. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:743-756. [PMID: 37309253 PMCID: PMC10533342 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Given the low incidence, variety of histological types, and heterogeneous biological features of head and neck sarcomas, there is limited high-quality evidence available to head and neck oncologists. For resectable sarcomas, surgical resection followed by radiotherapy is the principle of local treatment, and perioperative chemotherapy is considered for chemotherapy-sensitive sarcomas. They often originate in anatomical border areas such as the skull base and mediastinum, and they require a multidisciplinary treatment approach considering functional and cosmetic impairment. Moreover, head and neck sarcomas may exhibit different behaviour and characteristics than sarcomas of other areas. In recent years, the molecular biological features of sarcomas have been used for the pathological diagnosis and development of novel agents. This review describes the historical background and recent topics that head and neck oncologists should know about this rare tumour from the following five perspectives: (i) epidemiology and general characteristics of head and neck sarcomas; (ii) changes in histopathological diagnosis in the genomic era; (iii) current standard treatment by histological type and clinical questions specific to head and neck; (iv) new drugs for advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas; and (v) proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for head and neck sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenya Kobayashi
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Nobuhiro Hanai
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya
| | - Seiichi Yoshimoto
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
| | - Yuki Saito
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Tokyo, Tokyo
| | - Akihiro Homma
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iannalfi A, Riva G, Ciccone L, Orlandi E. The role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1161752. [PMID: 37350949 PMCID: PMC10283010 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1161752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
The skull base is an anatomically and functionally critical area surrounded by vital structures such as the brainstem, the spinal cord, blood vessels, and cranial nerves. Due to this complexity, management of skull base tumors requires a multidisciplinary approach involving a team of specialists such as neurosurgeons, otorhinolaryngologists, radiation oncologists, endocrinologists, and medical oncologists. In the case of pediatric patients, cancer management should be performed by a team of pediatric-trained specialists. Radiation therapy may be used alone or in combination with surgery to treat skull base tumors. There are two main types of radiation therapy: photon therapy and particle therapy. Particle radiotherapy uses charged particles (protons or carbon ions) that, due to their peculiar physical properties, permit precise targeting of the tumor with minimal healthy tissue exposure. These characteristics allow for minimizing the potential long-term effects of radiation exposure in terms of neurocognitive impairments, preserving quality of life, and reducing the risk of radio-induced cancer. For these reasons, in children, adolescents, and young adults, proton therapy should be an elective option when available. In radioresistant tumors such as chordomas and sarcomas and previously irradiated recurrent tumors, particle therapy permits the delivery of high biologically effective doses with low, or however acceptable, toxicity. Carbon ion therapy has peculiar and favorable radiobiological characteristics to overcome radioresistance features. In low-grade tumors, proton therapy should be considered in challenging cases due to tumor volume and involvement of critical neural structures. However, particle radiotherapy is still relatively new, and more research is needed to fully understand its effects. Additionally, the availability of particle therapy is limited as it requires specialized equipment and expertise. The purpose of this manuscript is to review the available literature regarding the role of particle radiotherapy in the treatment of skull base tumors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rutenberg MS, Beltran C. Future Perspective: Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Head and Neck and Skull Base Malignancies. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2023:S1042-3699(23)00024-9. [PMID: 37117091 DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2023.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Head and neck and base of skull malignancies are challenging for surgical and radiotherapy treatment due to the density of sensitive tissues. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a form of heavy particle therapy that uses accelerated carbon ions to treat malignancies that may be radioresistant or in challenging anatomic locations. CIRT has an increased biological effectiveness (ie, increased cell killing) at the end of the range of the carbon beam (ie, within the target tissue) but not in the entrance dose. This increased biological effectiveness can overcome the effects of radioresistant tumors, tissue hypoxia, and the need for radiotherapy fractionation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
| | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gilbert A, Tudor M, Montanari J, Commenchail K, Savu DI, Lesueur P, Chevalier F. Chondrosarcoma Resistance to Radiation Therapy: Origins and Potential Therapeutic Solutions. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15071962. [PMID: 37046623 PMCID: PMC10093143 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15071962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Chondrosarcoma is a malignant cartilaginous tumor that is particularly chemoresistant and radioresistant to X-rays. The first line of treatment is surgery, though this is almost impossible in some specific locations. Such resistances can be explained by the particular composition of the tumor, which develops within a dense cartilaginous matrix, producing a resistant area where the oxygen tension is very low. This microenvironment forces the cells to adapt and dedifferentiate into cancer stem cells, which are described to be more resistant to conventional treatments. One of the main avenues considered to treat this type of tumor is hadrontherapy, in particular for its ballistic properties but also its greater biological effectiveness against tumor cells. In this review, we describe the different forms of chondrosarcoma resistance and how hadrontherapy, combined with other treatments involving targeted inhibitors, could help to better treat high-grade chondrosarcoma.
Collapse
|
16
|
Arians N, Lindel K, Krisam J, Oelmann-Avendano JT, Meixner E, König L, Hoerner-Rieber J, Wark A, Forster T, Weykamp F, Lang K, Schneeweiss A, Ellerbrock M, Mielke T, Herfarth K, Debus J. Treatment Tolerability and Toxicity of Postoperative Proton Beam Therapy for Gynecologic Malignancies: Results of the Prospective Phase 2 APROVE-trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023:S0360-3016(23)00012-3. [PMID: 36642110 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The APROVE study is a prospective one-arm phase-2 study investigating the safety and treatment tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with uterine cervical or endometrial cancer. In this analysis, we report the primary study endpoint of safety and treatment tolerability as well as toxicity rates and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS AND MATERIALS 25 patients were treated with postoperative proton beam therapy with a total dose of 45 to 50.4 Gy (RBE) in 5 to 6 × 1.8 Gy (RBE) fractions weekly using active raster-scanning intensity modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Sequential or simultaneous platinum-based chemotherapy was administered if indicated. The primary endpoint was defined as the lack of any acute ≥grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) or urogenital (GU) toxicity according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0 or premature treatment abortion. Secondary endpoints were clinical symptoms and toxicity, quality of life, and PFS. RESULTS All patients completed IMPT according to the protocol, with a median treatment duration of 43 days (range, 33 to 51 days). No patient developed gastrointestinal or genitourinary toxicity ≥grade 3, and the treatment tolerability rate was 100%. Therefore, the null hypothesis H0: Tolerability Rate ≤80% could be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis H1: Tolerability rate >80% using an exact binomial test with a one-sided significance level of α = 10% (one-sided P value P = .0059). The median follow-up time after the end of IMPT was 25.1 months (range, 20.2 to 50.3 months). 18 of 25 (75%) patients completed the study follow-up of 24 months. 7 patients had progressive disease. Kaplan-Meier-estimated mean PFS was 39.9 months (95% confidence interval: 33.37 to 46.5 months). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative IMPT is a safe treatment option for cervical and endometrial cancer patients, with only low-grade acute and late toxicities. Larger randomized trials are necessary to further assess the potential of IMPT and improve patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie Arians
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Katja Lindel
- Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe, Department of Radiation Oncology, Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Johannes Krisam
- Institute for Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Eva Meixner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hoerner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antje Wark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Forster
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Fabian Weykamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Malte Ellerbrock
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Mielke
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Health-related quality of life and patient-reported symptoms after postoperative proton beam radiotherapy of cervical and endometrial cancer: 2-year results of the prospective phase II APROVE-trial. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:5. [PMID: 36624483 PMCID: PMC9827629 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02198-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The APROVE-trial investigated the tolerability of postoperative proton beam therapy in women with cervical or endometrial cancer. The present analysis evaluated the secondary endpoints of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and patient-reported symptoms. METHODS 25 patients were included in this prospective phase-II-trial and treated with postoperative radiotherapy using protons alone or in combination with chemotherapy. To attain general and gynecologic-specific HRQOL measures, the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires combined with -QLQ-CX24 for cervical and -QLQ-EN24 for endometrial cancer were assessed at baseline, at the end of RT and up to 2 years after radiotherapy. The results were compared to an age-matched norm reference population. Symptoms were assessed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and institutional patient-reported symptoms grading. RESULTS Scores regarding global health status were markedly impaired at baseline (mean: 58.0 ± 20.1) compared to reference population data, but significantly (p = 0.036) improved and evened out to comparable norm values 2 years after proton therapy (mean: 69.9 ± 19.3). Treatment caused acute and long-term worsening of pain (p = 0.048) and gastrointestinal symptoms (p = 0.016) for women with endometrial cancer, but no higher-grade CTCAE ≥ 3° toxicity was observed. Dosimetric evaluation of rectum, sigmoid, large and small bowel showed no correlation with the reported gastrointestinal symptoms. After 2 years, fatigue had significantly improved (p = 0.030), whereas patients with cervical cancer experienced more often lymphedema (p = 0.017). Scores for endometrial cancer pertaining to sexual activity (p = 0.048) and body image (p = 0.022) had improved post treatment; in the latter this effect persisted after 2 years. CONCLUSION Proton beam therapy in the adjuvant setting was well tolerated with only low-grade side effects concerning gastrointestinal symptoms, lymphedema and pain. Overall quality of life was impaired at baseline, but patients were able to recover to values comparable to norm population 2 years after proton therapy. Larger studies are needed to confirm whether the benefit of proton therapy translates into a clinical effect. Sexual dysfunction remains an important issue. TRIAL REGISTRATION The trial was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03184350, 09th June 2017).
Collapse
|
18
|
Dong M, Liu R, Zhang Q, Luo H, Wang D, Wang Y, Chen J, Ou Y, Wang X. Efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:172. [PMID: 36284346 PMCID: PMC9594886 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This study aimed to systematically evaluate and conduct a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of carbon ion radiotherapy for bone sarcomas. Methods We searched for articles using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases from their inception to January 12, 2022. Two researchers independently screened the literature and extracted data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA version 14.0. Results We searched for 4378 candidate articles, of which 12 studies were included in our study according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of the 897 BSs patients who received carbon ion radiotherapy in the studies, 526 patients had chordoma, 255 patients had chondrosarcoma, 112 patients had osteosarcoma, and 4 patients had other sarcomas. The local control rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 98.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.961–1.009, I2 = 0%), 85.8% (95% CI = 0.687–1.030, I2 = 91%), 86% (95% CI = 0.763–0.957, I2 = 85.3%), 91.1% (95% CI = 0.849–0.974), 74.3% (95% CI = 0.666–0.820, I2 = 85.2%), and 64.7% (95% CI = 0.451–0.843, I2 = 95.3%), respectively. The overall survival rate at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 years in these studies were 99.9% (95% CI = 0.995–1.004, I2 = 0%), 89.6% (95% CI = 0.811–0.980, I2 = 96.6%), 85% (95% CI = 0.750–0.950, I2 = 89.4%), 92.4% (95% CI = 0.866–0.982), 72.7% (95% CI = 0.609–0.844, I2 = 95.3%), and 72.1% (95% CI = 0.661–0.781, I2 = 46.5%), respectively. Across all studies, the incidence of acute and late toxicities was mainly grade 1 to grade 2, and grade 1 to grade 3, respectively. Conclusion As an advanced radiotherapy, carbon ion radiotherapy is promising for patients with bone sarcomas that are unresectable or residual after incomplete surgery. The data indicated that carbon ion radiotherapy was safe and effective for bone sarcomas, showing promising results for local control, overall survival, and lower acute and late toxicity. PROSPERO registration number CRD42021258480. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-02089-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Dong
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| | - Hongtao Luo
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China
| | - Dandan Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhang Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Junru Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, No.1, Donggang West Road, Lanzhou, 730000, People's Republic of China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Durante M, Debus J, Loeffler JS. Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions. NATURE REVIEWS. PHYSICS 2021; 3:777-790. [PMID: 34870097 PMCID: PMC7612063 DOI: 10.1038/s42254-021-00368-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy should have low toxicity in the entrance channel (normal tissue) and be very effective in cell killing in the target region (tumour). In this regard, ions heavier than protons have both physical and radiobiological advantages over conventional X-rays. Carbon ions represent an excellent combination of physical and biological advantages. There are a dozen carbon-ion clinical centres in Europe and Asia, and more under construction or at the planning stage, including the first in the USA. Clinical results from Japan and Germany are promising, but a heated debate on the cost-effectiveness is ongoing in the clinical community, owing to the larger footprint and greater expense of heavy ion facilities compared with proton therapy centres. We review here the physical basis and the clinical data with carbon ions and the use of different ions, such as helium and oxygen. Research towards smaller and cheaper machines with more effective beam delivery is necessary to make particle therapy affordable. The potential of heavy ions has not been fully exploited in clinics and, rather than there being a single 'silver bullet', different particles and their combination can provide a breakthrough in radiotherapy treatments in specific cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
- Institute of Condensed Matter Physics, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jay S. Loeffler
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Merna C, Lehrich BM, Kshirsagar RS, Eide JG, Diaz-Aguilar LD, Goshtasbi K, Yasaka TM, Sahyouni R, Palmer JN, Adappa ND, Hsu FPK, Kuan EC. Determinants of Survival in Skull Base Chondrosarcoma: A National Cancer Database Study. World Neurosurg 2021; 158:e766-e777. [PMID: 34808412 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.11.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Chondrosarcomas of the skull base are rare tumors most commonly treated surgically with or without adjuvant radiation therapy. Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), we analyzed overall survival (OS), treatment modalities, and prognosticators. METHODS The NCDB was queried for all cases of histologically confirmed skull base chondrosarcoma treated between 2004 and 2015, excluding patients with more than 1 malignant tumor, on palliative care, receiving unrelated concurrent treatments, or having less than 1 month of follow-up. The χ2 test for categorical variables, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier log-rank analysis were used to test associations with the use of adjuvant radiation, OS, and survival time. RESULTS A total of 498 patients with skull base chondrosarcoma were identified in the NCDB. Of them, 224 (45.0%) and 198 (39.8%) were treated with either surgery alone or surgery with adjuvant radiation therapy, respectively. Patients more likely to undergo surgery with adjuvant radiation had higher tumor grade (P = 0.008), later year of diagnosis (P = 0.002), positive surgical margins (P < 0.001), and treatment at an academic institution (P = 0.02). Patient, tumor, and socioeconomic factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included the Charlson/Deyo Comorbidity Score ≥2 (P = 0.017), as well as clear cell (P = 0.02) and dedifferentiated (P = 0.006) histology. Age, tumor grade, tumor size, treatment modality, insurance status, facility type, and urban/rural population did not show a statistically significant impact on OS. CONCLUSION The mainstay of treatment for skull base chondrosarcoma is surgery, with consideration of adjuvant radiation. This study demonstrated worse overall survival associated with more frail patients and aggressive histology types. It is important to consider these factors when planning the clinical management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Merna
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Brandon M Lehrich
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Rijul S Kshirsagar
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jacob G Eide
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luis Daniel Diaz-Aguilar
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Khodayar Goshtasbi
- School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Tyler M Yasaka
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Ronald Sahyouni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - James N Palmer
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nithin D Adappa
- Division of Rhinology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Frank P K Hsu
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA
| | - Edward C Kuan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Eichkorn T, König L, Held T, Naumann P, Harrabi S, Ellerbrock M, Herfarth K, Haberer T, Debus J. Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy: One Decade of Research and Clinical Experience at Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:597-609. [PMID: 34560023 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja Eichkorn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit, Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Particle Radiotherapy for Skull Base Chondrosarcoma: A Clinical Series from Italian National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13174423. [PMID: 34503233 PMCID: PMC8430859 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13174423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Skull-base chondrosarcoma is a rare locally aggressive or malignant group of cartilaginous neoplasm. The standard of care consists of surgery and high-dose radiation therapy, better if with particle, due to their radioresistance and proximity to organs at risk such as brainstem and optic pathways. Due to the rarity of the tumor and its site, outcomes in terms of local control and toxicity of patients with this malignancy after receiving particle therapy has been documented only in a limited number of series with a restricted number of patients, in particular with regard to carbon ions. The aim of our retrospective study is to assess the role of particle therapy (protons and carbon ions) after surgery in our Institute in skull-base chondrosarcomas. Abstract Background: The standard treatment for skull base chondrosarcoma (SB-CHS) consists of surgery and high-dose radiation therapy. Our aim was to evaluate outcome in terms of local control (LC) and toxicity of proton therapy (PT) and carbon ion (CIRT) after surgery. Materials and methods: From September 2011 to July 2020, 48 patients underwent particle therapy (67% PT, 33% CIRT) for SB-CHS. PT and CIRT total dose was 70 GyRBE (relative biological effectiveness) in 35 fractions and 70.4 GyRBE in 16 fractions, respectively. Toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v5). Results: After a median follow-up time of 38 months, one local failure (2%) was documented and the patient died for progressive disease. Overall, 3-year LC was 98%. One (2%) and 4 (8%) patients experienced G3 acute and late toxicity, respectively. White-matter brain changes were documented in 22 (46%) patients, but only 7 needed steroids (G2). No patients had G3 brain toxicity. No G4–5 complications were reported. We did not find any correlation between high-grade toxicity or white-matter changes and characteristics of patients, disease and surgery. Conclusions: PT and CIRT appeared to be effective and safe treatments for patients with SB-CHS, resulting in high LC rates and an acceptable toxicity profile.
Collapse
|
23
|
Wang X, Chen X, Li G, Han X, Gao T, Liu W, Tang X. Application of Carbon Ion and Its Sensitizing Agent in Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review. Front Oncol 2021; 11:708724. [PMID: 34290989 PMCID: PMC8287631 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.708724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT) is the most advanced radiation therapy (RT) available and offers new opportunities to improve cancer treatment and research. CIRT has a unique physical and biological advantage that allow them to kill tumor cells more accurately and intensively. So far, CIRT has been used in almost all types of malignant tumors, and showed good feasibility, safety and acceptable toxicity, indicating that CIRT has a wide range of development and application prospects. In addition, in order to improve the biological effect of CIRT, scientists are also trying to investigate related sensitizing agents to enhance the killing ability of tumor cells, which has attracted extensive attention. In this review, we tried to systematically review the rationale, advantages and problems, the clinical applications and the sensitizing agents of the CIRT. At the same time, the prospects of the CIRT in were prospected. We hope that this review will help researchers interested in CIRT, sensitizing agents, and radiotherapy to understand their magic more systematically and faster, and provide data reference and support for bioanalysis, clinical medicine, radiotherapy, heavy ion therapy, and nanoparticle diagnostics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaolin Wang
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaojun Chen
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Guangfei Li
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Han
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Tianxin Gao
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Weifeng Liu
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoying Tang
- School of Life Science, Institute of Engineering Medicine, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hasegawa H, Vakharia K, Graffeo CS, Carlson ML, Pollock BE, Brown PD, Perry A, Van Gompel JJ, Driscoll CLW, Link MJ. Long-term outcomes of grade I/II skull base chondrosarcoma: an insight into the role of surgery and upfront radiotherapy. J Neurooncol 2021; 153:273-281. [PMID: 33907967 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-021-03764-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To clarify the need for post-operative radiation treatment in skull base chondrosarcomas (SBCs). METHODS A retrospective analysis of patients with grade I or II SBC. Patients were divided according to post-surgical treatment strategies: (A) planned upfront radiotherapy and (B) watchful waiting. Tumor control and survival were compared between the treatment groups. The median follow-up after resection was 105 months (range, 9-376). RESULTS Thirty-two patients (Grade 1, n = 16; Grade 2, n = 16) were included. The most frequent location was petroclival (21, 64%). A gross total resection (GTR) was achieved in 11 patients (34%). Fourteen (44%) underwent upfront radiotherapy (group A) whereas 18 (56%) were followed with serial MRI alone (group B). The tumor control rate for the entire group was 77% and 69% at 10- and 15-year, respectively. Upfront radiotherapy (P = 0.25), extent of resection (P = 0.11) or tumor grade (P = 0.83) did not affect tumor control. The majority of Group B patients with recurrent tumors (5/7) obtained tumor control with repeat resection (n = 2), salvage radiotherapy (n = 2), or a combination of both (n = 1). The 10-year disease-specific survival was 95% with no difference between the group A and B (P = 0.50). CONCLUSION For patients with grade I/II SBC, a reasonable strategy is deferral of radiotherapy after maximum safe resection until tumor progression or recurrence. At that time, most patients can be successfully managed with salvage radiotherapy or surgery. Late recurrences may occur, and life-long follow-up is advisable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotaka Hasegawa
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kunal Vakharia
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Bruce E Pollock
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Paul D Brown
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Avital Perry
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | - Michael J Link
- Departments of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Venteicher AS, McDowell MM, Goldschmidt E, Wang EW, Snyderman CH, Gardner PA. A preoperative risk classifier that predicts tumor progression in patients with cranial base chondrosarcomas. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:457-465. [PMID: 31923886 DOI: 10.3171/2019.10.jns191672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors conducted a study to identify clinical features of cranial base chondrosarcomas that will predict tumor progression after resection. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study at a tertiary referral cranial base center. Patients who underwent resection of cranial base chondrosarcomas between January 2004 and December 2018 were followed longitudinally. The main outcome measure was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 41 patients were treated for histopathologically proven "conventional" cranial base chondrosarcomas during the study period, and the median PFS was 123 months for the cohort. Univariate analysis was performed on clinical, anatomical, and radiographic parameters collected for each patient. Features that were statistically significant were fed into a multivariate regression model, which revealed two independent predictors of PFS: patient age and encasement of 3-4 major arteries (> 25% of the vessel wall surrounded by tumor). Using these two variables of age and multiple arterial vessel encasement, the authors generated a risk stratification model using a simple point system to predict PFS in patients with cranial base chondrosarcomas. Based on these two factors known preoperatively, this model could stratify patients into high-risk (10% of patients), intermediate-risk (68% of patients), and low-risk (22% of patients) subgroups corresponding to dramatically distinct median PFS (1.8 years, 10.2 years, and no progression, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In patients with cranial base chondrosarcomas, age and artery encasement are variables known preoperatively that can powerfully predict tumor progression, define operative goals, and aid in selecting postoperative adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew S Venteicher
- Departments of1Neurological Surgery and
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Eric W Wang
- 2Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | - Carl H Snyderman
- 2Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yang J, Hu W, Guan X, Hu J, Gao J, Qiu X, Huang Q, Zhang W, Kong L, Lu JJ. Particle Beam Radiation Therapy for Skull Base Sarcomas. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1368. [PMID: 33042790 PMCID: PMC7525010 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To report the clinical experience of carbon-ion and proton radiation therapy for skull base sarcomas. Methods: An analysis of the retrospective data registry from the Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center for patients with skull base sarcomas was conducted. The 1-/2-year local relapse-free, distant metastasis-free, progression-free, and overall survival (LRFS, DMFS, PFS, OS) rates as well as associated prognostic indicators were analyzed. Radiotherapy-induced acute and late toxicities were summarized. Results: Between 7/2014 and 5/2019, 62 patients with skull base sarcomas of various subtypes received carbon-ion radiation therapy (53), proton radiation therapy (5), or proton radiation therapy + carbon-ion boost (4). With a median follow-up of 20.4 (range 2.73–91.67) months, the 1-/2-year OS, LRFS, DMFS, and PFS rates were 91.2%/80.2%, 89.2%/80.2%, 86.0%/81.1%, and 75.8%/62.9%, respectively. Grade 3 mucositis and grade 4 hemorrhage were observed in 1 patient for each. Only grade 1 and grade 2 toxicities were observed except for the same patient with grade 4 acute toxicity died of severe hemorrhage (grade 5). Multivariate analyses revealed the lack of prior RT was an independent favorable prognostic factor for OS, PFS, and LRFS, age under 40 was associated with improved OS, early T-disease (T1/2) showed a significant association with better PFS. Conclusion: With few observed acute and late toxicities, particle beam radiation therapy provided effective tumor control and overall survival for patients with skull base sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Weixu Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiyin Guan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiyi Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianxin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Qingting Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Wenna Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| | - Lin Kong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiade J Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Schaub L, Harrabi SB, Debus J. Particle therapy in the future of precision therapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20200183. [PMID: 32795176 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The first hospital-based treatment facilities for particle therapy started operation about thirty years ago. Since then, the clinical experience with protons and carbon ions has grown continuously and more than 200,000 patients have been treated to date. The promising clinical results led to a rapidly increasing number of treatment facilities and many new facilities are planned or under construction all over the world. An inverted depth-dose profile combined with potential radiobiological advantages make charged particles a precious tool for the treatment of tumours that are particularly radioresistant or located nearby sensitive structures. A rising number of trials have already confirmed the benefits of particle therapy in selected clinical situations and further improvements in beam delivery, image guidance and treatment planning are expected. This review summarises some physical and biological characteristics of accelerated charged particles and gives some examples of their clinical application. Furthermore, challenges and future perspectives of particle therapy will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Schaub
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Palmer JD, Gamez ME, Ranta K, Ruiz-Garcia H, Peterson JL, Blakaj DM, Prevedello D, Carrau R, Mahajan A, Chaichana KL, Trifiletti DM. Radiation therapy strategies for skull-base malignancies. J Neurooncol 2020; 150:445-462. [PMID: 32785868 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03569-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The management of skull base malignancies continues to evolve with improvements in surgical technique, advances in radiation delivery and novel systemic agents. METHODS In this review, we aim to discuss in detail the management of common skull base pathologies which typically require multimodality therapy, focusing on the radiotherapeutic aspects of care. RESULTS Technological advances in the administration of radiation therapy have led to a wide variety of different treatment strategies for the treatment of skull base malignances, with outcomes summarized herein. CONCLUSION Radiation treatment plays a key and critical role in the management of patients with skull base tumors. Recent advancements continue to improve the risk/benefit ratio for radiotherapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - M E Gamez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - K Ranta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - H Ruiz-Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - J L Peterson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - D Prevedello
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - R Carrau
- Department of Neurosurgery, The James Cancer Hospital at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - A Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - K L Chaichana
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - D M Trifiletti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA. .,Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Huang RX, Zhou PK. DNA damage response signaling pathways and targets for radiotherapy sensitization in cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther 2020; 5:60. [PMID: 32355263 PMCID: PMC7192953 DOI: 10.1038/s41392-020-0150-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 488] [Impact Index Per Article: 122.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2020] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is one of the most common countermeasures for treating a wide range of tumors. However, the radioresistance of cancer cells is still a major limitation for radiotherapy applications. Efforts are continuously ongoing to explore sensitizing targets and develop radiosensitizers for improving the outcomes of radiotherapy. DNA double-strand breaks are the most lethal lesions induced by ionizing radiation and can trigger a series of cellular DNA damage responses (DDRs), including those helping cells recover from radiation injuries, such as the activation of DNA damage sensing and early transduction pathways, cell cycle arrest, and DNA repair. Obviously, these protective DDRs confer tumor radioresistance. Targeting DDR signaling pathways has become an attractive strategy for overcoming tumor radioresistance, and some important advances and breakthroughs have already been achieved in recent years. On the basis of comprehensively reviewing the DDR signal pathways, we provide an update on the novel and promising druggable targets emerging from DDR pathways that can be exploited for radiosensitization. We further discuss recent advances identified from preclinical studies, current clinical trials, and clinical application of chemical inhibitors targeting key DDR proteins, including DNA-PKcs (DNA-dependent protein kinase, catalytic subunit), ATM/ATR (ataxia-telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related), the MRN (MRE11-RAD50-NBS1) complex, the PARP (poly[ADP-ribose] polymerase) family, MDC1, Wee1, LIG4 (ligase IV), CDK1, BRCA1 (BRCA1 C terminal), CHK1, and HIF-1 (hypoxia-inducible factor-1). Challenges for ionizing radiation-induced signal transduction and targeted therapy are also discussed based on recent achievements in the biological field of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui-Xue Huang
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Xiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 410078, Changsha, People's Republic of China
| | - Ping-Kun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Biology, Beijing Key Laboratory for Radiobiology, Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, AMMS, 100850, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- Institute for Chemical Carcinogenesis, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory, Guangzhou Medical University, 511436, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Terlizzi M, Le Pechoux C, Salas S, Rapeaud E, Lerouge D, Sunyach MP, Vogin G, Sole CV, Zilli T, Lutsyk M, Mampuya A, Calvo FA, Attal J, Karahissarlian V, De Bari B, Ozsahin M, Baumard F, Krengli M, Gomez-Brouchet A, Sargos P, Rochcongar G, Bazille C, Roth V, Salleron J, Thariat J. Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Patients with Extracranial Chondrosarcoma: A Joint Study of the French Sarcoma Group and Rare Cancer Network. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 107:726-735. [PMID: 32289473 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.03.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 03/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Postoperative radiation therapy (poRT) of intracranial/skull base chondrosarcomas (CHSs) is standard treatment. However, consensus is lacking for poRT in extracranial CHS (eCHS) owing to their easier resectability and intrinsic radioresistance. We assessed the practice and efficacy of poRT in eCHS. METHODS AND MATERIALS This multicentric retrospective study of the French Sarcoma Group/Rare Cancer Network included patients with eCHS who were operated on between 1985 and 2015. Inverse propensity score weighting (IPTW) was used to minimize poRT allocation biases. RESULTS Of 182 patients, 60.4% had bone and 39.6% had soft-tissue eCHS. eCHS were of conventional (31.9%), myxoid (28.6%; 41 extraskeletal, 11 skeletal), mesenchymal (9.9%), or other subtypes. En-bloc surgery with complete resection was performed in 52.6% and poRT in 36.8% of patients (median dose, 54 Gy). Irradiated patients had unfavorable initial characteristics, with higher grade and incomplete resection. Median follow-up time was 61 months. Five-year incidence of local relapse was 10% with poRT versus 21.6% without (P = .050). Using the IPTW method, poRT reduced the local relapse risk (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.52; P < .001). Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% with poRT and 64.2% without (P = .680). Using the IPTW method, poRT improved DFS (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.30-0.85; P = .010). The benefit of poRT on local relapse and DFS was confirmed after exclusion of the extraskeletal subtype. There was no difference in overall survival. Prognostic factors of poorer DFS in multivariate analysis were deeper location, higher grade, incomplete resection, and no poRT. CONCLUSIONS poRT should be offered in patients with eCHS and high-grade or incomplete resection, regardless of the histologic subtype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Terlizzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Sébastien Salas
- Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | - Etienne Rapeaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France
| | - Delphine Lerouge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France
| | | | - Guillaume Vogin
- Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - Claudio V Sole
- Clinica Instituto de Radiomedicina (IRAM) and Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile; Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Ange Mampuya
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Felipe A Calvo
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Berardino De Bari
- Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz," Université de Bourgogne-Franche Comté, Besançon, France
| | - Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Florian Baumard
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | | | - Paul Sargos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Céline Bazille
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Caen, Caen, France
| | | | - Julia Salleron
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Université de Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Baclesse/ARCHADE-Normandie Université, Caen, France; Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire, Caen, France; Unicaen-Normandie Université, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lu VM, O'Connor KP, Mahajan A, Carlson ML, Van Gompel JJ. Carbon ion radiotherapy for skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis of local control, survival, and toxicity outcomes. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:503-513. [PMID: 32206977 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03464-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is an emerging radiation therapy to treat skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas. To date, its use is limited to a few centers around the world, and there has been no attempt to systematically evaluate survival and toxicity outcomes reported in the literature. Correspondingly, the aim of this study was to qualitatively and quantitatively assess these outcomes. METHODS A systematic search of seven electronic databases from inception to November 2019 was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Articles were screened against pre-specified criteria. Outcomes were then pooled by random-effects meta-analyses of proportions. RESULTS A total of nine studies provided unique metadata for assessment, with six originating from Heidelberg, Germany. The surveyed cohort size was 632 patients, with 389 (62%) chordomas and 243 (38%) chondrosarcomas of the skull base. Across all studies, median cohort age at therapy and female proportion were 46 years and 51% respectively. Estimates of local control incidence at 1-, 5-, and 10-years in chordoma-only studies were 99%, 80%, and 56%, and in chondrosarcoma-only studies were 99%, 89%, and 88%. Estimates of overall survival probability at 1-, 5-, and 10-years in chordoma-only studies were 100%, 94%, and 78%, and in chondrosarcoma-only studies were 99%, 95%, and 79%. The incidence of early and late toxicity (Grade ≥ 3) ranged from 0 to 4% across all study groups. CONCLUSIONS The emerging use of CIRT to treat skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas appear promising with regard to tumor control, overall survival, and risk profile of early and late toxicity. The current literature suffers from the fact only a few centers in the world currently employ this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor M Lu
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| | - Kyle P O'Connor
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Matthew L Carlson
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Jamie J Van Gompel
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jäkel O. Physical advantages of particles: protons and light ions. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190428. [PMID: 31556333 PMCID: PMC7066975 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton and ion beam therapy has been introduced in the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the mid-1950s, when protons and helium ions have been used for the first time to treat patients. Starting in 1972, the scientists at Berkeley also were the first to use heavier ions (carbon, oxygen, neon, silicon and argon ions). The first clinical ion beam facility opened in 1994 in Japan and since then, the interest in radiotherapy with light ion beams has been increasing slowly but steadily, with 13 centers in clinical operation in 2019. All these centers are using carbon ions for clinical application.The article outlines the differences in physical properties of various light ions as compared to protons in view of the application in radiotherapy. These include the energy loss and depth dose properties, multiple scattering, range straggling and nuclear fragmentation. In addition, the paper discusses differences arising from energy loss and linear energy transfer with respect to their biological effects.Moreover, the paper reviews briefly the existing clinical data comparing protons and ions and outlines the future perspectives for the clinical use of ions like oxygen and helium.
Collapse
|
33
|
Seidensaal K, Harrabi SB, Uhl M, Debus J. Re-irradiation with protons or heavy ions with focus on head and neck, skull base and brain malignancies. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190516. [PMID: 31647306 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation can offer a potentially curative solution in case of progression after initial therapy; however, a second course of radiotherapy can be associated with an increased risk of severe side-effects. Particle therapy with protons and especially carbon ions spares surrounding tissue better than most photon techniques, thus it is of high potential for re-irradiation. Irradiation of tumors of the brain, head and neck and skull base involves several delicate risk organs, e.g. optic system, brainstem, salivary gland or swallowing muscles. Adequate local control rates with tolerable side-effects have been described for several tumors of these locations as meningioma, adenoid cystic carcinoma, chordoma or chondrosarcoma and head and neck tumors. High life time doses nonetheless lead to a different scope of side-effects, e.g. an enhanced rate of carotid blow outs has been reported. This review summarizes the current data on particle irradiation of the aforementioned locations and malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Seidensaal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Ben Harrabi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Uhl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Juergen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rackwitz T, Debus J. Clinical applications of proton and carbon ion therapy. Semin Oncol 2019; 46:226-232. [PMID: 31451309 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2019.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of cancer patients with charged particles like proton and carbon ions landmarks a new era in high-precision medicine. This review aims to summarize the physical and biological advantages of charged particle beams over conventional photon irradiation, presents some highlights in the treatment of selected tumor entities, and gives an update on previous and ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tilmann Rackwitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Held T, Windisch P, Akbaba S, Lang K, El Shafie R, Bernhardt D, Plinkert P, Kargus S, Rieken S, Herfarth K, Debus J, Adeberg S. Carbon Ion Reirradiation for Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer: A Single-Institutional Experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:803-811. [PMID: 31349059 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.07.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 06/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to assess the feasibility of carbon ion reirradiation (CIR) for recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC). METHODS AND MATERIALS This retrospective study included 229 patients with recurrent HNC who were treated with CIR between 2010 and 2017. We assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, pattern of failure, and toxicity. Of the primary tumors, 54.1% were adenoid cystic carcinomas, 26.2% were squamous cell carcinomas, 8.3% were adenocarcinomas, and 11.4% were other tumor entities. RESULTS The median radiation therapy interval was 3.9 years (range, 0.3-46.5 years), and patients received a median dose of 51 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 30-66 Gy [RBE]) in 3 Gy (RBE) fractions. The median cumulative lifetime dose after CIR was 132.8 Gy (range, 88.8-155.0 Gy). The median local progression-free survival after CIR was 24.2 months (95% confidence interval, 19.4-29.0 months), and the median overall survival was 26.1 months (95% confidence interval, 21.9-30.3 months). Serious acute toxicity (grade ≥3) after CIR included laryngeal edema, grade 4 (n = 2; 0.9%); dysphagia, grade 3 (n = 3; 1.3%); fistula, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%); and impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.4%). Late toxicities of grades 3 or higher (n = 18; 14.5%) included central nervous system necrosis, grades 4/3 (n = 1; 0.8%/n = 5; 4.0%); optic nerve disorder, grades 4/3 (n = 2; 1.6%/n = 2; 1.6%); impaired hearing, grade 3 (n = 5; 4.0%), osteonecrosis, grade 3 (n = 1; 0.8%); and carotid blowout, grade 4 (n = 1; 0.8%). CONCLUSIONS In patients with locally recurrent HNC, CIR was a feasible, effective treatment with acceptable toxicity and good local control. Thus, CIR represented a valuable alternative to surgical salvage and palliative chemotherapy in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Held
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Paul Windisch
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sati Akbaba
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristin Lang
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rami El Shafie
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Denise Bernhardt
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Kargus
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rieken
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Heidelberg University Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wu S, Li P, Cai X, Hong Z, Yu Z, Zhang Q, Fu S. Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Patients with Extracranial Chordoma or Chondrosarcoma - Initial Experience from Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center. J Cancer 2019; 10:3315-3322. [PMID: 31293634 PMCID: PMC6603407 DOI: 10.7150/jca.29667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with extracranial chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated by carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT). Patients and methods: Between May 2015 and April 2018, 21 consecutive patients with chordoma (n=16) or chondrosarcoma (n=5) treated by CIRT at Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center (SPHIC) were enrolled. The local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Association between each of the candidate prognostic factors and the estimated LC, PFS or OS was tested using the log rank test. Results: The median gross tumor volume (GTV) was 512.7 ml (range, 142.6-2893.0 ml). The median prescription dose was 69 gray equivalent (GyE) (range, 57-80 GyE). After a median follow-up of 21.8 months (range, 7.2-39.2 months), the 1-year LC, PFS, and OS were 93.8%, 88.4%, and 100%, respectively, whereas the 2-year LC, PFS, and OS were 85.2%, 80.4%, and 100%, respectively. A univariate analysis revealed that age, metal implant status, treatment status, sex, dose, and GTV were not significant prognostic factors for LC, PFS or OS. No grade 2 or higher early and late toxicities were observed within the follow-up. Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study are encouraging. Patients with extracranial chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated by CIRT in our center achieved a favorable shot-term outcome, without developing severe acute or late adverse events. The long-term results deserve further investigation, even in a prospective randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Xin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Zhengshan Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Zhan Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China
| | - Shen Fu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 201321, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai 201321, China.,Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Ion-Beam Application (MOE), Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Concord Cancer Hospital, Shanghai 200020, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hartfiel S, Häfner M, Perez RL, Rühle A, Trinh T, Debus J, Huber PE, Nicolay NH. Differential response of esophageal cancer cells to particle irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:119. [PMID: 31286978 PMCID: PMC6615091 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1326-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy is a mainstay in the treatment of esophageal cancer (EC) patients, and photon radiotherapy has proved beneficial both in the neoadjuvant and the definitive setting. However, regarding the still poor prognosis of many EC patients, particle radiation employing a higher biological effectiveness may help to further improve patient outcomes. However, the influence of clinically available particle radiation on EC cells remains largely unknown. Methods Patient-derived esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer lines were treated with photon and particle irradiation using clinically available proton (1H), carbon (12C) or oxygen (16O) beams at the Heidelberg Ion Therapy Center. Histology-dependent clonogenic survival was calculated for increasing physical radiation doses, and resulting relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was calculated for each radiation modality. Cell cycle effects caused by photon and particle radiation were assessed, and radiation-induced apoptosis was measured in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell EC samples by activated caspase-3 and sub-G1 populations. Repair kinetics of DNA double strand breaks induced by photon and particle radiation were investigated. Results While both adenocarcinoma EC cell lines demonstrated increasing sensitivities for 1H, 12C and 16O radiation, the two squamous cell carcinoma lines exhibited a more heterogeneous response to photon and particle treatment; average RBE values were calculated as 1.15 for 1H, 2.3 for 12C and 2.5 for 16O irradiation. After particle irradiation, squamous cell EC samples reacted with an increased and prolonged block in G2 phase of the cell cycle compared to adenocarcinoma cells. Particle radiation resulted in an incomplete repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks in both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma samples, with the levels of initial strand break induction correlating well with the individual cellular survival after photon and particle radiation. Similarly, EC samples demonstrated heterogeneous levels of radiation-induced apoptosis that also corresponded to the observed cellular survival of individual cell lines. Conclusions Esophageal cancer cells exhibit differential responses to irradiation with photons and 1H, 12C and 16O particles that were independent of tumor histology. Therefore, yet unknown molecular markers beyond histology may help to establish which esophageal cancer patients benefit from the biological effects of particle treatment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-019-1326-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Hartfiel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Matthias Häfner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ramon Lopez Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thuy Trinh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heavy Ion Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Molecular Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, University of Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Straße 3, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Freiburg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
The Role of Particle Therapy for the Treatment of Skull Base Tumors and Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS). Top Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 28:49-61. [PMID: 31022048 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay in the interdisciplinary treatment of brain tumors of the skull base and brain. Technical innovations during the past 2 decades have allowed for increasingly precise treatment with better sparing of adjacent healthy tissues to prevent treatment-related side effects that influence patients' quality of life. Particle therapy with protons and charged ions offer favorable kinetics with sharp dose deposition in a well-defined depth (Bragg-Peak) and a steep radiation fall-off beyond that maximum. This review highlights the role of particle therapy in the management of primary brain tumors and tumors of the skull base.
Collapse
|
39
|
Glowa C, Peschke P, Brons S, Debus J, Karger CP. Intrinsic and extrinsic tumor characteristics are of minor relevance for the efficacy of split-dose carbon ion irradiation in three experimental prostate tumors. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:120-124. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 12/18/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
40
|
Holtzman AL, Rotondo RL, Rutenberg MS, Indelicato DJ, Mercado CE, Rao D, Tavanaiepour D, Morris CG, Louis D, Flampouri S, Mendenhall WM. Proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcoma, a single-institution outcomes study. J Neurooncol 2019; 142:557-563. [PMID: 30827010 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03129-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of definitive or adjuvant external-beam proton therapy on local control and survival in patients with skull-base chondrosarcoma. METHODS We reviewed the medical records of 43 patients with a median age of 49 years (range, 23-80 years) treated with double-scattered 3D conformal proton therapy for skull-base chondrosarcomas between January 2007 and February 2016. Proton therapy-related toxicities were scored using CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS The median radiotherapy dose was 73.8 Gy(RBE) (range, 64.5-74.4 Gy[RBE]). Thirty-six (84%) and 7 (16%) patients underwent surgical resection or biopsy alone. Tumor grade distribution included: grade 1, 19 (44%) patients; grade 2, 22 (51%); and grade 3, 2 (5%). Forty patients had gross disease at the time of radiotherapy and 7 patients were treated for locally recurrent disease following surgery. The median follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.7-10.1 years). There were no acute grade 3 toxicities related to RT. At 4 years following RT, actuarial rates of overall survival, cause-specific survival, local control, and RT-related grade 3 toxicity-free survival were 95%, 100%, 89%, and 95%. CONCLUSION High-dose, double-scattered 3D conformal proton therapy alone or following surgical resection for skull-base chondrosarcoma is an effective treatment with a high rate of local control with no acute grade 3 radiation-related toxicity. Further follow-up of this cohort is necessary to better characterize long-term disease control and late toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam L Holtzman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA.
| | - Ronny L Rotondo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Michael S Rutenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Catherine E Mercado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Dinesh Rao
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Daryoush Tavanaiepour
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Debbie Louis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2015 N Jefferson St, Jacksonville, FL, 32206, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lopez Perez R, Nicolay NH, Wolf JC, Frister M, Schmezer P, Weber KJ, Huber PE. DNA damage response of clinical carbon ion versus photon radiation in human glioblastoma cells. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:77-86. [PMID: 30935585 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.12.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2018] [Revised: 12/14/2018] [Accepted: 12/30/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Carbon ion radiotherapy is a promising therapeutic option for glioblastoma patients due to its high physical dose conformity and greater biological effectiveness than photons. However, the biological effects of carbon ion radiation are still incompletely understood. Here, we systematically compared the biological effects of clinically used carbon ion radiation to photon radiation with emphasis on DNA repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two human glioblastoma cell lines (U87 and LN229) were irradiated with carbon ions or photons and DNA damage response was systematically analyzed, including clonogenic survival, induction and repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), cell cycle arrest and apoptosis or autophagy. γH2AX foci were analyzed by flow cytometry, conventional light microscopy and 3D superresolution microscopy. RESULTS DSBs were repaired delayed and with slower kinetics after carbon ions versus photons. Carbon ions caused stronger and longer-lasting cell cycle delays, predominantly in G2 phase, and a higher rate of apoptosis. Compared to photons, the effectiveness of carbon ions was less cell cycle-dependent. Homologous recombination (HR) appeared to be more important for DSB repair after carbon ions versus photons in phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-deficient U87 cells, as opposed to PTEN-proficient LN229 cells. CONCLUSION Carbon ions induced more severe DSB damage than photons, which was repaired less efficiently in both cell lines. Thus, carbon ion radiotherapy may help to overcome resistance mechanisms of glioblastoma associated with DNA repair for example in combination with repair pathway-specific drugs in the context of personalized radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramon Lopez Perez
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Freiburg University Medical Center, Germany
| | - Jörg-Christian Wolf
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Moritz Frister
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Peter Schmezer
- Epigenomics and Cancer Risk Factors, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus-Josef Weber
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany
| | - Peter E Huber
- CCU Molecular and Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center and Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Palm RF, Oliver DE, Yang GQ, Abuodeh Y, Naghavi AO, Johnstone PAS. The role of dose escalation and proton therapy in perioperative or definitive treatment of chondrosarcoma and chordoma: An analysis of the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer 2019; 125:642-651. [PMID: 30644538 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2018] [Revised: 11/02/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chordomas and chondrosarcomas are a rare but challenging subset of tumors to treat; however, previous studies have shown benefits from proton therapy, which are thought to be primarily driven by prescription conformality permitting homogeneous tumor dosing and the allowance of higher doses. No retrospective studies to date have directly compared the outcomes of conventional and particle therapy or examined the role of high doses (specifically ≥70 Gy) in definitive radiotherapy (DRT) or perioperative radiotherapy (PRT) for both types of malignancies. METHODS A total of 863 patients with chondrosarcoma and 715 patients with chordoma treated with nonpalliative proton or conventional radiation therapy with a dose range of 20 to 80 Gy and at least 15 months of follow-up were identified from the National Cancer Data Base for the years 2003-2014. The primary endpoint of overall survival (OS) was evaluated, and clinical features, including age, sex, grade, clinical stage, and Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, were compared. RESULTS Patients receiving DRT were older and had more advanced disease. In DRT for chondrosarcoma, a high dose (40.6% vs 16.9%; P = .006) and proton therapy (75.0% vs 19.1%; P = .046) were associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis. In DRT for chordoma, proton therapy was associated with improved OS at 5 years in a multivariate analysis (100% vs 34.1%; P = .031), and a high dose for chordoma was significant for improved OS in a univariate analysis with both DRT (79.0% vs 54.1%; P = .027) and PRT (83.3% vs 77.4%; P = .007). CONCLUSIONS In the largest retrospective series to date, dose escalation and proton radiotherapy were associated with improved OS in patients with chondrosarcoma and chordoma despite limited follow-up and access to particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Daniel E Oliver
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Q Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yazan Abuodeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A S Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Long term outcome of skull-base chondrosarcoma patients treated with high-dose proton therapy with or without conventional radiation therapy. Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:520-526. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
44
|
Lazar AA, Schulte R, Faddegon B, Blakely EA, Roach M. Clinical trials involving carbon-ion radiation therapy and the path forward. Cancer 2018; 124:4467-4476. [PMID: 30307603 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
To describe the international landscape of clinical trials in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), the authors reviewed the current status of 63 ongoing clinical trials (median, 47 participants) involving CIRT identified from the US clinicaltrials.gov trial registry and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Registry. The objectives were to evaluate the potential for these trials to define the role of this modality in the treatment of specific cancer types and identify the major challenges and opportunities to advance this technology. A significant body of literature suggested the potential for advantageous dose distributions and, in preclinical biologic studies, the enhanced effectiveness for CIRT compared with photons and protons. In addition, clinical evidence from phase I/II trials, although limited, indicated the potential for CIRT to improve cancer outcomes. However, current high-level phase III randomized clinical trial evidence does not exist. Although there has been an increase in the number of trials investigating CIRT since 2010, and the number of countries and sites offering CIRT is slowly growing, this progress has excluded other countries. Several recommendations are proposed to study this modality to accelerate progress in the field, including: 1) increasing the number of multinational randomized clinical trials, 2) leveraging the existing CIRT facilities to launch larger multinational trials directed at common cancers combined with high-level quality assurance; and 3) developing more compact and less expensive next-generation treatment systems integrated with radiobiologic research and preclinical testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann A Lazar
- Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California.,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF, San Francisco, California
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, California.,Department of Basic Sciences, Division of Biomedical Engineering Sciences, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California
| | - Bruce Faddegon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, California
| | - Eleanor A Blakely
- Division of Biological Systems and Engineering, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California
| | - Mack Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UCSF, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|