Efficacy and safety of tailored and dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy and trastuzumab for resected HER2-positive breast cancer: Results from the phase 3 PANTHER trial

Tailored Dose-Dense Versus Standard Adjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: End-of-Study Results of the Randomized PANTHER Trial

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.Although dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy administered once every 2 weeks leads to superior outcomes compared with standard regimens once every 3 weeks, the observed improvement is largely limited to studies using the suboptimal paclitaxel schedule once every 3 weeks as control. PANTHER is an international phase III trial which compared sequential epirubicin/cyclophosphamide and docetaxel administered either once every 2 or once every 3 weeks, with tailored dosing at the dose-dense schedule according to hematologic toxicity. In this end-of-study analysis, the median follow-up was 10.3 years. Compared with standard adjuvant chemotherapy, dose-dense treatment improved breast cancer recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.98]; P = .030), event-free survival (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.94]; P = .009), and distant disease-free survival (HR, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .030) while the improvement in overall survival was not statistically significant (HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04]; P = .109). To our knowledge, this is the first trial that confirms the benefit of a dose-dense regimen over a control regimen containing docetaxel once every 3 weeks.

Trastuzumab-Induced Cardiotoxicity: When and How Much Should We Worry?

This review critically analyzes the incidence of trastuzumab-induced left ventricular systolic dysfunction and congestive heart failure (CHF), distinguishing between cases with and without prior anthracycline exposure. It highlights the fact that the elevated risk of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity is closely associated with prior anthracycline exposure. In the absence of prior anthracycline exposure, the incidence rates of trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity, particularly CHF (ranging from 0% to 0.5%), are largely comparable with those reported in the general population, especially when reversibility is taken into account. Current cardiac surveillance recommendations during trastuzumab treatment have not yet adapted to the increasing adoption of nonanthracycline treatment strategies and the associated low risk of cardiotoxicity. We propose a refined monitoring protocol to reduce the frequency of cardiac evaluations for low-risk to moderate-risk patients, especially those receiving nonanthracycline treatments. By focusing on patients at high risk or those with prior anthracycline exposure, this strategy seeks to optimize the cost-effectiveness of cardiac care in oncology.

GAIN2 trial overall survival with intense versus tailored dose dense chemotherapy in early breast cancer

GAIN-2 trial evaluated the optimal intense dose-dense (idd) strategy for high-risk early breast cancer. This study reports the secondary endpoints pathological complete response (pCR) and overall survival (OS). Patients (n = 2887) were randomized 1:1 between idd epirubicin, nab-paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide (iddEnPC) versus leukocyte nadir-based tailored regimen of dose-dense EC and docetaxel (dtEC-dtD) as adjuvant therapy, with neoadjuvant therapy allowed after amendment. At median follow-up of 6.5 years (overall cohort) and 5.7 years (neoadjuvant cohort, N = 593), both regimens showed comparable 5-year OS rates (iddEnPC 90.8%, dtEC-dtD 90.0%, p = 0.320). In the neoadjuvant setting, iddEnPC yielded a higher pCR rate than dtEC-dtD (51.2% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.045). Patients achieving pCR had significantly improved 5-year iDFS (88.7% vs. 70.1%, HR 0.33, p < 0.001) and OS rates (93.9% vs. 83.1%, HR 0.32, p < 0.001), but OS outcomes were comparable regardless of pCR status. Thus, iddEnPC demonstrates superior pCR rates compared to dtEC-dtD, yet with comparable survival outcomes.

Risk-Based Therapeutic Strategies for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Consensus Paper

Breast cancer represents the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm worldwide and the HER2-positive subtype accounts for nearly 1 in 5 breast cancers. The majority of patients with breast cancer present with an early-stage disease upon diagnosis, which is thus susceptible to virtually curative treatment strategies. For a stage, I T1a/b N0 HER2-positive disease, upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy is the preferred approach. However, there is some uncertainty regarding the appropriate management of stage cT1c cN0, as both the neoadjuvant approach and upfront surgery have been proven to be feasible therapeutic options. The aim of this Delphi consensus was to define the best strategies for the treatment of early HER2-positive breast cancer. This work may help clinicians in the management of early HER2-positive breast cancer.

The prognostic value and immune microenvironment association of AR in HER2+ nonmetastatic breast cancer

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of AR in HER2+ nonmetastatic breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and its relationship with the immune microenvironment. HER2+ nonmetastatic breast IDC patients diagnosed by pathology who underwent surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from 2016 to 2017 were included. AR+ and AR- breast IDC samples were matched 1:1 in age, T stage, and N stage for immune infiltration analysis. A total of 554 patients with HER2+ nonmetastatic breast cancer were included in this retrospective study, regardless of HR status. The cut-off value for AR was set at 10%. ER+ (p < 0.001) and PR+ (p < 0.001) were associated with positive AR expression. Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis suggested that AR was closely correlated with overall survival (OS) (p = 0.001) but not disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.051). After eliminating the potential impact caused by HR, AR also predicted longer OS (p = 0.014) and was an independent predictive factor for OS of HER2+HR- nonmetastatic breast IDC patients, as revealed by multivariate analysis (p = 0.036). For AR+ and AR- matched HER2+HR- patients, TILs (p = 0.043) and PD-L1 (p = 0.027) levels were significantly lower in AR+ patients. The strongest negative correlation was observed between AR and PD-L1 (Pearson's r = -0.299, p = 0.001). AR+ status was markedly related to better OS in HER2+HR- nonmetastatic breast cancer patients, while a negative correlation was observed between AR and PD-L1/TILs. We provide new insights into the prognostic value of AR and its association with the immune microenvironment to optimize treatment strategies in HER2+ nonmetastatic breast IDCs.

Novel 5-Fluorouracil Carbonate-Loaded Liposome: Preparation, In Vitro, and In Vivo Evaluation as an Antitumor Agent

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a chemotherapeutic drug against many types of cancers, especially colorectal cancer. However, its short plasma half-life and serious adverse reactions limit its wide clinical applications. To overcome these shortcomings, a novel lipophilic 5-FU carbonate [XL-01, (5-fluoro-2,4-dioxo-3,4-dihydropyrimidin-1(2H)-yl) methyl tetradecyl carbonate] was designed, synthesized, and encapsulated into liposome (LipoXL-01) by a thin-film dispersion method through formulation screening and optimization. LipoXL-01 was characterized by a particle size of around 100 nm, polydispersity index of 0.200, ζ-potential value of -41 mV, encapsulation efficiency of 93.9%, and drug-loading efficiency of 11.6%. The cellular uptake of LipoXL-01 was increased in a concentration-dependent manner on HCT15 cells. LipoXL-01 could enhance the induction of cell apoptosis and the inhibition of cell migration and arrest the ability of the cell cycle at the S-phase on HCT15 cells better than 5-FU. Additionally, LipoXL-01 exhibited a slow drug release profile with a cumulative release rate of 12% in 8 h. The results of pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies revealed that LipoXL-01 had a long plasma half-life (7.21 h) and a high tumor accumulation (733 nmol/g at 8 h). The in vivo antitumor effect study also showed that LipoXL-01 had more potent efficacy than 5-FU (65 vs 48% of the tumor-inhibition rate). Simultaneously, negligible systemic toxicity was observed via analyzing the body weight as well as hematological and pathological parameters in the tested mice. The current study suggested that LipoXL-01 might be a promising nanocandidate for chemotherapy of colorectal cancer.

Dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy in the trastuzumab era: final long-term results of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase III HE10/05 Trial

BACKGROUND

Dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with anthracyclines and taxanes achieved an 18% reduction of recurrence risk in early breast cancer (BC). The optimal chemotherapy schedule and interval between cycles remain under investigation.

METHODS

Overall, 990 patients were randomised to receive either three cycles of epirubicin (E, 110 mg/m²) every 2 weeks followed by 3 cycles of paclitaxel (T, 200 mg/m²) every 2 weeks followed by three cycles of intensified CMF (Control Arm A, E-T-CMF) that was previously used in BC or three cycles of epirubicin followed by three cycles of CMF followed by nine consecutive weekly cycles of docetaxel (wD) 35 mg/m² (Arm B, E-CMF-wD) or nine consecutive weekly cycles of paclitaxel (wT) 80 mg/m² (Arm C, E-CMF-wT). Trastuzumab was administered for HER2-positive disease.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 13.3 years, 330 disease-free survival (DFS) events (33.3%) were reported. DFS and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients in the combined B and C arms versus arm A either in the entire cohort (HR = 0.90, P = 0.38 and HR = 0.85, P = 0.20) or among trastuzumab-treated patients (HR = 0.69, P = 0.13 and HR = 0.67, P = 0.13). Thirty-four patients (3.4%) developed secondary neoplasms.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, no significant differences in survival were found amongst the studied regimens after a long-term observational period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000151033.

Risk of heart disease following treatment for breast cancer: results from a population-based cohort study

Background: There is a rising concern about treatment-associated cardiotoxicities in breast cancer patients. This study aimed to determine the time- and treatment-specific incidence of arrhythmia, heart failure and ischemic heart disease in women diagnosed with breast cancer.

Methods: A register-based matched cohort study was conducted including 8015 breast cancer patients diagnosed from 2001-2008 in the Stockholm-Gotland region and followed-up until 2017. Time-dependent risks of arrhythmia, heart failure and ischemic heart disease in breast cancer patients were assessed using flexible parametric models as compared to matched controls from general population. Treatment-specific effects were estimated in breast cancer patients using Cox model.

Results: Time-dependent analyses revealed long-term increased risks of arrhythmia and heart failure following breast cancer diagnosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) within the first year of diagnosis were 2.14 (95% CI = 1.63-2.81) for arrhythmia and 2.71 (95% CI = 1.70-4.33) for heart failure. HR more than 10 years following diagnosis was 1.42 (95% CI = 1.21-1.67) for arrhythmia and 1.28 (95% CI = 1.03-1.59) for heart failure. The risk for ischemic heart disease was significantly increased only during the first year after diagnosis (HR=1.45, 95% CI = 1.03-2.04). Trastuzumab and anthracyclines were associated with increased risk of heart failure. Aromatase inhibitors, but not tamoxifen, were associated with risk of ischemic heart disease. No increased risk of heart disease was identified following loco-regional radiotherapy.

Conclusions: Administration of systemic adjuvant therapies appears to be associated with increased risks of heart disease. The risk estimates observed in this study may aid adjuvant therapy decision-making and patient counseling in oncology practices.

Funding: This work was supported by the Swedish Research Council [grant no: 2018-02547]; Swedish Cancer Society [grant no: CAN-19-0266] and FORTE [grant no: 2016-00081].

Impact of Value Frameworks on the Magnitude of Clinical Benefit: Evaluating a Decade of Randomized Trials for Systemic Therapy in Solid Malignancies

In the era of rapid development of new, expensive cancer therapies, value frameworks have been developed to quantify clinical benefit (CB). We assessed the evolution of CB since the 2015 introduction of The American Society of Clinical Oncology and The European Society of Medical Oncology value frameworks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing systemic therapies for solid malignancies from 2010 to 2020 were evaluated and CB (Δ) in 2010–2014 (pre-value frameworks (PRE)) were compared to 2015–2020 (POST) for overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and quality of life (QoL). In the 485 studies analyzed (12% PRE and 88% POST), the most common primary endpoint was PFS (49%), followed by OS (20%), RR (12%), and QoL (6%), with a significant increase in OS and decrease in RR as primary endpoints in the POST era (p = 0.011). Multivariable analyses revealed significant improvement in ΔOS POST (OR 2.86, 95% CI 0.46 to 5.26, p = 0.02) while controlling for other variables. After the development of value frameworks, median ΔOS improved minimally. The impact of value frameworks has yet to be fully realized in RCTs. Efforts to include endpoints shown to impact value, such as QoL, into clinical trials are warranted.

Interplay between copy number alterations and immune profiles in the early breast cancer Scandinavian Breast Group 2004-1 randomized phase II trial: results from a feasibility study

Emerging data indicate that genomic alterations can shape immune cell composition in early breast cancer. However, there is a need for complementary imaging and sequencing methods for the quantitative assessment of combined somatic copy number alteration (SCNA) and immune profiling in pathological samples. Here, we tested the feasibility of three approaches-CUTseq, for high-throughput low-input SCNA profiling, multiplexed fluorescent immunohistochemistry (mfIHC) and digital-image analysis (DIA) for quantitative immuno-profiling- in archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue samples from patients enrolled in the randomized SBG-2004-1 phase II trial. CUTseq was able to reproducibly identify amplification and deletion events with a resolution of 100 kb using only 6 ng of DNA extracted from FFPE tissue and pooling together 77 samples into the same sequencing library. In the same samples, mfIHC revealed that CD4 + T-cells and CD68 + macrophages were the most abundant immune cells and they mostly expressed PD-L1 and PD-1. Combined analysis showed that the SCNA burden was inversely associated with lymphocytic infiltration. Our results set the basis for further applications of CUTseq, mfIHC and DIA to larger cohorts of early breast cancer patients.

Advancements in Human Breast Cancer Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy

Human breast cancer treatment regimens have evolved greatly due to the significant advances in understanding the molecular mechanisms and pathways of the common subtypes of breast cancer. In this review, we discuss recent progress in breast cancer targeted therapy and immunotherapy as well as ongoing clinical trials. We also highlight the potential of combination therapies and personalized approaches to improve clinical outcomes. Targeted therapies have surpassed the hormone receptors and the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) to include many other molecules in targetable pathways such as the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP), and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6). However, resistance to targeted therapy persists, underpinning the need for more efficacious therapies. Immunotherapy is considered a milestone in breast cancer treatments, including the engineered immune cells (CAR-T cell therapy) to better target the tumor cells, vaccines to stimulate the patient's immune system against tumor antigens, and checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA4) to block molecules that mediate immune inhibition. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy tested in breast cancer clinical trials are discussed here, with special emphasis on combinatorial approaches which are believed to maximize treatment efficacy and enhance patient survival.

Impact of dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathologic response and survival for HER2-positive breast cancer patients who receive trastuzumab

To compare outcomes in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer who received either dose-dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with trastuzumab or standard-interval chemotherapy with trastuzumab. Patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received NAC, including epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel with trastuzumab were included. Patients were divided into either the dose-dense or standard-interval group. We compared pathologic complete remission (pCR), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), event-free survival (EFS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) between the two groups. Two hundred (49.6%) patients received dose-dense NAC, and 203 (50.4%) received standard-interval NAC. The pCR rate was 38.4% in the dose-dense group and 29.2% in the standard-interval group (P = 0.052). In patients with lymph node (LN) metastases, the LN pCR rate was 70.9% in the dose-dense group and 56.5% in the standard-interval group (P = 0.037). After a median follow-up of 54.6 months, dose-dense chemotherapy presented an improvement on DDFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.19–1.28, EFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.24–1.21), and BCSS (HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.11–1.51), but the difference was not significant. Compared with standard-interval chemotherapy, dose-dense chemotherapy resulted in a superior 5-year DDFS (100% vs. 75.3%, P = 0.017) and 5-year EFS (96.9% vs. 78.3%, P = 0.022) in patients younger than 40 years. HER2-positive patients can achieve a higher LN pCR rate with dose-dense NAC than with standard-interval NAC with trastuzumab. Better survival may also be achieved with dose-dense chemotherapy with trastuzumab than with standard-interval chemotherapy with trastuzumab among young patients (age ≤ 40 years).

Comparative hematological profiles for dose-dense vs. regular anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in non-metastatic breast cancer

The aim of the present study was to examine both the feasibility and toxicity of neoadjuvant dose-dense chemotherapy in women with non-metastatic breast cancer. A search within the OncoHelp Association breast cancer database has been performed in order to identify all non-metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent an initial consultation with a medical oncologist between March 2016 and April 2020. The inclusion criteria used were: i) Age, ii) follow-up care obtained at OncoHelp Association, iii) the intent to treat with a neoadjuvant dose-dense anthracycline every two weeks for four cycles (C1-C4) followed by paclitaxel every two weeks for four cycles, with white blood cell growth factor support, and iv) regular anthracycline-based chemotherapy every three weeks for four cycles, followed by paclitaxel every three weeks for four cycles, v) weight, vi) height, vii) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, viii) hemoglobin (Hb) level, ix) Platelet count and x) neutrophil count.

Uridine Glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 Polymorphism-Based Pharmacogenetic Dosing of Epirubicin in FEC Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Epirubicin is metabolized by uridine glucuronosyltransferase 2B7 (UGT2B7). Patients homozygous for the minor allele (CC) in the UGT2B7 -161 promoter polymorphism have lower clearance and significantly higher rates of leukopenia compared to wild-type homozygote (TT) or heterozygote (CT) patients. This study was designed to determine if TT and CT genotype patients could tolerate a higher epirubicin dose compared to CC genotype patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We studied women with histologically confirmed non-metastatic, invasive breast cancer who were scheduled to receive at least three cycles of FE₁₀₀C in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Patients received standard-dose FE₁₀₀C during the first 21-day cycle. Based on genotype, the epirubicin dose was escalated in the second and third cycles to 115 and 130 mg/m² or to 120 and 140 mg/m² for CT and TT genotype patients, respectively. The main outcome measurements were myelosuppression and dose-limiting toxicity. These were analyzed for relationships with the three genotypes.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were enrolled (10 CC, 21 CT, and 14 TT genotypes) and received 100 mg/m² of epirubicin in the first cycle. Twelve and 10 TT patients were dose escalated at the second and third cycles, respectively; 16 CT patients were dose escalated at the second and third cycles. Leukopenia, but not febrile neutropenia, was genotype and dose dependent and increased in patients with CT and TT genotypes as their dose was increased. However, the third-cycle leukopenia rates were comparable to patients with the CC genotype receiving standard-dose epirubicin.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacogenetically guided epirubicin dosing is well tolerated and allowed dose escalation without increased toxicity.

Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

A subcutaneous formulation of pertuzumab and trastuzumab with recombinant human hyaluronidase in one ready-to-use, fixed-dose combination vial (pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and hyaluronidase-zzxf) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on June 29, 2020. We report the primary analysis of the FeDeriCa study, which was designed to assess the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of the fixed-dose subcutaneous formulation compared to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in the neoadjuvant-adjuvant setting.

METHODS

FeDeriCa, a randomised, open-label, international, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study, was done across 106 sites in 19 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, HER2-positive, operable, locally advanced, or inflammatory stage II-IIIC breast cancer, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 55% or more were randomly assigned (1:1), using a voice-based or web-based response system, to receive intravenous pertuzumab (840 mg loading dose, followed by 420 mg maintenance doses) plus intravenous trastuzumab (8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance doses) or the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (1200 mg pertuzumab plus 600 mg trastuzumab loading dose in 15 mL, followed by 600 mg pertuzumab plus 600 mg trastuzumab maintenance doses in 10 mL), both administered every 3 weeks with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were stratified by hormone receptor status, clinical stage, and chemotherapy regimen. The investigator selected one of the two protocol-approved standard chemotherapy regimens before randomisation. Four cycles of HER2-targeted therapy were administered concurrently with the taxane. After surgery, patients continued the HER2-targeted therapy to receive an additional 14 cycles (total of 18). The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of the cycle 7 pertuzumab serum trough concentration (C_trough; ie, cycle 8 predose pertuzumab concentration) within the fixed-dose combination for subcutaneous injection versus intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in the per-protocol pharmacokinetic population (all enrolled patients who adhered to prespecified criteria for pharmacokinetic assessment). Non-inferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 90% CI of the geometric mean ratio was 0·8 or higher. The safety population included all patients who received at least one dose of study medication, including chemotherapy or HER2-targeted therapy. Enrolment, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgery have been completed; adjuvant treatment and follow-up are ongoing. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03493854.

FINDINGS

Between June 14, 2018, and Dec 24, 2018, 252 patients were randomly assigned to the intravenous infusion group and 248 to the fixed-dose combination group. The geometric mean ratio of pertuzumab serum C_trough subcutaneous to serum C_trough intravenous was 1·22 (90% CI 1·14-1·31). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events occurring during neoadjuvant treatment with HER2-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy in 5% or more of patients were neutropenia (34 [13%] of 252 patients in the intravenous infusion group vs 35 [14%] of 248 patients in the fixed-dose combination group), decreased neutrophil count (31 [12%] vs 27 [11%]), febrile neutropenia (14 [6%] vs 16 [6%]), diarrhoea (12 [5%] vs 17 [7%]), and decreased white blood cell count (18 [7%] vs nine [4%]). At least one treatment-related serious adverse event was reported in 25 (10%) patients in the intravenous infusion group and 26 (10%) patients in the fixed-dose combination group. One patient in each treatment group had an adverse event that led to death (urosepsis in the intravenous infusion group and acute myocardial infarction in the fixed-dose combination group); neither death was related to HER2-targeted therapy.

INTERPRETATION

The study met its primary endpoint: the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection provides non-inferior cycle 7 pertuzumab serum C_trough concentrations to intravenous pertuzumab plus trastuzumab in the neoadjuvant setting with comparable total pathological complete response rates, supporting the FDA approval. Safety was similar between treatment groups, and in line with other pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy trials. Follow-up is ongoing for long-term outcomes, including efficacy and long-term safety.

FUNDING

F Hoffmann-La Roche and Genentech.