1
|
Rosenberg SM, Zheng Y, Ruddy K, Poorvu PD, Snow C, Kirkner GJ, Meyer ME, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Peppercorn J, Come S, Borges VF, Warner E, Gelber S, Collins L, Winer EP, Partridge AH. Helping ourselves, helping others: the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS) - a multisite prospective cohort study to advance the understanding of breast cancer diagnosed in women aged 40 years and younger. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081157. [PMID: 38951008 PMCID: PMC11218027 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Compared with older women diagnosed with breast cancer, younger women are more likely to die of breast cancer and more likely to suffer psychosocially in both the short-term and long term. The Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (YWS) is a multisite prospective cohort study established to address gaps in our knowledge about this vulnerable and understudied population. PARTICIPANTS The YWS enrolled 1302 women newly diagnosed with stages 0-IV breast cancer at age 40 years or younger at 13 academic and community sites in North America between 2006 and 2016. Longitudinal patient-reported outcome data are complemented by clinical data abstraction and biospecimen collection at multiple timepoints. FINDINGS TO DATE Key findings related to fertility include that nearly 40% of participants were interested in pregnancy following diagnosis; of those who reported interest, 10% pursued fertility preservation. Overall, approximately 10% of YWS participants became pregnant in the first 5 years after diagnosis; follow-up is ongoing for pregnancies after 5 years. Studies focused on psychosocial outcomes have characterised quality of life, post-traumatic stress and fear of recurrence, with findings detailing the factors associated with the substantial psychosocial burden many young women face during and following active treatment. Multiple studies have leveraged YWS biospecimens, including whole-exome sequencing of tumour analyses that revealed that select somatic alterations occur at different frequencies in young (age≤35) versus older women with luminal A breast cancer, and a study that explored clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential found it to be rare in young survivors. FUTURE PLANS With a median follow-up of approximately 10 years, the cohort is just maturing for many relevant long-term outcomes and provides outstanding opportunities to further study and build collaborations to address gaps in our knowledge, with the ultimate objective to improve care and outcomes for young women with breast cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT01468246.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yue Zheng
- Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn Ruddy
- Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Craig Snow
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory J Kirkner
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Meghan E Meyer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Lidia Schapira
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Steven Come
- Medical Oncology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Virginia F Borges
- Medical Oncology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Ellen Warner
- Medical Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shari Gelber
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laura Collins
- Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Eric P Winer
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Yale University Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Charpentier P, Cavalieri M, Desmoulins I, Coutant C. [Live birth rates after breast cancer among women who desired a child]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:463-472. [PMID: 38580527 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In France, the breast cancer is the most common cancer among women under the age of 40. From 38 to 70% of women have not fulfilled their parental plans at the time of diagnosis. The gonadotoxicity of the treatments and the follicular physiological decline linked to age can become an obstacle to this project. METHODS Among the patients, 386 were treated for breast cancer at the Centre Georges-François-Leclerc in Dijon between January 2011 and December 2018 were identified. 192 patients aged under 39 met the inclusion criteria. We excluded metastatic cancers, cancer in situ and pregnant patients at diagnosis. A total of 124 patients agreed to participate in the study. The included patients filled out a self-questionnaire. Data were collected from the patient's electronic medical. The primary endpoint of this study was the live birth rate. RESULT Among women who desired a child after breast cancer, the overall rate of live births was 36.2 % (21/58). Most achieved pregnancies were spontaneous (90.5 %). No factor was significantly associated with the absence of obtaining birth. Fertility was preserved by oocyte cryopreservation in 13.8 % of patients (17/124). The median time to conception in patients who received chemotherapy was 8 months [1.0-60.0] vs 2 months [1.0-7.0] in women who did not receive chemotherapy. DISCUSSION The non-negligible proportion of live births following spontaneous pregnancy after breast cancer allows us to be reassuring for patients. However, the emergence of new chemotherapy protocols whose consequences on long-term gonadotoxicity are still not well known requires further studies and prompts the promotion of fertility preservation as a precautionary measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pauline Charpentier
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU François-Mitterrand, Cote d'Or, Dijon, France.
| | - Mathilde Cavalieri
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, CHU François-Mitterrand, Cote d'Or, Dijon, France
| | - Isabelle Desmoulins
- Centre Francois-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, Cote d'Or, 21000 France
| | - Charles Coutant
- Centre Francois-Leclerc, 1, rue du Professeur-Marion, Cote d'Or, 21000 France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Peigné M, Mur P, Laup L, Hamy AS, Sifer C, Mayeur A, Eustache F, Sarandi S, Vinolas C, Rakrouki S, Benoit A, Grynberg M, Sonigo C. Fertility outcomes several years after urgent fertility preservation for patients with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 2024:S0015-0282(24)00265-6. [PMID: 38679360 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study the fertility outcomes of women who tried to conceive after breast cancer (BC) treatment and fertility preservation. DESIGN Retrospective observational, bicentric cohort study. SETTING University hospital. PATIENTS Patients with BC. INTERVENTION All patients who had undergone fertility preservation before BC treatment between January 2013 and July 2019 were included (n = 844). The endpoint date was March 1, 2022. Patients with missing data on pregnancy attempts after a cancer diagnosis (n = 195) were excluded from the pregnancy analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cumulative incidences of pregnancy and live birth (LB) were calculated. For women who became pregnant, the time to conception was calculated between the first fertility preservation consultation and the estimated day of conception. For those who did not conceive, we considered the time between the first fertility preservation consultation and the endpoint date, or the date of patient death. A Cox regression model was used to study the predictive factors for pregnancy and LB. RESULTS Among the 649 patients with available data on pregnancy attempts after BC diagnosis, 255 (39.3% [35.5-43.2]) tried to conceive (median follow-up of 6.5 years). Overall, 135 (52.9% [46.6-59.2]) of these patients achieved a pregnancy, mainly through unassisted conception (79.3% [72.8-84.8]), and 99 reported an LB (representing 38.8% of patients who attempted conception). In our cohort, 48 months after the first fertility preservation consultation, the cumulative incidence of pregnancy was 33.1% ([27.6-37.9]). After adjustment for age, parity, type of chemotherapy administration, and endocrine therapy, only multiparity at diagnosis and absence of chemotherapy were positive predictive factors of pregnancy after cancer. Of the 793 patients who had vitrified oocytes and embryos, 68 used them (27% [21.3-32.5] of the patients who tried to conceive), resulting in 8 LBs (11.8% [5.2-21.9]). Women who used their cryopreserved oocytes and embryos were older at the first consultation of fertility preservation (hazard ratio 1.71 [1.42-2.21]), and chose more often to vitrify embryos (hazard ratio 1.76 [1.28-2.23]). CONCLUSION Although pregnancy rates after fertility preservation for patients with BC are low, most conceptions are achieved without medical assistance. Our findings provide useful information to advise women on the different techniques of fertility preservation, their efficacy, and safety, as well as the relatively high chances of unassisted conception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maëliss Peigné
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France.
| | - Pauline Mur
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Antoine Beclère Hospital, AP-HP-Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France
| | - Laëtitia Laup
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Anne-Sophie Hamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Sifer
- Embryology Unit, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Anne Mayeur
- Histology-Embryology-Cytogenetic Laboratory, Antoine Beclère Hospital, AP-HP-Université Paris- Saclay, Clamart, France
| | - Florence Eustache
- Le Centre d'Études et de Conservation des Œufs et du Sperme (CECOS), Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Solmaz Sarandi
- Embryology Unit, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Claire Vinolas
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Sophia Rakrouki
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France
| | - Alexandra Benoit
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Antoine Beclère Hospital, AP-HP-Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France
| | - Michaël Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Jean Verdier Hospital, AP-HP-Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Bondy, France; Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Antoine Beclère Hospital, AP-HP-Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France
| | - Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Antoine Beclère Hospital, AP-HP-Université Paris-Saclay, Clamart, France; Physiologie et Physiopathologie Endocrinienne, Inserm, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mannion S, Higgins A, Larson N, Stewart EA, Khan Z, Shenoy C, Nichols HB, Su HI, Partridge AH, Loprinzi CL, Couch F, Olson JE, Ruddy KJ. Prevalence and impact of fertility concerns in young women with breast cancer. Sci Rep 2024; 14:4418. [PMID: 38388636 PMCID: PMC10884010 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54961-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Survey data from the Mayo Clinic Breast Disease Registry were used to assess fertility counseling and fertility preservation strategies in a modern cohort of young women with breast cancer. One hundred respondents were identified who were under age 50 at the time of breast cancer diagnosis and who expressed interest in future childbearing near the time of diagnosis and/or 1 year later. Ninety-three percent of the 81 respondents to the year one survey recalled fertility counseling prior to cancer treatment. Most who reported a high level of fertility concern declared that this concern had impacted their treatment decisions, often shortening their planned duration of endocrine therapy. Approximately half had taken steps to preserve future fertility, and a third had used a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist either alone or combined with another method (e.g., embryo or oocyte cryopreservation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexandra Higgins
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Nicole Larson
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | | | - Zaraq Khan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Chandra Shenoy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - H Irene Su
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Charles L Loprinzi
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Fergus Couch
- Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Janet E Olson
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sorouri K, Sella T, Rosenberg SM, Loucks M, Kirkner G, Snow C, Ruddy KJ, Gelber SI, Tamimi RM, Peppercorn JM, Schapira L, Borges VF, Come SE, Warner E, Partridge AH. Conception and pregnancy among women with a live birth after breast cancer treatment: A survey study of young breast cancer survivors. Cancer 2024; 130:517-529. [PMID: 37880931 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer (BC) is the most common malignancy in women of reproductive age. This study sought to explore the postcancer conception and pregnancy experience of young BC survivors to inform counseling. METHODS In the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a multicenter, prospective cohort, participants diagnosed at age ≤40 years with stage 0-III BC who reported ≥1 postdiagnosis live birth were sent an investigator-developed survey. RESULTS Of 119 eligible women, 94 (79%) completed the survey. Median age at diagnosis was 32 years (range, 17-40) and at first postdiagnosis delivery was 38 years (range, 29-47). Most had stage I or II (77%) and HR+ (78%) BC; 51% were nulligravida at diagnosis. After BC treatment, most (62%) conceived naturally, though 38% used assisted reproductive technology, 74% of whom first attempted natural conception for a median of 9 months (range, 2-48). Among women with a known inherited pathogenic variant (n = 20), two underwent preimplantation genetic testing. Of 59 women on endocrine therapy before pregnancy, 26% did not resume treatment. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (20%) was the most common obstetrical condition. Nine percent of newborns required neonatal intensive care unit admission and 9% had low birth weight. CONCLUSION Among women with live births after BC treatment, most conceived naturally and having a history of BC did not appear to negatively impact pregnancy complications, though the high rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy warrants further investigation. The prolonged period of attempting natural conception for some survivors suggests the potential need for improved understanding and counseling surrounding family planning goals after BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimia Sorouri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tal Sella
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Shoshana M Rosenberg
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maggie Loucks
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory Kirkner
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Craig Snow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kathryn J Ruddy
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Shari I Gelber
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rulla M Tamimi
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Peppercorn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Virginia F Borges
- University of Colorado Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven E Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ellen Warner
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Meernik C, Engel SM, Wardell A, Baggett CD, Gupta P, Rodriguez-Ormaza N, Luke B, Baker VL, Wantman E, Rauh-Hain JA, Mersereau JE, Olshan AF, Smitherman AB, Cai J, Nichols HB. Disparities in fertility preservation use among adolescent and young adult women with cancer. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:1435-1444. [PMID: 35169982 PMCID: PMC9378772 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-022-01187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Women face multiple barriers to fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis, but few studies have examined disparities in use of these services. METHODS Women aged 15-39 years diagnosed with cancer during 2004-2015 were identified from the North Carolina Central Cancer Registry and linked to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System. Women who cryopreserved oocytes or embryos for fertility preservation (n = 96) were compared to women who received gonadotoxic treatment but did not use fertility preservation (n = 7964). Conditional logistic and log-binomial regression were used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) or prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS Few adolescent and young adult women with cancer in our study (1.2%) used fertility preservation. In multivariable regression, women less likely to use fertility preservation were older at diagnosis (ages 25-29 vs. 35-39: OR = 6.27, 95% CI: 3.35, 11.73); non-Hispanic Black (vs. non-Hispanic White: PR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.79); and parous at diagnosis (vs. nulliparous: PR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.13, 0.45); or lived in census tracts that were non-urban (vs. urban: PR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.04, 0.37) or of lower socioeconomic status (quintiles 1-3 vs. quintiles 4 and 5: PR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.25, 0.61). CONCLUSIONS Women with cancer who were older, non-Hispanic Black, parous, or living in areas that were non-urban or of lower socioeconomic position were less likely to use fertility preservation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Clinical and policy interventions are needed to ensure equitable access to fertility services among women facing cancer treatment-related infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Meernik
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
| | - Stephanie M Engel
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Ally Wardell
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Christopher D Baggett
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Parul Gupta
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Nidia Rodriguez-Ormaza
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Barbara Luke
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Valerie L Baker
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jennifer E Mersereau
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrew F Olshan
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| | - Andrew B Smitherman
- Department of Pediatrics and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jianwen Cai
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health, 135 Dauer Dr., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Azizi M, Ebrahimi E, Moghadam ZB, Shahhosseini Z, Modarres M. Pregnancy rate, maternal and neonatal outcomes among breast cancer survivors: A systematic review. Nurs Open 2023; 10:6690-6707. [PMID: 37528519 PMCID: PMC10495738 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.1941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM This study investigated the pregnancy rate, maternal and neonatal outcomes, and breast cancer (BC) recurrence status after pregnancy among BC survivors. DESIGN A systematic review. METHODS Electronic databases such as PubMed, Web of Science [WOS], Scopus, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, and Scientific Information Database were systematically searched. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Observational studies reported the pregnancy rate, maternal and neonatal outcomes among reproductive-aged BC survivors, and the recurrence status of BC after pregnancy were eligible to include in this study. RESULTS Of the 29 included studies, 13 studies were prospective cohorts or prospective multicenter or population-based cohorts, 14 studies were retrospective cohort or retrospective population-based cohort studies, and two studies were cross-sectional retrospective surveys or population-based descriptive studies. This systematic review showed that the pregnancy rate was estimated at 3.1%-48.5% among BC survivors who attempted to conceive. The most prevalent maternal outcomes of pregnancy were miscarriage (1.8%-33.3%) and induced abortion (5.0%-44%) as well as preterm birth (PTB) or very PTB (1.2%-21.1%), and twin birth (1.1%-38.8%) were the most prevalent neonatal outcomes occurring among BC survivors, respectively. In addition, most of the included studies indicated that pregnancy had no adverse effect on the status of BC recurrence among survivors. Surviving women can be encouraged and receive a carefully multidisciplinary approach regarding healthy pregnancy. No Patient or Public Contribution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marzieh Azizi
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & MidwiferyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Elham Ebrahimi
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & MidwiferyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Zahra Behboodi Moghadam
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, School of Nursing & MidwiferyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| | - Zohreh Shahhosseini
- Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Sexual and Reproductive Health Research CenterMazandaran University of Medical SciencesSariIran
| | - Maryam Modarres
- Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Researcher of Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing & MidwiferyTehran University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Favero D, Lapuchesky LS, Poggio F, Nardin S, Perachino M, Arecco L, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Latocca MM, Borea R, Puglisi S, Cosso M, Fozza A, Spinaci S, Lambertini M. Choosing the appropriate pharmacotherapy for breast cancer during pregnancy: what needs to be considered? Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1975-1984. [PMID: 38179613 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2293167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy during pregnancy. Breast cancer during pregnancy is a challenging clinical condition requiring proper and timely multidisciplinary management. AREAS COVERED This review focuses on the management of breast cancer during pregnancy with a focus about the current state-of-the-art on the feasibility and safety of pharmacotherapy approaches in this setting. EXPERT OPINION Multidisciplinary care is key for a proper diagnostic-therapeutic management of breast cancer during pregnancy. Engaging patients and their caregivers in the decision-making process is essential and psychological support should be provided. The treatment of patients with breast cancer during pregnancy should follow the same recommendations as those for breast cancer in young women outside pregnancy but taking into account the gestational age at the time of treatment.Anthracycline-, cyclophosphamide-, and taxane-based regimens can be safely administered during the second and third trimesters with standard protocols, preferring weekly regimens whenever possible. Endocrine therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted agents are contraindicated throughout pregnancy, also due to the very limited data available to guide their administration in this setting. During treatment, careful fetal growth monitoring is mandatory, and even after delivery proper health monitoring for the children exposed in utero to chemotherapy should be continued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diletta Favero
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Laura Sabina Lapuchesky
- Department of Medical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Simone Nardin
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Roberto Borea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cosso
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandra Fozza
- Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genoa, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (Di.M.I.), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lewinsohn R, Zheng Y, Rosenberg SM, Ruddy KJ, Tamimi RM, Schapira L, Peppercorn J, Borges VF, Come S, Snow C, Ginsburg ES, Partridge AH. Fertility Preferences and Practices Among Young Women With Breast Cancer: Germline Genetic Carriers Versus Noncarriers. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:317-323. [PMID: 36628811 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Young women with breast cancer who carry germline genetic pathogenic variants may face distinct fertility concerns, yet limited data exist comparing fertility preferences and practices between carriers and noncarriers. PATIENTS AND METHODS Participants in the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study (NCT01468246), a prospective cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at ≤40 years, who completed a modified Fertility Issues Survey were included in this analysis. RESULTS Of 1052 eligible participants, 118 (11%) tested positive for a pathogenic variant. Similar proportions (P = .23) of carriers (46%, [54/118]) and noncarriers (37%, [346/934]) desired more biologic children prediagnosis, and desire decreased similarly postdiagnosis (carriers, 30% [35/118] vs. noncarriers, 26% [244/934], P = .35). Among those desiring children postdiagnosis (n = 279), concern about cancer risk heritability was more common among carriers (74% [26/35] vs. noncarriers, 36% [88/244], P < .01). Carriers were more likely to report that concern about cancer risk heritability contributed to a lack of certainty or interest in future pregnancies (20% [16/81] vs. noncarriers, 7% [49/674], P = .001). Similar proportions (P = .65) of carriers (36% [43/118]) and noncarriers (38% [351/934]) were somewhat or very concerned about infertility post-treatment; utilization of fertility preservation strategies was also similar (carriers, 14% [17/118] vs. noncarriers, 12% [113/934], P = .78). CONCLUSION Carriers were similarly concerned about future fertility and as likely to pursue fertility preservation as noncarriers. Concern about cancer risk heritability was more frequent among carriers and impacted decisions not to pursue future pregnancies for some, underscoring the importance of counseling regarding strategies to prevent transmission to offspring, including preimplantation genetic testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Lewinsohn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Yue Zheng
- Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | | | | | - Jeffrey Peppercorn
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Steven Come
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Craig Snow
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Breast Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Razeti MG, Soldato D, Arecco L, Levaggi A, Puglisi S, Solinas C, Agostinetto E, Spinaci S, Lapuchesky L, Genova C, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. Approaches to Fertility Preservation for Young Women With Breast Cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 2023; 23:241-248. [PMID: 36710145 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
In patients with early breast cancer, the combination of different systemic treatment strategies, including chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, targeted therapy, and more recently also immunotherapy has demonstrated to significantly improve their survival outcomes. However, this gain is often obtained at the cost of higher toxicity calling for the need of increased attention toward survivorship-related issues, including fertility preservation in young women. According to available guidelines, health care providers should offer oncofertility counseling to all patients with cancer diagnosed at reproductive age. Counselling should focus on the risk of gonadotoxicity of anticancer treatments and on the access to fertility preservation techniques. However, several surveys have demonstrated suboptimal implementation of these recommendations. This review aims at summarizing the available evidence on oncofertility to guide health care providers involved in the management of young women with breast cancer. Available and effective options for fertility preservation include oocyte/embryo cryopreservation or ovarian tissue cryopreservation. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics should be carefully considered when offering these strategies. Ovarian function preservation with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists during chemotherapy should be discussed and offered to every premenopausal woman concerned about developing premature ovarian insufficiency and independently of her wish to preserve fertility. Current available data confirm that pregnancy occurring after proper treatment for breast cancer is safe, both in terms of long-term clinical outcomes and for the babies. Fertility preservation and pregnancy desire should be pivotal components of the multimodal management of breast cancer in young women, and require a multidisciplinary approach based on close collaborations between oncologists and fertility specialists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria G Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Davide Soldato
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessia Levaggi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Medical Oncology, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Elisa Agostinetto
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B.), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Laura Lapuchesky
- Medical Oncology, Instituto Alexander Fleming, Ciudad Autónoma De Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carlo Genova
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopatology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal-Child Health (DiNOGMI Department), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sonigo C, Amsellem N, Mayeur A, Laup L, Pistilli B, Delaloge S, Eustache F, Sifer C, Rakrouki S, Benoit A, Peigné M, Grynberg M. Disease-free survival does not differ according to fertility preservation technique for young women with breast cancer. Fertil Steril 2023; 119:465-473. [PMID: 36473609 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.11.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To study whether fertility preservation strategies using ovarian stimulation or without using it impact long-term disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer. DESIGN Retrospective bicentric cohort study. SETTING Two university hospitals. PATIENT(S) In this study, 740 women with breast cancer, aged 18-43 years, who received primary fertility preservation between 2013 and 2019 after a diagnosis of localized breast cancer were included. INTERVENTION(S) Overall, 328 patients underwent at least 1 ovarian stimulation cycle (STIM group) and 412 had a technique without hormonal administration (no STIM group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Disease-free survival and overall survival up to May 2021 were compared between the 2 groups by log-rank test. Cox proportional-hazard regression model was used for multivariable analyses. RESULT(S) Out of the 740 women who underwent fertility preservation, follow-up data were available for 269 women in the STIM group (82%) and 330 (80%) in the no STIM group. Kaplan-Meier estimates of disease-free survival at 4 years were 87.9% (82.8%-92.2%) and 83.1% (78.4%-87.3%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. After adjustment on prognostic parameters, no significant difference in breast cancer recurrence rate was observed between the STIM and no STIM groups (hazard ratios, 0.83 [0.64-1.08]). Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival at 4 years was 97.6% (95.3%-99.2%) and 93.6% (90.9%-95.9%) in the STIM and no STIM groups, respectively. Overall survival was higher in the STIM group than no STIM group (log-rank test). After adjustment on prognostic parameters, the risk of death remained significantly lower in the STIM group (Hazard Ratio, 0.55 [0.35-0.85]). CONCLUSION(S) In our cohort, STIM for fertility preservation in breast cancer did not significantly impact disease-free survival but was associated with higher overall survival. The disease-free survival and overall survival of young patients with breast cancer were not impacted by fertility preservation techniques irrespective of the timing of chemotherapy (neoadjuvant or adjuvant) and the use of ovarian stimulation. Nevertheless, because death and recurrence were rare events, these results should be taken with caution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Sonigo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France; Universite Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Physiologie et physiopathologie endocrinienne, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France.
| | - Noémi Amsellem
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Anne Mayeur
- Histology-Embryology-Cytogenetic Laboratory, Universite Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Laetitia Laup
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Suzette Delaloge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Florence Eustache
- Department of Biology of Reproduction and CECOS, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Christophe Sifer
- Department of Biology of Reproduction and CECOS, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Sophia Rakrouki
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Alexandra Benoit
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France
| | - Maeliss Peigné
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| | - Michael Grynberg
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Paris-Saclay, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Antoine Beclere Hospital, Clamart, France; Department of Reproductive Medicine and Fertility Preservation, Universite Sorbonne Paris Nord, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris, Jean Verdier Hospital, Bondy, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lambertini M, Ceppi M, Anderson RA, Cameron DA, Bruzzone M, Franzoi MA, Massarotti C, El-Abed S, Wang Y, Lecocq C, Nuciforo P, Rolyance R, Pusztai L, Sohn J, Latocca MM, Arecco L, Pistilli B, Ruddy KJ, Ballestrero A, Del Mastro L, Peccatori FA, Partridge AH, Saura C, Untch M, Piccart M, Di Cosimo S, de Azambuja E, Demeestere I. Impact of Anti-HER2 Therapy Alone and With Weekly Paclitaxel on the Ovarian Reserve of Young Women With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:33-41.e16. [PMID: 36634607 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.7065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential gonadotoxicity of anti-HER2 agents remains largely unknown, and limited, conflicting evidence exists for taxanes. Antimüllerian hormone (AMH) is an established biomarker of ovarian reserve that may aid in quantifying anticancer treatment-induced gonadotoxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS The present biomarker analysis of the randomized phase III neoadjuvant NeoALTTO trial included premenopausal women aged ≤45 years at diagnosis of HER2-positive early breast cancer with available frozen serum samples at baseline (ie, before anticancer treatments), at week 2 (ie, the "biological window" of anti-HER2 therapy alone), and/or at the time of surgery (ie, after completing paclitaxel + anti-HER2 therapy, before starting adjuvant chemotherapy). RESULTS The present analysis included 130 patients with a median age of 38 years (interquartile ratio [IQR], age 33-42 years). AMH values at the 3 time points differed significantly (P<.001). At baseline, median AMH levels were 1.29 ng/mL (IQR, 0.56-2.62 ng/mL). At week 2, a small but significant reduction in AMH levels was observed (median, 1.10 ng/mL; IQR, 0.45-2.09 ng/mL; P<.001). At surgery, a larger significant decline in AMH levels was observed (median, 0.01 ng/mL; IQR, 0.01-0.03 ng/mL; P<.001). Although the type of anti-HER2 treatment (trastuzumab and/or lapatinib) did not seem to impact the results, age and pretreatment ovarian reserve had a major influence on treatment-induced gonadotoxicity risk. CONCLUSIONS This NeoALTTO biomarker analysis showed that anti-HER2 therapies alone had limited gonadotoxicity but that the addition of weekly paclitaxel resulted in marked AMH decline with possible negative implications for subsequent ovarian function and fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - David A Cameron
- Institute of Genomics and Cancer, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Claudia Massarotti
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Paolo Nuciforo
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, SOLTI BC Cooperative Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Joohyuk Sohn
- Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | - Alberto Ballestrero
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Ann H Partridge
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Cristina Saura
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology, SOLTI BC Cooperative Group, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Martine Piccart
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dolmans MM, Demeestere I, Anckaert E, De Vos M. Proceedings of the Oncofertility Congress of the "Freezing Ovarian Tissue and Oocytes" (FOTO) Consortium Brussels. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:1715-1725. [PMID: 35751830 PMCID: PMC9428079 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02552-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
- Gynecology Department, Cliniques Universitaires St-Luc, Avenue Hippocrate 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
- Gynecology Research Laboratory, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale Et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Mounier 52, bte B1.52.02, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Research Laboratory On Human Reproduction, Fertility Clinic, CUB-Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ellen Anckaert
- Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel De Vos
- Follicle Biology Laboratory, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
- Brussels IVF, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khan SZ, Arecco L, Villarreal-Garza C, Sirohi B, Ponde NF, Habeeb B, Brandão M, Azim HA, Chowdhury AR, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Kovalenko I, Odhiambo A, Seid FU, Mutombo AB, Petracci F, Vidra R, Altuna SC, Petrova M, Kourie HR, Ozturk MA, Razeti MG, Lengyel CG, Talibova N, Mariamidze E, Sacardo KP, Duma N, Gyawali B, Trapani D, Tagliamento M, Lambertini M. Knowledge, Practice, and Attitudes of Physicians in Low- and Middle-Income Countries on Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young Women With Breast Cancer. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2100153. [PMID: 35025688 PMCID: PMC8769103 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility and pregnancy-related issues are highly relevant for young (≤ 40 years) patients with breast cancer. Limited evidence exists on knowledge, practice, and attitudes of physicians from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) regarding these issues. Online in @ASCO_pubs #JCOGlobOncol large survey by @matteolambe et al. showing suboptimal practice and attitudes of physicians in #LMICs on #fertility and #pregnancy issues in young #BreastCancer patients: increased awareness and education in #oncofertility are needed@OncoAlert![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shah Zeb Khan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, BINOR, Bannu, Pakistan
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Baker Habeeb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaqlawa Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Mariana Brandão
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Arman Reza Chowdhury
- Department of Oncology, Evercare Cancer Centre, Evercare Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Andrew Odhiambo
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Fahmi Usman Seid
- Department of Oncology, Hawassa University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia.,Department of Oncology, Tikur Anbessa Hospital College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Radu Vidra
- Oncology Department, The Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof Dr Octavian Fodor," Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Oncology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Mila Petrova
- MHAT Nadezhda Department of Medical Oncology, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mehmet Akif Ozturk
- Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Narmin Talibova
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Oncology Center, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Elene Mariamidze
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Narjust Duma
- The Cancer Care Equity Program, Lowe Center For Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tanda ET, Croce E, Spagnolo F, Zullo L, Spinaci S, Genova C, Rossi G. Immunotherapy in Adolescents and Young Adults: What Remains in Cancer Survivors? Front Oncol 2021; 11:736123. [PMID: 34631569 PMCID: PMC8495150 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.736123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunotherapy has changed the landscape of treatments for advanced disease in multiple neoplasms. More and more patients are long survivors from a metastatic disease. Most recently, the extension of indications and evidence of efficacy in early disease settings, such as the adjuvant and neoadjuvant setting in breast cancer, lung cancer, glioma, and gastric cancer, places more attention on what happens to patients who survive cancer. In particular, we evaluated what happens in young patients, a population in whom some immune-related effects are still poorly described. Immunotherapy is already a reality in early disease settings and the scientific community is lagging in describing what to expect in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients. For instance, the impact of these therapies on female and male fertility is not clear, similarly to the interaction that may occur between these drugs and pregnancy. This review aims to highlight these little-known topics that are difficult to evaluate in ad hoc studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Teresa Tanda
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy.,Genetics of Rare Cancers, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Croce
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesco Spagnolo
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Lodovica Zullo
- Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Ospedale Policlinico San Martino-Oncologia Medica 2, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi, Genova, Italy
| | - Carlo Genova
- UO Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Giovanni Rossi
- Medical Oncology Department, Ospedale Padre Antero Micone, Genoa, Italy.,Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Bruzzone M, Perachino M, Anderson RA, de Azambuja E, Poorvu PD, Kim HJ, Villarreal-Garza C, Pistilli B, Vaz-Luis I, Saura C, Ruddy KJ, Franzoi MA, Sertoli C, Ceppi M, Azim HA, Amant F, Demeestere I, Del Mastro L, Partridge AH, Pagani O, Peccatori FA. Pregnancy After Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:3293-3305. [PMID: 34197218 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients and physicians remain concerned about the potential detrimental effects of pregnancy after breast cancer (BC) in terms of reproductive outcomes and maternal safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at providing updated evidence on these topics. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted to identify studies including patients with a pregnancy after BC (PROSPERO number CRD42020158324). Likelihood of pregnancy after BC, their reproductive outcomes, and maternal safety were assessed. Pooled relative risks, odds ratios (ORs), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were calculated using random effects models. RESULTS Of 6,462 identified records, 39 were included involving 8,093,401 women from the general population and 112,840 patients with BC of whom 7,505 had a pregnancy after diagnosis. BC survivors were significantly less likely to have a subsequent pregnancy compared with the general population (relative risk, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.49). Risks of caesarean section (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.25), low birth weight (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.73), preterm birth (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.88), and small for gestational age (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.33) were significantly higher in BC survivors, particularly in those with previous chemotherapy exposure, compared with the general population. No significantly increased risk of congenital abnormalities or other reproductive complications were observed. Compared to patients with BC without subsequent pregnancy, those with a pregnancy had better disease-free survival (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.89) and overall survival (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.68). Similar results were observed after correcting for potential confounders and irrespective of patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, pregnancy outcome, and timing of pregnancy. CONCLUSION These results provide reassuring evidence on the safety of conceiving in BC survivors. Patients' pregnancy desire should be considered a crucial component of their survivorship care plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Bruzzone
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Department of Medicine, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philip D Poorvu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.,Department of Breast Tumors, Instituo Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Barbara Pistilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Ines Vaz-Luis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cristina Saura
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital (HUVH), Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Chiara Sertoli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marcello Ceppi
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Frederic Amant
- Netherlands Cancer Institute and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Demeestere
- Fertility Clinic, CUB-Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Ann H Partridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston MA
| | - Olivia Pagani
- Geneva University Hospitals, European School of Oncology, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Fedro A Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Department, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Conception after chemotherapy: post-chemotherapy method of conception and pregnancy outcomes in breast cancer patients. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1755-1765. [PMID: 33740176 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02133-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE As the paradigm shifts towards improving cancer survivorship, an important concern for reproductive-aged women diagnosed with cancer is how their disease and its treatment will affect their future fertility. We sought to characterize pregnancy attempts and outcomes in breast cancer patients following chemotherapy. METHODS We conducted a prospective cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer seen between 2010 and 2019. A questionnaire was administered following cancer treatment with questions regarding oncologic and reproductive history and attempts and method of conception. RESULTS Of 181 participants, 46 (25.4%) attempted to conceive following chemotherapy. Thirty-five patients (76.1%) had return of ovarian function. Of those, 34 patients (mean age 32.8 years) first attempted to conceive by intercourse, and 22 (64.7%) became pregnant, resulting in 17 live births. Of the remaining 12 who did not successfully conceive through intercourse, eight went on to try other methods, resulting in five additional pregnancies and one live birth. Twelve patients (mean age 34.6 years) proceeded directly to ART; of those, eight (66.7%) became pregnant, resulting in six live births. CONCLUSION In breast cancer patients with return of ovarian function after chemotherapy, half were able to conceive by intercourse alone. In order to maximize reproductive potential in patients who have return of ovarian function, providers should offer natural conception as a reasonable option prior to the use of cryopreserved tissue. For those who did not attempt to conceive on their own, the use of pre-treatment cryopreserved eggs or embryos had a high likelihood of success.
Collapse
|
18
|
Time to Pregnancy, Obstetrical and Neonatal Outcomes after Breast Cancer: A Study from the Maternity Network for Young Breast Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13051070. [PMID: 33802333 PMCID: PMC7959151 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13051070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 02/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Although an increasing number of young breast cancer (BC) patients have a pregnancy desire after BC, the time necessary to obtain a pregnancy after treatment and subsequent outcomes remain unknown. We aimed to determine the time to evolutive pregnancy in a cohort of BC survivors and subsequent obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. We analyzed BC patients treated at Institut Curie from 2005-2017, aged 18-43 years old (y.o.) at diagnosis having at least one subsequent pregnancy. 133 patients were included, representing 197 pregnancies. Mean age at BC diagnosis was 32.8 y.o. and at pregnancy beginning was 36.8 y.o. 71% pregnancies were planned, 18% unplanned and 86% spontaneous. 64% pregnancies resulted in live birth (n = 131). Median time from BC diagnosis to pregnancy beginning was 48 months and was significantly associated with endocrine therapy (p < 0.001). Median time to pregnancy was 4.3 months. Median time to evolutive pregnancy 5.6 months. In multivariate analysis, menstrual cycles before pregnancy remained significantly associated with time to pregnancy and endocrine therapy with time evolutive to pregnancy. None of the BC treatments (chemotherapy/endocrine therapy/trastuzumab) was significantly associated with obstetrical nor neonatal outcomes, that seemed comparable to global population. Our findings provide reassuring data for pregnancy counseling both in terms of delay and outcome.
Collapse
|