Axons added to the regenerated visual pathway of goldfish establish a normal fiber topography along the age-axis

Regenerating optic axons restore topography after incomplete optic nerve injury

Following complete optic nerve injury in a lizard, Ctenophorus ornatus, retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons regenerate but fail to restore retinotectal topography unless animals are trained on a visual task (Beazley et al. [ 1997] J Comp Neurol 370:105-120, [2003] J Neurotrauma 20:1263-1270). Here we show that incomplete injury, which leaves some RGC axons intact, restores normal topography. Strict RGC axon topography allowed us to preserve RGC axons on one side of the nerve (projecting to medial tectum) while lesioning those on the other side (projecting to lateral tectum). Topography and response properties for both RGC axon populations were assessed electrophysiologically. The majority of intact RGC axons retained appropriate topography in medial tectum and had normal, consistently brisk, reliable responses. Regenerate RGC axons fell into two classes: those that projected topographically to lateral tectum with responses that tended to habituate and those that lacked topography, responded weakly, and habituated rapidly. Axon tracing by localized retinal application of carbocyanine dyes supported the electrophysiological data. RGC soma counts were normal in both intact and axotomized RGC populations, contrasting with the 30% RGC loss after complete injury. Unlike incomplete optic nerve injury in mammals, where RGC axon regeneration fails and secondary cell death removes many intact RGC somata, lizards experience a "win-win" situation: intact RGC axons favorably influence the functional outcome for regenerating ones and RGCs do not succumb to either primary or secondary cell death.

Differential tissue distribution, developmental programming, estrogen regulation and promoter characteristics of cyp19 genes in teleost fish

Teleost fish are characterized by exceptionally high levels of brain estrogen biosynthesis when compared to the brains of other vertebrates or to the ovaries of the same fish. Goldfish (Carassius auratus) and zebrafish (Danio rerio) have utility as complementary models for understanding the molecular basis and functional significance of exaggerated neural estrogen biosynthesis. Multiple cytochrome P450 aromatase (P450arom) cDNAs that derive from separate gene loci (cyp19a and cyp19b) are differentially expressed in brain (P450aromB>>A) and ovary (P450aromA>>B) and have a different developmental program (B>>A) and response to estrogen upregulation (B only). As measured by increased P450aromB mRNA, a functional estrogen response system is first detected 24-48 h post-fertilization (hpf), consistent with the onset of estrogen receptor (ER) expression (alpha, beta, and gamma). The 5'-flanking region of the cyp19b gene has a TATA box, two estrogen response elements (EREs), an ERE half-site (ERE1/2), a nerve growth factor inducible-B protein (NGFI-B)/Nur77 responsive element (NBRE) binding site, and a sequence identical to the zebrafish GATA-2 gene neural specific enhancer. The cyp19a promoter region has TATA and CAAT boxes, a steroidogenic factor-1 (SF-1) binding site, and two aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR)/AhR nuclear translocator factor (ARNT) binding motifs. Both genes have multiple potential SRY/SOX binding sites (16 and 8 in cyp19b and cyp19a, respectively). Luciferase reporters have basal promoter activity in GH3 cells, but differences (a>>b) are opposite to fish pituitary (b>>a). When microinjected into fertilized zebrafish eggs, a cyp19b promoter-driven green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter (but not cyp19a) is expressed in neurons of 30-48 hpf embryos, most prominently in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and their projections to optic tectum. Further studies are required to identify functionally relevant cis-elements and cellular factors, and to determine the regulatory role of estrogen in neurodevelopment.

Gefiltin in zebrafish embryos: sequential gene expression of two neurofilament proteins in retinal ganglion cells

Neurogenesis is correlated with the progressive synthesis of diverse neuronal intermediate filaments (IF) proteins. This apparent developmental regulation of IF protein gene expression suggests that specific neurofilament proteins impart unique structural attributes that support the staged growth of the neuron. In the teleost visual pathway, the sequential expression of two IF genes, plasticin and gefiltin, is linked to the age of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) and to the regeneration of optic axons after nerve injury. Given this pattern of plasticin and gefiltin expression, we hypothesized that the two proteins would be sequentially expressed in zebrafish retina during development. We analyzed the pattern of gefiltin expression during zebrafish development and compared it to our previous determination of plasticin expression (Canger et al. 1998). Gefiltin is expressed after plasticin, during the later stages of retinal development when axons grow past the optic chiasm and innervate their targets. Thus, during RGC development, expression of plasticin and gefiltin resembles that with optic nerve regeneration. Outside of the visual pathway, gefiltin is predominantly expressed in the central nervous system whereas plasticin is primarily expressed in the peripheral nervous system. These results suggest that the expression of these genes is regulated in a neuron-specific manner. In addition, since plasticin and gefiltin are co-expressed during RGC development, these findings suggest a more complex mechanism of transcriptional regulation which orchestrates the sequential expression of these genes.

Evidence for a driving role of ingrowing axons for the shifting of older retinal terminals in the tectum of fish

In amphibians and teleosts, retina and tectum grow incongruently. In order to maintain the retinotopy of the retinotectal projection, Gaze, Keating, and Chung (1974) postulated a shifting of terminals throughout growth. In order to test the possibility that ingrowing retinal fibers are the driving force for this shifting, we induced a permanent retinal projection into the ipsilateral tectum in juveniles of the cichlid fish Haplochromis burtoni. The surface of the tectum had increased (11-18 months later) 2.5-5.8 times, and the surface of the retina 8.6-14 times. Filling of ganglion cells with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) retrogradely from the tectum showed ipsilaterally regenerating ganglion cells only in the center of the retina. The position of ganglion cells indicated that the ipsilateral projection derived only from axotomized and regenerating retinal ganglion cells but not from those newly born. Ipsilaterally projecting retinal fibers showed terminals only in the rostral half of the tectum. Comparison of area of terminations of ipsilaterally projecting ganglion cells at various times after the crush provided no evidence for expansion or a shift into caudal tectal areas throughout the period of growth. These findings are compatible with the idea that newly ingrowing fibers induce older terminals to move caudally.

Topographic disorganization of the optic tracts following long-term optic nerve regeneration: a quantitative image analysis study

Experiments were designed to find the degree to which regenerated optic axons occupied their previous locations in the optic tracts. Following optic nerve crush and regeneration, either the dorsal, ventral, peripheral, temporal, or nasal part of the retina was ablated. The axons of the remaining retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) were labeled with cobalt. Density of the regenerated dorsal and ventral axons in the dorsal vs. ventral optic tracts was determined digitally. In addition, we determined the density of temporal and nasal axons in the temporal vs. nasal compartments of each optic tract and the density of central axons in the central vs. peripheral compartments of both optic tracts. Regenerated axons were not distributed randomly in the optic tracts. Instead, they were slightly but, significantly biased toward growing through the tract or compartment that they had occupied previously. Still, the pathway specificity exhibited by the regenerated axons was closer to random than it was to the pathway specificity seen in normal animals. Dorsal, ventral, and central RGC axons were significantly better localized to their correct tract or compartment than were temporal or nasal RGC axons. Also, over time, dorsal and ventral axons tended to disappear from incorrectly chosen optic tracts. The slight bias toward choosing the appropriate optic tract or optic tract compartment may be enough to account for the topographic specificity of the regenerated retinotectal projection. Near-randomness of the axonal positions in the tracts argues against the presence of any specific guidance cues in the optic tracts of adult animals. Axonal density was highest in the correct compartment and diminished progressively with increasing distance into the incorrect compartment. Such a gradient of axonal density suggests that regenerating axons "drift" away from their previous positions in the optic pathways.

Axonal pathfinding during the regeneration of the goldfish optic pathway

Retinal ganglion cells in fish and amphibians regenerate their axons after transection of the optic nerve. Fiber tracing studies during the third month of regeneration show that the axons have reestablished a basically normal fiber order in the two brachia of the optic tract; axons originating in the ventral hemiretina are concentrated in the dorsal brachium, axons from the dorsal hemiretina in the ventral brachium. Attardi and Sperry (Exp. Neurol. 7:46-64, 1963) first suggested that the reestablishment of the fiber order reflects path-finding by the regenerating axons. Recently, however, Becker and Cook (Development 101:323-337, 1987) have claimed that the fiber order observed at later stages of regeneration is due to secondary axonal rearrangements and that the initial brachial choice is random. In order to evaluate whether regenerating axons are capable of navigating in the optic tract and brachia and on the tectum, the present study examined the pathway choices and the morphology of regenerating axons en route to their tectal targets in goldfish. Subsets of axons were labeled at various time intervals (2 to 30 days) following an optic nerve crush, by intraretinal application of the lipophilic fluorescent tracer 1,1-dioctadecyl-3-3-3'-3'-tetramethylcarbocyanine (DiI). After a survival time of 18 to 72 hours (to allow for diffusion of DiI along the axons), the experimental animals were perfused with fixative and their right and left optic pathways (nerve, tract, and tectum) were dissected free and separated at the chiasm. Fluorescently labeled axons were traced in whole-mounted pathways. Pathway choices were examined at the brachial bifurcation where axons from ventral and dorsal hemiretinae normally segregate. DiI was found to label axons reliably up to their growth cones, even at the earliest stages of regrowth. The pathway choices of the axons were nonrandom. The majority of the ventral axons reached the appropriate, dorsal hemitectum through the appropriate dorsal brachium of the tract. Dorsal axons reached the ventral hemitectum mainly through the ventral brachium. This suggests the presence of specific guidance cues, accessible to the regenerating axons. Differences in the complexity of the growth cones of the regenerating axons (simple in the nerve and tectal fiber layer, complex in the tract and the synaptic layer of the tectum) provide further evidence for specific interactions between the regenerating axons and their substrates along the pathway. These results argue that regenerating retinal axons in fish are capable of axonal path-finding.

Regenerated optic fibers in goldfish reestablish a crude sectoral order in the visual pathway

The goldfish optic pathway is regenerated after an optic nerve crush. We have examined the axonal topography of the regenerated pathway by labeling, with horseradish peroxidase (HRP), axons originating from retinal sectors or annuli. The positions of the labeled axons in the cross section of the pathway were compared to the normal and related to the factors that may influence axonal pathfinding. The positions of retinal axons in the cross section of the normal pathway are predictable from the retinal addresses of the ganglion cells described by the polar coordinates r (the distance from the optic disc) and theta (the sectoral or clockface position). The two coordinates map orthogonally onto the cross section of the pathway; r varies monotonically along one axis; theta varies along a perpendicular axis. The normal r-order, present in the nonregenerated stump of the experimental nerve, was severely degraded and perhaps lost entirely in the regenerated optic nerve, tract, and brachia. Sectoral order was also lost as the axons passed the crush site, but it was reestablished, albeit crudely, in the regenerated tract and brachia where axons tended to occupy positions appropriate to their dorsal, ventral, nasal, and temporal retinal origins. The exit sequence of the regenerated axons from the stratum opticum into the tectal neuropil was normal: temporal first, nasal last. These results suggest that the regenerating fibers followed some theta-specific cue located in the nonaxonal environment. It seems likely that the original axons probably followed the same cue. In contrast, the absence of r-order suggests that there is no r-specific cue for the regenerates to follow. It seems likely that the original r-order was a consequence of nonspecific influences--the orderly spatiotemporal growth of the retina and the existence of a permissive region for axonal growth.