Proctolin and excitation of the crayfish swimmeret system

Nitric oxide-mediated intersegmental modulation of cycle frequency in the crayfish swimmeret system

Crayfish swimmerets are paired appendages located on the ventral side of each abdominal segment that show rhythmic beating during forward swimming produced by central pattern generators in most abdominal segments. For animals with multiple body segments and limbs, intersegmental coordination of central pattern generators in each segment is crucial for the production of effective movements. Here we develop a novel pharmacological approach to analyse intersegmental modulation of swimmeret rhythm by selectively elevating nitric oxide levels and reducing them with pharmacological agents, in specific ganglia. Bath application of L-arginine, the substrate NO synthesis, increased the cyclical spike responses of the power-stroke motor neurons. By contrast the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME decreased them. To determine the role of the different local centres in producing and controlling the swimmeret rhythm, these two drugs were applied locally to two separate ganglia following bath application of carbachol. Results revealed that there was both ascending and descending intersegmental modulation of cycle frequency of the swimmeret rhythm in the abdominal ganglia and that synchrony of cyclical activity between segments of segments was maintained. We also found that there were gradients in the strength effectiveness in modulation, that ascending modulation of the swimmeret rhythm was stronger than descending modulation.

Summary: We develop a novel pharmacological approach using a nitric oxide donor and a nitric oxide synthase inhibitor to analyse modulation and segmental synchrony in the swimmeret rhythm of the crayfish.

A circuit mechanism for the propagation of waves of muscle contraction in Drosophila

Animals move by adaptively coordinating the sequential activation of muscles. The circuit mechanisms underlying coordinated locomotion are poorly understood. Here, we report on a novel circuit for the propagation of waves of muscle contraction, using the peristaltic locomotion of Drosophila larvae as a model system. We found an intersegmental chain of synaptically connected neurons, alternating excitatory and inhibitory, necessary for wave propagation and active in phase with the wave. The excitatory neurons (A27h) are premotor and necessary only for forward locomotion, and are modulated by stretch receptors and descending inputs. The inhibitory neurons (GDL) are necessary for both forward and backward locomotion, suggestive of different yet coupled central pattern generators, and its inhibition is necessary for wave propagation. The circuit structure and functional imaging indicated that the commands to contract one segment promote the relaxation of the next segment, revealing a mechanism for wave propagation in peristaltic locomotion.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13253.001

Rhythmic movements such as walking and swimming require the coordinated contraction of many different muscles. Throughout the animal kingdom, from insects to mammals, animals possess specialized circuits of neurons that are responsible for producing these patterns of muscle contraction. These circuits are known as ‘central pattern generators’.

Central pattern generators are made up of multiple types of neurons that exchange information. However, it is unclear how neurons controlling the movement of one part of the body relay information to neurons controlling the movement of other parts. To answer this question, Fushiki et al. used larvae from the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster as a model, and combined techniques such as electrophysiology and electron microscopy with measures of the insect’s behavior.

Fruit fly larvae have bodies that are made of segments, and they can contract and relax these segments in a sequence to propel themselves forwards or backwards. The contraction of one segment is accompanied by relaxation of the segment immediately in front. Fushiki et al. found that each body segment contains a copy of the same basic neuronal circuit. This circuit is made up of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. Both types of neurons regulate movement, but the inhibitory neurons must be suppressed for movement to occur.

The experiments also showed that each circuit receives both long-range input from the brain and local sensory feedback. This combination of inputs ensures that the segments contract and relax in the correct order. Future challenges are to determine how the brain controls larval movement via its long-range projections to the body. A key step will be to map these circuits at the level of the individual neurons and the connections between them.

DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.13253.002

Proprioceptive feedback modulates coordinating information in a system of segmentally distributed microcircuits

The system of modular neural circuits that controls crustacean swimmerets drives a metachronal sequence of power-stroke (PS, retraction) and return-stroke (RS, protraction) movements that propels the animal forward efficiently. These neural modules are synchronized by an intersegmental coordinating circuit that imposes characteristic phase differences between these modules. Using a semi-intact preparation that left one swimmeret attached to an otherwise isolated central nervous system (CNS) of the crayfish, Pacifastacus leniusculus, we investigated how the rhythmic activity of this system responded to imposed movements. We recorded extracellularly from the PS and RS nerves that innervated the attached limb and from coordinating axons that encode efference copies of the periodic bursts in PS and RS axons. Simultaneously, we recorded from homologous nerves in more anterior and posterior segments. Maintained retractions did not affect cycle period but promptly weakened PS bursts, strengthened RS bursts, and caused corresponding changes in the strength and timing of efference copies in the module's coordinating axons. Changes in these efference copies then caused changes in the phase and duration, but not the strength, of PS bursts in modules controlling neighboring swimmerets. These changes were promptly reversed when the limb was released. Each swimmeret is innervated by two nonspiking stretch receptors (NSSRs) that depolarize when the limb is retracted. Voltage clamp of an NSSR changed the durations and strengths of bursts in PS and RS axons innervating the same limb and caused corresponding changes in the efference copies of this motor output.

Neurobiology of the crustacean swimmeret system

The crustacean swimmeret system includes a distributed set of local circuits that individually control movements of one jointed limb. These modular local circuits occur in pairs in each segmental ganglion, and normally operate synchronously to produce smoothly coordinated cycles of limb movements on different body segments. The system presents exceptional opportunities for computational and experimental investigation of neural mechanisms of coordination because: (a) The system will express in vitro the periodic motor pattern that normally drives cycles of swimmeret movements during forward swimming. (b) The intersegmental neurons which encode information that is necessary and sufficient for normal coordination have been identified, and their activity can be recorded. (c) The local commissural neurons that integrate this coordinating information and tune the phase of each swimmeret are known. (d) The complete set of synaptic connections between coordinating neurons and these commissural neurons have been described. (e). The synaptic connections onto each local pattern-generating circuit through which coordinating information tunes the circuit's phase have been discovered. These factors make possible for the first time a detailed, comprehensive cellular and synaptic explanation of how this neural circuit produces an effective, behaviorally significant output. This paper is the first comprehensive review of the system's neuroanatomy and neurophysiology, its local and intersegmental circuitry, its transmitter pharmacology, its neuromodulatory control mechanisms, and its interactions with other motor systems. Each of these topics is covered in detail in an attempt to provide a complete review of the literature as a foundation for new research. The series of hypotheses that have been proposed to account for the system's properties are reviewed critically in the context of experimental tests of their validity.

Crustacean neuropeptides

Crustaceans have long been used for peptide research. For example, the process of neurosecretion was first formally demonstrated in the crustacean X-organ-sinus gland system, and the first fully characterized invertebrate neuropeptide was from a shrimp. Moreover, the crustacean stomatogastric and cardiac nervous systems have long served as models for understanding the general principles governing neural circuit functioning, including modulation by peptides. Here, we review the basic biology of crustacean neuropeptides, discuss methodologies currently driving their discovery, provide an overview of the known families, and summarize recent data on their control of physiology and behavior.

Fifty Years of CPGs: Two Neuroethological Papers that Shaped the Course of Neuroscience

Half a century ago, two independent papers that described unexpected results of experiments on locomotion in insects and crayfish appeared almost simultaneously. Together these papers demonstrated that an animal's central nervous system (CNS) was organized to produce behaviorally important motor output without the need for constant sensory feedback. These results contradicted the established line of thought that was based on interpretations of reflexes and ablation experiments, and established that in these animals the CNS contained neural circuits that could produce complex, periodic, multisegmental patterns of activity. These papers stimulated a flowering of research on central pattern-generating mechanisms that displaced reflex-based thinking everywhere except in medical physiology texts. Here we review these papers and their influence on thinking in the 1960s, 1970s, and today. We follow the development of ideas about central organization and control of expression of motor patterns, the roles of sensory input to central pattern-generating circuits, and integration of continuous sensory signals into a periodic motor system. We also review recent work on limb coordination that provides detailed cellular explanations of observations and speculations contained in those original papers.

State-changes in the swimmeret system: a neural circuit that drives locomotion

The crayfish swimmeret system undergoes transitions between a silent state and an active state. In the silent state, no patterned firing occurs in swimmeret motor neurons. In the active state, bursts of spikes in power stroke motor neurons alternate periodically with bursts of spikes in return stroke motor neurons. In preparations of the isolated crayfish central nervous system (CNS), the temporal structures of motor patterns expressed in the active state are similar to those expressed by the intact animal. These transitions can occur spontaneously, in response to stimulation of command neurons, or in response to application of neuromodulators and transmitter analogues. We used single-electrode voltage clamp of power-stroke exciter and return-stroke exciter motor neurons to study changes in membrane currents during spontaneous transitions and during transitions caused by bath-application of carbachol or octopamine (OA). Spontaneous transitions from silence to activity were marked by the appearance of a standing inward current and periodic outward currents in both types of motor neurons. Bath-application of carbachol also led to the development of these currents and activation of the system. Using low Ca(2+)-high Mg(2+) saline to block synaptic transmission, we found that the carbachol-induced inward current included a direct response by the motor neuron and an indirect component. Spontaneous transitions from activity to silence were marked by disappearance of the standing inward current and the periodic outward currents. Bath-application of OA led promptly to the disappearance of both currents, and silenced the system. OA also acted directly on both types of motor neurons to cause a hyperpolarizing outward current that would contribute to silencing the system.

Not by spikes alone: responses of coordinating neurons and the swimmeret system to local differences in excitation

Swimmeret coordinating neurons in the crayfish CNS collectively encode a detailed cycle-by-cycle report on features of the motor output to each swimmeret. This information coordinates the motor output that drives swimmeret movements. To see how coordinating neurons responded to forced changes in intersegmental phase, we used a split-bath, repeated-measures experimental design to expose different regions of isolated abdominal nerve cords to different levels of excitation. We present a quantitative description of the firing of power-stroke (PS) motor units and two kinds of coordinating interneurons, ASC(E) and DSC, recorded simultaneously from each swimmeret ganglion under uniform and nonuniform excitation. When anterior and posterior ganglia were excited differently, several parameters of the swimmeret motor pattern were affected. Strengths of PS bursts in each ganglion were determined by local excitation. The phase of PS bursts in neighboring ganglia changed at the excitation boundary. Coordinating neurons from the two ganglia closest to the excitation boundary were most affected by nonuniform excitation. ASC(E) neurons tracked the timing and duration of each PS burst in their home ganglion, but did not follow changes in PS burst strength. DSC neurons changed the duration, phase, and number of spikes per burst. We propose two models to explain these results. First, the period expressed under nonuniform conditions is the sum of local intersegmental latencies and these latencies are determined by local excitation. Second, the phase change at the excitation boundary is determined by local modulation of the targets of the intersegmental coordinating neurons, not by modulation of the coordinating neurons themselves.

Identification of a proctolin preprohormone gene (Proct) ofDrosophila melanogaster: Expression and predicted prohormone processing

Proctolin was the first insect neuropeptide to be sequenced and has been the subject of many physiological and pharmacological studies in insects and crustaceans. We have identified a Drosophila gene (CG7105, Proct) encoding a precursor protein containing the neuropeptide proctolin (RYLPT). In situ hybridization with a riboprobe to the Proct gene revealed a distribution of transcript in neurons of the larval central nervous system (CNS) matching that seen with antiserum to proctolin. An antiserum raised to a sequence in the precursor downstream of proctolin labeled the same neurons as those seen with the antiproctolin antisera. The predicted protein encoded by Proct has a single copy of the RYLPT sequence that directly follows the predicted signal peptidase cleavage point and precedes a consensus recognition site for a furinlike processing endoprotease. Ectopic expression of Proct in the CNS and midgut via the GAL4-UAS system, using an Actin5C-GAL4 driver, confirmed that the predicted preproproctolin can be processed to generate immunoreactive proctolin peptide. Pupae over-expressing Proct displayed a 14% increase in heart rate, providing evidence in support of a cardioacceleratory endocrine function for proctolin in Drosophila. The distribution of proctolin suggests roles as a neuromodulator in motoneurons and interneurons, and as a neurohormone that could be released from brain neurosecretory cells with terminations in the ring gland.

Local commissural interneurons integrate information from intersegmental coordinating interneurons

The information that coordinates movements of swimmerets on different segments of the crayfish abdomen is conducted by interneurons that originate in each abdominal ganglion. These interneurons project axons to neighboring ganglia and beyond. To discover the anatomy of these axons in their target ganglia, we used Neurobiotin and dextran-Texas Red microelectrodes to fill them near their targets. Coordinating axons coursed through these target ganglia close to the midline and extended only a few short branches that did not approach the lateral neuropils. Two of the three types of coordinating axons made direct synaptic connections with a class of local commissural interneurons that relayed the information to targets in the swimmeret pattern-generating circuits. These commissural interneurons, named here ComInt 1 neurons, followed a particular route to cross the midline and reach their targets. ComInt 1 neurons were nonspiking; they received EPSPs from the coordinating axons near the midline and transmitted this information to their targets in the lateral neuropils using graded transmission. The output of each ComInt 1 was restricted to a single local circuit and had opposite effects on the power-stroke and return-stroke motor neurons driven by that circuit. ComInt 1 neurons were direct postsynaptic targets of both descending and ascending coordinating axons that originated in other anterior and posterior ganglia. Because of phase differences in the impulses in these different coordinating axons, their signals arrived simultaneously at each ComInt 1. We discuss these findings in the context of alternative models of the intersegmental coordinating circuit.

Neuromodulatory complement of the pericardial organs in the embryonic lobster, Homarus americanus

The pericardial organs (POs) are a pair of neurosecretory organs that surround the crustacean heart and release neuromodulators into the hemolymph. In adult crustaceans, the POs are known to contain a wide array of peptide and amine modulators. However, little is known about the modulatory content of POs early in development. We characterize the morphology and modulatory content of pericardial organs in the embryonic lobster, Homarus americanus. The POs are well developed by midway through embryonic (E50) life and contain a wide array of neuromodulatory substances. Immunoreactivities to orcokinin, extended FLRFamide peptides, tyrosine hydroxylase, proctolin, allatostatin, serotonin, Cancer borealis tachykinin-related peptide, cholecystokinin, and crustacean cardioactive peptide are present in the POs by approximately midway through embryonic life. There are two classes of projection patterns to the POs. Immunoreactivities to orcokinin, extended FLRFamide peptides, and tyrosine hydroxylase project solely from the subesophageal ganglion (SEG), whereas the remaining modulators project from the SEG as well as from the thoracic ganglia. Double-labeling experiments with a subset of modulators did not reveal any colocalized peptides in the POs. These results suggest that the POs could be a major source of neuromodulators early in development.

Neuropeptides in the nervous system of Drosophila and other insects: multiple roles as neuromodulators and neurohormones

Neuropeptides in insects act as neuromodulators in the central and peripheral nervous system and as regulatory hormones released into the circulation. The functional roles of insect neuropeptides encompass regulation of homeostasis, organization of behaviors, initiation and coordination of developmental processes and modulation of neuronal and muscular activity. With the completion of the sequencing of the Drosophila genome we have obtained a fairly good estimate of the total number of genes encoding neuropeptide precursors and thus the total number of neuropeptides in an insect. At present there are 23 identified genes that encode predicted neuropeptides and an additional seven encoding insulin-like peptides in Drosophila. Since the number of G-protein-coupled neuropeptide receptors in Drosophila is estimated to be around 40, the total number of neuropeptide genes in this insect will probably not exceed three dozen. The neuropeptides can be grouped into families, and it is suggested here that related peptides encoded on a Drosophila gene constitute a family and that peptides from related genes (orthologs) in other species belong to the same family. Some peptides are encoded as multiple related isoforms on a precursor and it is possible that many of these isoforms are functionally redundant. The distribution and possible functions of members of the 23 neuropeptide families and the insulin-like peptides are discussed. It is clear that each of the distinct neuropeptides are present in specific small sets of neurons and/or neurosecretory cells and in some cases in cells of the intestine or certain peripheral sites. The distribution patterns vary extensively between types of neuropeptides. Another feature emerging for many insect neuropeptides is that they appear to be multifunctional. One and the same peptide may act both in the CNS and as a circulating hormone and play different functional roles at different central and peripheral targets. A neuropeptide can, for instance, act as a coreleased signal that modulates the action of a classical transmitter and the peptide action depends on the cotransmitter and the specific circuit where it is released. Some peptides, however, may work as molecular switches and trigger specific global responses at a given time. Drosophila, in spite of its small size, is now emerging as a very favorable organism for the studies of neuropeptide function due to the arsenal of molecular genetics methods available.

Local specification of relative strengths of synapses between different abdominal stretch-receptor axons and their common target neurons

Stretch-receptor (SR) axons form a parallel array of 20 excitatory synapses with target neurons in the crayfish CNS. In each postsynaptic neuron, EPSPs from different SR axons differ significantly in size. These amplitudes are correlated with the segment in which each axon originates and form a segmental gradient of synaptic excitation in individual postsynaptic neurons. These differences might arise postsynaptically because of differential postsynaptic attenuation or presynaptically because of local regulation of the strength of each synapse. To examine these possibilities, we stimulated each SR axon separately and studied integration of its EPSPs in an identified neuron, Flexor Inhibitor 6 (FI6). Transmission from SR axons to FI6 was chemical and direct: EPSPs were accompanied by an increased postsynaptic conductance, were affected by extracellular Ca(2+), and showed frequency-dependent depression. EPSPs from different SR axons summed linearly. The rise times of EPSPs from different SR axons were not significantly different. We also filled individual SR axons and FI6 neurons and mapped and counted their points of contact. Each SR axon contacted each FI6 bilaterally, and contacts of SR axons from different segments were intermingled on FI6. SR axons that made the strongest synapses made more points-of-contact with FI6. These results imply that differences in strength do not arise because of differential postsynaptic attenuation of EPSPs, but rather because certain SR axons predictably make more points of contact with FI6 than do others. Thus, this gradient in excitation requires that each synapse be regulated by an exchange between the SR axon and its target neuron.

Functional organization of crayfish abdominal ganglia. III. Swimmeret motor neurons

Swimmerets are limbs on several segments of the crayfish abdomen that are used for forward swimming and other behaviors. We present evidence that the functional modules demonstrated previously in physiological experiments are reflected in the morphological disposition of swimmeret motor neurons. The single nerve that innervates each swimmeret divides into two branches that separately contain the axons of power-stroke and return-stroke motor neurons. We used Co(++) or biocytin to backfill the entire pool of neurons that innervated a swimmeret, or functional subsets whose axons occurred in particular branches. Each filled cell body extended a single neurite that projected first to the Lateral Neuropil (LN), and there branched to form dendritic structures and its axon. All the motor neurons that innervated one swimmeret had cell bodies located in the ganglion from which their axons emerged, and the cell bodies of all but two of these neurons were located ipsilateral to their swimmeret. Counts of cell bodies filled from selected peripheral branches revealed about 35 power-stroke motor neurons and 35 return-stroke motor neurons. The cell bodies of these two types were segregated into different clusters within the ganglion, but both types sent their neurites into the ipsilateral LN and had their principle branches in this neuropil. We saw no significant differences in the numbers or distributions of these motor neurons in ganglia A2 through A5. These anatomical features are consistent with the physiological evidence that each swimmeret is controlled by its own neural module, which drives the alternating bursts of impulses in power-stroke and return-stroke motor neurons. We propose that the LN is the site of the synaptic circuit that generates this pattern.

Distinct functions for cotransmitters mediating motor pattern selection

Motor patterns are selected from multifunctional networks by selective activation of different projection neurons, many of which contain multiple transmitters. Little is known about how any individual projection neuron uses its cotransmitters to select a motor pattern. We address this issue by using the stomatogastric ganglion (STG) of the crab Cancer borealis, which contains a neuronal network that generates multiple versions of the pyloric and gastric mill motor patterns. The functional flexibility of this network results mainly from modulatory inputs it receives from projection neurons that originate in neighboring ganglia. We demonstrated previously that the STG motor pattern selected by activation of the modulatory proctolin neuron (MPN) results from direct MPN modulation of the pyloric rhythm and indirect MPN inhibition of the gastric mill rhythm. The latter action results from MPN inhibition of projection neurons that excite the gastric mill rhythm. These projection neurons are modulatory commissural neuron 1 (MCN1) and commissural projection neuron 2 (CPN2). MPN excitation of the pyloric rhythm is mimicked by bath application of proctolin, its peptide transmitter. Here, we show that MPN uses only its small molecule transmitter, GABA, to inhibit MCN1 and CPN2 within their ganglion of origin. We also demonstrate that MPN has no proctolin-mediated influence on MCN1 or CPN2, although exogenously applied proctolin directly excites these neurons. Thus, motor pattern selection occurs during MPN activation via proctolin actions on the STG network and GABA-mediated actions on projection neurons in the commissural ganglia, demonstrating a spatial and functional segregation of cotransmitter actions.

Coordination of limb movements: three types of intersegmental interneurons in the swimmeret system and their responses to changes in excitation

Coordination of limb movements: three types of intersegmental interneurons in the swimmeret system and their responses to changes in excitation. During forward locomotion, the movements of swimmerets on different segments of the crayfish abdomen are coordinated so that more posterior swimmerets lead their anterior neighbors by approximately 25%. This coordination is accomplished by mechanisms within the abdominal nerve cord. Here we describe three different types of intersegmental swimmeret interneurons that are necessary and sufficient to accomplish this coordination. These interneurons could be identified both by their structures within their home ganglion and by their physiological properties. These interneurons occur as bilateral pairs in each ganglion that innervates swimmerets, and their axons traverse the minuscule tract (MnT) of their home ganglion before leaving to project to neighboring ganglia. Two types, ASCE and ASCL, projected an axon anteriorly; the third type, DSC, projected posteriorly. Each type fires a burst of impulses starting at a different phase of the swimmeret cycle in its home ganglion. In active preparations, excitation of individual ASCE or DSC interneurons at different phases in the cycle affected the timing of the next cycle in the interneuron's target ganglion. The axons of these interneurons that projected between two ganglia ran close together, and their firing often could be recorded by the same electrode. Experiments in which either this tract or the rest of the intersegmental connectives was cut bilaterally showed that these interneurons were both necessary and sufficient for coordination of neighboring swimmerets. When the level of excitation of the swimmeret system was increased by bath application of carbachol, the period of the system's cycle shortened, but the characteristic phase difference within and between ganglia was preserved. Each of these interneurons responded to this increase in excitation by increasing the frequency of impulses within each burst, but the phases and relative durations of their bursts did not change, and their activity remained coordinated with the cycle in their home ganglion. The decrease in duration of each burst was matched to the increase in impulse frequency within the burst so that the mean numbers of impulses per burst did not change significantly despite a threefold change in period. These three types of interneurons appear to form a concatenated intersegmental coordinating circuit that imposes a particular intersegmental phase on the local pattern generating modules innervating each swimmeret. This circuit is asymmetric, and forces posterior segments to lead each cycle of output.

Intersegmental coordination of swimmeret movements: mathematical models and neural circuits

Swimmerets move periodically through a cycle of power-strokes and return-strokes. Swimmerets on neighboring segments differ in phase by approximately 25%, and maintain this difference even when the period of the cycle changes from < 1 to > 4 Hz. We constructed a minimal cellular model of the segmental pattern-generating circuit which incorporated its essential components, and whose dynamics were like those of the local circuit. Three different intersegmental coordinating units were known to link neighboring ganglia, but their targets are unknown. We constructed different intersegmental circuits which these units might form between neighboring cellular models, and compared their dynamics with the real system. One intersegmental circuit could maintain an approximately 25% phase difference through a range of periods. In physiological experiments, we identified three types of intersegmental interneurons that originate in each ganglion and project to its neighbors. These neurons fire bursts at certain parts of the swimmeret cycle in their home ganglion. These three neurons are necessary and sufficient to maintain normal coordination between neighboring segments. Their properties conform to the predictions of the cellular model.

Modulation of force during locomotion: differential action of crustacean cardioactive peptide on power-stroke and return- stroke motor neurons

Crustacean cardioactive peptide (CCAP) elicited expression of the motor pattern that drives coordinated swimmeret beating in crayfish and modulated this pattern in a dose-dependent manner. In each ganglion that innervates swimmerets, neurons with CCAP-like immunoreactivity sent processes to the lateral neuropils, which contain branches of swimmeret motor neurons and the local pattern-generating circuits. CCAP affected each of the four functional groups of motor neurons, power-stroke excitors (PSE), return-stroke excitors (RSE), power-stroke inhibitors (PSI), and return-stroke inhibitors (RSI), that innervate each swimmeret. When CCAP was superfused, the membrane potentials of these neurons began to oscillate periodically about their mean potentials. The mean potentials of PSE and RSI neurons depolarized, and some of these neurons began to fire during each depolarization. Both intensity and durations of PSE bursts increased significantly. The mean potentials of RSE and PSI neurons hyperpolarized, and these neurons were less likely to fire during each depolarization. When CCAP was superfused in a low Ca2+ saline that blocked chemical transmission, these changes in mean potential persisted, but the periodic oscillations disappeared. These results are evidence that CCAP acts at two levels: activation of local premotor circuits and direct modulation of swimmeret motor neurons. The action on motor neurons is differential; PSEs and RSIs are excited, but RSEs and PSIs are inhibited. The consequences of this selectivity are to increase intensity of bursts of impulses that excite power-stroke muscles.

How does the crayfish swimmeret system work? Insights from nearest-neighbor coupled oscillator models

Rhythmic movements of crayfish swimmerets are coordinated by a neural circuit that links their four abdominal ganglia. Each swimmeret is driven by its own small local circuit, or pattern-generating module. We modeled this network as a chain of four oscillators, bidirectionally coupled to their nearest neighbors, and tested the model's ability to reproduce experimentally observed changes in intersegmental phases and in period caused by differential excitation of selected abdominal ganglia. The choices needed to match the experimental data lead to the following predictions: coupling between ganglia is asymmetric; the ascending and descending coupling have approximately equal strengths; intersegmental coupling does not significantly affect the frequency of the system; and excitation affects the intrinsic frequencies of the oscillators and might also change properties of intersegmental coupling.

A test of the excitability-gradient hypothesis in the swimmeret system of crayfish

The motor pattern that drives coordinated movements of swimmerets in different segments during forward swimming characteristically begins with a power-stroke by the most posterior limbs, followed progressively by power-strokes of each of the more anterior limbs. To explain this caudal-to-rostral progression, the hypothesis was proposed that the neurons that drive the most posterior swimmerets are more excitable than their more anterior counterparts, and so reach threshold first. To test this excitability-gradient hypothesis, I used carbachol to excite expression of the swimmeret motor pattern and used tetrodotoxin (TTX), sucrose solutions, and cutting to block the flow of information between anterior and posterior segments. I showed that the swimmeret activity elicited by carbachol is like that produced when the swimmeret system is spontaneously active and that blocking an intersegmental connective uncoupled swimmeret activity on opposite sides of the block. When anterior and posterior segments were isolated from each other, the frequencies of the motor patterns expressed by anterior segments were not slower than those expressed by posterior segments exposed to the same concentrations of carbachol. This result was independent of the concentration of carbachol applied and of the number of segmental ganglia that remained connected. When TTX was used to block information flow, the motor patterns produced in segments anterior to the block were significantly faster than those from segments posterior to the block. These observations contradict the predictions of the excitability-gradient hypothesis and lead to the conclusion that the hypothesis is incorrect.