Abemaciclib Inhibits Renal Tubular Secretion Without Changing Glomerular Filtration Rate

Efficacy and Safety of Abemaciclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for HR+/HER2- Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

Breast cancer, particularly the hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) subtype, remains a major global health concern. Abemaciclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, has shown promising results in treating advanced cases. This study comprehensively assesses the efficacy and safety of abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer.

METHODS

Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov til December 2023. Inclusion criteria encompassed randomized controlled trials and retrospective cohort studies reporting on abemaciclib in approved doses, either as monotherapy or in combination. Outcome assessments included progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), side effects/adverse effects (SE/AE), and overall survival (OS). Quality assessment utilized Cochrane's revised risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Pooled results of 22 studies involving 14,010 patients revealed that abemaciclib significantly improved PFS (hazard ratio=0.53; 95% CI: 0.48-0.59; P=0.00; I2=0%), ORR (risk ratio=2.31; 95% CI: 1.93-2.75; P=0.00; I2=0%), and OS (risk ratio=0.76 (95% CI: 0.65-0.87; P=0.001; I2=0%). However, abemaciclib increased the risk of adverse events in the fulvestrant and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) combinations, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Abemaciclib, particularly in combination with fulvestrant, emerges as an effective therapeutic option for HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer, improving PFS and OS. The higher toxicity profile warrants cautious use, especially in treatment-naive patients.

Practical Guidance on Abemaciclib in Combination with Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Treating Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative High-Risk Early Breast Cancer

The most common subtype of breast cancer is hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, accounting for 65-70% of all breast cancer cases diagnosed in the United States. Until 2015, single-agent endocrine therapy (ET) was the recommended first-line treatment for metastatic HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer. However, the paradigm has since shifted, as targeted therapy is now recommended in combination with ET. The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of this breast cancer subtype, and combining either palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib with ET is now the standard first-line treatment for metastatic disease. Results of clinical trials in the metastatic setting have demonstrated that treatment with the combination of a CDK4/6 inhibitor and ET rather than ET alone is associated with longer overall survival, longer progression-free survival, and better objective response rates. Each of the CDK4/6 inhibitors has been investigated in combination with ET in patients with early-stage HR-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer who are at high risk of relapse. In October 2021, abemaciclib was the first CDK4/6 inhibitor approved in combination with ET by the US Food and Drug Administration for adjuvant treatment of patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer. Herein, we provide practical guidance on the use of abemaciclib in combination with ET for HR-positive, HER2-negative, high-risk early breast cancer to assist clinicians in their day-to-day practice, and we review clinically relevant topics of dosing, side effect management, sequencing and optimal timing for initiation, and patient selection.

Challenges of Renal Function Assessment in Breast Cancer Patients Treated With Abemaciclib: A Case Report

Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor used for hormone-receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-negative breast cancer, can lead to elevated serum creatinine without implications on the true renal function. Although clinical trials have shown no increase in other kidney function biomarkers, this may still represent a challenge in cancer patients. We report a case of a 74-year-old female who presented with creatinine and cystatin-C elevation during treatment with abemaciclib without an equivalent decrease in measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) with renal scintigraphy. The confirmation of adequate kidney function allowed for the maintenance of treatments that would otherwise be limited by renal impairment. Healthcare providers should be aware of abemaciclib's effect on serum creatinine but should not eliminate the possibility of actual kidney injury. Alternative biomarkers for GFR assessment are recommended, although the usefulness of cystatin-C in patients receiving abemaciclib should be investigated in greater depth.

Systemic oncological therapy in breast cancer patients on dialysis

The advancement of renal replacement therapy has significantly enhanced the survival rates of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) over time. However, this prolonged survival has also been associated with a higher likelihood of cancer diagnoses among these patients including breast cancer. Breast cancer treatment typically involves surgery, radiation, and systemic therapies, with approaches tailored to cancer type, stage, and patient preferences. However, renal replacement therapy complicates systemic therapy due to altered drug clearance and the necessity for dialysis sessions. This review emphasizes the need for optimized dosing and administration strategies for systemic breast cancer treatments in dialysis patients, aiming to ensure both efficacy and safety. Additionally, challenges in breast cancer screening and diagnosis in this population, including soft-tissue calcifications, are highlighted.

Survey of Pharmaceutical Industry's Best Practices around In Vitro Transporter Assessment and Implications for Drug Development: Considerations from the International Consortium for Innovation and Quality for Pharmaceutical Development Transporter Working Group

The International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development Transporter Working Group had a rare opportunity to analyze a crosspharma collation of in vitro data and assay methods for the evaluation of drug transporter substrate and inhibitor potential. Experiments were generally performed in accordance with regulatory guidelines. Discrepancies, such as not considering the impact of preincubation for inhibition and free or measured in vitro drug concentrations, may be due to the retrospective nature of the dataset and analysis. Lipophilicity was a frequent indicator of crosstransport inhibition (P-gp, BCRP, OATP1B, and OCT1), with high molecular weight (MW ≥500 Da) also common for OATP1B and BCRP inhibitors. A high level of overlap in in vitro inhibition across transporters was identified for BCRP, OATP1B1, and MATE1, suggesting that prediction of DDIs for these transporters will be common. In contrast, inhibition of OAT1 did not coincide with inhibition of any other transporter. Neutrals, bases, and compounds with intermediate-high lipophilicity tended to be P-gp and/or BCRP substrates, whereas compounds with MW <500 Da tended to be OAT3 substrates. Interestingly, the majority of in vitro inhibitors were not reported to be followed up with a clinical study by the submitting company, whereas those compounds identified as substrates generally were. Approaches to metabolite testing were generally found to be similar to parent testing, with metabolites generally being equally or less potent than parent compounds. However, examples where metabolites inhibited transporters in vitro were identified, supporting the regulatory requirement for in vitro testing of metabolites to enable integrated clinical DDI risk assessment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A diverse dataset showed that transporter inhibition often correlated with lipophilicity and molecular weight (>500 Da). Overlapping transporter inhibition was identified, particularly that inhibition of BCRP, OATP1B1, and MATE1 was frequent if the compound inhibited other transporters. In contrast, inhibition of OAT1 did not correlate with the other drug transporters tested.

Case report: A case of pseudo-acute kidney injury due to cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor

Various classes of targeted therapies have emerged in the last few years, which have revolutionized cancer treatment, and improved the prognosis and survival of cancer patients. Unfortunately, these agents have serious toxic effects on the kidneys. Some of the toxic effects are hypertension, acute kidney injury (AKI), and proteinuria. One interesting phenomenon that has emerged recently is pseudo-acute kidney injury due to the interference with the tubular secretion of creatinine by some of the targeted therapeutic agents. Understanding this physiology is needed to avoid unnecessary investigation and withholding of lifesaving chemo regimen. Alternative methods to assess renal function such as cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) can differentiate true AKI from pseudo-AKI. Here, we describe one such case of pseudo-AKI from cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, which inhibits tubular secretion of creatinine. Using cystatin-C-based eGFR revealed pseudo-AKI in this case.

CDK4/6 inhibitors: The Devil is in the Detail

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update on the most recent clinical evidence on CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in the treatment of hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative breast cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decade, CDK4/6i have become part of the standard of care treatment of patients with both metastatic and high-risk early HR + /HER2- breast cancers. The three available CDK4/6i (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have been extensively studied in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) with consistent prolongation of progression free survival; however, ribociclib has emerged as the preferred first line agent in mBC given overall survival benefit over endocrine monotherapy. In early BC, abemaciclib is the only currently approved agent while ribociclib has early positive clinical trial data. Toxicities and financial burden limit the use of CDK4/6i in all patients and resource-poor settings, and optimal timing of their use in mBC remains unclear. There is considerable evidence for the use of CDK4/6i in metastatic and early HR + /HER2- breast cancer, but knowledge gaps remain, and further research is necessary to better define their optimal use.

Cancer drugs and acute kidney injury: new therapies and new challenges

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cancer therapies continue to evolve at a rapid pace and although novel treatments, including immunotherapies and targeted therapies have allowed for substantial improvements in cancer survival, they carry associated risks of acute kidney injury (AKI). We aim to summarize the existing literature on AKI associated with the spectrum of systemic cancer treatments, including conventional chemotherapies, newer immunotherapies, and the growing number of targeted cancer therapies, which may be associated with both AKI and 'pseudo-AKI'.

RECENT FINDINGS

Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies (e.g. cisplatin and other platinum-based agents, methotrexate, pemetrexed, ifosfamide, etc.) with well recognized nephrotoxicities (predominantly tubulointerstitial injury) remain in widespread use. Immunotherapies (e.g., immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T therapies) may be associated with kidney immune-related adverse events, most often acute interstitial nephritis, and rarely, glomerular disease. Recently, multiple targeted cancer therapies have been associated with reduced renal tubular secretion of creatinine, causing elevations in serum creatinine and apparent 'pseudo-AKI'. To complicate matters further, these agents have had biopsy-proven, 'true' kidney injury attributed to them in numerous case reports.

SUMMARY

Clinicians in nephrology and oncology must be aware of the various potential kidney risks with these agents and recognize those with clinically meaningful impact on both cancer and kidney outcomes.

Abemaciclib pharmacology and interactions in the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer: a critical review

Abemaciclib (ABE) in combination with endocrine therapy represents the mainstay treatment for either endocrine-resistant metastatic or high-risk early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Hence, an adequate knowledge of this agent pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and of its drug-drug interactions (DDIs) is crucial for an optimal patients management. Additionally, ABE interference with food and complementary/alternative medicines should be taken into account in the clinical practice. Several online tools allow to freely check DDIs and can be easily consulted before prescribing ABE. According to one of this instruments, ABE display the lowest number of interactions among the available cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors. Still, clinicians should be aware that online tools cannot replace the technical datasheet of the drug as well as a comprehensive clinical assessment for each patient. Here we critically review the main pharmacological features of ABE, then focusing on its potential interactions with drugs, food, and alternative medicine, in order to provide a guide for its optimal use in the treatment of HR+/HER2- breast cancer patients.

A comparison between the adverse event profiles of patients receiving palbociclib and abemaciclib: analysis of two real-world databases

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib and abemaciclib are cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors currently used to treat breast cancer. Although their therapeutic efficacies are considered comparable, differences in adverse event (AE) profiles of the two drugs remain unclear.

AIM

We analysed two real-world databases, the World Health Organization's VigiBase and the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), to identify differences in AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib.

METHOD

Data of patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib or abemaciclib recorded until December 2022 were extracted from the VigiBase and FAERS databases. In total, 200 types of AEs were analysed. The reporting odds ratios were calculated using a disproportionality analysis.

RESULTS

Cytopenia was frequently reported in patients receiving palbociclib, whereas interstitial lung disease and diarrhoea were frequently reported in those receiving abemaciclib. Moreover, psychiatric and nervous system disorders were more common in the palbociclib group, whereas renal and urinary disorders were more common in the abemaciclib group.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to show comprehensively the disparities in the AE profiles of palbociclib and abemaciclib. The findings highlight the importance of considering these differences when selecting a suitable CDK4/6 inhibitor to ensure safe and favourable outcomes for patients with breast cancer.

Case report: abemaciclib-induced syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) without underlying kidney injury in a patient with early-stage estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer

The CDK4/6 inhibitor, abemaciclib, is now the standard of care adjuvant therapy for patients with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) tumors at high risk of recurrence. Real-world usage uncovers emerging side effects that may have been previously unreported in clinical trials. Here, we present the clinical course of a patient who developed a syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone (SIADH) without underlying kidney injury due to abemaciclib use.

Brief Report: Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Lung Cancers That Inhibit MATE-1 Can Lead to "False" Decreases in Renal Function

INTRODUCTION

Select tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) used to treat oncogene-driven lung cancers also inhibit MATE-1. When MATE-1 is blocked, creatinine is retained in the serum. Elevated creatinine levels raise the specter of drug-induced intrarenal insufficiency despite the lack of true renal injury. We conducted a systematic analysis of MATE-1 inhibitor (MATEi)-treated patients to comprehensively characterize this phenomenon.

METHODS

Patients with oncogene-driven lung cancer treated with a wide variety of MATEi TKIs (brigatinib, cabozantinib, capmatinib, crizotinib, entrectinib, lorlatinib, pralsetinib, selpercatinib, and tepotinib) were eligible for an analysis of renal dysfunction. Acute kidney injury was classified on the basis of creatinine levels (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria) as stage 1 (≥1.5× but <2× baseline), stage 2 (≥2× but <3× baseline), or stage 3 (>3× baseline). When available, cystatin C, a marker of kidney function unaffected by MATE-1, was used to evaluate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

RESULTS

We identified 863 patients receiving MATEi TKIs including crizotinib (39%, n = 333), lorlatinib (17%, n = 144), cabozantinib (10%, n = 87), selpercatinib (10%, n = 82), capmatinib (9%, n = 77), brigatinib (6%, n = 53), entrectinib (5%, n = 45), tepotinib (5%, n = 41), and pralsetinib (0.1%, n = 1). Of the 90 patients (10%) with acute kidney injury, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes stages 1, 2, and 3 were observed in 72% (n = 65), 21% (n = 19), and 7% (n = 6) of patients, respectively. Concurrently drawn creatinine and cystatin C levels on TKI therapy were available for 17 patients. In most cases (n = 15 of 17), the calculated GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine. The percentage of patients whose GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine by less than 10 mL/min, 10 to 19 mL/min, 20 to 29 mL/min, and more than or equal to 30 mL/min was 27% (n = four of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), 20% (n = three of 15), and 33% (n = five of 15), respectively. Long-term data in three patients that spanned 3 years revealed that GFR was higher using cystatin C versus creatinine in 96% (n = 49 of 51) of all time points. Using a virtual clinical trial GFR cutoff of 40 mL/min, the percentage of eligible patients rose from 41% (n = seven of 17) using creatinine calculations to 71% (n = 12 of 17) using cystatin C calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

The calculated GFR in patients with cancer receiving MATEi TKIs was higher in almost all cases when using cystatin C. When serum creatinine level seems elevated in patients receiving MATE-1 inhibitors, we recommend recalculating GFR using cystatin C before searching for other etiologies of kidney injury and reducing or stopping TKI therapy.

CDK4/6 inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: Focus on toxicity and safety

The development of oral cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib, has revolutionized the treatment landscape for patients with hormone-receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (BC). When combined with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant, these agents have been approved as first-line therapy in the metastatic setting. Abemaciclib has also gained FDA approval for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive, early BC at high risk of recurrence. Moreover, ribociclib has recently improved disease-free survival in patients with stage II or III HR+/HER2-negative early BC. CDK4/6 inhibitors have favorable safety profiles. However, the available agents have different toxicity profiles that must be clearly discussed with the patients for optimal clinical decisions. This manuscript aims to review CDK4/6 inhibitor-related treatment-associated adverse events, identify risk factors for intolerable adverse events, and assess their safety in special patient populations such as the elderly and those with renal insufficiency. Enhanced knowledge and understanding of CDK4/6 inhibitor-related toxicities can improve treatment strategies and ultimately enhance patient care.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure-response analyses of pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors including cholangiocarcinoma

Pemigatinib is a selective, potent, oral inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-3 with efficacy in patients with previously treated, advanced/metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with FGFR2 alterations. A previously developed population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of pemigatinib was refined using an updated dataset with 467 participants from seven clinical studies, including patients with CCA. Updated PK model parameters were used to evaluate the association between pemigatinib exposure and efficacy and safety. Pemigatinib PK was adequately described by a two-compartment model with linear elimination and sequential zero- and first-order absorption. The final model successfully minimized, had a successful covariance step, and showed unbiased goodness-of-fit. Estimated first-order absorption rate constant and apparent clearance were 3.7/h and 10.7 L/h, respectively. Sex, baseline body weight, and concomitant use of phosphate binders, proton pump inhibitors, or histamine-2 antagonists significantly impacted PK parameters; however, the impact of covariates on PK exposure was not clinically significant. Steady-state pemigatinib exposure and mean change from baseline in serum phosphate concentration were associated with objective response rate in a bell-shaped relationship and were significantly associated with increased hyperphosphatemia. Pemigatinib exposure was associated with treatment-emergent adverse events, such as decreased appetite, nausea, and stomatitis, although the relationships were shallow. Overall, analyses indicate that 13.5 mg pemigatinib once daily in 21-day cycles (2 weeks on, 1 week off) offers a favorable benefit-risk profile in patients with advanced/metastatic or surgically unresectable CCA and is the optimal dose for clinical development.

Late onset toxicities associated with the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer patients: a multidisciplinary, pan-EU position paper regarding their optimal management. The GIOCONDA project

The personalization of therapies in breast cancer has favoured the introduction of new molecular-targeted therapies into clinical practice. Among them, cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors have acquired increasing importance, with the approval in recent years of palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib in combination with endocrine therapy. Currently, no guidelines are available to monitor and manage potential long-term toxicities associated with the use of these drugs. A multidisciplinary panel of European oncologists, was supported by a pharmacologist, a hematologist, a hepatologist and a pulmonologist to discuss the management of long-term toxicities, based on the literature review and their clinical experience. The panel provided detailed roadmaps to manage long-term toxicities associated with the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in clinical practice. Knowing the frequency and characteristics of the toxicity profile associated with each CDK4/6 inhibitor is important in the decision-making process to match the right drug to the right patient.

Chapter 1: Evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy, from clinical practice guidelines for the management of kidney injury during anticancer drug therapy 2022

The prevalence of CKD may be higher in patients with cancer than in those without due to the addition of cancer-specific risk factors to those already present for CKD. In this review, we describe the evaluation of kidney function in patients undergoing anticancer drug therapy. When anticancer drug therapy is administered, kidney function is evaluated to (1) set the dose of renally excretable drugs, (2) detect kidney disease associated with the cancer and its treatment, and (3) obtain baseline values for long-term monitoring. Owing to some requirements for use in clinical practice, a GFR estimation method such as the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, CKD-EPI, and the Japanese Society of Nephrology's GFR estimation formula has been developed that is simple, inexpensive, and provides rapid results. However, an important clinical question is whether they can be used as a method of GFR evaluation in patients with cancer. When designing a drug dosing regimen in consideration of kidney function, it is important to make a comprehensive judgment, recognizing that there are limitations regardless of which estimation formula is used or if GFR is directly measured. Although CTCAEs are commonly used as criteria for evaluating kidney disease-related adverse events that occur during anticancer drug therapy, a specialized approach using KDIGO criteria or other criteria is required when nephrologists intervene in treatment. Each drug is associated with the different disorders related to the kidney. And various risk factors for kidney disease associated with each anticancer drug therapy.

Quantitative Consideration of Clinical Increases in Serum Creatinine Caused by Renal Transporter Inhibition

Creatinine is a common biomarker of renal function and is secreted in the renal tubular cells via drug transporters, such as organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) 1/2-K. To differentiate between drug-induced acute kidney injury (AKI) and drug interactions through the renal transporter, it has been examined whether these transporter inhibitions quantitatively explained increases in serum creatinine (SCr) at their clinically relevant concentrations using drugs without any changes in renal function. For such renal transporter inhibitors and recently approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), this mini-review describes clinical increases in SCr and inhibitory potentials against the renal transporters. Most cases of SCr elevations can be explained by considering the renal transporter inhibitions based on unbound maximum plasma concentrations, except for drugs associated with obvious changes in renal function. SCr increases for cobicistat, dolutegravir, and dronedarone, and some TKIs were significantly underestimated, and these underestimations were suggested to be associated with low plasma unbound fractions. Sensitivity analysis of SCr elevations regarding inhibitory potentials of MATE1/2-K demonstrated that typical inhibitors such as cimetidine, DX-619, pyrimethamine, and trimethoprim could give false interpretations of AKI according to the criteria based on relative or absolute levels of SCr elevations. Recent progress and current challenges of physiologically-based pharmacokinetics modeling for creatinine disposition were also summarized. Although it should be noted for the potential impact of in vitro assay designs on clinical translatability of transporter inhibitions data, mechanistic approaches could support decision-making in clinical development to differentiate between AKI and creatinine-drug interactions. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Serum creatinine (SCr) is widely used as an indicator of kidney function, but it increases due to inhibitions of renal transporters, such as multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K despite no functional changes in the kidney. Such SCr elevations were quantitatively explained by renal transporter inhibitions except for some drugs with high protein binding. The present analysis demonstrated that clinically relevant inhibitors of the renal transporters could cause SCr elevations above levels corresponding to acute kidney injury criteria.

Disproportionality Analysis of Abemaciclib in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System: A Real-World Post-Marketing Pharmacovigilance Assessment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Because of the limitations of clinical trials, which are not representative of large real-world populations, rare events and long-term safety concerns cannot be detected. The current study aimed to evaluate the adverse events of abemaciclib through data mining of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

METHODS

Reporting odds ratio and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network of information components were used to quantify the adverse event signals of abemaciclib from the third quarter of 2017 to the first quarter of 2022. Serious and non-serious cases were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test or Chi-squared test, and clinical priority was assigned to signals by scoring (range 0-10 points) five features using a rating scale.

RESULTS

A total of 6125 reports of abemaciclib as the "primary suspected" and 72 significant adverse events of abemaciclib were identified. Common adverse events, such as diarrhea, neutropenia, alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, and serum creatinine increases, and other adverse events, including thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, interstitial lung disease, and pneumonitis were of high concern. Of note, 17 preferred terms were classified as unexpected adverse events that uncovered in the label. In addition, 1, 26, and 45 adverse events were identified as strong, moderate, and weak clinical priorities. The median time to onset for strong, moderate, and weak clinical priority signals was 49, 22, and 28 days, respectively. All of the disproportionality signals had early failure type features, suggesting that adverse events of abemaciclib gradually decreased over time.

CONCLUSIONS

The discovery of disproportionality signals could potentially prompt improved awareness of toxicities for abemaciclib, and the results of time to onset, serious and non-serious reports, and clinical priority analyses provided some supporting evidence for clinicians to manage adverse events.

The Therapeutic Potential of CDK4/6 Inhibitors, Novel Cancer Drugs, in Kidney Diseases

Inflammation is a crucial pathological feature in cancers and kidney diseases, playing a significant role in disease progression. Cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6 not only contribute to cell cycle progression but also participate in cell metabolism, immunogenicity and anti-tumor immune responses. Recently, CDK4/6 inhibitors have gained approval for investigational treatment of breast cancer and various other tumors. Kidney diseases and cancers commonly exhibit characteristic pathological features, such as the involvement of inflammatory cells and persistent chronic inflammation. Remarkably, CDK4/6 inhibitors have demonstrated impressive efficacy in treating non-cancerous conditions, including certain kidney diseases. Current studies have identified the renoprotective effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors, presenting a novel idea and potential direction for treating kidney diseases in the future. In this review, we briefly reviewed the cell cycle in mammals and the role of CDK4/6 in regulating it. We then provided an introduction to CDK4/6 inhibitors and their use in cancer treatment. Additionally, we emphasized the importance of these inhibitors in the treatment of kidney diseases. Collectively, growing evidence demonstrates that targeting CDK4 and CDK6 through CDK4/6 inhibitors might have therapeutic benefits in various cancers and kidney diseases and should be further explored in the future.

Adverse kidney outcomes of CDK 4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors have significantly improved overall and progression free survival of patients with metastatic breast cancer, but their effect on short and long-term kidney function is unknown. We found that early, mild estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline was common in patients treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors; however, severe kidney injury is rare and long-term eGFR decline is uncommon.

Pseudo-AKI associated with targeted anti-cancer agents-the truth is in the eye of the filtration marker

Besides true acute kidney injury (AKI), the occurrence of pseudo-AKI has been associated with several targeted agents. To improve the management of cancer patients treated with targeted agents, we need to be aware of this and use diagnostic approaches to differentiate between pseudo-AKI and AKI. In an article by Wijtvliet et al. in this issue of CKJ, tepotinib is added to the list of targeted agents associated with pseudo-AKI. In this editorial we discuss the current literature regarding pseudo-AKI and true AKI associated with targeted agents, and subsequently propose a management strategy to monitor kidney function in patients treated with targeted agents.

Nephrotoxicity associated with anticancer agents: perspective on onconephrology from nephrologists

Nephrotoxicity is one of the most important complications in cancer patients. In particular, acute kidney injury (AKI) is known to be associated with discontinuing effective oncological treatments, longer hospitalizations, increased costs, and a higher risk of death. In addition to acute kidney injury, clinical signs associated with nephrotoxicity during treatment with anticancer agents include chronic kidney disease, proteinuria, hypertension, electrolyte abnormalities, and other characteristic manifestations. Many of these signs are caused both by cancer treatment as well as by cancer itself. Therefore, it is important to carefully recognize whether the underlying causes of renal impairment in cancer patients are cancer-related, treatment-related, or both. This review describes the epidemiology and pathophysiology of anticancer agent-induced acute kidney injury, proteinuria, hypertension, and other characteristic manifestations.

Onconephrology 2022: An Update

Onconephrology is an upcoming and expanding subspecialty that deals with the intersections between hematology/oncology and nephrology. With the paradigm shift in the understanding of cancer immunobiology and mechanisms of oncotherapeutic drug toxicities, it is important for a nephrologist to have a sound understanding of this field. Over the last 5 years, there have been immense developments in our understanding of kidney-related adverse events from various targeted, immuno- and cellular-based therapies. Pathogenic mechanisms of electrolyte imbalance, hypertension (oncohypertension), and AKI from multiple forms of cancer therapies have been explored. Significant research has also been conducted in the field of transplant onconephrology. In this review, we have tried to assimilate the most recent updates in the last 2 years in this ever-growing and fascinating field.

Real-world data for the renal safety of abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

Our study evaluated the renal safety of abemaciclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) with bisphosphonate as a treatment option for hormone receptor positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC), especially with bone metastasis.

METHODS

Data were collected from HR+/HER2- ABC patients who received abemaciclib with ET between March 2021 and May 2022 in a single medical center in China. We performed an analysis of the change in serum creatine (Cr) and creatine clearance (CrCl), time to first abnormal Cr value, and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade of increased creatinine.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included in the final analysis, with a median age of 56 years and a median weight of 65 kg. Any grade laboratory-assessing increased Cr occurred in 87.1% of patients, while CrCl rarely went down to 30 ml/min. Associations between start dose with grade of increased Cr and menopausal status with alert value, which is defined as creatinine clearance <30 ml/min, were indicated.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that abemaciclib combined with bisphosphonate would be safe for renal function in HR+/HER2- ABC patients with bone metastases.

Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer

Advances in cancer therapy have significantly improved overall patient survival; however, AKI remains a common complication in patients with cancer, occurring in anywhere from 11% to 22% of patients, depending on patient-related or cancer-specific factors. Critically ill patients with cancer as well as patients with certain malignancies (e.g., leukemias, lymphomas, multiple myeloma, and renal cell carcinoma) are at highest risk of developing AKI. AKI may be a consequence of the underlying malignancy itself or from the wide array of therapies used to treat it. Cancer-associated AKI can affect virtually every compartment of the nephron and can present as subclinical AKI or as overt acute tubular injury, tubulointerstitial nephritis, or thrombotic microangiopathy, among others. AKI can have major repercussions for patients with cancer, potentially jeopardizing further eligibility for therapy and leading to greater morbidity and mortality. This review highlights the epidemiology of AKI in critically ill patients with cancer, risk factors for AKI, and common pathologies associated with certain cancer therapies, as well as the management of AKI in different clinical scenarios. It highlights gaps in our knowledge of AKI in patients with cancer, including the lack of validated biomarkers, as well as evidence-based therapies to prevent AKI and its deleterious consequences.

Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers

Why does the usual dose of medication work for a person while another individual cannot give the expected response to the same drug? On the other hand, how come half of the usual dose of an analgesic relieves an individual’s pain immediately, as another man continue to suffer even after taking double dose? Although a treatment method has been successfully used in majority of the population for many years, why does the same therapy cause serious side effects in another region of the world? Most presently approved therapies are not effective in all patients. For example, 20-40% of patients with depression respond poorly or not at all to antidepressant drug therapy. Many patients are resistant to the effects of antiasthmatics and antiulcer drugs or drug treatment of hyperlipidemia and many other diseases. The reason for all those is basically interindividual differences in genomic structures of people, which are explained in this chapter in terms of the systems and the most frequently used drugs in clinical treatment.

An open label, randomized phase 2 trial assessing the impact of food on the tolerability of abemaciclib in patients with advanced breast cancer

Purpose

Abemaciclib, a CDK4 & 6 inhibitor, is indicated for advanced breast cancer treatment. Diarrhea is a frequently associated adverse event of abemaciclib. The study objective was to investigate if food intake impacts local gastrointestinal toxicity.

Methods

This Phase 2 study (I3Y-MC-JPCP, NCT03703466) randomized 72 patients 1:1:1 to receive abemaciclib 200 mg monotherapy twice daily (1) with a meal, (2) in a modified fasting state or (3) without regard to food. Primary endpoints included: incidence of investigator assessed severe (≥ Grade 3), prolonged (> 7 days) Grade 2 diarrhea, treatment discontinuation, dose modifications, and loperamide utilization during the first 3 cycles of treatment. Patient outcomes were captured via a daily electronic diary. Pharmacokinetics (PK) are reported.

Results

Incidence of investigator assessed severe diarrhea (Grade ≥ 3) was 1.4% (1 patient in Arm 1). Median duration of Grade 3 diarrhea was 1 day by both investigator assessment (1 patient in Arm 1) and patient-reported assessment (1 patient each in Arms 1 and 3). Median duration of investigator-assessed Grade 2 diarrhea was 2 days overall. No patient discontinued treatment due to diarrhea. Nine patients (12.7%) had a dose reduction, and 7 patients (9.9%) had a dose omission due to diarrhea. Ninety-four percent of patients used loperamide at least once. Abemaciclib PK was comparable across the 3 arms.

Conclusion

The results suggest that diarrhea incidence associated with abemaciclib was unrelated to timing of food intake, was predominantly low grade, of short duration and well managed with loperamide and dose modifications.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10549-022-06690-5.

Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug Interaction Studies Between Trilaciclib and Midazolam, Metformin, Rifampin, Itraconazole, and Topotecan in Healthy Volunteers and Patients with Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Background and Objective

Trilaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor indicated to decrease the incidence of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Trilaciclib is a substrate and time-dependent inhibitor of cytochrome P450 3A4 and an inhibitor of multidrug and toxin extrusion 1, multidrug and toxin extrusion 2-K, organic cation transporter 1, and organic cation transporter 2. Here, we investigate the pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction potential of trilaciclib.

Methods

Two phase I studies were conducted as prospective, open-label, fixed-sequence drug–drug interaction studies in healthy subjects (n = 57, n = 20) to investigate potential interactions between intravenously administered trilaciclib (200 or 240 mg/m²) and orally administered midazolam (5 mg), metformin (1000 mg), itraconazole (200 mg), and rifampin (600 mg). A population pharmacokinetic model was fit to phase Ib/IIa data in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (n = 114) to assess the impact of trilaciclib dose and exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve) on topotecan clearance.

Results

Coadministration with trilaciclib had minimal effects on the exposure (area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity) of midazolam (geometric least-square mean ratio [GMR] vs midazolam alone 1.065; 90% confidence interval [CI] 0.984–1.154) but statistically significantly increased plasma exposure (GMR 1.654; 90% CI 1.472–1.858) and decreased renal clearance (GMR 0.633; 90% CI 0.572–0.701) of metformin. Coadministration of trilaciclib with rifampin or itraconazole decreased trilaciclib area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity by 17.3% (GMR 0.827; 90% CI 0.785–0.871) and 14.0% (GMR 0.860; 0.820–0.902), respectively, vs trilaciclib alone. Population pharmacokinetic modeling showed no significant effect of trilaciclib on topotecan clearance.

Conclusions

Overall, the drug–drug interaction and safety profiles of trilaciclib in these studies support its continued use in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

Clinical Trial Registration

Study 106: EudraCT number: 2019-002303-18; Study 114: not applicable; Study 03: Clinicaltrials.org: NCT02514447; August 2015.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01179-x.

Efficacy, safety and toxicity management of adjuvant abemaciclib in early stage HR+/HER2- high-risk breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

The majority of the over 250,000 new cases of invasive breast cancer diagnosed in the United States is driven by hormone receptor signaling (HR+). Since 2015, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) for patients facing metastatic disease.

AREAS COVERED

There are now three approved agents in the metastatic setting; abemaciclib, ribociclib, and palbociclib. Due to the almost doubling of progression free survival (PFS) and improvement in overall survival (OS) in the metastatic setting, studies were conducted to examine the benefit of adding CDK4/6i in the adjuvant setting for those patients at high risk for recurrence. Despite negative results of PALLAS (palbociclib) in this setting, monarchE (abemaciclib) showed an improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant recurrence free survival (DRFS) at the 3 year time point for patients with high risk tumor characteristics leading to its approval. Herein, we discuss the data, the population studied and the population in which abemaciclib is approved as well as safety, tolerability, and dose reductions for practical management of these patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Abemaciclib is appropriate and beneficial for those patients with high-risk, node-positive, hormonally-driven breast cancer.

Targeted Cancer Therapies Causing Elevations in Serum Creatinine Through Tubular Secretion Inhibition: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Rationale

Targeted cancer therapies have revolutionized the field of oncology by selecting for specific molecular pathways, thus improving overall clinical prognosis. However, many of these targeted treatments have been reported to have adverse kidney effects, including acute kidney injury, interstitial nephritis, and glomerular disease. Furthermore, some of these targeted therapies have also been found to cause an asymptomatic rise in serum creatinine levels through inhibition of active tubular secretion.

Presenting concerns

A 79-year-old woman was being followed for stage 4 A2 chronic kidney disease secondary to type 2 diabetes and longstanding hypertension. She was diagnosed with invasive mammary carcinoma and was initiated on letrozole, an aromatase inhibitor, and palbociclib, a selective cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, was subsequently added. Prior to the initiation of her treatments, her baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) fluctuated between 25 and 28 mL/min/1.73 m2 over the previous year. After initiating palbociclib, her serum creatinine progressively increased, despite having well-controlled blood pressure and diabetes. In addition, there was no history of pre-renal events nor any sonographic evidence of obstruction. Within 7 months, her eGFR based on serum creatinine had decreased down to 12 mL/min/1.73 m2.

Interventions

Given that there were no clinical or other biochemical changes suggestive of worsening renal function, a serum cystatin C was measured using an immunoturbidimetric assay, which was 1.71 mg/L and correlated with an eGFR of 33 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on the chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (CKD-EPI) cystatin C equation (2012). This value was consistent with her previous baseline. Based on these findings, the significant decrease in eGFR measured by serum creatinine was attributed to the inhibitory effects of palbociclib on tubular creatinine secretion, rather than representing true kidney damage. Thus, a kidney biopsy was not performed in this context.

Outcomes

Seven months later, a repeat serum cystatin C was repeated to assess for any worsening of the patient's kidney function and revealed an eGFR of 35 mL/min/1.73 m2 based on the CKD-EPI cystatin C equation (2012), thus revealing stable kidney function and reinforcing the inhibitory effects of palbociclib on tubular creatinine secretion through its direct effects on kidney transporters.

Teaching points

This case report and literature review acknowledges the importance of using alternative methods of assessing kidney function when patients are undergoing targeted cancer therapies known to affect tubular creatinine secretion, which include cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and mesenchymal-epithelial transition inhibitors. The use of non-creatinine-based markers of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), such as cystatin C and nuclear renal scans, will allow for more accurate estimation of kidney function in the appropriate setting, thus avoiding invasive diagnostic tests and unnecessary adjustments of treatment plans. However, certain targeted cancer therapies have also been proven to cause true kidney injury; therefore, physicians must still maintain a high degree of suspicion and consider invasive investigations and/or cessation or reduction of treatments when alternative measurements of kidney function do not suggest an underestimation of GFR via serum creatinine.

Abemaciclib: The First FDA-Approved CDK4/6 Inhibitor for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+ HER2- Early Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

To review the new indication of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK4/6) inhibitor abemaciclib for the adjuvant treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-), axillary lymph node (LN) positive early breast cancer (EBC) at high risk of recurrence and a Ki-67 ≥20%.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed through PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website (February 1, 2018, to December 23, 2021) to identify relevant information.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Human and animal studies related to pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of abemaciclib were identified.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Addition of abemaciclib to standard of care endocrine therapy (ET) for patients with high-risk clinicopathologic features and Ki-67 ≥20% demonstrated 30% reduction in the risk of developing invasive disease and distant recurrence. At 15.5 months, abemaciclib + ET demonstrated a significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) vs ET alone (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.93, P = 0.01). At 27 months, IDFS benefit was maintained (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.82, P < 0.0001). Diarrhea occurred in more than 80% of patients in the abemaciclib arm.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review describes the clinical applicability of adjuvant abemaciclib for patients with HR+, HER2- EBC at high risk for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant abemaciclib significantly reduces the risk for early development of invasive disease and distant recurrence in patients with HR+, HER2- node positive EBC. Longer follow-up is needed to determine the impact of adjuvant abemaciclib on late disease recurrence and survival outcomes.

Metformin serum concentrations during pregnancy and postpartum - a clinical study in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome

Background and objectives

Metformin is used to treat gestational diabetes. It is also used to treat women with polycystic ovary syndrome and has been shown to prevent late miscarriage and preterm birth. However, increased renal clearance during pregnancy causes a decline in serum concentrations of metformin. The aim of this study was to explore the time course of the pregnancy‐related changes in metformin pharmacokinetics and the return to the non‐pregnant state.

Method

A subgroup of women in the PregMet2 study (n = 73) agreed to provide serum samples at three time‐points in pregnancy (gestational weeks 19, 28 and 32) and once in post partum, (either 2, 4 or 8 weeks after delivery). Serum metformin concentrations were compared using a four‐parameter logistic model.

Findings

The mean steady‐state serum concentration of metformin during pregnancy was 9.39 μmoL/L, whereas the post partum concentration was 12.36 μmoL/L, an increase of 32% (p = 0,019). This change took place already during the first 2 weeks post partum.

Conclusion

Clinicians who treat pregnant women with metformin should be aware of the significant decrease in metformin concentration mediated by pregnancy, and the rapid increase after delivery, as it may impact both the therapeutic efficacy and the risk of adverse drug reactions.

Lactic acidosis, a potential toxicity from drug-drug interaction related to concomitant ribociclib and metformin in preexisting renal insufficiency: A case report

Background

Ribociclib, one of the cyclin‐dependent kinases (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors, in combination with endocrine therapies has been approved in the treatment of hormonal receptor positive, HER‐2 negative metastatic breast cancer worldwide. Long‐term usage of ribociclib with concomitant drugs, potential drug–drug interaction may develop which can limit the therapeutic value of CDK4/6 inhibitor.

Case

A 62‐year‐old with history of non‐insulin dependent diabetic, dyslipidemia, and essential hypertension was diagnosed with HR‐positive, HER‐2 negative metastatic breast cancer and treated with fulvestrant plus ribociclib. Four weeks after administration, elevated serum creatinine was observed, and then severe lactic acidosis with acute respiratory failure was subsequently reported. Ribociclib and fulvestrant were temporarily discontinued. Three days after renal replacement therapy, her clinical was stabilized. Combination ribociclib with metformin resulted in high plasma metformin levels and dangerous consequences. Hence, special precaution should be considered during concomitant treatment with sensitive transporter substrates.

Conclusion

Metformin associated lactic acidosis may potentially occur after combination with ribocilib, an uncommon but lethal complication from the interaction of these drugs, especially in patients who had preexisting renal impairment.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 Inhibitors Palbociclib, Ribociclib, and Abemaciclib

Palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are inhibitors of the cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. In this review, we provide an overview of the available clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of these novel drugs, summarize the results of food-effect and drug-drug interaction studies, and highlight exposure-response and exposure-toxicity relationships. All three drugs exhibit a large inter-individual variability in exposure (coefficient of variation range 40-95% for minimum plasma concentration), are extensively metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4, and have their brain penetration limited by efflux transporters. Abemaciclib has three active metabolites with similar potency that are clinically relevant (i.e., M2, M20, M18), whereas the metabolites of palbociclib and ribociclib are not of clinical significance. Pharmacokinetic exposure increases in a dose-proportional manner for palbociclib, whereas exposure increases under- and over-proportionally with an increasing dose for abemaciclib and ribociclib, respectively. High exposure is associated with an increased risk of neutropenia, and for ribociclib also to corrected QT prolongation. For abemaciclib, a clear exposure-efficacy relationship has been described, while for palbociclib and ribociclib exposure-response analyses remain inconclusive. Future studies are needed to address exposure-efficacy relationships to further improve dosing.

Nephrotoxicity Assessment with Human Kidney Tubuloids using Spherical Nucleic Acid-Based mRNA Nanoflares

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity represents an important cause of acute kidney injury with associated patient morbidity and mortality and is often responsible for termination of drug development, after extensive resource allocation. We have developed a human kidney tubuloid system that phenocopies, in 3D culture, kidney proximal tubules, a primary injury site of most nephrotoxicants. Traditional end point assays are often performed on 2D cultures of cells that have lost their differentiated phenotype. Herein, we pair a tubuloid system with Nanoflare (NF) mRNA nanosensors to achieve a facile, real-time assessment of drug nephrotoxicity. Using kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) mRNA as a model injury biomarker, we verify NF specificity in engineered and adenovirus-transfected cells and confirm their efficacy to report tubular cell injury by aristolochic acid and cisplatin. The system also facilitates nephrotoxicity screening as demonstrated with 10 representative anticancer moieties. 5-Fluorouracil and paclitaxel induce acute tubular injury, as reflected by an NF signal increase.

Clinical and Pharmacologic Differences of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

Targeted therapies such as Cyclin Dependent Kinase 4 and 6 (CDK 4/6) inhibitors have improved the prognosis of metastatic hormone receptor (HR) positive breast cancer by combating the resistance seen with traditional endocrine therapy. The three approved agents currently in the market are palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. Besides the overall similarities associated with CDK4/6 inhibition, there are differences between the three approved agents that may explain the differences noted in unique clinical scenarios- monotherapy, patients with brain metastases or use in the adjuvant setting. This review article will explore the preclinical and pharmacological differences between the three agents and help understand the benefits seen with these agents in certain subgroups of patients with metastatic HR positive breast cancer.

The evolution of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitors in the treatment of cancer

INTRODUCTION

The cell cycle cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) play a critical role in controlling the transition between cell cycle phases, as well as cellular transcription. Aberrant CDK activation is common in cancer, and deregulation of the cell cycle a key hallmark of cancer. Although CDK4/6 inhibitors are now a standard-of-care option for first- and second-line HR+HER2- metastatic breast cancer, resistance inevitably limits their clinical benefit.

AREAS COVERED

Early pan-CDK inhibitors targeted the cell cycle and RNA polymerase II phosphorylation, but were complicated by toxicity, providing a rationale and need for the development of selective CDK inhibitors. In this review, we highlight selected recent literature to provide a narrative review summarizing the current CDK inhibitor therapeutic landscape. We detail the challenges associated with targeting CDKs for the treatment of breast and other cancers and review emerging biomarkers that may aid response prediction. We also discuss the risk-benefit ratio for CDK therapy and explore promising combination approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

Although CDK inhibitors may stem the proliferation of cancer cells, resistance remains an issue, and currently there are limited biomarkers to predict response to therapy. Ongoing research investigating CDK inhibitors in cancer is of paramount importance to define appropriate and effective treatment regimens.

Clinical Outcomes With Abemaciclib After Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitor Progression in Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Experience

BACKGROUND

Inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6i) are widely used as first-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer (HR+ MBC). Although abemaciclib monotherapy is also FDA-approved for treatment of disease progression on endocrine therapy, there is limited insight into the clinical activity of abemaciclib after progression on prior CDK4/6i.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified patients with HR+ MBC from 6 cancer centers in the United States who received abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i, and abstracted clinical features, outcomes, toxicity, and predictive biomarkers.

RESULTS

In the multicenter cohort, abemaciclib was well tolerated after a prior course of CDK4/6i (palbociclib)-based therapy; a minority of patients discontinued abemaciclib because of toxicity without progression (9.2%). After progression on palbociclib, most patients (71.3%) received nonsequential therapy with abemaciclib (with ≥1 intervening non-CDK4/6i regimens), with most receiving abemaciclib with an antiestrogen agent (fulvestrant, 47.1%; aromatase inhibitor, 27.6%), and the remainder receiving abemaciclib monotherapy (19.5%). Median progression-free survival for abemaciclib in this population was 5.3 months and median overall survival was 17.2 months, notably similar to results obtained in the MONARCH-1 study of abemaciclib monotherapy in heavily pretreated HR+/HER2-negative CDK4/6i-naïve patients. A total of 36.8% of patients received abemaciclib for ≥6 months. There was no relationship between the duration of clinical benefit while on palbociclib and the subsequent duration of treatment with abemaciclib. RB1, ERBB2, and CCNE1 alterations were noted among patients with rapid progression on abemaciclib.

CONCLUSIONS

A subset of patients with HR+ MBC continue to derive clinical benefit from abemaciclib after progression on prior palbociclib. These results highlight the need for future studies to confirm molecular predictors of cross-resistance to CDK4/6i therapy and to better characterize the utility of abemaciclib after disease progression on prior CDK4/6i.

Inhibition of organic cation transporter 3 activity by tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Organic cation transporter (OCT) 3 (SLC22A3) is a widely expressed drug transporter, handling notably metformin and platinum derivatives, as well as endogenous compounds like monoamine neurotransmitters. OCT3 has been shown to be inhibited by a few marketed tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The present study was designed to determine whether additional TKIs may interact with OCT3. For this purpose, the effects of 25 TKIs toward OCT3 activity were analyzed using OCT3-overexpressing HEK293 cells. 13/25 TKIs, each used at 10 µM, were found to behave as moderate or strong inhibitors of OCT3 activity, that is, they decreased OCT3-mediated uptake of the fluorescent dye 4-(4-(dimethylamino)styryl)-N-methylpyridinium iodide by at least 50% or 80%, respectively. This OCT3 inhibition was correlated to some molecular descriptors of TKIs, such as the percentage of H atoms and that of cationic forms at pH = 7.4. It was concentration-dependent, notably for brigatinib, ceritinib, and crizotinib, which exhibited low half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀ ) values in the 28-106 nM range. Clinical concentrations of these three marketed TKIs, as well as those of pacritinib, were next predicted to inhibit in vivo OCT3 activity according to regulatory criteria. Cellular TKI accumulation experiments as well as trans-stimulation assays, however, demonstrated that OCT3 does not transport brigatinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, and pacritinib, thus discarding any implication of OCT3 in the pharmacokinetics of these TKIs. Taken together, these data suggest that some TKIs may act as potent inhibitors of OCT3 activity, which may have consequences in terms of drug-drug interactions and toxicity.

Serum concentration of the CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib, but not of creatinine, strongly predicts hematological adverse events in patients with breast cancer: a preliminary report

Purpose The CKD4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib is related to adverse events such as hematological toxicity and increase in serum creatinine levels associated with abemaciclib pharmacokinetics. Increase in serum creatinine levels is considered a result of competition with abemaciclib via organic cation transporter 2 and multidrug and toxic compound extrusion. Therefore, we evaluated the association among serum creatinine levels, serum abemaciclib concentrations, and adverse events and whether increase in serum creatinine levels is a useful indicator for predicting the onset of the adverse events of abemaciclib. Methods In total, the data of 12 patients with breast cancer who were treated with abemaciclib (150 mg twice daily) were evaluated to determine the association between increased serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Results Grade 3 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were observed at 4 weeks in four (33%), two (17%), and one (8%) patients, respectively. A significant association was observed between steady-state abemaciclib concentrations and the rate of decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts (r = - 0.80, P = 0.003 and r = - 0.70, P = 0.016, respectively). Compared with baseline levels (0.61 [0.53-0.82] mg/mL), serum creatinine levels significantly increased and reached a steady state in at least 2 weeks (0.84 [0.61-1.02] mg/mL, P = 0.01). However, we did not find a significant association between increase in serum creatinine levels and abemaciclib concentrations and hematological toxicity. Conclusions Abemaciclib concentrations are associated with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. However, increase in serum creatinine levels may not be a useful predictor for estimating abemaciclib pharmacokinetics and hematological toxicity.

Management of Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety Analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3

BACKGROUND

Abemaciclib demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Here we provide a comprehensive summary of the most common adverse events (AEs), their management, and whether AEs or dose reductions influenced progression-free survival (PFS), in the MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidence of the most clinically relevant AEs, management, and outcomes were summarized. Time-dependent covariate analyses examined the impact of dose reductions on PFS. PFS was estimated for patients with and without early onset of diarrhea or neutropenia.

RESULTS

The most frequently reported AE was diarrhea, with clinically significant diarrhea (grade ≥2) reported for 42.8% of patients taking abemaciclib. Median time to onset was 1 week, and duration ranged from 6 to 12 days, depending on grade and study. Diarrhea was adequately managed by antidiarrheal medication (72.8%), dose omissions (17.3%), and reductions (16.7%). The highest rates of grade ≥2 diarrhea were observed in the first cycles and decreased in subsequent cycles. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 25.4% of abemaciclib-treated patients. Neutropenia resolved with dose omissions (16.8%) and/or dose reductions (11.2%). Incidence of febrile neutropenia (0.7%) or other relevant grade ≥3 hematological events (<9%) was low. Venous thromboembolic events (5.3%) were primarily treated with anticoagulants. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.4%) was treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. PFS benefit of abemaciclib was not impacted by dose reductions or early onset of toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Abemaciclib was generally well tolerated. The most common AEs were effectively managed by supportive medications, and/or dose adjustments, with no detriment to PFS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant or nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors is generally well tolerated in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3, any-grade diarrhea and grade ≥3 neutropenia were effectively managed with supportive medication and/or dose adjustment. Venous thromboembolic events were treated with anticoagulants and did not often require treatment discontinuation. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was infrequent and treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of and implement management strategies, including dose adjustments according to local labels, for commonly occurring and serious adverse events to ensure continued treatment and optimize clinical benefit/risk ratio.

Management of Abemaciclib-Associated Adverse Events in Patients with Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Safety Analysis of MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3

BACKGROUND

Abemaciclib demonstrated efficacy in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Here we provide a comprehensive summary of the most common adverse events (AEs), their management, and whether AEs or dose reductions influenced progression-free survival (PFS), in the MONARCH 2 and 3 trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidence of the most clinically relevant AEs, management, and outcomes were summarized. Time-dependent covariate analyses examined the impact of dose reductions on PFS. PFS was estimated for patients with and without early onset of diarrhea or neutropenia.

RESULTS

The most frequently reported AE was diarrhea, with clinically significant diarrhea (grade ≥2) reported for 42.8% of patients taking abemaciclib. Median time to onset was 1 week, and duration ranged from 6 to 12 days, depending on grade and study. Diarrhea was adequately managed by antidiarrheal medication (72.8%), dose omissions (17.3%), and reductions (16.7%). The highest rates of grade ≥2 diarrhea were observed in the first cycles and decreased in subsequent cycles. Neutropenia (grade ≥3) occurred in 25.4% of abemaciclib-treated patients. Neutropenia resolved with dose omissions (16.8%) and/or dose reductions (11.2%). Incidence of febrile neutropenia (0.7%) or other relevant grade ≥3 hematological events (<9%) was low. Venous thromboembolic events (5.3%) were primarily treated with anticoagulants. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis (3.4%) was treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. PFS benefit of abemaciclib was not impacted by dose reductions or early onset of toxicities.

CONCLUSION

Abemaciclib was generally well tolerated. The most common AEs were effectively managed by supportive medications, and/or dose adjustments, with no detriment to PFS.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Treatment with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant or nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors is generally well tolerated in patients with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. In MONARCH 2 and MONARCH 3, any-grade diarrhea and grade ≥3 neutropenia were effectively managed with supportive medication and/or dose adjustment. Venous thromboembolic events were treated with anticoagulants and did not often require treatment discontinuation. Interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis was infrequent and treated with corticosteroids and/or antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of and implement management strategies, including dose adjustments according to local labels, for commonly occurring and serious adverse events to ensure continued treatment and optimize clinical benefit/risk ratio.

Drug dosing in cancer patients with decreased kidney function: A practical approach

Correct drug dosing of anticancer agents is essential to obtain optimal outcomes. Overdosing will result in increased toxicity, treatment interruption and possible cessation of anticancer treatment. Underdosing may result in suboptimal anti-cancer effects and may increase the risk of cancer-related mortality. As it is practical nor feasible to perform therapeutic drug monitoring for all anti-cancer drugs, kidney function is used to guide drug dosing for those drugs whose primary mode of excretion is through the kidney. However, it is not well-established what method should be utilized to measure or estimate kidney function and the choice of method does influence treatment decisions regarding eligibility for anti-cancer drugs and their dose. In this review, we will provide an overview regarding the importance of drug dosing, the preferred method to determine kidney function and a practical approach to drug dosing of anticancer drugs.

A real or apparent decrease in glomerular filtration rate in patients using olaparib?

Purpose

Olaparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor indicated for ovarian and metastatic breast cancer. Increased serum creatinine levels have been observed in patients taking olaparib, but the underlying mechanism is unknown. This study aimed to investigate if patients receiving olaparib have increased creatinine levels during olaparib treatment and whether this actually relates to a declined glomerular filtration rate (GFR).

Methods

We retrospectively identified patients using olaparib at the Netherlands Cancer Institute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek (NKI-AVL) from 2012 until 2020. Patients with at least one plasma or serum sample available at baseline/off treatment and during olaparib treatment were included. Cystatin C levels were measured, creatinine levels were available and renal function was determined by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Creatinine Equation (CKD-EPI 2009) and the Cystatin C Equation (CKD-EPI 2012).

Results

In total, 66 patients were included. Olaparib treatment was associated with a 14% increase in median creatinine from 72 (inter quartile range (IQR): 22) μmol/L before/off treatment to 82 (IQR: 20) μmol/L during treatment (p < 0.001) and a 13% decrease in median creatinine-derived eGFR from 86 (IQR: 26) mL/min/1.73 m² before/off treatment to 75 (IQR: 29) mL/min/1.73 m² during treatment (p < 0.001). Olaparib treatment had no significant effect on median cystatin C levels (p = 0.520) and the median cystatin C–derived eGFR (p = 0.918).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that olaparib likely causes inhibition of renal transporters leading to a reversible and dose-dependent increase in creatinine and does not affect GFR, since the median cystatin C–derived eGFR was comparable before/off treatment and during treatment of olaparib. Using the creatinine-derived eGFR can give an underestimation of GFR in patients taking olaparib. Therefore, an alternative renal marker such as cystatin C should be used to accurately calculate eGFR in patients taking olaparib.