A Quantitative Framework to Evaluate Proarrhythmic Risk in a First-in-Human Study to Support Waiver of a Thorough QT Study

Concentration-QTc Modeling of the DPP-4 Inhibitor HSK7653 in a First-in-Human Study of Chinese Healthy Volunteers

Cofrogliptin (HSK7653) is a long-acting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with a twice-monthly dosing regimen. This study included 62 participants (48 without food effect, 14 with food effect) receiving single doses of HSK7653 (5, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 150 mg) or placebo. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected over 24 hours postdosing and sampling times are aligned with 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) which were derived from continuous ECG recordings. For the concentration-QT interval corrected for heart rate (C-QTc) analysis, we used linear mixed-effects modeling to characterize the correlation between plasma concentrations of HSK7653 and the change from baseline in the QT interval which was corrected by Fridericia's formula (ΔQTcF). The result showed that a placebo-corrected Fridericia corrected QT interval (ΔΔQTcF) prolongation higher than 10 milliseconds is unlikely at the mean maximum observed concentration (Cmax) (411 ng/mL) associated with the recommended therapeutic doses (25 mg twice-monthly), even at the highest supratherapeutic concentration (2425 ng/mL). Thus, HSK7653 does not significantly affect QT prolongation at either recommended doses or the highest supratherapeutic concentration.

Exposure-Response Analysis to Assess the Concentration-QTc Relationship of Iberdomide

Iberdomide is an orally available cereblon-modulating agent being developed for the treatment of hematologic malignancies and autoimmune-mediated diseases. To assess the potential concentration-QTc relationship in humans and to ascertain or exclude a potential QT effect by iberdomide, a plasma concentration and ΔQTcF (change from baseline of corrected QT interval using the Fridericia formula) model of iberdomide was developed. Iberdomide concentration and paired high-quality, intensive electrocardiogram signal from a single-ascending-dose study in healthy subjects (N = 56) were included in the analysis. The primary analysis was based on a linear mixed-effect model with ΔQTcF as the dependent variable; iberdomide plasma concentration and baseline QTcF as continuous covariates; treatment (active or placebo) and time as a categorical factor; and a random intercept per subject. The predicted change from baseline and placebo corrected (ΔΔQTcF) at the observed geometric mean maximum plasma concentration and 2-sided 90% confidence intervals at different dose levels were calculated. The upper bound of the 90% confidence interval of the model-predicted ΔΔQTcF effect at maximum concentration from the supratherapeutic dose of 6 mg (2.54 milliseconds) is <10-millisecond threshold, suggesting that iberdomide does not have a clinically relevant QT prolongation liability.

ECG Evaluation as Part of the Clinical Pharmacology Strategy in the Development of New Drugs: A Review of Current Practices and Opportunities Based on Five Case Studies

The International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) E14 document was revised in 2015 to allow concentration-corrected QT interval (C-QTc) analysis to be applied to data from early clinical pharmacology studies to exclude a small drug-induced effect on QTc. Provided sufficiently high concentrations of the drug are obtained in the first-in-human (FIH) study, this approach can be used to obviate the need for a designated thorough QT (TQT) study. The E14 revision has resulted in a steady reduction in the number of TQT studies and an increased use of FIH studies to evaluate electrocardiogram (ECG) effects of drugs in development. In this review, five examples from different sponsors are shared in which C-QTc analysis was performed on data from FIH studies. Case 1 illustrates a clearly negative C-QTc evaluation, despite observations of QTc prolongation at high concentrations in nonclinical studies. In case 2 C-QTc analysis of FIH data was performed prior to full pharmacokinetic characterization in patients, and the role of nonclinical assays in an integrated risk assessment is discussed. Case 3 illustrates a positive clinical C-QTc relationship, despite negative nonclinical assays. Case 4 demonstrates a strategy for characterizing the C-QTc relationship for a nonracemic therapy and formulation optimization, and case 5 highlights an approach to perform a preliminary C-QTc analysis early in development and postpone the definitive analysis until proof of efficacy is demonstrated. The strategy of collecting and storing ECG data from FIH studies to enable an informed decision on whether and when to apply C-QTc analysis to obviate the need for a TQT study is described.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of HM15136, a novel long-acting glucagon analogue, in healthy subjects

AIM

To evaluate the safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of HM15136, a novel long-acting glucagon analogue under development, in healthy males and females presenting with no childbearing potential.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-ascending dose study was conducted in 56 subjects who randomly received a single subcutaneous dose of HM15136 or its matching placebo at a ratio of 6:2 at 10, 20, 30, 50, 80, 100, and 120 μg/kg.

RESULTS

All adverse events were mild and transient. Neither serious adverse events nor discontinuation as a result of adverse events occurred. The most frequent adverse drug reaction was nausea (5.3%, only in the 100- and 120-μg/kg groups). HM15136, particularly at doses of 50 μg/kg or higher, increased fasting blood glucose, with a maximum increase and area under the curve of 1.5 mmol/L at day 10 (P = .006) and 166.3 day·mmol/L (P = .022) at the dose of 80 μg/kg, while suppressing the secretion of endogenous glucagon, which continued until day 17. HM15136 also significantly reduced gluconeogenic and ketogenic amino acids. Compensatory changes in endogenous insulin and incretin hormones by HM15136 were not apparent. HM15136 was slowly but steadily absorbed and reached a peak concentration at 46-68 hours after a single subcutaneous injection. HM15136 was eliminated with a terminal phase half-life of 77.1-101.1 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

A single subcutaneous dose of HM15136 at 10-120 μg/kg was safe and well tolerated. The long half-life of HM15136, coupled with an increase in blood glucose for ~2 weeks, may warrant a weekly dosing regimen.

Exposure-response analysis of adverse events associated with molibresib and its active metabolites in patients with solid tumors

Molibresib (GSK525762) is an investigational orally bioavailable small‐molecule bromodomain and extraterminal (BET) protein inhibitor for the treatment of advanced solid tumors. In the first‐time‐in‐human BET115521 study of molibresib in patients with solid tumors, thrombocytopenia was the most frequent treatment‐related adverse event (AE), QT prolongation was an AE of special interest based on preclinical signals, and gastrointestinal (GI) AEs (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and dysgeusia) were often observed. The aims of this analysis were the following: (i) develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model capable of predicting platelet time courses in individual patients after administration of molibresib and identify covariates of clinical interest; (ii) evaluate the effects of molibresib (and/or its two active metabolites [GSK3529246]) exposure on cardiac repolarization by applying a systematic modeling approach using high‐quality, intensive, PK time‐matched 12‐lead electrocardiogram measurements; (iii) evaluate the exposure–response (ER) relationship between molibresib and/or GSK3529246 exposures and the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher GI AEs. Overall, the PK/PD model (including a maximal drug effect model and molibresib concentration) adequately described platelet counts following molibresib treatment and was used to simulate the impact of molibresib dosing on thrombocytopenia at different doses and regimens. ER analyses showed no clinically meaningful QT interval prolongation with molibresib at up to 100 mg q.d., and no strong correlation between molibresib exposure and the occurrence of Grade 2 or higher GI AEs. The models described here can aid dosing/schedule and drug combination strategies and may support a thorough QT study waiver request for molibresib.

Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Selonsertib, an Apoptosis Signal-Regulating Kinase 1 (ASK1) Inhibitor, Following First-in-Human Single and Multiple Ascending Doses in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND

Selonsertib is a first-in-class inhibitor of apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 (ASK1) with therapeutic potential for fibrotic diseases. This phase I study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and food effect of selonsertib in healthy subjects.

METHODS

This was a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled dose-escalation study. Healthy subjects received 1, 3, 10, 30, or 100 mg of selonsertib or placebo as single or multiple doses once daily for 14 days in the fasted state, or 30 mg or placebo single dose in the fed state. Blood and urine (single-dose cohorts only) samples for selonsertib PK were collected and safety was assessed throughout the study. Ex vivo pharmacodynamic (PD) assessment was performed in blood from a separate cohort of healthy donors using an auranofin-stimulated C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 1 (CXCL1) assay.

RESULTS

Overall, 107 subjects (83 active, 24 placebo) were enrolled and randomized to 11 cohorts. Selonsertib was generally well tolerated; adverse events were generally mild to moderate. Selonsertib was rapidly absorbed with dose-proportional PK of both parent and inactive metabolite GS-607509. There was no food effect on selonsertib PK. Renal excretion was a minor pathway of selonsertib elimination. Selonsertib half maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀) in human whole blood was determined to be 56 ng/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Selonsertib exhibited a favorable PK profile amenable to once-daily dosing without regard to food. PD data suggest pharmacologically relevant exposures were achieved in the dose range evaluated. Study results support further clinical development of selonsertib.

Evaluation of the Effect of Contezolid (MRX-I) on the Corrected QT Interval in a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo- and Positive-Controlled Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers

Contezolid (MRX-I), a new oxazolidinone, is an antibiotic in development for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by resistant Gram-positive bacteria. This was a thorough QT study conducted in 52 healthy subjects who were administered oral contezolid at a therapeutic (800 mg) dose, a supratherapeutic (1,600 mg) dose, placebo, and oral moxifloxacin at 400 mg in four separate treatment periods. The pharmacokinetic profile of contezolid was also evaluated. Time point analysis indicated that the upper bounds of the two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) for placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QTc (ΔΔQTc) were <10 ms for the contezolid therapeutic dose at each time point. The upper bound of the 90% CI for ΔΔQTc was slightly more than 10 ms with the contezolid supratherapeutic dose at 3 and 4 h postdose, and the prolongation effect on the QT/QTc interval was less than that of the positive control, moxifloxacin, at 400 mg. At 3 and 4 h after the moxifloxacin dose, the moxifloxacin group met the assay sensitivity criteria outlined in ICH Guidance E14 by having a lower confidence bound of ≥5 ms. The results of a linear exposure-response model which were similar to that of a time point analysis demonstrated a slightly positive relationship between contezolid plasma levels and ΔQTcF interval with a slope of 0.227 ms per mg/liter (90% CI, 0.188 to 0.266). In summary, contezolid did not prolong the QT interval at a therapeutic dose and may have a slight effect on QT interval prolongation at a supratherapeutic dose.

Safety and Pharmacokinetic Characterization of Nacubactam, a Novel β-Lactamase Inhibitor, Alone and in Combination with Meropenem, in Healthy Volunteers

Nacubactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with dual mechanisms of action as an inhibitor of serine β-lactamases (classes A and C and some class D) and an inhibitor of penicillin binding protein 2 in Enterobacteriaceae. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous nacubactam were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose, placebo-controlled studies. Healthy participants received single ascending doses of nacubactam of 50 to 8,000 mg, multiple ascending doses of nacubactam of 1,000 to 4,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) for up to 7 days, or nacubactam of 2,000 mg plus meropenem of 2,000 mg q8h for 6 days after a 3-day lead-in period.

Nacubactam is a novel β-lactamase inhibitor with dual mechanisms of action as an inhibitor of serine β-lactamases (classes A and C and some class D) and an inhibitor of penicillin binding protein 2 in Enterobacteriaceae. The safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous nacubactam were evaluated in single- and multiple-ascending-dose, placebo-controlled studies. Healthy participants received single ascending doses of nacubactam of 50 to 8,000 mg, multiple ascending doses of nacubactam of 1,000 to 4,000 mg every 8 h (q8h) for up to 7 days, or nacubactam of 2,000 mg plus meropenem of 2,000 mg q8h for 6 days after a 3-day lead-in period. Nacubactam was generally well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) being mild to moderate complications associated with intravenous access and headache. There was no apparent relationship between drug dose and the pattern, incidence, or severity of AEs. No clinically relevant dose-related trends were observed in laboratory safety test results. No serious AEs, dose-limiting AEs, or deaths were reported. After single or multiple doses, nacubactam pharmacokinetics appeared linear, and exposure increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner across the dose range investigated. Nacubactam was excreted largely unchanged into urine. Coadministration of nacubactam with meropenem did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of either drug. These findings support the continued clinical development of nacubactam and demonstrate the suitability of meropenem as a potential β-lactam partner for nacubactam. (The studies described in this paper have been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT02134834 [single ascending dose study] and NCT02972255 [multiple ascending dose study].)

First-in-Human, Healthy Volunteers Integrated Protocol of ETC-206, an Oral Mnk 1/2 Kinase Inhibitor Oncology Drug

In the last decade, drug development has tackled substantial challenges to improve efficiency and facilitate access to innovative medicines. Integrated clinical protocols and the investigation of targeted oncology drugs in healthy volunteers (HVs) have emerged as modalities with an increase in scope and complexity of early clinical studies and first‐in‐human (FIH) studies in particular. However, limited work has been done to explore the impact of these two modalities, alone or in combination, on the scientific value and on the implementation of such articulated studies. We conducted an FIH study in HVs with an oncology targeted drug, an Mnk 1/2 small molecule inhibitor. In this article, we describe results, advantages, and limitations of an integrated clinical protocol with an oncology drug. We further discuss and indicate points to consider when designing and conducting similar scientifically and operationally demanding FIH studies.

Concentration-response modeling of ECG data from early-phase clinical studies to assess QT prolongation risk of contezolid (MRX-I), an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent

The effects of contezolid (MRX-I, an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent) on cardiac repolarization were evaluated retrospectively using a population modeling approach in a Phase I study incorporating single ascending dose, multiple ascending dose, and food effect assessments. Linear mixed effect models were used to assess the relationships between MRX-I plasma concentrations and QT/QTc/∆QTc (baseline-adjusted), in which different correction methods for heart rate have been included. The upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) for predicted ∆∆QTc was < 10 ms (ms) at therapeutic doses of MRX-I. Model performance/suitability was determined using diagnostic evaluations, which indicated rationality of one-stage concentration-QT model, as well as C-QT model suggested by Garnett et al. The finding demonstrated that MRX-I may have no clinical effects on the QT interval. Concentration-QT model may be an alternative to conventional thorough QT studies.

Challenges in implementing and obtaining acceptance for J-Tpeak assessment as the clinical component of CiPA

INTRODUCTION

This paper is based on a presentation held at the Annual Safety Pharmacology Society meeting in September 2017, at which challenges for the clinical component of CiPA were presented. FDA has published an automated algorithm for measurement of the J-Tpeak interval on a median beat from a vector magnitude lead derived from a 12-lead ECG. CiPA proposes that J-Tpeak prolongation < 10 ms can be used for drugs with a QTc effect < 20 ms to differentiate between safe and unsafe delayed repolarization and to reduce the level of ECG monitoring in late stage clinical trials.

METHODS

We applied FDA's algorithm, complemented with iCOMPAS, to moxifloxacin and dolasetron data from the IQ-CSRC study with 9 subjects on active and 6 on placebo. The effect on QTcF and corrected J-Tpeak (J-Tpeak_c) was analyzed using concentration-effect modeling.

RESULTS

There was a good correlation between QTcF and J-Tpeak_c prolongation after oral dosing of 400 mg moxifloxacin with placebo-adjusted, change-from-baseline (ΔΔ) J-Tpeak_c of ~12 ms at concentrations that caused ΔΔQTcF of ~20 ms. On dolasetron, J-Tpeak_c was highly variable, no prolongation was seen and an effect on ΔΔJ-Tpeak_c > 10 ms could be excluded across the observed plasma concentration range.

DISCUSSION

In this limited analysis performed on the IQ-CSRC study waveforms using FDA's automated algorithm, J-Tpeak prolongation was observed on moxifloxacin, but not on dolasetron, despite clinical observations of proarrhythmias with both drugs. Challenges for the implementation of the J-Tpeak interval as a replacement or complement to the QTc interval, include to demonstrate that the proposed clinical algorithm using a J-Tpeak threshold of 10 ms, can be used to categorize drugs with a QT effect up to ~20 ms as having low pro-arrhythmic risk.

Drug-induced Proarrhythmia and Torsade de Pointes: A Primer for Students and Practitioners of Medicine and Pharmacy

Multiple marketing withdrawals due to proarrhythmic concerns occurred in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom in the late 1980s to early 2000s. This primer reviews the clinical implications of a drug's identified proarrhythmic liability, the issues associated with these safety-related withdrawals, and the actions taken by the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) and by regulatory agencies in terms of changing drug development practices and introducing new nonclinical and clinical tests to asses proarrhythmic liability. ICH Guidelines S7B and E14 were released in 2005. Since then, they have been adopted by many regional regulatory authorities and have guided nonclinical and clinical proarrhythmic cardiac safety assessments during drug development. While this regulatory paradigm has been successful in preventing drugs with unanticipated potential for inducing the rare but potentially fatal polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia torsade de pointes from entering the market, it has led to the termination of drug development programs for other potentially useful medicines because of isolated results from studies with limited predictive value. Research efforts are now exploring alternative approaches to better predict potential proarrhythmic liabilities. For example, in the domain of human electrocardiographic assessments, concentration-response modeling conducted during phase 1 clinical development has recently become an accepted alternate primary methodology to the ICH E14 "thorough QT/QTc" study for defining a drug's corrected QT interval prolongation liability under certain conditions. When a drug's therapeutic benefit is considered important at a public health level but there is also an identified proarrhythmic liability that may result from administration of the single drug in certain individuals and/or drug-drug interactions, marketing approval will be accompanied by appropriate directions in the drug's prescribing information. Health-care professionals in the fields of medicine and pharmacy need to consider the prescribing information in conjunction with individual patients' clinical characteristics and concomitant medications when prescribing and dispensing such drugs.

Evaluating cardiac risk: exposure response analysis in early clinical drug development

The assessment of a drug's cardiac liability has undergone considerable metamorphosis by regulators since International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirement for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use E14 guideline was introduced in 2005. Drug developers now have a choice in how proarrhythmia risk can be evaluated; the options include a dedicated thorough QT (TQT) study or exposure response (ER) modeling of intensive electrocardiogram (ECG) captured in early clinical development. The alternative approach of ER modeling was incorporated into a guidance document in 2015 as a primary analysis tool which could be utilized in early phase dose escalation studies as an option to perform a dedicated TQT trial. This review will describe the current state of ER modeling of intensive ECG data collected during early clinical drug development; the requirements with regard to the use of a positive control; and address the challenges and opportunities of this alternative approach to assessing QT liability.

Assessing QT/QTc interval prolongation with concentration-QT modeling for Phase I studies: impact of computational platforms, model structures and confidence interval calculation methods

Modeling the relationship between drug concentrations and heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) change from baseline (C-∆QTc), based on Phase I single ascending dose (SAD) or multiple ascending dose (MAD) studies, has been proposed as an alternative to thorough QT studies (TQT), in assessing drug-induced QT prolongation risk. The present analysis used clinical SAD, MAD and TQT study data of an experimental compound, AZD5672, to evaluate the performance of: (i) three computational platforms (linear mixed-effects modeling implemented via PROC MIXED in SAS, as well as in R using LME4 package and linear quantile mixed models (LQMM) implemented via LQMM package; (ii) different model structures with and without treatment- or time-specific intercepts; and (iii) three methods for calculating the confidence interval (CI) of QTc prolongation (analytical and bootstrap methods with fixed or varied geometric mean concentrations). We show that treatment- and time-specific intercepts may need to be included into C-∆QTc modeling through PROC MIXED or LME4, regardless of their statistical significance. With the intersection union test (IUT) in the TQT study as a reference for comparison, inclusion of these intercepts increased the feasibility for C-∆QTc modelling of SAD or MAD to reach the same conclusion as the IUT analysis based on TQT study. Compared to PROC MIXED or LME4, the LQMM method is less dependent on inclusion of treatment- or time-specific intercepts, and the bootstrap CI calculation methods provided higher likelihood for C-∆QTc modeling of SAD and MAD studies to reach the same conclusion as the IUT based on the TQT study.

Evaluating Potential QT Effects of JNJ-54861911, a BACE Inhibitor in Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose Studies, and a Thorough QT Trial With Additional Retrospective Confirmation, Using Concentration-QTc Analysis

Nonclinical assays with JNJ-54861911, a β-secretase 1 inhibitor have indicated that at high concentrations, it may delay cardiac repolarization. A 4-way crossover thorough QT (TQT) study was performed in 64 healthy subjects with 50 and 150 mg JNJ-54861911 once daily for 7 days, placebo, and 400 mg moxifloxacin. Retrospective high-precision QT (HPQT) analysis was performed on serial elecrocardiograms extracted from first-in-human single-ascending dose (SAD) and multiple-ascending dose (MAD) studies to evaluate if early studies could detect and predict QT effect. In the TQT study, a high therapeutic 50 mg dose did not cause QT prolongation, and an effect >10 milliseconds could be excluded at all postdose timepoints. QT prolongation with peak effect on placebo-corrected change from baseline QTcF of 15.5 milliseconds (90%CI, 12.9-18.1 milliseconds) was observed following a supratherapeutic dose (150 mg). No clinically relevant QT changes were observed in earlier studies. However, with SAD/MAD findings by HPQT, the slope of the exposure-response (ER) relationship in the SAD study (doses up to 150 mg) was similar to the TQT study slope, and the estimated QT effect was comparable at high plasma levels. In the MAD study, doses up to 90 mg once daily for 7 days resulted in JNJ-54861911 peak plasma concentrations (C_max ) comparable to those in the SAD study (∼750 ng/mL), but ER by HPQT failed to detect a QT effect and resulted in negative estimations. Adding a higher dose cohort (150 mg; C_max , 1125 ng/mL) demonstrated a QT effect, with a slightly lower ER slope than the TQT study. JNJ-54861911 (up to 50 mg) did not cause QT prolongation at clinically relevant plasma concentrations in any studies. Provided sufficiently high plasma concentrations were captured, mild QT prolongation observed postdose with a supratherapeutic dose could be detected (TQT study) and estimated in SAD/MAD studies. Based on population pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation, 5 and 25 mg doses are currently considered for further phase 3 studies and are expected not to cause any relevant QT prolongation.

Study Design Parameters Affecting Exposure Response Analysis of QT Data: Results From Simulation Studies

The operating characteristics of dose-escalating studies in terms of false-negative predictions of the QT effect and the power to exclude clinically relevant QT effects are not quantitatively established. One thousand single-ascending-dose (SAD) studies with 7 dose groups with 6/2 subjects on active drug/placebo were generated through simulation for each of 32 scenarios with (1) 8 different QT effects of the study drug and (2) achieved plasma concentration 2- or 4-fold above therapeutic levels. For each subject, drug-free QT data from a thorough QT study were subsampled to capture the circadian profile, on which a drug effect was added. The percentage of false-negative studies was between 4% and 9% when the drug's QT effect was set to 10 milliseconds. If a somewhat lower effect of 6.7 milliseconds was set at therapeutic concentrations, the fraction of negative studies was higher, 40% to 60% when the variability of the QT data was well controlled. When the QT effect was set to 5 milliseconds at therapeutic plasma concentrations, the power of SAD studies to exclude 10 milliseconds QT effect was generally above 70% (74% to 94%) with well-controlled QT variability, whereas the power was reduced to 36% to 69% if supratherapeutic plasma concentrations were not achieved. The rate of false-negative studies was acceptably low in placebo-controlled SAD studies. With a drug with no or a small QT effect, supratherapeutic plasma concentrations, and well-controlled variability of QT data, the power of SAD studies to exclude a relevant effect was above 70%.

Mechanistic Model-Informed Proarrhythmic Risk Assessment of Drugs: Review of the "CiPA" Initiative and Design of a Prospective Clinical Validation Study

The Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative is developing and validating a mechanistic-based assessment of the proarrhythmic risk of drugs. CiPA proposes to assess a drug's effect on multiple ion channels and integrate the effects in a computer model of the human cardiomyocyte to predict proarrhythmic risk. Unanticipated or missed effects will be assessed with human stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes and electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis in early phase I clinical trials. This article provides an overview of CiPA and the rationale and design of the CiPA phase I ECG validation clinical trial, which involves assessing an additional ECG biomarker (J-Tpeak) for QT prolonging drugs. If successful, CiPA will 1) create a pathway for drugs with hERG block / QT prolongation to advance without intensive ECG monitoring in phase III trials if they have low proarrhythmic risk; and 2) enable updating drug labels to be more informative about proarrhythmic risk, not just QT prolongation.

Intravenous Dosing as an Alternate Approach to Safely Achieve Supratherapeutic Exposure for Assessments of Cardiac Repolarization: A Randomized Clinical Trial with Mavoglurant (AFQ056)

PURPOSE

The conduct of thorough QTc (TQT) studies is often challenging with compounds that are characterized by limited tolerability in healthy individuals. This is applicable to several central nervous system drugs, including mavoglurant acting as a selective allosteric modulator of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5. This TQT study describes the use of a single intravenous dosing regimen as an alternate approach allowing for sufficiently high C_max values while controlling tolerability.

METHODS

This study was a randomized, placebo- and active-controlled, 4-period, crossover, TQT study composed of 2 sequential phases. In the pilot phase, the safety and tolerability profile of 10-minute infusions of 25, 37.5, and 50 mg of mavoglurant was assessed in 36 healthy individuals. In the TQT phase, individuals received in random sequence single intravenous doses of mavoglurant (25 and 50 mg) and placebo and an oral dose of moxifloxacin (400 mg).

FINDINGS

Mavoglurant was well tolerated up to a single intravenous dose of 50 mg, and supratherapeutic C_max values were achieved that were approximately 2-fold higher than at the multiple maximum tolerated dose and more than 3-fold higher relative to therapeutic plasma concentrations. The upper bound of the 2-sided 90% CI of Fridericia-corrected placebo- and baseline-adjusted QTc intervals (QTcFs) did not exceed 10 milliseconds at any postdose time point for both mavoglurant doses. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis confirmed the lack of an association between mavoglurant plasma concentrations and ΔΔQTcF data over the entire range of plasma concentration data at 25 and 50 mg of mavoglurant. An outlier analysis revealed no individuals with newly identified QTcF intervals >480 milliseconds or any QTcF prolongations >60 milliseconds compared with baseline in any of the treatment groups. Hence, the lack of any clinically relevant QTc prolongation was found for therapeutic and supratherapeutic single intravenous doses of 25 and 50 mg of mavoglurant.

IMPLICATIONS

This TQT study describes the use of single intravenous dosing as an alternate approach to achieve supratherapeutic plasma concentrations as required per the International Council for Harmonisation E14 guideline with compounds characterized by exposure related tolerability limitations. The increased C_max/AUC ratio compared with conventional oral dosing may contribute to a reduced incidence of adverse events that appear more related to overall exposure.

Evolving regulatory paradigm for proarrhythmic risk assessment for new drugs

Fourteen drugs were removed from the market worldwide because their potential to cause torsade de pointes (torsade), a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia. The observation that most drugs that cause torsade block the potassium channel encoded by the human ether-à-go-go related gene (hERG) and prolong the heart rate corrected QT interval (QTc) on the ECG, led to a focus on screening new drugs for their potential to block the hERG potassium channel and prolong QTc. This has been a successful strategy keeping torsadogenic drugs off the market, but has resulted in drugs being dropped from development, sometimes inappropriately. This is because not all drugs that block the hERG potassium channel and prolong QTc cause torsade, sometimes because they block other channels. The regulatory paradigm is evolving to improve proarrhythmic risk prediction. ECG studies can now use exposure-response modeling for assessing the effect of a drug on the QTc in small sample size first-in-human studies. Furthermore, the Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative is developing and validating a new in vitro paradigm for cardiac safety evaluation of new drugs that provides a more accurate and comprehensive mechanistic-based assessment of proarrhythmic potential. Under CiPA, the prediction of proarrhythmic potential will come from in vitro ion channel assessments coupled with an in silico model of the human ventricular myocyte. The preclinical assessment will be checked with an assessment of human phase 1 ECG data to determine if there are unexpected ion channel effects in humans compared to preclinical ion channel data. While there is ongoing validation work, the heart rate corrected J-T_peak interval is likely to be assessed under CiPA to detect inward current block in presence of hERG potassium channel block.

Can an early phase clinical pharmacology study replace a thorough QT study? Experience with a novel H3-receptor antagonist/inverse agonist

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to compare the effects of pitolisant on QTcF interval in a single ascending dose (SAD) study and a thorough QT (TQT) study.

METHODS

The SAD study at three dose levels of pitolisant enrolled 24 males and the TQT study at two dose levels 25 males. Both studies intensively monitored ECGs and pitolisant exposure. Effect on QTcF interval was analysed by Intersection Union Test (IUT) and by exposure-response (ER) analysis. Results from the two studies were compared.

RESULTS

In both studies, moxifloxacin effect established assay sensitivity. IUT analysis revealed comparable pitolisant-induced maximum mean (90 % confidence interval (CI)) placebo-corrected increase from baseline (ΔΔQTcF) in both the studies, being 13.3 (8.1; 18.5) ms at 200-mg and 9.9 (4.7; 15.1) ms at 240-mg doses in SAD study and 5.27 (2.35; 8.20) ms at 120-mg dose in TQT study. ER analysis revealed that ER slopes in SAD and TQT studies were comparable and significantly positive (0.031 vs 0.027 ms/ng/mL, respectively). At geometric mean concentrations, bootstrap predicted ΔΔQTcF (90 % CI) were 9.23 (4.68; 14.4) ms at 279 ng/mL (240-mg dose) in the SAD study and 4.97 (3.42; 8.19) ms at 156 ng/mL (120-mg dose) in the TQT study.

CONCLUSION

Pitolisant lacked an effect of regulatory concern on QTc interval in both the studies, however analysed, suggesting that the results from the SAD study could have mitigated the need for a TQT study. Our findings add to the growing evidence that intensive ECG monitoring in early phase clinical studies can replace a TQT study.