Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Treosulfan in Patients With Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Outcomes from hematopoietic stem cell transplantation following treosulfan-based conditioning: A clinical and pharmacokinetic analysis

BACKGROUND

The aims of this study are to report our experience with treosulfan-based conditioning regimens for patients with non-malignant hematologic conditions, correlating clinical outcomes at different time points post-transplant with treosulfan exposure (AUC).

METHODS

This study was a single-center observational study investigating overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and event-free survival (EFS) end-points post-transplant. The consequences of treosulfan AUC with respect to toxicity, correction of underlying disease, and long-term chimerism were also explored using pharmacokinetic analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients received 49 transplants with treosulfan and fludarabine-based conditioning between 2005 and 2023. Twenty-four patients also received thiotepa. Donor chimerism was assessed on either whole blood or sorted cell lines at different time points post-transplant. Thirty-nine patients received treosulfan pharmacokinetic assessment to evaluate cumulative AUC, with five infants receiving real-time assessment to facilitate daily dose adjustment. OS, DFS, and EFS were 87%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. Median follow-up was 32.1 months (range 0.82-160 months) following transplant. Lower EFS was associated with patient age (<1 year; p = .057) and lower cumulative treosulfan dose (<42 g/m2; p = .003). Stable donor chimerism in B-cell, NK-cell, and granulocyte lineages at 1-year post-transplant were more prevalent in patients receiving thiotepa conditioning. Two infants required daily dose adjustment to treosulfan to avoid high AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Excellent clinical outcomes and stable chimerism were observed in this patient series. The addition of thiotepa conferred no significant toxicity and trended toward sustained ongoing donor engraftment. Correlating treosulfan AUC with long-term patient outcomes is required.

Safety and Efficacy of High-Dose Chemotherapy with TreoMel 200 vs. TreoMel 140 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

(1) Background: Treosulfan and melphalan (TreoMel)-based high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) has shown promising safety and efficacy as a conditioning regimen for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, despite intensive first-line induction treatment and upfront consolidation with HDCT and ASCT, AML relapse rates are still high, and further efforts are needed to improve patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare two melphalan dose schedules in regard to the safety of TreoMel HDCT and patient outcomes. (2) Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the safety and efficacy of two melphalan dose schedules combined with standard-dose treosulfan in AML patients undergoing HDCT and ASCT at the University Hospital of Bern, Switzerland, between August 2019 and August 2023. Patients received treosulfan 42 g/m2 combined with either melphalan 140 mg/m2 (TreoMel 140) or melphalan 200 mg/m2 (TreoMel 200). Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), as well as safety profile. (3) Results: We included a total of 51 AML patients: 31 (60.8%) received TreoMel 140 and 20 (39.2%) TreoMel 200. The patients' basal characteristics were comparable between both cohorts. No significant differences in the duration of hospitalization or the adverse event profile were identified. There were no statistically significant differences in relapse (0.45 vs. 0.30, p = 0.381) and mortality rates (0.42 vs. 0.15, p = 0.064) between the melphalan 140 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 cohorts, nor for PFS (HR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.29-2.28, p = 0.70) or OS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.19-2.57, p = 0.59) for the TreoMel 140 vs. TreoMel 200 cohort. (4) Conclusions: A higher dose of melphalan (TreoMel 200) was well tolerated overall. No statistically significant differences for patient outcomes could be observed, possibly due to the relatively small patient cohort and the short follow-up. A longer follow-up and prospective randomized studies would be required to confirm the safety profile and clinical benefit.

Treosulfan vs busulfan conditioning for allogeneic bmt in children with nonmalignant disease: a randomized phase 2 trial

Optimal conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for children with non-malignant diseases is subject of ongoing research. This prospective, randomized, phase 2 trial compared safety and efficacy of busulfan with treosulfan based preparative regimens. Children with non-malignant diseases received fludarabine and either intravenous (IV) busulfan (4.8 to 3.2 mg/kg/day) or IV treosulfan (10, 12, or 14 g/m2/day). Thiotepa administration (2 × 5 mg/kg) was at the investigator's discretion. Primary endpoint was freedom from transplantation (treatment)-related mortality (freedom from TRM), defined as death between Days -7 and +100. Overall, 101 patients (busulfan 50, treosulfan 51) with at least 12 months follow-up were analyzed. Freedom from TRM was 90.0% (95% CI: 78.2%, 96.7%) after busulfan and 100.0% (95% CI: 93.0%, 100.0%) after treosulfan. Secondary outcomes (transplantation-related mortality [12.0% versus 3.9%]) and overall survival (88.0% versus 96.1%) favored treosulfan. Graft failure was more common after treosulfan (n = 11), than after busulfan (n = 2) while all patients were rescued by second procedures except one busulfan patient. CTCAE Grade III adverse events were similar in both groups. This study confirmed treosulfan to be an excellent alternative to busulfan and can be safely used for conditioning treatment in children with non-malignant disease.

Treosulfan Exposure Predicts Thalassemia-Free Survival in Patients with Beta Thalassemia Major Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

A toxicity-reduced conditioning regimen with treosulfan, fludarabine, and thiotepa in patients with high-risk β-thalassemia major has significantly improved hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) outcomes. However, complications resulting from regimen-related toxicities (RRTs), mixed chimerism, and graft rejection remain a challenge. We evaluated the dose-exposure-response relationship of treosulfan and its active metabolite S, S-EBDM, in a uniform cohort of patients with β-thalassemia major to identify whether therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and dose adjustment of treosulfan is feasible. Plasma treosulfan/S, S-EBDM levels were measured in 77 patients using a validated liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry method, and the pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using nlmixr2. The influence of treosulfan and S, S-EBDM exposure, and GSTA1/NQO1 polymorphisms on graft rejection, RRTs, chimerism status, and 1-year overall survival (OS), and thalassemia-free survival (TFS) were assessed. We observed that treosulfan exposure was lower in patients with graft rejection than those without (1,655 vs. 2,037 mg•h/L, P = 0.07). Pharmacodynamic modeling analysis to identify therapeutic cutoff revealed that treosulfan exposure ≥1,660 mg•hour/L was significantly associated with better 1-year TFS (97% vs. 81%, P = 0.02) and a trend to better 1-year OS (90% vs. 69%, P = 0.07). Further, multivariate analysis adjusting for known pre-HCT risk factors also revealed treosulfan exposure <1,660 mg•h/L (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.23; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.12-9.34; P = 0.03) and GSTA1*B variant genotype (HR = 3.75; 95% CI = 1.04-13.47; P = 0.04) to be independent predictors for inferior 1-year TFS. We conclude that lower treosulfan exposure increases the risk of graft rejection and early transplant-related mortality affecting TFS. As no RRTs were observed with increasing treosulfan exposure, TDM-based dose adjustment could be feasible and beneficial.

Metformin pretreatment ameliorates busulfan-induced liver endothelial toxicity during haematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The success of Haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is often limited by regimen-related toxicity (RRT) caused by conditioning regimen drugs. Among different conditioning drugs, busulfan (Bu) and treosulfan (Treo), although widely used in HCT, exhibit different toxicity profiles, the mechanism of which is still unclear. Here we investigated the effects of Bu and Treo in endothelial cells. While both Bu and Treo induced DNA damage in endothelial cells, we observed Bu alone to induce oxidative stress and sustained activation of phospho-ERK1/2, leading to apoptosis. However, Treo-treated cells exhibited no oxidative stress/apoptosis of endothelial cells. Screening of pharmacological inhibitors of both ROS and p-ERK revealed that metformin effectively ameliorates Bu-mediated toxicity in endothelial cells. In Balb/c mice, we observed a significant reduction in bone marrow endothelial cells in Bu-treated mice compared to Treo-treated mice. Further, liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSEC) was damaged by Bu, which is implicated in liver vasculature and their functional capacity to uptake FITC-albumin. However, Treo-treated mice liver vasculature was morphologically and functionally normal. When mice were pretreated with metformin followed by Bu, LSECs damage was ameliorated morphologically and functionally. Bone marrow transplants done on these mice did not affect the engraftment of donor cells.

Population pharmacokinetic modeling of treosulfan and rationale for dose recommendation in children treated for conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Intravenously infused treosulfan was evaluated in adult and pediatric patients for conditioning regimen prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was initially developed on 116 adult and pediatric PK profiles from historical trials, to support treosulfan dose recommendations for children in 2 prospective trials. The aim was to assess and update the initial population PK model by inclusion of additional 83 pediatric PK profiles from these 2 trials. The final population PK model was 2-compartmental with dosing in the central compartment, linear elimination, and inter-compartmental clearance. Inter-individual variability was included on clearance (CL), central volume (V1), peripheral volume (V2), and inter-compartmental clearance (Q). The final model described an effect of the body surface area (BSA) on CL, V1, V2, and Q. The final model resulted in a modified dose recommendation for children and advises treosulfan doses of 10 g/m2, 12 g/m2, and 14 g/m2 for BSAs of <0.4 m2, ≥0.4 to <0.9 m2, and ≥0.9 m2, respectively. This simplified BSA-dependent dose recommendation was developed for children, ensuring a well comparable treosulfan exposure as a dose of 14 g/m2 in adults - irrespective of their age and without applying individual therapeutic drug monitoring.

The impact of Treosulfan-based conditioning for inborn errors of immunity: Is dose monitoring crucial?

INTRODUCTION

In children with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) who will receive a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) treosulfan-based conditioning is currently preferred. The aim of this study was to investigate early and late outcomes in pediatric IEI patients receiving pre-HSCT treosulfan and to examine the effect of treosulfan dose monitoring on outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-three pediatric patients receiving this management between 2015 and 2022 were included.

RESULTS

Overall survival rate was 80%, and event-free survival was 67.8%. A larger treosulfan dose AUC after first application increased the rate of early toxicity (p = .034) and slowed lymphocyte engraftment (r = .290; p = .030). Underlying disease, treosulfan AUC, donor type, stem cell type, number of immunosuppressive agents, the dose of anti-thymocyte globulin, and post-transplantation cyclophosphamide did not to increase risk of acute graft-versus-host disease. The risk of mixed chimerism (MC) in patients with autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome and leukocyte adhesion deficiency were higher than those with severe combined immunodeficiency (p = .021 and p = .014, respectively). The risk of MC was lower in those receiving peripheral blood stem cells (SC) compared with bone marrow derived SC (OR = .204, p = .022).

CONCLUSION

The AUC of the treosulfan dose was not associated with poorer late outcomes. Treosulfan is an agent that can be used safely in the IEI patient group,  level measurement appears essential to identify early toxicities. Prospective studies with more extended follow-up periods are needed.

Personalized hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for inborn errors of immunity

Patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) have been transplanted for more than 50 years. Many long-term survivors have ongoing medical issues showing the need for further improvements in how hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is performed if patients in the future are to have a normal quality of life. Precise genetic diagnosis enables early treatment before recurrent infection, autoimmunity and organ impairment occur. Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is established in many countries. For newly described disorders the decision to transplant is not straight-forward. Specific biologic therapies are effective for some diseases and can be used as a bridge to HSCT to improve outcome. Developments in reduced toxicity conditioning and methods of T-cell depletion for mismatched donors have made transplant an option for all eligible patients. Further refinements in conditioning plus precise graft composition and additional cellular therapy are emerging as techniques to personalize the approach to HSCT for each patient.

Evaluation of treosulfan cumulative exposure in paediatric patients through population pharmacokinetics and dosing simulations

AIM

To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of intravenous treosulfan in paediatric patients undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for a broad range of diseases and to explore the impact of different dosing regimens on treosulfan exposure (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC_0→∞ ) through dosing simulations.

METHODS

A prospective multicentre PK study was conducted using treosulfan concentration data (n = 423) collected from 53 children (median age 3.5, range 0.2-17.0 years) receiving three daily age-guided doses (10-14 g/m² ). Population PK modelling was performed using NONMEM software, utilising a stepwise forward selection backward elimination method and likelihood-ratio test for screening covariates to describe PK variability. Monte Carlo simulation was used to generate patient PK data for 10 000 virtual paediatric patients and cumulative AUC_0→∞ values were evaluated using age, body surface area (BSA) and model-based dosing regimens, targeting 4800 mg*h/L.

RESULTS

Treosulfan concentration data were described using a one-compartment PK model with first-order elimination. Population mean (95% CI) estimates for clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V) were 16.3 (14.9-18.1) L/h and 41.9 (38.8-45.1) L, respectively. Allometrically scaled body weight was the best covariate descriptor for CL and V, and maturational age further explained variability in CL. Dosing simulations indicated that in young patient groups (<2 years), a model-based dosing regimen more accurately achieved the target AUC_0→∞ (58.3%) over the age (42.6%) and BSA-based (51.3%) regimens.

CONCLUSION

Treosulfan disposition was described through allometric body weight and maturational age descriptors. Model-informed dosing is recommended for patients under 2 years. Treosulfan PK parameters and AUC_0→∞ were not influenced by patient disease.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Conditioning Agents in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation; Where do We Stand?

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is an established curative treatment that has significantly improved clinical outcome of pediatric patients with malignant and non-malignant disorders. This is partly because of the use of safer and more effective combinations of chemo- and serotherapy prior to HSCT. Still, complications due to the toxicity of these conditioning regimens remains a major cause of transplant-related mortality (TRM). One of the most difficult challenges to further improve HSCT outcome is reducing toxicity while maintaining efficacy. The use of personalized dosing of the various components of the conditioning regimen by means of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been the topic of interest in the last decade. TDM could play an important role, especially in children who tend to show greater pharmacokinetic variability. However, TDM should only be performed when it has clear added value to improve clinical outcome or reduce toxicity. In this review, we provide an overview of the available evidence for the relationship between pharmacokinetic parameters and clinical outcome or toxicities of the most commonly used conditioning agents in pediatric HSCT.

Comparison of Melphalan Combined with Treosulfan or Busulfan as High-Dose Chemotherapy before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in AML

Simple Summary

Different consolidation strategies are available for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients fit for intensive treatment. For favorable- or intermediate-risk AML, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is one of these options. Busulfan plus melphalan is a frequently used and efficient HDCT regimen, but it bears neurotoxic potential and may cause irreversible alopecia, amongst other toxicities. Thus, improving HDCT regimens with lesser toxicity, albeit at comparable anti-leukemic efficacy, is wishful. We combined treosulfan with its more favorable toxicity profile with melphalan for HDCT and compared these patients with a group receiving busulfan/treosulfan. Whereas disease-free and overall survival did not differ significantly, the treosulfan regimen compared favorably, with the absence of neurotoxicity and irreversibly alopecia. Treosulfan serum levels by mass cytometry demonstrated considerable interindividual biovariability. Further studies should explore treosulfan/melphalan for HDCT/ASCT in AML, aiming to improve the quality of life of AML survivors and offer safer consolidation strategies.

Abstract

(1) Background: High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) before autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients predominantly combines busulfan with cyclophosphamide or melphalan. Treosulfan compares favorably regarding lower inter-individual bioavailability and neurotoxicity, but so far, had not been studied before ASCT in AML. (2) Methods: This single-center study investigated AML patients undergoing ASCT in CR1 between November 2017 and September 2020. The first 16 patients received busulfan 16 mg/kg b.w. (days −5 to −2) and melphalan 140 mg/m² (day −1) (BuMel). In a subsequent (TreoMel) cohort, 20 patients received treosulfan 14 g/m² (days −4 to −2) and melphalan. Plasma concentrations of busulfan and treosulfan were determined by mass spectrometry. (3) Results: Neutrophil engraftment and platelet recovery were similar, and PFS and OS were comparable. In only the BuMel cohort, patients reported central nervous toxicities, including seizures (6%) and encephalopathy (12%). The mean AUC for busulfan was 1471.32 μM*min, and for treosulfan it was 836.79 mg/L*h, with ranges of 804.1–2082 μM*min and 454.2–1402 mg/L*h. The peak values for busulfan ranged between 880.19–1734 μg/L and for treosulfan between 194.3–489.25 mg/L. (4) Conclusions: TreoMel appears to be safe and effective for pre-ASCT treatment in AML patients. Due to considerable interindividual biovariability, pharmacologic monitoring may also be warranted for the use of treosulfan.

Impact of Treosulfan Exposure on Early and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Recipients: A Prospective Multicenter Study

Treosulfan-based conditioning has gained popularity in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) because of its presumed favorable efficacy and toxicity profile. Treosulfan is used in standardized dosing regimens based on body surface area. The relationships between systemic treosulfan exposure and early and long-term clinical outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT for nonmalignant diseases remain unclear. In this a multicenter, prospective observational study, we assessed the association between treosulfan exposure and early and, in particular, long-term clinical outcomes. Our study cohort comprised 110 pediatric patients with nonmalignant diseases who underwent HSCT between 2011 and 2019 in Leiden, The Netherlands and Rome, Italy. Blood samples were collected, and treosulfan area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC_0-∞) was estimated as a measure of exposure. Cox proportional hazard survival analyses were performed to assess the relationships between treosulfan exposure and overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS). The predictive value of systemic treosulfan exposure for the occurrence of toxicity within 28 days was evaluated using a multivariable logistic regression analysis. In the overall cohort, OS and EFS at 2 years were 89.0% and 75.3%, respectively, with an excellent OS of 97% in children age <2 years. The occurrence of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease, the level of 1-year whole blood chimerism, and 2-year OS and EFS were not correlated with treosulfan exposure. The occurrence of skin toxicity (odds ratio [OR], 3.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-13.68; P = .02) and all-grade mucositis (OR, 4.43; 95% CI, 1.43-15.50; P = .02), but not grade ≥2 mucositis (OR, 1.51; 95% CI, 0.52 to 4.58; P = .46) was related to high treosulfan exposure (>1750 mg*h/L). Our study demonstrates that standardized treosulfan-based conditioning results in a favorable OS and EFS in infants and children with nonmalignant diseases, independent of interindividual variation in treosulfan exposure. These outcomes can be achieved without the need for therapeutic drug monitoring, thereby emphasizing the advantage of treosulfan use in this category of patients. Although higher treosulfan exposure increases the risk of skin toxicity, there is no absolute necessity for therapeutic drug monitoring if proper preventive skin measures are taken. More research is needed to assess whether deescalation of treosulfan doses is possible to minimize early and long-term toxicity without compromising efficacy.

Treosulfan-based conditioning for inborn errors of immunity

Inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are inherited disorders that lead to defects in the development and/or function of the immune system. The number of disorders that can be treated by haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) has increased rapidly with the advent of next-generation sequencing. The methods used to transplant children with IEI have improved dramatically over the last 20 years. The introduction of reduced-toxicity conditioning is an important factor in the improved outcome of HSCT. Treosulfan has myeloablative and immunosuppressive properties, enabling engraftment with less toxicity than traditionally used doses of busulfan. It is firmly incorporated into the conditioning guidelines of the Inborn Errors Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Unlike busulfan, pharmacokinetically guided dosing of treosulfan is not part of routine practice, but data are emerging which indicate that further improvements in outcome may be possible, particularly in infants who have a decreased clearance of treosulfan. It is likely that individualized dosing, not just of treosulfan, but of all agents used in conditioning regimens, will be developed and implemented in the future. This will lead to a reduction in unwanted variability in drug exposure, leading to more predictable and adjustable exposure, and improved outcome of HSCT, with fewer late adverse effects and improved quality of life. Such conditioning regimens can be used as the basis to study the need for additional agents in certain disorders which are difficult to engraft or require high levels of donor chimerism, the dosing of individual cellular components within grafts, and effects of adjuvant cellular or immunotherapy post-transplant. This review documents the establishment of treosulfan worldwide, as a safe and effective agent for conditioning children with IEI prior to HSCT.

Total Body Irradiation Forever? Optimising Chemotherapeutic Options for Irradiation-Free Conditioning for Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

Total-body irradiation (TBI) based conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is generally regarded as the gold-standard for children >4 years of age with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Retrospective studies in the 1990's suggested better survival with irradiation, confirmed in a small randomised, prospective study in the early 2000's. Most recently, this was reconfirmed by the early results of the large, randomised, international, phase III FORUM study published in 2020. But we know survivors will suffer a multitude of long-term sequelae after TBI, including second malignancies, neurocognitive, endocrine and cardiometabolic effects. The drive to avoid TBI directs us to continue optimising irradiation-free, myeloablative conditioning. In chemotherapy-based conditioning, the dominant myeloablative effect is provided by the alkylating agents, most commonly busulfan or treosulfan. Busulfan with cyclophosphamide is a long-established alternative to TBI-based conditioning in ALL patients. Substituting fludarabine for cyclophosphamide reduces toxicity, but may not be as effective, prompting the addition of a third agent, such as thiotepa, melphalan, and now clofarabine. For busulfan, it's wide pharmacokinetic (PK) variability and narrow therapeutic window is well-known, with widespread use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualise dosing and control the cumulative busulfan exposure. The development of first-dose selection algorithms has helped achieve early, accurate busulfan levels within the targeted therapeutic window. In the future, predictive genetic variants, associated with differing busulfan exposures and toxicities, could be employed to further tailor individualised busulfan-based conditioning for ALL patients. Treosulfan-based conditioning leads to comparable outcomes to busulfan-based conditioning in paediatric ALL, without the need for TDM to date. Future PK evaluation and modelling may optimise therapy and improve outcome. More recently, the addition of clofarabine to busulfan/fludarabine has shown encouraging results when compared to TBI-based regimens. The combination shows activity in ALL as well as AML and deserves further evaluation. Like busulfan, optimization of chemotherapy conditioning may be enhanced by understanding not just the PK of clofarabine, fludarabine, treosulfan and other agents, but also the pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics, ideally in the context of a single disease such as ALL.

Population pharmacokinetic approach for evaluation of treosulfan and its active monoepoxide disposition in plasma and brain on the basis of a rat model

PURPOSE

Efficacy of treosulfan, used in the treatment of marrow disorders, depends on the activity of its monoepoxy-(EBDM) and diepoxy compounds. The study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics of treosulfan and EBDM in the rat plasma and brain by means of mixed-effects modelling.

METHODS

The study had a one-animal-per-sample design and included ninty-six 10-week-old Wistar rats of both sexes. Treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in the brain and plasma were measured by an HPLC-MS/MS method. The population pharmacokinetic model was established in NONMEM software with a first-order estimation method with interaction.

RESULTS

One-compartment pharmacokinetic model best described changes in the concentrations of treosulfan in plasma, and EBDM concentrations in plasma and in the brain. Treosulfan concentrations in the brain followed a two-compartment model. Both treosulfan and EBDM poorly penetrated the blood-brain barrier (ratio of influx and efflux clearances through the blood-brain barrier was 0.120 and 0.317 for treosulfan and EBDM, respectively). Treosulfan plasma clearance was significantly lower in male rats than in females (0.273 L/h/kg vs 0.419 L/h/kg).

CONCLUSIONS

The developed population pharmacokinetic model is the first that allows the prediction of treosulfan and EBDM concentrations in rat plasma and brain. These results provide directions for future studies on treosulfan regarding the contribution of transport proteins or the development of a physiological-based model.

Modelling of neutrophil dynamics in children receiving busulfan or treosulfan for haematopoietic stem cell transplant conditioning

AIMS

Busulfan and treosulfan are cytotoxic agents used in the conditioning regime prior to paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). These agents cause suppression of myeloid cells leaving patients severely immunocompromised in the early post-HSCT period. The main objectives were: (i) to establish a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model for the treatment and engraftment effects on neutrophil counts comparing busulfan and treosulfan-based conditioning, and (ii) to explore current dosing schedules with respect to time to HSCT.

METHODS

Data on 126 patients, 72 receiving busulfan (7 months-18 years, 5.1-47.0 kg) and 54 treosulfan (4 months-17 years, 3.8-35.8 kg), were collected. In total, 8935 neutrophil count observations were recorded during the study period in addition to drug concentrations to develop a mechanistic PKPD model. Absolute neutrophil count profiles were modelled semimechanistically, accounting for transplant effects and differing set points pre- and post-transplant.

RESULTS

PK were best described by 2-compartment models for both drugs. The Friberg semimechanistic neutropenia model was applied with a linear model for busulfan and a maximum efficacy model for treosulfan describing drug effects at various stages of neutrophil maturation. System parameters were consistent across both drugs. The HSCT was represented by an amount of progenitor cells enhancing the neutrophils' proliferation and maturation compartments. Alemtuzumab was found to enhance the proliferative rate under which the absolute neutrophil count begin to grow after HSCT.

CONCLUSION

A semimechanistic PKPD model linking exposure to either busulfan or treosulfan to the neutrophil reconstitution dynamics was successfully built. Alemtuzumab coadministration enhanced the neutrophil proliferative rate after HSCT. Treosulfan administration was suggested to be delayed with respect to time to HSCT, leaving less time between the end of the administration and stem cell infusion.

[Research advances in transplantation for thalassemia major]

Thalassemia is an inherited blood disorder caused by disordered globin chain synthesis due to mutations in the regulatory genes for hemoglobin. At present, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is recognized as the only curative method for treatment. Through the revolution of pretransplantation regimens and selection of donor and source of stem cells, patients' survival has been greatly improved. This article reviews the development of transplantation for thalassemia and related research advances, in order to provide suitable treatment options for clinical application.

Proposed Therapeutic Range of Treosulfan in Reduced Toxicity Pediatric Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Conditioning: Results From a Prospective Trial

Treosulfan is given off‐label in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This study investigated treosulfan's pharmacokinetics (PKs), efficacy, and safety in a prospective trial. Pediatric patients (n = 87) receiving treosulfan‐fludarabine conditioning were followed for at least 1 year posttransplant. PKs were described with a two‐compartment model. During follow‐up, 11 of 87 patients died and 12 of 87 patients had low engraftment (≤ 20% myeloid chimerism). For each increase in treosulfan area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC_(0‐∞)) of 1,000 mg hour/L the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for mortality increase was 1.46 (1.23–1.74), and the hazard ratio for low engraftment was 0.61 (0.36–1.04). A cumulative AUC_(0‐∞) of 4,800 mg hour/L maximized the probability of success (> 20% engraftment and no mortality) at 82%. Probability of success with AUC_(0‐∞) between 80% and 125% of this target were 78% and 79%. Measuring PK at the first dose and individualizing the third dose may be required in nonmalignant disease.

Treosulfan Pharmacokinetics and its Variability in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Conditioning Prior to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Current State of the Art, In-Depth Analysis, and Perspectives

Treosulfan is a prodrug that undergoes a highly pH- and temperature-dependent nonenzymatic conversion to the monoepoxide {(2S,3S)-1,2-epoxy-3,4-butanediol 4-methanesulfonate [S,S-EBDM]} and diepoxide {(2S,3S)-1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane [S,S-DEB]}. Currently, treosulfan is tested in clinical trials as an alternative to busulfan in conditioning prior to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Of note, the optimal dosing of the prodrug is still unresolved, especially in infants. In this paper, the pharmacokinetics of treosulfan, together with its biologically active epoxides, is comprehensively reviewed for the first time, with the focus on conditioning prior to HSCT. Most of the insightful data presented in this review comes from studies that have been conducted in the last 3 years. The article widely discusses the volume of distribution and total clearance of treosulfan. In particular, the interindividual variability of these key parameters in infants, children above 1 year of age, and adults is analyzed, including possible covariates. A clinically important aspect of the formation rate-limited elimination of S,S-EBDM and S,S-DEB is described, including the correlation between the exposure of the prodrug and S,S-EBDM in children. The significance of the elimination half-life of treosulfan and its epoxides for successful conditioning prior to HSCT is also raised. Furthermore, the organ disposition of treosulfan and S,S-EBDM in rats is discussed in the context of the clinical toxicity and myeloablative activity of treosulfan versus busulfan. Moreover, perspectives for future therapeutic drug monitoring of treosulfan are presented. The review is intended to be helpful to pharmacists and doctors in the comprehension of the clinical pharmacokinetics of treosulfan.

Population pharmacokinetics of treosulfan in paediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Aims

Treosulfan is an alkylating agent increasingly used prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. The aim of this study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model of treosulfan in paediatric haematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients and to explore the effect of potential covariates on treosulfan PK. Also, a limited sampling model (LSM) will be developed to accurately predict treosulfan exposure suitable for a therapeutic drug monitoring setting.

Methods

In this multicentre study, 91 patients, receiving a total dose of 30, 36 or 42 g/m² treosulfan, administered over 3 consecutive days, were enrolled. A population PK model was developed and demographic factors, as well as laboratory parameters, were included as potential covariates. In addition, a LSM was developed using data from 28 patients.

Results

A 2‐compartment model with first order elimination best described the data. Bodyweight with allometric scaling and maturation function were identified as significant predictors of treosulfan clearance. Treosulfan clearance reaches 90% of adult values at 4 postnatal years. A model‐based dosing table is presented to target an exposure of 1650 mg*h/L (population median) for different weight and age groups. Samples taken at 1.5, 4 and 7 hours after start of infusion resulted in the best limited sampling strategy.

Conclusions

This study provides a treosulfan population PK model in children and captures the developmental changes in clearance. A 3‐point LSM allows for accurate and precise estimation of treosulfan exposure.

Pre-formulation investigations for establishing a protocol for treosulfan handling and activation

INTRODUCTION

Treosulfan is an alkylating agent that is used for the treatment of ovarian cancer and for conditioning prior to stem cell transplantation. It is a prodrug that is activated non-enzymatically to two active epoxides.

OBJECTIVES

To optimize a protocol for both in vivo samples handling and in vitro drug preparation. Treosulfan stability was tested in biological fluids at different conditions as well as for its cytotoxicity on cell lines.

RESULTS

Plasma samples can be safely frozen for a short period up to 8 h, however; for longer periods, samples should be acidified. Urine samples and cell culture media can be safely frozen regardless their pH. For in vitro investigations, incubation of treosulfan at 37 °C for 24 h activated 100% of the drug. Whole blood acidification should be avoided for the risk of hemolysis. Finally; treosulfan cytotoxicity on HL-60 cells has increased following pre-incubation for 24 h at 37 °C compared to K562 cell line.

CONCLUSION

The stability profiling of treosulfan provided a valuable reference for handling of biological samples for both in vivo and in vitro studies. These results can be utilized for further investigations concerning the drug kinetics and dynamics in addition to the development of new pharmaceutical formulations.