Utilization of direct smears of thyroid fine-needle aspirates for ancillary molecular testing: A comparison of two proprietary testing platforms

Prospective Validation of ThyroSPEC Molecular Testing of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodule Cytology Following Diagnostic Pathway Optimization

Background: Molecular testing for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) is often reported with incomplete data on clinical assessment and ultrasound malignancy risk (USMR) stratification. This study aimed to clinically validate the diagnostic accuracy of a novel molecular test, assess the incremental preoperative malignancy risk of other clinical factors, and measure the impacts of introducing molecular testing at the population level. Methods: Comprehensive clinical data were collected prospectively for the first 615 consecutive patients with ITNs in a centralized health care system following implementation of a reflexive molecular test. Clinical data include patient history, method of nodule discovery, clinical assessment, USMR, cytology, molecular testing, and surgery or follow-up along with surgeon notes on surgical decision-making. Accuracy of molecular testing and the impact of the introduction of molecular testing were calculated. A multivariable regression model was developed to identify which clinical factors have the most diagnostic significance for ITNs. Results: A locally developed, low-cost molecular test achieved a negative predictive value (NPV) of 76-91% [confidence interval, CI 66-95%] and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 46-65% [CI 37-75%] in ITNs using only residual material from standard liquid cytology fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Sensitivity was highest (80%; [CI 63-92%]) in the American Thyroid Association (ATA) intermediate-suspicion ultrasound category, and lowest (46%; [CI 19-75%]) in the ATA high-suspicion ultrasound category. Following implementation of molecular testing, diagnostic yield increased by 14% (p = 0.2442) and repeat FNAs decreased by 24% (p = 0.05). Mutation was the primary reason for surgery in 76% of resected, mutation-positive patients. High-risk mutations were associated with a 58% (p = 0.0001) shorter wait for surgery. Twenty-six percent of patients with a negative molecular test result underwent surgery. Multivariable regression highlighted molecular testing and USMR as significantly associated with malignancy. Conclusions: Molecular testing improves preoperative risk stratification but requires further stratification for intermediate-risk mutations. Incorporation of clinical factors (especially USMR) with molecular testing may increase the sensitivity for detection of malignancy. Introduction of molecular testing offers some clinical benefits even in a low resection rate setting, and directly influences surgical decision-making. This study illustrates the importance of the local diagnostic pathway in ensuring appropriate integrated use of molecular testing for best outcomes.

Molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodules: past, present, and future

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the origin, current progress, and future directions of molecular testing in indeterminate Bethesda III and Bethesda IV thyroid nodules.

RECENT FINDINGS

The diagnostic performance of current genomic tests shows improved benign call rates, specificity and positive-predictive values over prior test versions. The choice of test platform for clinical use should consider test performance, institutional rate of malignancy, nodule cytology and the potential for prognostication to help guide decision-making. Current challenges include test reliability, defining the optimal duration of surveillance, and improving test performance in challenging cytology, such as oncocytic nodules and NIFTP. Opportunities also remain to optimize cost-effectiveness across multiple clinical and practice settings and to refine the use of molecular testing for dynamic risk stratification, such as with BRAF V600E mutation testing.

SUMMARY

Molecular testing of indeterminate thyroid nodules has helped to reduce the burden of diagnostic surgery, associated healthcare costs, and potential complications. Current-generation tests have demonstrated improvement in diagnostic performance, but challenges remain in improving test performance and refining the scope of testing in care. Decision-making for the management of indeterminate thyroid nodules should consider cytology, clinical and sonographic features, patient values and preferences and molecular testing results, whenever available.

Molecular testing of cytology specimens: overview of assay selection with focus on lung, salivary gland, and thyroid testing

Ancillary and molecular testing of cytopathology specimens has emerged as a reliable and useful tool to provide diagnostic information and treatment-related biomarker status for the management of cancer patients. The cytology specimens obtained through minimally invasive means have proven suitable testing substrates for a variety of ancillary tests, including immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization, as well as polymerase chain reaction and next generation sequencing molecular techniques. By focusing specifically on the cytology specimen, this review provides an overview of basic testing considerations and assay selection in addition to updates on the ancillary testing of cytologic tumor specimens from the lung, salivary gland, and thyroid.

Thyroseq v3, Afirma GSC, and microRNA Panels Versus Previous Molecular Tests in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Molecular tests are being used increasingly as an auxiliary diagnostic tool so as to avoid a diagnostic surgery approach for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs). Previous test versions, Thyroseq v2 and Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), have proven shortcomings in malignancy detection performance.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the established Thyroseq v3, Afirma Gene Sequencing Classifier (GSC), and microRNA-based assays versus prior iterations in ITNs, in light of "rule-in" and "rule-out" concepts. It further analyzed the impact of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP) reclassification and Bethesda cytological subtypes on the performance of molecular tests.

METHODS

Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science were the databases used for the present research, a process that lasted until September 2020. A random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate the summary sensitivity, specificity, positive (PLR) and negative likelihood ratios (NLR), and area under the curve (AUC) for each panel. The conducted sensitivity analyses addressed different Bethesda categories and NIFTP thresholds.

RESULTS

A total of 40 eligible studies were included with 7,831 ITNs from 7,565 patients. Thyroseq v3 showed the best overall performance (AUC 0.95; 95% confidence interval: 0.93-0.97), followed by Afirma GSC (AUC 0.90; 0.87-0.92) and Thyroseq v2 (AUC 0.88; 0.85-0.90). In terms of "rule-out" abilities Thyroseq v3 (NLR 0.02; 95%CI: 0.0-2.69) surpassed Afirma GEC (NLR 0.18; 95%CI: 0.10-0.33). Thyroseq v2 (PLR 3.5; 95%CI: 2.2-5.5) and Thyroseq v3 (PLR 2.8; 95%CI: 1.2-6.3) achieved superior "rule-in" properties compared to Afirma GSC (PLR 1.9; 95%CI: 1.3-2.8). Evidence for Thyroseq v3 seems to have higher quality, notwithstanding the paucity of studies. Both Afirma GEC and Thyroseq v2 performance have been affected by NIFTP reclassification. ThyGenNEXT/ThyraMIR and RosettaGX show prominent preliminary results.

CONCLUSION

The newly emerged tests, Thyroseq v3 and Afirma GSC, designed for a "rule-in" purpose, have been proved to outperform in abilities to rule out malignancy, thus surpassing previous tests no longer available, Thyroseq 2 and Afirma GEC. However, Thyroseq v2 still ranks as the best rule-in molecular test.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42020212531.

The role of molecular genetics in the presurgical management of thyroid nodules

INTRODUCTION

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is an important diagnostic tool for the evaluation of thyroid nodules. However, in almost ¼ of all nodules submitted to FNA cytology is indeterminate. Since the majority of genetic alterations in thyroid cancer have been identified, the use of molecular testing platforms has been endorsed by American Thyroid Association for management of indeterminate nodules.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Several commercial tests were based on mRNA expression of FNA samples (Afirma®, Veracyte, South San Francisco, CA, USA) while others detect DNA alterations (ThyroSeq, UPMC, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). Noncommercial tests detect limited number of point mutations or re-arrangements (gene panels). Literature study included a Pubmed research for adult original studies from 2003 to 2020, focusing on terms such as "molecular tests," "nodules with indeterminate AUS/FLUS and FN/SFN cytology."

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Gene expression profile tests serve as "rule out" tests due to their high negative predictive value and perform better in a setting of low cancer pretest probability. Genetic alteration platforms display high positive predictive value and serve as rather "rule in" tests but their diagnostic accuracy is hampered either because a small proportion of nodules does not harbor any of these alterations targeted (gene panels) or because commonly identified RAS mutations can also be found in benign nodules.

CONCLUSIONS

Next generation sequencing development and incorporation of other genetic markers such as miRNA can improve diagnostic accuracy of molecular tests.

Molecular markers for the classification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of indeterminate lesions of the thyroid is a challenge in cytopathology practice. Indeed, up to 30% of cases lack the morphological features needed to provide definitive classification. Molecular tests have been developed to assist in the diagnosis of these indeterminate cases. The first studies dealing with the preoperative molecular evaluation of FNA samples focused on the analysis of BRAF^V600E or on the combined evaluation of two or three genetic alterations. The sensitivity of molecular testing was then improved through the introduction of gene panels, which became available for clinical use in the late 2000s. Two different categories of molecular tests have been developed, the 'rule-out' methods, which aim to reduce the avoidable treatment of benign nodules, and the 'rule-in' tests that have the purpose to optimize surgical management. The genetic evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules is predicted to improve patient care, particularly if molecular tests are used appropriately and with the awareness of their advantages and weaknesses. The main disadvantage of these tests is the cost, which makes them rarely used in Europe. To overcome this limitation, customized panels have been set up, which are able to detect the most frequent genetic alterations of thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present review, the most recent available versions of commercial molecular tests and of custom, non-commercial panels are described. Their characteristics and accuracy in the differential diagnosis of indeterminate nodules, namely Bethesda classes III (Atypical follicular lesion of undetermined significance, AUS/FLUS) and IV (Suspicious for follicular neoplasm, FN/SFN) are fully analyzed and discussed.

The American Association of Endocrine Surgeons Guidelines for the Definitive Surgical Management of Thyroid Disease in Adults

OBJECTIVE

To develop evidence-based recommendations for safe, effective, and appropriate thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND

Surgical management of thyroid disease has evolved considerably over several decades leading to variability in rendered care. Over 100,000 thyroid operations are performed annually in the US.

METHODS

The medical literature from 1/1/1985 to 11/9/2018 was reviewed by a panel of 19 experts in thyroid disorders representing multiple disciplines. The authors used the best available evidence to construct surgical management recommendations. Levels of evidence were determined using the American College of Physicians grading system, and management recommendations were discussed to consensus. Members of the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons reviewed and commented on preliminary drafts of the content.

RESULTS

These clinical guidelines analyze the indications for thyroidectomy as well as its definitions, technique, morbidity, and outcomes. Specific topics include Pathogenesis and Epidemiology, Initial Evaluation, Imaging, Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Diagnosis, Molecular Testing, Indications, Extent and Outcomes of Surgery, Preoperative Care, Initial Thyroidectomy, Perioperative Tissue Diagnosis, Nodal Dissection, Concurrent Parathyroidectomy, Hyperthyroid Conditions, Goiter, Adjuncts and Approaches to Thyroidectomy, Laryngology, Familial Thyroid Cancer, Postoperative Care and Complications, Cancer Management, and Reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based guidelines were created to assist clinicians in the optimal surgical management of thyroid disease.

Testing for Afirma in Thyroid Nodules with High-Risk Indeterminate Cytology (TIR3B): First Italian Experience

A percentage of 15 to 30% of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is indeterminate, i.e., TIR3A and TIR3B according to the Italian consensus for thyroid cytology. Afirma, a molecular analysis of thyroid FNA specimens, has recently gained popularity as an adjunct to microscopic cytological evaluation, in order to avoid diagnostic surgery in patients with indeterminate thyroid cytology. We described the first Italian experience with Afirma tests in a single Italian institution and assessed the performance of the Afirma test in TIR3B. Moreover, this is a preliminary study to assess the patient response to the offer of Afirma testing. The Afirma test was proposed to 67 patients with thyroid nodules that had yielded TIR3B cytology. Fifty-one patients (76.1%) chose the Afirma test, 25/51 underwent the test but the remaining 26 did not because of cost. A total of 41/67 (61.2%) patients underwent surgery, and 22/41 (53.7%) nodules were carcinomas. Of the 25 tested by Afirma, 9 (36%) were classified as Afirma-suspicious (Afirma-S); seven of them underwent surgery, and in 6/7 (85.7%), a cancer was proven at histology. Afirma is the procedure that many Italian patients with TIR3B lesions would choose. However, its routine clinical application in Italy is currently limited by high costs for the patient. When Afirma is performed in this setting of patients, the cancer risk of suspicious result is higher than that expected in all the series of TIR3B. Therefore, testing for Afirma in these nodules may be useful for managing patients and tailoring their surgical approach.

Molecular Variants and Their Risks for Malignancy in Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Background: Gene panels are routinely used to assess predisposition to hereditary cancers by simultaneously testing multiple susceptibility genes and/or variants. More recently, genetic panels have been implemented as part of solid tumor malignancy testing assessing somatic alterations. One example is targeted variant panels for thyroid nodules that are not conclusively malignant or benign upon fine-needle aspiration (FNA). We systematically reviewed published studies from 2009 to 2018 that contained genetic data from preoperative FNA specimens on cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules (ITNs) that subsequently underwent surgical resection. Pooled prevalence estimates per gene and variant, along with their respective positive predictive values (PPVs) for malignancy, were calculated. Summary: Our systematic search identified 540 studies that were supplemented by 18 studies from bibliographies or personal files. Sixty-one studies met all inclusion criteria and included >4600 ITNs. Overall, 26% of nodules contained at least 1 variant or fusion. However, half of them did not include details on the specific gene, variant, and/or complete fusion pair reported for inclusion toward PPV calculations. The PPVs of genomic alterations reported at least 10 times were limited to BRAF^V600E (98%, 95% confidence interval [CI 96-99%]), PAX8/PPARG (55% [CI 34-78%]), HRAS^Q61R (45% [CI 22-72%]), BRAF^K601E (42% [CI 19-68%]), and NRAS^Q61R (38% [CI 23-55%]). Excluding BRAF^V600E, the pooled PPV for all other specified variants and fusions was 47%. Multiple variants within the same nodule were identified in ∼1% of ITN and carried a cumulative PPV of 77%. Conclusions: The chance that a genomic alteration predicts malignancy depends on the individual variant or fusion detected. Only five alterations were reported at least 10 times; BRAF^V600E had a PPV of 98%, while the remaining four had individual PPVs ranging from 38% to 55%. The small sample size of most variants and fusion pairs found among ITNs, however, limits confidence in their individual PPV point estimates. Better specific reporting of genomic alterations with cytological category, histological subtype, and cancer staging would facilitate better understanding of cancer prediction, and the independent contribution of the genomic profile to prognosis.

Overview of Molecular Testing of Cytology Specimens

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing cytology specimens for molecular testing has attracted increasing attention in the era of personalized medicine. Cytology specimens are clinically easier to access. The samples can be quickly and completely fixed in a very short time of fixation before tissue degradation occurs, compared to hours or days of fixation in surgical pathology specimens. In addition, cytology specimens can be fixed without formalin, which can significantly damage DNA and RNA. All these factors contribute to the superb quality of DNA and RNA in cytology specimens for molecular tests.

STUDY DESIGN

We summarize the most pertinent information in the literature regarding molecular testing in the field of cytopathology.

RESULTS

The first part focuses on the types of cytological specimens that can be used for molecular testing, including the advantages and limitations. The second section describes the common molecular tests and their clinical application.

CONCLUSION

Various types of cytology specimens are suitable for many molecular tests, which may require additional clinical laboratory validation.

Update on Molecular Testing for Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules

Fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and ultrasonography are the most common modalities for the diagnosis and follow up of thyroid nodules. FNAB is able to distinguish benign from malignant nodules with high sensitivity and specificity; however, 20% to 30% of nodules are diagnosed as indeterminate with a risk of malignancy varying from 10% to 75% based on the 2017 revision of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Molecular tests are being increasingly used to triage this group of nodules. Several molecular tests are commercially available and newer upgrades are being developed to either "rule in" or "rule out" malignancy with greater accuracy. The Afirma gene expression classifier and its recent upgrade (the Afirma gene sequencing classifier), Thryoseq v2, a next generation sequencing test and its recent upgrade (the v3), RosettaGX Reveal based on microRNA alterations, and ThyGenX/ThyraMIR, a combination test, are currently on the market. Familiarity with these tests, their performance, and postvalidation publications will enable appropriate test selection and improve triage of patients for appropriate therapy. The underlying rate of malignancy at different institutions and the interobserver variability in cytologic and histologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions are important factors that impact the performance of the various molecular tests.

Determining the molecular test for indeterminate thyroid nodules best suited for our practice: A quality assurance study

INTRODUCTION

Currently, molecular studies are widely used as a guiding tool in further management of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. At our institution, clinicians have recently expressed concern over receiving "less positive molecular results" upon switching from an extended 14 gene mutation panel (EGMP) to a 7 gene mutation panel (GMP). Our goal is to compare outcomes of these two tests in regards to the performance characteristics and clinical impact.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy specimens sent for molecular studies from 2016 to 2017 were retrospectively studied. Cytopathology diagnosis, pertinent clinical findings, molecular results, and follow-up (F/U) surgical and cytology diagnoses were recorded.

RESULTS

Of the total 165 cases sent for molecular tests 86 (52%) were GMP and 79 (47%) EGMP. There were 21 (24%) and 40 (50%) cases with positive GMP and EGMP results, respectively. Within these positive cases (n = 61), there were a total of 33 (54%) patients who underwent surgical resection and 28 (45%) patients had no follow-up. The molecular findings and surgical pathologic diagnoses obtained are illustrated in Figures 1 through 4 for GMP and EGMP, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The selection of molecular testing should be directed toward optimizing patient care and facilitate clinical management. This quality assurance study helped in understanding the complexities associated with test selection best suited for our institution and in educating clinicians.