1
|
Higham TE, Ferry LA, Schmitz L, Irschick DJ, Starko S, Anderson PSL, Bergmann PJ, Jamniczky HA, Monteiro LR, Navon D, Messier J, Carrington E, Farina SC, Feilich KL, Hernandez LP, Johnson MA, Kawano SM, Law CJ, Longo SJ, Martin CH, Martone PT, Rico-Guevara A, Santana SE, Niklas KJ. Linking ecomechanical models and functional traits to understand phenotypic diversity. Trends Ecol Evol 2021; 36:860-873. [PMID: 34218955 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2021.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Physical principles and laws determine the set of possible organismal phenotypes. Constraints arising from development, the environment, and evolutionary history then yield workable, integrated phenotypes. We propose a theoretical and practical framework that considers the role of changing environments. This 'ecomechanical approach' integrates functional organismal traits with the ecological variables. This approach informs our ability to predict species shifts in survival and distribution and provides critical insights into phenotypic diversity. We outline how to use the ecomechanical paradigm using drag-induced bending in trees as an example. Our approach can be incorporated into existing research and help build interdisciplinary bridges. Finally, we identify key factors needed for mass data collection, analysis, and the dissemination of models relevant to this framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy E Higham
- Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
| | - Lara A Ferry
- School of Mathematical and Natural Sciences, Arizona State University, Glendale, AZ 85306, USA
| | - Lars Schmitz
- W.M. Keck Science Department, 925 N. Mills Avenue, Claremont McKenna, Pitzer, and Scripps Colleges, Claremont, CA, 91711, USA
| | - Duncan J Irschick
- Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, USA
| | - Samuel Starko
- Botany Department and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Department of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Philip S L Anderson
- Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Behavior, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
| | - Philip J Bergmann
- Biology Department, Clark University, 950 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01610, USA
| | - Heather A Jamniczky
- Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, T2N 1N4, Canada
| | - Leandro R Monteiro
- Laboratório de Ciências Ambientais, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense. Av. Alberto Lamego 2000, Campos dos Goytacazes, RJ, cep 28013-602, Brazil
| | - Dina Navon
- Human Genetics Institute of NJ, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
| | - Julie Messier
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave. W., Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Emily Carrington
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Stacy C Farina
- Department of Biology, Howard University, 415 College Street NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA
| | - Kara L Feilich
- Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, 1027 E 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - L Patricia Hernandez
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Michele A Johnson
- Department of Biology, Trinity University, San Antonio, TX 78212, USA
| | - Sandy M Kawano
- Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Chris J Law
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Mammalogy and Division of Paleontology, Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, 200 Central Park West, New York, New York 10024, USA
| | - Sarah J Longo
- Department of Biological Sciences, Towson University, Towson, MD 21252, USA
| | - Christopher H Martin
- Integrative Biology and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
| | - Patrick T Martone
- Botany Department and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | | | | | - Karl J Niklas
- School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sargent AJ, Groom DJE, Rico-Guevara A. Locomotion and Energetics of Divergent Foraging Strategies in Hummingbirds: A Review. Integr Comp Biol 2021; 61:736-748. [PMID: 34113992 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Revised: 06/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Hummingbirds have two main foraging strategies: territoriality (defending a patch of flowers) and traplining (foraging over routine circuits of isolated patches). Species are often classified as employing one or the other. Not only have these strategies been inconsistently defined within the behavioral literature, but this simple framework also neglects the substantial evidence for flexible foraging behavior displayed by hummingbirds. Despite these limitations, research on hummingbird foraging has explored the distinct avenues of selection that proponents of either strategy presumably face: trapliners maximizing foraging efficiency, and territorialists favoring speed and maneuverability for resource defense. In earlier studies, these functions were primarily examined through wing disc loading (ratio of body weight to the circular area swept out by the wings, WDL) and predicted hovering costs, with trapliners expected to exhibit lower WDL than territorialists and thus lower hovering costs. While these pioneering models continue to play a role in current research, early studies were constrained by modest technology, and the original expectations regarding WDL have not held up when applied across complex hummingbird assemblages. Current technological advances have allowed for innovative research on the biomechanics/energetics of hummingbird flight, such as allometric scaling relationships (e.g., wing area-flight performance) and the link between high burst lifting performance and territoriality. Providing a predictive framework based on these relationships will allow us to reexamine previous hypotheses, and explore the biomechanical trade-offs to different foraging strategies, which may yield divergent routes of selection for quintessential territoriality and traplining. With a biomechanical and morphofunctional lens, here we examine the locomotor and energetic facets that dictate hummingbird foraging, and provide (a) predictions regarding the behavioral, biomechanical, and morphofunctional associations with territoriality and traplining; and (b) proposed methods of testing them. By pursuing these knowledge gaps, future research could use a variety of traits to help clarify the operational definitions of territoriality and traplining, to better apply them in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Sargent
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 4300 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - D J E Groom
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 4300 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA
| | - A Rico-Guevara
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 4300 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Khelifa R, Mahdjoub H, M’Gonigle LK, Kremen C. Integrating high-speed videos in capture-mark-recapture studies of insects. Ecol Evol 2021; 11:6033-6040. [PMID: 34141200 PMCID: PMC8207387 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Capture-mark-recapture (CMR) studies have been used extensively in ecology and evolution. While it is feasible to apply CMR in some animals, it is considerably more challenging in small fast-moving species such as insects. In these groups, low recapture rates can bias estimates of demographic parameters, thereby handicapping effective analysis and management of wild populations. Here, we use high-speed videos (HSV) to capture two large dragonfly species, Anax junius and Rhionaeschna multicolor, that rarely land and, thus, are particularly challenging for CMR studies. We test whether HSV, compared to conventional "eye" observations, increases the "resighting" rates and, consequently, improves estimates of both survival rates and the effects of demographic covariates on survival. We show that the use of HSV increases the number of resights by 64% in A. junius and 48% in R. multicolor. HSV improved our estimates of resighting and survival probability which were either under- or overestimated with the conventional observations. Including HSV improved credible intervals for resighting rate and survival probability by 190% and 130% in A. junius and R. multicolor, respectively. Hence, it has the potential to open the door to a wide range of research possibilities on species that are traditionally difficult to monitor with distance sampling, including within insects and birds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rassim Khelifa
- Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | - Hayat Mahdjoub
- Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| | | | - Claire Kremen
- Department of Zoology and Biodiversity Research CentreUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
- Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBCCanada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rico-Guevara A, Hurme KJ, Elting R, Russell AL. Bene"fit" Assessment in Pollination Coevolution: Mechanistic Perspectives on Hummingbird Bill-Flower Matching. Integr Comp Biol 2021; 61:681-695. [PMID: 34050734 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icab111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
One of the reasons why flowering plants became the most diverse group of land plants is their association with animals to reproduce. The earliest examples of this mutualism involved insects foraging for food from plants and, in the process, pollinating them. Vertebrates are latecomers to these mutualisms, but birds, in particular, present a wide variety of nectar-feeding clades that have adapted to solve similar challenges. Such challenges include surviving on small caloric rewards widely scattered across the landscape, matching their foraging strategy to nectar replenishment rate, and efficiently collecting this liquid food from well-protected chambers deep inside flowers. One particular set of convergent traits among plants and their bird pollinators has been especially well studied: the match between the shape and size of bird bills and ornithophilous flowers. Focusing on a highly specialized group, hummingbirds, we examine the expected benefits from bill-flower matching, with a strong focus on the benefits to the hummingbird and how to quantify them. Explanations for the coevolution of bill-flower matching include (1) that the evolution of traits by bird-pollinated plants, such as long and thin corollas, prevents less efficient pollinators (e.g., insects) from accessing the nectar and (2) that increased matching, as a result of reciprocal adaptation, benefits both the bird (nectar extraction efficiency) and the plant (pollen transfer). In addition to nectar-feeding, we discuss how interference and exploitative competition also play a significant role in the evolution and maintenance of trait matching. We present hummingbird-plant interactions as a model system to understand how trait matching evolves and how pollinator behavior can modify expectations based solely on morphological matching, and discuss the implications of this behavioral modulation for the maintenance of specialization. While this perspective piece directly concerns hummingbird-plant interactions, the implications are much broader. Functional trait matching is likely common in coevolutionary interactions (e.g., in predator-prey interactions), yet the physical mechanisms underlying trait matching are understudied and rarely quantified. We summarize existing methods and present novel approaches that can be used to quantify key benefits to interacting partners in a variety of ecological systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Rico-Guevara
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Division of Ornithology, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 4300 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Kristiina J Hurme
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Rosalee Elting
- Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.,Division of Ornithology, Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture, 4300 15th Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Avery L Russell
- Department of Biology, Missouri State University, 910 S John Q Hammons Pkwy, Springfield, MO 65897, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kubizňák P, Hochachka WM, Osoba V, Kotek T, Kuchař J, Klapetek V, Hradcová K, Růžička J, Zárybnická M. Designing network‐connected systems for ecological research and education. Ecosphere 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.2761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Petr Kubizňák
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | | | - Vlastimil Osoba
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Tomáš Kotek
- Faculty of Engineering Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Jan Kuchař
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Václav Klapetek
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Kateřina Hradcová
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Jan Růžička
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| | - Markéta Zárybnická
- Faculty of Environmental Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Kamýcká 129 Praha – Suchdol 165 00 Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rico-Guevara A, Rubega MA, Hurme KJ, Dudley R. Shifting Paradigms in the Mechanics of Nectar Extraction and Hummingbird Bill Morphology. Integr Org Biol 2019; 1:oby006. [PMID: 33791513 PMCID: PMC7671138 DOI: 10.1093/iob/oby006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
As functional morphologists, we aim to connect structures, mechanisms, and emergent higher-scale phenomena (e.g., behavior), with the ulterior motive of addressing evolutionary patterns. The fit between flowers and hummingbird bills has long been used as an example of impressive co-evolution, and hence hummingbirds' foraging behavior and ecological associations have been the subject of intense study. To date, models of hummingbird foraging have been based on the almost two-centuries-old assumption that capillary rise loads nectar into hummingbird tongue grooves. Furthermore, the role of the bill in the drinking process has been overlooked, instead considering it as the mere vehicle with which to traverse the corolla and access the nectar chamber. As a scientific community, we have been making incorrect assumptions about the basic aspects of how hummingbirds extract nectar from flowers. In this article, we summarize recent advances on drinking biomechanics, morphological and ecological patterns, and selective forces involved in the shaping of the hummingbird feeding apparatus, and also address its modifications in a previously unexpected context, namely conspecific and heterospecific fighting. We explore questions such as: how do the mechanics of feeding define the limits and adaptive consequences of foraging behaviors? Which are the selective forces that drive bill and tongue shape, and associated sexually dimorphic traits? And finally, what are the proximate and ultimate causes of their foraging strategies, including exploitative and interference competition? Increasing our knowledge of morphology, mechanics, and diversity of hummingbird feeding structures will have implications for understanding the ecology and evolution of these remarkable animals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Rico-Guevara
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3040 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.,Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Código Postal 11001, Bogotá DC, Colombia
| | - M A Rubega
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | - K J Hurme
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3040 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.,Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | - R Dudley
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, 3040 Valley Life Sciences Building, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mickley JG, Moore TE, Schlichting CD, DeRobertis A, Pfisterer EN, Bagchi R. Measuring microenvironments for global change: DIY environmental microcontroller units (EMUs). Methods Ecol Evol 2018. [DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James G. Mickley
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| | - Timothy E. Moore
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| | - Carl D. Schlichting
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| | - Amber DeRobertis
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| | - Emilia N. Pfisterer
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| | - Robert Bagchi
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Buxton RT, Lendrum PE, Crooks KR, Wittemyer G. Pairing camera traps and acoustic recorders to monitor the ecological impact of human disturbance. Glob Ecol Conserv 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
|
9
|
Rico‐Guevara A, Mickley J. Bring your own camera to the trap: An inexpensive, versatile, and portable triggering system tested on wild hummingbirds. Ecol Evol 2017; 7:4592-4598. [PMID: 28690789 PMCID: PMC5496556 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2017] [Revised: 03/28/2017] [Accepted: 03/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
The study of animals in the wild offers opportunities to collect relevant information on their natural behavior and abilities to perform ecologically relevant tasks. However, it also poses challenges such as accounting for observer effects, human sensory limitations, and the time intensiveness of this type of research. To meet these challenges, field biologists have deployed camera traps to remotely record animal behavior in the wild. Despite their ubiquity in research, many commercial camera traps have limitations, and the species and behavior of interest may present unique challenges. For example, no camera traps support high-speed video recording. We present a new and inexpensive camera trap system that increases versatility by separating the camera from the triggering mechanism. Our system design can pair with virtually any camera and allows for independent positioning of a variety of sensors, all while being low-cost, lightweight, weatherproof, and energy efficient. By using our specialized trigger and customized sensor configurations, many limitations of commercial camera traps can be overcome. We use this system to study hummingbird feeding behavior using high-speed video cameras to capture fast movements and multiple sensors placed away from the camera to detect small body sizes. While designed for hummingbirds, our application can be extended to any system where specialized camera or sensor features are required, or commercial camera traps are cost-prohibitive, allowing camera trap use in more research avenues and by more researchers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Rico‐Guevara
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyCAUSA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsCTUSA
| | - James Mickley
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|