1
|
Clairbaux M, Rönkä M, Anker-Nilssen T, Artukhin Y, Danielsen J, Gavrilo M, Gilchrist G, Hansen ES, Hedd A, Kaler R, Kuletz K, Olsen B, Mallory ML, Merkel FR, Strøm H, Fort J, Grémillet D. An ecologically sound and participatory monitoring network for pan-Arctic seabirds. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2024:e14287. [PMID: 38745504 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
In a warming Arctic, circumpolar long-term monitoring programs are key to advancing ecological knowledge and informing environmental policies. Calls for better involvement of Arctic peoples in all stages of the monitoring process are widespread, although such transformation of Arctic science is still in its infancy. Seabirds stand out as ecological sentinels of environmental changes, and priority has been given to implement the Circumpolar Seabird Monitoring Plan (CSMP). We assessed the representativeness of a pan-Arctic seabird monitoring network focused on the black-legged kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla) by comparing the distribution of environmental variables for all known versus monitored colonies. We found that with respect to its spatiotemporal coverage, this monitoring network does not fully embrace current and future environmental gradients. To improve the current scheme, we designed a method to identify colonies whose inclusion in the monitoring network will improve its ecological representativeness, limit logistical constraints, and improve involvement of Arctic peoples. We thereby highlight that inclusion of study sites in the Bering Sea, Siberia, western Russia, northern Norway, and southeastern Greenland could improve the current monitoring network and that their proximity to local populations might allow increased involvement of local communities. Our framework can be applied to improve existing monitoring networks in other ecoregions and sociological contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Clairbaux
- School of Biological, Environmental and Earth Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- MaREI Centre for Energy, Climate and Marine, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
| | - Mia Rönkä
- Biodiversity Unit, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | | | - Yuri Artukhin
- Kamchatka Branch of the Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, Russia
| | | | - Maria Gavrilo
- Association Maritime Heritage, Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
| | - Grant Gilchrist
- National Wildlife Research Centre, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - April Hedd
- Wildlife Research Division, Science & Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Mount Pearl, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | - Robert Kaler
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Kathy Kuletz
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | - Bergur Olsen
- Faroe Marine Research Institute, Tórshavn, Faroe Islands
| | - Mark L Mallory
- Department of Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Flemming Ravn Merkel
- Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
- Greenland Institute of Natural Resources, Nuuk, Greenland
| | | | - Jérôme Fort
- Littoral, Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR7266 CNRS - La Rochelle Université, La Rochelle, France
| | - David Grémillet
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France
- FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Phillips JA, Guilford T, Fayet AL. How do resource distribution and taxonomy affect the use of dual foraging in seabirds? A review. Behav Ecol 2023; 34:769-779. [PMID: 37744167 PMCID: PMC10516677 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arad052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023] Open
Abstract
In many seabird species, parents feeding young switch between short and long foraging excursions in a strategy known as "dual foraging." To investigate whether habitat quality near breeding colonies drives the use of dual foraging, we conducted a review of the seabird literature, compiling the results of 102 studies which identified dual-foraging in 50 species across nine families from all six seabird orders. We estimated the mean distance from the colony of each species' short and long foraging trips and obtained remote-sensed data on chlorophyll-a concentrations within the radius of both short and long trips around each colony. We then assessed, for each seabird family, the relationship between the use of dual foraging strategies and the difference in the quality of foraging locations between short- and long-distance foraging trips. We found that the probability of dual foraging grew with increasing differences in the quality of foraging locations available during short- and long-distance trips. We also found that when controlling for differences in habitat quality, albatrosses and penguins were less likely to use dual foraging than Procellariidae, which in turn were less likely to use dual foraging than Sulids. This study helps clarify how environmental conditions and taxon-specific characteristics influence seabird foraging behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Phillips
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
- Ocean Networks Canada, 2474 Arbutus Road, Victoria, BC V8N 1V8, Canada
| | - Tim Guilford
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Annette L Fayet
- Department of Zoology, Oxford University, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Høgskoleringen 9, 7034 Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eby A, Patterson A, Sorenson G, Lazarus T, Whelan S, Elliott KH, Gilchrist HG, Love OP. Lower nutritional state and foraging success in an Arctic seabird despite behaviorally flexible responses to environmental change. Ecol Evol 2023; 13:e9923. [PMID: 37091555 PMCID: PMC10119025 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The degree to which individuals adjust foraging behavior in response to environmental variability can impact foraging success, leading to downstream impacts on fitness and population dynamics. We examined the foraging flexibility, average daily energy expenditure, and foraging success of an ice-associated Arctic seabird, the thick-billed murre (Uria lomvia) in response to broad-scale environmental conditions at two different-sized, low Arctic colonies located <300 km apart. First, we compared foraging behavior (measured via GPS units), average daily energy expenditure (estimated from GPS derived activity budgets), and foraging success (nutritional state measured via nutritional biomarkers pre- and post- GPS deployment) of murres at two colonies, which differ greatly in size: 30,000 pairs breed on Coats Island, Nunavut, and 400,000 pairs breed on Digges Island, Nunavut. Second, we tested whether colony size within the same marine ecosystem altered foraging behavior in response to broad-scale environmental variability. Third, we tested whether environmentally induced foraging flexibility influenced the foraging success of murres. Murres at the larger colony foraged farther and longer but made fewer trips, resulting in a lower nutritional state and lower foraging success compared to birds at the smaller colony. Foraging behavior and foraging success varied in response to environmental variation, with murres at both colonies making longer, more distant foraging trips in high ice regimes during incubation, suggesting flexibility in responding to environmental variability. However, only birds at the larger colony showed this same flexibility during chick rearing. Foraging success at both colonies was higher during high ice regimes, suggesting greater prey availability. Overall, murres from the larger colony exhibited lower foraging success, and their foraging behavior showed stronger responses to changes in broad-scale conditions such as sea ice regime. Taken together, this suggests that larger Arctic seabird colonies have higher behavioral and demographic sensitivity to environmental change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa Eby
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorOntarioN9B 3P4Canada
| | - Allison Patterson
- Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySte Anne‐de‐BellevueQuebecH9X 3V9Canada
| | - Graham Sorenson
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorOntarioN9B 3P4Canada
- Present address:
Atlantic Region OfficeBirds CanadaSackvilleNew BrunswickE4L 1G6Canada
| | - Thomas Lazarus
- Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySte Anne‐de‐BellevueQuebecH9X 3V9Canada
| | - Shannon Whelan
- Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySte Anne‐de‐BellevueQuebecH9X 3V9Canada
| | - Kyle H. Elliott
- Department of Natural Resource SciencesMcGill UniversitySte Anne‐de‐BellevueQuebecH9X 3V9Canada
| | - H. Grant Gilchrist
- Environment and Climate Change CanadaNational Wildlife Research Centre1125 Colonel By Drive, Raven RoadOttawaOntarioK1A OH3Canada
| | - Oliver P. Love
- Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of WindsorWindsorOntarioN9B 3P4Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Anker‐Nilssen T, Fayet AL, Aarvak T. Top‐down control of a marine mesopredator: Increase in native white‐tailed eagles accelerates the extinction of an endangered seabird population. J Appl Ecol 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
5
|
Keogan K, Daunt F, Wanless S, Phillips RA, Alvarez D, Anker-Nilssen T, Barrett RT, Bech C, Becker PH, Berglund PA, Bouwhuis S, Burr ZM, Chastel O, Christensen-Dalsgaard S, Descamps S, Diamond T, Elliott K, Erikstad KE, Harris M, Hentati-Sundberg J, Heubeck M, Kress SW, Langset M, Lorentsen SH, Major HL, Mallory M, Mellor M, Miles WTS, Moe B, Mostello C, Newell M, Nisbet I, Reiertsen TK, Rock J, Shannon P, Varpe Ø, Lewis S, Phillimore AB. Variation and correlation in the timing of breeding of North Atlantic seabirds across multiple scales. J Anim Ecol 2022; 91:1797-1812. [PMID: 35675093 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Timing of breeding, an important driver of fitness in many populations, is widely studied in the context of global change, yet despite considerable efforts to identify environmental drivers of seabird nesting phenology, for most populations we lack evidence of strong drivers. Here we adopt an alternative approach, examining the degree to which different populations positively covary in their annual phenology to infer whether phenological responses to environmental drivers are likely to be (a) shared across species at a range of spatial scales, (b) shared across populations of a species or (c) idiosyncratic to populations. We combined 51 long-term datasets on breeding phenology spanning 50 years from nine seabird species across 29 North Atlantic sites and examined the extent to which different populations share early versus late breeding seasons depending on a hierarchy of spatial scales comprising breeding site, small-scale region, large-scale region and the whole North Atlantic. In about a third of cases, we found laying dates of populations of different species sharing the same breeding site or small-scale breeding region were positively correlated, which is consistent with the hypothesis that they share phenological responses to the same environmental conditions. In comparison, we found no evidence for positive phenological covariation among populations across species aggregated at larger spatial scales. In general, we found little evidence for positive phenological covariation between populations of a single species, and in many instances the inter-year variation specific to a population was substantial, consistent with each population responding idiosyncratically to local environmental conditions. Black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla was the exception, with populations exhibiting positive covariation in laying dates that decayed with the distance between breeding sites, suggesting that populations may be responding to a similar driver. Our approach sheds light on the potential factors that may drive phenology in our study species, thus furthering our understanding of the scales at which different seabirds interact with interannual variation in their environment. We also identify additional systems and phenological questions to which our inferential approach could be applied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine Keogan
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | | | - Richard A Phillips
- British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Robert T Barrett
- Department of Natural Sciences, Tromsø University Museum, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Claus Bech
- Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | | | - Zofia M Burr
- Department of Arctic Biology, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway
| | - Olivier Chastel
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS-ULR, Villiers en Bois, France
| | | | - Sebastien Descamps
- Norwegian Polar Institute, High North Research Centre for Climate and the Environment, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Tony Diamond
- University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Kyle Elliott
- Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kjell-Einar Erikstad
- Department of Natural Sciences, Tromsø University Museum, Tromsø, Norway.,Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Fram Centre Tromsø, Norway.,Centre for Conservation Biology, Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mike Harris
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Penicuik, UK
| | - Jonas Hentati-Sundberg
- Department of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Heubeck
- Aberdeen Institute of Coastal Science and Management, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Stephen W Kress
- National Audubon Society Seabird Institute, Bremen, Maine, USA
| | | | | | - Heather L Major
- University of New Brunswick, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Mark Mallory
- Biology, Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mick Mellor
- SOETAG, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Will T S Miles
- SOETAG, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Børge Moe
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
| | - Carolyn Mostello
- Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Newell
- Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Penicuik, UK
| | - Ian Nisbet
- I. C. T. Nisbet & Company, North Falmouth, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tone Kirstin Reiertsen
- Department of Natural Sciences, Tromsø University Museum, Tromsø, Norway.,Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Fram Centre Tromsø, Norway
| | - Jennifer Rock
- Environment and Climate Change Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Sackville, New Brunswick, Canada
| | - Paula Shannon
- National Audubon Society Seabird Institute, Bremen, Maine, USA
| | - Øystein Varpe
- Department of Arctic Biology, The University Centre in Svalbard, Longyearbyen, Norway.,Norwegian Institute of Nature Research (NINA), Bergen, Norway.,Department of Biological Sciences, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Sue Lewis
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, UK.,Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Penicuik, UK.,Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Albert B Phillimore
- Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Acker P, Schaub M, Besnard A, Monnat JY, Cam E. Can attraction to and competition for high-quality habitats shape breeding propensity? J Anim Ecol 2022; 91:933-945. [PMID: 35157311 PMCID: PMC9314844 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
In many animal species, sexually mature individuals may skip breeding opportunities despite a likely negative impact on fitness. In spatio‐temporally heterogeneous environments, habitat selection theory predicts that individuals select habitats where fitness prospects are maximized. Individuals are attracted to high‐quality habitat patches where they compete for high‐quality breeding sites. Since failures in contests to secure a site may prevent individuals from breeding, we hypothesized that attraction to and competition for high‐quality habitats could shape breeding propensity. Under this hypothesis, we predicted the two following associations between breeding propensity and two key population features. (1) When mean habitat quality in the population increases in multiple patches such that availability of high‐quality sites increases across the population, the resulting decrease in competition should positively affect breeding propensity. (2) When the number of individuals increases in the population, the resulting increase in competitors should negatively affect breeding propensity (negative density dependence). Using long‐term data from kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla, we checked the prerequisite of prediction (1), that availability of high‐quality sites is positively associated with current mean habitat quality in the population (represented by breeding success). We then applied integrated population modelling to quantify annual fluctuations in population mean breeding success, breeding propensity and number of individuals by breeding status (pre‐breeders, breeders, skippers and immigrants), and tested our predictions. Our results showed that breeding propensity acts as an important driver of population growth. As expected, breeding propensity was positively associated with preceding mean habitat quality in the population, and negatively with the number of competitors. These relationships varied depending on breeding status, which likely reflects status dependence in competitive ability. These findings highlight the importance of competition for high‐quality breeding sites in shaping breeding propensity. Thereby, we draw attention towards alternative and complementary explanations to more standard considerations regarding the energetic cost of reproduction, and point to possible side effects of habitat selection behaviours on individual life histories and population dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Acker
- Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics, Institutt for Biologi, NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.,Laboratoire EDB (UMR 5174), Université Paul Sabatier - CNRS - IRD; 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse, France.,CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | - Michael Schaub
- Swiss Ornithological Institute; CH-6204, Sempach, Switzerland
| | - Aurélien Besnard
- CEFE, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE-PSL University, IRD, Univ Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Emmanuelle Cam
- Laboratoire EDB (UMR 5174), Université Paul Sabatier - CNRS - IRD; 118 route de Narbonne, Toulouse, France.,Univ Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, LEMAR, F-29280, Plouzané, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fine-scale spatial segregation in a pelagic seabird driven by differential use of tidewater glacier fronts. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22109. [PMID: 34764330 PMCID: PMC8586018 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01404-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In colonially breeding marine predators, individual movements and colonial segregation are influenced by seascape characteristics. Tidewater glacier fronts are important features of the Arctic seascape and are often described as foraging hotspots. Albeit their documented importance for wildlife, little is known about their structuring effect on Arctic predator movements and space use. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that tidewater glacier fronts can influence marine bird foraging patterns and drive spatial segregation among adjacent colonies. We analysed movements of black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) in a glacial fjord by tracking breeding individuals from five colonies. Although breeding kittiwakes were observed to travel up to ca. 280 km from the colony, individuals were more likely to use glacier fronts located closer to their colony and rarely used glacier fronts located farther away than 18 km. Such variation in the use of glacier fronts created fine-scale spatial segregation among the four closest (ca. 7 km distance on average) kittiwake colonies. Overall, our results support the hypothesis that spatially predictable foraging patches like glacier fronts can have strong structuring effects on predator movements and can modulate the magnitude of intercolonial spatial segregation in central-place foragers.
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
This paper aimed to explore and clarify the concept of behavioral flexibility. A selective literature review explored how the concept of behavioral flexibility has been used in ways that range from acknowledging the fact that animals’ behavior is not always bounded by instinctual constraints, to describing the variation between species in their capacity for innovative foraging, a capacity that has repeatedly been linked to having a brain larger than would be predicted from body size. This wide range of usages of a single term has led to some conceptual confusion. We sought to find a more precise meaning for behavioral flexibility by representing it within a simple formal model of problem solving. The key to our model is to distinguish between an animal’s state of knowledge about the world and its observable behavior, using a construct of response strength to represent that underlying knowledge. We modelled behavioral flexibility as a parameter in the function that transforms response strengths into observable response probabilities. We tested this model in simulations based on some recent experimental work on animal problem solving. Initial results showed that parametric manipulation can mimic some of the behavioral effects that have been attributed to flexibility.
Collapse
|
9
|
Trevail AM, Green JA, Sharples J, Polton JA, Miller PI, Daunt F, Owen E, Bolton M, Colhoun K, Newton S, Robertson G, Patrick SC. Environmental heterogeneity decreases reproductive success via effects on foraging behaviour. Proc Biol Sci 2019; 286:20190795. [PMID: 31161906 PMCID: PMC6571457 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Environmental heterogeneity shapes the uneven distribution of resources available to foragers, and is ubiquitous in nature. Optimal foraging theory predicts that an animal's ability to exploit resource patches is key to foraging success. However, the potential fitness costs and benefits of foraging in a heterogeneous environment are difficult to measure empirically. Heterogeneity may provide higher-quality foraging opportunities, or alternatively could increase the cost of resource acquisition because of reduced patch density or increased competition. Here, we study the influence of physical environmental heterogeneity on behaviour and reproductive success of black-legged kittiwakes, Rissa tridactyla. From GPS tracking data at 15 colonies throughout their British and Irish range, we found that environments that were physically more heterogeneous were associated with longer trip duration, more time spent foraging while away from the colony, increased overlap of foraging areas between individuals and lower breeding success. These results suggest that there is greater competition between individuals for finite resources in more heterogeneous environments, which comes at a cost to reproduction. Resource hotspots are often considered beneficial, as individuals can learn to exploit them if sufficiently predictable. However, we demonstrate here that such fitness gains can be countered by greater competition in more heterogeneous environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice M Trevail
- 1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
| | - Jonathan A Green
- 1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
| | - Jonathan Sharples
- 1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
| | | | - Peter I Miller
- 3 Remote Sensing Group, Plymouth Marine Laboratory , Plymouth , UK
| | - Francis Daunt
- 4 Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Edinburgh , Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian , UK
| | - Ellie Owen
- 5 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB Scotland, Etive House, Beechwood Park, Inverness , UK
| | - Mark Bolton
- 6 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science , The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire , UK
| | - Kendrew Colhoun
- 7 RSPB Centre for Conservation Science , Belfast , UK.,8 School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin , Bellfield, Dublin 4 , Ireland
| | | | - Gail Robertson
- 10 School of Mathematics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh , UK
| | - Samantha C Patrick
- 1 School of Environmental Sciences, University of Liverpool , Liverpool , UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gardarsson A, Jónsson JE. Numbers and distribution of the Great Cormorant in Iceland: Limitation at the regional and metapopulation level. Ecol Evol 2019; 9:3984-4000. [PMID: 31015982 PMCID: PMC6468091 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
We studied a metapopulation of great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo) in Iceland, using complete aerial censuses of nests in 25 years during 1975-2015. Age composition was estimated in 1998-2014 by ground surveys in September and February. Brood size was estimated from aerial photographs in 2007-2015.Weather, food, breeding habitat, and density were considered as explanatory variables when examining numerical and distributional changes in the cormorant metapopulation.In 1975-1990 total nest numbers changed little, very low numbers about 1992 were followed by an annual increase of 3.5% in 1994-2015. Total nest numbers were positively correlated with estimates of spawning stocks of cod and saithe and inversely related to the subpolar gyre index (SPG-I).During the increase in 1994-2015, average colony size at first increased and then declined. Habitat use also changed: the proportion of nests on small rocky islets (skerries) at first declined, from 69% to 44% in 1995-2003 and then increased again to about 58% in 2012-2014. Habitat changes were probably a response to changed patterns of human disturbance.Breeding density, as nests per km2 sea <20 m deep, was rather uniform among five defined regions in 1975-1996. Thereafter, densities became much higher in two sheltered regions with kelp forests and in one mostly exposed region. A second exposed region remained low and in the third nest numbers declined markedly. Thus, carrying capacity was higher in sheltered regions where cormorant breeding had historically been depressed by human disturbance.Brood size varied little among regions but declined with the years from about 2.5 to 1.8.The proportion of juveniles in September (fecundity) declined in 1998-2015 from over 0.4 to 0.3 and was inversely correlated with year and nest numbers, if outlier years were excluded, suggesting resource limitation. Survival of juvenile cormorants in September-February was estimated at 0.471 ± 0.066 SE. Commercial fish stocks and climate indices were not correlated with the proportion of juveniles.Annual survival of adults (breeding and nonbreeding) was estimated from nest counts and age composition 1999-2014, as 0.850 ± 0.026 SE and showed no trend in 1998-2014.We conclude that the metapopulation of cormorants in Iceland was resource-limited at two levels: fecundity at the regional and winter survival at the total level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arnthor Gardarsson
- Institute of Biological and Environmental SciencesUniversity of IcelandReykjavikIceland
| | - Jón Einar Jónsson
- Research Centre at SnæfellsnesUniversity of IcelandStykkishólmurIceland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Christensen-Dalsgaard S, May R, Lorentsen SH. Taking a trip to the shelf: Behavioral decisions are mediated by the proximity to foraging habitats in the black-legged kittiwake. Ecol Evol 2017; 8:866-878. [PMID: 29375761 PMCID: PMC5773323 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
For marine top predators like seabirds, the oceans represent a multitude of habitats regarding oceanographic conditions and food availability. Worldwide, these marine habitats are being altered by changes in climate and increased anthropogenic impact. This is causing a growing concern on how seabird populations might adapt to these changes. Understanding how seabird populations respond to fluctuating environmental conditions and to what extent behavioral flexibility can buffer variations in food availability can help predict how seabirds may cope with changes in the marine environment. Such knowledge is important to implement proper long‐term conservation measures intended to protect marine predators. We explored behavioral flexibility in choice of foraging habitat of chick‐rearing black‐legged kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla during multiple years. By comparing foraging behavior of individuals from two colonies with large differences in oceanographic conditions and distances to predictable feeding areas at the Norwegian shelf break, we investigated how foraging decisions are related to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. We found that proximity to the shelf break determined which factors drove the decision to forage there. At the colony near the shelf break, time of departure from the colony and wind speed were most important in driving the choice of habitat. At the colony farther from the shelf break, the decision to forage there was driven by adult body condition. Birds furthermore adjusted foraging behavior metrics according to time of the day, weather conditions, body condition, and the age of the chicks. The study shows that kittiwakes have high degree of flexibility in their behavioral response to a variable marine environment, which might help them buffer changes in prey distribution around the colonies. The flexibility is, however, dependent on the availability of foraging habitats near the colony.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Signe Christensen-Dalsgaard
- Department of Biology Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Trondheim Norway.,Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway
| | - Roel May
- Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA) Trondheim Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|