"Keeping it on your radar"-assessing the barriers and facilitators to a timely diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in childhood: A qualitative study from the early detection of type 1 diabetes in youth study

Have interventions aimed at assisting general practitioners in facilitating earlier diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children been successful in preventing acute complications? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening emergency that can result from delayed diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Three-quarters of Australian children with a new diagnosis of T1DM visit their general practitioner (GP) the week prior to developing DKA, with similar trends observed internationally.

OBJECTIVE

To summarise interventions in general practice to reduce diagnostic delay in paediatric T1DM and to evaluate their effectiveness.

METHODS

Six databases (Ovid, Web of Science, CINAHL, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, Google Scholar and EMBASE) were searched. Any English language, less than 20 years study involving interventions targeting GPs specifically in the prevention of paediatric DKA, was included. Primary outcomes were (a) the number of children presenting to the hospital in DKA following diagnostic delay after a GP visit and (b) DKA rate. The secondary outcome was changes in GPs' behaviour regarding timeliness of referrals. Two reviewers completed title, abstract and full-text review, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. ROBINS-I risk of bias was used for appraisal. High heterogeneity among studies rendered meta-analysis unsuitable. Structured tabulation of results was completed for analysis. The date of last search was 2 July 2023.

RESULTS

Eight studies were included (three conference abstracts and five peer-reviewed publications.) We identified six intervention types attempting to facilitate timely diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in the general practice setting: direct communication, indirect communication, education sessions, electronic clinical decision support tools, updated referral pathways and provision of glucose and/or ketone monitors. Due to the limited number of peer-reviewed studies identified by this review, we were not able to identify the extent to which these interventions were successful.

CONCLUSION

Paucity of information regarding study methodology and high heterogeneity among study design and outcome measures limited our conclusions regarding acceptability, effectiveness and reach. Future studies should include GPs in their design and consider the sustainability of interventions in the long term.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023412504.

Exploring the User Acceptability and Feasibility of a Clinical Decision Support Tool Designed to Facilitate Timely Diagnosis of New-Onset Type 1 Diabetes in Children: Qualitative Interview Study Among General Practitioners

BACKGROUND

Up to half of the children with new-onset type 1 diabetes present to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis, a life-threatening condition that can develop because of diagnostic delay. Three-quarters of Australian children visit their general practitioner (GP) the week before presenting to the hospital with diabetic ketoacidosis. Our prototype, DIRECT-T1DM (Decision-Support for Integrated, Real-Time Evaluation and Clinical Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus), is an electronic clinical decision support tool that promotes immediate point-of-care testing in general practice to confirm the suspicion of diabetes. This avoids laboratory testing, which has been documented internationally as a cause of diagnostic delay.

OBJECTIVE

In this investigation, we aimed to pilot and assess the feasibility and acceptability of our prototype to GP end users. We also explored the challenges of diagnosing type 1 diabetes in the Australian general practice context.

METHODS

In total, 4 GPs, a pediatric endocrinologist, and a PhD candidate were involved in conceptualizing the DIRECT-T1DM prototype, which was developed at the Department of General Practice and Primary Care at the University of Melbourne. Furthermore, 6 GPs were recruited via convenience sampling to evaluate the tool. The study involved 3 phases: a presimulation interview, simulated clinical scenarios, and a postsimulation interview. The interview guide was developed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide. All phases of the study were video, audio, and screen recorded. Audio recordings were transcribed by the investigating team. Analysis was carried out using CFIR as the underlying framework.

RESULTS

Major themes were identified among three domains and 7 constructs of the CFIR: (1) outer setting-time pressure, difficulty in diagnosing pediatric type 1 diabetes, and secondary care considerations influenced GPs' needs regarding DIRECT-T1DM; (2) inner setting-DIRECT-T1DM fits within existing workflows, it has a high relative priority due to its importance in patient safety, and GPs exhibited high tension for change; and (3) innovation-design recommendations included altering coloring to reflect urgency, font style and bolding, specific language, information and guidelines, and inclusion of patient information sheets.

CONCLUSIONS

End-user acceptability of DIRECT-T1DM was high. This was largely due to its implications for patient safety and its "real-time" nature. DIRECT-T1DM may assist in appropriate management of children with new-onset diabetes, which is an uncommon event in general practice, through safety netting.

'Never once was I thinking the c-word': Parent perspectives on the facilitators and barriers to getting a childhood cancer diagnosis

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To describe the facilitators and barriers of getting from 'something's not right' to a childhood cancer diagnosis from the perspective of parents living in the United States of America.

BACKGROUND

It is common for families to experience long trajectories from when they first notice symptoms to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. Understanding this trajectory within the social and cultural contexts of the United States healthcare system is the first step in developing strategies for reducing this timeframe and mitigating some of the psychosocial impact for parents in receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. This study examines the interpretations and meanings parents attributed to their child's symptoms, their decisions regarding seeking medical care, interactions with healthcare providers and the time course of events.

DESIGN

An inductive qualitative inquiry.

METHODS

In-depth, semi-structured interviews with 55 participants representing 39 unique cases of childhood cancer were conducted. Data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach. COREQ guidelines were followed.

RESULTS

Participants described multiple barriers and facilitators in their path to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis. Facilitators included noticing something 'wasn't right' and physician in agreement that symptoms were unusual; acute symptoms requiring action; advocating for a diagnosis; and obtaining a second opinion. Barriers included parents having to interpret symptoms in the context of daily life; physician dismissiveness even when symptoms persisted; and not feeling they could question their physician's assessment.

CONCLUSION

Families experience multiple facilitators and barriers in their trajectory to receiving a childhood cancer diagnosis.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Understanding the path to diagnosis from the parent perspective may increase opportunities for shared decision-making. Clinician educational modules that include family perspectives may improve patient/parent-provider relationships.

PARTICIPANT CONTRIBUTION

Participants described their family's cancer journey through narrative storytelling. Participants had the opportunity to review and make edits to their transcript.

Presentation to primary care during the prodrome of type 1 diabetes in childhood: A case-control study using record data linkage

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate primary care presentations during the prodrome (12 months prior to onset type-1 diabetes (T1D), with or without diabetic ketoacidosis [DKA]), to identify opportunities for earlier diagnosis.

METHODS

This was a case-control study, linking 16 years of data from children (≤15 years) registered at diagnosis of T1D, and routinely collected primary care records in Wales (United Kingdom). Controls (without T1D) were matched on a 3:1 ratio. Conditional logistic regression modeling was used to compare characteristics occurring in cases (children with T1D) and controls; and cases that presented with/without DKA.

RESULTS

A total of 1345 children with T1D (19% DKA) and 4035 controls were identified. During the 12 months prior to diagnosis, cases were 6.5 times more likely to have at least one primary care contact (P < 0.001). One to 30 days prior to diagnosis, contacts relating to blood tests, fungal conditions, respiratory tract infections (RTIs), urinary conditions, vomiting, and weight were independently associated with T1D, as were contacts relating to blood tests, between 91 and 180 days prior to diagnosis. Children with a contact up to a month prior to diagnosis, relating to RTIs, antibiotic prescriptions, and vomiting, were more likely to present in DKA, as were boys (P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

There are opportunities in primary care for an earlier diagnosis of T1D in childhood. These data could be used to create a predictive diagnostic tool, as a potential aid for primary care health professionals, to prevent presentation in DKA.