Time-sensitive approach in the management of acute heart failure

Time to intravenous diuretic administration in patients hospitalized with heart failure: An observational study

AIMS

To help establish optimized treatment strategies for congestion in patients with acute heart failure, this study aimed to provide a detailed summary of real-world diuretic use in hospitalized patients with heart failure requiring urgent therapy in Japan.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This observational study used a Japanese medical records database to extract data of patients admitted to hospital with a heart failure diagnosis and an intravenous diuretic prescription from the day before admission to 2 days after. Time from hospital visit to first dose, second dose, and maximum dose of intravenous diuretics were determined. Patients were grouped according to whether they received diuretic modification, defined as an intravenous diuretic dose increase or concomitant use of other diuretics.

RESULTS

Overall, 1577 patients were included in the study (without diuretic modification, n = 1140 [72.3%]; with diuretic modification, n = 437 [27.7%]). The study population was 49.5% female (n = 780) and the mean age ± standard deviation was 80.1 ± 12.7 years. Intravenous diuretic treatment was received within 1 h of their hospital visit in 43.5% of patients (686/1577) and ≤2 h in 16.4% of patients (258/1577). Among 437 patients with an inadequate response following their first dose, 42.1% received an intravenous dose titration, 56.5% received combination diuretics, and 1.4% received both. Over half of the patients (59.0% [258/437]) with diuretic modification received it after the first 24 h of the hospital visit. The median time from hospital visit to first dose titration was similar to time to first combination diuretic use (18.6 h and 17.0 h, respectively). The mean ± standard deviation duration of intravenous diuretic use was significantly longer for patients with versus without diuretic modification (6.3 ± 5.2 vs. 3.7 ± 3.2 days), and a significantly greater proportion of patients (44.6% [195/437] vs. 35.0% [399/1140]) received repeated intravenous diuretic administration. Other characteristics/outcomes of intravenous diuretic use were similar with versus without diuretic modification, including in-hospital death (15.6% [68/437] vs. 13.9% [159/1140]) and mean ± standard deviation length of hospitalization (21.9 ± 14.7 days vs. 22.1 ± 21.2 days).

CONCLUSIONS

In Japan, real-world patterns of intravenous diuretic administration for patients with heart failure remains far from the time-sensitive approach recommended in Japanese, European, and United States guidelines.

Thin-Film Piezoelectric Micromachined Ultrasound Transducers in Biomedical Applications: A Review

Thin-film piezoelectric micromachined ultrasound transducers (PMUTs) are an increasingly relevant and well-researched field, and their biomedical importance has been growing as the technology continues to mature. This review article briefly discusses their history in biomedical use, provides a simple explanation of their principles for newer readers, and sheds light on the materials selection for these devices. Primarily, it discusses the significant applications of PMUTs in the biomedical industry and showcases recent progress that has been made in each application. The biomedical applications covered include common historical uses of ultrasound such as ultrasound imaging, ultrasound therapy, and fluid sensing, but additionally new and upcoming applications such as drug delivery, photoacoustic imaging, thermoacoustic imaging, biometrics, and intrabody communication. By including a device comparison chart for different applications, this review aims to assist microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) designers that work with PMUTs by providing a benchmark for recent research works. Furthermore, it puts forth a discussion on the current challenges being faced by PMUTs in the biomedical field, current and likely future research trends, and opportunities for PMUT development areas, as well as sharing the opinions and predictions of the authors on the state of this technology as a whole. The review aims to be a comprehensive introduction to these topics without diving excessively deep into existing literature.

The Management of Cardiogenic Shock From Diagnosis to Devices: A Narrative Review

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogenous syndrome broadly characterized by inadequate cardiac output leading to tissue hypoperfusion and multisystem organ dysfunction that carries an ongoing high mortality burden. The management of CS has advanced rapidly, especially with the incorporation of temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS) devices. A thorough understanding of how to approach a patient with CS and to select appropriate monitoring and treatment paradigms is essential in modern ICUs. Timely characterization of CS severity and hemodynamics is necessary to optimize outcomes, and this may be performed best by multidisciplinary shock-focused teams. In this article, we provide a review of CS aimed to inform both the cardiology-trained and non-cardiology-trained intensivist provider. We briefly describe the causes, pathophysiologic features, diagnosis, and severity staging of CS, focusing on gathering key information that is necessary for making management decisions. We go on to provide a more detailed review of CS management principles and practical applications, with a focus on tMCS. Medical management focuses on appropriate medication therapy to optimize perfusion-by enhancing contractility and minimizing afterload-and to facilitate decongestion. For more severe CS, or for patients with decompensating hemodynamic status despite medical therapy, initiation of the appropriate tMCS increasingly is common. We discuss the most common devices currently used for patients with CS-phenotyping patients as having left ventricular failure, right ventricular failure, or biventricular failure-and highlight key available data and particular points of consideration that inform tMCS device selection. Finally, we highlight core components of sedation and respiratory failure management for patients with CS.

Endothelial Dysfunction in Heart Failure: What Is Its Role?

The endothelium is a continuous layer of cells that coats the interior walls of arteries, capillaries, and veins. It has an essential regulatory role in hemostatic function, vascular tone, inflammation, and platelet activity. Endothelial dysfunction is characterized by a shift to a proinflammatory and prothrombic state, and it could have a bidirectional relationship with heart failure (HF). Due to neurohormonal activation and shear stress, HFrEF may promote endothelial dysfunction, increase ROS synthesis, and reduce nitric oxide production. Different studies have also shown that endothelium function is damaged in HFpEF because of a systemic inflammatory state. Some clinical trials suggest that drugs that have an effect on endothelial dysfunction in patients with HF or cardiovascular disease may be a therapeutic option. The aim of this review is to highlight the pathogenetic correlation between endothelial dysfunction and heart failure and the related potential therapeutic options.

Predictors of a Good Diuretic Response and Administration Methods for Carperitide in Patients With Acute Heart Failure

PURPOSE

In Japan, carperitide has been recommended for the treatment of pulmonary congestion in patients with acute heart failure. Identifying useful indicators to support the decision to administer carperitide and the optimal timing of administration may lead to better improvement of pulmonary congestion. Therefore, we investigated the factors associated with good diuretic response to carperitide in patients with acute heart failure and the optimal timing of carperitide administration.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study investigated 293 hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with acute heart failure and treated with carperitide at the Department of Cardiology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital. The primary endpoint was the diuretic response to carperitide. Patients with urine output ≥100 mL/h were defined as the good diuretic response group, and those with a urine output <100 mL/h during the first 6 hours of carperitide administration were defined as the poor diuretic response group. Multivariate analysis was used to examine the predictors of good diuretic response. The relationship between the time from intravenous furosemide to carperitide administration and urine output was also investigated.

FINDINGS

The patients' median age was 77 (range: 28-99) years, and 75.5% had New York Heart Association stage IV acute heart failure. The median urine output within 6 hours of carperitide administration was 104.5 (range: 6.6-1571.3) mL/h, and 118 patients (53.6%) showed a good diuretic response. Significant predictors of good diuretic response were age < 75 years [odds ratio (OR) 4.186; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.129-8.230; P < 0.001], no prior use of loop diuretics (OR 2.155; 95% CI, 1.104-4.207; P = 0.024), blood urea nitrogen <20 mg/dL (OR 2.637; 95% CI, 1.340-5.190; P = 0.005), and white blood cell count <8.6 × 109/L (OR 3.162; 95% CI, 1.628-6.140; P = 0.001). The median urine output in the group with <2 hours between intravenous furosemide and carperitide administration was significantly higher than that in the group with an interval >6 hours [127.3; interquartile range (IQR), 77.6-216.2 mL/h vs. 66.2; IQR. 51.8-114.8 mL/h; P = 0.012).

IMPLICATIONS

The 4 predictors (age, no prior use of loop diuretics, blood urea nitrogen, and white blood cell count) of good diuretic response are useful indicators to support decision-making for carperitide administration. Additionally, the administration of carperitide within 2 hours of intravenous furosemide may lead to the improvement of pulmonary congestion.

Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is a complex and diverse pathological condition characterized by reduced myocardial contractility. The goal of treatment of cardiogenic shock is to improve abnormal hemodynamics and maintain adequate tissue perfusion in organs. If hypotension and insufficient tissue perfusion persist despite initial therapy, temporary mechanical circulatory support (t-MCS) should be initiated. This decade sees the beginning of a new era of cardiogenic shock management using t-MCS through the accumulated experience with use of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), as well as new revolutionary devices or systems such as transvalvular axial flow pump (Impella) and a combination of VA-ECMO and Impella (ECPELLA) based on the knowledge of circulatory physiology. In this transitional period, we outline the approach to the management of cardiogenic shock by t-MCS. The management strategy involves carefully selecting one or a combination of the t-MCS devices, taking into account the characteristics of each device and the specific pathological condition. This selection is guided by monitoring of hemodynamics, classification of shock stage, risk stratification, and coordinated management by the multidisciplinary shock team.

Effects of door-to-tolvaptan time on short-term clinical outcome in patients with acute heart failure

AIMS

We investigated the effects of door-to-tolvaptan (D2T) time on short-term urine volume and in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with AHF, treated with tolvaptan at two hospitals, were enrolled in this retrospective observational study. The D2T time was defined as the time elapsed from the arrival of a patient at a participating hospital to the first administration of tolvaptan. The group with the D2T time within 6 h was defined as the 'early group'. The primary outcome was 48-h urine volume. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital death, length of hospital stay, and worsening renal function (WRF) incidence. A restricted cubic spline model was used to evaluate the presence of a nonlinear association between the D2T time and 48-h urine volume and the odds ratio of WRF incidence. Our study included a total of 138 patients with AHF who were started on tolvaptan after hospitalization. The median D2T time was 5.3 h (interquartile range: 3.0-31.9 h). Seventy-four patients (53.6%) were classified to be in the early group. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups: mean age (85.4 ± 9.6 years vs. 84.5 ± 9.5 years; P = 0.59) and male sex (n = 22 [33.3%] vs. n = 29 [46%]; P = 0.16), except that patients in the early group had higher systolic blood pressure than those in the delayed group (138.2 ± 22.9 vs. 125.7 ± 21.7; P = 0.001). The initial tolvaptan dose in the delayed group was much lower than that in the early group (7.5 [7.5, 7.5] vs. 7.5 [5.6, 7.5] mg; P = 0.01). Total urine volume in 48 h did not differ in the early and delayed groups (4113 ± 1758 mL vs. 4201 ± 1893 mL; P = 0.80). The relationship between D2T time and total urine volume within 48 h increased slightly, with a peak at a D2T time of 15 h, and gradually decreased, thereafter. In-hospital death and the length of hospital stay did not differ significantly between the two groups (n = 1, 1.3% vs. n = 4, 6.3%; P = 0.18, and 5.0 [12.0, 30.0] vs. 22.0 [14.5, 30.0] days; P = 0.17, respectively). Notably, the restricted cubic spline model for the odds ratio of WRF incidence increased as the D2T time was delayed (P for effect<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The shorter D2T time did not affect the short-term urine volume and in-hospital outcomes but reduced the risk of WRF incidence in patients with AHF.

Acute heart failure: mechanisms and pre-clinical models-a Scientific Statement of the ESC Working Group on Myocardial Function

While chronic heart failure (CHF) treatment has considerably improved patient prognosis and survival, the therapeutic management of acute heart failure (AHF) has remained virtually unchanged in the last decades. This is partly due to the scarcity of pre-clinical models for the pathophysiological assessment and, consequently, the limited knowledge of molecular mechanisms involved in the different AHF phenotypes. This scientific statement outlines the different trajectories from acute to CHF originating from the interaction between aetiology, genetic and environmental factors, and comorbidities. Furthermore, we discuss the potential molecular targets capable of unveiling new therapeutic perspectives to improve the outcome of the acute phase and counteracting the evolution towards CHF.

Acute heart failure: differential diagnosis and treatment

Acute heart failure is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome and is the first cause of unplanned hospitalization in people >65 years. Patients with heart failure may have different clinical presentations according to clinical history, pre-existing heart disease, and pattern of intravascular congestion. A comprehensive assessment of clinical, echocardiographic, and laboratory data should aid in clinical decision-making and treatment. In some cases, a more accurate evaluation of patient haemodynamics via a pulmonary artery catheter may be necessary to undertake and guide escalation and de-escalation of therapy, especially when clinical, echo, and laboratory data are inconclusive or in the presence of right ventricular dysfunction. Similarly, a pulmonary artery catheter may be useful in patients with cardiogenic shock undergoing mechanical circulatory support. With the subsequent de-escalation of therapy and haemodynamic stabilization, the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy should be pursued to reduce the risk of subsequent heart failure hospitalization and death, paying particular attention to the recognition and treatment of residual congestion.

Impact of the time-to-target rate of urine volume concept on the outcome of acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Early decongestion with diuretics could improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to examine the impact of the time-to-target rate of urine volume (T2TUV) concept on the outcome of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 1670 patients with ADHF who received diuretics within 24 h of admission. T2TUV was defined as the time from admission to the rate of urine volume of 100 ml/h. The primary outcomes were in-hospital death, mortality, and re-hospitalization for 1 year.

RESULTS

A total of 789 patients met the inclusion criteria (T2TUV on day 1, n = 248; day 2-3, n = 172; no target rate UV, n = 369). In-hospital mortality in the day 1 group was significantly lower (2.7% vs. 5.9% vs. 11.1%; p < 0.001) than that of other groups. The mortality and re-hospitalization for 1 year in the day 1 group was significantly lower (event-free rate: 67.7% vs. 54.1% vs. 56.9%; log-lank p = 0.004) than that of other groups. In multivariate analysis, predictors of T2TUV at day 1 were age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.007), previous hospitalized heart failure (OR: 1.47, 95% CI: [1.03-2.12], p = 0.03), N-terminal-pro B type natriuretic peptide per 1000 pg/ml (OR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.04, p = 0.007), carperitide (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.48-0.99, p = 0.05), and early administration of tolvaptan (OR: 0.6, 95% CI: 0.42-0.85, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

T2TUV of less than day 1 was associated with lower in-hospital mortality and decreased mortality and re-hospitalization at 1 year.

Predictors of Poor Very Early Diuretic Response and Effectiveness of Early Tolvaptan in Symptomatic Acute Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Diuretic response (DR) in patients with symptomatic acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has an impact on prognosis. This study aimed to identify predictive factors influencing acute 6 h poor DR and to assess DR after early administration of tolvaptan (TLV).

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study included 1670 patients who were admitted for ADHF and received intravenous furosemide within 1 h of presentation in clinical scenario 1 or 2 defined based on initial systolic blood pressure ≥100 mmHg with severe symptoms (New York Heart Association class III or IV (n = 830). The score for the poor DR factors in the very acute phase was calculated in patients treated with furosemide-only diuretics (n = 439). The DR to TLV administration was also assessed in patients who received an additional dose of TLV within 6 h (n = 391).

RESULTS

The time since discharge from the hospital for a previous heart failure < 3 months (odds ratio [OR] 2.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-5.83; p = 0.006), loop diuretics at admission (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.74-5.36; p < 0.0001), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR 2.99, 95% CI 1.58-5.74; p = 0.0007) were independent determinants of poor DR. The frequency of poor DR according to the risk stratification group was low risk (no risk factor), 18.9%; middle risk (one risk factor), 33.1%; and high risk (two to three risk factors), 58.0% (p < 0.0001). All risk groups demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of poor DR with early TLV administration: 10.7% in the early TLV group versus 18.9% in the loop diuretics group (p = 0.09) of the low-risk group; 18.4% versus 33.1% (p = 0.01) in the middle-risk group, and 20.2% versus 58.0% (p < 0.0001) in the high-risk group.

CONCLUSION

Early administration of TLV in patients with predicted poor DR contributed to a significant diuretic effect and suppression of worsening renal function.

Real-World Intravenous Diuretic Use to Treat Congestion in Patients With Heart Failure - An Observational Study Using a Research Database

Background: Intravenous (IV) diuretics are key in the treatment of acute heart failure, but the time of administration can affect outcomes. Using a medical database, we assessed the real-world usage and clinical impact of IV diuretics after admission. Methods and Results: This observational study included hospitalized patients with heart failure who received IV diuretics. Relationships between IV diuretic use and clinical outcomes (duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, readmission) were evaluated using analysis of variance or logistic regression. Overall, 9,653 patients (51.1% male) were assessed (mean age 80.9 years). Most (89.1%) patients had IV loop diuretic treatment initiated on Day 1 of hospitalization and 68.0% achieved the maximum dose on that day. The median duration of hospitalization was 17.0 days. In-hospital mortality was 9.2%; 13.7% of patients were readmitted within 3 months after discharge. There were prognostic relationships between IV diuretic usage and both duration of hospitalization and in-hospital mortality. On multivariable analysis, the time of maximum dose had the biggest impact on outcomes. Duration of hospitalization was prolonged and in-hospital mortality rates increased when the time of maximum dose was delayed. There was little correlation between IV diuretic use and readmission following discharge. Conclusions: Short-term outcomes (duration of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality) correlated with the time of maximum IV diuretic dose; thus, early initiation and subsequent modification of appropriate congestion treatment is critical for prognostic improvement.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous OPC-61815 compared with oral tolvaptan in patients with congestive heart failure

AIMS

This multicentre, randomized, controlled, double-blind, parallel-group Phase III study was conducted to confirm the non-inferiority of OPC-61815 (tolvaptan sodium phosphate) intravenous injections to oral tolvaptan tablets in patients with congestive heart failure and volume overload despite receiving diuretics other than vasopressin antagonists.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Congestive heart failure patients with volume overload despite receiving diuretics other than vasopressin antagonists were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive OPC-61815 (16-mg injection; n = 149) or oral tolvaptan (15-mg tablet; n = 145) once daily for 5 days. Most patients were male; the mean age and weight were 74.7 years and 62.1 kg, respectively; other demographic and clinical characteristics were similar between groups. In this study, the primary endpoint was the change in body weight from baseline to the day after the last dose. Secondary endpoints included improvement from baseline in congestive findings and New York Heart Association classification. The change in body weight was -1.67 kg [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.93, -1.41] and -1.36 kg (95% CI: -1.62, -1.10) in the OPC-61815 group and tolvaptan group, respectively; the difference in the least squares mean between the groups was -0.31 kg (95% CI: -0.68, 0.06). Given the upper CI did not exceed the pre-specified limit of 0.48, this confirmed the non-inferiority of injectable OPC-61815 to oral tolvaptan. Daily urine volume and daily fluid intake increased, and daily fluid balance was negative throughout the treatment period; changes were similar for both groups. All evaluated congestive symptoms and New York Heart Association classifications showed improvement and safety findings were similar between the groups. The incidence of hyperkalaemia was higher in the OPC-61815 group, and the incidence of thirst and dry mouth was higher in the tolvaptan group. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate; one serious treatment-emergent adverse event of hyperkalaemia in the OPC-61815 group was considered treatment related.

CONCLUSIONS

OPC-61815 (16-mg injection) was confirmed as non-inferior to oral tolvaptan (15-mg tablet) in patients with congestive heart failure and inadequate response to diuretics; no new safety concerns were observed.

Delays in Door-to-Diuretic Time and 1-Year Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

Achieving prompt euvolemic state in heart failure (HF) is associated with reduced mortality. Time-sensitive metrics such as door-to-diuretic time , or the time between presentation and administration of intravenous diuretics, may be an important facilitator of achieving a faster euvolemic state and reducing mortality.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate whether reduced door-to-diuretic time was associated with lower odds of death among hospitalized patients with HF.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients with HF admitted to a medical center was performed between 2020 and 2021. Inclusion criteria were an International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision code for HF with positive Framingham Criteria and the use of intravenous bolus furosemide. Exclusion criteria included ventricular assist devices, dialysis, and ultrafiltration therapy. Data collected from the medical records included demographics, echocardiography, staff notes, and medications. The end point was 1-year all-cause mortality. Descriptive statistics, t tests or median test, and multivariate logistic regression were used to describe the sample, evaluate group differences, and determine odds of mortality, respectively.

RESULTS

Among 160 charts from patients with HF (age, 70 ± 14.4 years; 52%, n = 83, male; 53%, n = 85, ischemic cardiomyopathy; 83%, n = 134, New York Heart Association classes III-IV), 30% (n = 48) died within 1 year. The median diuretic dose was 40 mg (interquartile range, 20 mg), with a median time of administration of 247 minutes (4.12 hours) (interquartile range, 294 minutes to 4.9 hours). After covariate adjustment, prolonged door-to-diuretic time more than doubled (2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.8; P = .04) the odds of 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of this sample of charts from older highly symptomatic patients with HF, delayed door-to-diuretic time was associated with significantly greater odds of 1-year all-cause mortality.

Evolving therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with new or worsening heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic, progressive, and increasingly prevalent syndrome characterized by stepwise declines in health status and residual lifespan. Despite significant advancements in both pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic management approaches for chronic HF, the burden of HF hospitalization-whether attributable to new-onset (de novo) HF or worsening of established HF-remains high and contributes to excess HF-related morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditures. Owing to a paucity of evidence to guide tailored interventions in this heterogeneous group, management of acute HF events remains largely subject to clinician discretion, relying principally on alleviation of clinical congestion, as-needed correction of hemodynamic perturbations, and concomitant reversal of underlying trigger(s). Following acute stabilization, the subsequent phase of care primarily involves interventions known to improve long-term outcomes and rehospitalization risk, including initiation and optimization of disease-modifying pharmacotherapy, targeted use of adjunctive therapies, and attention to contributing comorbid conditions. However, even with current standards of care many patients experience recurrent HF hospitalization, or after admission incur worsening clinical trajectories. These patterns highlight a persistent unmet need for evidence-based approaches to inform in-hospital HF care and call for renewed focus on urgent implementation of interventions capable of ameliorating risk of worsening HF. In this review, we discuss key contemporary and emerging therapeutic strategies for patients hospitalized with de novo or worsening HF.

Evidence Based Management of Acute Heart Failure in the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic

This editorial is to highlight current issues of heart failure management during COVID-19 pandemic.

The shock team: a multidisciplinary approach to early patient phenotyping and appropriate care escalation in cardiogenic shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a highly morbid condition with mortality remaining greater than 30% despite improved pathophysiologic understanding and access to mechanical circulatory support (MCS). In response, shock teams modeled on successful multidisciplinary care structures for other diseases are being implemented nationwide.

RECENT FINDINGS

Primary data supporting a benefit of shock team implementation on patient outcomes are relatively limited and entirely observational. Four single-center before-and-after studies and one multicenter registry study have demonstrated improved outcomes in patients with CS, potentially driven by increased pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) utilization and earlier (and more appropriate) initiation of MCS. Shock teams are also supported by a growing body of literature recognizing the independent benefit of the interventions they seek to implement, including patient phenotyping with PAC use and an algorithmic approach to CS care. Though debated, MCS is also highly likely to improve CS outcomes when applied appropriately, which further supports a multidisciplinary shock team approach to patient and device selection.

SUMMARY

Shock teams likely improve patient outcomes by facilitating early patient phenotyping and appropriate intervention. Institutions should strongly consider adopting a multidisciplinary shock team approach to CS care, though additional data supporting these interventions are needed.

Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock: Pathophysiology, Evaluation and Management Considerations: Review of Heart Failure-Related Cardiogenic Shock

Despite increasing prevalence in critical care units, cardiogenic shock related to HF (HF-CS) is incompletely understood and distinct from acute myocardial infarction related CS. This review highlights the pathophysiology, evaluation, and contemporary management of HF-CS.

The Diagnostic Value of Soluble ST2 in Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis

Objective: The diagnostic performance of soluble suppression of tumorigenicity (sST2) in heart failure (HF) had been investigated in multiple studies, but the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis evaluated the diagnostic value of sST2 in HF.

Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched until March 2021. Cohort studies or case-control studies relevant to the diagnostic value of sST2 in HF were screened, and true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and true negative (TN) data were extracted for calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC). The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS), the threshold effect was determined by calculating Spearman correlation coefficients and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve patterns, the heterogeneity was evaluated using the I² statistic and the Galbraith radial plot, and sensitivity analysis was also performed. Deeks' test was used to assess publication bias.

Results: A total of 11 studies from 10 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.114, p = 0.739, and the SROC curve did not show a “shoulder-arm” shape, which suggests that there was no threshold effect, but study heterogeneity existed because of non-threshold effects. The combined sensitivity was 0.72 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.65–0.78], specificity was 0.65 (95% CI: 0.45–0.81), PLR was 1.75 (95% CI: 1.33–2.31), NLR was 0.48 (95% CI: 0.37–0.63), DOR was 3.63 (95% CI: 2.29–5.74), and AUC was 0.75. The Deeks' test suggested no significant publication bias in the included studies (P = 0.94).

Conclusion: sST has some diagnostic value in HF, but this should be further evaluated in additional studies with rigorous design and high homogeneity.