Upgrades from a previous device compared to de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy in the European Society of Cardiology CRT Survey II

Long-term outcomes from upgrade to cardiac resynchronisation therapy in ischaemic versus non-ischaemic heart disease

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) can be necessary in patients with chronic heart failure, who have already been provided with transvenous cardiac implantable electrical devices. Upgrade procedures revealed controversial results, while long-term outcomes regarding underlying Ischaemic- (ICM) or Non-Ischaemic heart disease (NICM) have yet to be described.

METHODS

The Mannheim Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Registry (MARACANA) was designed as a retrospective observational single-centre registry, including all CRT implantations from 2013-2021 (n = 459). CRT upgrades (n = 136) were retrospectively grouped to either ICM (n = 84) or NICM (n = 52) and compared for New York Heart Association classification (NYHA), paced QRS-width, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and other heart failure modification aspects in the long-term (59.3 ± 5 months).

RESULTS

Baseline-characteristics including paced QRS-width, upgrade indications or NYHA-classification were comparable for both groups (group comparison p>.05). The CRT upgrade improved NYHA (ICM: 2.98 ± 0.4 to 2.29 ± 0.7, NICM: 2.94 ± 0.5 to 2.08 ± 0.5) and the LVEF (ICM: 27.2 ± 6.6 to 38.25 ± 8.8, NICM: 30.2 ± 9.4 to 38.7 ± 13.8%) after five years, irrespective of underlying heart disease (each group p < .05, group comparison p>.05). Only ICM revealed significant improvements in TAPSE (15.9 ± 4.1 to 18.9 ± 4.1 mm) and narrowing of the paced QRS-width (185.4 ± 29 to 147.2 ± 16.3 ms) after five years (each p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrade to CRT might improve heart failure symptoms and left-ventricular systolic function in the long-term, irrespective of underlying ischaemic or non-ischaemic heart disease.

Comparison of de novo implantation vs. upgrade cardiac resynchronisation therapy: a multicentre experience

BACKGROUND

The clinical safety and consequences of upgrade procedures compared with de novo cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) implantation in heart failure remain unclear. The present study aimed to assess clinical and procedural consequences of patients undergoing CRT upgrade as compared to de novo CRT implantations.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, two subgroups were considered as the study population as (1) de novo group that CRT was considered on optimised medical treatment with heart failure of NYHA functional class from II to IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35%, and QRS width of >130 ms and (2) upgrade group including the patients with previously implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) with the indications for upgrading to CRT. The two groups were compared regarding the changes in clinical outcome and echocardiography parameters.

RESULTS

The procedure was successful in 95.9% of patients who underwent CRT upgrade and 100% of those who underwent de novo CRT implantation. It showed a significant improvement in LVEF, severity of mitral regurgitation and NYHA functional classification, without any difference between the two study groups. Overall procedural related complications were reported in 10.8% and 3.8% (p = .093) and cardiac death in 5.4% and 2.5% (p = .360), respectively, with no overall difference in postoperative outcome between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Upgrading to CRT is a safe and effective procedure regarding improvement of functional class, left ventricular function status and post-procedural outcome.

[History of cardiac resynchronization therapy : 30 years of electrotherapeutic management for heart failure]

The first permanent biventricular pacing system was implanted more than 30 years ago. In this article, the historical development of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), starting with the pathophysiological concept, followed by the initial "proof of concept" studies and finally the large prospective-randomized studies that led to the implementation of CRT in heart failure guidelines, is outlined. Since the establishment of CRT, both an expansion of indications, e.g., for patients with mild heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but also the return to patients with broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block who benefit most of CRT has evolved. New techniques such as conduction system pacing will have major influence on pacemaker therapy in heart failure, both as an alternative or adjunct to CRT.

Electrical therapies in heart failure: Evolving technologies and indications

Device therapy for heart failure has rapidly evolved over 2 decades. The knowledge of indications, assessment lead and device technology has expanded to include CRT, leadless pacing and conduction system pacing such as His bundle and left bundle branch area pacing. But there is still a lack of evidence for these new technologies as well as for common indications such as atrial fibrillation and upgrading from a previous device. The role of personalized medicine will become increasingly important when selecting candidates for CRT, primary preventive ICD ablation procedures and emerging new devices such as cardiac contractility modulation (CCM). Rapidity of therapy is associated with outcome which will be a challenge. If properly implemented devices and drugs will have a large positive affect of HF outcomes.

Phenogrouping and risk stratification of patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade using topological data analysis

Choosing the optimal device during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade can be challenging. Therefore, we sought to provide a solution for identifying patients in whom upgrading to a CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) is associated with better long-term survival than upgrading to a CRT-pacemaker (CRT-P). To this end, we first applied topological data analysis to create a patient similarity network using 16 clinical features of 326 patients without prior ventricular arrhythmias who underwent CRT upgrade. Then, in the generated circular network, we delineated three phenogroups exhibiting significant differences in clinical characteristics and risk of all-cause mortality. Importantly, only in the high-risk phenogroup was upgrading to a CRT-D associated with better survival than upgrading to a CRT-P (hazard ratio: 0.454 (0.228-0.907), p = 0.025). Finally, we assigned each patient to one of the three phenogroups based on their location in the network and used this labeled data to train multi-class classifiers to enable the risk stratification of new patients. During internal validation, an ensemble of 5 multi-layer perceptrons exhibited the best performance with a balanced accuracy of 0.898 (0.854-0.942) and a micro-averaged area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.983 (0.980-0.986). To allow further validation, we made the proposed model publicly available ( https://github.com/tokmarton/crt-upgrade-risk-stratification ).

Upgrade of right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

De novo implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) reduces the risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with left bundle branch block, heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, among HFrEF patients with right ventricular pacing (RVP), the efficacy of CRT-D upgrade is uncertain.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial, 360 symptomatic (New York Heart Association Classes II-IVa) HFrEF patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), high RVP burden ≥ 20%, and a wide paced QRS complex duration ≥ 150 ms were randomly assigned to receive CRT-D upgrade (n = 215) or ICD (n = 145) in a 3:2 ratio. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or <15% reduction of left ventricular end-systolic volume assessed at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 12.4 months, the primary outcome occurred in 58/179 (32.4%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 101/128 (78.9%) in the ICD arm (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.06-0.19; P < .001). All-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization occurred in 22/215 (10%) in the CRT-D arm vs. 46/145 (32%) in the ICD arm (hazard ratio 0.27; 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.47; P < .001). The incidence of procedure- or device-related complications was similar between the two arms [CRT-D group 25/211 (12.3%) vs. ICD group 11/142 (7.8%)].

CONCLUSIONS

In pacemaker or ICD patients with significant RVP burden and reduced ejection fraction, upgrade to CRT-D compared with ICD therapy reduced the combined risk of all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, or absence of reverse remodelling.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a prior history of atrial fibrillation: Insights from four major clinical trials

AIMS

To investigate the association of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on outcomes among participants with and without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

Individual-patient-data from four randomized trials investigating CRT-Defibrillators (COMPANION, MADIT-CRT, REVERSE) or CRT-Pacemakers (COMPANION, MIRACLE) were analyzed. Outcomes were time to a composite of heart failure hospitalization or all-cause mortality or to all-cause mortality alone. The association of CRT on outcomes for patients with and without a history of AF was assessed using a Bayesian-Weibull survival regression model adjusting for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Of 3964 patients included, 586 (14.8%) had a history of AF; 2245 (66%) were randomized to CRT. Overall, CRT reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69, 95% credible interval [CI]: 0.56-0.81). The effect was similar (posterior probability of no interaction = 0.26) in patients with (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.55-1.10) and without a history of AF (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.55-0.80). In these four trials, CRT did not reduce mortality overall (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.66-1.01) without evidence of interaction (posterior probability of no interaction = 0.14) for patients with (HR: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.70-1.74) or without a history of AF (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.60-0.97).

CONCLUSION

The association of CRT on the composite endpoint or mortality was not statistically different for patients with or without a history of AF, but this could reflect inadequate power. Our results call for trials to confirm the benefit of CRT recipients with a history of AF.

Special Issue: Latest Advances in Delivery and Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) is an established technique to improve morbidity and mortality in selected heart failure patients [...].

Efficacy of CRT upgrade in pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy in an outpatient clinic - Results of a prospective registry

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective, monocentric registry study was to investigate whether upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) can improve left ventricular function in typical outpatient clinical patients.

METHODS

We screened for PICM in a pacemaker outpatient clinic between 2017 and 2021. The follow-up period was 6 months. The primary endpoint was decreased left ventricular end systolic volume (LVESV), and the responder criterion was decreased LVESV >15%. Secondary endpoints were LVEF, NYHA class, device-associated complications and death.

RESULTS

66 patients were newly diagnosed with PICM. 55 of them received a CRT upgrade. For the primary endpoint, LVESV decreased from 101.6 ± 48.2 ml to 75.9 ± 35.8 ml (p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints were: a) LVEF increased from 31.5 ± 5.4% to 46.1 ± 7.6% (p < 0.001) and b) NYHA class improved by an average of one class in both groups (p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 1.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT upgrade in outpatient clinic patients with PICM improves left ventricular function and functional capacity and is associated with an acceptable complication rate.

Upgrading right ventricular pacemakers to biventricular pacing or conduction system pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Guidelines recommend patients undergoing a first pacemaker implant who have even mild left ventricular (LV) impairment should receive biventricular or conduction system pacing (CSP). There is no corresponding recommendation for patients who already have a pacemaker. We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies assessing device upgrades. The primary outcome was the echocardiographic change in LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Six RCTs (randomizing 161 patients) and 47 observational studies (2644 patients) assessing the efficacy of upgrade to biventricular pacing were eligible for analysis. Eight observational studies recruiting 217 patients of CSP upgrade were also eligible. Fourteen additional studies contributed data on complications (25 412 patients). Randomized controlled trials of biventricular pacing upgrade showed LVEF improvement of +8.4% from 35.5% and observational studies: +8.4% from 25.7%. Observational studies of left bundle branch area pacing upgrade showed +11.1% improvement from 39.0% and observational studies of His bundle pacing upgrade showed +12.7% improvement from 36.0%. New York Heart Association class decreased by -0.4, -0.8, -1.0, and -1.2, respectively. Randomized controlled trials of biventricular upgrade found improvement in Minnesota Heart Failure Score (-6.9 points) and peak oxygen uptake (+1.1 mL/kg/min). This was also seen in observational studies of biventricular upgrades (-19.67 points and +2.63 mL/kg/min, respectively). In studies of the biventricular upgrade, complication rates averaged 2% for pneumothorax, 1.4% for tamponade, and 3.7% for infection over 24 months of mean follow-up. Lead-related complications occurred in 3.3% of biventricular upgrades and 1.8% of CSP upgrades. Randomized controlled trials show significant physiological and symptomatic benefits of upgrading pacemakers to biventricular pacing. Observational studies show similar effects between biventricular pacing upgrade and CSP upgrade.

Clinical implications and risk factors for QRS prolongation over time in heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

QRS prolongation is an established prognostic marker in heart failure (HF). In contrast, the role of QRS width progression over time has been incompletely explored. The current study investigates the role of QRS width progression over time on clinical status and identifies underlying predictors.

METHODS

Datasets of ≥ 2 consecutive visits from 100 attendees to our HF clinic between April and August 2021 were analysed for changes in QRS complex duration.

RESULTS

In total 240 datasets were stratified into tertiles based on change in QRS duration (mm/month) (1st tertile: - 1.65 [1.50] 'regression'; 2nd tertile 0.03 [0.19] 'stable', 3rd tertile 3.57 [10.11] 'progression'). The incidence of the combined endpoint HF hospitalisation and worsening of symptomatic heart failure was significantly higher in the group with QRS width progression (3rd tertile) compared with the stable group (2nd tertile; log-rank test: p = 0.013). These patients were characterised by higher plasma NT-pro-BNP levels (p = 0.008) and higher heart rate (p = 0.007). A spline-based prediction model identified patients at risk of QRS width progression when NT-pro-BNP and heartrate were > 837 pg/ml and > 83/bpm, respectively. These markers were independent of guideline-directed medical HF therapy. Patients beyond both thresholds had a 14-fold increased risk of QRS width progression compared to those with neither or either alone (HR: 14.2 [95% 6.9 - 53.6]; p < 0.0001, p for interaction = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study demonstrates that QRS width progression is associated with clinical deterioration of HF. NTproBNP plasma levels and heart rate indicate patients at risk QRS width progression, independently of HF therapy.

The Effects of His Bundle Pacing Compared to Classic Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) is among the most common right ventricular pacing complications. Upgrading to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is the recommended treatment option. Conduction system pacing with His bundle pacing (HBP) has the potential to restore synchronous ventricular activation and can be an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP). Patients with PICM scheduled for a system upgrade to CRT were included in the prospective cohort study. Either HBP or BVP was used for CRT. Electrocardiographic, clinical, and echocardiographic measurements were recorded at baseline and six-month follow-up. HBP was successful in 44 of 53 patients (83%). Thirty-nine patients with HBP and 22 with BVP completed a 6-month follow-up. HBP led to a higher reduction in QRS duration than BVP, 118.3 ± 14.20 ms vs. 150.5 ± 18.64 ms, p < 0.0001. The improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class by one or two was more common in patients with HBP than those with BiV (p = 0.04). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved in BVP patients from 32.9 ± 7.93% to 43.9 ± 8.07%, p < 0.0001, and in HBP patients from 34.9 ± 6.45% to 48.6 ± 7.73%, p < 0.0001. The improvement in LVEF was more considerable in HBP patients than in BVP patients, p = 0.019. The improvement in clinical outcomes and left ventricle reverse remodeling was more significant with HBP than BVP. HBP can be a valid alternative to BVP for upgrade procedures in PICM patients.

Baseline clinical characteristics of heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction enrolled in the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade trial

AIMS

The BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade study is the first prospective, randomized, multicentre clinical trial investigating the outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrade in heart failure (HF) patients with intermittent or permanent right ventricular (RV) pacing with wide paced QRS. This report describes the baseline clinical characteristics of the enrolled patients and compares them to cohorts from previous milestone CRT studies.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This international multicentre randomized controlled trial investigates 360 patients having a pacemaker (PM) or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) device for at least 6 months prior to enrolment, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤35%), HF symptoms (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II-IVa), wide paced QRS (>150 ms), and ≥20% of RV pacing burden without having a native left bundle branch block. At enrolment, the mean age of the patients was 73 ± 8 years; 89% were male, 97% were in NYHA class II/III functional class, and 56% had atrial fibrillation. Enrolled patients predominantly had conventional PM devices, with a mean RV pacing burden of 86%. Thus, this is a patient cohort with advanced HF, low baseline LVEF (25 ± 7%), high N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels (2231 pg/ml [25th-75th percentile 1254-4309 pg/ml]), and frequent HF hospitalizations during the preceding 12 months (50%).

CONCLUSION

When compared with prior CRT trial cohorts, the BUDAPEST-CRT Upgrade study includes older patients with a strong male predominance and a high burden of atrial fibrillation and other comorbidities. Moreover, this cohort represents an advanced HF population with low LVEF, high NT-proBNP, and frequent previous HF events.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02270840.

CRT „reloaded“ 2022 – die neuen Guidelines und technische Innovationen

Die kardiale Resynchronisationstherapie (cardiac resynchronization therapy, CRT) stellt für Patienten mit symptomatischer Herzinsuffizienz und Linksschenkelblock eine etablierte und erfolgreiche Therapieoption dar, wenn die konservative medikamentöse Therapie ausgeschöpft ist und alle anderen kausalen Ursachen wie Ischämie, Klappenfehler und Rhythmusstörungen behandelt worden sind. Die aktuellen Pacing-Guidelines der ESC betonen erneut den Stellenwert der CRT als primäre interventionelle Herzinsuffizienztherapie, besonders bei Sinusrhythmus, einer LVEF ≤ 35% und typischem Linksschenkelblock ≥ 150 ms. Bei gleichzeitig bestehendem unkontrollierbarem Vorhofflimmern gewinnt die AV-Knoten-Ablation an Bedeutung. Für den nicht zu vernachlässigenden Anteil von Herzinsuffizienzpatienten ohne klare CRT-Indikation oder mit unzureichender CRT-Response kann eine multimodale Bildgebung zusätzliche Informationen liefern. Alternative Pacingmethoden sollten bei anatomischen Hindernissen erwogen werden. Die Wahl eines zusätzlichen Defibrillators ist auch nach der aktuellen Studienlage häufig schwierig und bleibt individuell abzuwägen.

The relation between cardiac 123I-mIBG scintigraphy and functional response 1 year after CRT implantation

Aims 

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a disease-modifying therapy in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Current guidelines ascribe CRT eligibility on three parameters only: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), QRS duration, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. However, one-third of CHF patients does not benefit from CRT. This study evaluated whether ¹²³I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (¹²³I-mIBG) assessed cardiac sympathetic activity could optimize CRT patient selection.

Methods and results 

A total of 78 stable CHF subjects (age 66.8 ± 9.6 years, 73% male, LVEF 25.2 ± 6.7%, QRS duration 153 ± 23 ms, NYHA 2.2 ± 0.7) referred for CRT implantation were enrolled. Subjects underwent ¹²³I-mIBG scintigraphy prior to implantation. Early and late heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) ratio and ¹²³I-mIBG washout were calculated. CRT response was defined as either an increase of LVEF to >35%, any improvement in LVEF of >10%, QRS shortening to <150 ms, or improvement in NYHA class of >1 class. In 33 patients LVEF increased to >35%, QRS decreased <150 ms in 36 patients, and NYHA class decreased in 33 patients. Late H/M ratio and hypertension were independent predictors of LVEF improvement to >35% (P = 0.0014 and P = 0.0149, respectively). In addition, early H/M ratio, LVEF, and absence of diabetes mellitus (DM) were independent predictors for LVEF improvement by >10%. No independent predictors were found for QRS shortening to <150 ms or improvement in NYHA class.

Conclusion 

Early and late H/M ratio were independent predictors of CRT response when improvement of LVEF was used as measure of response. Therefore, cardiac ¹²³I-mIBG scintigraphy may be used as a tool to optimize selection of subjects that might benefit from CRT.

Long-term survival following upgrade compared with de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: a single-centre, high-volume experience

AIMS

Patients with a pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator are often considered for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). However, limited comprehensive data are available regarding their long-term outcomes.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Our retrospective registry included 2524 patients [1977 (78%) de novo, 547 (22%) upgrade patients] with mild to severe symptoms, left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, and QRS ≥ 130ms. The primary outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality, heart transplantation (HTX), or left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation; secondary endpoints were death from any cause and post-procedural complications. In our cohort, upgrade patients were older [71 (65-77) vs. 67 (59-73) years; P < 0.001], were less frequently females (20% vs. 27%; P = 0.002) and had more comorbidities than de novo patients. During the median follow-up time of 3.7 years, 1091 (55%) de novo and 342 (63%) upgrade patients reached the primary endpoint. In univariable analysis, upgrade patients exhibited a higher risk of mortality/HTX/LVAD than the de novo group [hazard ratio (HR): 1.41; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001]. However, this difference disappeared after adjusting for covariates (adjusted HR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86-1.48; P = 0.402), or propensity score matching (propensity score-matched HR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.95-1.29; P = 0.215). From device-related complications, lead dysfunction (3.1% vs. 1%; P < 0.001) and pocket infections (3.7% vs. 1.8%; P = 0.014) were more frequent in the upgrade group compared to de novo patients.

CONCLUSION

In our retrospective analysis, upgrade patients had a higher risk of all-cause mortality than de novo patients, which might be attributable to their more significant comorbidity burden. The occurrence of lead dysfunction and pocket infections was more frequent in the upgrade group.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillation: a long-standing debate

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) was shown to improve cardiac function, reduce heart failure hospitalizations, improve quality of life and prolong survival in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction and intraventricular conduction disturbances, mainly left bundle branch block, on optimal medical therapy with ACE-inhibitors, β-blockers and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists up-titrated to maximum tolerated evidence-based doses. CRT can be achieved by means of pacemaker systems (CRT-P) or devices with defibrillation capabilities (CRT-D). CRT-Ds offer an undoubted advantage in the prevention of arrhythmic death, but such an advantage may be of lesser degree in non-ischemic heart failure aetiologies. Moreover, the higher CRT-D hardware complexity compared to CRT-P may predispose to device/lead malfunctions and the higher current drainage may cause a shorter battery duration with consequent premature replacements and the well-known incremental complications. In a period of financial constraints, also device costs should be carefully evaluated, with recent reports suggesting that CRT-Ps may be favoured over CRT-Ds in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and no prior history of cardiac arrhythmias from a cost-effectiveness point of view. The choice between a CRT-P or a CRT-D device should be patient-tailored whenever straightforward defibrillator indications are not present. The Goldenberg score may facilitate this decision-making process in ambiguous settings. Age, comorbidities, kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, advanced functional class, inappropriate therapy risk, implantable device infections and malfunctions are factors potentially reducing the expected benefit from defibrillating capabilities. Future prospective, randomized controlled trials are warranted to directly compare the efficacy and safety of CRT-Ps and CRT-Ds.

Central Sleep Apnea and Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy

The role of central sleep apnea (CSA) in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) remains speculative. In a prospective trial entitled UPGRADE, the presence of CSA was assessed by single-night polysomnography (PSG) in 54 PICM patients within 1 month after left ventricular lead implantation (with biventricular stimulation still not activated). CSA was diagnosed in half of patients (n = 27). Patients with moderate or severe CSA were randomized to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) versus right ventricular pacing (RVP) in a double-blinded cross-over design and re-scheduled for a follow-up PSG within 3 to 5 months. After crossing-over of stimulation mode another PSG was conducted 3 to 5 months later. CRT led to a significant increase in left ventricular ejection fraction and significant reduction in left ventricular end systolic volumes and N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide plasma levels, whereas no significant effects were observed with ongoing RVP. CSA was significantly improved after 3.9 (3.2 to 4.4) months of CRT: apnea-hypopnea index decreased from 39.1 (32.1 to 54.0) events per hour at baseline to 22.2/h (10.9 to 36.7) by CRT (p <0.001). Central apnea index decreased from 27.1/h (17.7 to 36.1) at baseline to 6.8/h (1.1 to 14.4) after CRT activation (p <0.001). Ongoing RVP yielded only a minor improvement in apnea-hypopnea index and central apnea index. Pre-existent CSA did not affect structural response rate and had no impact on mid-term follow-up (median 2.8 years). In conclusion, CSA is highly prevalent in patients with PICM. CRT upgrading significantly improves CSA leading to a similar outcome in PICM patients without pre-existent CSA.

Heart failure in the last year: progress and perspective

Research about heart failure (HF) has made major progress in the last years. We give here an update on the most recent findings. Landmark trials have established new treatments for HF with reduced ejection fraction. Sacubitril/valsartan was superior to enalapril in PARADIGM-HF trial, and its initiation during hospitalization for acute HF or early after discharge can now be considered. More recently, new therapeutic pathways have been developed. In the DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials, dapagliflozin and empagliflozin reduced the risk of the primary composite endpoint, compared with placebo [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.85; P < 0.001 and HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65-0.86; P < 0.001, respectively]. Second, vericiguat, an oral soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization vs. placebo (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.82-0.98; P = 0.02). On the other hand, both the diagnosis and treatment of HF with preserved ejection fraction, as well as management of advanced HF and acute HF, remain challenging. A better phenotyping of patients with HF would be helpful for prognostic stratification and treatment selection. Further aspects, such as the use of devices, treatment of arrhythmias, and percutaneous treatment of valvular heart disease in patients with HF, are also discussed and reviewed in this article.

Comparative Analysis of Procedural Outcomes and Complications Between De Novo and Upgraded Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

OBJECTIVES

This study compared rates of procedural success and complications between de novo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation versus upgrade, including characterization of technical challenges.

BACKGROUND

CRT upgrade is common, but data are limited on the incidence of procedural success and complications as compared to de novo implantation.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a transvenous CRT procedure at a single institution between 2013 and 2018 were reviewed for procedure outcome, 90-day complications, reasons for unsuccessful left ventricular lead delivery, and the presence of venous occlusive disease (VOD) that required a modified implantation technique.

RESULTS

Among 1,496 patients, 947 (63%) underwent de novo implantation and 549 (37%) underwent device upgrade. Patients who received a device upgrade were older (70 ± 12 years vs. 68 ± 13 years; p < 0.01), with a male predominance (75% vs. 66%; p < 0.01) and greater prevalence of comorbidities. There was no difference in the rate of procedural success between de novo and upgrade CRT procedures (97% vs. 96%; p = 0.28) or 90-day complications (5.1% vs. 4.6%; p = 0.70). VOD was present in 23% of patients who received a device upgrade and was more common among patients with a dual-chamber versus a single-chamber device (26% vs. 9%; p < 0.001). Patients with and without VOD had a similar composite outcome of procedural failure or complication (8.0% vs. 7.8%; p = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of procedural success and complications were no different between de novo CRT implantations and upgrades. VOD frequently increased procedural complexity in upgrades, but alternative management strategies resulted in similar outcomes. Routine venography before CRT upgrade may aid in procedural planning and execution of these strategies.

Highlights in heart failure

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of mortality, morbidity, and poor quality of life. It is an area of active research. This article is aimed to give an update on recent advances in all aspects of this syndrome. Major changes occurred in drug treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Sacubitril/valsartan is indicated as a substitute to ACEi/ARBs after PARADIGM-HF (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.73 to 0.87 for sacubitril/valsartan vs. enalapril for the primary endpoint and Wei, Lin and Weissfeld HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89 for recurrent events). Its initiation was then shown as safe and potentially useful in recent studies in patients hospitalized for acute HF. More recently, dapagliflozin and prevention of adverse-outcomes in DAPA-HF trial showed the beneficial effects of the sodium-glucose transporter type 2 inhibitor dapaglifozin vs. placebo, added to optimal standard therapy [HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85;0.74; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.85 for the primary endpoint]. Trials with other SGLT 2 inhibitors and in other patients, such as those with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or with recent decompensation, are ongoing. Multiple studies showed the unfavourable prognostic significance of abnormalities in serum potassium levels. Potassium lowering agents may allow initiation and titration of mineralocorticoid antagonists in a larger proportion of patients. Meta-analyses suggest better outcomes with ferric carboxymaltose in patients with iron deficiency. Drugs effective in HFrEF may be useful also in HF with mid-range ejection fraction. Better diagnosis and phenotype characterization seem warranted in HF with preserved ejection fraction. These and other burning aspects of HF research are summarized and reviewed in this article.

EHRA White Paper: knowledge gaps in arrhythmia management—status 2019

Clinicians accept that there are many unknowns when we make diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Acceptance of uncertainty is essential for the pursuit of the profession: bedside decisions must often be made on the basis of incomplete evidence. Over the years, physicians sometimes even do not realize anymore which the fundamental gaps in our knowledge are. As clinical scientists, however, we have to halt and consider what we do not know yet, and how we can move forward addressing those unknowns. The European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) believes that scanning the field of arrhythmia / cardiac electrophysiology to identify knowledge gaps which are not yet the subject of organized research, should be undertaken on a regular basis. Such a review (White Paper) should concentrate on research which is feasible, realistic, and clinically relevant, and should not deal with futuristic aspirations. It fits with the EHRA mission that these White Papers should be shared on a global basis in order to foster collaborative and needed research which will ultimately lead to better care for our patients. The present EHRA White Paper summarizes knowledge gaps in the management of atrial fibrillation, ventricular tachycardia/sudden death and heart failure.

Clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy

AIMS

We investigated the clinical features, predictors, and long-term prognosis of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM).

METHODS AND RESULTS

From a retrospective analysis of 1418 consecutive pacemaker patients, 618 were found to have a preserved baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), follow-up echocardiographic data, and no history of heart failure (HF). PiCM was defined as a reduction in LVEF (< 50%) along with either (i) a ≥ 10% decrease in LVEF, or (ii) new-onset regional wall motion abnormality unrelated to coronary artery disease. PiCM occurred in 87 of 618 patients (14.1%), with a decrease in mean LVEF from 60.5% to 40.1%. The median time to PiCM was 4.7 years. Baseline left bundle branch block, wider paced QRS duration (≥ 155 ms), and higher ventricular pacing percentage (≥ 86%) were identified as independent predictors of PiCM in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The risk of PiCM increased gradually with the number of identified predictors, becoming more significant in the presence of two or more predictors (P < 0.001). During the entire follow-up (median 7.2 years), the risk of all-cause death or HF admission was significantly higher in patients with PiCM compared to those without PiCM (38.3% vs. 54.0%, adjusted hazard ratio 2.93; 95% confidence interval 1.82-4.72; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy patients showed a worse long-term prognosis than those without PiCM. Therefore, patients with multiple risk factors of PiCM should be monitored carefully even if their left ventricular systolic function is preserved initially. A timely upgrade to a biventricular or His-bundle pacing device needs to be considered in patients with PiCM.

The Past, Present and Future of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has revolutionized the care of the patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and electrical dyssynchrony. The current guidelines for patient selection include measurement of left ventricular systolic function, QRS duration and morphology, and functional classification. Despite consistent and increasing evidence supporting CRT use in appropriate patients, CRT has been underutilized. Notwithstanding the heterogeneous definitions of non-response, more than one-third of patients demonstrate a lack of echocardiographic reverse remodeling or poor clinical outcome following CRT. Since the causes of this non-response are multifactorial, it will require multidisciplinary efforts to overcome including optimal patient selection, procedural strategies, as well as optimizing post-implant care in patients undergoing CRT. The innovations of novel pacing approaches combined with advanced imaging technologies may eventually offer a personalized CRT system uniquely tailored to each patient's dyssynchrony signature.

[Leadless endocardial ultrasound based left ventricular stimulation : WISE CRT System: alternative to conventional methods]

There are still several limitations in delivering cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT). After 6 months, 20-40% of patients fail to have clinical benefit due to various reasons. Endocardial stimulation rather than conventional epicardial pacing has been shown to be more physiological, improves electrical stimulation of the left ventricle (LV), has less dispersion of electrical activity and results in better resynchronisation. The WiSE™ CRT System ("Wireless stimulation endocardial system"; EBR Systems, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) provides an option for wireless, LV endocardial pacing triggered by a conventional right ventricular pacing spike from a co-implant. The feasibility of the WiSE™ CRT System has been successfully demonstrated in a population of failed cardiac resynchronisation patients with either failed implantation of a conventional system, nonresponse to conventional therapy or upgrade from pacemaker or defibrillator, where a conventional system was not an option. The WiSE™ CRT System is an innovative technology with promising safety, performance and preliminary efficacy.

Complications associated with cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrades versus de novo implantations

INTRODUCTION

A significant number of patients undergo upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). These patients tend to differ from individuals undergoing de novo CRT implantations both in terms of their baseline demographics and the etiology underlying their heart failure. Areas covered: There are several factors that need to be considered when upgrading patients to CRT, such as, venous patency. Potentially, these conditions can cause issues which may result in procedures being more difficult than de novo implantations. This article discusses these issues and compares the rates of procedural-related complications for CRT upgrades and de novo implantations. It discusses the proportion of patients that are likely to respond to CRT with each intervention. Expert commentary: Understanding the relative risks of CRT upgrades versus de novo implantations is important to help operators select the correct initial device and counsel patients accordingly. Growing experience with image-guided implantations and endocardial pacing may prove to be particularly relevant to patients undergoing CRT upgrades.