Contribution of ventricular assist devices to the recovery of failing hearts: a review and the Berlin Heart Center Experience

Trans-aortic Valvular Ejection Fraction for Monitoring Recovery of Patients with Ventricular Systolic Heart Failure

Durable mechanical circulatory support in the form of left ventricular (LV) assist device (LVAD) therapy is increasingly considered in the context of the recovery of native cardiac function. Progressive improvement in LV function may facilitate LVAD explantation and a resultant reduction in device-related risk. However, ascertaining LV recovery remains a challenge. In this study, we investigated the use of trans-aortic valvular flow rate and trans-LVAD flow rate to assess native LV systolic function using a well-established lumped parameter model of the mechanically assisted LV with pre-existing systolic dysfunction. Trans-aortic valvular ejection fraction (TAVEF) was specifically found to characterize the preload-independent contractility of the LV. It demonstrated excellent sensitivity to simulated pharmacodynamic stress tests and volume infusion tests. TAVEF may prove to be useful in the ascertainment of LV recovery in LVAD-supported LVs with pre-existing LV systolic dysfunction.

Cardiological Challenges Related to Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Long-term mechanical circulatory support by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), with or without an additional temporary or long-term right ventricular (RV) support, is a life-saving therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) refractory to pharmacological treatment, as well as for both device and surgical optimization therapies. In patients with chronic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), timely prediction of HF's transition into its end stage, necessitating life-saving heart transplantation or long-term VAD support (as a bridge-to-transplantation or destination therapy), remains particularly challenging, given the wide range of possible etiologies, pathophysiological features, and clinical presentations of NICM. Decision-making between the necessity of an LVAD or a biventricular assist device (BVAD) is crucial because both unnecessary use of a BVAD and irreversible right ventricular (RV) failure after LVAD implantation can seriously impair patient outcomes. The pre-operative or, at the latest, intraoperative prediction of RV function after LVAD implantation is reliably possible, but necessitates integrative evaluations of many different echocardiographic, hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. VADs create favorable conditions for the reversal of structural and functional cardiac alterations not only in acute forms of HF, but also in chronic HF. Although full cardiac recovery is rather unusual in VAD recipients with pre-implant chronic HF, the search for myocardial reverse remodelling and functional improvement is worthwhile because, for sufficiently recovered patients, weaning from VADs has proved to be feasible and capable of providing survival benefits and better quality of life even if recovery remains incomplete. This review article aimed to provide an updated theoretical and practical background for those engaged in this highly demanding and still current topic due to the continuous technical progress in the optimization of long-term VADs, as well as due to the new challenges which have emerged in conjunction with the proof of a possible myocardial recovery during long-term ventricular support up to levels which allow successful device explantation.

LVAD therapy as a catalyst to heart failure remission and myocardial recovery

The management of chronic heart failure over the past decade has witnessed tremendous strides in medical optimization and device therapy including the use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD). What we once thought of as irreversible damage to the myocardium is now demonstrating signs of reverse remodeling and recovery. Myocardial recovery on the structural, molecular, and hemodynamic level is necessary for sufficient recovery to withstand explant and achieve sustained recovery post-LVAD. Guideline-directed medical therapy and unloading have been shown to aid in recovery with the potential to successfully explant the LVAD. This review will summarize medical optimization, assessment for recovery, explant methodologies and outcomes post-recovery with explant of durable LVAD.

Myocardial recovery following left ventricular assist device implantation

Durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have consistently shown improved mortality and morbidity in patients with end-stage heart failure. Select patients with LVADs may experience significant enough myocardial recovery after device implantation to allow for explantation or decommissioning. While earlier trials suggested a high incidence of recovery, real-world clinical data have demonstrated this to be a much rarer phenomenon. Whether or not patients experience recovery, practices such as speed optimization and usage of guideline-directed medical therapy can improve patient outcomes.

Clinical myocardial recovery in advanced heart failure with long term left ventricular assist device support

Left ventricular assist-device (LVAD) implantation is a life-saving therapy for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). With chronic unloading and circulatory support, LVAD-supported hearts often show significant reverse remodeling at the structural, cellular and molecular level. However, translation of these changes into meaningful cardiac recovery allowing LVAD explant is lagging. Part of the reason for this discrepancy is lack of anticipation and hence promotion and evaluation for recovery post LVAD implant. There is additional uncertainty about the long-term course of HF following LVAD explant. In selected patients, however, guided by the etiology of HF, duration of disease and other clinical factors, significant functional improvement and LVAD explantation with long-term freedom from recurrent HF events has been demonstrated to be feasible in a reproducible manner. The identified predictors of myocardial recovery suggest that the elective therapeutic use of potentially less invasive VADs for reversal of HF earlier in the disease process is a future goal that warrants further investigation. Hence, it is prudent to develop and implement tools to predict HF reversibility prior to LVAD implant, optimize unloading-promoted recovery with guideline directed medical therapy and monitor for myocardial improvement. This review article summarizes the clinical aspects of myocardial recovery and together with its companion review article focused on the biological aspects of recovery, they aim to provide a useful framework for clinicians and investigators.

LVAD as a Bridge to Remission from Advanced Heart Failure: Current Data and Opportunities for Improvement

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are an established treatment modality for advanced heart failure (HF). It has been shown that through volume and pressure unloading they can lead to significant functional and structural cardiac improvement, allowing LVAD support withdrawal in a subset of patients. In the first part of this review, we discuss the historical background, current evidence on the incidence and assessment of LVAD-mediated cardiac recovery, and out-comes including quality of life after LVAD support withdrawal. In the second part, we discuss current and future opportunities to promote LVAD-mediated reverse remodeling and improve our pathophysiological understanding of HF and recovery for the benefit of the greater HF population.

Myocardial recovery evaluation from ventricular assist device in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy

AIMS

The removal of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) after myocardial recovery can provide survival benefits with freedom from LVAD-associated complications. However, in the absence of standardization, the weaning evaluation and surgical strategy differ widely among centres. Therefore, we analysed the experiences of LVAD explantation with our protocol in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients and investigated the validity of our weaning evaluation and surgical strategy from the perspective of optimal long-term survival.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All LVAD explantation patients in our institution between May 2012 and May 2020 were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by our three-phase weaning assessment: (i) clinical stability with improved cardiac function under LVAD support; (ii) haemodynamic stability shown by ramp-loading and saline-loading test; (iii) intraoperative pump-off test. Explant surgery involved removal of the whole system including driveline, pump, sewing ring and outflow-graft, and closure of an apical hole. Intra-operative, peri-operative, and post-operative outcomes, including all-cause mortality and LVAD associated major complications, were retrospectively analysed. A total of 12 DCM patients (DuraHeart, n = 2; EVAHEART, n = 2; HeartMate II, n = 6; HeartMate 3, n = 2) had myocardial recovery after a median 10 months [interquartile range (IQR); 6.3-15 months] support and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 37 y, IQR; 34-41 years; 83% men]. The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 20% (IQR; 12-23%) at LVAD-implantation and 54% (IQR: 45-55%) before LVAD explantation (P < 0.001). There were no perioperative complications and median ICU stay was 4 days (IQR; 2-4 days). All patients were discharged after a median of 24 days (IQR: 17-28 days) postoperatively. No patient suffered from any cardiac event (heart failure hospitalization, re-implantation of LVAD, or heart transplantation) at a median of 40 months (IQR: 17-58 months) follow up. All patients are alive with NYHA functional class 1 with preserved left ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluation of LVAD explant candidates by our weaning protocol was safe and effective. In the patients completing our protocol successfully, LVAD explantation is feasible and an excellent long-term cardiac event free-survival seems to be achieved.

Cardiac recovery following left ventricular assist device therapy: experience of complete device explantation including ventricular patch plasty

OBJECTIVES

Myocardial recovery is a rare phenomenon in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Surgical LVAD removal is associated with the risk of cardiac failure, and the individual evaluation of sufficient myocardial recovery is crucial. Thus, complete device explantation is not consistently performed to minimize perioperative risk. However, the remaining ventricular assist device components bear significant risks of infection or thrombosis. Therefore, we developed this study to evaluate a complete LVAD explantation protocol.

METHODS

All patients in our institution who had an LVAD explanted were enrolled in the study. Explant surgery involved removal of the driveline, pump housing, sewing ring and outflow graft. The ventricular wall was reconstructed by double patch plasty. Our analysis focused on surgical and postoperative outcome parameters, including all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients (HVAD, n = 5; HeartMate II, n = 3; HeartMate 3, n = 4) had myocardial recovery and qualified for our LVAD explantation study protocol [median age: 40 years, interquartile range (IQR) 33-52 years; 50% men]. Primary heart failure aetiology: myocarditis (n = 5), dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 4), toxic cardiomyopathy (n = 2) and valvular heart failure (n = 1). The median average duration on LVAD was 10 months (25-75%: IQR 8.5-30 months). The median left ventricular ejection fraction was 15% (IQR 13-18%) at LVAD implantation and 50% (IQR 45-50%) before LVAD explantation (P = 0.0025).The 30-day survival was 100%. The 1-year survival was 91.7%. All patients were discharged after a median 13 days (IQR 10-18 days) postoperatively. No patient had major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. The New York Heart Association functional class remained consistent during the follow-up period (median New York Heart Association functional class: II, IQR II-II class) including preservation of ventricular function.

CONCLUSIONS

Complete LVAD explantation with ventricular patch plasty is feasible and has consistent long-term results.

Weaning from ventricular assist device support after recovery from left ventricular failure with or without secondary right ventricular failure

Although complete myocardial recovery after ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is rather seldom, systematic search for recovery is worthwhile because for recovered patients weaning from VADs is feasible and can provide survival benefits with long-term freedom from heart failure (HF) recurrence, even if a chronic cardiomyopathy was the primary cause for the drug-refractory HF necessitating left ventricular (LVAD) or biventricular support (as bridge-to-transplantation or definitive therapy) and even if recovery remains incomplete. LVAD patients explanted for myoacardial recovery compared to those transplanted from LVAD support showed similar survival rates and a significant proportion of explanted patients can achieve cardiac and physical functional capacities that are within the normal range of healthy controls. In apparently sufficiently recovered patients, a major challenge remains still the pre-explant prediction of the weaning success which is meanwhile reliably possible for experienced clinicians. In weaning candidates, the combined use of certain echocardiography and right heart catheterization parameters recorded before VAD explantation can predict post-weaning cardiac stability with good accuracy. However, in the absence of standardization or binding recommendations, the protocols for assessment of native cardiac improvement and also the weaning criteria differ widely among centers. Currently there are still only few larger studies on myocardial recovery assessment after VAD implantation. Therefore, the weaning practice relies mostly on small case series, local practice patterns, and case reports, and the existing knowledge, as well as the partially differing recommendations which are based mainly on expert opinions, need to be periodically systematised. Addressing these shortcomings, our review aims to summarize the evidence and expert opinion on the evaluation of cardiac recovery during mechanical ventricular support by paying special attention to the reliability of the methods and parameters used for assessment of myocardial recovery and the challenges met in both evaluation of recovery and weaning decision making.

Heart failure in the young: Insights into myocardial recovery with ventricular assist device support

Background

Data on ventricular unloading-promoted myocardial recovery and post-weaning outcome in children is scarce. We analyzed the weaning outcome in children with heart failure (HF) supported with ventricular assist device (VAD).

Methods

A multi-institutional data on VAD implanted in 193 children and adolescents with HF between April 1990 and November 2015 was reviewed. Among them, 25 children (mean age 3.4±3.0, range, 0.058-16.3 years, 15 females) were weaned from VAD. Etiology of HF were myocarditis (n=11), dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP) (n=7), ischemic HF (n=3), arrhythmogenic CMP (n=1), post-correction of congenital heart disease (CHD) (n=1) and acute graft failure (n=1). Mean duration of HF before VAD implantation was 59.4±3 days.

Results

Age, duration of HF, DCMP, cardiac arrest and duration of VAD are essential clinical characteristics to delineate who may have the potential to myocardial recovery. Echocardiographic parameters pre-implantation, during the final off-pump trial and during the post-explantation follow-ups revealed that LVEF, LVEDD and relative wall thickness (RWT) showed significant differences (P<0.001) among patients stratified by outcome to assess recovery. Presently, 21 (84.0%) of the weaned patients are alive with their native hearts 1.3-19.1 years after VAD explantation. An additional weaned patient had HF recurrence 3 months post-weaning and was transplanted.

Conclusions

Post-weaning myocardial recovery and cardiac stability of children with HF from several etiologies supported with a VAD appears sustainable and durable. Young patients with short HF duration are more likely to recover. Absence of cardiac arrest, cardiac size, geometry and function may prospectively identify patients who may be likely to have myocardial recovery.

The role of ventricular assist device in children

The first and successful implantation of a ventricular assist device in 1990 has allowed an 8-year-old child with an end-stage heart failure to undergo a heart transplantation. This milestone paved the way to consider support with ventricular assist in the armamentarium of heart failure management in infants, children and adolescents. Several systems have evolved and faded owing to unacceptable complications. Indications and contraindications to implantation have been established. Anticoagulation management is still on its way to impeccability. Despite the challenges, issues and concerns revolving around ventricular assist devices, the system definitely supports pediatric patients with end-stage heart failure until heart transplantation and could allow recovery of the myocardium.

Ventricular systolic dysfunction with and without altered myocardial contractility: Clinical value of echocardiography for diagnosis and therapeutic decision-making

The inability of one of the two or both ventricles to contract normally and expel sufficient blood to meet the functional demands of the body results from a complex interplay between intrinsic abnormalities and extracardiac factors that limit ventricular pump function and is a major cause for heart failure (HF). Even if impaired myocardial contractile function was the primary cause for ventricular dysfunction, with the progression of systolic dysfunction, additionally developed diastolic dysfunction can also contribute to the severity of HF. Although at the first sight, the diagnosis of systolic HF appears quite easy because it is usually defined by reduction of the ejection fraction (EF), in reality this issue is far more complex because ventricular pumping performance depends not only on myocardial contractility, but also largely on loading conditions (preload and afterload), being also influenced by valvular function, ventricular interdependence, pericardial constraint, synchrony of ventricular contrac-tion and heart rhythm. Conventional echocardiography (ECHO) combined with new imaging techniques such as tissue Doppler and tissue tracking can detect early subclinical alteration of ventricular systolic function. However, no single ECHO parameter reveals alone the whole picture of systolic dysfunction. Multiparametric ECHO evaluation and the use of integrative approaches using ECHO-parameter combinations which include also the ventricular loading conditions appeared particularly useful especially for differentiation between primary (myocardial damage-induced) and secondary (hemodynamic overload-induced) systolic dysfunction. This review summarizes the available evidence on the usefulness and limitations of comprehensive evaluation of LV and RV systolic function by using all the currently available ECHO techniques.

Pediatric ventricular assist devices: what are the key considerations and requirements?

Introduction: The development of ventricular assist devices (VADs) have enabled myocardial recovery and improved patient survival until heart transplantation. However, device options remain limited for children and lag in development.Areas covered: This review focuses on the evolution of pediatric VADs in becoming to be an accepted treatment option in advanced heart failure, discusses the classification of VADs available for children, i.e. types of pumps and duration of support, and defines implantation indications and explantation criteria, describes attendant complications and long-term outcome of VAD support. Furthermore, we emphasize the key considerations and requirements in the application of these devices in infants, children and adolescents.Expert opinion: Increasing use of VADs has facilitated a leading edge in management of advanced heart failure either as a bridge to transplantation or as a bridge to myocardial recovery. In newborns and small children, the EXCOR Pediatric VAD remains the only reliable option. In some patients ventricular unloading may lead to complete myocardial recovery. There is a strong need for pumps that are fully implantable, suitable for single ventricle physiology, such as the right ventricle.

Hurdles to Cardioprotection in the Critically Ill

Cardiovascular disease is the largest contributor to worldwide mortality, and the deleterious impact of heart failure (HF) is projected to grow exponentially in the future. As heart transplantation (HTx) is the only effective treatment for end-stage HF, development of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) technology has unveiled additional therapeutic options for refractory cardiac disease. Unfortunately, despite both MCS and HTx being quintessential treatments for significant cardiac impairment, associated morbidity and mortality remain high. MCS technology continues to evolve, but is associated with numerous disturbances to cardiac function (e.g., oxidative damage, arrhythmias). Following MCS intervention, HTx is frequently the destination option for survival of critically ill cardiac patients. While effective, donor hearts are scarce, thus limiting HTx to few qualifying patients, and HTx remains correlated with substantial post-HTx complications. While MCS and HTx are vital to survival of critically ill cardiac patients, cardioprotective strategies to improve outcomes from these treatments are highly desirable. Accordingly, this review summarizes the current status of MCS and HTx in the clinic, and the associated cardiac complications inherent to these treatments. Furthermore, we detail current research being undertaken to improve cardiac outcomes following MCS/HTx, and important considerations for reducing the significant morbidity and mortality associated with these necessary treatment strategies.

Evaluation of Cardiac Recovery in Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: Particularities, Reliability, and Practical Challenges

In carefully selected patients with ventricular assist devices (VADs), good long-term results after device weaning and explantation can be achieved when reverse remodelling and improvement of native cardiac function occur. Monitoring of cardiac size, geometry, and function after initial VAD implantation is necessary to identify such patients. Formal guidelines for recovery assessment in patients with VADs do not exist, and protocols for recovery assessment and criteria for device weaning and explantation vary among centres. Barriers to evaluation of cardiac recovery include technical problems in obtaining echo images in patients with VADs, time restrictions for necessary VAD reductions/interruptions during assessment, and regurgitant flow patterns that occur with interruption of continuous flow VADs. The few larger studies addressing cardiac recovery after VAD implantation employed varied study designs, limiting interpretation. Current clinical practice is guided largely by local practice patterns, case reports, and small case series, and the available body of research-consisting mostly of expert opinions-has not been systematically addressed. This summary reviews evidence and expert opinion on VAD-promoted cardiac recovery assessment, its reliability, and associated challenges.

Heart failure 2016: still more questions than answers

Heart failure has reached epidemic proportions given the ageing of populations and is associated with high mortality and re-hospitalization rates. This article reviews and summarizes recent advances in the diagnosis, assessment and treatment of the patients with heart failure. Data are discussed based also on the most recent guidelines indications. Open issues and unmet needs are highlighted.

New Management Strategies in Heart Failure

Despite >100 clinical trials, only 2 new drugs had been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of chronic heart failure in more than a decade: the aldosterone antagonist eplerenone in 2003 and a fixed dose combination of hydralazine-isosorbide dinitrate in 2005. In contrast, 2015 has witnessed the Food and Drug Administration approval of 2 new drugs, both for the treatment of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: ivabradine and another combination drug, sacubitril/valsartan or LCZ696. Seemingly overnight, a range of therapeutic possibilities, evoking new physiological mechanisms, promise great hope for a disease that often carries a prognosis worse than many forms of cancer. Importantly, the newly available therapies represent a culmination of basic and translational research that actually spans many decades. This review will summarize newer drugs currently being used in the treatment of heart failure, as well as newer strategies increasingly explored for their utility during the stages of the heart failure syndrome.

Left ventricular assist devices: current controversies and future directions

Advanced heart failure is a growing epidemic that leads to significant suffering and economic losses. The development of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) has led to improved quality of life and long-term survival for patients diagnosed with this devastating condition. This review briefly summarizes the short history and clinical outcomes of LVADs and focuses on the current controversies and issues facing LVAD therapy. Finally, the future directions for the role of LVADs in the treatment of end-stage heart failure are discussed.

Bridge to removal: a paradigm shift for left ventricular assist device therapy

Ventricular assist devices have become standard therapy for patients with advanced heart failure either as a bridge to transplantation or destination therapy. Despite the functional and biologic evidence of reverse cardiac remodeling, few patients actually proceed to myocardial recovery, and even fewer to the point of having their device explanted. An enhanced understanding of the biology and care of the mechanically supported patient has redirected focus on the possibility of using ventricular assist devices as a bridge to myocardial recovery and removal. Herein, we review the current issues and approaches to transforming myocardial recovery to a practical reality.