Pathophysiological pathways related to high plasma GDF-15 concentrations in patients with heart failure

2024 update in heart failure

In the last years, major progress has occurred in heart failure (HF) management. The 2023 ESC focused update of the 2021 HF guidelines introduced new key recommendations based on the results of the last years of science. First, two drugs, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal, selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), are recommended for the prevention of HF in patients with diabetic chronic kidney disease (CKD). Second, SGLT2 inhibitors are now recommended for the treatment of HF across the entire left ventricular ejection fraction spectrum. The benefits of quadruple therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established. Its rapid and early up-titration along with a close follow-up with frequent clinical and laboratory re-assessment after an episode of acute HF (the so-called 'high-intensity care' strategy) was associated with better outcomes in the STRONG-HF trial. Patients experiencing an episode of worsening HF might require a fifth drug, vericiguat. In the STEP-HFpEF-DM and STEP-HFpEF trials, semaglutide 2.4 mg once weekly administered for 1 year decreased body weight and significantly improved quality of life and the 6 min walk distance in obese patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) with or without a history of diabetes. Further data on safety and efficacy, including also hard endpoints, are needed to support the addition of acetazolamide or hydrochlorothiazide to a standard diuretic regimen in patients hospitalized due to acute HF. In the meantime, PUSH-AHF supported the use of natriuresis-guided diuretic therapy. Further options and most recent evidence for the treatment of HF, including specific drugs for cardiomyopathies (i.e., mavacamten in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and tafamidis in transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis), device therapies, cardiac contractility modulation and percutaneous treatment of valvulopathies, with the recent finding from the TRILUMINATE Pivotal trial, are also reviewed in this article.

Circulating growth differentiation factor-15 levels are associated with early echocardiographic signs of diastolic function impairment in the STANISLAS cohort: A 20-year follow-up study

AIMS

Early identification of healthy subjects prone to develop cardiac dysfunction may be instrumental to prevention strategies. Our study aimed to evaluate whether circulating levels of growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) could predict adverse changes in echocardiographic indexes of cardiac structure and function in an initially healthy populational familial cohort with a long follow-up (STANISLAS cohort).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated 1679 participants (49 ± 14 years, 48% males) included in the fourth visit (V4) of the STANISLAS cohort with available GDF-15 measurements (Olink proteomic analysis) and echocardiographic parameters. Among them, 1562 had also GDF-15 measurements at the first visit (V1) (18.2 ± 1.4 years before V4). We evaluated both prospective (GDF-15 at V1) and cross-sectional (GDF-15 at V4) associations between GDF-15 levels and echocardiographic variables. In adjusted analyses, higher baseline GDF-15 levels were associated with lower left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume and higher E/e' ratio nearly two decades later (both p ≤ 0.01). The cross-sectional analysis at V4 also found significant associations between GDF-15 and LV end-diastolic volume and higher E/e' ratio, further identifying significant associations with impaired LV strain.

CONCLUSION

In the STANISLAS cohort, initial circulating GDF-15 levels were associated with echocardiographic signs of reduced LV size and increased filling pressure almost two decades later. This association was also confirmed by evaluating GDF-15 at the follow-up visit (V4). These findings suggest a potential role for GDF-15 as an easy screening and prognostic tool of diastolic dysfunction in the general population.

Biomarker profiles associated with reverse ventricular remodelling in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: Insights from the echocardiographic substudy of the VICTORIA trial

AIMS

Reverse ventricular remodelling, defined as a decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVI) or an increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), is associated with improved clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain unclear.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We evaluated paired core-lab assessed echocardiograms and measurements of 92 biomarkers at baseline and 8 months thereafter in 419 participants with HFrEF. Reverse ventricular remodelling was defined as a >5% LVEF increase or >15% LVESVI relative decrease between baseline and 8 months. We evaluated the association between baseline biomarkers and their changes with reverse ventricular remodelling in the prospectively randomized controlled VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial. Of 419 patients (median age 66 [interquartile range 57-74] years, 27.4% women), 206 (49.2%) had reverse ventricular remodelling (either a 5% LVEF increase or a 15% LVESVI decrease). There were no differences in baseline biomarker concentrations between patients with versus those without reverse ventricular remodelling on follow-up. However, in patients with reverse ventricular remodelling there were significant decreases in biomarkers relating to inflammation and cardiac metabolism; particularly the tumour necrosis factor superfamily member 13B (ratio 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.88), growth differentiation factor-15 (ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.84), and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 7 (ratio 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

Reverse ventricular remodelling in patients with HFrEF is associated with a decrease of biomarkers related to inflammation and cardiac metabolism.

Association between growth differentiation factor-15 and adverse outcomes among patients with heart failure: A systematic literature review

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is an emerging biomarker in several conditions. This SLR, conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examined the association between GDF-15 concentration and range of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF). Publications were identified from Embase® and Medline® bibliographic databases between January 1, 2014, and August 23, 2022 (congress abstracts: January 1, 2020, to August 23, 2022). Sixty-three publications met the eligibility criteria (55 manuscripts and 8 abstracts; 45 observational studies and 18 post hoc analyses of randomized controlled trials [RCTs]). Of the 19 outcomes identified, the most frequently reported longitudinal outcomes were mortality (n = 32 studies; all-cause [n = 27] or cardiovascular-related [n = 6]), composite outcomes (n = 28; most commonly mortality ± hospitalization/rehospitalization [n = 19]), and hospitalization/re-hospitalization (n = 11). The most common cross-sectional outcome was renal function (n = 22). Among longitudinal studies assessing independent relationships with outcomes using multivariate analyses (MVA), a significant increase in risk associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentration was found in 22/24 (92 %) studies assessing all-cause mortality, 4/5 (80 %) assessing cardiovascular-related mortality, 13/19 (68 %) assessing composite outcomes, and 4/8 (50 %) assessing hospitalization/rehospitalization. All (7/7; 100 %) of the cross-sectional studies assessing the relationship with renal function by MVA, and 3/4 (75 %) assessing exercise capacity, found poorer outcomes associated with higher baseline GDF-15 concentrations. This SLR suggests GDF-15 is an independent predictor of mortality and other adverse but nonfatal outcomes in patients with HF. A better understanding of the prognostic role of GDF-15 in HF could improve clinical risk prediction models and potentially help optimize treatment regimens.

A method of quantitative chemiluminescence immunoassay for the concentration of Growth differentiation factor-15

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15), a member of the transforming growth factor (TGF-β) superfamily, and is expressed and secreted in response to inflammation, oxidative stress and hypoxia. It has been shown in several studies to be a predictor of heart failure. However, the only kits available on the market are ELISA kits, which are costly and error-prone and are not conducive for clinical use. Here, we developed a chemiluminescence kit which optimized the reaction conditions and the reaction time was reduced to 10 min. We further proved that it can be used to measure GDF-15 in serum or plasma accurately and fastly, and provide additional information for the diagnosis of heart failure disease. Methodological comparison and clinical study verified this method is a reliable, economical and highly automated blood test method.•All necessary steps and the reagents needed are provided.•Reliability of the chemiluminescence immunoassay was verified by analyzing serum GDF-15 levels from different groups.•GDF-15 can provide clinicians with reliable prediction and disease assessment of heart failure.

Identification of molecular markers for predicting the severity of heart failure after AMI: An Olink precision proteomic study

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) still has a high incidence of varying degrees of heart failure (HF). The aim of this study is to identify new molecular markers for predicting the severity of HF after AMI.

METHODS

We analyzed demographic indicators, past medical history, clinical indicators, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and molecular markers in patients with different Killip classifications after AMI. Olink proteomics was used to explore new molecular markers for predicting different severity of HF after AMI.

RESULTS

Neutrophil count was the independent risk factors for in-hospital MACEs. Nineteen differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) increased significantly with increasing Killip classification. Five DEPs were also found to have an AUC (95 % CI) value greater than 0.8: GDF-15, NT-pro BNP, TNF-R2, TNF-R1 and TFF3.

CONCLUSIONS

Neutrophil count, GDF-15, TNF-R2, TNF-R1 and TFF3 were closely related to the Killip classification of HF after AMI, which suggests that the inflammatory response plays an important role in the severity of HF after AMI and that regulating inflammation might become a new target for controlling HF.

Growth differentiation factor-15 and the effect of empagliflozin in heart failure: Findings from the EMPEROR program

AIMS

Growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) is upregulated in part in response to cardiomyocyte stretch and stress, and it exerts a protective role that is mediated by its action to suppress signalling through insulin-like growth factor (IGF) and enhance signalling through adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve outcomes in heart failure, which has been experimentally linked to AMPK. This study aimed at evaluating the associations of GDF-15 with baseline characteristics, the prognostic significance of GDF-15, and the effect of empagliflozin on GDF-15 in patients with heart failure with a reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Growth differentiation factor-15 was determined in serum samples from the EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved trials. Cox regression and mixed models for repeated measures were used to study the association with outcomes and the effect of empagliflozin on GDF-15, respectively. We studied 1124 patients (560 placebo and 564 empagliflozin) with median GDF-15 levels at baseline of 2442 (interquartile range 1603-3780) pg/ml. Patients with higher GDF-15 levels were typically older men with more severe symptoms, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, worse kidney function and who were prescribed metformin. Baseline levels of GDF-15 were well correlated with levels of IGF-binding protein 7 (rho = 0.64). Higher levels of GDF-15 were independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular death, heart failure hospitalizations, and worse kidney outcomes. When considered as a continuous variable, for each doubling in GDF-15, the adjusted hazard ratio for cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization was 1.40 (95% confidence interval 1.15-1.71; p < 0.001). The relative effect of empagliflozin on cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure was most pronounced in patients with higher baseline levels of GDF-15 (interaction p-trend = 0.031). At week 52, when compared with placebo, empagliflozin increased GDF-15 by an additional 8% (p = 0.020), an effect that was primarily seen in patients not receiving metformin, a known AMPK activator.

CONCLUSIONS

Growth differentiation factor-15 is a marker of worse heart failure severity, is an independent predictor of major heart failure outcomes and may be associated with more pronounced benefits of empagliflozin. GDF-15 is increased among metformin users, and empagliflozin was associated with an increase in GDF-15 levels, primarily in patients not receiving metformin.

Prognostic value of Growth differentiation factors 15 in Acute heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

There is an increasing proportion of hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients classified as HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) around the world. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a promising biomarker in HFpEF prognostication; however, the majority of the existing data has been derived from the research on undifferentiated HF, whereas the studies focusing on HFpEF are still limited. This study aimed to determine the prognostic power of GDF-15 in the hospitalized patients with HFpEF in a Chinese cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed the levels of serum GDF-15 in 380 patients hospitalized for acute onset of HFpEF measured by heart ultrasound at admission in a prospective cohort. The associations of GDF-15 with 1 year risk of all-cause death and 1 year HF readmission were assessed by the Cox proportional hazards model. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves was used to compare predictive accuracy. GDF-15 was strongly correlated with 1 year HF readmission and 1 year all-cause death, with event rates of 24.8%, 40.0%, and 50.0% for 1 year HF readmission (P < 0.001), respectively, and with 11.2%, 13.6%, and 24.6% for 1 year all-cause death (P = 0.004) in the corresponding tertile, respectively. In the multivariate linear regression model, GDF-15 had a significantly negative correlation with haemoglobin (P = 0.01) and a positive correlation with creatinine (P = 0.01), alanine transaminase (P = 0.001), and therapy of aldosterone antagonist (P = 0.018). The univariate Cox regression model of GDF-15 showed that c-statistic was 0.632 for 1 year HF readmission and 0.644 for 1 year all-cause death, which were superior to the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) model with c-statistics of 0.595 and 0.610, respectively. In the multivariable Cox regression model, GDF-15 tertiles independently predicted 1 year HF readmission (hazard ratio 2.25, 95% confidence interval: 1.43-3.54, P < 0.001) after adjusting for baseline Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure (ASCEND-HF) risk score, history of HF, NT-proBNP, and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Compared with the model including all the adjusted variables, the model with the addition of GDF-15 improved predictive power, with c-statistic increasing from 0.643 to 0.657 for 1 year HF readmission and from 0.638 to 0.660 for 1 year all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

In hospitalized patients with HFpEF, GDF-15 measured within 48 h of admission is a strong independent biomarker for 1 year HF readmission and even better than NT-proBNP. GDF-15 combined with the traditional indicators provided incremental prognostic value in this population.

The Role of Leukocyte Immunoglobulin-Like Receptors Focusing on the Therapeutic Implications of the Subfamily B2

The leukocyte immunoglobulin (Ig)-like receptors (LILRs) are constituted by five inhibitory subpopulations (LILRB1-5) and six stimulatory subpopulations (LILRA1-6). The LILR populations substantially reside in immune cells, especially myeloid cells, functioning as a regulator in immunosuppressive and immunostimulatory responses, during which the nonclassical major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules are widely involved. In addition, LILRs are also distributed in certain tumor cells, implicated in the malignancy progression. Collectively, the suppressive Ig-like LILRB2 is relatively well-studied to date. Herein, we summarized the whole family of LILRs and their biologic function in various diseases upon ligation to the critical ligands, therefore providing more information on their potential roles in these pathological processes and giving the clinical significance of strategies targeting LILRs.

A Single-Cell Survey of Cellular Heterogeneity in Human Great Saphenous Veins

Background: The great saphenous vein (GSV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary arterial bypass graft. However, the status of the GSV, including metabolic dysfunction such as diabetes mellitus (DM) complication, is strongly associated with vein graft failure (VGF). To date, the molecular mechanism underlying VGF remains elusive. Detailed characterization of the cellular components and corresponding expression regulation in GSVs would be of great importance for clinical decision making to reduce VGF. Methods: To this end, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing to delineate cellular heterogeneity in three human GSV samples. Results: Scrutinization of cellular composition and expression revealed cell diversity in human GSVs, particularly endothelial cells (ECs). Our results unraveled that functional adaptation drove great expression differences between venous ECs and valvular ECs. For instance, cell surface receptor ACKR1 demarcated venous Ecs, whereas ACRK3/ACKR4 were exclusively expressed by valvular ECs. Differential gene expression analysis suggested that genes highly expressed in venous ECs were mainly involved in vasculature development and regulation of leukocyte adhesion, whereas valvular ECs have more pronounced expression of genes participating in extracellular matrix organization, ossification and platelet degranulation. Of note, pseudo-time trajectory analysis provided in silico evidence indicating that venous ECs, valvular ECs and lymphatic vessels were developmentally connected. Further, valvular ECs might be an importance source for lymphatic vessel differentiation in adults. Additionally, we found a venous EC subset highly expressing IL6, which might be associated with undesirable prognosis. Meanwhile, we identified a population of ANGPTL7+ fibroblasts (FBs), which may be profibrotic and involved in insulin resistance in human GSVs. Additionally, our data suggest that immune cells only accounted for a small fraction, most of which were macrophages. By assessing the intertwined remodeling in metabolic dysfunction that potentially increases the gene expression regulatory network in mural cells and leukocytes, we found that transcription factor KLF9 likely operated a proinflammatory program, inducing the transcription of metallothionein proteins in two mural cell subsets and proinflammatory immune cells. Lastly, cellular communication analysis revealed that proinflammatory signaling, including TRAIL, PVR, CSF and GDF, were uniquely activated in patients with metabolic dysfunction. Conclusions: Our results identified critical cell-specific responses and cellular interactions in GSVs. Beyond serving as a repertoire, this work illustrates multifactorial likelihood of VGF.

Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) in cardiovascular diseases: predicting bleeding after cardiac surgery and beyond that!

No Abstract.