Prognostic value of three iron deficiency definitions in patients with advanced heart failure

Iron metabolism biomarkers and mortality risk in U.S. patients with congestive heart failure: NHANES 1999-2018 analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Iron deficiency is a major public health concern. We aimed to assess the predictive capability of 4 iron metabolism biomarkers for all-cause and cardiovascular disease-specific mortality in U.S. patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

1904 CHF patients aged ≥20 years were enrolled from NHANES, 1999-2000 to 2017-2018. All analyses were weighted to provide nationally representative estimates. Among 1905 CHF patients, mean age was 71 years, and 1024 (53.8%), 459 (24.1%), 206 (10.8%), and 216 (11.3%) were Non-Hispanic Black, Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic-Mexican American, and Hispanic-Other Hispanic, respectively. During follow-ups, 1080 deaths occurred. Median follow-up time was 5.08 years. Per-unit increase in natural-logarithmic-transformed iron and transferrin saturation decreased all-cause mortality risk separately by 33.0% (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.670, 95% confidence interval: 0.563 to 0.797, P < 0.001) and 32.6% (0.674, 0.495 to 0.917, 0.013), and per-unit increase in transferrin receptor increased mortality risk by 33.7% (1.337, 1.104 to 1.618, 0.004). Two derivates from 3 significant iron biomarkers were generated - transferrin receptor to natural-logarithmic-transformed iron ratio (TRI) and transferrin receptor to natural-logarithmic-transformed transferrin saturation ratio (TRTS), which were significantly associated with all-cause mortality, with per-unit increase corresponding to 2.692- and 1.655-fold increased all-cause mortality risk (P: 0.003 and 0.023). Only iron and TRTS were associated with the significant risk of cardiovascular disease-specific mortality (P: 0.004 and 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identified 3 iron metabolism biomarkers that were individually, significantly, and independently associated with all-cause mortality in patients with CHF, and importantly 2 derivates generated exhibited stronger predictive capability.

Iron deficiency in new onset heart failure: association with clinical factors and quality of life

AIMS

The prevalence of iron deficiency (ID) in newly diagnosed heart failure (HF) and the progression of ID in patients after initiation of HF therapy are unknown. We aimed to describe the natural trajectory of ID in patients with new onset HF during the first year after HF diagnosis, assessing associations between ID, clinical factors, and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A prospective cohort of patients with new onset HF in hospitals or outpatient clinics at five major hospitals in Stockholm, Sweden, during 2015-2018 were analysed with clinical assessment, electrocardiogram, blood samples including iron levels, Minnesota living with heart failure questionnaire (MLHFQ), and echocardiogram at baseline and after 12 months. Of 547 patients with new-onset HF, 482 (88%) had complete iron data at baseline. Median age was 70 years (interquartile range 61-77) and 311 (65%) were men; 55% of patients had ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 40%, 19% had EF 41-49%, and 26% had HF with preserved EF (HFpEF) [Correction added on 26 June 2024, after first online publication: The 'Mean age was 70 years' has been corrected to 'Median age was 70 years' in this version.]. At baseline, 163 patients (34%) had ID defined as ferritin <100 μg/L or ferritin 100-299 μg/L and transferrin saturation <20%. After 12 months of follow-up, 119 (32%) had ID of the 368 patients who had complete iron data both at baseline and after 12 months and did not receive intravenous (i.v.) iron during follow-up. During the first year after HF diagnosis, 19% had persistent ID, 13% developed ID, 11% resolved ID, and 57% never had ID, consequently 24% changed their classification. Anaemia at baseline was the strongest independent predictor of ID 1 year after diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.88-8.13, P < 0.001], followed by HF hospitalization (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.24-3.95, P < 0.01), female sex (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25-3.32, P < 0.01), HFpEF (OR 1.96, 95% CI 1.13-3.39, P < 0.05), and diabetes mellitus (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.06-3.48, P < 0.05). ID was associated with low QoL at baseline (MLHFQ score mean difference 7.4 points, 95% CI 3.1-11.7, P < 0.001), but not at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

About one third of patients with new onset HF had ID both at the time of HF diagnosis and after 1 year, though a quarter of the patients changed their ID status. Patients with anaemia, HF hospitalization, female gender, HFpEF, or diabetes mellitus at baseline were more likely to have ID after 1 year implying that these should be carefully screened for ID to find those in need of i.v. iron treatment.

Malnutrition and Allergies: Tipping the Immune Balance towards Health

Malnutrition, which includes macro- and micronutrient deficiencies, is common in individuals with allergic dermatitis, food allergies, rhinitis, and asthma. Prolonged deficiencies of proteins, minerals, and vitamins promote Th2 inflammation, setting the stage for allergic sensitization. Consequently, malnutrition, which includes micronutrient deficiencies, fosters the development of allergies, while an adequate supply of micronutrients promotes immune cells with regulatory and tolerogenic phenotypes. As protein and micronutrient deficiencies mimic an infection, the body's innate response limits access to these nutrients by reducing their dietary absorption. This review highlights our current understanding of the physiological functions of allergenic proteins, iron, and vitamin A, particularly regarding their reduced bioavailability under inflamed conditions, necessitating different dietary approaches to improve their absorption. Additionally, the role of most allergens as nutrient binders and their involvement in nutritional immunity will be briefly summarized. Their ability to bind nutrients and their close association with immune cells can trigger exaggerated immune responses and allergies in individuals with deficiencies. However, in nutrient-rich conditions, these allergens can also provide nutrients to immune cells and promote health.

Iron Deficiency in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Iron deficiency is a common and independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure. The implications of iron deficiency in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are less established. This review recaps data on the prevalence, characteristics and impact of Iron deficiency in the LVAD population. A systematic search yielded eight studies involving 517 LVAD patients, with iron deficiency prevalence ranging from 40% to 82%. IV iron repletion was not associated with adverse events and effectively resolved iron deficiency in most patients. However, the effects of iron deficiency and iron repletion on post-implant survival and exercise capacity remain unknown. Although iron deficiency is highly prevalent in LVAD patients, its true prevalence and adverse effects may be misestimated due to inexact diagnostic criteria. Future randomised controlled trials on IV iron treatment in LVAD patients are warranted to clarify the significance of this common comorbidity.

Identification of three mechanistic pathways for iron-deficient heart failure

Current understanding of iron-deficient heart failure is based on blood tests that are thought to reflect systemic iron stores, but the available evidence suggests greater complexity. The entry and egress of circulating iron is controlled by erythroblasts, which (in severe iron deficiency) will sacrifice erythropoiesis to supply iron to other organs, e.g. the heart. Marked hypoferraemia (typically with anaemia) can drive the depletion of cardiomyocyte iron, impairing contractile performance and explaining why a transferrin saturation < ≈15%-16% predicts the ability of intravenous iron to reduce the risk of major heart failure events in long-term trials (Type 1 iron-deficient heart failure). However, heart failure may be accompanied by intracellular iron depletion within skeletal muscle and cardiomyocytes, which is disproportionate to the findings of systemic iron biomarkers. Inflammation- and deconditioning-mediated skeletal muscle dysfunction-a primary cause of dyspnoea and exercise intolerance in patients with heart failure-is accompanied by intracellular skeletal myocyte iron depletion, which can be exacerbated by even mild hypoferraemia, explaining why symptoms and functional capacity improve following intravenous iron, regardless of baseline haemoglobin or changes in haemoglobin (Type 2 iron-deficient heart failure). Additionally, patients with advanced heart failure show myocardial iron depletion due to both diminished entry into and enhanced egress of iron from the myocardium; the changes in iron proteins in the cardiomyocytes of these patients are opposite to those expected from systemic iron deficiency. Nevertheless, iron supplementation can prevent ventricular remodelling and cardiomyopathy produced by experimental injury in the absence of systemic iron deficiency (Type 3 iron-deficient heart failure). These observations, taken collectively, support the possibility of three different mechanistic pathways for the development of iron-deficient heart failure: one that is driven through systemic iron depletion and impaired erythropoiesis and two that are characterized by disproportionate depletion of intracellular iron in skeletal and cardiac muscle. These mechanisms are not mutually exclusive, and all pathways may be operative at the same time or may occur sequentially in the same patients.

Iron deficiency and supplementation in patients with heart failure: Results from the IRON-HF international survey

AIMS

Iron deficiency (ID) is common in patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with poor outcomes, regardless of anaemia status. Iron supplementation has been demonstrated to improve exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with HF with an ejection fraction <50% and ID. This survey aimed to provide data on real-world practices related to ID screening and management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We designed and distributed an online survey (23 questions) regarding ID screening and management in the HF setting. Overall, 256 cardiologists completed the survey (59.8% male, mostly between 30 and 50 years). The majority of physicians defined ID according to the most recent HF recommendations (98.4%) and reported screening for ID in more than half of their patients (68.4%). However, only 54.3% of the respondents performed periodic screening (every 6 months to 1 year). A total of 93.0% of participants prescribed and/or administered iron supplementation, using intravenous iron as the preferred method of administration (86.3%). After iron supplementation, 96.1% of the respondents reassessed ID, most frequently at 3-6 months (67.6%). Most physicians (93.8%) perceived ID as an underestimated comorbidity in HF. Cardiologists' age, training status, subspecialty and work setting (academic vs. non-academic hospitals) were associated with heterogeneity in the answers.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this survey highlight the need for more consistent strategies of ID screening and treatment for patients with HF.

Critical re-evaluation of the identification of iron deficiency states and effective iron repletion strategies in patients with chronic heart failure

According to current guidelines, iron deficiency is defined by a serum ferritin level <100 ng/ml or a transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20% if the serum ferritin level is 100-299 μg/L. These criteria were developed to encourage the use of intravenous iron as an adjunct to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in the treatment of renal anaemia. However, in patients with heart failure, these criteria are not supported by any pathophysiological or clinical evidence that they identify an absolute or functional iron deficiency state. A low baseline TSAT-but not serum ferritin level-appears to be a reliable indicator of the effect of intravenous iron to reduce major heart failure events. In randomized controlled trials, intravenous iron decreased the risk of cardiovascular death or total heart failure hospitalization in patients with a TSAT <20% (risk ratio 0.67 [0.49-0.92]) but not in patients with a TSAT ≥20% (risk ratio 0.99 [0.74-1.30]), with the magnitude of the risk reduction being proportional to the severity of hypoferraemia. Patients who were enrolled in clinical trials solely because they had a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L showed no significant benefit on heart failure outcomes, and it is noteworthy that serum ferritin levels of 20-300 μg/L lie entirely within the range of normal values for healthy adults. Current guidelines reflect the eligibility criteria of clinical trials, which inadvertently adopted unvalidated criteria to define iron deficiency. Reliance on these guidelines would lead to the treatment of many patients who are not iron deficient (serum ferritin level <100 μg/L but normal TSAT) and ignores the possibility of iron deficiency in patients with a low TSAT but with serum ferritin level of >300 μg/L. Importantly, analyses of benefit based on trial eligibility-driven guidelines substantially underestimate the magnitude of heart-failure-event risk reduction with intravenous iron in patients who are truly iron deficient. Based on all available data, we recommend a new mechanism-based and trial-tested approach that reflects the totality of evidence more faithfully than the historical process adopted by clinical investigators and by the guidelines. Until additional evidence is forthcoming, an iron deficiency state in patients with heart failure should be defined by a TSAT <20% (as long as the serum ferritin level is <400 μg/L), and furthermore, the use of a serum ferritin level <100 μg/L alone as a diagnostic criterion should be discarded.

Nutrition in chronic inflammatory conditions: Bypassing the mucosal block for micronutrients

Nutritional Immunity is one of the most ancient innate immune responses, during which the body can restrict nutrients availability to pathogens and restricts their uptake by the gut mucosa (mucosal block). Though this can be a beneficial strategy during infection, it also is associated with non-communicable diseases-where the pathogen is missing; leading to increased morbidity and mortality as micronutritional uptake and distribution in the body is hindered. Here, we discuss the acute immune response in respect to nutrients, the opposing nutritional demands of regulatory and inflammatory cells and particularly focus on some nutrients linked with inflammation such as iron, vitamins A, Bs, C, and other antioxidants. We propose that while the absorption of certain micronutrients is hindered during inflammation, the dietary lymph path remains available. As such, several clinical trials investigated the role of the lymphatic system during protein absorption, following a ketogenic diet and an increased intake of antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals, in reducing inflammation and ameliorating disease.