Population and life-stage-specific effects of two herbicide formulations on the aquatic development of European common frogs (Rana temporaria)

Effects of perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids on developmental, physiological, and immunological measures in northern leopard frog tadpoles

The chronic toxicity of short chain perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs), such as perfluorobutanesulfonic acid (PFBS) and perfluorohexanesulfonic acid (PFHxS), are relatively understudied despite the increasing detection of these compounds in the environment. We investigated the chronic toxicity and bioconcentration of PFBS and PFHxS using northern leopard frog (Rana [Lithobates] pipiens) tadpoles. We exposed Gosner stage (GS) 25 tadpoles to either PFBS or PFHxS at nominal concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10, 100, and 1000 μg/L until metamorphosis (GS42). We then assessed tadpole growth, development, stress, and immune metrics, and measured fatty acid (FA) composition and PFSA concentrations in liver and whole-body tissues. Tadpole growth and development measures were relatively unaffected by PFSA exposure. However, tadpoles exposed to 1000 μg/L PFBS or PFHxS had significantly increased hepatosomatic indexes (HSI) relative to controls. Further, tadpoles from the 1000 μg/L PFHxS treatment had altered FA profiles relative to controls, with increased total FAs, saturated FAs, monounsaturated FAs, and omega-6 polyunsaturated FAs. In addition, tadpoles from the 1000 μg/L PFHxS treatment had a higher probability of waterborne corticosterone detection. These results suggest that PFBS and PFHxS influence the hepatic health of tadpoles, and that PFHxS may alter lipid metabolism in tadpoles. We also observed a higher probability of tadpoles being phenotypically female after exposure to an environmentally relevant concentration (0.1 μg/L) of PFHxS, suggesting that PFHxS may exert endocrine disrupting effects on tadpoles during early development. The measured bioconcentration factors (BCFs) for both compounds were ≤10 L kg-1 wet weight, suggesting low bioconcentration potential for PFBS and PFHxS in tadpoles. Many of the significant effects observed in this study occurred at concentrations several orders of magnitude above those measured in the environment; however, our work shows effects of PFSAs exposure on amphibians and provides essential information for ecological risk assessments of these compounds.

Low temperatures lead to higher toxicity of the fungicide folpet to larval stages of Rana temporaria and Bufotes viridis

Pesticides are one of the main drivers of the worldwide amphibian decline. Their actual toxicity depends on a number of factors, like the species in focus or the developmental stage of exposed individuals. As ectothermic species, the metabolism of amphibians is influenced by ambient temperature. Therefore, temperature also affects metabolic rates and thus processes that might enhance or reduce toxic effects. Studies about the interactive effect of temperature and toxicity on amphibians are rare and deliver contrasting results. To investigate the temperature-dependent pesticide sensitivity of larvae of two European species we conducted acute toxicity tests for the viticultural fungicide Folpan® 500 SC with the active ingredient folpet at different temperatures (6°C, 11°C, 16°C, 21°C, 26°C). Sensitivity of Rana temporaria and Bufotes viridis was highly affected by temperature: early larvae (Gosner stage 20) were about twice more sensitive to Folpan® 500 SC at 6°C compared to 21°C. Next to temperature, species and developmental stage of larvae had an effect on sensitivity. The most sensitive individuals (early stages of R. temporaria at 6°C) were 14.5 times more sensitive than the least sensitive ones (early stages of B. viridis at 26°C). Our results raise concerns about typical ecotoxicological studies with amphibians that are often conducted at temperatures between 15°C and 20°C. We suggest that future test designs should be performed at temperatures that reflect the temperature range amphibians are exposed to in their natural habitats. Variations in the sensitivity due to temperature should also be considered as an uncertainty factor in upcoming environmental risk assessments for amphibians.

Co-formulants and adjuvants affect the acute aquatic and terrestrial toxicity of a cycloxydim herbicide formulation to European common frogs (Rana temporaria)

While pesticides are generally recognized as contributing to amphibian declines, there is a lack of knowledge about effects of co-formulants that are present in pesticide formulations and adjuvants which are mixed with these formulations. Since aquatic and terrestrial stages of amphibians can be exposed to these substances, adverse effects cannot be excluded. We investigated acute aquatic and terrestrial effects of the herbicide formulation Focus® Ultra, its active substance cycloxydim, its co-formulants solvent naphtha and docusate as well as the stabilizing adjuvant Dash® E.C. on larval and juvenile Rana temporaria. Aquatic toxicity was determined as 96-h LC50 values. Cycloxydim was the least toxic and solvent naphtha the most toxic substance of the formulation. The addition of Dash® E.C. increased the formulation toxicity substantially. Terrestrial toxicity was determined as lethal effects after a 48-h exposure to contaminated soil with 100% of the recommended field rate (FR) and as sublethal effects after the exposure to 10% of the recommended FR. The exposure to solvent naphtha and docusate at 100% FR led to mortalities of 42-100% probably due to their inhalation toxicity and dermal as well as eye irritation, respectively. Cycloxydim, Focus® Ultra and Dash® E.C. did not lead to any mortality. Sublethal effects on juvenile locomotor activity (i.e. moved distance) were observed for cycloxydim and the combined exposure of Focus® Ultra and Dash® E.C. Juvenile body masses declined significantly for all substances except for cycloxydim. The present results show that aquatic sensitivity does not predict terrestrial sensitivity. It was shown that pesticide toxicity for amphibians can highly depend on the presence and amount of co-formulants and added adjuvants. Therefore, substances included in pesticide formulations which are known to be toxic by inhalation or harmful to eyes or skin should be specifically considered in the environmental risk assessment for amphibians.

Avoidance behavior of juvenile common toads (Bufo bufo) in response to surface contamination by different pesticides

Most agricultural soils are expected to be contaminated with agricultural chemicals. As the exposure to pesticides can have adverse effects on non-target organisms, avoiding contaminated areas would be advantageous on an individual level, but could lead to a chemical landscape fragmentation with disadvantages on the metapopulation level. We investigated the avoidance behavior of juvenile common toads (Bufo bufo) in response to seven pesticide formulations commonly used in German vineyards. We used test arenas filled with silica sand and oversprayed half of each with different pesticide formulations. We placed a toad in the middle of an arena, filmed its behavior over 24 hours, calculated the proportion of time a toad spent on the contaminated side and compared it to a random side choice. We found evidence for the avoidance of the folpet formulation Folpan® 500 SC, the metrafenone formulation Vivando® and the glyphosate formulation Taifun® forte at maximum recommended field rates for vine and a trend for avoidance of Wettable Sulphur Stulln (sulphur). No avoidance was observed when testing Folpan® 80 WDG (folpet), Funguran® progress (copper hydroxide), SpinTorTM (spinosad), or 10% of the maximum field rate of any formulation tested. In the choice-tests in which we observed an avoidance, toads also showed higher activity on the contaminated side of the arena. As video analysis with tracking software is not always feasible, we further tested the effect of reducing the sampling interval for manual data analyses. We showed that one data point every 15 or 60 minutes results in a risk of overlooking a weak avoidance behavior, but still allows to verify the absence/presence of an avoidance for six out of seven formulations. Our findings are important for an upcoming pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and could be a template for future standardized tests.

Can environmental concentrations of glyphosate affect survival and cause malformation in amphibians? Effects from a glyphosate-based herbicide on Physalaemus cuvieri and P. gracilis (Anura: Leptodactylidae)

Herbicides are the most common agrochemicals used in crops. Among them, glyphosate is the most widely applied in the world. Herbicides, especially organophosphates, have been shown to be hazardous to non-target species, including amphibians. The present study evaluated the acute and chronic effects of glyphosate-based herbicide (GBH), Roundup original® DI on tadpoles from two South American native species, Physalaemus cuvieri and P. gracilis. Spawnings were collected in the natural environment and maintained in the laboratory under controlled conditions. Acute and chronic toxicology trials began at stage 25 of Gosner (Herpetological 16:183-190, 1960). In an acute toxicity assay, seven GBH concentrations between 100 and 4500 μg a.e./L were tested over 96 h. For the chronic trials, tadpoles were subjected to both doses allowed by Brazilian legislation and to concentrations found in natural environment waters from Brazil and Argentina, between 65 and 1000 μg a.e/L over 14 days. Glyphosate had lethal effects on both studied species. Tadpoles showed shorter lengths and lower masses; that is, those that survived suffered chronic effects on growth and weight. The GBH maximum acceptable toxicant concentration for mortality and malformation was lower than the allowed level for Brazilian waters. The GBH tested in this study presented a high environmental and acute risk for the two studied species.

Effects of glyphosate and its commercial formulation, Roundup® Ultramax, on liver histology of tadpoles of the neotropical frog, Leptodactylus latrans (amphibia: Anura)

In the last years, the agricultural expansion has led to an increased use of pesticides, with glyphosate as the most widely used worldwide. This is also the situation in Argentina, where glyphosate formulations are the most commercialized herbicides. It is known that glyphosate formulations are much more toxic than the active ingredient, and this difference in toxicity can be attributed to the adjuvants present in the formula. In this context, the aim of the present study was to evaluate and compare sub-lethal histological effects of the glyphosate formulation Roundup Ultramax and glyphosate active ingredient on Leptodactylus latrans tadpoles at Gosner-stage 36. Semi-static bioassays were performed using 96 h of exposure with Roundup Ultramax formulation (RU; 0.37-5.25 mg a.e./L), glyphosate (GLY; 3-300 mg/L), and a control group. RU exposure showed an increment in the melanomacrophagic cells (MMc) and melanomacrophagic centers (MMCs) from 0.37 mg a.e./L. GLY exposure showed a significant increment in the number of MMc from 15 mg/L, and of MMCs from 3 mg/L. Also, histopathological lesions were observed in the liver of tadpoles exposed to both, GLY and RU. These lesions included: lipidosis and hepatic congestion, but only RU showed significant differences respect to control, with a LOEC value of 2.22 mg a.e./L for both effects. In sum, this study represents the first evidence of adverse effects of glyphosate and RU formulation on the liver of anuran larvae at concentrations frequently found in the environment.

Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles

Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and reptiles by current risk assessments for other vertebrate groups was investigated. Available test methods and exposure models were reviewed with regard to their applicability to amphibians and reptiles. Proposals were made for specific protection goals aiming to protect important ecosystem services and taking into consideration the regulatory framework and existing protection goals for other vertebrates. Uncertainties, knowledge gaps and research needs were highlighted.

Scientific Opinion on the state of the science on pesticide risk assessment for amphibians and reptiles

Following a request from EFSA, the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues developed an opinion on the science to support the potential development of a risk assessment scheme of plant protection products for amphibians and reptiles. The coverage of the risk to amphibians and reptiles by current risk assessments for other vertebrate groups was investigated. Available test methods and exposure models were reviewed with regard to their applicability to amphibians and reptiles. Proposals were made for specific protection goals aiming to protect important ecosystem services and taking into consideration the regulatory framework and existing protection goals for other vertebrates. Uncertainties, knowledge gaps and research needs were highlighted.