An optimal combination of MCCB and CANTAB to assess functional capacity in older individuals with schizophrenia

Retention and impairment of neurocognitive functions in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease with a comprehensive neuropsychological test

AIM

MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery was developed by the National Institute of Mental Health to establish acceptance criteria for measuring cognitive changes in schizophrenia and can be used to assess cognitive functions in other psychiatric disorders. We used a Japanese version of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery to explore the changes in multiple cognitive functions in patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease.

METHODS

We administered the Japanese version of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery to 11 patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 11 patients with Alzheimer's disease, and 27 healthy controls. All Japanese versions of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery domain scores were converted to t-scores using sample means and standard deviations and were compared for significant performance differences among healthy control, MCI, and mild Alzheimer's disease groups.

RESULTS

Compared with healthy controls, patients with MCI and mild Alzheimer's disease demonstrated the same degree of impairment to processing speed, verbal learning, and visual learning. Reasoning and problem-solving showed significant impairments only in mild Alzheimer's disease. Verbal and visual abilities in working memory showed different performances in the MCI and mild Alzheimer's disease groups, with the Alzheimer's disease group demonstrating significantly more deficits in these domains. No significant difference was found among the groups in attention/vigilance and social cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

The Japanese version of MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery can be used to elucidate the characteristics of cognitive dysfunction of normal aging, MCI, and mild dementia in clinical practice.

Do cognition and other person-level characteristics determine housing outcomes among homeless-experienced adults with serious mental illness?

Objective: Many persons with serious mental illness (SMI) who have experienced homelessness struggle to sustain stable and independent housing. We know little about determinants of this population's housing status. This study aimed to identify person-level determinants of housing status among homeless-experienced veterans with SMI, focused primarily on cognition. Method: We administered cross-sectional surveys and detailed cognitive assessments on a convenience sample of homeless-experienced veterans with SMI (n = 90); we also reviewed these participants' medical records. We captured person-level potential predictors of housing status (demographics, cognition, diagnoses, symptoms, and service utilization) and 2 years of retrospective housing history. Participants' housing status was conceptualized as the setting (stable housing, other sheltered settings, and streets) they lived in for >50% of the past 2 years. We used the chi-square test and analysis of variance to determine how potential predictors differed by housing status. We used recursive partitioning to identify the combination of potential predictors and corresponding scores that best-differentiated participants by housing status. Results: No between-groups differences (p < .05) in cognition, symptoms, or other person-level factors were found among participants grouped by housing status. Recursive partitioning did not yield a stable model to predict housing status from the potential predictor variables. Conclusions and Implications for Practice: These data suggest that clinical interventions addressing studied person-level factors (e.g., cognitive rehabilitation) may not affect housing status for homeless-experienced veterans. As housing is highly influenced by social determinants of health, policies, and practices that affect contextual factors (e.g., affordable housing supply) may be more likely to improve housing status. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The Impact of Anticholinergic Burden on Functional Capacity in Persons With Schizophrenia Across the Adult Life Span

Anticholinergic burden (ACB) from medications impairs cognition in schizophrenia. Cognition is a predictor of functional capacity; however, little is known about ACB effect on functional capacity in this population. This study assesses the relationship between ACB and functional capacity across the life span in individuals with schizophrenia after controlling for ACB effect on cognition. A cross-sectional analysis was performed with data collected from 6 academic tertiary health centers. Two hundred and twenty-three community-dwelling participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were included in this study. Main variables were ACB, antipsychotic olanzapine equivalents, functional capacity, cognition, and negative symptoms. Simultaneous linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between ACB, functional capacity, and cognition and then between ACB and cognition. A mediation analysis was then performed to examine whether cognition mediated ACB effect on functional capacity if there was an association between ACB and cognition. Mean age of participants was 49.0 years (SD = 13.1, range 19-79), and 63.7% of participants had severe ACB, ie, a total score of 3 or above. Regression analyses revealed that ACB, age, education, and cognition independently predicted functional capacity and that ACB predicted cognition among those aged 55 years and older. Mediation analysis showed that cognition did partially mediate the effect of ACB on functional capacity in this older cohort. In conclusion, people with schizophrenia are exposed to severe ACB that can have a direct negative impact on functional capacity after controlling for its impact on cognition. Reducing ACB could improve functional capacity and potentially real-world function in schizophrenia.

Translation-Focused Approaches to GPCR Drug Discovery for Cognitive Impairments Associated with Schizophrenia

There are no effective therapeutics for cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia (CIAS), which includes deficits in executive functions (working memory and cognitive flexibility) and episodic memory. Compounds that have entered clinical trials are inadequate in terms of efficacy and/or tolerability, highlighting a clear translational bottleneck and a need for a cohesive preclinical drug development strategy. In this review we propose hippocampal-prefrontal-cortical (HPC-PFC) circuitry underlying CIAS-relevant cognitive processes across mammalian species as a target source to guide the translation-focused discovery and development of novel, procognitive agents. We highlight several G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) enriched within HPC-PFC circuitry as therapeutic targets of interest, including noncanonical approaches (biased agonism and allosteric modulation) to conventional clinical targets, such as dopamine and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, along with prospective novel targets, including the orphan receptors GPR52 and GPR139. We also describe the translational limitations of popular preclinical cognition tests and suggest touchscreen-based assays that probe cognitive functions reliant on HPC-PFC circuitry and reflect tests used in the clinic, as tests of greater translational relevance. Combining pharmacological and behavioral testing strategies based in HPC-PFC circuit function creates a cohesive, translation-focused approach to preclinical drug development that may improve the translational bottleneck currently hindering the development of treatments for CIAS.

A longitudinal comparison of two neurocognitive test batteries in patients with schizophrenia and healthy volunteers: Time effects on neuropsychological performance and their relation to functional outcome

Cognitive impairment is a major unmet need in the treatment of schizophrenia. Over the last decade, the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) has been used to assess the effects of novel treatments for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. However, other cognitive-neuroscience-based cognitive batteries, such as the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB) have been suggested as an alternative to the MCCB. Although both batteries purport to assess cognitive function in psychosis, no previous study has attempted to examine their validity longitudinally and the potential overlap between the two batteries over time. The aim of the current study was to assess the relationship between the MCCB and the CANTAB in the longitudinal assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. A sample of 39 stable schizophrenia outpatients and 18 controls completed the MCCB and the CANTAB battery at baseline, and at 2, 4 and 8-weeks follow-up. Correlation analyses and a mixed-model repeated measures approach were used. We found no significant effect of time in the MCCB. In contrast, for the CANTAB a significant effect of time consistent with practice effects for the attention domain in the control group and for the visual learning, reasoning and problem-solving, and social cognition domains in patients, with subjects performing better at follow-up. In particular, a significant time ∗ battery interaction was found for those cognitive domains. These findings suggest there are specific differences across cognitive tests to assess cognitive impairments in schizophrenia and that measures derived from the CANTAB appear to be more prone to practice effects in these patients.

Brain structure, cognition, and brain age in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and healthy controls

Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder (BD) may be disorders of accelerated aging. Direct comparison of healthy aging populations with schizophrenia and BD patients across the adult lifespan may help inform this theory. In total, 225 individuals (91 healthy controls, 81 schizophrenia, 53 euthymic BD) underwent 3T T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and cognitive testing. We analyzed associations among age, diagnosis, and cognition with cortical thickness and fractional anisotropy (FA) using general linear models. We then assessed "brain age" using a random forest algorithm, which was also assessed in an independent sample (n = 147). Participants with schizophrenia had lower cortical thickness and FA compared with the other two groups, most prominently in fronto-temporal circuitry. These brain changes were more evident in younger participants than in older ones, yet were associated with cognitive performance independent of diagnosis. Predicted age was 8 years greater than chronological age in individuals with schizophrenia in the first sample and 6 years greater in the second sample. Predicted and chronological age were not different in BD. Differences in brain circuitry are present from illness onset most prominently in schizophrenia and to a lesser extent in BD. These results support a non-progressive "early hit" hypothesis/etiology of illness in the major psychoses. Brain age differences support the hypothesized early aging mechanism in schizophrenia but not in BD.

Relationships among functional capacity, cognition, and naturalistic skill performance in people with serious mental illness

There has been increasing interest in understanding real-world outcomes for individuals with serious mental illnesses (SMI). This study examined domain-specific skill knowledge, functional capacity, and neurocognition as predictors of naturalistic grocery shopping skill performance in forty-eight individuals with SMI. Participants completed measures of skill knowledge and general functional capacity (UCSD Performance-Based Skill Assessment - brief) as well as measures of neurocognition and symptoms. The Test of Grocery-Shopping Skills (TOGSS) assessed naturalistic shopping. TOGSS was significantly correlated with functional capacity, shopping skill knowledge, and neurocognition, but not symptoms. Multiple regression analysis was conducted with variables entered in 2 blocks. Skill knowledge and functional capacity were entered in block 1. Neurocognitive measures were entered in block 2 using forward entry. Skill knowledge was not a significant predictor of TOGSS when accounting for functional capacity and neurocognition. Functional capacity predicted TOGSS over and above skill knowledge and remained significant after accounting for the effects of neurocognition. Our findings indicate that functional capacity was associated with skill assessment under naturalistic conditions. Further, there was some, but not complete, overlap between neurocognitive and functional capacity predictors of naturalistic skill performance. Further development of naturalistic assessments may hold promise for interventions targeting real-world function.

A systematic review of a functional assessment Tool: UCSD Performance-based skill assessment (UPSA)

Performance based assessment instruments have been employed in functional capacity measurement of mental disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to identify the psychometric properties of the UCSD Performance-based Skill Assessment (UPSA). A search was conducted using the PRISMA protocol and 'UPSA' as key word term on electronic databases, with a date range for articles published from 2001-2017. Published studies involving community-dwelling adults were included. Pharmacological and/or clinical interventions involving clinical outcomes and/or institutionalized samples were excluded. Data related to construct validity, test-retest reliability and sensitivity/specificity were extracted, summarized and analyzed according to UPSA versions and psychiatric disorders. Fifty-eight studies including 8782 Community-dwelling adults met selection criteria. Data supporting the construct and known-groups validity were extracted from 41 studies involving Schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders and 17 studies involving other metal illness. The UPSA was culturally adapted to 8 different languages and employed in 17 countries. Few studies reported sensitivity and specificity and the cut-off points could not be generalized. Moderate to strong evidence of construct validity and test-retest reliability was found. Few studies proposed cut-off points. The UPSA showed good psychometric properties in different versions including those culturally adapted.

Assessing the Relationship between Performance on the University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) and Outcomes in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the published literature to evaluate how functional capacity, as measured by the University of California at San Diego (UCSD) Performance-based Skills Assessment (UPSA), relates to other functional measures and real-world outcomes among individuals with schizophrenia.

METHODS

The MEDLINE® and Embase® databases were searched to identify joint evaluations with UPSA and key functional outcomes (functional scale measures; generic or disease-specific, health-related quality of life [HRQoL]; or real-world outcomes [residential status; employment status]) in patients with schizophrenia. Pearson correlations were estimated between UPSA scores, HRQoL, other functional scale measures, and real-world outcomes, for outcomes described in at least six studies.

RESULTS

The synthesis included 76 studies that provided 73 unique data sets. Quantitative assessment between the Specific Level of Function (SLOF) (n=18) scores and UPSA scores demonstrated a moderate borderline-significant correlation (0.45, p=0.06). Quantitative analysis of the relationship between the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) (n=11) and the Multidimensional Scale of Independent Functioning (MSIF) (n=6) scales revealed moderate and small nonsignificant Pearson correlations of -0.34 (p=0.31) and 0.12 (p=0.83), respectively. There was a small borderline-significant correlation between UPSA score and residential status (n=36; 0.31; p=0.08), while no correlation was found between UPSA score and employment status (n=19; 0.04; p=0.88).

CONCLUSION

The SLOF was the most often used functional measure and had the strongest observed correlation with the UPSA. Although knowledge gaps remain, evidence from this review indicates that there is a quantitative relationship between functional capacity and real-world outcomes in individuals with schizophrenia.