1
|
Benjamin WJ, Feng AL, Heft Neal M, Bellile E, Casper KA, Malloy KM, Rosko AJ, Stucken CL, Prince ME, Mierzwa ML, Taylor JMG, Eisbruch A, Spector ME, Wolf GT, Swiecicki PL, Worden FP, Chinn SB. Utility of bioselection with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in patients with T4 laryngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2024; 156:106917. [PMID: 38945011 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106917] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for induction selection of definitive treatment (IS) protocols have shown excellent outcomes for organ preservation and survival in patients with T3 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). We seek to evaluate survival and organ preservation outcomes in T4 LSCC patients treated with IS protocols. METHODS Retrospective cohort of advanced T3 and T4 LSCC patients who underwent IS protocols based upon potential for preserving a functional larynx. Patients received one neoadjuvant cycle of platinum-based chemotherapy with either 5-fluorouracil or docetaxel or with two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy with docetaxel and a Bcl-2 inhibitor. Patients who achieved ≥ 50 % response as determined by radiographic review and/or endoscopic evaluation received definitive chemoradiation. Patients who had < 50 % response after IS underwent total laryngectomy (TL) followed by post-operative radiation +/- chemotherapy. RESULTS Amongst T4 patients, 114 met inclusion criteria including 89 who underwent IS protocols and 25 who received an upfront TL. In total, 76.0 % of T3 patients and 71.9 % of T4 patients responded to IS and underwent definitive chemoradiation. There was no significant difference in hazard of death between T4 IS and T4 TL patients (HR: 0.9, p = 0.86). Among responders, there was no significant difference in 5-year laryngectomy-free survival (T3 - 59.6 %, T4 44.3 %, p = 0.15) or laryngeal preservation by T stage (T3 - 72.8 %, T4 - 73.0 %, p = 0.84). CONCLUSIONS Select T4 patients may benefit from organ preservation using IS protocols with similar response rates to patients with T3 tumors, without compromising survival when compared to upfront TL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William J Benjamin
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allen L Feng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Molly Heft Neal
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Emily Bellile
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Keith A Casper
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kelly M Malloy
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Andrew J Rosko
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Chaz L Stucken
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark E Prince
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michelle L Mierzwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; The Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jeremy M G Taylor
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; The Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Matthew E Spector
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Gregory T Wolf
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Paul L Swiecicki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; The Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Francis P Worden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; The Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven B Chinn
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; The Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Munjal M, Kaur R, Kaur R, Munjal S, Chopra P, Verma H, Chopra H. Therapeutic Modalities in Head-Neck Neoplasia and Prognostication: A Review. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 74:2445-2457. [PMID: 36452817 PMCID: PMC9702289 DOI: 10.1007/s12070-020-02200-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Accepted: 10/03/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Neoplasia of the head and the neck necessitates intervention, surgical or otherwise, as the site and stage of the pathology may dictate. The various therapeutic modalities employed and prognosis has been reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manish Munjal
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Ramanpreet Kaur
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Raminderjit Kaur
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Shubham Munjal
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Parth Chopra
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Hitesh Verma
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| | - Hemant Chopra
- Oto-Rhino-Laryngologology and Head Neck Services, Dayanand Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, Punjab India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Burbure N, Handorf E, Ridge JA, Bauman J, Liu JC, Giri A, Galloway TJ. Prognostic significance of human papillomavirus status and treatment modality in hypopharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 2021; 43:3042-3052. [PMID: 34165223 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of hypopharynx cancer is often extrapolated from larynx cancer. This report analyses treatment patterns and survival limited to hypopharynx cancer using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). METHODS There are 9314 patients diagnosed with hypopharynx cancer between 2004 and 2016. The association between treatment modality and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Five-year overall survival ranged from 45% for stage I to 21% for stage IVB. Treatment modality did not influence survival in stage I/II. For stage III/IV, chemoradiation and surgery + adjuvant therapy were equivalent. Surgery yielded improved survival for T4 disease. Human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive tumors were present in 21% and were associated with improved hazard ratio of death (0.60, p = <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS Survival is superior for T4 hypopharynx cancer managed with surgery, while treatment modality does not impact outcomes for other T-stages. HPV-positive tumors are associated with improved survival regardless of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Burbure
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Handorf
- Department of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John A Ridge
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jessica Bauman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey C Liu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anshu Giri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas J Galloway
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vander Poorten V, Meulemans J, Beitler JJ, Piazza C, Kowalski LP, Mäkitie AA, Paleri V, Rinaldo A, Robbins KT, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Sjögren EV, Strojan P, Takes RP, Ferlito A. Salvage surgery for residual or recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after (Chemo)radiotherapy: Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2711-2721. [PMID: 34059377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonsurgical primary treatment of early and advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, employing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, is considered a standard of care in many centers throughout the world. When patients have persistent or recurrent disease after non-surgical treatment, salvage surgery is frequently the only remaining potentially curative treatment. Depending on the extent of the residual/recurrent disease, different surgical salvage options are at the surgeon's disposal. In selected cases with limited local disease, salvage transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open partial laryngectomies can be employed to achieve cure while preserving laryngeal function. For more advanced cases total laryngectomy is necessary. Identifying situations with unacceptable results from surgical salvage may guide future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jeroen Meulemans
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Otolaryngology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luiz P Kowalski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki, University Hospital, FI-00029, HUS Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vinidh Paleri
- Head and Neck Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, The Institute of Cancer Research, Brompton Road, London, UK
| | | | - K Thomas Robbins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl E Silver
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Elisabeth V Sjögren
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Robert P Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mendenhall WM, Dagan R, Bryant CM, Fernandes RP. Radiation Oncology for Head and Neck Cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2019; 31:31-38. [DOI: 10.1016/j.coms.2018.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
6
|
Head and Neck Cancers. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
|
7
|
Chiesa Estomba CM, Betances Reinoso FA, Lorenzo Lorenzo AI, Fariña Conde JL, Araujo Nores J, Santidrian Hidalgo C. Functional outcomes of supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma treated by transoral laser microsurgery compared with horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy in patients younger and older than 65 years. ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA 2018; 36:450-458. [PMID: 28177327 PMCID: PMC5317123 DOI: 10.14639/0392-100x-864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2016] [Accepted: 06/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of supraglottic carcinoma remains a controversial issue. Five accepted surgical and non-surgical oncological treatments have been currently established: standard horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy (HSL), supraglottic CO2 laser microsurgery (TLM), transoral robotic surgery, radiotherapy alone and radiotherapy in combination with chemotherapy. Some studies have shown that complications of head and neck surgeries increase significantly in patients over 65 years compared to younger patients. We designed a retrospective analysis to assess the rate of complications and functional outcomes of patients treated by TLM and HSL in cases of T1-T3 supraglottic squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) in a tertiary University Hospital. Results were compared between patients younger and older than 65 years. We found significant differences in the rate of aspiration pneumonia (p = 0.026), mean time to decannulation (p = 0.001) and mean hospital stay (p = 0.007) in patients treated by TLM, which was higher and longer in the group of patients over 65 years of age. Regarding HPL, we only found significant differences in the mean time to decannulation (p = 0.001), which was longer in the group of patients younger than 65 years. According to our results, TLM or HPL can both be a safe surgical option for patients older than 65 years, but previous evaluation of lung function before surgery is mandatory because of an increased risk of aspiration pneumonia in patients with lung problems, especially when treated by TLM. Concerning functional outcomes in patients older than 65 years, TLM reduces the postoperative rate of tracheostomy, mean time required for decannulation and mean hospital stay compared with HPL. However, no significant difference in the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia, dysphagia or in the mean length of NGT feeding was found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Chiesa Estomba
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| | - F A Betances Reinoso
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| | - A I Lorenzo Lorenzo
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| | - J L Fariña Conde
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| | - J Araujo Nores
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| | - C Santidrian Hidalgo
- Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery Department, University Hospital of Vigo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Forastiere AA, Ismaila N, Lewin JS, Nathan CA, Adelstein DJ, Eisbruch A, Fass G, Fisher SG, Laurie SA, Le QT, O'Malley B, Mendenhall WM, Patel S, Pfister DG, Provenzano AF, Weber R, Weinstein GS, Wolf GT. Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:1143-1169. [PMID: 29172863 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.7385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To update the guideline recommendations on the use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Methods An Expert Panel updated the systematic review of the literature for the period from January 2005 to May 2017. Results The panel confirmed that the use of a larynx-preservation approach for appropriately selected patients does not compromise survival. No larynx-preservation approach offered a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy as indicated. Changes were supported for the use of endoscopic surgical resection in patients with limited disease (T1, T2) and for initial total laryngectomy in patients with T4a disease or with severe pretreatment laryngeal dysfunction. New recommendations for positron emission tomography imaging for the evaluation of regional nodes after treatment and best measures for evaluating voice and swallowing function were added. Recommendations Patients with T1, T2 laryngeal cancer should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx by using endoscopic resection or radiation therapy, with either leading to similar outcomes. For patients with locally advanced (T3, T4) disease, organ-preservation surgery, combined chemotherapy and radiation, or radiation alone offer the potential for larynx preservation without compromising overall survival. For selected patients with extensive T3 or large T4a lesions and/or poor pretreatment laryngeal function, better survival rates and quality of life may be achieved with total laryngectomy. Patients with clinically involved regional cervical nodes (N+) who have a complete clinical and radiologic imaging response after chemoradiation do not require elective neck dissection. All patients should undergo a pretreatment baseline assessment of voice and swallowing function and receive counseling with regard to the potential impact of treatment options on voice, swallowing, and quality of life. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene A Forastiere
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jan S Lewin
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Cherie Ann Nathan
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David J Adelstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gail Fass
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Susan G Fisher
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Scott A Laurie
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Bernard O'Malley
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Snehal Patel
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David G Pfister
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Anthony F Provenzano
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Randy Weber
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory S Weinstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory T Wolf
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Radiotherapy Alone or With Chemotherapy in the Management of Carcinoma of the Supraglottic Larynx: A 25-Year Community Hospital Experience. Am J Clin Oncol 2017; 41:894-897. [PMID: 28654571 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes for patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx at a community hospital and to compare our results with the literature. MATERIALS AND METHODS Treatment records of 46 patients with localized carcinoma of the supraglottic larynx treated from January 1987 through January 2012 were reviewed. Overall, 18 (39%) presented with stage I or II disease, whereas 28 (61%) presented with stage III to IV. In total, 30 patients (65%) were treated using hyperfractionation, whereas 16 (35%) received once-daily fractionation. Twelve patients (26%) received concurrent chemotherapy with weekly cisplatin. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess outcomes. RESULTS The median follow-up for the living patients was 6.7 years (range, 1.7 to 23.1 y). At 5 years, the local-regional control (LRC), ultimate LRC, laryngeal preservation, and overall survival (OS) rates were 70%, 82%, 65%, and 53%, respectively. At 5 years, disease-free survival and cause-specific survival rates were 75% and 76%, respectively. The 5-year OS rates by American Joint Committee on Cancer stage were as follows: I to II, 61%; III, 51%; and IV, 44%. For those receiving concurrent chemotherapy, there was no improvement in 5-year LRC (83% vs. 66%; P=0.4081) or OS (55% vs. 50%; P=0.7697). For those receiving hyperfractionation, there was no improvement in 5-year LRC (75% vs. 63%; P=0.3369) or OS (55% vs. 50%; P=0.4161). CONCLUSIONS Our outcomes are similar to those reported in the literature. Neither hyperfractionation nor chemotherapy appeared to confer a benefit for disease control or OS possibly owing to small sample size and the inherent bias of a retrospective review.
Collapse
|
10
|
Meulemans J, Delaere P, Nuyts S, Clement P, Hermans R, Vander Poorten V. Salvage Transoral Laser Microsurgery for Radiorecurrent Laryngeal Cancer: Indications, Limits, and Outcomes. CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS 2017; 5:83-91. [PMID: 28367362 PMCID: PMC5357496 DOI: 10.1007/s40136-017-0143-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review The aim of this report is to identify relevant literature reports on salvage transoral laser microsurgery (TLM); to consider its oncologic and functional outcomes, as well as reported complications; and to address indications and limitations of salvage TLM. Findings The weighted average of local control after first salvage TLM was 57%. Repeated TLM procedures for second or third recurrences were required in up to 41% of cases, resulting in a weighted average of local control with TLM alone of 67%. The rate of definite laryngeal preservation was 73%. The ultimate local control rate, including cases that required total laryngectomy, was 90%. The overall complication rate after salvage TLM was 14%. Summary Salvage TLM of radiorecurrent laryngeal cancer yields excellent oncologic outcomes. Serious complications are scarce, hospitalization times are short, and functional outcomes in terms of voice and swallowing are favorable when compared to open conservation laryngeal surgery. The key to success is an optimal patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Meulemans
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P. Delaere
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - S. Nuyts
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Section Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P.M. Clement
- Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - R. Hermans
- Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - V. Vander Poorten
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Laryngeal cancer remains one of the most common tumors of the respiratory tract. Fortunately, significant advancements have been made over the past decade in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Although surgery has been the historical mainstay for localized disease and still is an integral part of treatment, nonsurgical options like radiation and systemic therapy have emerged as viable options. In addition, in the metastatic setting, novel agents are showing promise for this patient population. The care for patients with laryngeal cancer continues to evolve and truly requires a multidisciplinary team-based approach. Unique morbidities, such as loss of natural voice, respiration, and airway protection during swallowing, are observed with this disease and require special consideration. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:31-50. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor E Steuer
- Assistant Professor, Department of Hematology Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Mark El-Deiry
- Associate Professor, Department of Otolaryngology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jason R Parks
- Resident, Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Kristin A Higgins
- Assistant Professor, Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Professor and Director of the Head and Neck Medical Oncology Program, Department of Hematology Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zumsteg ZS, Kim S, David JM, Yoshida EJ, Tighiouart M, Shiao SL, Scher K, Mita A, Sherman EJ, Lee NY, Ho AS. Impact of concomitant chemoradiation on survival for patients with T1-2N1 head and neck cancer. Cancer 2016; 123:1555-1565. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 11/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary S. Zumsteg
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Sungjin Kim
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - John M. David
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Emi J. Yoshida
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Mourad Tighiouart
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Stephen L. Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Kevin Scher
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Alain Mita
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| | - Eric J. Sherman
- Department of Medical Oncology; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York New York
| | - Nancy Y. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; New York New York
| | - Allen S. Ho
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
- Department of Surgery; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Djordjevic V, Bukurov B, Arsovic N, Dimitrijevic M, Jesic S, Nesic V, Petrovic Z. Prospective case-control study of efficacy of bilateral selective neck dissection in primary surgical treatment of supraglottic laryngeal cancers with clinically negative cervical findings (N0). Clin Otolaryngol 2016; 41:634-639. [DOI: 10.1111/coa.12570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- V. Djordjevic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - B. Bukurov
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - N. Arsovic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - M. Dimitrijevic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - S. Jesic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - V. Nesic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| | - Z. Petrovic
- Faculty of Medicine; University of Belgrade; Belgrade Serbia
- Clinic for Otorhinolaryngology and Maxillofacial Surgery; Clinical Center of Serbia; Belgrade Serbia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
To K, Qureishi A, Mortimore S, De M. The role of primary transoral laser microsurgery in laryngeal cancer: a retrospective study. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40:449-55. [DOI: 10.1111/coa.12397] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/12/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- K. To
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Royal Derby Hospital; Derby UK
| | - A. Qureishi
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Royal Derby Hospital; Derby UK
| | - S. Mortimore
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Royal Derby Hospital; Derby UK
| | - M. De
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Royal Derby Hospital; Derby UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Mendenhall WM, Strojan P, Eisbruch A, Smee R, Rinaldo A, Ferlito A. When is definitive radiotherapy the preferred treatment for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:2583-6. [PMID: 26024696 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3660-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
17
|
Glottic and supraglottic pT3 squamous cell carcinoma: outcomes with transoral laser microsurgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:1983-90. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3611-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2014] [Accepted: 03/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
18
|
Heaton CM, Al-Shwaiheen F, Liu CSJ, Yom SS, Ryan WR. Prognostic significance of hyoid bone invasion in advanced base of tongue carcinoma treated by chemoradiation. Clin Otolaryngol 2015; 40:260-5. [PMID: 25641627 DOI: 10.1111/coa.12367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/31/2014] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the prognostic influence of hyoid bone invasion in advanced base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed pre-treatment imaging (CT/MRI) for the presence or absence of hyoid bone invasion in patients with advanced (clinical T3 or T4a stage) base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma treated with chemoradiation from January 2001 to January 2011. We compared patients with hyoid bone invasion to those without based on the following metrics: 1-, 2- and 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, disease-specific survival and overall survival. RESULTS Eleven of thirty-seven patients had hyoid invasion present on pre-treatment imaging. Average follow-up was 45 months. Patients with hyoid bone invasion were found to have lower percentages in all survival metrics measured compared to patients without, respectively, with statistical significance achieved in the following: 2-year locoregional recurrence-free survival: 36.4% versus 86.4% (P = 0.006), 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival: 12.5% versus 63.6% (P = 0.05), 2-year disease-free survival: 36.4% versus 77.3% (P = 0.05), 5-year disease-free survival: 12.5% versus 63.3% (P = 0.05) and the Kaplan-Meier curve for locoregional recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0075). CONCLUSIONS Hyoid bone invasion by base of tongue squamous cell carcinoma may indicate a poorer prognosis despite treatment. Hyoid bone invasion may be a possible indication for intensification of treatment and/or may indicate a necessity for increasing the degree of post-treatment surveillance monitoring and imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Heaton
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - F Al-Shwaiheen
- School of Medicine, Graduate Program for Clinical Research, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - C-S J Liu
- Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - S S Yom
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - W R Ryan
- Division of Head and Neck Oncologic/Endocrine/Salivary Surgery, Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California - San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Taguchi T, Takahashi M, Nishimura G, Shiono O, Komatsu M, Sano D, Sakuma Y, Tanigaki Y, Kubota A, Taguri M, Hata M, Oridate N. Phase II study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 in patients with stage II (T2N0M0) squamous cell carcinoma of the Pharynx or Larynx. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2014; 44:1158-63. [PMID: 25267992 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyu154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goals of treatment for head and neck cancer are cure and organ-function preservation. For organ preservation, primary treatment via radiotherapy alone is thought to be insufficient for Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, oropharynx or hypopharynx. The objective of the present study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for patients with Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx or larynx for primary organ preservation. METHODS Previously untreated patients with Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx, oropharynx or hypopharynx received three courses of S-1 (40 or 50 mg twice a day; 2 weeks of administration followed by 1 week of rest every 3 weeks) during conventional radiotherapy (a single daily fraction of 1.8 Gy) to a total dose of 70.2 Gy. The primary endpoint was the local control rate at 3 years. RESULTS From August 2009 to October 2012, 37 patients were evaluated for the study. The overall response rate was 100%. The 3-year local control rate was 89.0% (95% confidence interval, 78.9-99.2%), and the 3-year overall survival rate was 97.2% (95% confidence interval, 91.8-100%). Mucositis and dermatitis in the radiation field were the most common acute adverse events observed. The rates of Grade 3 mucositis and dermatitis were 27 and 35%, respectively. No patients experienced Grade 4 acute adverse events. The treatment completion rate was 89.2%. CONCLUSION Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 was safe and effective in improving local control for Stage II squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx or larynx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahide Taguchi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Masahiro Takahashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Goshi Nishimura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Osamu Shiono
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Masanori Komatsu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Daisuke Sano
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Yasunori Sakuma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama
| | - Yuji Tanigaki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujisawa City Hospital, Kanagawa
| | - Akira Kubota
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama
| | - Masataka Taguri
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama
| | - Masaharu Hata
- Department of Radiology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Oridate
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hasegawa M, Maeda H, Deng Z, Kiyuna A, Ganaha A, Yamashita Y, Matayoshi S, Agena S, Toita T, Uehara T, Suzuki M. Prediction of concurrent chemoradiotherapy outcome in advanced oropharyngeal cancer. Int J Oncol 2014; 45:1017-26. [PMID: 24969413 PMCID: PMC4121413 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/02/2014] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate human papillomavirus (HPV) infection as a predictor of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) response and indicator of planned neck dissection (PND) for patients with advanced oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC; stage III/IV). Overall, 39 OPSCC patients (32 men, 7 women; median age 61 years, range 39–79 years) were enrolled. The primary lesion and whole neck were irradiated up to 50.4 Gy, and subsequently the primary site and metastatic lymph nodes were boosted with a further 16.2 Gy. Although several chemotherapy regimens were employed, 82.1% of OPSCC patients received the combination of nedaplatin and 5-fluorouracil. HPV-related OPSCC (16 cases) was defined as both HPV DNA-positive status by polymerase chain reaction and p16INK4a overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Patients with N2 and N3 disease received PND 2–3 months after CCRT completion. Compared to non-responders, CCRT responders showed significantly lower nodal stage (N0 to N2b) and HPV-positive status in univariate analysis. Patients with HPV-related OPSCC had longer time to treatment failure (TTF) than those with HPV-unrelated OPSCC (p=0.040). Three-year TTF was 81.3 and 47.8% in the HPV-related and HPV-unrelated groups, respectively. There were also significant differences in disease-free survival (DFS) between the two OPSCC patient groups (p=0.042). Three-year DFS was 93.8 and 66.7% in patients with HPV-related and HPV-unrelated OPSCC, respectively. Multivariate logistic analysis showed a lower risk of TTF event occurrence in HPV-related OPSCC (p=0.041) than in HPV-unrelated OPSCC. Thus, HPV testing in addition to nodal stage was useful for predicting CCRT response, especially in advanced OPSCC. Because patients who received PND showed moderate locoregional control, PND is an effective surgical procedure for controlling neck lesions in patients with advanced HPV-unrelated disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Hasegawa
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Maeda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Zeyi Deng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Asanori Kiyuna
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Akira Ganaha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Yukashi Yamashita
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Sen Matayoshi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Shinya Agena
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Takafumi Toita
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Takayuki Uehara
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| | - Mikio Suzuki
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa 903-0215, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Computed tomography-based tumour volume as a predictor of outcome in laryngeal cancer: Results of the phase 3 ARCON trial. Eur J Cancer 2014; 50:1112-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Revised: 12/10/2013] [Accepted: 12/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
22
|
Wachters JE, Schrijvers ML, Slagter-Menkema L, Mastik M, de Bock GH, Langendijk JA, Kluin PM, Schuuring E, van der Laan BFAM, van der Wal JE. Prognostic significance of HIF-1a, CA-IX, and OPN in T1-T2 laryngeal carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. Laryngoscope 2013; 123:2154-60. [PMID: 24167820 DOI: 10.1002/lary.23831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To examine the prognostic value of hypoxia inducible factor HIF-1a, CA-IX, and OPN on clinical outcome in patients with T1-T2 supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) treated with primarily radiotherapy (RT). STUDY DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. METHODS Tumor tissue sections of 60 patients with T1-T2 supraglottic LSCC treated with primarily radiotherapy were assessed immunohistochemically for expression of HIF-1a, CA-IX, and OPN. The relationship of protein expression and classical clinical parameters with clinical outcome was studied, using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. RESULTS Neither HIF-1a nor CA-IX was of prognostic significance toward local control or overall survival in T1-T2 supraglottic LSCC. Cox regression survival analysis showed no relation between HIF-1a or CA-IX expression and local control (HR [hazard ratio] 1.07, CI [95% confidence interval] 0.29-3.87; HR 0.34, CI 0.04-2.58). Furthermore, OPN expression was not associated with local control (HR 1.37, CI 0.45-4.17) and overall survival (HR 0.99, CI 0.44-2.21). Our earlier findings in T1-T2 glottic LSCC (Schrijvers et al., 2008) could not be confirmed. CONCLUSION The absence of prognostic significance for HIF-1a and CA-IX toward local control in supraglottic LSCC, unlike glottic LSCC, suggests that supraglottic LSCC might represent another biological entity.
Collapse
|
23
|
Arshad H, Jayaprakash V, Gupta V, Cohan DM, Ambujakshan D, Rigual NR, Singh AK, Hicks WL. Survival Differences between Organ Preservation Surgery and Definitive Radiotherapy in Early Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 150:237-44. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599813512783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective Single-modality treatment, either with organ preservation surgery (OPS) or definitive radiation (RT), is the treatment of choice for patients with early supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SGC). However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 techniques are lacking. This study compares the survival outcomes in early SGC patients treated with OPS versus RT. Study Design Secondary data analysis. Setting Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Subjects and Methods This study included adult patients with early-stage (T1N0, T2N0) SGC undergoing single-modality treatment with either OPS (with or without neck dissection [ND]) or RT between 1988 and 2008. Survival analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) between patients treated with OPS+ND, OPS alone, and RT. Results A total of 2631 T1/T2 N0 SGC patients were identified, of whom 167 (6%) were treated with OPS+ND, 186 (7%) with OPS only, and 2278 patients (87%) with definitive RT only. In stage I (T1N0) SGC patients, a significantly better 5-year DSS was noted for both OPS+ND (81% vs 68%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, P = .03) and OPS only (82% vs 68%, HR = 0.70, P = .05) when compared with definitive RT. For stage II (T2N0) patients, only OPS+ND resulted in a significantly better 5-year DSS (86% vs 60%, HR = 0.31, P < .001) when compared with patients treated with RT. Conclusions Patients with early SGC who underwent OPS+ND had better OS and DSS than patients undergoing RT alone. OPS+ND may be considered a viable and preferred treatment option in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Arshad
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Vijayvel Jayaprakash
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - David M. Cohan
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Dildeep Ambujakshan
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Nestor R. Rigual
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Wesley L. Hicks
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Pezier TF, Nixon IJ, Joshi A, Guerrero-Urbano T, Oakley R, Jeannon JP, Simo R. Factors predictive of outcome following primary total laryngectomy for advanced squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 271:2503-9. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2779-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2013] [Accepted: 10/11/2013] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
25
|
When is radiation therapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma not indicated? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 271:2849-50. [PMID: 24141519 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2772-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2013] [Accepted: 10/07/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
26
|
Canis M, Ihler F, Martin A, Wolff HA, Matthias C, Steiner W. Results of 226 patients with T3 laryngeal carcinoma after treatment with transoral laser microsurgery. Head Neck 2013; 36:652-9. [PMID: 23596018 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2012] [Revised: 01/09/2013] [Accepted: 04/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in treatment of pT3 laryngeal cancer. METHODS We conducted a retrospective case series study of 226 patients with pT3 glottic (n = 122; 54%) or supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma (n = 104; 46%). All patients were treated by TLM in combination with neck dissection (63%) and with postoperative radiotherapy (18%). Our main outcome measures were local control, organ preservation, functional outcome, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and disease-specific survival. RESULTS Median follow-up period was 57.8 months. The 5-year organ-preservation and local control rates for all patients were 87% and 71.4%, respectively. The 5-year overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival were 64.4%, 63.0%, and 83.3%, respectively. CONCLUSION Results are comparable to partial or total laryngectomy, while being superior to primary chemo(radio)therapy. TLM results in low morbidity, rapid recovery, and good function and can be a valid option for organ-preserving surgery of pT3 glottic and supraglottic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Canis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Göttingen, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Causes of death of patients with laryngeal cancer. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 271:425-34. [PMID: 23591796 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2478-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2013] [Accepted: 03/27/2013] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Despite remarkable advances in the care of patients with laryngeal cancer over the past several decades, including a growing awareness of therapeutic complications and attention to quality of life, little is known about the causes of mortality in this population. In addition to the laryngeal malignancy itself, acute and late or chronic treatment-associated causes, second primary cancers, intercurrent disease and psychosocial factors are all responsible for patient morbidity and mortality. We examine the current literature related to the causes of death in patients with laryngeal cancer, in the hope of guiding future interventions to improve the longevity and quality of life of individuals with this cancer.
Collapse
|
28
|
Organ preservation in T4a laryngeal cancer: is transoral laser microsurgery an option? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270:2719-27. [PMID: 23408021 PMCID: PMC3758515 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2382-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2012] [Accepted: 01/24/2013] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
The main objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in the treatment of T4a laryngeal cancer and to report the oncological and functional outcomes. This is a retrospective case-series study, held in a single-institute, academic tertiary referral center. Seventy-nine patients with previously untreated T4a glottic (n = 31, 39 %) or supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma (n = 48, 61 %) were included in this study. Five patients (6 %) were treated exclusively by TLM, 16 (20 %) had TLM and unilateral neck dissection, 27 (35 %) had TLM and bilateral neck dissection. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was additionally administered in 26 (33 %) cases following TLM and neck dissection, and in 5 (6 %) cases after TLM without neck dissection. The main outcome measures included organ preservation, local control, functional outcome, overall, recurrence-free, and disease-specific survival. The median follow-up period was 49 months, 5 year organ preservation rate and local control rate were 80.0 and 67.2 %, 5 year overall, recurrence-free and disease-specific survival were 55.8, 61.9 and 71.8 %. The 5 year overall survival rates were 62.5 % in pN0 cases and 57.2 % in cases with pN-positive neck disease. With respect to survival, these results are comparable to total laryngectomy, while being superior to primary (chemo)radiotherapy. TLM results in a low morbidity, rapid recovery and good function and can be a valid option for organ preserving surgery of pT4a glottic and supraglottic cancer.
Collapse
|
29
|
Canis M, Martin A, Ihler F, Wolff HA, Kron M, Matthias C, Steiner W. Results of transoral laser microsurgery for supraglottic carcinoma in 277 patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2013; 270:2315-26. [PMID: 23306348 PMCID: PMC3699705 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2327-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2012] [Accepted: 12/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the study was to evaluate the oncological and functional results of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in patients with supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Between June 1980 and December 2006, 277 patients with squamous cell supraglottic carcinoma of all stages were treated by primary carbon dioxide laser microsurgery. All treatments were performed with curative intention. The goal was the complete tumor removal with preservation of functionally important structures of the larynx. The administered treatment was exclusively TLM with or without selective or modified radical neck dissection in 215 cases (78 %); TLM with postoperative radiotherapy was performed in 62 cases (22 %). Data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method. The median follow-up was 65 months. We achieved a 5-year local control rate of 85 % for pT1/pT2, 82 % for pT3, and 76 % for pT4. The 5-year overall, recurrence-free and disease-specific survival rates for stages I and II were 76, 81, and 92 %, for stages III and IVa 59, 65, and 81 %, respectively. With respect to local control and survival, these results are comparable with the results achieved by conventional partial and total resection of the larynx, while being superior to primary (chemo)radiotherapy. Transoral laser microsurgery results in a low morbidity, rapid recovery, and superior function compared with standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Canis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37099 Göttingen, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Strojan P, Haigentz M, Bradford CR, Wolf GT, Hartl DM, Langendijk JA, Rinaldo A, Eisbruch A, Mendenhall WM, Forastiere AA, Takes RP, Ferlito A. Chemoradiotherapy vs. total laryngectomy for primary treatment of advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol 2012; 49:283-6. [PMID: 23219843 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2012.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2012] [Revised: 11/08/2012] [Accepted: 11/11/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
31
|
Mendenhall WM, Morris CG, Kirwan JM, Amdur RJ, Vaysberg M, Werning JW. Definitive radiation therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the pharyngeal wall. Pract Radiat Oncol 2012; 2:e113-e119. [PMID: 24674173 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2012.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2012] [Revised: 03/16/2012] [Accepted: 03/25/2012] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the results of definitive radiation therapy (RT) for squamous cell carcinoma of the pharyngeal wall. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1964 and 2009, 170 patients were treated with definitive RT; all living patients had a 1.7-year minimum follow-up. RESULTS The 5-year rates of local control and ultimate local control were the following: T1, 93% and 93%; T2, 84% and 91%; T3, 60% and 62%; and T4, 44% and 44%. Multivariate analysis revealed stage I-II tumors, female gender, and altered fractionation were associated with improved local-regional control. The 5-year cause-specific and overall survival rates were the following: I, 88% and 50%; II, 89% and 57%; III, 49% and 31%; IV, 35% and 21%; and overall, 50% and 31%, respectively. Fatal complications occurred in 9 patients (5%). CONCLUSIONS Local-regional control and survival are related to extent of disease and treatment technique. Although outcomes have improved in recent years, the morbidity of treatment is significant and a substantial proportion of patients die due to cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.
| | - Christopher G Morris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Jessica M Kirwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Robert J Amdur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Mikhail Vaysberg
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| | - John W Werning
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Chan CC, Chan YY, Tanweer F. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of tranexamic acid in tonsillectomy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2012; 270:735-48. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-012-2184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2012] [Accepted: 09/06/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
33
|
Smee RI, De-loyde KJ, Broadley K, Williams JR. Prognostic factors for supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma: Importance of the unfit patient. Head Neck 2012; 35:949-58. [PMID: 22730206 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2012] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to define prognostic factors for supraglottic laryngeal cancer that may influence management. METHODS This ethics-approved study captured information on patients who presented with supraglottic laryngeal cancer between 1967 and 2008. Endpoints were local/ultimate failure and cancer-specific survival (CSS). Analysis was performed using chi-square, Fisher exact test, and logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analysis were used to describe time-to-event data. RESULTS Three hundred sixty-nine patients were analyzed. Two hundred seventeen patients received radiotherapy, 30 were treated with surgery, and 122 were treated with radiotherapy and surgery. The 5-year ultimate local control and CSS rates were 79.5% and 62.8%. Treatment type was a univariate predictor for outcome; however, it was not an independent predictor for ultimate local control or CSS. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the fact that by documenting information it is possible to define prognostic factors. It also shows the importance of adjusting for clinical predictors such as patients being unfit for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert I Smee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Prince of Wales Cancer Centre, Level 2, High St, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Janssens GO, Rademakers SE, Terhaard CH, Doornaert PA, Bijl HP, van den Ende P, Chin A, Marres HA, de Bree R, van der Kogel AJ, Hoogsteen IJ, Bussink J, Span PN, Kaanders JH. Accelerated Radiotherapy With Carbogen and Nicotinamide for Laryngeal Cancer: Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol 2012; 30:1777-83. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.35.9315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the results from a randomized trial comparing accelerated radiotherapy (AR) with accelerated radiotherapy plus carbogen inhalation and nicotinamide (ARCON) in laryngeal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with cT2-4 squamous cell laryngeal cancer were randomly assigned to AR (68 Gy within 36 to 38 days) or ARCON. To limit the risk of laryngeal necrosis, ARCON patients received 64 Gy on the laryngeal cartilage. The primary end point was local control. Secondary end points were regional control, larynx preservation, toxicity, disease-free survival, and overall survival. In a translational side study, the hypoxia marker pimonidazole was used to assess the oxygenation status in tumor biopsies. Results From April 2001 to February 2008, 345 patients were accrued. After a median follow-up of 44 months, local tumor control rate at 5 years was 78% for AR versus 79% for ARCON (P = .80), with larynx preservation rates of 84% and 87%, respectively (P = .48). The 5-year regional control was significantly better with ARCON (93%) compared with AR (86%, P = .04). The improvement in regional control was specifically observed in patients with hypoxic tumors and not in patients with well-oxygenated tumors (100% v 55%, respectively; P = .01). AR and ARCON produced equal levels of toxicity. Conclusion Despite lack of benefit in local tumor control for advanced laryngeal cancers, a significant gain in regional control rate, with equal levels of toxicity, was observed in favor of ARCON. The poor regional control of patients with hypoxic tumors is specifically countered by ARCON treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geert O. Janssens
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Saskia E. Rademakers
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Chris H. Terhaard
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Patricia A. Doornaert
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Hendrik P. Bijl
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Piet van den Ende
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Alim Chin
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Henri A. Marres
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Remco de Bree
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Albert J. van der Kogel
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Ilse J. Hoogsteen
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Johannes Bussink
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Paul N. Span
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| | - Johannes H. Kaanders
- Geert O. Janssens, Saskia E. Rademakers, Henri A. Marres, Albert J. van der Kogel, Ilse J. Hoogsteen, Johannes Bussink, Paul N. Span, and Johannes H. Kaanders, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen; Chris H. Terhaard, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht; Patricia A. Doornaert and Remco de Bree, Vrije Universiteit University Medical Center, Amsterdam; Hendrik P. Bijl, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen; Piet van den Ende, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Ambrosch P, Fazel A. Functional organ preservation in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2012; 10:Doc02. [PMID: 22558052 PMCID: PMC3341579 DOI: 10.3205/cto000075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The principles of open versus laser microsurgical approaches for partial resections of the larynx are described, oncologic as well as functional results discussed and corresponding outcomes following primary radiotherapy are opposed. Over the last decade, the endoscopic partial resection of the larynx has developed to an accepted approach in the treatment of early glottic and supraglottic carcinomas thus leading to a remarkable decline in the use of open surgery. Comparing the various surgical approaches of laryngeal partial resections, the oncological outcome of the patients, as far as survival and organ preservation are concerned, are comparable, whereas functional results of the endoscopic procedures are superior with less morbidity. The surgical procedures put together, are all superior to radiotherapy concerning organ preservation. Transoral laser microsurgery has been used successfully for vocal cord carcinomas with impaired mobility or fixation of the vocal cord, supraglottic carcinomas with infiltration of the pre- and/or paraglottic space as well as for selected hypopharyngeal carcinomas. It has been well documented that laser microsurgery achieves good oncological as well as functional results with reasonable morbidity. However, patients with those tumours have been successfully treated by open partial resections of the larynx at medical centres with appropriate expertise. The initially enthusiastic assessment of study results concerning the efficacy of various protocols of chemoradiation with the intent of organ preservation for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas are judged more cautious, today, due to recent reports of rather high rates of late toxicity complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Ambrosch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Suárez C, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Hartl DM, Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Strojan P, Ferlito A. Laser surgery for early to moderately advanced glottic, supraglottic, and hypopharyngeal cancers. Head Neck 2011; 34:1028-35. [PMID: 21500310 DOI: 10.1002/hed.21766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Current practice standards for the treatment of early to moderately advanced laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer demand both achievement of cure and preservation of laryngeal structure and function to the greatest extent possible. The oncologic and functional results of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) for early glottic cancer appear to be comparable to those of radiotherapy, with a higher rate of laryngeal preservation and a lower cost. TLM for early and moderately advanced supraglottic and hypopharyngeal cancers offers similar results with regard to survival and local control to those obtained with open surgical approaches. In addition, functional results of TLM are superior to those of open approaches because tracheotomies are usually avoided, rehabilitation of swallowing is faster, and hospital stay is shorter. TLM, when applicable, has become the preferred modality for surgical treatment of most early to moderately advanced cancers of the larynx and selected tumors of the hypopharynx.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Suárez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vilaseca I, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Luis Blanch J. Transoral laser microsurgery for T3 laryngeal tumors: Prognostic factors. Head Neck 2010; 32:929-38. [PMID: 19953612 DOI: 10.1002/hed.21288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in T3 laryngeal carcinomas and to identify prognostic factors for survival and laryngeal preservation. METHODS This study aimed to provide a retrospective analysis of 147 consecutive patients, evaluating their overall survival, disease-specific survival, laryngectomy-free survival, and function preservation rate. RESULTS Five-year overall, disease-specific, and laryngectomy-free survivals were 53.1%, 70.2%, and 62.3%, respectively. Disease-specific survival differed between glottic and supraglottic tumors (86.3% vs 61.8%; p = .015). Function preservation was 65.5% in supraglottic and 49.1% in glottic tumors (p = .002). Disease-specific survival was not related to pre-epiglottic involvement, cord fixation, or focal cartilage infiltration (p > .05). Vocal cord fixation and cartilage infiltration were independent negative prognostic factors for organ preservation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.184; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.082-0.411; p = .000 and OR = 0.331; 95% CI = 0.139-0.789; p = .013, respectively). CONCLUSION Our conclusion is that TLM is a good alternative in a large number of T3 laryngeal tumors, with adequate survival and organ preservation rates above 60%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Vilaseca
- Department of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
[Occult metastases in patients with supraglottic larynx cancer]. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010; 56:117-20. [PMID: 20218115 DOI: 10.2298/aci0903117d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The treatment of patients with supraglottic laryngeal cancer still remains a controversal issue. The study comprised 193 patients with a supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma treated in the period 1986-2003. All patients had primary surgery. They all had clinically and ultrasonografically negative findings in the neck (N0). Bilateral selective neck dissection at the level II-III was performed in all patients at the time of primar surgery. Postoperative radiotherapy was given to all patients with verified occult metastases (60 Gy). The occult cervical node metastases were found in 18% (35/193). Ipsilateral occult metastases were more common (77%, 27/35), but both bilateral and contralateral spread was also seen (14%, 5/35 and 9%, 3/35, respectively). Only in two (1%) did metastases develop subsequently. The 5-years survival rate was 86%.
Collapse
|
39
|
Ganly I, Patel SG, Matsuo J, Singh B, Kraus DH, Boyle J, Wong RJ, Lee N, Pfister DG, Shaha AR, Shah JP. Predictors of outcome for advanced-stage supraglottic laryngeal cancer. Head Neck 2010; 31:1489-95. [PMID: 19408292 DOI: 10.1002/hed.21113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The objective of this study was to report our experience in the management of patients with advanced-stage supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma and to identify factors predictive of outcome. METHODS In total, 181 patients with advanced-stage supraglottic laryngeal carcinoma were treated at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center between 1984 and 1998. Sixty-nine (38%) patients were treated by surgery +/- postoperative radiotherapy (SRT), 93 (52%) by chemoradiotherapy (CTRT), and 19 (10%) by radiotherapy alone (RT). Survival outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Predictors of outcome were identified using multivariate analysis. RESULTS The-5 year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were 53% and 71%, respectively. Patients treated with SRT and CTRT had comparable outcomes. The main independent predictors of OS and DSS were age greater than 60 years and stage of the neck at presentation. CONCLUSION Regardless of index treatment, age over 60 years and clinical stage of the neck at presentation were the main independent predictors of OS and DSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Ganly
- Department of Surgery, Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mendenhall WM. Outcomes after surgery or definitive radiotherapy for hypopharyngeal cancer. Cancer 2009; 115:5620-2. [PMID: 19693965 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
41
|
Worden FP, Moyer J, Lee JS, Taylor JMG, Urba SG, Eisbruch A, Teknos TN, Chepeha DB, Prince ME, Hogikyan N, Lassig AAD, Emerick K, Mukherji S, Hadjiski L, Tsien CI, Miller TH, Wallace NE, Mason HL, Bradford CR, Wolf GT. Chemoselection as a strategy for organ preservation in patients with T4 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma with cartilage invasion. Laryngoscope 2009; 119:1510-7. [PMID: 19504552 DOI: 10.1002/lary.20294] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS High rates of overall survival (OS) and laryngeal preservation were achieved in two sequential phase II clinical trials in patients with stage III/IV laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients were treated with chemoradiation after a >50% primary tumor response to one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (IC). We analyzed outcomes for T4 patients with cartilage invasion from both studies. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective. METHODS Records from 36 patients with T4 SCC of the larynx with cartilage invasion alone (n = 16) or cartilage invasion and extralaryngeal spread (n = 20) were retrospectively reviewed. All were treated with one cycle of cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) [or carboplatin (AUC 6)] and 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days) (P+5FU). Those achieving >50% response at the primary tumor received chemoradiation (70 Gy; 35 fractions with concurrent cisplatin-100 mg/m(2) [carboplatin (AUC 6)] every 21 days for 3 cycles), followed by adjuvant P+5FU for complete histologic responders (CHR). Patients with <50% response after IC underwent total laryngectomy and postoperative radiation. RESULTS Twenty-nine of 36 patients (81%) had >50% response following IC. Of these, 27 received definitive chemoradiation, 23 (85%) obtained CHR, with 58% laryngeal preservation rate. The 3-year OS was 78%, and the disease-specific survival was 80% (median follow-up 69 months). Following chemoradiation, 8/11 (73%) patients with an intact larynx had >75% understandable speech, 6/36 (17%) were g-tube dependent and 6/36 (17%) were tracheostomy dependent. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that chemo-selection is a feasible organ preservation alternative to total laryngectomy for patients with T4 laryngeal SCC with cartilage invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis P Worden
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Johansen LV, Grau C, Overgaard J. Nodal control and surgical salvage after primary radiotherapy in 1782 patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2009; 43:486-94. [PMID: 15360054 DOI: 10.1080/02841860410034289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ultimate neck control after primary radiotherapy and surgical salvage in laryngeal and pharyngeal cancer patients. Some 1782 consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma were treated by radiotherapy. At presentation 26% of the patients had metastatic lymph nodes. A total of 298 primary or secondary nodal recurrences were seen, 159 were treated, and 53 (53/298 approximately 18%) were controlled. Isolated N-recurrence was fatal in 2.7% (36/1324) of the N0 patients. Univariate actuarial analysis of nodal control demonstrated that the region of origin, T-classification, T-size, N-classification, tumor stage, differentiation, hemoglobin, and radiation time were significant prognostic factors. In a Cox analysis the independent significant parameters were gender, region of origin, N-classification, and differentiation. The conclusions were that in patients with nodal recurrence a little over half were treated and of these a third of the nodal recurrences were controlled. Significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis were gender, region of origin, N-classification, and tumor differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Vendelbo Johansen
- Department of Experimental Clinical Oncology, ENT Department, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Holsinger FC, Kies MS, Diaz EM, Gillenwater AM, Lewin JS, Ginsberg LE, Glisson BS, Garden AS, Ark N, Lin HY, Lee JJ, El-Naggar AK, Ki Hong W, Shin DM, Khuri FR. Durable long-term remission with chemotherapy alone for stage II to IV laryngeal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27:1976-82. [PMID: 19289628 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2008.17.6396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE For patients with stage II to IV laryngeal cancer, radiation therapy (RT) either alone or with concurrent chemotherapy provides the highest rate of organ preservation but can be associated with functional impairment. Thus, we studied the use of induction chemotherapy with or without conservation laryngeal surgery (CLS). Our objectives were to study the sensitivity of laryngeal cancer to platinum-based chemotherapy alone and to highlight the efficacy of CLS in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Thirty-one previously untreated patients with laryngeal cancer (T2-4, N0-1, M0), who were resectable with CLS, were enrolled. Patients received three to four cycles of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (TIP) chemotherapy, and response was assessed histologically. Patients with partial response (PR) proceeded to CLS. Patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR) received an additional three cycles of TIP and no other treatment. RESULTS Thirty patients were assessable for response. With TIP chemotherapy alone, 11 patients (37%) achieved pCR, 10 of whom (33%) remain alive with durable disease remission and no evidence of recurrence over a median follow-up time of 5 years. Nineteen patients (63%) treated with TIP alone achieved PR. The overall laryngeal preservation (LP) rate was 83%, and only five patients (16%) required postoperative RT. No patient required a gastrostomy tube or tracheotomy. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy alone in selected patients with T2-4, N0-1 laryngeal cancer can provide durable disease remission at 5 years. For patients with PR, CLS provides a high rate of LP. This prospective study suggests that chemotherapy alone may cure selected patients with laryngeal cancer, warranting further prospective investigation.
Collapse
|
44
|
Knab BR, Salama JK, Solanki A, Stenson KM, Cohen EE, Witt ME, Haraf DJ, Vokes EE. Functional organ preservation with definitive chemoradiotherapy for T4 laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol 2008; 19:1650-4. [PMID: 18467314 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdn173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Randomized trials established chemoradiotherapy as standard treatment for advanced laryngeal cancer. Patients with large-volume T4 disease (LVT4) were excluded from these trials. The purpose of this study was to report T4 laryngeal cancer patient outcome, including those with LVT4 disease, treated with chemoradiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study is a retrospective subset analysis of 32 patients with T4 laryngeal carcinoma including LVT4 tumors treated on three consecutive protocols investigating paclitaxel (Taxol), 5-fluorouracil, hydroxyurea, and 1.5-Gy twice daily (BID) radiotherapy (TFHX). RESULTS Median follow-up is 43 months. Four-year locoregional control (LRC), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) was 71%, 67%, 53%, and 86%, respectively. Four patients required laryngectomy for recurrent or persistent disease. Of disease-free patients with >or=1 year follow-up, 90% demonstrated normal or understandable speech. None required laryngectomy for complications. Among LVT4 patients, 4-year LRC, DFS, OS, and LFS was 71%, 65%, 56%, and 81%, respectively. Induction chemotherapy improved 4-year LRC (90% versus 46%, P = 0.03) and DFS (84% versus 42%, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS Promising control and functional outcomes are achieved with TFHX for T4 laryngeal patients. LVT4 disease had outcomes similar to patients with less advanced disease treated on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 91-11. Induction chemotherapy improved outcomes, warranting further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Knab
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, 5758 South Maryland Avenue, MC 9006, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rodrigo JP, Suárez C, Silver CE, Rinaldo A, Ambrosch P, Fagan JJ, Genden EM, Ferlito A. Transoral laser surgery for supraglottic cancer. Head Neck 2008; 30:658-66. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.20811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
|
46
|
Cooper JS. Cancer of the Larynx and Hypopharynx. Radiat Oncol 2008. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77385-6_5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
47
|
Mendenhall WM, Mancuso AA, Hinerman RW, Malyapa RS, Werning JW, Amdur RJ, Villaret DB. Multidisciplinary Management of Laryngeal Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69:S12-4. [PMID: 17848278 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.05.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2007] [Accepted: 04/24/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The management of head and neck cancer has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach in which patients are evaluated before treatment and decisions depend on prospective multi-institutional trials, as well as retrospective outcome studies. The choice of one or more modalities to use in a given case varies with the tumor site and extent, as exemplified in the treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas. The goals of treatment include cure, laryngeal voice preservation, voice quality, optimal swallowing, and minimal xerostomia. Treatment options include transoral laser excision, radiotherapy (both definitive and postoperative), open partial laryngectomy, total laryngectomy, and neck dissection. The likelihood of local control and preservation of laryngeal function is related to tumor volume. Patients who have a relatively high risk of local recurrence undergo follow-up computed tomography scans every 3-4 months for the first 2 years after radiotherapy. Patients with suspicious findings on computed tomography might benefit from fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to differentiate post-radiotherapy changes from tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William M Mendenhall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL 32610-0385, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Foote RL. Radiotherapy Alone for Early-Stage Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Larynx and Hypopharynx. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69:S31-6. [PMID: 17848288 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.04.092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2007] [Accepted: 04/22/2007] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe and illustrate examples of early-stage larynx and hypopharynx cancer that can be successfully treated with radiotherapy alone. METHODS AND MATERIALS Review of the NCCN and ASCO practice guidelines. Representative examples are included. RESULTS Early-stage larynx and hypopharynx cancer is defined by tumor extent based on physical and imaging examination. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy alone is appropriate treatment for properly selected early-stage squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx and hypopharynx. The NCCN and ASCO practice guidelines can be an aid to the clinician in identifying favorable cancers that can be successfully treated with radiotherapy alone with preservation of organ function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L Foote
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Sevilla MA, Rodrigo JP, Llorente JL, Cabanillas R, López F, Suárez C. Supraglottic laryngectomy: analysis of 267 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 265:11-6. [PMID: 17684753 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0415-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2007] [Accepted: 07/25/2007] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Horizontal supraglottic laryngectomy (HSL) allows the preservation of a functioning larynx and avoids permanent tracheotomy. In this retrospective study we report our experience with HSL and describe the functional and oncological results of the procedure. A total of 267 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the supraglottis underwent a supraglottic laryngectomy at our Department from January 1978 to May 2002. The main outcome measures were: local and regional control, disease-specific survival and laryngeal preservation rate. The overall recurrence rate was 29% (78/267). The local recurrence rate was 8% (22 patients) and the regional recurrence rate was 17% (45 patients). The 5-year disease-specific survival rate was 73%. The 5-year laryngeal preservation rate was 82%. Multivariate analysis showed two parameters that were independent predictors of a reduced disease specific survival: cervical lymph node metastases of class N3 (P = 0.0003) and primary tumour classified as T4 (P = 0.004). HSL provided, in our experience, an optimal locoregional oncological control for laryngeal preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Agustina Sevilla
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, and Instituto Universitario de Oncología del Principado de Asturias, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Ambrosch P. The role of laser microsurgery in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2007; 15:82-8. [PMID: 17413407 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0b013e3280147336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Transoral laser microsurgery has developed in recent years into a surgical method that combines a minimally invasive approach with the surgical precision of laser and microscope. The outcomes of laser microsurgical treatment of laryngeal carcinomas are reviewed and compared with the results of competitive standard procedures. RECENT FINDINGS Laser microsurgery is widely acknowledged to have advantages in the treatment of early glottic carcinoma. In the treatment of glottic carcinoma causing impaired mobility or fixation of the vocal cord the role of laser surgery has not yet been definitively assessed. Based on published results, primary laser therapy can achieve local tumor control with a functional residual larynx in approximately 70-80% of cases. In patients with early or moderately advanced supraglottic carcinoma, laser microsurgery is comparable to open supraglottic laryngectomy in terms of local control and survival. With regard to organ preservation, laser microsurgery is comparable to open supraglottic laryngectomy but superior to radiotherapy. Microsurgery can preserve functionally important structures, allowing for early swallowing rehabilitation while avoiding tracheotomy. SUMMARY This review elucidates the role of laser microsurgical partial resections of the larynx in comparison with other treatment modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Ambrosch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|