1
|
Belfiore MP, Nardone V, D’Onofrio I, Pirozzi M, Sandomenico F, Farese S, De Chiara M, Balbo C, Cappabianca S, Fasano M. Recurrent Versus Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer: An Evolving Landscape and the Role of Immunotherapy. Biomedicines 2024; 12:2080. [PMID: 39335592 PMCID: PMC11428618 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is among the ten most common cancers worldwide, with advanced SCCHN presenting with a 5-year survival of 34% in the case of nodal involvement and 8% in the case of metastatic disease. Disease-free survival at 2 years is 67% for stage II and 33% for stage III tumors, whereas 12-30% of patients undergo distant failures after curative treatment. Previous treatments often hinder the success of salvage surgery and/or reirradiation, while the standard of care for the majority of metastatic SCCHN remains palliative chemo- and immuno-therapy, with few patients eligible for locoregional treatments. The aim of this paper is to review the characteristics of recurrent SCCHN, based on different recurrence sites, and metastatic disease; we will also explore the possibilities not only of salvage surgery and reirradiation but also systemic therapy choices and locoregional treatment for metastatic SCCHN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Paola Belfiore
- Diagnostic of Imaging, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University ”L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.N.); (I.D.); (M.D.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Valerio Nardone
- Diagnostic of Imaging, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University ”L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.N.); (I.D.); (M.D.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Ida D’Onofrio
- Diagnostic of Imaging, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University ”L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.N.); (I.D.); (M.D.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Mario Pirozzi
- SCDU Oncologia, “Maggiore della Carità” University Hospital, 28100 Novara, Italy;
| | - Fabio Sandomenico
- Radiology Unit, Buon Consiglio Fatebenefratelli Hospital, 80123 Naples, Italy;
| | - Stefano Farese
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University “L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.F.)
| | - Marco De Chiara
- Diagnostic of Imaging, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University ”L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.N.); (I.D.); (M.D.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Ciro Balbo
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University “L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.F.)
| | - Salvatore Cappabianca
- Diagnostic of Imaging, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University ”L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (V.N.); (I.D.); (M.D.C.); (S.C.)
| | - Morena Fasano
- Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Campania University “L.Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (S.F.); (C.B.); (M.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Russo E, Costantino A, Veneroni MV, Festa BM, Pellini R, Campo F, Petruzzi G, Spriano G, Mercante G, De Virgilio A. Transoral Laser Microsurgery in Recurrent Laryngeal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Laryngoscope 2022; 133:1425-1433. [PMID: 37158265 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the oncological outcomes of salvage transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) in the treatment of patients suffering from recurrent laryngeal cancer. METHODS PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Scopus databases were searched. English language, original studies investigating oncological outcomes of TLM in adult patients with recurrent laryngeal cancer were included. Data were pooled using a distribution-free approach for estimating summary local control (LC), disease-specific survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) curves with random effects. RESULTS Two hundred and thirty-five patients underwent salvage TLM after primary (chemo)radiotherapy. The mean follow-up time was 60.8 months (95% CI: 32.7-88.9). Estimated pooled LC rates (95% CI) at 1, 3 and 5 years were 74.2% (61.7-89.4), 53.9% (38.5-75.3), and 39.1% (25.2-60.8). Estimated pooled DSS rates (95% CI) at 1, 3 and 5 years were 88.4% (82.0-95.3), 67.8% (50.9-90.3), and 58.9% (42.7-81.1). Two hundred and seventy-one patients underwent TLM after primary laser treatment. The mean follow-up time was 70.9 months (95% CI: 36.9-104.9). Estimated pooled LC rates (95% CI) at 1, 3 and 5 years were 72.2% (64.7-80.6), 53.2% (42.2-66.9), and 40.4% (29.6-55.2). Estimated pooled DSS rates (95% CI) at 1, 3 and 5 years were 92.1% (85.5-99.1), 77.0% (64.4-92.0), and 67.1% (51.6-87.3). CONCLUSIONS TLM is a valuable treatment option for the management of locally recurrent laryngeal carcinoma if performed by experienced surgeons and following rigorous patients' selection criteria. Further studies should be conducted to define stage-based clinical guidelines. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA Laryngoscope, 133:1425-1433, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Russo
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| | - Andrea Costantino
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| | | | - Bianca Maria Festa
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| | - Raul Pellini
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome Italy
| | - Flaminia Campo
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome Italy
| | - Gerardo Petruzzi
- Department of Otolaryngology‐Head & Neck Surgery IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute Rome Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mercante
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences Humanitas University Pieve Emanuele Italy
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Rozzano Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang CC, Lin WJ, Wang JJ, Chen CC, Liang KL, Huang YJ. Transoral Robotic Surgery for Early-T Stage Glottic Cancer Involving the Anterior Commissure—News and Update. Front Oncol 2022; 12:755400. [PMID: 35174080 PMCID: PMC8841867 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.755400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background About 20% of all glottic carcinomas involve the anterior commissure (AC), and AC involvement was deemed to be a risk factor of local recurrence and poor prognosis. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has been developed for a panoramic view of the AC and en-bloc resection of the tumor by multidirectional dissection with endo-wristed instruments. With satisfactory preliminary results, we would like to update the data with a bigger cohort and present the news on using TORS for salvage treatment of recurrence from irradiation failure. Methods From July 2010 to December 2019, 22 patients with early T1 and 2 stage primary (n = 11) or recurrent (n = 11) glottic cancer with AC involvement received TORS without adjuvant therapy. TORS exposure was found to be better than TLM by conventional laryngoscopy in diagnostic biopsy. Seven of the 22 patients had recurrent cancer from irradiation failure. The perioperative factors that may be associated with survival were retrospectively analyzed, and the 5-year overall survival (OS)/disease-specific survival (DSS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS)/and organ preservation survival (OPS) rate were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier Method. Their voice and swallowing functions were evaluated by questionnaires of Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10) and Functional Outcome Swallowing Scale (FOSS). Results All 22 TORSs were completed smoothly. After a mean follow-up of 49 ± 35.9 months, the Kaplan–Meier method estimated 5-year OS/DSS/RFS/OPS was 93.8%, 93.8%, 74.6%, and 86.3%, respectively. Our 11 patients with fresh cancer had 100% recurrence-free survival. Although the recurrent rate was higher in patients with history of RT, they could be rescued by further open laryngectomy without compromising the OS and DSS. Only one patient expired. The other 21 patients had satisfactory swallowing function with FOSS of 0.33 ± 0.66. Five patients depended on tracheostomy, but the rest 17 patients had serviceable voice with VHI-10 of 18.41 ± 11.29. Conclusions TORS could be used in the primary or salvage management of glottic cancer with AC involvement while TORS was confirmed to have better exposure to TLM. The RFS was good for patients with primary cancer. In patients having irradiation failure, TORS could also be a minimally invasive transoral approach before trying open surgery to preserve the organ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen-Chi Wang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan
- *Correspondence: Chen-Chi Wang,
| | - Wen-Jiun Lin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Jie Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Chih Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- Ph.D. Program in Translational Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Li Liang
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Jung Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laryngectomy-free survival after salvage partial laryngectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2022; 279:3021-3027. [PMID: 35039895 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07257-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) is widely used for early glottic cancer. Patients failing this treatment are referred to surgical management of their disease. Salvage partial laryngectomy (SPL) has the advantage of preserving laryngeal function with total laryngectomy (TL) remaining as a last resort. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of SPL in preventing total laryngectomy, following failed RT, for early glottic cancer. METHODS A meta-analysis of all published English literature was performed. All publications that included patients undergoing SPL were reviewed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The search strategy identified 154 relevant articles. A total of 15 retrospective studies that included 323 suitable patients were subsequently analyzed in this meta-analysis. The main outcome measure was the rate of laryngectomy-free survival (LFS) following SPL. The indications for salvage TL (i.e., disease recurrence and poorly functional larynxes) as well as subgroup analyses for open and trans-oral SPLs were also calculated. RESULTS The overall rate of LFS following SPL was 81.2% (fixed effects model range: 75.7-86.8%). Salvage TL following SPL were performed in 96.8% due to disease recurrence and in 3.2% to poorly functional larynxes. A subgroup analysis showed a 90.4% LFS after open SPL and 78.6% following trans-oral SPL. CONCLUSION A high rate of successful salvage partial laryngectomies, regardless of surgical technique, is to be anticipated in well-selected patients after RT failure.
Collapse
|
5
|
Miśkiewicz-Orczyk K, Ścierski W, Lisowska G, Zięba N, Misiołek M. Factors Associated with Outcomes Following Salvage Surgery for Recurrent Laryngeal Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 50 Cases from a Single Center in Poland. Med Sci Monit 2021; 27:e932004. [PMID: 34535622 PMCID: PMC8456775 DOI: 10.12659/msm.932004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective study from a single center in Poland aimed to identify factors associated with outcomes following salvage surgery in 50 patients with recurrent laryngeal cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study group consisted of 50 patients with recurrent laryngeal cancer after primary organ preservation treatment (12 patients after partial surgery, 30 patients after radiation therapy, and 8 patients after prior treatment using both methods). None of the patients received chemotherapy before salvage surgery. All patients with recurrence of laryngeal cancer underwent total laryngectomy with elective bilateral nodal surgery. Local and/or nodal recurrence was considered the failure of primary organ preservation treatment. Efficacy of treatment was assessed in relation to overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local control (LC), and locoregional control (LRC). RESULTS Treatment results showed a poor prognosis in patients with local and/or nodal recurrence of laryngeal cancer. In the study group, the updated 5-year rates were as follows: OS rate of 26%; DFS rate of 25%; LC rate of 44%; and LRC rate of 39%. Univariate analysis showed that the stage before primary treatment was a predictive factor of OS (P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS The findings from this retrospective study of 50 patients with recurrent laryngeal carcinoma showed that salvage surgery following organ preservation treatment resulted in a 5-year OS rate of 26%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Miśkiewicz-Orczyk
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Wojciech Ścierski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Grażyna Lisowska
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Natalia Zięba
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Maciej Misiołek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Laryngological Oncology in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Zabrze, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vander Poorten V, Meulemans J, Beitler JJ, Piazza C, Kowalski LP, Mäkitie AA, Paleri V, Rinaldo A, Robbins KT, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Sjögren EV, Strojan P, Takes RP, Ferlito A. Salvage surgery for residual or recurrent laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma after (Chemo)radiotherapy: Oncological outcomes and prognostic factors. Eur J Surg Oncol 2021; 47:2711-2721. [PMID: 34059377 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Nonsurgical primary treatment of early and advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, employing radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy, is considered a standard of care in many centers throughout the world. When patients have persistent or recurrent disease after non-surgical treatment, salvage surgery is frequently the only remaining potentially curative treatment. Depending on the extent of the residual/recurrent disease, different surgical salvage options are at the surgeon's disposal. In selected cases with limited local disease, salvage transoral laser microsurgery, transoral robotic surgery and open partial laryngectomies can be employed to achieve cure while preserving laryngeal function. For more advanced cases total laryngectomy is necessary. Identifying situations with unacceptable results from surgical salvage may guide future therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jeroen Meulemans
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonathan J Beitler
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Otolaryngology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Brescia, ASST-Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luiz P Kowalski
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki, University Hospital, FI-00029, HUS Helsinki, Finland
| | - Vinidh Paleri
- Head and Neck Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Fulham Road, The Institute of Cancer Research, Brompton Road, London, UK
| | | | - K Thomas Robbins
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl E Silver
- Department of Surgery, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Elisabeth V Sjögren
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Robert P Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sievert M, Goncalves M, Binder B, Mueller SK, Rupp R, Koch M, Dürr S, Traxdorf M, Hecht M, Iro H, Gostian AO. Salvage laryngectomy after primary radio- and radiochemotherapy : A retrospective study. HNO 2021; 69:47-52. [PMID: 34019140 PMCID: PMC8397647 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01030-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Recurrent and residual laryngeal cancer after organ-preserving radio- or radiochemotherapy is associated with a poor prognosis. Salvage surgery is the most important therapeutic option in these cases. Objective The study assessed rates of recurrence and residual tumor as well as survival and complication rates after salvage laryngectomy at the authors’ academic cancer center. Materials and methods A retrospective examination of all patients receiving laryngectomy between 2001 and 2019 due to tumor residuals or recurrence after primary radio- and radiochemotherapy was conducted. Results A total of 33 salvage procedures were performed. Defect reconstruction was performed by free flap surgery in 30.3% (n = 10) and regional flap surgery in 15.2% (n = 5) . One patient received regional flap surgery and free flap surgery simultaneously. Overall survival after 1, 2, and 5 years was 68.7, 47.9, and 24.2%, and disease-free survival was 81.6, 47.8, and 24.2%, respectively, with 48.5% (n = 16) postoperative tumor recurrences overall. Disease-free survival was significantly shorter for tumor extension into or onto the hypopharynx (p = 0.041). Postoperatively, 72.7% of patients developed a pharyngocutaneous fistula, of which 24.2% required surgical treatment. The hospital stay was 28.0 ± 16.1 days. Conclusion Salvage laryngectomy is associated with a high rate of treatable complications and high morbidity. Nevertheless, considering the advanced tumor stages treated, it allows for respectable oncological results. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00106-021-01030-3) includes the patient cohort. Article and supplementary material are available at www.springermedizin.de. Please enter the title of the article in the search field, the supplementary material can be found under “Ergänzende Inhalte”. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Sievert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - Miguel Goncalves
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Benedicta Binder
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sarina K Mueller
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Robin Rupp
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Michael Koch
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Dürr
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Maximilian Traxdorf
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Markus Hecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Heinrich Iro
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Antoniu-Oreste Gostian
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Functional and oncological outcomes of salvage transoral robotic surgery: a comparative study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:457-466. [PMID: 33880636 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06812-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) as a first-line therapy has been well-documented but evidence is missing regarding salvage therapy. The aim of this study is to compare the oncological and functional outcomes of TORS as a primary and salvage therapy. METHODS This retrospective monocentric study included 74 patients operated by a single surgeon and sorted out into two groups: primary treatment (PT) or Salvage treatment (ST) in case of previous history of radiation therapy. Patients were further stratified by tumour location: larynx and pharynx (lST vs lPT and pST vs pPT). RESULTS Forty-eight patients were included in PT group (64.9%) and 26 in ST group (35.1%). ST patients had more frequent cTis/T1 tumours (57.7% vs 29.2%, p = 0.0164) and no clinical lymph disease (3.8% vs 37.5%, p = 0.0016). Tracheostomy was more often performed in the ST group (57.7% vs 16.7%, p = 0.0003) and the lST subgroup (88.9% vs 9.1%, p < 0.0001). Gastric feeding tube placement was more frequent in the ST group (76.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0003), the pST subgroup (64.7% vs 15.4%, p = 0.0009) and the lST subgroup (100% vs 54.5%, p = 0.0297). We observed a trend for more postoperative complications in the ST group (69.2% vs 47.9%, p = 0.0783). The overall survival was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0004), and in the pST subgroup (p < 0.0001). The disease-free survival rate was lower in the ST group (p = 0.0001), the pST subgroup (p = 0.0002) and the lST subgroup (p = 0.0328). CONCLUSION This study confirms that survival and functional outcomes after salvage TORS are worse than in first line surgery.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sievert M, Goncalves M, Binder B, Mueller SK, Rupp R, Koch M, Dürr S, Traxdorf M, Hecht M, Iro H, Gostian AO. [Salvage laryngectomy after primary radio- and radiochemotherapy : A retrospective study. German version]. HNO 2021; 70:44-50. [PMID: 33837444 PMCID: PMC8760217 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-021-01029-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Das rezidivierende und residuelle Larynxkarzinom nach organerhaltender Radio- bzw. Radiochemotherapie ist mit einer schlechten Prognose verbunden. Die Salvage-Operation stellt in diesen Fällen die wichtigste therapeutische Option dar. Ziel der Arbeit Erfasst wurden die Rate an Rezidiv- und Residualtumoren sowie die Überlebensraten und die Komplikationsrate nach Salvage-Chirurgie des Kehlkopfs an dem akademischen Tumorzentrum der Autor(inn)en. Material und Methoden Retrospektiv wurden alle Patienten untersucht, bei denen zwischen 2001 und 2019 eine Salvage-Operation aufgrund eines Tumorresiduums oder Rezidivs nach primärer nichtchirurgischer Therapie erfolgt war. Ergebnisse Es wurden 33 Salvage-Operationen durchgeführt. Die Defektrekonstruktion erfolgte in 30,3 % der Fälle (n = 10) mittels freier und in 15,2 % (n = 5) mittels regionaler Lappenplastik. Ein Patient hat sowohl eine freie als auch gleichzeitig eine gestielte Lappenplastik erhalten. Das Gesamtüberleben nach einem, 2 und 5 Jahren betrug 68,7 %; 47,9 % bzw. 24,2 %, das krankheitsfreie Überleben 81,6 %; 47,8 % bzw. 24,2 % bei insgesamt 48,5 % (n = 16) postoperativen Tumorrezidiven. Das krankheitsfreie Überleben war signifikant kürzer bei Tumorausdehnung im bzw. auf den Hypopharynx (p = 0,041). Postoperativ entwickelten 72,7 % der Patienten eine pharyngokutane Fistel unabhängig von einer simultanen Defektrekonstruktion. Nur 24 % der der aufgetretenen Fisteln mussten operativ therapiert werden. Der Krankenhausaufenthalt betrug 28,0 ± 16,1 Tage. Schlussfolgerung Die Salvage-Laryngektomie ist mit vielen, aber beherrschbaren Komplikationen und einer hohen Morbidität verbunden. In Anbetracht der behandelten fortgeschrittenen Tumorkategorien und der Gesamtsituation des Patienten sind respektable onkologische Ergebnisse zu erreichen. Zusatzmaterial online Die Online-Version dieses Beitrags (10.1007/s00106-021-01029-w) enthält eine Übersicht über die Patientenkohorte. Beitrag und Zusatzmaterial stehen Ihnen auf www.springermedizin.de zur Verfügung. Bitte geben Sie dort den Beitragstitel in die Suche ein, das Zusatzmaterial finden Sie beim Beitrag unter „Ergänzende Inhalte“. ![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matti Sievert
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland.
| | - Miguel Goncalves
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Benedicta Binder
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Sarina K Mueller
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Robin Rupp
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Michael Koch
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Stephan Dürr
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Traxdorf
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Markus Hecht
- Strahlenklinik, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Heinrich Iro
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| | - Antoniu-Oreste Gostian
- Hals-Nasen-Ohrenklinik, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie, Universitätskliniken Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstraße 1, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hashida N, Shamoto H, Maeda K, Wakabayashi H. Impact of geniohyoid and masseter muscle masses on dysphagia after salvage surgery and radiotherapy in head and neck cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:2278. [PMID: 33500539 PMCID: PMC7838417 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82039-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether geniohyoid and/or masseter muscle mass can predict the severity of dysphagia after salvage surgery for head and neck cancer. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 45 male patients with head and neck cancer (median age, 68 years) who underwent salvage surgery. The preoperative geniohyoid and masseter muscle masses were evaluated using computed tomography and the severity of dysphagia was evaluated by Penetration Aspiration Scale (PAS), Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) and Oropharyngeal swallow efficiency (OPSE). The median PAS, FOIS and OPSE scores after surgery were 7 (interquartile range [IQR] 1–8), 6 (IQR 2–7) and 95.8 (IQR 67.1–116.2), respectively. The mean geniohyoid muscle masses were 3.13 ± 0.78 cm2 and the mean masseter muscle masses were 4.37 ± 0.99 cm2, respectively. The multivariate analysis showed that the geniohyoid muscle mass was significantly associated with the PAS, FOIS and OPSE scores. Conversely, the masseter muscle mass was not significantly associated with the PAS score but was significantly associated with the FOIS and OPSE scores. Geniohyoid muscle mass may predict the severity of dysphagia after salvage surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nao Hashida
- Department of Rehabilitation, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka City, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Shamoto
- Takano Hospital, Futaba-County, Fukushima, Japan.,Department of Disaster and Comprehensive Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima City, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Keisuke Maeda
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka, Obu, Aichi, 474-8511, Japan.
| | - Hidetaka Wakabayashi
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Smith JB, Shew M, Karadaghy OA, Nallani R, Sykes KJ, Gan GN, Brant JA, Bur AM. Predicting salvage laryngectomy in patients treated with primary nonsurgical therapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma using machine learning. Head Neck 2020; 42:2330-2339. [PMID: 32383544 PMCID: PMC10601023 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Machine learning (ML) algorithms may predict patients who will require salvage total laryngectomy (STL) after primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS Patients treated for T1-T3a laryngeal SCC were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multiple ML algorithms were trained to predict which patients would go on to require STL after primary nonsurgical treatment. RESULTS A total of 16 440 cases were included. The best classification performance was achieved with a gradient boosting algorithm, which achieved accuracy of 76.0% (95% CI 74.5-77.5) and area under the curve = 0.762. The most important variables used to construct the model were distance from residence to treating facility and days from diagnosis to start of treatment. CONCLUSION We can identify patients likely to fail primary radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and who will go on to require STL by applying ML techniques and argue for high-quality, multidisciplinary regionalized care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua B. Smith
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Matthew Shew
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Omar A. Karadaghy
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Rohit Nallani
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Kevin J. Sykes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Gregory N. Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jason A. Brant
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospitals of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Andrés M. Bur
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bertolin A, Lionello M, Ghizzo M, Cena I, Leone F, Valerini S, Mattioli F, Crosetti E, Presutti L, Succo G, Rizzotto G. Salvage open partial horizontal laryngectomy after failed radiotherapy: A multicentric study. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:431-436. [PMID: 31046149 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The primary aim of the present study was to report our multi-institutional experience in surgical salvage with open partial horizontal laryngectomies (OPHL) after failed radiotherapy (RT) for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). Secondary aims were to analyze the prognostic meaning of the main clinical and pathological parameters in relation to the oncologic outcome and to compare our results with the available literature. STUDY DESIGN A retrospective multicenter analysis of surgical oncological outcomes. METHODS We retrospectively review the clinical charts of 70 recurrent LSCC patients after primary RT failure undergone salvage OPHL. RESULTS At last follow-up, 46 patients (65%) were disease-free; six (9%) were alive with disease; nine (12%) died because of the disease; and nine (12%) died without evidence of disease. The final local control, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and laryngectomy-free survival were 87%, 75%, 87%, and 91%, respectively. Twelve patients (17%) experienced postoperative complications, whereas 18 patients (25%) experienced late sequelae. In five patients (7%), decannulation was not possible because of postoperative laryngeal stenosis. CONCLUSION In selected patients, when proper selection criteria for conservation laryngeal surgery are adopted, OPHL can be considered for salvage after RT failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 Laryngoscope, 130:431-436, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Bertolin
- Otorhinolaryngology Service, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marco Lionello
- Otorhinolaryngology Service, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Marco Ghizzo
- Otorhinolaryngology Service, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Isida Cena
- Otorhinolaryngology Service, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | | | - Sara Valerini
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Francesco Mattioli
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Erika Crosetti
- Head Neck Oncology Unit Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Livio Presutti
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Succo
- Head Neck Oncology Unit Candiolo Cancer Institute-FPO IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.,Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Rizzotto
- Otorhinolaryngology Service, Vittorio Veneto Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prognostic and predictive factors in recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A review of the literature. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 137:84-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2018] [Revised: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
14
|
Abstract
Successful management of laryngeal cancer depends on careful pretreatment evaluation of patient and disease factors to arrive at accurate staging, leading to appropriate treatment selection for patients with this highly impacting disease. Surgical modalities, including transoral laser microsurgery, open partial laryngectomy, and total laryngectomy, offer options, alone or in combination with radiation and chemotherapy. Treatment strategy for laryngeal cancer should strive for cure while maintaining the best quality of life possible for the patient. Achieving the goals of initial and salvage treatment for laryngeal cancer depends on executing a plan of care determined by the expertise of the multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
|
15
|
Elbers JBW, Veldhuis LI, Bhairosing PA, Smeele LE, Jóźwiak K, van den Brekel MWM, Verheij M, Al-Mamgani A, Zuur CL. Salvage surgery for advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma following radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2019; 276:647-655. [PMID: 30673847 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05292-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 01/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Salvage surgery for recurrent advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is known to result in poor prognosis. As there are only small and heterogeneous studies available with wide variety in outcome measures, our purpose was to select and pool literature according to specific criteria. METHODS Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcome after salvage surgery for recurrent advanced stage HNSCC following primary radiotherapy or chemoradiation. RESULTS 16 of 3956 screened studies were included for analysis (729 patients). Pooled 5-year OS was 37% (95% CI 30-45%, 12 studies, 17 outcome measurements, 540 patients). Outcome was presented for larynx (6 studies, 397 patients), hypopharynx (2 studies, 47 patients), larynx and hypopharynx combined (3 studies, 69 patients) or separately (1 study, 134 patients), oral cavity (1 study, 11 patients), oropharynx (1 study, 34 patients) and multiple subsites combined (2 studies, 37 patients). There was no significant difference in survival outcome between subsites (pheterogeneity = 0.8116). The pooled tumor-positive resection margin rate was 32% and pooled re-operation rate 17%. Complication rates from the pooled data were: fistulas 33%, wound infections 24% and flap failure 3%. Treatment-related mortality rate was 1% and mean hospital stay was 23 days. CONCLUSIONS Salvage surgery for recurrent advanced stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after primary (chemo)radiotherapy is a good last resort curative treatment option, resulting in 37% overall survival at 5 years. As data from advanced stage non-laryngeal tumors were sparse, no solid conclusions can be drawn with regard to outcome differences between tumor subsites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joris B W Elbers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lars I Veldhuis
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick A Bhairosing
- Scientific Information Service, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ludi E Smeele
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katarzyna Jóźwiak
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel W M van den Brekel
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Abrahim Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Charlotte L Zuur
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. .,Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Varghese BT, Patil S. Completion Total Laryngectomy Ten Years After Near Total Laryngectomy for Radiorecurrent Cancer of the Glottis. Indian J Surg Oncol 2018; 9:605-608. [PMID: 30538399 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-018-0795-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Near total laryngectomy (NTL) is a safe alternative to total laryngectomy in salvaging lateralized radiation failures. A 65-year-old gentleman with radiorecurrent T1 vocal cord cancer was salvaged successfully by NTL. Ten years later, he presented with a strained shunt speech which was treated judiciously, with the aid of a positron emission tomography (PET) scan, by a (completion) total laryngectomy (TL), bilateral selective neck dissection, and pharyngeal resurfacing with pectoralis major myocutaneous (PMMC) flap. The patient is on close follow-up after the second salvage procedure, for 20 months without any locoregional disease recurrence. A high index of suspicion can clinch the diagnosis of a post-NTL recurrence in a disease-free patient on follow-up because of the excellent speech preservation and aspiration-free swallowing that is possible which can only be altered if the patient develops a recurrence or second primary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bipin T Varghese
- Division of Surgical Oncology (Head and Neck Services), Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala 695011 India
| | - Shirish Patil
- Division of Surgical Oncology (Head and Neck Services), Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala 695011 India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
McSpadden R, Zender C, Eskander A. AHNS series: Do you know your guidelines? Guideline recommendations for recurrent and persistent head and neck cancer after primary treatment. Head Neck 2018; 41:7-15. [PMID: 30536532 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 08/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Locoregional recurrent/persistent head and neck cancer following primary treatment is a significant challenge as it is usually difficult to treat and has worse outcomes compared to the primary setting. Surgical resection of a local or regional recurrence offers the best chance of cure when feasible. Local recurrence outcomes vary by subsite with laryngeal recurrences having the best prognoses and hypopharynx having the worst. Instances of persistent neck masses following primary nonsurgical treatment can be evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET) with CT (PET-CT) when there is no definitive diagnosis of a recurrence/persistence. Reirradiation with or without chemotherapy can be considered for primary treatment when surgery is not an option, for adjuvant treatment following salvage surgery, or for palliation. Immunotherapy represents a newer class of chemotherapeutic agents. Current guidelines recommend enrollment in clinical trials especially when surgery is not an option as outcomes remain universally poor in the recurrent/persistent setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan McSpadden
- Department of Head & Neck, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Chad Zender
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Head & Neck Oncology, University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, Division of Head & Neck Oncology, University of Toronto, Sunnybrook Health Sciences and the Odette Cancer Centre, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kim JH, Kim WS, Koh YW, Kim SH, Byeon HK, Choi EC. Oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage supracricoid partial laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2018; 138:1117-1122. [PMID: 30702020 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1506154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Supracricoid partial laryngectomy (SCL) can have a positive impact on patients' quality of life by circumventing dysphagia and voice problems resulting from creation of a permanent stoma after conventional total laryngectomy (TL) surgery. AIMS/OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the oncologic and functional outcomes of salvage SCL for recurrent laryngeal carcinoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-five patients that underwent salvage surgery for recurrent laryngeal carcinoma between January 2004 and May 2015 after initial treatment failure were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS Overall survival and disease free survival were non-significantly higher in the salvage SCL group (n = 14) than in the salvage TL group (n = 31) (87.5 versus 56.5%, 53.4 versus 41.9%). Multivariate analyses showed only positive resection margin to be significantly associated with survival and recurrence (HR 9.974, p = .007, and HR 9.196, p = .002, respectively). In the salvage SCL group, 92.8% achieved successful decannulation and all patients returned to an oral diet. All patients in the salvage TL group sustained a permanent stoma and conversation was possible only through esophageal voice or a voice prosthesis. 74.2% of patients in the group were able to tolerate an oral diet. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE Salvage SCL showed comparable oncologic outcomes and favorable functional outcomes relative to the classic salvage TL. This study could provide a sufficient basis of SCL as salvage treatment for recurrent laryngeal carcinoma in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hoon Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Ilsanro, Wonju, Korea
| | - Won Shik Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University, Gwanak-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Woo Koh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se-Heon Kim
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Kwon Byeon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, South Korea
| | - Eun Chang Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Steinbichler TB, Lichtenecker M, Anegg M, Dejaco D, Kofler B, Schartinger VH, Kasseroler MT, Forthuber B, Posch A, Riechelmann H. Persistent Head and Neck Cancer Following First-Line Treatment. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10110421. [PMID: 30400290 PMCID: PMC6265977 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10110421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Following first-line treatment of head and neck cancer (HNC), persistent disease may require second-line treatment. Methods: All patients with HNC treated between 2008 and 2016 were included. Second-line treatment modalities and survival of patients were analyzed. Results: After first-line therapy, 175/741 patients had persistent disease. Of these, 112 were considered eligible for second-line treatment. Second-line treatment resulted in 50% complete response. Median overall survival of patients receiving second-line therapy was 24 (95% CI: 19 to 29) months; otherwise survival was 10 (9 to 11; p < 0.0001) months. Patients receiving second-line surgery had a median overall survival of 45 (28 to 62) months, patients receiving second-line radiotherapy had a median overall survival of 37 (0 to 79; p = 0.17) months, and patients receiving systemic therapy had a median overall survival of 13 (10 to 16; p < 0.001) months. Patients with persistent HNC in the neck had a better median survival (45 months; 16 to 74 months; p = 0.001) than patients with persistence at other sites. Conclusion: Early treatment response evaluation allows early initiation of second-line treatment and offers selected patients with persistent disease a realistic chance to achieve complete response after all. If possible, surgery or radiotherapy are preferable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teresa Bernadette Steinbichler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Madeleine Lichtenecker
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Maria Anegg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Daniel Dejaco
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Barbara Kofler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Volker Hans Schartinger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Maria-Therese Kasseroler
- Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Britta Forthuber
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Andrea Posch
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| | - Herbert Riechelmann
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
The Current Role of Salvage Surgery in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2018; 10:cancers10080267. [PMID: 30103407 PMCID: PMC6115801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers10080267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2018] [Revised: 08/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemoradiotherapy has emerged as a gold standard in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Because 50% of advanced stage patients relapse after nonsurgical primary treatment, the role of salvage surgery (SS) is critical because surgery is generally regarded as the best treatment option in patients with recurrent resectable SCCHN. Surgeons are increasingly confronted with considering operation among patients with significant effects of failed non-surgical primary treatment. Wide local excision to achieve clear margins must be balanced with the morbidity of the procedure, the functional consequences of organ mutilation, and the likelihood of success. Accurate selection of patients suitable for surgery is a major issue. It is essential to establish objective criteria based on functional and oncologic outcomes to select the best candidates for SS. The authors propose first to understand preoperative prognostic factors influencing survival. Predictive modeling based on preoperative information is now available to better select patients having a good chance to be successfully treated with surgery. Patients with a high comorbidity index, advanced oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal primary tumors, and both local and regional recurrence have a very limited likelihood of success with salvage surgery and should be strongly considered for other treatments. Following SS, identifying patients with postoperative prognostic factors predicting high risk of recurrence is essential because those patients could benefit of adjuvant treatment or be included in clinical trials. Finally, defining HPV tumor status is needed in future studies including recurrent oropharyngeal SCC patients.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cheraghlou S, Kuo P, Mehra S, Yarbrough WG, Judson BL. Salvage Surgery after Radiation Failure in T1/T2 Larynx Cancer: Outcomes following Total versus Conservation Surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2018; 158:497-504. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599817742596] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Objective After radiation failure for early T-stage larynx cancer, national guidelines recommend salvage surgery. Total laryngectomy and conservation laryngeal surgery with an open or endoscopic approach are both used. Beyond single-institution studies, there is a lack of evidence concerning the outcomes of these procedures. We aim to study whether treatment with conservation laryngeal surgery is associated with poorer outcomes than treatment with total laryngectomy as salvage surgery after radiation failure for T1/T2 larynx cancers. Study Design A retrospective study was conducted of adult squamous cell larynx cancer cases in the National Cancer Database diagnosed from 2004 to 2012. Setting Commission on Cancer cancer programs in the United States. Methods Demographic, facility, tumor, and survival variables were included in the analyses. Multivariate survival regressions as well as univariate Kaplan-Meier analyses were conducted. Results Slightly more than 7% of patients receiving radiotherapy for T1/T2 larynx cancers later received salvage surgery. Salvage with partial laryngectomy was not associated with diminished survival as compared with total laryngectomy. However, positive surgical margins were associated with worse outcomes (hazard ratio, 1.782; P = .001), and a larger percentage of patients receiving partial laryngectomy had positive margins than those receiving total laryngectomy. Facility characteristics were not associated with differences in salvage surgery type or outcomes. Conclusion In recognition of the inherent selection bias, patients who experienced recurrences after radiation for T1/T2 larynx cancer and underwent conservation salvage laryngeal surgery demonstrated clinical outcomes similar to those of patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy. Increased rates of positive surgical margins were observed among patients undergoing salvage conservation surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shayan Cheraghlou
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Phoebe Kuo
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saral Mehra
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Wendell G. Yarbrough
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Benjamin L. Judson
- Division of Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Forastiere AA, Ismaila N, Lewin JS, Nathan CA, Adelstein DJ, Eisbruch A, Fass G, Fisher SG, Laurie SA, Le QT, O'Malley B, Mendenhall WM, Patel S, Pfister DG, Provenzano AF, Weber R, Weinstein GS, Wolf GT. Use of Larynx-Preservation Strategies in the Treatment of Laryngeal Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:1143-1169. [PMID: 29172863 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.75.7385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To update the guideline recommendations on the use of larynx-preservation strategies in the treatment of laryngeal cancer. Methods An Expert Panel updated the systematic review of the literature for the period from January 2005 to May 2017. Results The panel confirmed that the use of a larynx-preservation approach for appropriately selected patients does not compromise survival. No larynx-preservation approach offered a survival advantage compared with total laryngectomy and adjuvant therapy as indicated. Changes were supported for the use of endoscopic surgical resection in patients with limited disease (T1, T2) and for initial total laryngectomy in patients with T4a disease or with severe pretreatment laryngeal dysfunction. New recommendations for positron emission tomography imaging for the evaluation of regional nodes after treatment and best measures for evaluating voice and swallowing function were added. Recommendations Patients with T1, T2 laryngeal cancer should be treated initially with intent to preserve the larynx by using endoscopic resection or radiation therapy, with either leading to similar outcomes. For patients with locally advanced (T3, T4) disease, organ-preservation surgery, combined chemotherapy and radiation, or radiation alone offer the potential for larynx preservation without compromising overall survival. For selected patients with extensive T3 or large T4a lesions and/or poor pretreatment laryngeal function, better survival rates and quality of life may be achieved with total laryngectomy. Patients with clinically involved regional cervical nodes (N+) who have a complete clinical and radiologic imaging response after chemoradiation do not require elective neck dissection. All patients should undergo a pretreatment baseline assessment of voice and swallowing function and receive counseling with regard to the potential impact of treatment options on voice, swallowing, and quality of life. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/head-neck-cancer-guidelines and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arlene A Forastiere
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Nofisat Ismaila
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Jan S Lewin
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Cherie Ann Nathan
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David J Adelstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gail Fass
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Susan G Fisher
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Scott A Laurie
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Quynh-Thu Le
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Bernard O'Malley
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - William M Mendenhall
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Snehal Patel
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David G Pfister
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Anthony F Provenzano
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Randy Weber
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory S Weinstein
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Gregory T Wolf
- Arlene A. Forastiere, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD; Nofisat Ismaila, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA; Jan S. Lewin and Randy Weber, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Cherie Ann Nathan, LSU Health, Shreveport, LA; David J. Adelstein, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Avraham Eisbruch and Gregory T. Wolf, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Gail Fass, Support for People With Oral Head and Neck Cancer, Locust Valley; Bernard O'Malley, Snehal Patel, and David G. Pfister, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; Anthony F. Provenzano, New York-Presbyterian Lawrence Hospital, New York, NY; Susan G. Fisher, Temple University; Gregory S. Weinstein, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Scott A. Laurie, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Quynh-Thu Le, Stanford University, Stanford, CA; and William M. Mendenhall, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Liu J, Zhang Y, Li Z, Liu S, Li H, Xu Z. Benefit of salvage total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for recurrent locally advanced head and neck cancer after radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:164. [PMID: 29073917 PMCID: PMC5658928 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0900-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The treatment modalities for recurrent locally advanced head and neck cancer failure after radiotherapy are limited with poor prognosis. Salvage supra-radical operation seems to be an option. It has not been established which patients will benefit from salvage total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 66 patients with previously irradiated recurrent T4 head and neck cancer who underwent salvage total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy at our institution between January 2001 and June 2014. The clinical outcome and toxicities were analyzed. Results Flap loss occurred in 2 patients, and the incidence of fistulas and anastomosis strictures was 15.6% (10/66) and 13.6% (9/66), respectively. The median survival time of the entire cohort was 12 months. The interval between radiation and salvage surgery, and microscopic carotid artery invasion were identified as independent prognostic factors for overall survival. The 3-year overall survival rates of patients with (n = 33) and without (n = 33) risk factors were 9.1% and 47.2%, respectively (p = 0.007). A time interval between radiation and salvage surgery ≤6 months and previous concurrent chemotherapy or targeted therapy were risk factors for severe post-operative complications. Conclusions Salvage total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy is beneficial to selected patients with recurrent locally advanced head and neck cancer after radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Liu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Head and Neck Ward 1, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhengjiang Li
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Head and Neck Ward 1, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Shaoyan Liu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Head and Neck Ward 1, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Huizheng Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Dalian Friendship Hospital, Dalian, China
| | - Zhengang Xu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, No 17 Panjiayuan Nanli, Chaoyang District, Head and Neck Ward 1, Beijing, 100021, China.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Scharpf J, Ward M, Adelstein D, Koyfman S, Li M. Elucidation of salvage laryngectomy pathologic and clinical variables to guide further treatment intensification investigation. Laryngoscope 2017; 128:823-830. [DOI: 10.1002/lary.26782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2017] [Accepted: 06/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Scharpf
- Head and Neck Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| | - Matthew Ward
- Radiation Oncology; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| | - David Adelstein
- Solid Tumor Oncology; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| | - Shlomo Koyfman
- Radiation Oncology; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| | - Mingsi Li
- Head and Neck Institute; Cleveland Clinic Foundation; Cleveland Ohio U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Graville DJ, Palmer AD, Chambers CM, Ottenstein L, Whalen B, Andersen PE, Wax MK, Cohen JI. Functional outcomes and quality of life after total laryngectomy with noncircumferential radial forearm free tissue transfer. Head Neck 2017; 39:2319-2328. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.24902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2017] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Donna J. Graville
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon
| | - Andrew D. Palmer
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon
| | | | | | - Breanne Whalen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon
| | - Peter E. Andersen
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon
| | - Mark K. Wax
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery; Oregon Health & Science University; Portland Oregon
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Park JW, Lee SW, Kim JS, Song SY. Prediction of local control in early glottic carcinoma using the maximum standardised uptake value. Cancer Radiother 2017; 21:205-209. [PMID: 28495481 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2017.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2017] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This retrospective study aimed to determine whether the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) can predict local tumour control in early glottic cancer (Tis, T1, and T2). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty-nine patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for early glottic cancer between 2003 and 2011 were enrolled. We evaluated the SUVmax in the region of interest around the original tumour site. Local tumour control and survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the optimal SUVmax cut-off for predicting local control. RESULTS As determined by laryngoscopy, all patients achieved a complete response. Eleven patients experienced local recurrence, while no distant metastasis occurred. One patient died due to local recurrence, while five lost their larynxes. The median follow-up was 61.5 (range: 6.2-123.4) months. The five-year local progression-free survival was 84.7%, and larynx preservation was possible in 89.6% of cases. The median SUVmax was 2.2. The optimal SUVmax for predicting local tumour control was identified as 3.4. Patients with glottic cancers with an SUVmax>3.4 showed a significantly lower local progression-free survival rate than those with tumours with an SUVmax<3.4 (five-year local progression-free survival rate: 53.4% vs. 95.4%, P<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a high SUVmax was an independent predictive factor for local progression-free survival (P=0.006). CONCLUSION The use of (18F)-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography for evaluation of the SUVmax is useful to predict local progression-free survival in patients with early glottic cancer treated by radiation. Early glottic cancer with a high SUVmax may require aggressive local treatment and careful surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J W Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 170, Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, 42415 Daegu, South Korea
| | - S W Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 86 Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - J S Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 86 Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - S Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, 86 Asanbyeongwon-gil, Songpa-gu, 138-736 Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ahn SH, Hong HJ, Kwon SY, Kwon KH, Roh JL, Ryu J, Park JH, Baek SK, Lee GH, Lee SY, Lee JC, Chung MK, Joo YH, Ji YB, Hah JH, Kwon M, Park YM, Song CM, Shin SC, Ryu CH, Lee DY, Lee YC, Chang JW, Jeong HM, Cho JK, Cha W, Chun BJ, Choi IJ, Choi HG, Lee KD. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 10:1-43. [PMID: 28043099 PMCID: PMC5327593 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2016.01389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jun Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Hwan Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junsun Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Hee Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung-Kuk Baek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Ji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hun Hah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Myeon Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ha Min Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Wonjae Cha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung Joon Chun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ik Joon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Geun Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Dae Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Relationship between the time to locoregional recurrence and survival in laryngeal squamous-cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 274:2267-2271. [DOI: 10.1007/s00405-017-4473-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
29
|
Hamoir M, Holvoet E, Ambroise J, Lengelé B, Schmitz S. Salvage surgery in recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Oncologic outcome and predictors of disease free survival. Oral Oncol 2017; 67:1-9. [PMID: 28351561 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2016] [Revised: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 01/14/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Salvage surgery in recurrent SCCHN is associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to better identify suitable surgical candidates and those at high risk of new recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Single-center retrospective analysis of 109 patients undergoing salvage surgery for recurrent SCCHN. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS The following factors showed a significant impact on DFS: Disease-free interval >6months [HR 0.53; p=0.04], age>70years [HR 0.26; p=0.03], primary chemoradiotherapy [HR 2.39; p<0.01] compared to radiotherapy, oropharynx [HR 5.46; p<0.01] and hypopharynx [HR 3.92; p=<0.01] sites, compared to larynx, initial stage III [HR 7.10; p<0.01] and stage IV [HR 4.13; p<0.01], compared to stage I, locoregional recurrence [HR 4.57; p<0.01], compared to local recurrence. Univariate analysis also identified significant postoperative predictors of poor DFS including flap reconstruction [HR 3.44; p<0.01], postoperative complications [HR 2.09; p=0.01], positive margins [HR 3.64; p<0.01] and close margins [HR 3.83; p<0.01]. On multivariate analysis, oropharynx site [HR 3.98; p<0.01], initial stage III [HR 5.93; p<0.01] and locoregional recurrence [HR 2.93; p=0.04] were independent preoperative prognostic factors for DFS. Positive margins [HR 2.32; p=0.04], close margins [HR 2.94; p=0.02], extracapsular spread (ECS) [HR 4.04; p=0.03] and postoperative complications [HR 3.64; p<0.01] were independent postoperative prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS Patients with advanced primary nonlaryngeal tumor and locoregional recurrence have limited success with salvage surgery. Because patients with positive margins and ECS are at high risk of relapse, adjuvant treatment should be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Hamoir
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, St Luc University HospitaI and King Albert II Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Emma Holvoet
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, St Luc University HospitaI and King Albert II Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jerôme Ambroise
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Center for Applied Molecular Technologies (CTMA), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Benoît Lengelé
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Albert II Cancer Institute & St Luc University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Sandra Schmitz
- Department of Head & Neck Surgery, St Luc University HospitaI and King Albert II Cancer Institute, Brussels, Belgium; Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Wiegand S. Evidence and evidence gaps of laryngeal cancer surgery. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2016; 15:Doc03. [PMID: 28025603 PMCID: PMC5169076 DOI: 10.3205/cto000130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer has been established for decades. In addition to total laryngectomy, which was first performed in 1873, a large number or organ preservation surgical techniques, like open partial laryngectomy, transoral laser microsurgery, and transoral robotic surgery have been developed. Studies on laryngeal cancer surgery are mainly retrospective case series and cohort studies. The evolution of chemoradiation protocols and their analysis in prospective randomized trials have led to an increasing acceptance of non-surgical treatment procedures. In addition to an improvement of prognosis, in recent years the preservation of function and maintenance of life quality after primary therapy of laryngeal cancer has increasingly become the focus of therapy planning. Significant late toxicity after chemoradiation has been identified as an important issue. This leads to a reassessment of surgical concepts and initiation of studies on laryngeal cancer surgery which was additionally stimulated by the advent of transoral robotic surgery in the US. Improving the evidence base of laryngeal cancer surgery by successful establishment of surgical trials should be the future goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne Wiegand
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Eskiizmir G, Baskın Y, Yalçın F, Ellidokuz H, Ferris RL. Risk factors for radiation failure in early-stage glottic carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Oncol 2016; 62:90-100. [PMID: 27865377 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2016.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Revised: 10/08/2016] [Accepted: 10/16/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities for early-stage glottic carcinoma. Unfortunately, local failure may occur in a group of cases with T1-T2 glottic carcinoma. This meta-analysis sought to determine risk factors for radiation failure in patients with early-stage glottic carcinoma. METHODS A systematic and comprehensive search was performed for related studies published between 1995 and 2014. The primary end-point was 5-year local control. Data extraction and analysis were performed using the software STATA/SE 13.1 for Windows. RESULTS Twenty-seven studies were eligible. A higher risk of radiation failure was demonstrated in male patients [relative risk (RR): 0.927, p<0.001] and those with low hemoglobin level (RR: 0.891, p<0.001) with a high agreement between studies (I-squared=0.0%). Moreover, T2 tumors (RR: 0.795, p<0.001), tumors with anterior commissure involvement (RR: 0.904, p<0.001), tobacco use during/after therapy (RR: 0.824, p<0.001), and "bulky" tumors (RR: 1.270, p<0.001] or tumors bigger in size (RR: 1.332, p<0.001]. Poorly differentiated tumors had a questionable risk of local failure, although a moderate to high interstudy heterogeneity was determined. A statistically significant contribution was not detected for age, presence of comorbidity, alcohol use or subglottic extension. CONCLUSION This is the first meta-analysis which assessed the potential risk factors for radiation failure in patients with early-stage glottic carcinoma. Gender and pretreatment hemoglobin level are major influential factors associated with radiation failure in patients with early-stage glottic carcinoma. However, prospective, randomized clinical trials may permit better stratification of their relative contributions, and those who may benefit more from upfront surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Görkem Eskiizmir
- Celal Bayar University, Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Manisa, Turkey.
| | - Yasemin Baskın
- Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Oncology, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Femin Yalçın
- Katip Celebi University, Department of Engineering Sciences, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Hülya Ellidokuz
- Dokuz Eylül University, Institute of Oncology, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Robert L Ferris
- University of Pittsburgh, Division of Head Neck Surgery, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Mandelbaum RS, Abemayor E, Mendelsohn AH. Laryngeal Preservation in Glottic Cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 155:265-73. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599816639248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2015] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Objective When total laryngectomy is not required, organ preservation surgery or radiotherapy is considered the standard of care for primary glottic cancer. These accepted treatment options are available for early and advanced glottic cancers due to equivalent locoregional control and survival rates. However, in today’s climate of accountable care, the financial burden of treatment choices continues to increase in significance. We therefore compared hospital charges and treatment-related morbidity between organ-preserving surgery and radiation with or without chemotherapy—herein, (chemo)radiation—in the primary treatment of glottic cancer. Study Design Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database was analyzed to assess clinical and financial information. Setting Population-based analysis. Subjects Patients (N = 5499) with primary glottic cancer undergoing treatment with laryngeal preservation strategies. Methods Patients were subdivided by ICD-9 codes into 3 treatment groups: endoscopic resection, open partial laryngectomy, and (chemo)radiation. Treatment-related outcomes, charges, and length of hospitalization were analyzed among treatment groups. Results When adjusting for sex, age, race, comorbidity, and primary payer, (chemo)radiotherapy was associated with increased direct charges ( P < .001; coefficient, $23,658.99; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: $10,227.15-$37,090.84) and length of hospitalization ( P < .001; hazard ratio, 0.593; 95% CI: 0.502-0.702) when compared with endoscopic surgery. As compared with open surgery, endoscopic surgery was associated with reduced hospital charges ( P = .012; coefficient, $11,967.01; 95% CI: $2,784.17-$21,249.85) and duration of hospitalization ( P < .001; hazard ratio, 0.749; 95% CI: 0.641-0.876). Conclusions This analysis suggests that increased utilization of endoscopic surgery in patients with primary glottic cancer not requiring total laryngectomy may lead to reduced financial burden and duration of hospitalization when compared with open surgery or (chemo)radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S. Mandelbaum
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elliot Abemayor
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Abie H. Mendelsohn
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chen MM, Holsinger FC, Laccourreye O. Salvage Conservation Laryngeal Surgery After Radiation Therapy Failure. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2015; 48:667-75. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2015.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
|
34
|
Cost-effectiveness of heat and moisture exchangers compared to usual care for pulmonary rehabilitation after total laryngectomy in Poland. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015; 272:2381-8. [PMID: 25832966 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-015-3618-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The beneficial physical and psychosocial effects of heat and moisture exchangers (HMEs) for pulmonary rehabilitation of laryngectomy patients are well evidenced. However, cost-effectiveness in terms of costs per additional quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) has not yet been investigated. Therefore, a model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of using HMEs versus usual care (UC) (including stoma covers, suction system and/or external humidifier) for patients after laryngectomy was performed. Primary outcomes were costs, QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Secondary outcomes were pulmonary infections, and sleeping problems. The analysis was performed from a health care perspective of Poland, using a time horizon of 10 years and cycle length of 1 year. Transition probabilities were derived from various sources, amongst others a Polish randomized clinical trial. Quality of life data was derived from an Italian study on similar patients. Data on frequencies and mortality-related tracheobronchitis and/or pneumonia were derived from a Europe-wide survey amongst head and neck cancer experts. Substantial differences in quality-adjusted survival between the use of HMEs (3.63 QALYs) versus UC (2.95 QALYs) were observed. Total health care costs/patient were 39,553 PLN (9465 Euro) for the HME strategy and 4889 PLN (1168 Euro) for the UC strategy. HME use resulted in fewer pulmonary infections, and less sleeping problems. We could conclude that given the Polish threshold of 99,000 PLN/QALY, using HMEs is cost-effective compared to UC, resulting in 51,326 PLN/QALY (12,264 Euro/QALY) gained for patients after total laryngectomy. For the hospital period alone (2 weeks), HMEs were cost-saving: less costly and more effective.
Collapse
|
35
|
Muhamedov M, Kulbakin D, Gunther V, Choynzonov E, Chekalkin T, Hodorenko V. Sparing surgery with the use of tini-based endografts in larynx cancer patients. J Surg Oncol 2014; 111:231-6. [PMID: 25176032 DOI: 10.1002/jso.23779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marat Muhamedov
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute; Russian Academy of Medical Science; Tomsk Russia
| | - Denis Kulbakin
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute; Russian Academy of Medical Science; Tomsk Russia
| | - Victor Gunther
- Research Institute of Medical Materials; Tomsk State University; Tomsk Russia
| | - Evgeniy Choynzonov
- Tomsk Cancer Research Institute; Russian Academy of Medical Science; Tomsk Russia
| | - Timofey Chekalkin
- Research Institute of Medical Materials; Tomsk State University; Tomsk Russia
| | - Valentina Hodorenko
- Research Institute of Medical Materials; Tomsk State University; Tomsk Russia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Moon S, Raffa F, Ojo R, Landera MA, Weed DT, Sargi Z, Lundy D. Changing trends of speech outcomes after total laryngectomy in the 21st century: a single-center study. Laryngoscope 2014; 124:2508-12. [PMID: 24729127 DOI: 10.1002/lary.24717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2014] [Revised: 03/15/2014] [Accepted: 04/08/2014] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To describe the speech rehabilitation outcomes of patients undergoing total laryngectomy (TL) in the 21st century. STUDY DESIGN Retrospective chart review. SETTING Tertiary academic center SUBJECTS AND METHODS Retrospective review of 167 patients who underwent TL from June 2000 to February 2012. Demographics, disease variables, and surgical factors were reviewed. Primary alaryngeal speech modality, speech outcome, and tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) complication rates were assessed. RESULTS Overall TEP speech success rate (primary or secondary) was 72%. Overall TEP speech success rate was 76% for those with primary TEP and was 68% for those with secondary TEP. TEP speech success rates at first, second, and beyond second year were 75%, 72%, and 70%, respectively. Success rates for primary TL, salvage TL, primary TL with pharyngeal reconstruction, or salvage TL with pharyngeal reconstruction groups were 71%, 72%, 73%, and 71%, respectively. TEP-related complications occurred in 43% of patients, with no difference in complication rates between primary versus salvage TL or primary versus secondary TEP. For those with complications, TEP success rate was 65%. CONCLUSION This study showed TEP speech-outcome success rates lower than what has been historically reported. There was no significant difference in TEP speech outcome between primary versus salvage TL or primary versus secondary TEP. Patients with TEP-related complications had TEP speech-outcome success rates comparable to those without any complication. TEP may continue to be a superior option as a mode of speech in patients with TL, including those undergoing salvage TL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seo Moon
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, U.S.A
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abouyared M, Ojo R, Fundakowski C, Lo K, Sargi Z. Transoral laser microsurgery in previously irradiated patients with laryngeal cancer. Am J Otolaryngol 2014; 35:279-85. [PMID: 24674345 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2014.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2013] [Revised: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 03/03/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early laryngeal cancer is successfully managed with transoral laser microsurgery. Previously radiated patients may experience more post-operative complications. We investigate disease-free survival and secondarily prolonged pain and chondronecrosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery after previous radiation. RESULTS Mean disease-free survival was 36.7 months. Overall disease-free survival was 57.6% at 3-year and 48.4% at 5-year follow-up, with no significant difference between surgery within as opposed to after 60 months of radiation or within as opposed to after 12 months of radiation. Thirteen patients, all with surgery within 60 months of radiation, experienced prolonged pain. Twelve experienced chondronecrosis, all within 12 months of surgery. CONCLUSION Transoral laser microsurgery for early laryngeal cancer is an adequate therapeutic option in patients with history of radiation with comparable disease-free survival to other reports. Patients undergoing transoral laser microsurgery within 60 months of radiation treatment are more likely to experience prolonged pain.
Collapse
|
38
|
|
39
|
Arshad H, Jayaprakash V, Gupta V, Cohan DM, Ambujakshan D, Rigual NR, Singh AK, Hicks WL. Survival Differences between Organ Preservation Surgery and Definitive Radiotherapy in Early Supraglottic Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 150:237-44. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599813512783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective Single-modality treatment, either with organ preservation surgery (OPS) or definitive radiation (RT), is the treatment of choice for patients with early supraglottic squamous cell carcinoma (SGC). However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 techniques are lacking. This study compares the survival outcomes in early SGC patients treated with OPS versus RT. Study Design Secondary data analysis. Setting Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database. Subjects and Methods This study included adult patients with early-stage (T1N0, T2N0) SGC undergoing single-modality treatment with either OPS (with or without neck dissection [ND]) or RT between 1988 and 2008. Survival analysis was used to compare the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) between patients treated with OPS+ND, OPS alone, and RT. Results A total of 2631 T1/T2 N0 SGC patients were identified, of whom 167 (6%) were treated with OPS+ND, 186 (7%) with OPS only, and 2278 patients (87%) with definitive RT only. In stage I (T1N0) SGC patients, a significantly better 5-year DSS was noted for both OPS+ND (81% vs 68%, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61, P = .03) and OPS only (82% vs 68%, HR = 0.70, P = .05) when compared with definitive RT. For stage II (T2N0) patients, only OPS+ND resulted in a significantly better 5-year DSS (86% vs 60%, HR = 0.31, P < .001) when compared with patients treated with RT. Conclusions Patients with early SGC who underwent OPS+ND had better OS and DSS than patients undergoing RT alone. OPS+ND may be considered a viable and preferred treatment option in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hassan Arshad
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Vijayvel Jayaprakash
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Vishal Gupta
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - David M. Cohan
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Dildeep Ambujakshan
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Nestor R. Rigual
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - Wesley L. Hicks
- Department of Head and Neck/Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
An individualised treatment algorithm for tumour stage 1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2013; 127:1127-33. [DOI: 10.1017/s0022215113002363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractObjective:To report and discuss the outcome of a treatment algorithm for patients with tumour stage 1 glottic squamous cell carcinoma.Method:A retrospective outcome analysis study was performed using data from a tertiary referral centre.Results:Sixty-nine patients were treated with radiotherapy and 26 with surgery, in accordance with the treatment algorithm. Five-year overall survival rates were the same for both treatment groups (92 per cent). Five-year disease-specific survival rates were 100 per cent for surgery, 98 per cent for radiotherapy and 99 per cent overall. The overall 5-year laryngeal preservation rate was 89.1 per cent, being 95.7 per cent for surgery patients and 86.7 per cent for radiotherapy patients (p = 0.502). There was no significant association between laryngeal preservation rates and age (p = 0.779), anterior commissure involvement (p = 0.081), tumour stage (1a or 1b) (p = 0.266) or treatment modality (surgery or radiotherapy; p = 0.220). There was no significant difference in local recurrence rates between the two treatment groups (19.3 per cent for radiotherapy vs 10.0 per cent for surgery; p = 0.220). The overall 5-year regional recurrence rate was 1.2 per cent.Conclusion:Tumour stage 1 glottic carcinoma can be managed with different treatment modalities, following an individualised treatment algorithm, with results comparable to published outcomes.
Collapse
|
41
|
Ridge JA, Lawson J, Yom SS, Garg MK, McDonald MW, Quon H, Saba N, Salama JK, Smith RV, Worden F, Yeung AR, Beitler JJ. American college of radiology appropriateness criteria®treatment of stage I T1 glottic cancer. Head Neck 2013; 36:3-8. [DOI: 10.1002/hed.23381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2013] [Accepted: 05/01/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- John A. Ridge
- Fox Chase Cancer Center; (American College of Surgeons); Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Joshua Lawson
- University of California San Diego; La Jolla California
| | - Sue S. Yom
- University of California San Francisco; San Francisco California
| | | | | | - Harry Quon
- University of Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Pennsylvania
| | - Nabil Saba
- Emory University; (American Society of Clinical Oncology); Atlanta Georgia
| | | | - Richard V. Smith
- Montefiore Medical Center; American College of Surgeons; Bronx New York
| | - Francis Worden
- University of Michigan; (American Society of Clinical Oncology); Ann Arbor Michigan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Allen CT, Lee CJ, Merati AL. Clinical Assessment and Treatment of the Dysfunctional Larynx after Radiation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 149:830-9. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599813503802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Objective To review the pathophysiology of early and late radiation-related tissue changes, methods to differentiate these changes from disease recurrence, and treatment of these changes in the irradiated larynx. Data Sources Peer-reviewed publications. Review Methods PubMed database search. Conclusions/Implications for Practice Early and late radiation-related changes in the larynx manifest variably between individual patients. Severe radiation-related tissue changes in the larynx and recurrent malignancy share many clinical characteristics, and the presence of malignancy must be considered in these patients. Positron emission tomography may help select patients who need operative biopsy to rule out recurrence. In patients with a cancer-free but dysfunctional larynx, both surgical and nonsurgical treatment options, including hyperbaric oxygen, are available for attempted salvage. Further investigation is needed before hyperbaric oxygen can be considered standard-of-care treatment for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clint T. Allen
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Chia-Jung Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Shin-Kong Wu-Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Albert L. Merati
- Division of Laryngology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ramakrishnan Y, Drinnan M, Kwong FNK, Grant DG, Mehanna H, Jones T, Paleri V. Oncologic outcomes of transoral laser microsurgery for radiorecurrent laryngeal carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of English-language literature. Head Neck 2013; 36:280-5. [PMID: 23766141 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/24/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yujay Ramakrishnan
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - Mike Drinnan
- Department of Medical Physics; The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - Foon Ng Kee Kwong
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - David G. Grant
- Department of Medical Physics; The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - Hisham Mehanna
- School of Cancer Sciences and Institute of Head and Neck Studies and Education; University of Birmingham; Birmingham United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - Terry Jones
- Liverpool CR-UK Centre; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine; University of Liverpool; United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| | - Vinidh Paleri
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Newcastle upon Tyne United Kingdom
- Department of Otolaryngology- Head and Neck Surgery; Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust; Nottingham United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Han MW, Kim SA, Cho KJ, Lee JH, Lim HK, Roh JL, Choi SH, Kim SY, Nam SY. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography findings for patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 2013; 133:620-5. [PMID: 23448356 DOI: 10.3109/00016489.2012.761352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
CONCLUSIONS Computed tomography (CT) imaging has clear limitations for the diagnosis of cartilage invasion or tumor spread in recurrent laryngeal cancer. Alternative methods of pretreatment assessment are needed for recurrent laryngeal cancer. OBJECTIVES The diagnosis and staging of recurrent laryngeal cancer, previously treated by radiation therapy (RT), remains challenging. Practically, surgeons need to depend on imaging to predict which patients will have a chance for conservation salvage laryngectomy. The purpose of the present study was to determine the accuracy of preoperative CT performed for recurrent laryngeal carcinoma evaluation following RT. METHODS This retrospective review identified 32 patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy after RT from 1998 to 2010. For our radiologic classification of the thyroid cartilage, we analyzed the conditions as normal, sclerosis, invasion, penetration, and extralaryngeal spread and categorized the state of the arytenoids and cricoid into three possible conditions: normal, sclerosis, and destruction. Radiographic findings were correlated with pathology findings. RESULTS Sensitivity and specificity for the detection of the thyroid cartilage infiltration were 57% and 94%, 50% and 89% for the cricoid cartilage, and 33% and 76% for arytenoid cartilage, respectively. The accuracy of recurrent tumor classification was 59.4%. Three carcinomas were over-staged and 10 were under-staged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Myung Woul Han
- Department of Otolaryngology, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Salvage Endoscopic Angiolytic KTP Laser Treatment of Early Glottic Cancer after Failed Radiotherapy. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013; 122:235-9. [DOI: 10.1177/000348941312200404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
46
|
Ho AS, Kraus DH, Ganly I, Lee NY, Shah JP, Morris LGT. Decision making in the management of recurrent head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2013; 36:144-51. [PMID: 23471843 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Revised: 09/22/2012] [Accepted: 11/26/2012] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite substantial improvements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment, the major obstacle to long-term survival remains disease recurrence. Salvage options are often limited due to prior therapy and the escalated morbidity of retreatment. The costs of treatment must be measured against the anticipated quality and quantity of life recovered, even with resectable disease. This review surveys the recurrent HNSCC literature to better guide decision making. Across multiple studies, negative prognostic factors include impaired performance status, advanced recurrent stage, brief disease-free interval, previous chemotherapy, and nonlaryngeal sites of recurrence. When possible, surgical salvage remains the principal option for durable disease control, quality of life preservation, and cure. Nonsurgical therapies have also demonstrated measurable improvements in locoregional control. Interpretation of salvage literature must be tempered by recognition of significant selection bias. The decision for salvage therapy must be individualized, with management that involves well-informed patients resulting in the best outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen S Ho
- Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hong JC, Kim SW, Lee HS, Han YJ, Park HS, Lee KD. Salvage Transoral Laser Supraglottic Laryngectomy after Radiation Failure: A Report of Seven Cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2013; 122:85-90. [PMID: 23534122 DOI: 10.1177/000348941312200203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: We evaluated the oncological and functional outcomes of salvage transoral laser supraglottic laryngectomy after radiation failure. In addition, we demonstrated the usefulness of laser surgery in patients with recurrent supraglottic cancer. Methods: Between December 1999 and May 2011, 7 patients (6 men and 1 woman) underwent transoral laser supraglottic laryngectomy after radiation failure. We conducted 4 different types of endoscopic supraglottic laryngectomy. In the cases with lymph node metastasis, we performed neck dissection at the time of laser surgery. Results: All patients had recurrent squamous cell carcinoma confirmed on the surgical specimen. Two patients were classified as having T1 disease, 2 as having T2 disease, and 3 as having T3 disease with preepiglottic space involvement. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates were 85.7% and 68.6%, respectively. There was a recurrence at 8 months of follow-up after laser surgery in 1 patient; he underwent successful salvage total laryngectomy. The ultimate local control rate was 100%, and the laryngeal preservation rate was 85.7%. The hospitalization times ranged from 2 to 32 days (mean, 15.6 days). The mean decannulation time was 10.7 days (range, 5 to 30 days). All patients started oral feeding within 1 to 3 days after surgery. Conclusions: Salvage transoral laser supraglottic laryngectomy following radiation failure seems a feasible and oncologically safe procedure in recurrent supraglottic cancers ranging from T1 to selected T3 with minimal preepiglottic space involvement. It can be an option for minimally invasive organ preservation surgery with lesser morbidity for recurrent supraglottic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong Chul Hong
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Goessler UR. Traditional transcutaneous approaches in head and neck surgery. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2012; 11:Doc06. [PMID: 23320058 PMCID: PMC3544212 DOI: 10.3205/cto000088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies remains a challenging task for the head and neck surgeon as the chosen treatment modality often has to bridge the gap between oncologically sound radicality and preservation of function. Due to the increase in transoral laser surgery in early tumor stages and chemoradiation in advanced stages, the usage of traditional transcutaneous approaches has decreased over the recent past. In addition, the need for a function-sparing surgical approach as well as highest possible quality of life has become evident. In view of these facts, rationale and importance of traditional transcutaneous approaches to the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies are discussed in a contemporary background. The transcutaneous open partial laryngectomies remain a valuable tool in the surgeon's armamentarium for the treatment of early and advanced laryngeal carcinomas, especially in cases of impossible laryngeal overview using the rigid laryngoscope. Open partial laryngetomies offer superior overview and oncologic safety at the anterior commissure, especially in recurrencies. In select advanced cases and salvage settings, the supracricoid laryngectomy offers a valuable tool for function-preserving but oncologically safe surgical therapy at the cost of high postoperative morbidity and a very demanding rehabilitation of swallowing.In hypopharyngeal malignancies, the increasing use of transoral laser surgery has led to a decline in transcutaneous resections via partial pharyngectomy with partial laryngectomy in early tumor stages. In advanced stages of tumors of the piriform sinus and the postcricoid area with involvement of the larynx, total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy is an oncologically safe approach. The radical surgical approach using circumferent laryngopharyngectomy with/without esophagectomy is indicated in salvage cases with advanced recurrences or as a primary surgical approach in patients where chemoradiation does not offer sufficient oncologic control or preservation of function. In cases with impending reconstruction, fasciocutaneous free flaps (anterolateral thigh flap, radial forearm flap) seem to offer superior results to enteric flaps in cases where the cervical esophagus is not involved leading to better voice rehabilitation with fewer complications and postoperative morbidity. In salvage situations, the Gastroomental Free Flap has proven to be a valuable tool.In conclusion, the choice of a surgical treatment modality is influenced by the patient's anatomy, tumor size and location as well as the surgeon's personal expertise.
Collapse
|
49
|
Amit M, Hilly O, Leider-Trejo L, Popovtzer A, Gutfeld O, Shvero J, Fliss DM, Cohen JT, Bachar G, Gil Z. The role of elective neck dissection in patients undergoing salvage laryngectomy. Head Neck 2012; 35:1392-6. [PMID: 23019150 DOI: 10.1002/hed.23145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2012] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We investigated the risk of neck metastases in patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy in association with previous radiotherapy. METHODS The medical records of 42 patients (51 neck specimens) with clinical N0 classification who underwent salvage total laryngectomy in 2 cancer centers were reviewed. Fourteen patients had previous radiotherapy to the central neck and 28 to the central and lateral neck. RESULTS Staging before salvage total laryngectomy was similar in both groups. The risk of neck metastases in the central and central/lateral radiation groups was 12% and 18%, respectively (p = .69). Subgroup analysis revealed that 4 of 8 patients initially presenting with clinically N+ had neck metastases before surgery, versus 2 of 26 for those with clinically N0 (p = .015; relative risk [RR] = 4.67). The risk or metastases in the contralateral neck was 0 of 9. CONCLUSION The risk of neck metastases in patients who undergo either central or central/lateral neck radiotherapy is similar. Elective neck dissection seems appropriate in patients undergoing SLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moran Amit
- The Laboratory for Applied Cancer Research Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Han YJ, Lee HS, Kim SW, Hong JC, Kim ST, Park HS, Lee KD. Transoral laser microsurgery of recurrent early glottic cancer after radiation therapy: clinical feasibility and limitations. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2012; 121:375-82. [PMID: 22737959 DOI: 10.1177/000348941212100603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) is an accepted alternative to open partial laryngectomy for selected glottic cancers, but its role in salvage of radiation failure is debated. METHODS The records of 18 patients treated by TLM for rT1 and rT2 glottic cancer after curative radiation therapy from 2002 to 2007 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS Of the 18 patients, 10 (56%) remained free of disease after the first TLM. The 5-year local control and laryngeal preservation rates showed better outcomes in rpT1 tumors than in rpT2 tumors (87.5% versus 16.6%, p = 0.02; and 87.5% versus 33.3%, p = 0.03, respectively). However, the 5-year overall survival and disease-specific survival rates showed no significant difference between rpT1 and rpT2 tumors. CONCLUSIONS TLM can be a relatively safe and effective salvage option for rT1 glottic cancer. However, because of its high local recurrence rate, TLM may not be generally recommended for rT2 glottic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Jin Han
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|