Psychometric evaluation of the Swallowing Outcomes After Laryngectomy (SOAL) patient-reported outcome measure

Dysphagia After Total Laryngectomy: An Exploratory Study and Clinical Phase II Rehabilitation Trial with the Novel Swallowing Exercise Aid (SEA 2.0)

The aims of this exploratory study and clinical phase II trial were to assess the specific nature and extent of dysphagia in laryngectomized patients with self-reported dysphagia, and its rehabilitation potential using the novel Swallowing Exercise Aid (SEA 2.0). Twenty laryngectomized patients participated in a six-week exercise program with the SEA 2.0. Exercises consisted of Chin Tuck Against Resistance (CTAR), Jaw Opening Against Resistance (JOAR), and Effortful Swallow Against Resistance, conducted three times per day. Swallowing was assessed at baseline (T0), six (T1) and 14 (T2) weeks, consisting of patient-reported outcomes, BMI, videofluoroscopy, swallowing capacity, and muscle strength measurements. Dysphagia significantly impacts quality of life, with impaired swallowing speed and bolus propulsion as main reported issues. Subjective dysphagia parameters, swallowing capacity, and pharyngeal residue clearance were reduced, but BMI was normal. Muscle and tongue strength were within normal ranges. All participants managed to use the SEA 2.0. Adherence was 95%. At T1, subjective swallowing parameters (MDADI and EAT-10) showed clinically relevant improvements. Objectively, CTAR and JOAR strength increased with 27.4 and 20.1 Newton, respectively. Also, swallowing capacity (from 2.4 g/s to 3.8 g/s) and pharyngeal residue clearance improved. At T2, results were slightly lower than at T1, but still better than at baseline. Dysphagia in laryngectomized patients affects quality of life, but swallowing can be improved with a six-week rehabilitation program using the novel SEA 2.0. Adherence was excellent and several subjective and objective swallowing parameters improved.

Conformity between modified Swallowing Outcome After Laryngectomy questionnaire and Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in laryngeal carcinoma patients after total laryngectomy

BACKGROUND

One of the impacts in anatomic laryngeal and phariyngeal changes after total laryngectomy (TL) is oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). The detection of neopharyngeal residue as a sign of OPD can be performed by videofluoroscopy (VFS) and flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). The availability of these tools in rural areas is still limited, thus the treatment of OPD is not maximal. There is a need for a more practical tool, including the modified swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy (SOAL) questionnaire.

METHODS

This was an analytic observational diagnostic study with a cross-sectional approach. Samples were obtained in Otorhinolaryngology Oncology Clinic and Outpatient Clinic of Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia, who filled SOAL modified questionnaire followed by FEES. Samples were obtained within 3 months from 10 May to 10 August 2021. The number of samples obtained through simple random sampling was 16 post-TL patients from a total population of 17 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The conformity test between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES was analyzed using McNemar comparison test and Kappa association test.

RESULTS

McNemar test showed no significant difference between both assessment tools (p > 0.05), and the Kappa test showed an association between both tools (p < 0.05). The results of this study stated that there was conformity between modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in patients after TL in all types of food bolus had Kappa score of >0.81, showing a reliable association between these tools. Kappa test also showed that out of all three types of boluses, the soft bolus had the highest conformity with a Kappa score of 0.875, followed by thick bolus with 0.839, and watery bolus with 0.818.

CONCLUSION

There was a conformity between the results of the modified SOAL questionnaire and FEES in head and neck surgery patients after TL.

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy (SOAL) Questionnaire for Brazilian Portuguese

PURPOSE

To adapt the Swallow Outcomes After Laryngectomy (SOAL) Questionnaire for the Brazilian culture.

METHOD

Validation study restricted to translation and cross-cultural adaptation. The following steps were taken: discussion of the need for the instrument in the Brazilian context, two independent translations, summary of the translations, analysis by a committee of 12 expert judges in dysphagia and oncology, analysis of the judges' comments and of the content validity indexes of each item and of the questionnaire as a whole, application of the questionnaire in a sample of 10 total laryngectomy patients, back translation and final summary.

RESULTS

It was necessary to perform semantic, syntactic/grammatical, experiential, idiomatic and content equivalences, mainly after the analysis by experts. The content validity indexes of each item and of the questionnaire were acceptable for all evaluated aspects. The back translation was equivalent to the original version. The comparison of the original, translated and back-translated versions indicated that the final version of the instrument was viable.

CONCLUSION

The SOAL was adapted to the Brazilian culture was developed. The validation process will continue using the version presented in this study.

European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To develop a European White Paper document on oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in head and neck cancer (HNC). There are wide variations in the management of OD associated with HNC across Europe.

METHODS

Experts in the management of specific aspects of OD in HNC across Europe were delegated by their professional medical and multidisciplinary societies to contribute to this document. Evidence is based on systematic reviews, consensus-based position statements, and expert opinion.

RESULTS

Twenty-four sections on HNC-specific OD topics.

CONCLUSION

This European White Paper summarizes current best practice on management of OD in HNC, providing recommendations to support patients and health professionals. The body of literature and its level of evidence on diagnostics and treatment for OD in HNC remain poor. This is in the context of an expected increase in the prevalence of OD due to HNC in the near future. Contributing factors to increased prevalence include aging of our European population (including HNC patients) and an increase in human papillomavirus (HPV) related cancer, despite the introduction of HPV vaccination in various countries. We recommend timely implementation of OD screening in HNC patients while emphasizing the need for robust scientific research on the treatment of OD in HNC. Meanwhile, its management remains a challenge for European professional associations and policymakers.

Factors affecting swallowing outcomes after total laryngectomy: Participant self-report using the swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Little is known about what factors affect patient-reported swallowing outcome after total laryngectomy. We explored whether patient demographics, surgical variables, use of adjuvant treatment, and time since surgery were associated with patient-reported swallowing outcome.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study of laryngectomees in eight UK hospitals. Demographic, treatment, and surgical variables were drawn from medical notes. The swallowing outcomes after laryngectomy (SOAL) questionnaire captured perceived swallowing outcome.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty one participants had complete data on treatment-related variables. In regression analysis, having a free jejunum flap repair and requiring chemoradiation were the only two variables that added significantly to the model of worse self-reported swallowing outcome (R² adjusted = .23, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The SOAL is a sensitive measure of self-reported swallowing outcome after laryngectomy. Type of surgical closure and the type of additional treatment influenced the swallowing outcome reported by patients. Changes in perceived swallowing function need to be routinely evaluated to inform clinical decision-making and intervention.

Reliability and validity of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related oropharyngeal dysphagia

PURPOSE

Dysphagia is a symptom associated with significant morbidity and mortality, with profound impact on physical ability and quality of life. Many questionnaires have been used to assess patient-reported dysphagia, but issues related to developmental and measurement properties affect their wide applicability. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10, Greek adaptation) in neurogenic and head and neck cancer-related dysphagia.

METHODS

The study consisted of: item generation in the Greek language, internal consistency and reliability analysis, normative data generation, and validity analysis. Data were collected prospectively from 421 participants: 144 asymptomatic subjects, 146 patients with dysphagia, and 131 patients with dysphagia-related diagnoses. Validity was assessed by comparing scores of healthy and dysphagic participants, by comparing pre- and post-treatment scores, and by correlating the Greek-EAT-10 with fibreoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

RESULTS

The mean participants' age was 52.85 years (ranging from 18 to 85 years). All questionnaires were completed in less than 3 min. The overall internal consistency (assessed with Cronbach's alpha) was 0.963. The test-retest reliability was excellent with Spearman's rho ranging from 0.937 to 1. Dysphagic patients had a significantly higher score compared to healthy participants (p < 0.001). The mean EAT-10 improved significantly after treatment (Wilcoxon signed rank, p < 0.001). The Greek-EAT-10 and FEES scores were significantly correlated (Spearman's rho = 0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

The EAT-10 is a valid, reliable, symptom-specific tool for the assessment of dysphagia, easily self-administered, and practical for clinical use.

The prevalence of dysphonia and dysphagia in patients affected by immunomediated diseases and the role of psychometric tests

This cross-sectional investigation examined the prevalence and severity of dysphonia, globus pharyngeus, and dysphagia in patients affected by immunomediated (IM) diseases. Seventy subjects were administered the Voice Handicap Index (VHI) (scale 0-4), Glasgow-Edinburgh Throat Scale (GETS) (scale from 0 to 7) for globus pharyngeus assessment, and modified Swallowing Outcomes After Revised Laryngectomy (SOAL) (scale 0, 1, 2) to test swallowing symptoms. VHI: the mean percentage of answers with a score greater than 1 (corresponding to a frequency of situation's occurrence "sometimes," "almost always," or "always") was 25.7, 26.7, and 44.1% for functional, emotional, and physical groups of sub-items respectively. GETS: the mean percentage of answers with a score ≥ 3 was 60.85%, significantly higher if compared with that of answers with a score < 3 (40.14%). The mean percentages of answers with a score 0-2, 3-4, and 5-7 were 40.1, 16.7, and 43.7% respectively. SOAL: a mean of 57.9% of answers gained a symptomatic score (1 ["a little"] or 2 ["a lot"]) and 41.9%, the score 0. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The first two most recurrent items with a score 2 ("a lot") were "Do you have a problem swallowing dry food?" (46%) and "Do you have a problem swallowing solid food?" (36%). The study represents the first to describe the globus pharyngeus symptoms in IM population. Moreover, it allows to confirm the recurrence of dysphonia and dysphagia in this type of patients. Particularly, it has been demonstrated that the alteration of swallowing function is related to solid and dry food. The self-assessment questionnaires proved as a useful tool to early detection of dysfunctions in order to avoid further deterioration of quality of life and to prevent serious life-threatening complications.

Patient-reported outcome measures in dysphagia: a systematic review of instrument development and validation

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are commonly used to capture patient experience with dysphagia and to evaluate treatment effectiveness. Inappropriate application can lead to distorted results in clinical studies. A systematic review of the literature on dysphagia-related PRO measures was performed to (1) identify all currently available measures and (2) to evaluate each for the presence of important measurement properties that would affect their applicability.

DESIGN

MEDLINE via the PubMed interface, the Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and the Health and Psychosocial Instrument database were searched using relevant vocabulary terms and key terms related to PRO measures and dysphagia. Three independent investigators performed abstract and full text reviews. Each study meeting criteria was evaluated using an 18-item checklist developed a priori that assessed multiple domains: (1) conceptual model, (2) content validity, (3) reliability, (4) construct validity, (6) scoring and interpretation, and (7) burden and presentation.

RESULTS

Of 4950 abstracts reviewed, a total of 34 dysphagia-related PRO measures (publication year 1987-2014) met criteria for extraction and analysis. Several PRO measures were of high quality (MADS for achalasia, SWAL-QOL and SSQ for oropharyngeal dysphagia, PROMIS-GI for general dysphagia, EORTC-QLQ-OG25 for esophageal cancer, ROMP-swallowing for Parkinson's Disease, DSQ-EoE for eosinophilic esophagitis, and SOAL for total laryngectomy-related dysphagia). In all, 17 met at least one criterion per domain. Thematic deficiencies in current measures were evident including: (1) direct patient involvement in content development, (2) empirically justified dimensionality, (3) demonstrable responsiveness to change, (4) plan for interpreting missing responses, and (5) literacy level assessment.

CONCLUSION

This is the first comprehensive systematic review assessing developmental properties of all available dysphagia-related PRO measures. We identified several instruments with robust measurement properties in multiple diseases including achalasia, oropharyngeal dysphagia, post-surgical dysphagia, esophageal cancer, and dysphagia related to neurological diseases. Findings herein can assist clinicians and researchers in making more informed decisions in selecting the most fundamentally sound PRO measure for a given clinical, research, or quality initiative.