Survival impact of treatment delays in surgically managed oropharyngeal cancer and the role of human papillomavirus status

Can predictive factors determine the time to treatment initiation for oral and oropharyngeal cancer? A classification and regression tree analysis

This ecological study aimed to identify the factors with the greatest power to discriminate the proportion of oral and oropharyngeal cancer (OOC) records with time to treatment initiation (TTI) within 30 days of diagnosis in Brazilian municipalities. A descriptive analysis was performed on the variables grouped into five dimensions related to patient characteristics, access to health services, support for cancer diagnosis, human resources, and socioeconomic characteristics of 3,218 Brazilian municipalities that registered at least one case of OOC in 2019. The Classification and Regression Trees (CART) technique was adopted to identify the explanatory variables with greater discriminatory power for the TTI response variable. There was a higher median percentage of records in the age group of 60 years or older. The median percentage of records with stage III and IV of the disease was 46.97%, and of records with chemotherapy, radiation, or both as the first treatment was 50%. The median percentage of people with private dental and health insurance was low. Up to 75% had no cancer diagnostic support services, and up to 50% of the municipalities had no specialist dentists. Most municipalities (49.4%) started treatment after more than 30 days. In the CART analysis, treatment with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both explained the highest TTI in all municipalities, and it was the most relevant for predicting TTI. The final model also included anatomical sites in the oral cavity and oropharynx and the number of computed tomography services per 100,000. There is a need to expand the availability of oncology services and human resources specialized in diagnosing and treating OOC in Brazilian municipalities for a timely TTI of OOC.

Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT.

DATA SOURCES

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL.

REVIEW METHODS

Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.

The Impact of Delay in Treatment on Survival in Surgically Managed Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma

Background  Sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis, and multimodal therapy is the standard of care. We sought to characterize treatment delays in SNUC managed with surgery and adjuvant radiation and to determine the impact on survival using the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods  This was a retrospective, population-based cohort study of patients with SNUC between 2004 and 2016 in the NCDB. The intervals of diagnosis to surgery (DTS), surgery to radiation (SRT), and radiation duration (RTD) were examined. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to identify the variables with the greatest impact on survival. The association between treatment delay and overall survival (OS) was then assessed using multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression. Results  Of 173 patients who met inclusion criteria, 65.9% were male, average age at diagnosis was 56.6 years, and 5-year OS was 48.1%. Median durations of DTS, SRT, and RTD were 18, 43, and 46 days, respectively. Predictors of treatment delay included Black race, government insurance excluding Medicare/Medicaid, and positive margins. RPA-derived optimal thresholds were 29, 28, and 38 days for DTS, SRT and RTD, respectively. On multivariate analysis, positive margins (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.82; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.28-10.2) and DTS less than 29 days (HR: 2.41; 95% CI: 1.23-4.73) were associated with worse OS. Conclusion  Our results likely reflect the aggressive nature of the disease with surgeons taking more invasive disease to the operating room more quickly. Median treatment intervals described may serve as relevant national benchmarks.

Impact of esthesioneuroblastoma treatment delays on overall patient survival

OBJECTIVES

To characterize clinical factors associated with esthesioneuroblastoma treatment delays and determine the impact of these delays on overall survival.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective database analysis.

METHODS

The 2004-2016 National Cancer Database was queried for patients with esthesioneuroblastoma managed by primary surgery and adjuvant radiation. Durations of diagnosis-to-treatment initiation (DTI), diagnosis-to-treatment end (DTE), surgery-to-RT initiation (SRT), radiotherapy treatment (RTD), and total treatment package (TTP) were analyzed. The cohort was split into two groups for each delay interval using the median time as the threshold.

RESULTS

A total of 814 patients (39.6% female, 88.5% white) with mean ± SD age of 52.6 ± 15.1 years who underwent both esthesioneuroblastoma surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy were queried. Median DTI, DTE, SRT, RTD, and TTP were 34, 140, 55, 45, and 101 days, respectively. A significant association was identified between increased regional radiation dose above 66 Gy and decreased DTI (OR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.35-0.83, p = 0.01) and increased RTD (OR = 3.94, 95% CI 2.36-6.58, p < 0.001) durations. Chemotherapy administration was linked with decreased SRT (OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.89, p = 0.01) and TTP (OR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.43-0.82, p = 0.001) durations. Cox proportional-hazards analysis revealed that increased RTD was associated with decreased survival (HR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.26-2.57, p < 0.005), independent of age, sex, race, regional radiation dose, facility volume, facility type, insurance status, modified Kadish stage, chemotherapy status, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index, and surgical margins.

CONCLUSIONS

Delays during, and prolongation of radiotherapy for esthesioneuroblastoma appears to be associated with decreased survival.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:764-772, 2023.

The Prognostic Impact of Radiotherapy Delays in Oropharynx Carcinoma and the Role of p16 Status

OBJECTIVE

A retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of treatment delays (TDs) for oropharynx carcinoma patients treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT), comparing p16+ versus p16- disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients treated between 2012 and 2016 were analyzed (n=763). TD was defined as the time from pathologic diagnosis to initiation of RT. TD thresholds of ≤60, 61 to 90, and >90 days were used to stratify outcomes. Time on treatment (TOT) delays were estimated based on the RT fractionation. TOT delay of 1 to 3 days was compared with >3 days. Predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS) and locoregional recurrence (LRR) were evaluated on multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Six hundred fifty (85%) patients had p16+ disease. On multivariable analysis, TOT delay of 1 to 3 days versus <1 day was associated with inferior CSS (hazard ratio [HR]=1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-3.22). TD >90 versus ≤60 days (HR=1.68; 95% CI: 0.98-3.04) and 61 to 90 versus ≤60 days (HR=0.94; 95% CI: 0.60-1.48) was not associated with CSS. TD >90 versus ≤60 days (HR=1.29; 95% CI: 0.66-2.52), TD 61 to 90 versus ≤60 days (HR=0.98; 95% CI: 0.64-1.52), TOT 1 to 3 versus <1 day (HR=0.91; 95% CI: 0.39-2.11), and TOT >3 versus <1 day (HR=1.79; 95% CI: 0.80-3.99) were not associated with LRR. There was no interaction between p16 status and TD in relation to LRR (P=0.27) or CSS (P=0.17).

CONCLUSIONS

TDs were not significantly associated with CSS or LRR. TOT of 1 to 3 days was associated with inferior CSS. p16 status should not be a significant factor when triaging RT start dates.

Impact of COVID-19 on presentation, staging, and treatment of head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

During the COVID-19 pandemic, maintenance of safe and timely oncologic care has been challenging. The goal of this study is to compare presenting symptoms, staging, and treatment of head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma during the pandemic with an analogous timeframe one year prior.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary academic center of new adult patients evaluated in a head and neck surgical oncology clinic from March -July 2019 (pre-pandemic control) and March - July 2020 (COVID-19 pandemic).

RESULTS

During the pandemic, the proportion of patients with newly diagnosed malignancies increased by 5%, while the overall number of new patients decreased (n = 575) compared to the control year (n = 776). For patients with mucosal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), median time from referral to initial clinic visit decreased from 11 days (2019) to 8 days (2020) (p = 0.0031). There was no significant difference in total number (p = 0.914) or duration (p = 0.872) of symptoms. During the pandemic, patients were more likely to present with regional nodal metastases (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.846, 95% CI 1.072-3.219, p = 0.028) and more advanced clinical nodal (N) staging (p = 0.011). No significant difference was seen for clinical tumor (T) (p = 0.502) or metastasis (M) staging (p = 0.278). No significant difference in pathologic T (p = 0.665), or N staging (p = 0.907) was found between the two periods.

CONCLUSION

Head and neck mucosal SCC patients presented with more advanced clinical nodal disease during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic despite no change in presenting symptoms.

Social determinants of health and treatment decisions in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

This study compares select social determinants of health (SDOH) with treatment modality selection and treatment completion in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients, to better understand disparities in health outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of HNC (n = 1428) patients was conducted. Demographic and disease-specific variables were recorded, including treatment modality selection and completion. Data were analyzed using two-sample t tests, chi-square, and Fisher's exact tests.

RESULTS

Primary language was significantly associated with treatment choice, where non-English speakers were less likely to choose treatment as recommended by the Tumor Board. Lower mean distance from the hospital (37.38 [48.31] vs. 16.92 [19.10], p < 0.0001) and a county-based higher mean percentage of bachelor degree or higher education (42.16 [8.82] vs. 44.95 [6.19], p < 0.0003) were associated with treatment selection.

CONCLUSION

Language, distance from the hospital, and education affected treatment selection in this study and may be useful in understanding how to counsel patients on treatment selection for HNC.

Impact of Nonadherence to NCCN Adjuvant Radiotherapy Initiation Guidelines in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in an Underserved Urban Population

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to NCCN Guidelines during time from surgery to postoperative radiotherapy (S-PORT) can alter survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinomna (HNSCC). There is a need to validate this impact in an underserved urban population and to understand risk factors and reasons for delay. We sought to investigate the impact of delayed PORT with outcomes of overall survival (OS) in HNSCC, to analyze predictive factors of delayed PORT, and to identify reasons for delay.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in an urban, community-based academic center. A total of 184 patients with primary HNSCC were identified through the Montefiore Medical Center cancer registry who had been treated between March 1, 2005, and March 8, 2017, and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The primary exposure was S-PORT. OS, recurrence, and risk factors and reasons for treatment delay were the main outcomes and measures.

RESULTS

Among 184 patients with HNSCC treated with PORT, the median S-PORT was 48.5 days (interquartile range, 41-67 days). The S-PORT threshold that optimally differentiated worse OS outcomes was >50 days (46.7% of our cohort; n=86). Independent of other relevant factors, patients with HNSCC and S-PORT >50 days had worse OS (hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.34-3.95) and greater recurrence (odds ratio, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.31-9.39). Predictors of delayed S-PORT included being underweight or obese, prolonged postoperative length of stay, and age >70 years. The most frequent reasons for PORT delay were complications related to surgery (22.09%), unrelated medical comorbidities (18.60%), and nonadherence/missed appointments (6.98%).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed PORT beyond 50 days after surgery was associated with decreased OS and greater recurrence. Identification of predictive factors and reasons for treatment delay helps to target at-risk patients and facilitates interventions in underserved populations.

Determinants of delay and association with outcome in head and neck cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Head and neck cancers (HNC) are relatively fast-growing tumours, and delay in treatment initiation is associated with tumour progression and adverse outcome. An overview of factors contributing to delay can provide critical insights on necessary adjustments to optimize care pathways. This systematic review aims to identify factors associated with delay and summarize the effect of delay on oncological outcome measures.

METHODS

A search strategy was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to search electronic databases for studies assessing the carepathway interval (days between first visit in head and neck oncology center and treatment initiation) and/or time-to-treatment-initiation interval (days between histological diagnosis and treatment initiation) and 1) determinants of delay and/or 2) effect of delay on outcome within these timeframes. Due to heterogeneity between included studies, a meta-analysis was not possible.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies were eligible for quantitative analysis. Non-Caucasian race, academic setting, Medicaid/no insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay. Advanced tumour stage was related to increased time-to-treatment initiation in the four common sites combined (oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx). Separate determinants for delay in different tumour locations were identified. In laryngeal, oral cavity cancer and the four common HNC sites combined, delay in start of treatment is associated with decreased overall survival, although no cut-off time point could be determined.

CONCLUSION

Race, facility type, type of insurance and radiotherapy as primary treatment were associated with delay and subsequent inferior survival in the four common sites combined.

Development and validation of a Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN-HN) in a scarce resource setting: Response to the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

In the wake of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, access to surgical care for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) is limited and unpredictable. Determining which patients should be prioritized is inherently subjective and difficult to assess. The authors have proposed an algorithm to fairly and consistently triage patients and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes.

Methods

Two separate expert panels, a consensus panel (11 participants) and a validation panel (15 participants), were constructed among international HNC surgeons. Using a modified Delphi process and RAND Corporation/University of California at Los Angeles methodology with 4 consensus rounds and 2 meetings, groupings of high‐priority, intermediate‐priority, and low‐priority indications for surgery were established and subdivided. A point‐based scoring algorithm was developed, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN). Agreement was measured during consensus and for algorithm scoring using the Krippendorff alpha. Rankings from the algorithm were compared with expert rankings of 12 case vignettes using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient.

Results

A total of 62 indications for surgical priority were rated. Weights for each indication ranged from −4 to +4 (scale range; −17 to 20). The response rate for the validation exercise was 100%. The SPARTAN‐HN demonstrated excellent agreement and correlation with expert rankings (Krippendorff alpha, .91 [95% CI, 0.88‐0.93]; and rho, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.45‐0.95]).

Conclusions

The SPARTAN‐HN surgical prioritization algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring HNC surgical care in the COVID‐19 era. Formal evaluation and implementation are required.

Lay Summary

Many countries have enacted strict rules regarding the use of hospital resources during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. Facing delays in surgery, patients may experience worse functional outcomes, stage migration, and eventual inoperability.

Treatment prioritization tools have shown benefit in helping to triage patients equitably with minimal provider cognitive burden.

The current study sought to develop what to the authors' knowledge is the first cancer–specific surgical prioritization tool for use in the COVID‐19 era, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN). This algorithm consistently stratifies patients requiring head and neck cancer surgery in the COVID‐19 era and provides evidence for the initial uptake of the SPARTAN‐HN.

To the authors' knowledge, the Surgical Prioritization and Ranking Tool and Navigation Aid for Head and Neck Cancer (SPARTAN‐HN) is the first cancer surgery–specific prioritization tool for use during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic. The SPARTAN‐HN algorithm is reliable and valid for the stratification of patients with head and neck cancer who require urgent cancer care in resource‐restricted practice environments.

Framework for prioritizing head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID‐19 pandemic has placed an extraordinary demand on the United States health care system. Many institutions have canceled elective and non‐urgent procedures to conserve resources and limit exposure. While operational definitions of elective and urgent categories exist, there is a degree of surgeon judgment in designation. In the present commentary, we provide a framework for prioritizing head and neck surgery during the pandemic. Unique considerations for the head and neck patient are examined including risk to the oncology patient, outcomes following delay in head and neck cancer therapy, and risk of transmission during otolaryngologic surgery. Our case prioritization criteria consist of four categories: urgent—proceed with surgery, less urgent—consider postpone > 30 days, less urgent—consider postpone 30 to 90 days, and case‐by‐case basis. Finally, we discuss our preoperative clinical pathway for transmission mitigation including defining low‐risk and high‐risk surgery for transmission and role of preoperative COVID‐19 testing.

Heterogeneity in the clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment initiation of p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has a patient demographic, presentation, and clinical treatment response distinct from HPV-unassociated OPSCC. The heterogeneity in presentation and diagnosis within a patient population with HPV-positive OPSCC and its impact on times to presentation, diagnosis, and treatment have yet to be characterized.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with biopsy-proven p16-positive OPSCC seen and/or treated at our institution between 2008 and 2018. Of 136 patients with OPSCC seen and/or treated at our institution, 101 met criteria for inclusion.

METHODS

Patients were grouped by several parameters including presenting symptom category (asymptomatic neck mass, neck mass with primary-site symptoms, or primary-site symptoms without a neck mass), p16 status on fine-needle aspiration (FNA), and date of presentation. Median time intervals between presentation to imaging, biopsy, and treatment were compared within each parameter using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a significance level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Sixty-five of the 101 study patients presented with a neck mass. Patients without a neck mass had a longer interval from presentation to imaging than patients with a neck mass (median 4 vs 0 days, p = 0.025). Initial FNA obtained on 61 patients was positive for p16 in 19 patients. Unknown or negative p16 status on FNA was associated with shorter intervals from initial imaging to treatment initiation (39 vs 46.5 days, p = 0.045). Patients presenting in the final three years had a longer interval from presentation to treatment initiation (55 vs 41 days, p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

A neck mass is absent from the clinical picture of a substantial proportion of HPV-associated OPSCC patients. Primary-site symptom category and regional metastasis were not associated with differences in times to diagnosis or treatment initiation at this major referral center. The increased awareness and complexity of treatment decisions related to OPSCC may contribute to the delays in treatment initiation observed in patients with p16-positive FNAs and those who presented in more recent years.