1
|
Chang YM, Lee CC. Incorporation of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes into an early death prediction model significantly improves net reclassification for outcome estimation in advanced buccal cancer. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2024:S1010-5182(24)00148-3. [PMID: 38729844 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2024.04.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
We explored the impact of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) on the prognostic value of an early death model for advanced buccal cancer. We assessed 121 patients with advanced buccal cancer who underwent primary tumor resection at a medical center. Predictors of early death and 5-year overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox regression models. Performance of models was evaluated with the Harrell C and Akaike information criterion. The net reclassification improvement of the early death model was also calculated relative to the 5-year OS model for one-year all-cause mortality. A total of 121 patients with advanced buccal cancer were recruited. Mean age was 56.1 ± 9.8 years; 117 (96.7%) patients were male. sTILs ≤30%, clinical nodal disease, pathological nodal disease, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, WPOI 5, and no adjuvant radiotherapy were risk factors for early death in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, clinical TNM, sTILs, clinical nodal disease, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and no adjuvant RT were independent factors for early death. sTILs, pathological nodal disease, poor differentiation, lymphovascular invasion, and no adjuvant RT were independent factors for early death in the multivariate model with pathological TNM. The discriminatory ability was better for early death model for 1-year all-cause mortality. Finally, incorporation of sTILs into the early death model increased net reclassification by 21% for the clinical TNM model and 28% for the pathological TNM model. Addition of sTILs improved the early death model, which may help physicians to identify high-risk patients for more intensive treatment and follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Ming Chang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pathology, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| | - Ching-Chih Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; School of Medicine, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Institute of Hospital and Health Care Administration, National Yang Ming Chao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bakas AT, Polinder-Bos HA, Streng F, Mattace-Raso FUS, Ziere G, de Jong RJB, Sewnaik A. Frailty in Non-geriatric Patients With Head and Neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 169:1215-1224. [PMID: 37264978 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) are characterized by a poor lifestyle and comorbidity. The Geriatric 8 (G8) is an established screening tool to identify frail older patients with cancer. However, studies evaluating frailty in younger HNC patients are lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate if the G8 can identify frailty and if it is related to mortality in younger HNC patients. STUDY DESIGN Case-control study design. SETTING Tertiary cancer center. METHODS We studied patients <70 years with HNC. Patients with G8 ≤ 14 were considered frail. Patients were matched to nonfrail (G8 > 14) control patients. Patients were matched according to sex, age, smoking, tumor location, and period of first consultation. Baseline health characteristics were compared between frail patients and nonfrail controls. Second, the treatment plan and adverse outcomes were compared. RESULTS Forty-five patients with G8 ≤ 14 were included and matched to 90 nonfrail controls. The median follow-up time was 357 days. Frail patients had a significantly lower body mass index and level of education, a worse World Health Organization performance status, and reported lower experienced overall health. 28.9% of the frail patients died after 1 year versus 10% of the nonfrail control patients (hazard ratio: 3.87 [95% confidence interval: 1.32-11.36], p = 0.014). CONCLUSION The G8 is a valid screening tool to identify frail patients in younger HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay T Bakas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harmke A Polinder-Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur Streng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gijsbertus Ziere
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob J Baatenburg de Jong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Parsons HM, Forte ML, Abdi HI, Brandt S, Claussen AM, Wilt T, Klein M, Ester E, Landsteiner A, Shaukut A, Sibley SS, Slavin J, Sowerby C, Ng W, Butler M. Nutrition as prevention for improved cancer health outcomes: a systematic literature review. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2023; 7:pkad035. [PMID: 37212631 PMCID: PMC10290234 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkad035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among adults with cancer, malnutrition is associated with decreased treatment completion, more treatment harms and use of health care, and worse short-term survival. To inform the National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention workshop, "Nutrition as Prevention for Improved Cancer Health Outcomes," this systematic review examined the evidence for the effectiveness of providing nutrition interventions before or during cancer therapy to improve outcomes of cancer treatment. METHODS We identified randomized controlled trials enrolling at least 50 participants published from 2000 through July 2022. We provide a detailed evidence map for included studies and grouped studies by broad intervention and cancer types. We conducted risk of bias (RoB) and qualitative descriptions of outcomes for intervention and cancer types with a larger volume of literature. RESULTS From 9798 unique references, 206 randomized controlled trials from 219 publications met the inclusion criteria. Studies primarily focused on nonvitamin or mineral dietary supplements, nutrition support, and route or timing of inpatient nutrition interventions for gastrointestinal or head and neck cancers. Most studies evaluated changes in body weight or composition, adverse events from cancer treatment, length of hospital stay, or quality of life. Few studies were conducted within the United States. Among intervention and cancer types with a high volume of literature (n = 114), 49% (n = 56) were assessed as high RoB. Higher-quality studies (low or medium RoB) reported mixed results on the effect of nutrition interventions across cancer and treatment-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Methodological limitations of nutrition intervention studies surrounding cancer treatment impair translation of findings into clinical practice or guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen M Parsons
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mary L Forte
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Hamdi I Abdi
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Sallee Brandt
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Amy M Claussen
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Timothy Wilt
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Minneapolis VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mark Klein
- School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Adrienne Landsteiner
- Minneapolis VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | | | - Shalamar S Sibley
- School of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Minneapolis VA Healthcare System, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Joanne Slavin
- Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food, Agricultural and Natural Resource Sciences, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | - Catherine Sowerby
- Minneapolis VA Center for Care Delivery and Outcomes Research, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Weiwen Ng
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Mary Butler
- Minnesota Evidence-Based Practice Center, Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matos LL, Sanabria A, Robbins KT, Halmos GB, Strojan P, Ng WT, Takes RP, Angelos P, Piazza C, de Bree R, Ronen O, Guntinas-Lichius O, Eisbruch A, Zafereo M, Mäkitie AA, Shaha AR, Coca-Pelaz A, Rinaldo A, Saba NF, Cohen O, Lopez F, Rodrigo JP, Silver CE, Strandberg TE, Kowalski LP, Ferlito A. Management of Older Patients with Head and Neck Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Adv Ther 2023; 40:1957-1974. [PMID: 36920746 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02460-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023]
Abstract
The projected increase in life expectancy over the next few decades is expected to result in a rise in age-related diseases, including cancer. Head and neck cancer (HNC) is a worldwide health problem with high rates of morbidity and mortality. In this report, we have critically reviewed the literature reporting the management of older patients with HNC. Older adults are more prone to complications and toxicities secondary to HNC treatment, especially those patients who are frail or have comorbidities. Thus, this population should be screened prior to treatment for such predispositions to maximize medical management of comorbidities. Chronologic age itself is not a reason for choosing less intensive treatment for older HNC patients. Whenever possible, also older patients should be treated according to the best standard of care, as nonstandard approaches may result in increased treatment failure rates and mortality. The treatment plan is best established by a multidisciplinary tumor board with shared decision-making with patients and family. Treatment modifications should be considered for those patients who have severe comorbidities, evidence of frailty (low performance status), or low performance status or those who refuse the recommendations of the tumor board.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro L Matos
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), University of São Paulo Medical School, and Faculdade Israelita de Ciências da Saúde Albert Einstein Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alvaro Sanabria
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de Antioquia, Centro de Excelencia en Cirugia de Cabeza y Cuello-CEXCA, Medellin, Colombia
| | - K Thomas Robbins
- Division of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Gyorgy B Halmos
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Primož Strojan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, School of Clinical Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Robert P Takes
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter Angelos
- Department of Surgery and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Surgical and Medical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Remco de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ohad Ronen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Galilee Medical Center, Affiliated with Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel
| | - Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Institute of Phoniatry/Pedaudiology, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Avraham Eisbruch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Mark Zafereo
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antti A Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Research Program in Systems Oncology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ashok R Shaha
- Head and Neck Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andres Coca-Pelaz
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, The Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Oded Cohen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Soroka Medical Center, Israel, Affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Sheva, Israel
| | - Fernando Lopez
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Juan P Rodrigo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, University of Oviedo, ISPA, IUOPA, CIBERONC, Oviedo, Spain
| | - Carl E Silver
- Department of Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Timo E Strandberg
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
- Center for Life-Course Health Research, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | - Luiz Paulo Kowalski
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, University of São Paulo Medical School, Av. Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 255, 8th Floor, Room 8174, São Paulo, SP, CEP: 05403-000, Brazil.
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Otorhinolaryngology, A C Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | - Alfio Ferlito
- Coordinator of the International Head and Neck Scientific Group, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Malnutrition risk and frailty in head and neck cancer patients: coexistent but distinct conditions. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:1893-1902. [PMID: 36484854 PMCID: PMC9988738 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07728-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Both malnutrition and frailty are associated with adverse treatment outcomes. Malnutrition (risk) and frailty are each commonly present in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). However, their coexistence and association is unknown. Main goal of this study is to determine the coexistence of, and the association between malnutrition risk and frailty in patients with HNC. METHODS In this retrospective analysis on prospectively collected data, newly diagnosed patients with HNC, enrolled in the OncoLifeS databiobank were included. The Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) was used to assess malnutrition risk. The Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) was used to assess frailty status. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed, taking into account several patient- and tumor-related factors. RESULTS In total, 197 patients were included. Seventy-six patients (39%) had a medium or high malnutrition risk and 71 patients (36%) were frail. In 38 patients (19%), malnutrition risk coexisted with frailty. Patients with medium and high malnutrition risk were, respectively, 4.0 (95% CI 1.5-11.2) and 13.4 (95% CI 4.0-48.7) times more likely to be frail, compared to patients with low malnutrition risk. In turn, frail patients were 6.4 times (95% CI 2.6-14.9) more likely to have malnutrition risk compared to non-frail patients. CONCLUSIONS Malnutrition risk and frailty frequently coexist but not fully overlap in newly diagnosed patients with HNC. Therefore, screening for both conditions is recommended.
Collapse
|
6
|
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial on impact of comprehensive geriatric and supportive assessment versus standard care in older adults with cancer undergoing curative treatment: The Geriatric Oncology SuPportive clinic for ELderly (GOSPEL) study. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101342. [PMID: 35843845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Cancer affects older adults with varying levels of frailty, but cancer treatment is extrapolated from clinical trials involving predominantly young and robust subjects. Recent geriatric oncology randomised controlled trials (RCT) report that geriatric assessment leading to frailty-guided intervention reduces treatment-related toxicity whilst maintaining survival and improving quality of life (QoL). However, these positive results have not have been consistently reported in the literature. We postulate that the impact of geriatric interventions has been underestimated in these studies with the inclusion of subjects receiving palliative-intent chemotherapy in whom dose reduction is common. Integrating supportive care with current geriatric oncology models may improve the QoL of older adults undergoing treatment. However, no studies as yet have examined such integrated geriatric and supportive models of care. The Geriatric Oncology SuPportive clinic for Elderly (GOSPEL) study is a single-centre, open-label, analyst-blinded RCT evaluating the impact of comprehensive geriatric and supportive care on QoL of older adults with cancer undergoing curative treatment. Older adults aged above 65, with a Geriatric-8 score ≤ 14, with plans for high dose radiotherapy and/or curative chemotherapy will be recruited. The primary QoL outcome is measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-ELD14 mobility scale at 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include overall and disease-free survival, treatment-related adverse events, and hospital admissions. We pre-powered this study to recruit 200 subjects based on the minimally clinically important difference for EORTC QLQ-ELD14 to achieve 80% statistical power (alpha 0.05), assuming 25% attrition. Outcomes will be analysed using intention-to-treat. Intervention consists of multi-domain comprehensive geriatric and supportive care assessments from a multidisciplinary team targeting unmet needs. These include functional decline, falls, incontinence, cognitive impairment, multi-morbidity, polypharmacy, and symptom relief, as well as social and psycho-spiritual concerns. Standard care entails routine oncological management with referral to geriatrics based on the discretion of the primary oncologist. Recruitment has been ongoing since August 2020. Results from the GOSPEL study will increase understanding of the impact of integrated geriatric and supportive care programs in older adults with cancer receiving curative treatment. Trial registration: This study is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov (ID NCT04513977).
Collapse
|
7
|
Banh Chong T, Grosclaude P, Chabrillac E, Lozano S, Vergez S, Mourey L, Dupret-Bories A. Outcomes of comprehensive geriatric assessment and surgical management in head and neck cancers of the elderly: an observational study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:329-338. [PMID: 35857101 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07559-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM The aims of this study were to assess the survival benefit of optimal vs suboptimal management in elderly patients presenting with upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) cancer for which surgery was the standard of care, and determine if comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) was a prognostic factor for survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 2014 to December 2018. Included patients were aged 70 or older at the time of diagnosis, and presented with UADT cancer with a theoretical indication for curative-intent surgery according to international guidelines. RESULTS A total of 188 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years. Treatment included surgery in 67.6% of cases and was considered optimal in 60.6% of patients. The overall 3-year survival was 55.2%, and was significantly better in case of optimal vs suboptimal treatment (74.5% vs 25.8%, p < 0.001). In univariate analysis, factors associated with a significantly improved 3-year survival included surgery (p < 0.001), age < 80 years, performance status < 2 and G8 score > 14. In multivariate analysis, CGA was associated with a better survival. CONCLUSIONS In patients aged over 70 presenting with UADT cancer for which the standard of care is surgery, an optimal management is associated with better overall survival. Receiving a CGA seems to provide a survival benefit in patients with a G8 score ≤ 14, through an optimization of the care pathway before and after the cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thanaphone Banh Chong
- Department of Surgery, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascale Grosclaude
- Tarn Cancer Registry, Claudius Regaud Institute, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France.,CERPOP, UMR 1295 Inserm Toulouse III University, Toulouse, France
| | - Emilien Chabrillac
- Department of Surgery, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France.
| | - Stéphanie Lozano
- Department of Gerontology, Toulouse University Hospital, La Grave Hospital, Place Lange, 31059, Toulouse, France
| | - Sébastien Vergez
- Department of Surgery, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France
| | - Loïc Mourey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Claudius Regaud Institute, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Agnès Dupret-Bories
- Department of Surgery, University Cancer Institute of Toulouse, Oncopole, 1 avenue Irène Joliot-Curie, 31100, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corry J, Ng WT, Ma SJ, Singh AK, de Graeff P, Oosting SF. Disadvantaged Subgroups Within the Global Head and Neck Cancer Population: How Can We Optimize Care? Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-10. [PMID: 35439036 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_359482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Within the global head and neck cancer population, there are subgroups of patients with poorer cancer outcomes independent from tumor characteristics. In this article, we review three such groups. The first group comprises patients with nasopharyngeal cancer in low- and middle-income countries where access to high-volume, well-resourced radiotherapy centers is limited. We discuss a recent study that is aiming to improve outcomes through the instigation of a comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance program. The second group comprises patients with low socioeconomic status in a high-income country who experience substantial financial toxicity, defined as financial hardship for patients due to health care costs. We review causes and consequences of financial toxicity and discuss how it can be mitigated. The third group comprises older patients who may poorly tolerate and not benefit from intensive standard-of-care treatment. We discuss the role of geriatric assessment, particularly in relation to the use of chemotherapy. Through better recognition and understanding of disadvantaged groups within the global head and neck cancer population, we will be better placed to instigate the necessary changes to improve outcomes and quality of life for patients with head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- June Corry
- Division Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Radiation OncologySt Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of MedicineThe University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia
| | - Wai Tong Ng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of MedicineThe University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,Clinical Oncology CentreThe University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Sung Jun Ma
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Anurag K Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Pauline de Graeff
- University Center for Geriatric MedicineUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjoukje F Oosting
- Department of Medical OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Developing a Stacked Ensemble-Based Classification Scheme to Predict Second Primary Cancers in Head and Neck Cancer Survivors. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182312499. [PMID: 34886225 PMCID: PMC8657249 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Despite a considerable expansion in the present therapeutic repertoire for other malignancy managements, mortality from head and neck cancer (HNC) has not significantly improved in recent decades. Moreover, the second primary cancer (SPC) diagnoses increased in patients with HNC, but studies providing evidence to support SPCs prediction in HNC are lacking. Several base classifiers are integrated forming an ensemble meta-classifier using a stacked ensemble method to predict SPCs and find out relevant risk features in patients with HNC. The balanced accuracy and area under the curve (AUC) are over 0.761 and 0.847, with an approximately 2% and 3% increase, respectively, compared to the best individual base classifier. Our study found the top six ensemble risk features, such as body mass index, primary site of HNC, clinical nodal (N) status, primary site surgical margins, sex, and pathologic nodal (N) status. This will help clinicians screen HNC survivors before SPCs occur.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bakas AT, Sewnaik A, van Straaten J, Baatenburg de Jong RJ, Mattace-Raso FUS, Polinder-Bos HA. The Multidimensional Prognostic Index as a Measure of Frailty in Elderly Patients with Head and Neck Cancer. Clin Interv Aging 2021; 16:1679-1689. [PMID: 34556980 PMCID: PMC8453644 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s323740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The multidimensional prognostic index (MPI) is a prognostic model derived from the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) which can predict 1-year mortality risk in elderly individuals. We hypothesized that the MPI also reflects the degree of frailty and thus will correlate with established measures of frailty. Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore whether the MPI-score is a measure of frailty in older head and neck cancer patients and is associated with several physical functioning measurements. Patients and Methods From November 2019 to July 2020, a prospective cohort study enrolled patients with head and neck cancer aged ≥70 years, and patients <70 years with an abnormal G8 score. The MPI-score ranged from 0 to 1 and was categorized in MPI-stage 1 (≤0.33, non-frail); MPI-stage 2 (0.34-0.66, mildly frail), and MPI-stage 3 (≥0.67, severe frail). Pearson's correlation coefficient and multivariable linear regression were used to study the association between MPI-score and the physical functioning measurements handgrip strength, gait speed, and the timed up and go test (TUGT). Results A total of 163 patients were included. One hundred four (63.8%) patients were categorized as non-frail according MPI-stage 1, and 59 (36.2%) patients as mildly or severe frail (n=55 MPI-stage 2; n=4 MPI-stage 3, respectively). A higher MPI-score was significantly associated with lower hand grip strength (B -0.49 [95% CI -0.71; -0.28] p<0.001), lower gait speed (B -0.41 [95% CI -0.55; -0.25] p<0.001), and a slower TUGT (B 0.53 [95% CI 0.66; 0.85] p<0.001). Conclusion Almost one-third of the included patients with head and neck cancer was mild or severe frail. A higher MPI-score, indicating higher degree of frailty, was associated with worse physical performance by lower handgrip strength, gait speed, and a slower TUGT. Thus, the MPI reflects the degree of frailty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ajay T Bakas
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Aniel Sewnaik
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC University Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jaclyn van Straaten
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Francesco U S Mattace-Raso
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Harmke A Polinder-Bos
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Digestion-Specific Acupuncture Effect on Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Post-Operative Oral and Hypopharyngeal Cancer Patients: A Single-Blind Randomized Control Trial. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13062110. [PMID: 34205461 PMCID: PMC8234819 DOI: 10.3390/nu13062110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Malnourishment is prevalent in patients suffering from head and neck cancer. The postoperative period is crucial in terms of nutritional support, especially after composite resection and reconstruction surgery. These patients present with a number of risk factors that aggravate feeding intolerance, including postoperative status, prolonged immobility, decreased head elevation, mechanical ventilation, and applied sedative agents. Routine management protocols for feeding intolerance include prokinetic drug use and post-pyloric tube insertion, which could be both limited and accompanied by detrimental adverse events. This single-blind clinical trial aimed to investigate the effects of acupuncture in postoperative feeding intolerance in critically ill oral and hypopharyngeal cancer patients. Twenty-eight patients were randomized into two groups: Intervention group and Control group. Interventions were administered daily over three consecutive postoperative days. The primary outcome revealed that the intervention group reached 70% and 80% of target energy expenditure (EE) significantly earlier than the control group (4.00 ± 1.22 versus 6.69 ± 3.50 days, p = 0.012), accompanied by higher total calorie intake within the first postoperative week (10263.62 ± 1086.11 kcals versus 8384.69 ± 2120.05 kcals, p = 0.004). Furthermore, the intervention group also needed less of the prokinetic drug (Metoclopramide, 20.77 ± 48.73 mg versus 68.46 ± 66.56 mg, p = 0.010). In conclusion, digestion-specific acupuncture facilitated reduced postoperative feeding intolerance in oral and hypopharyngeal cancer patients.
Collapse
|
12
|
Use of the Geriatric-8 screening tool to predict prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer: A prospective, observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1039-1043. [PMID: 33757718 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To clarify the usefulness of geriatric assessment screening tools for predicting prognosis and complications in older adults with head and neck cancer (HNC). MATERIAL AND METHODS The geriatric-8 (G8) screening tool was administered to 78 older adults with HNC at their first visit to the hospital before any treatments. The ability of the G8 to predict survival was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and determining the cut-off value using Youden's Index. The G8 and other factors related to prognosis (age, performance status (PS), Charlson comorbidity index, number of oral medicines (polypharmacy), the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for biological nutrition status, and treatment intent (curative or palliative)) were validated by Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The survival analysis was validated in a propensity score-weighting cohort to correct for confounding factors. Correlations between these factors and complications were examined using Fishers exact test. RESULTS The G8 cut-off value for overall survival was 10.5 (area under the curve (AUC) 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56-0.82). In the propensity score-weighted cohort, on Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the hazard ratio of an abnormal G8 (<11) was 3.70 [1.59-8.61 (p = 0.002)], and the hazard ratio of PS-abnormal (≥2) was 0.85 [0.09-7.60 (p = 0.88)]. Thirty-day mortality and all-complication rates were significantly higher in the G8-abnormal group. Neither major complications nor transfer to other institutions was correlated with an abnormal G8. CONCLUSION The G8 was a strong prognostic factor and a possible predictor of complications in older adults with HNC.
Collapse
|
13
|
Stromberger C, Yedikat B, Coordes A, Tinhofer I, Kalinauskaite G, Budach V, Zschaeck S, Raguse JD, Kofla G, Heiland M, Stsefanenka A, Beck-Broichsitter B, Dommerich S, Senger C, Beck M. Prognostic Factors Predict Oncological Outcome in Older Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Undergoing Chemoradiation Treatment. Front Oncol 2021; 10:566318. [PMID: 33708616 PMCID: PMC7942196 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.566318] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Older patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) represent a challenging group, as frailty and comorbidities need to be considered. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of curative and palliative (chemo) radiation ([C]RT) with regard to basic geriatric screening in older patients. Methods This study included HNC patients aged ≥70 years who were treated with curative or palliative (C)RT. Clinicopathological data including Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and treatment data were analyzed as predictors of overall survival (OS). Results A total of 271 patients (median age, 74 years) were enrolled. The majority had UICC stage III/IV (90%) and underwent curative treatment (85.2%). A total of 144 (53.1%) patients received definitive and 87 (32.1%) had adjuvant (C)RT. Overall, 40 patients (14.8%) received palliative (C)RT. Median follow-up duration (curative setting) was 87 months, and the 2- and 5-year OS rates were 57.8 and 35.9%, respectively. Median OS was significantly different for age ≤75 vs. >75 years, CCI <6 vs. ≥6, KPS ≥70 vs. <70%, Tx/T1/T2 vs. T3/T4, and adjuvant vs. definitive (C)RT, respectively. Age 70–75 years (p = 0.004), fewer comorbidities when CCI < 6 (p = 0.014), good KPS ≥ 70% (p = 0.001), and adjuvant (C)RT (p = 0.008) independently predicted longer survival. Palliative RT resulted in a median OS of 4 months. Conclusion Older age, lower KPS, higher CCI, and definitive (C)RT are indicators of worse survival in older patients with HNC treated curatively. Without a comprehensive geriatric assessment in patients aged >75 years, the KPS and CCI can be useful tools to account for “fitness, vulnerability or frailty” to help in treatment decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Stromberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Berna Yedikat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Annekatrin Coordes
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Tinhofer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Goda Kalinauskaite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) partner site Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Jan-Dirk Raguse
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Grzegorz Kofla
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Max Heiland
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aksana Stsefanenka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Benedicta Beck-Broichsitter
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Steffen Dommerich
- Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| | - Marcus Beck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
van Holstein Y, van Deudekom FJ, Trompet S, Postmus I, Uit den Boogaard A, van der Elst MJT, de Glas NA, van Heemst D, Labots G, Altena M, Slingerland M, Liefers GJ, van den Bos F, van der Bol JM, Blauw GJ, Portielje JEA, Mooijaart SP. Design and rationale of a routine clinical care pathway and prospective cohort study in older patients needing intensive treatment. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:29. [PMID: 33413165 PMCID: PMC7791733 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-020-01975-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment decisions concerning older patients can be very challenging and individualised treatment plans are often required in this very heterogeneous group. In 2015 we have implemented a routine clinical care pathway for older patients in need of intensive treatment, including a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) that was used to support clinical decision making. An ongoing prospective cohort study, the Triaging Elderly Needing Treatment (TENT) study, has also been initiated in 2016 for participants in this clinical care pathway, to study associations between geriatric characteristics and outcomes of treatment that are relevant to older patients. The aim of this paper is to describe the implementation and rationale of the routine clinical care pathway and design of the TENT study. METHODS A routine clinical care pathway has been designed and implemented in multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged ≥70 years who are candidates for intensive treatments, such as chemotherapy, (chemo-)radiation therapy or major surgery, undergo frailty screening based on the Geriatric 8 (G-8) questionnaire and the Six-Item Cognitive Impairment Test (6CIT). If screening reveals potential frailty, a CGA is performed. All patients are invited to participate in the TENT study. Clinical data and blood samples for biomarker studies are collected at baseline. During follow-up, information about treatment complications, hospitalisations, functional decline, quality of life and mortality is collected. The primary outcome is the composite endpoint of functional decline or mortality at 1 year. DISCUSSION Implementation of a routine clinical care pathway for older patients in need of intensive treatment provides the opportunity to study associations between determinants of frailty and outcomes of treatment. Results of the TENT study will support individualised treatment for future patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study is retrospectively registered at the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR), trial number NL8107 . Date of registration: 22-10-2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yara van Holstein
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Floor J van Deudekom
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stella Trompet
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Iris Postmus
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Uit den Boogaard
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marjan J T van der Elst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Nienke A de Glas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Diana van Heemst
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Labots
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Mariëtte Altena
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit Jan Liefers
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederiek van den Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Gerard J Blauw
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, PO box 9600, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Institute for Evidence-based Medicine in Old Age (IEMO), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nutritional status and interventions for patients with cancer - A systematic review. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:6-21. [PMID: 32616384 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2020] [Accepted: 06/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Malnourishment is commonly seen in ageing, cancer and many chronic conditions, and is associated with poorer prognosis. AIM We set out to collect all currently available evidence on the association between nutritional status assessed with a validated screening tool and prognosis or course of treatment in older patients with cancer, and on the benefit of nutritional interventions in improving these outcomes. METHODS A systematic search in MEDLINE and EMBASE. RESULTS We included 71 studies on the association between nutritional status and outcome in (older) patients with cancer and 17 studies on the benefit of nutritional interventions in improving outcomes in this patient population. There is a significant association between nutritional status and increased intermediate- and long-term mortality (hazard ratio 1.87 (95% confidence interval 1.62-2.17). Those with poorer nutritional status were less likely to complete oncologic treatment according to plan and had higher health care consumption. Benefit of dietary interventions was limited although dietary counselling may lead to improved quality of life while nutritional support may lead to a decrease in post-operative complication rates. CONCLUSION Nutritional status is associated with poorer survival, decreased treatment completion and higher health care consumption and nutritional interventions are only able to negate these negatives outcome to a very limited degree.
Collapse
|
16
|
Torbahn G, Strauss T, Sieber CC, Kiesswetter E, Volkert D. Nutritional status according to the mini nutritional assessment (MNA)® as potential prognostic factor for health and treatment outcomes in patients with cancer - a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:594. [PMID: 32586289 PMCID: PMC7318491 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07052-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with cancer have an increased risk of malnutrition which is associated with poor outcome. The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA®) is often used in older patients with cancer but its relation to outcome is not known. Methods Four databases were systematically searched for studies relating MNA-results with any reported outcome. Two reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full-texts, extracted data and rated the risk of bias (RoB) independently. Results We included 56 studies which varied widely in patient and study characteristics. In multivariable analyses, (risk of) malnutrition assessed by MNA significantly predicts a higher chance for mortality/poor overall survival (22/27 studies), shorter progression-free survival/time to progression (3/5 studies), treatment maintenance (5/8 studies) and (health-related) quality of life (2/2 studies), but not treatment toxicity/complications (1/7 studies) or functional status/decline in (1/3 studies). For other outcomes – length of hospital stay (2 studies), falls, fatigue and unplanned (hospital) admissions (1 study each) – no adjusted results were reported. RoB was rated as moderate to high. Conclusions MNA®-result predicts mortality/survival, cancer progression, treatment maintenance and (health-related) quality of life and did not predict adverse treatment outcomes and functional status/ decline in patients with cancer. For other outcomes results are less clear. The moderate to high RoB calls for studies with better control of potential confounders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Torbahn
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.
| | - T Strauss
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - C C Sieber
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany.,Kantonsspital Winterthur, Brauerstrasse 15, 8400, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - E Kiesswetter
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - D Volkert
- Institute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Kobergerstr. 60, 90408, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
[Head and neck cancer in the elderly-current aspects]. HNO 2020; 68:184-190. [PMID: 31912168 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00792-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The treatment of head and neck cancer is dominated by surgery and radiochemotherapy, which is in part associated with high morbidity. In elderly patients, however, the otorhinolaryngologist often has to question the rationality of invasive treatment. Although the proportion of geriatric patients with head and neck tumors is increasing, the paucity of data means that there are few consistent standards and recommendations in the literature and guidelines. OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper is to provide concrete clinical recommendations for geriatric patients with head and neck tumors based on a systematic literature search. MATERIALS AND METHODS A keyword-based literature search was performed to present the current level of evidence and provide a clinical algorithm. RESULTS In addition to age, the pretreatment dispositional evaluation of geriatric patients should include psychosocial, functional, and medical (patient history) comorbidities. For pretreatment risk stratification, an algorithm was created on the basis of these data for individual evaluation of the patient's pretreatment risk. CONCLUSION Pretreatment risk stratification of geriatric patients with head and neck malignancies is of high relevance for the individual decision for or against invasive treatment, but the currently available evidence is limited. This paper is based on a systematic literature review and provides a clinical algorithm for otorhinolaryngologists and head and neck surgeons.
Collapse
|
18
|
Pavithran K, Srinivasalu V. Does chemoradiotherapy benefit older patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head-and-neck? CANCER RESEARCH, STATISTICS, AND TREATMENT 2020. [DOI: 10.4103/crst.crst_267_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
19
|
Talani C, Mäkitie A, Beran M, Holmberg E, Laurell G, Farnebo L. Early mortality after diagnosis of cancer of the head and neck - A population-based nationwide study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0223154. [PMID: 31577831 PMCID: PMC6774523 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Cancers of the head and neck have a high mortality rate, and roughly 10% of the patients die within six months of diagnosis. To our knowledge little has been written about this group. We wished to identify risk factors for early death, to predict and monitor patients at risk better and, if possible, avoid unjustified major treatment. Methods and findings This population-based nationwide study from the Swedish Head and Neck Cancer Register (SweHNCR) included data from 2008–2015 and 9733 patients at potential risk of early death. A total of 925 (9.5%) patients died within six months. For every year older the patients became, the risk of early death increased by 2.3% (p<0.001). The relative risk of death was 3.37 times higher (237%) for patients with WHO score 1 compared with WHO score 0. A primary tumour in the hypopharynx correlated with a 24% increased risk over the oral cavity (p<0.024). Patients with stage IV disease had a 3.7 times greater risk of early death than those with stage I (p<0.001). As expected, a 12 times increased risk of early death was noted in the palliative treatment group, compared to the curative group. Limitations to this study were that the actual cause of death was not recorded in the SweHNCR, and that socioeconomic factors, alcohol consumption, smoking habits, and HPV status, were not reported in SweHNCR until 2015. However, the fact that this is a population-based nationwide study including 9733 patients compensates for some of these limitations. Conclusions Identification of patients at increased risk of early death shows that older patients with advanced disease, increased WHO score, primary tumour in the hypopharynx, and those given palliative treatment, are more likely than the others to die from head and neck cancer within six months of diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charbél Talani
- Division of Speech language pathology, Audiology and Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology in Linköping, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Antti Mäkitie
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Division of Ear, Nose and Throat Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Research Programme in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martin Beran
- Department of ENT and Maxillofacial Surgery, NAL Medical Center Hospital, Trollhattan, Sweden
| | - Erik Holmberg
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Göran Laurell
- Department of Clinical Sciences, ENT, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Lovisa Farnebo
- Division of Speech language pathology, Audiology and Otorhinolaryngology, Department of Clinical and Experimental medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology in Linköping, Anaesthetics, Operations and Specialty Surgery Center, Region Östergötland, Linköping, Sweden
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van Deudekom FJ, van der Velden LA, Zijl WH, Schimberg AS, Langeveld AP, Slingerland M, Blauw GJ, Mooijaart SP. Geriatric assessment and 1-year mortality in older patients with cancer in the head and neck region: A cohort study. Head Neck 2019; 41:2477-2483. [PMID: 30816619 PMCID: PMC6766841 DOI: 10.1002/hed.25714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim is to describe the association of functional capacity and cognitive functioning with 1‐year mortality in older patients with cancer in the head and neck region. Methods We performed a cohort study in which all patients aged 70 years and older received a geriatric screening before treatment. Main outcome was 1‐year mortality. Results A total of 102 patients were included. Median age was 78.7 years (interquartile range [IQR], 72.3‐84.5), 25% were cognitive impaired, 40% were malnourished, and 28.4% used a walking device. Overall, 1‐year mortality was 42.3%. Male sex (hazard ratio [HR], 4.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.35‐13.67), malnutrition (HR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.19‐5.16), and using a walking device (HR, 2.80; 95% CI 1.13‐6.93) were associated with higher mortality risk, independent of stage and comorbidities. Conclusion In older patients with head and neck cancer, the mortality rates are high. Nutritional status and mobility are determinants of 1‐year mortality, independent of tumor stage, age, and comorbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floor J van Deudekom
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lilly-Ann van der Velden
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Willianne H Zijl
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Anouk S Schimberg
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Anton P Langeveld
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Marije Slingerland
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gerard J Blauw
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Simon P Mooijaart
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Institute for Evidence-based Medicine in Old Age (IEMO), Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|