Long-term outcome in liver transplantation candidates with portopulmonary hypertension

Echocardiographic Screening of Liver Transplant Candidates-Prevalence of Features of Portopulmonary Hypertension

Background: The prevalence of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is relatively low; however, its presence significantly worsens patients' prognosis. When diagnosed, PoPH can be effectively treated, and specific therapies can lead to a substantial reduction in pulmonary circulation pressure, facilitating the safe performance of liver transplantation. Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line method for the non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension and serves as a valuable screening tool for patients being evaluated for liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this study was to thoroughly assess the occurrence of echocardiographic signs indicative of pulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) in candidates for LT. We assumed that our analysis also made it possible to assess how frequently these candidates require further invasive diagnostics for pulmonary hypertension at specialized centers and how often they may need targeted treatment for pulmonary arterioles as a bridge to transplantation, which could improve patient outcomes. Additionally, this study included a comprehensive review of the current literature. Methods: All LT candidates underwent standardized transthoracic echocardiography and contrast evaluation to identify intrapulmonary vascular shunts. Results: A total of 152 liver transplantation candidates (67 women, mean age 50.6 years) were included in the analysis. The estimated echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension was classified as high in only one patient. However, 63 patients exhibited the visualization of microbubbles in the left heart chambers after an average of six cardiac cycles (ranging from three to nine cycles) following their appearance in the right heart. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that the features of PoPH and a high probability of PH were very rare in the LT candidates, and echocardiographic signs suggestive of hepatopulmonary syndrome were more prevalent. Liver transplant candidates need screening for PoPH and HPS, as both PoPH and HPS significantly worsen their prognosis, but specific PH treatment as a bridge to transplantation improves PoPH patients' survival.

Clinical outcomes of upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension

Background

Limited data exists on upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the clinical efficacy, long-term outcomes, and safety of upfront combination therapy in patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study involving a final analysis of 33 consecutive patients diagnosed with portopulmonary hypertension who were taking pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific medication. We compared hemodynamic parameters, risk profiles, composite clinical worsening events, and safety between monotherapy (n = 23) and upfront combination therapy (n = 10).

Results

Twenty-seven patients (82 %) were classified into the Child-Pugh A stage. The change ratios of pulmonary vascular resistance (-32 % vs. -57 %, P = 0.006) were significantly better with upfront combination therapy. Upfront combination therapy also showed significant improvement in risk profiles. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the composite event-free rate was significantly lower in patients who received upfront combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (P = 0.016), although no statistical differences were observed in all-cause death. In the univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, upfront combination therapy was a factor for decreasing composite clinical worsening outcomes (hazard ratio 0.190, 95 % confidence interval 0.042-0.854; P = 0.030). No significant hepatic impairments were observed over 2 years of follow-up in the upfront combination group.

Conclusions

In patients with portopulmonary hypertension, upfront combination therapy significantly improved symptoms and short-term hemodynamics, and reduced long-term clinical worsening events without serious adverse effects. This study's findings suggest that patients with portopulmonary hypertension presenting with mild hepatic impairment benefit from upfront combination therapy.

Risk stratification refinements with inclusion of haemodynamic variables at follow-up in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Haemodynamic variables are prognostic factors in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, right heart catheterisation (RHC) is not systematically recommended to assess the risk status during follow-up. This study aimed to assess the added value of haemodynamic variables in prevalent patients to predict the risk of death or lung transplantation according to their risk status assessed by the non-invasive four-strata model as recommended by the European guidelines.

METHODS

We evaluated incident patients with PAH enrolled in the French pulmonary hypertension registry between 2009 and 2020 who had a first follow-up RHC. Cox regression identified, in each follow-up risk status, haemodynamic variables significantly associated with transplant-free survival. Optimal thresholds were determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics. Several multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the haemodynamic variables improving the non-invasive risk stratification model.

RESULTS

We analysed 1240 incident patients reassessed within 1 year by RHC. None of the haemodynamic variables were significantly associated with transplant-free survival among low-risk (n=386) or high-risk (n=71) patients. Among patients at intermediate (intermediate-low, n=483 and intermediate-high, n=300) risk at first follow-up, multivariable models including either stroke volume index (SVI) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (S vO2 ) were the best. The prognostic performance of a refined six-strata risk stratification model including the non-invasive four-strata model and SVI >37 mL·m-2 and/or S vO2 >65% for patients at intermediate risk (area under the curve (AUC) 0.81; c-index 0.74) was better than that of the four-strata model (AUC 0.79, p=0.009; c-index 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics may improve risk stratification at follow-up in patients at intermediate risk.

Hemodynamic and Clinical Response to Liver Transplantation in Children and Young Adults POPH Patients

Portopulmonary hypertension is an intractable form of pulmonary hypertension. Although liver transplantation is recommended for patients who respond poorly to treatments, the mechanisms by which liver transplantation improves pulmonary hypertension remain unclear. The present study investigated these mechanisms by retrospectively evaluating patients' data. This study retrospectively evaluated echocardiography and catheterization data before and after liver transplantation in 12 patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2001 to 2019. The 12 patients included one male and 11 females, of median age at liver transplantation of 10 years, 2 months. Nine patients underwent liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia and three for portal vein aplasia or hypoplasia. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 44.1 ± 8.1 mmHg at the first cardiac catheter examination, 35.3 ± 7.8 mmHg before liver transplantation, and 29.5 ± 9.3 mmHg 6 months after liver transplantation. Pulmonary artery pressure was reduced by treatments of pulmonary hypertension and by liver transplantation. Pulmonary vascular resistance did not differ before and after liver transplantation, whereas the cardiac index decreased significantly, indicating that the significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure was due to a decrease in cardiac index. Decreased cardiac index was thought to result from improvements in hyperdynamic conditions due to increased (normalized) systemic vascular resistance. Liver transplantation likely suppresses shear stress on pulmonary arteries, preventing further damage by hyper-circulation. A longer-term evaluation is required to determine the effect of improving pulmonary artery remodeling.

Portopulmonary hypertension: peculiarities of diagnosis and treatment

Portopulmonary hypertension is defined as the development of pulmonary hypertension secondary to portal one. Its exact prevalence is difficult to determine due to the lack of routine screening in patients with portal hypertension. Hemodynamic changes associated with portal hypertension, including the hyperdynamic state, portosystemic shunts, and splanchnic vasodilation, cause significant disturbances in the pulmonary vasculature and play a key role in the pathogenesis of the disease. Without treatment, portopulmonary hypertension leads to progressive right ventricular failure with a poor prognosis. Although Doppler echocardiography is the best initial screening tool for symptomatic patients and candidates for liver transplant, right heart catheterization remains the gold standard for disease diagnosis. Treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension is aimed at improving cardiac function, reducing pulmonary vascular resistance, and optimizing functional capacity. Pulmonary hypertension-specific therapy, which includes prostacyclin and its receptor agonists, endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, and guanylate cyclase stimulators, plays a key role in the treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension. Small uncontrolled and recent single randomized controlled trials have reported promising results of vasodilator therapy in terms of clinical and hemodynamic improvement in patients, allowing certain patients to undergo liver transplantation. This review discusses the epidemiology, approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with portopulmonary hypertension. We used MEDLINE database on the PubMed platform and the Cochrane library to search for literature sources using the keywords: portopulmonary hypertension, portal hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, liver cirrhosis, pulmonary complications.

The Clinical Course of Portopulmonary Hypertension and Outcomes With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Treatment: Observational Study of Data From the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network

Background

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) occurs in patients with advanced liver disease and can be a contraindication to liver transplant (LT). Improvement of hemodynamic parameters with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies (including endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs]) may help some patients to become eligible for LT.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis to describe the clinical course and management of PoPH in patients on a US registry LT waitlist and outcomes in patients receiving an ERA.

Results

At the time of LT waitlist entry (1996-2019), patient characteristics and disease severity were similar in the 685 patients with PoPH enrolled overall (LT waitlist data set) and the 420 of them who underwent LT (LT data set). Most patients (92.0%) had a model for end-stage liver disease exception granted before entering the LT waitlist. Patients spent a median of 8.9 mo (interquartile range, 3.7-19.7) on the LT waitlist before undergoing LT. Overall, 77.1% of patients received PAH treatment at LT waitlist entry (ERAs, 30.1%). Hemodynamic parameters improved in ≥95% of patients between the first assessment versus the second (median interval, 9 mo) and last assessments (median interval, 14 mo). At the first assessment, 49.6% of patients had mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥45 mm Hg versus 2.6% and 1.8% of patients at the second and last assessments, respectively; 47.5% of patients had pulmonary vascular resistance >450 dynes·s/cm5 versus 0.9% and 0.2% of patients at the second and last assessments. One-year survival was 90.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.6-92.9) following LT waitlist entry and was 86.4% (95% CI, 82.6-89.5) after LT; 5-y survival was 67.4% (95% CI, 60.0-73.8) while on the LT waitlist (before LT) and was 75.6% (95% CI, 70.4-80.0) following LT.

Conclusions

This large US study of patients with PoPH on an LT waitlist confirms that effective PAH treatments can help patients achieve acceptable hemodynamics, providing the opportunity to undergo LT.

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies

INTRODUCTION

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a worse prognosis than other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Data regarding use of PAH-specific therapies in patients with PoPH are sparse as they are usually excluded from clinical trials. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles in patients with PoPH newly initiating macitentan in the USA using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset.

METHODS

OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020); OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review (October 2013-March 2017). Additional information regarding patients' liver disease was retrospectively collected for patients with PoPH in OPUS.

RESULTS

The OPUS/OrPHeUS dataset included 206 patients with PoPH (median age 58 years; 52.4% female), with baseline cirrhosis and liver test abnormalities reported in 72.8% and 31.6% of patients respectively. Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 74.8% of patients and median (Q1, Q3) exposure to macitentan was 11.9 (3.1, 26.0) months. One-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence limit, CL) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization and survival were 48.6% (40.7, 56.0) and 82.2% (75.1, 87.4). Of the 96 patients with PoPH in OPUS, 29.2% were classified as in need of liver transplant due to underlying liver disease during the study; transplant waitlist registration was precluded because of PAH severity for 32.1% and 17.9% were transplanted. Hepatic adverse events (HAE) were experienced by 49.0% of patients; the most common being increased bilirubin (16.0%), ascites (7.3%), and hepatic encephalopathy (5.8%); 1.5% and 21.8% of patients discontinued macitentan as a result of HAE and non-hepatic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

There were no unexpected safety findings in patients with PoPH treated with macitentan. These data add to the evidence supporting the safety and tolerability of macitentan in patients with PoPH. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; OPsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov .

Expert management of congenital portosystemic shunts and their complications

Congenital portosystemic shunts are often associated with systemic complications, the most challenging of which are liver nodules, pulmonary hypertension, endocrine abnormalities, and neurocognitive dysfunction. In the present paper, we offer expert clinical guidance on the management of liver nodules, pulmonary hypertension, and endocrine abnormalities, and we make recommendations regarding shunt closure and follow-up.

[Pulmonary Complications in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis]

Portal hypertension is a clinical syndrome defined by an increased portal venous pressure. The most frequent cause of portal hypertension is liver cirrhosis, and many of the complications of cirrhosis, such as ascites and gastroesophageal variceal bleeding, are related to portal hypertension. Portal hypertension is a pathological condition caused by the accumulation of blood flow in the portal system. This blood flow retention reduces the effective circulation volume. To compensate for these changes, neurotransmitter hormone changes and metabolic abnormalities occur, which cause complications in organs other than the liver. A hepatic hydrothorax is fluid accumulation in the pleural space resulting from increased portal pressure. Hepatopulmonary syndrome and portopulmonary hypertension are the pulmonary complications in cirrhosis by deforming the vascular structure. Symptoms, such as dyspnea and hypoxia, affect the survival and the quality of life of patients. These lung complications are usually underestimated in the management of cirrhosis. This review briefly introduces the type of lung complications of cirrhosis.

When Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension may be Associated with Portal Hypertension: A Case Report of Two Different Hepatic Disorders in One Patient with Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare complication of hepatic diseases with portal hypertension that, however, has a significant influence on prognosis. We present a mini-review of how to diagnose and treat it based on a clinical case.

CASE PRESENTATION

in early childhood, a patient had portal hypertension associated with cavernous transformation of the portal vein. It was successfully treated by reno-splenic surgery. At the age of 20 years, this patient experienced increased dyspnea at minimal physical activity after the hepatic biopsy due to a hepatocellular adenoma. The examination in the specialized unit showed PAH, which was evaluated as associated with portal hypertension (PAH-PoH). The specific two-drug combination therapy was started with prominent improvement in patient's state. Successful surgical tumor treatment was provided some months later. The practical and clinical approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of PAH-PoH are discussed. It was emphasized that not all patients with portal hypertension have pulmonary hypertension, which needs to be treated. A lot of evidence gaps exist in management of these patients.

CONCLUSION

all patients, even with past history of portal hypertension, should be monitored closely and screened for PAH earlier, for better results of treatment.

Is pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with schistosomiasis distinct from pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with schistosomiasis (SchPAH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension (PoPAH) are lung diseases that develop in the presence of liver diseases. However, mechanistic pathways by which the underlying liver conditions and other drivers contribute to the development and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are unclear for both etiologies. In turn, these unknowns limit certainty of strategies to prevent, diagnose, and reverse the resultant PAH. Here we consider specific mechanisms that contribute to SchPAH and PoPAH, identifying those that may be shared and those that appear to be unique to each etiology, in the hope that this exploration will both highlight known causal drivers and identify knowledge gaps appropriate for future research. Overall, the key pathophysiologic differences that we identify between SchPAH and PoPAH suggest that they are not variants of a single condition.

Pulmonary Assessment of the Liver Transplant Recipient

Respiratory symptoms and hypoxemia can complicate chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. Various pulmonary disorders affecting the pleura, lung parenchyma, and pulmonary vasculature are seen in end-stage liver disease, complicating liver transplantation (LT). Approximately 8% of cirrhotic patients in an intensive care unit develop severe pulmonary problems. These disorders affect waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes. A thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests help diagnose and assess the severity to risk stratify pulmonary diseases before LT. Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) are respiratory consequences specific to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. HPS is seen in 5-30% of cirrhosis cases and is characterized by impaired oxygenation due to intrapulmonary vascular dilatations and arteriovenous shunts. Severe HPS is an indication of LT. The majority of patients with HPS resolve their hypoxemia after LT. When pulmonary arterial hypertension occurs in patients with portal hypertension, it is called POPH. All other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension should be ruled out before labeling as POPH. Since severe POPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] >50 mm Hg) is a relative contraindication for LT, it is crucial to screen for POPH before LT. Those with moderate POPH (mPAP >35 mm Hg), who improve with medical therapy, will benefit from LT. A transudative pleural effusion called hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is seen in 5-10% of people with cirrhosis. Refractory cases of HH benefit from LT. In recent years, increasing clinical expertise and advances in the medical field have resulted in better outcomes in patients with moderate to severe pulmonary disorders, who undergo LT.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: An Updated Review

Portal hypertension may have major consequences on the pulmonary vasculature due to the complex pathophysiological interactions between the liver and lungs. Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), a subset of group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a serious pulmonary vascular disease secondary to portal hypertension, and is the fourth most common subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension. It is most commonly observed in cirrhotic patients; however, patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension can also develop it. On suspicion of PoPH, the initial evaluation is by a transthoracic echocardiogram in which, if elevated pulmonary pressures are shown, patients should undergo right heart catheterization to confirm the diagnosis. The prognosis is extremely poor in untreated patients; therefore, management includes pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies with the aim of improving pulmonary hemodynamics and moving patients to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this article, we review in detail the epidemiology, pathophysiology, process for diagnosis, and most current treatments including OLT and prognosis in patients with PoPH. In addition, we present a diagnostic algorithm that includes the current criteria to properly select patients with PoPH who are candidates for OLT.

Portopulmonary hypertension practice patterns after liver transplantation

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is a type of pulmonary arterial hypertension occurring exclusively in those with portal hypertensive liver disease. Liver transplantation (LT) can significantly improve outcomes. Current guidelines counsel against immediate adjustments to targeted therapy after LT and suggest routine echocardiography as sufficiently informative to guide therapeutic adjustments. Current practice patterns for adjusting targeted therapy after LT in POPH, and how they compare with guidelines, are not well established. To answer this question, we performed an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional mixed-methods survey-based study of US POPH providers. Anonymized requests to complete the survey were sent through professional networks between January 20, 2022, and April 20, 2022. Responses were compared between cardiologists and pulmonologists using Fisher's exact tests, at a significance of 0.05. A total of 85 POPH physicians were included in the final analysis (66% pulmonologists and 34% cardiologists). Following LT, the majority of respondents routinely used a combination of standard cardiopulmonary assessment modalities to guide adjustment of targeted therapy following LT. Most respondents (69%) started by adjusting parenteral prostacyclins with small titrations and frequent reassessments within 3 months of LT, but some (19.7%) adjusted targeted therapy immediately after LT. Our results showed that the majority of respondents favored serial integrated cardiopulmonary testing (including routine right heart catheterization) to guide the adjustment of targeted therapy in POPH after LT, and almost one-fifth of respondents weaned therapy immediately after LT. Our study demonstrates heterogeneity in POPH practice patterns after LT, highlights differences between current practice patterns and the most recent guidelines, emphasizes the need for additional research, and supports a team-based approach to standardize care for these high-risk patients and optimize post-LT outcomes.

The correlation in echocardiogram to right heart catheterization in identifying pulmonary hypertension as a barrier to liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) can be limitations towards listing for liver transplantation (LT). Our study evaluates the correlation of right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) and mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) on transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) compared to mPAP on right heart catheterization (RHC).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 723 patients who underwent LT evaluation at our institution between 2012 and 2020. Our cohort consisted of patients with RVSP and mPAP measured on TTE. A Wald t-test and area under the curve analysis were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

Patients with higher mPAP values on TTE (N=33) did not correlate with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC, while patients with higher RVSP values (N=147) on TTE were associated with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC. The cutoff value of RVSP ≥ 48 mmHg on TTE was associated with mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that RVSP compared to mPAP on TTE is a better indicator for mPAP ≥ 35 mmHg on RHC. RVSP can be used as a marker on echocardiography for identifying patients with a higher likelihood of PH being a barrier to LT listing.

Portopulmonary Hypertension

PoPH is a well-recognized complication of portal hypertension with or without cirrhosis and is classified as a subset of PAH. Identification of PoPH is crucial as it has a major impact on prognosis and liver transplant candidacy. Echocardiogram is the initial screening tool of choice and the patient should proceed to RHC for confirmation. PAH-directed therapy is the treatment of choice, allowing the patient to achieve a hemodynamic threshold to undergo a liver transplant safely.

Significance of a multidisciplinary approach to congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt: A changing paradigm for the treatment

AIM

To review the current institutional practice to treat patients with congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) and to determine the optimal strategy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 55 patients diagnosed with CEPS at our center between December 2008 and March 2022.

RESULTS

Among these 55 patients, 44 (80.0%) received treatment for CEPS at a median age of 4.7 years. The most common indication for treatment was cardiopulmonary complications (45.5%). Therapeutic intervention included shunt closure by endovascular techniques (50.0%) or surgery (40.9%), and liver transplantation (9.1%). A total of 11 were classified as short shunt types, and surgical ligation was performed in all to preserve the major vascular system and prevent complications (p < 0.001). Children who received a surgical ligation were more likely to develop complications after shunt closure (p = 0.02). Among seven patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), one patient, who received a shunt ligation at <1 year-of-age, was only able to completely discontinue medication. Most other CEPS-related complications were completely resolved. Post-treatment complications, including thrombosis and symptoms of portal hypertension, were seen in 16 patients. After shunt closure, one patient was scheduled to undergo liver transplantation for progressive POPH and large residual hepatocellular adenoma. During follow-up, one patient without any treatment for CEPS developed POPH 16 years from the diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Earlier therapeutic interventions should be strongly considered for patients with POPH related to CEPS. However, in view of the invasiveness and treatment complications, special attention should be paid to the management of patients with short shunt types.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: Management and Liver Transplantation Evaluation

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) affects 5% to 6% of patients with advanced liver disease and accounts for 5% to 15% of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) cases. Compared with idiopathic PAH, POPH is associated with significantly worse survival. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the role of both PAH therapy and liver transplantation (LT) in the management of POPH and their impact on overall prognosis. We performed a review of the published literature to summarize the available evidence and guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of POPH. POPH is defined by the presence of precapillary PH in the context of portal hypertension. POPH is associated with increased perioperative risk at the time of LT, which can be stratified by mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Screening with echocardiography is recommended in all LT candidates to facilitate detection and treatment of POPH. Despite a paucity of evidence, POPH is treated similarly to idiopathic PAH with PAH therapy. These therapies are associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and facilitation of safe LT. LT can result in improvement or resolution of POPH in half of patients and has been associated with improved survival in highly selected patients. The prognosis in POPH is poor and is impacted by the severity of both PH and liver disease. Management with a combination of PAH therapy and LT in selected patients has been associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and survival.

Struggling Between Liver Transplantation and Portopulmonary Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a progressive, ultimately fatal cardiopulmonary disease that occurs exclusively in patients with underlying portal hypertensive liver disease. PoPH outcomes are driven by both the severity of underlying liver disease and the degree of cardiac adaptation to elevated pulmonary pressures. The mainstay of treatment in PoPH is targeted pulmonary vascular therapy. Liver transplantation (LT) can be beneficial in some patients, but is associated with considerable risks in the PoPH population, and outcomes are variable. The optimal management strategy for PoPH, LT, or medical therapy alone, is unclear, and further research is needed to help guide clinical decision-making.

Portopulmonary Hypertension in Nontransplanted Patients: Results of the Largest US Single-Institution Registry

OBJECTIVE

To explore clinical characteristics, risk profiles, and outcomes of patients with portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) who have contraindications to liver transplant (LT).

METHODS

From the largest US single-institution registry of patients with PoPH, we analyzed 160 patients who did not receive LT between 1988 to 2019. Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-pertinent characteristics, hemodynamic features, treatments, and risk stratification were compared at baseline, first follow-up visit, and censor/death time.

RESULTS

Median survival for the entire cohort was 27.5 months from the diagnosis of PoPH. Overall survival was 89%, 77%, 51%, and 38% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, and 5 years, respectively. Survival was significantly affected by the severity of liver disease (P<.001). Most patients received PAH-specific therapies (136 [85%]), predominantly monotherapy (123 [77%)]. With treatment, significant improvements were noted in World Health Organization functional class (P=.04), 6-minute walk distance (P<.001), right ventricular function (P<.001), pulmonary vascular resistance (P<.001), and Registry to Evaluate Early and Long-term Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Disease Management (REVEAL) Lite 2 score (P=.02) univariately. Per European Society of Cardiology risk stratification, no patient met full criteria for low risk at baseline or at follow-up. In a multivariate Cox risk model, 6-minute walk distance, right atrial pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, bilirubin level, and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease-sodium score of 15 or higher were associated with increased risk of death.

CONCLUSION

Patients with PoPH who did not undergo LT had a poor prognosis. This persisted despite use of PAH-specific therapies and significant improvements in hemodynamics, echocardiography parameters of right ventricle function, 6-minute walk distance, and World Health Organization functional class.

Efficacy evaluation of pulmonary hypertension therapy in patients with portal pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To determine the therapeutic effect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) agents for portal pulmonary hypertension (POPH).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: POPH is a serious complication of end-stage liver disease with a low survival rate. Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment. Due to the presence of POPH, some patients cannot undergo LT. After PAH treatment, patients with POPH can obtain good hemodynamics and cardiac function for LT, but there are no standard guidelines.

Methods: Two independent researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from inception to 27 September 2022, focusing on the changes in hemodynamics and cardiac function in all patients with POPH to understand the effect of PAH treatment on the entire population of POPH patients. Among these, we specifically analyzed the changes in hemodynamics and cardiac function in moderate and severe POPH patients. After collecting the relevant data, a meta-analysis was carried out using the R program meta-package.

Results: A total of 2,775 literatures were retrieved, and 24 literatures were included. The results showed that in all POPH patients (n = 1,046), the following indicators were significantly improved with PAH agents: mPAP: (MD = −9.11 mmHg, p &lt; 0.0001); PVR: (MD = −239.33 dyn·s·cm−5, p &lt; 0.0001); CO: (MD = 1.71 L/min, p &lt; 0.0001); cardiac index: (MD = 0.87 L/(min·m2), p &lt; 0.0001); 6MWD: (MD = 43.41 m, p &lt; 0.0001). In patients with moderate to severe POPH (n = 235), the following indicators improved significantly with PAH agents: mPAP (MD = −9.63 mmHg, p &lt; 0.0001); PVR (MD = −259.78 dyn·s·cm−5, p &lt; 0.0001); CO (MD = 1.76 L/min, p &lt; 0.0001); Cardiac index: (MD = 1.01 L/(min·m2), p = 0.0027); 6MWD: (MD = 61.30 m, p &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusion: The application of PAH agents can improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with POPH, especially in patients with moderate to severe POPH, and the above changes are more positive.

Systematic Review Registration:https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202250034.

Mending the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease: An in-depth review of the past, present, and future portopulmonary hypertension Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exception

Patients with portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) have an increased cardiovascular and overall mortality risk when undergoing liver transplantation (LT). However, such risk is not captured in their Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) laboratory score. POPH MELD exception criteria were established in 2006 with the aim of prioritizing these patients for LT prior to pulmonary hypertension (PH) progression and eventual right heart failure. The original criteria emphasized a posttreatment, pre-LT mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) of <35 mm Hg and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <400 dynes-s-cm^-5 or <5 Wood units (WU). Since 2006, there have been important advances in the treatment of POPH with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies and newer evidence regarding LT outcomes and risk factors for perioperative mortality. Specifically, PVR rather than mPAP has been shown to be more strongly associated with outcomes, including mortality. In addition, among treated patients with POPH, mPAP may be persistently elevated related to an elevated cardiac output or other factors that do not necessarily reflect POPH disease severity. Thus, in February 2021, the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network approved proposed modifications to POPH MELD exception criteria, now allowing either of the following posttreatment, pre-LT hemodynamic profiles: mPAP less than 35 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 400 dynes-s-cm^-5 (or less than 5 WU) or mPAP greater than or equal to 35 mm Hg and less than 45 mm Hg and posttreatment PVR less than 240 dynes-s-cm^-5 (or less than 3 WU). This article reviews the history of the POPH MELD exception criteria, describes the recent modifications to the exception criteria and the evidence supporting them, and highlights unanswered questions and areas for future research.

Porto-pulmonary arterial hypertension: Translation of pathophysiological concepts to the bedside

Porto-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PoPAH) is a form of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that affects patients with cirrhosis, and - to a lesser extent - patients with non-cirrhotic liver diseases. Compared with other forms of PAH, PoPAH is more prevalent in male, in older subjects, and is characterized by lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and lower pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with higher cardiac output. Despite more favorable hemodynamics and functional class, patients with PoPAH have a significantly worse survival than patients with other forms of PAH, likely because of liver-related events and therapeutic barriers to PAH-specific therapy. Furthermore, here cardiopulmonary and hepatic complications may affect treatment efficacy. These patients have been excluded from most randomized clinical trials testing PAH-specific treatments. To date, there is only one study investigating efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PAH-specific therapy in patients with PoPAH in a randomized placebo-controlled setting. In this trial the use of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist macitentan showed clear hemodynamic benefit without safety concerns. However, the drug effects on functional capacity and mortality remain unclear. Here we review the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and management of PoPAH and report a case vignette of a patient with PoPAH due to hepatorenal polycystic disease.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: A Review of the Current Literature

Portopulmonary hypertension is defined as the development of pulmonary arterial hypertension in the setting of portal hypertension with or without liver cirrhosis. Portal hypertension-associated haemodynamic changes, including hyperdynamic state, portosystemic shunts and splanchnic vasodilation, induce significant alterations in pulmonary vascular bed and play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of the disease. If left untreated, portopulmonary hypertension results in progressive right heart failure, with a poor prognosis. Although Doppler echocardiography is the best initial screening tool for symptomatic patients and liver transplantation candidates, right heart catheterisation remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of the disease. Severe portopulmonary hypertension exerts a prohibitive risk to liver transplantation by conferring an elevated perioperative mortality risk. It is important for haemodynamic parameters to correspond with non-severe portopulmonary hypertension before patients can proceed with the liver transplantation. Small uncontrolled studies and a recent randomised controlled trial have reported promising results with vasodilatory therapies in clinical and haemodynamic improvement of patients, allowing a proportion of patients to undergo liver transplantation. In this review, the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic approach and management of portopulmonary hypertension are discussed. We also highlight fields of ongoing investigation pertinent to risk stratification and optimal patient selection to maximise long-term benefit from currently available treatments.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the impact of pre-existing and new-onset atrial fibrillation on outcomes before and after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Atrial Fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly diagnosed cardiac arrhythmia. It is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, as it is a major risk factor for cerebral vascular accidents (CVA). Our aim was to determine the prevalence of pre-existing and new-onset AF among patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) and its impact on post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched. Single-arm analysis was conducted using the generalized linear mixed model to determine the prevalence of pre-existing and new-onset AF. Logistic regression was performed to analyze risk factors. Comparative meta-analysis in odds ratio was conducted for binary outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty articles were included, with 17 studies on pre-existing AF, and 7 including data on new-onset AF post-LT. The prevalence of pre-existing AF was 3.3% (CI 2.3-4.7) (14 studies, 45,070 patients) in pooled analysis. Significantly higher prevalence of pre-existing AF patients from North America was noted when compared to Europe (4.5%, CI 3.4-5.8 vs 1.5%, CI 0.8-2.7; p = 0.001). Body mass index (BMI), history of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) were risk factors for pre-existing AF. Pre-existing AF was significantly associated with major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) postoperatively (OR 8.02, 95%CI 5.40-11.90, p < 0.001). New-onset AF post-LT had an incidence of 6.8% (CI 4.9-9.3), and was associated with increased risk of mortality (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.76-3.02, p < 0.001) and graft failure (OR 2.98, CI 1.99-4.47, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

AF is relatively more common among patients undergoing LT compared to the general non-transplant population. Additionally, it is associated with adverse outcomes including MACCE, thus warranting clinical attention. Thorough cardiac assessment, and close surveillance of post-operative AF may be clinically prudent.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a subtype of pulmonary hypertension (PH), characterized by pulmonary arterial remodeling. The prevalence of PAH is approximately 10.6 cases per 1 million adults in the US. Untreated, PAH progresses to right heart failure and death.

OBSERVATIONS

Pulmonary hypertension is defined by a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg and is classified into 5 clinical groups based on etiology, pathophysiology, and treatment. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is 1 of the 5 groups of PH and is hemodynamically defined by right heart catheterization demonstrating a mean pulmonary artery pressure greater than 20 mm Hg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of 15 mm Hg or lower, and a pulmonary vascular resistance of 3 Wood units or greater. Pulmonary arterial hypertension is further divided into subgroups based on underlying etiology, consisting of idiopathic PAH, heritable PAH, drug- and toxin-associated PAH, pulmonary veno-occlusive disease, PAH in long-term responders to calcium channel blockers, and persistent PH of the newborn, as well as PAH associated with other medical conditions including connective tissue disease, HIV, and congenital heart disease. Early presenting symptoms are nonspecific and typically consist of dyspnea on exertion and fatigue. Currently approved therapy for PAH consists of drugs that enhance the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate biological pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, or riociguat), prostacyclin pathway agonists (epoprostenol or treprostinil), and endothelin pathway antagonists (bosentan and ambrisentan). With these PAH-specific therapies, 5-year survival has improved from 34% in 1991 to more than 60% in 2015. Current treatment consists of combination drug therapy that targets more than 1 biological pathway, such as the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate and endothelin pathways (eg, ambrisentan and tadalafil), and has shown demonstrable improvement in morbidity and mortality compared with the previous conventional single-pathway targeted monotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Pulmonary arterial hypertension affects an estimated 10.6 per 1 million adults in the US and, without treatment, typically progresses to right heart failure and death. First-line therapy with drug combinations that target multiple biological pathways are associated with improved survival.

ERS International Congress 2021: highlights from the Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Assembly

This article aims to summarise the latest research presented at the virtual 2021 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress in the field of pulmonary vascular disease. In light of the current guidelines and proceedings, knowledge gaps are addressed and the newest findings of the various forms of pulmonary hypertension as well as key points on pulmonary embolism are discussed. Despite the comprehensive coverage of the guidelines for pulmonary embolism at previous conferences, discussions about controversies in the diagnosis and treatment of this condition in specific cases were debated and are addressed in the first section of this article. We then report on an interesting pro-con debate about the current classification of pulmonary hypertension. We further report on presentations on Group 3 pulmonary hypertension, with research exploring pathogenesis, phenotyping, diagnosis and treatment; important contributions on the diagnosis of post-capillary pulmonary hypertension are also included. Finally, we summarise the latest evidence presented on pulmonary vascular disease and COVID-19 and a statement on the new imaging guidelines for pulmonary vascular disease from the Fleischner Society.

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance Predicts Mortality and Graft Failure in Transplantation Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is a pulmonary vascular disease associated with significant morbidity and mortality in those with liver disease, conferring a higher mortality in patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). Although not a transplant indication, patients with POPH can experience significant clinical improvement following LT, and those maintaining a mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP) <35mm Hg and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) <5 Woods units (WU) are granted additional listing points to expedite LT. The effect of POPH on posttransplant outcomes such as mortality and graft failure, however, is not well defined. We performed a retrospective cohort study of the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database of all adult patients who underwent LT between January 1, 2006, and December 1, 2020. Using adjusted accelerated failure time models, we examined the relationship between a diagnosis of POPH and outcomes following LT and the relationship between pre-LT hemodynamics and post-LT survival (alive with a functioning graft) in patients with POPH. Compared with those undergoing transplants without exception points, patients with POPH had comparable post-LT survival rates but were significantly more likely to have graft failure. Both pre-LT MPAP and PVR predicted post-LT survival in POPH, with a pre-LT PVR of ≥1.6 WU, more than doubling the hazard for mortality (death or a nonfunctioning graft; coefficient, 2.01; standard error, 0.85; hazard ratio, 2.21; P = 0.02). POPH may confer a significantly higher risk of post-LT graft failure compared with patients with cirrhosis without POPH, and a pre-LT PVR of ≥1.6 WU may predict post-LT survival. Further investigation into the relationship between pre-LT hemodynamics, right ventricular function, and post-LT outcomes of mortality and graft failure in POPH is needed.

Causes and Circumstances of Death in Portopulmonary Hypertension

The causes and circumstances surrounding death are poorly studied in patients with portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH). We sought to determine the specific reasons for dying and characteristics surrounding this process in patients with PoPH.

Outcomes of Liver Transplantation in Treated Portopulmonary Hypertension Patients With a Mean Pulmonary Arterial Pressure ≥35 mm Hg

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that develops in the setting of portal hypertension, affects 5%–6% of patients with liver disease and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. A mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) threshold of 35 mm Hg is used to stratify perioperative risk and liver transplant eligibility in treated POPH patients but does not take into account the specific factors that contribute to the pressure elevation.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: From Bench to Bedside

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is defined as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) associated with portal hypertension and is a subset of Group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH). PoPH is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality in patients with portal hypertension with or without liver disease. Significant strides in elucidating the pathogenesis, effective screening algorithms, accurate diagnoses, and treatment options have been made in past 20 years. Survival of PoPH has remained poor compared to IPAH and other forms of PAH. Recently, the first randomized controlled trial was done in this patient population and showed promising results with PAH specific therapy. Despite positive effects on hemodynamics and functional outcomes, it is unclear whether PAH specific therapy has a beneficial effect on long term survival or transplant outcomes. In this review, we will discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical and hemodynamic characteristics of PoPH. Additionally, this review will highlight the lacunae in our current management strategy, challenges faced and will provide direction to potentially useful futuristic management strategies.

Vasomodulators and Liver Transplantation for Portopulmonary Hypertension: Evidence From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Untreated portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a poor prognosis. Previous reports have described vasomodulator (VM) therapy and liver transplantation (LT) as treatment options. We aimed to provide summary estimates on the endpoints of pulmonary hemodynamics and survival in patients with PoPH, treated with different modalities.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of mainly observational and case-control studies describing no treatment, VM, LT, or VM + LT in patients with PoPH. Twenty-six studies (1,019 patients) were included. Both VM and VM + LT improve pulmonary hemodynamics. A substantial proportion of patients treated with VM become eligible for LT (44%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31-58). Pooled estimates for 1-, and 3-year postdiagnosis survival in patients treated with VM were 86% (95% CI, 81-90) and 69% (95% CI, 50-84) versus 82% (95% CI, 52-95) and 67% (95% CI, 53-78) in patients treated with VM + LT. Of note, studies reporting on the effect of VM mainly included Child-Pugh A/B patients, whereas studies reporting on VM + LT mainly included Child-Pugh B/C. Seven studies (238 patients) included both patients who received VM only and patients who received VM + LT. Risk of death in VM-only-treated patients was significantly higher than in patients who could be transplanted as well (odds ratio, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.4-8.8); however, importantly, patients who proceeded to transplant had been selected very strictly. In 50% of patients, VM can be discontinued post-LT (95% CI, 38-62).

CONCLUSIONS

VM and VM + LT both improve pulmonary hemodynamics and prognosis in PoPH. In a strictly selected subpopulation of cases where LT is indicated based on severe liver disease and where LT is considered safe and feasible, treatment with VM + LT confers a better prognosis. Considering successful VM, 44% can proceed to LT, with half being able to postoperatively stop medication.

Prevalence and characteristics of portopulmonary hypertension in cirrhotic patients who underwent both hepatic vein and pulmonary artery catheterization

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a well-known complication of liver cirrhosis. The aim of this study was to clarify the pulmonary hemodynamics and the prevalence and characteristics of PoPH in patients with portal hypertension.

METHODS

The subjects were 335 patients with portal hypertension diagnosed by hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG). Among them, 186 patients received measurements of pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). PoPH was diagnosed by PAP >20 mmHg, PVR ≥3 Wood units (WU) and PAWP ≤15 mmHg.

RESULTS

The Child-Pugh classification was class A in 53, B in 92 and C in 41 patients. Median (range) values of HVPG, PAP, PVR and PAWP were 18.4 (5.5-39.0) mmHg, 12.9 (6.6-40.8) mmHg, 0.8 (0.1-4.5) WU and 7.5 (2.2-15.4) mmHg, respectively. Of six patients with PAP >20 mmHg, four had autoimmune hepatitis or primary biliary cholangitis, with the prevalence being significantly higher than that in patients with PAP ≤20 mmHg. Meanwhile, no significant difference was noted in the hepatic functional reserve or HVPG between patients with PAP >20 mmHg and ≤20 mmHg. Only two patients met the diagnostic criteria of PoPH and both patients were Child-Pugh B. The Child-Pugh score and HVPG were not associated with PoPH.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that only two patients were complicated by PoPH. High PAP values were noted in patients with primary biliary cholangitis or autoimmune hepatitis. However, the presence of PoPH and high PAP were not associated with the degree of hepatic functional reserve or HVPG.

Clinical Outcomes after Liver Transplantation in Patients with Portopulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is the presence of pulmonary arterial (PA) hypertension in patients with portal hypertension and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In a cohort of POPH patients, we describe the clinical outcomes of POPH patients who underwent liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

Retrospectively collected data from a prospectively assembled cohort of all consecutive POPH adults evaluated in three transplant centers from 1996 to 2019.

RESULTS

From a cohort of 228 POPH patients, 50 patients underwent LT. Significant hemodynamic improvement after PA-targeted therapy was observed, with 58% receiving only monotherapy pre-transplant. After LT, 21 (42%) patients were able to discontinue and remained off PA-targeted therapy. The 1, 3, and 5 year unadjusted survival rates after LT were 72%, 63% and 60%, respectively. An elevated pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) before LT was associated with worse survival rate (HR 1.91, 95% CI 1.07-3.74, p=0.04). No survival difference was observed in those granted MELD exception or transplants performed before or after the year 2010.

CONCLUSION

Significant number of POPH patients discontinued PA-targeted therapy after LT. Higher PVR before LT was associated with worse survival, as was monotherapy use. Despite effective PA-targeted therapies, POPH survival outcomes after LT in our cohort were modest and may reflect the need for more aggressive therapy.

Portopulmonary hypertension in the current era of pulmonary hypertension management

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Long-term outcomes in portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) are poorly studied in the current era of pulmonary hypertension management. We analysed the effect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH)-targeted therapies, survival and predictors of death in a large contemporary cohort of patients with PoPH.

METHODS

Data from patients with PoPH consecutively enrolled in the French Pulmonary Hypertension Registry between 2007 and 2017 were collected. The effect of initial treatment strategies on functional class, exercise capacity and cardiopulmonary haemodynamics were analysed. Survival and its association with PAH- and hepatic-related characteristics were also examined.

RESULTS

Six hundred and thirty-seven patients (mean age 55 ± 10 years; 58% male) were included. Fifty-seven percent had mild cirrhosis, i.e. Child-Pugh stage A. The median model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was 11 (IQR 9-15). Most patients (n = 474; 74%) were initiated on monotherapy, either with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (n = 336) or with an endothelin-receptor antagonist (n = 128); 95 (15%) were initiated on double oral combination therapy and 5 (1%) on triple therapy. After a median treatment time of 4.5 months, there were significant improvements in functional class (p <0.001), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) (p <0.0001) and pulmonary vascular resistance (p <0.0001). Overall survival rates were 84%, 69% and 51% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively. Baseline 6MWD, sex, age and MELD score or Child-Pugh stage were identified as independent prognostic factors. Survival from PoPH diagnosis was significantly better in the subgroup of patients who underwent liver transplantation (92%, 83% and 81% at 1, 3 and 5 years, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Survival of patients with PoPH is strongly associated with the severity of liver disease. Patients who underwent liver transplantation had the best long-term outcomes.

LAY SUMMARY

Portopulmonary hypertension is defined by the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension in the context of chronic liver disease and is characterized by progressive shortness of breath and exercise limitation. The presence of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension in liver transplant candidates represents a contraindication for such a surgery; however, treatments targeting pulmonary arterial hypertension are efficacious, allowing for safe transplantation and conferring good survival outcomes in those who undergo liver transplantation.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters and Acute Kidney Injury After Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Acute kidney injury (AKI) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is associated with increased mortality. We sought to identify associations between intraoperative hemodynamic variables and postoperative AKI.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 734 cases of LDLT. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables of systemic and pulmonary arterial pressure, central venous pressure (CVP), and pulmonary artery catheter-derived parameters including mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2), right ventricular end-diastolic volume (RVEDV), stroke volume, systemic vascular resistance, right ventricular ejection fraction, and stroke work index were collected. Propensity score matching analysis was performed between patients with (n = 265) and without (n = 265) postoperative AKI. Hemodynamic variables were compared between patients with AKI, defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria, and those without AKI in the matched sample.

RESULTS

The incidence of AKI was 36.1% (265/734). Baseline CVP, baseline RVEDV, and SvO2 at 5 minutes before reperfusion were significantly different between patients with and without AKI in the matched sample of 265 pairs. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline CVP, baseline RVEDV, and SvO2 at 5 minutes before reperfusion were independent predictors of AKI (CVP per 5 cm H2O increase: odds ratio [OR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-1.32; SvO2: OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.27-1.71; RVEDV: OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78).

CONCLUSIONS

The elevated baseline CVP, elevated baseline RVEDV after anesthesia induction, and decreased SvO2 during anhepatic phase were associated with postoperative AKI. Prospective trials are required to evaluate whether the optimization of these variables may decrease the risk of AKI after LDLT.

Hepatopulmonary Syndrome and Portopulmonary Hypertension: Management in Liver Transplantation in the Horizon 2020

Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) is characterized by intrapulmonary microvasculature dilatation that causes intrapulmonary shunting and leads to a gas exchange abnormality in the presence of liver diseases, which is the most common cause of respiratory insufficiency in these patients. HPS doubles the risk of death, and liver transplantation (LT) is the only curative therapeutic option so it should be considered in patients with severe HPS, with excellent survival rates post-LT. However, pretransplant Pao₂ <45 mm Hg has been associated with an increase in post-transplant morbidity and mortality, but it does not imply a contraindication for LT. The resolution of HPS usually occurs within 6 months post-LT, but it can take 1 year. Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is defined as pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that develops in the setting of portal hypertension with or without liver disease in the absence of other causes of PAH. The prevalence of PoPH is 5% to 10% among liver transplant (LT) candidates. The impact of LT on PoPH is unpredictable. Therefore, despite conferring a high morbidity and mortality, PoPH itself is not an indication for liver transplantation. It may be considered a contraindication for LT in severe cases.