Modeling Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1a Liver Disease in Mice by Somatic CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9-Mediated Gene Editing

Lipid Nanoparticles Optimized for Targeting and Release of Nucleic Acid

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are currently the most promising clinical nucleic acids drug delivery vehicles. LNPs prevent the degradation of cargo nucleic acids during blood circulation. Upon entry into the cell, specific components of the lipid nanoparticles can promote the endosomal escape of nucleic acids. These are the basic properties of lipid nanoparticles as nucleic acid carriers. As LNPs exhibit hepatic aggregation characteristics, enhancing targeting out of the liver is a crucial way to improve LNPs administrated in vivo. Meanwhile, endosomal escape of nucleic acids loaded in LNPs is often considered inadequate, and therefore, much effort is devoted to enhancing the intracellular release efficiency of nucleic acids. Here, different strategies to efficiently deliver nucleic acid delivery from LNPs are concluded and their mechanisms are investigated. In addition, based on the information on LNPs that are in clinical trials or have completed clinical trials, the issues that are necessary to be approached in the clinical translation of LNPs are discussed, which it is hoped will shed light on the development of LNP nucleic acid drugs.

Hepatic ChREBP orchestrates intrahepatic carbohydrate metabolism to limit hepatic glucose 6-phosphate and glycogen accumulation in a mouse model for acute Glycogen Storage Disease type Ib

OBJECTIVE

Carbohydrate Response Element Binding Protein (ChREBP) is a glucose 6-phosphate (G6P)-sensitive transcription factor that acts as a metabolic switch to maintain intracellular glucose and phosphate homeostasis. Hepatic ChREBP is well-known for its regulatory role in glycolysis, the pentose phosphate pathway, and de novo lipogenesis. The physiological role of ChREBP in hepatic glycogen metabolism and blood glucose regulation has not been assessed in detail, and ChREBP's contribution to carbohydrate flux adaptations in hepatic Glycogen Storage Disease type 1 (GSD I) requires further investigation.

METHODS

The current study aimed to investigate the role of ChREBP as a regulator of glycogen metabolism in response to hepatic G6P accumulation, using a model for acute hepatic GSD type Ib. The immediate biochemical and regulatory responses to hepatic G6P accumulation were evaluated upon G6P transporter inhibition by the chlorogenic acid S4048 in mice that were either treated with a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) directed against ChREBP (shChREBP) or a scrambled shRNA (shSCR). Complementary stable isotope experiments were performed to quantify hepatic carbohydrate fluxes in vivo.

RESULTS

ShChREBP treatment normalized the S4048-mediated induction of hepatic ChREBP target genes to levels observed in vehicle- and shSCR-treated controls. In parallel, hepatic shChREBP treatment in S4048-infused mice resulted in a more pronounced accumulation of hepatic glycogen and further reduction of blood glucose levels compared to shSCR treatment. Hepatic ChREBP knockdown modestly increased glucokinase (GCK) flux in S4048-treated mice while it enhanced UDP-glucose turnover as well as glycogen synthase and phosphorylase fluxes. Hepatic GCK mRNA and protein levels were induced by shChREBP treatment in both vehicle- and S4048-treated mice, while glycogen synthase 2 (GYS2) and glycogen phosphorylase (PYGL) mRNA and protein levels were reduced. Finally, knockdown of hepatic ChREBP expression reduced starch domain binding protein 1 (STBD1) mRNA and protein levels while it inhibited acid alpha-glucosidase (GAA) activity, suggesting reduced capacity for lysosomal glycogen breakdown.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that ChREBP activation controls hepatic glycogen and blood glucose levels in acute hepatic GSD Ib through concomitant regulation of glucose phosphorylation, glycogenesis, and glycogenolysis. ChREBP-mediated control of GCK enzyme levels aligns with corresponding adaptations in GCK flux. In contrast, ChREBP activation in response to acute hepatic GSD Ib exerts opposite effects on GYS2/PYGL enzyme levels and their corresponding fluxes, indicating that GYS2/PYGL expression levels are not limiting to their respective fluxes under these conditions.

Old age as a risk factor for liver diseases: Modern therapeutic approaches

Recent scientific interest has been directed towards age-related diseases, driven by the significant increase in global life expectancy and the growing population of individuals aged 65 and above. The ageing process encompasses various biological, physiological, environmental, psychological, behavioural, and social changes, leading to an augmented susceptibility to chronic illnesses. Cardiovascular, neurological, musculoskeletal, liver and oncological diseases are prevalent in the elderly. Moreover, ageing individuals demonstrate reduced regenerative capacity and decreased tolerance towards therapeutic interventions, including organ transplantation. Liver diseases, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, hepatitis, fibrosis, and cirrhosis, have emerged as significant public health concerns. Paradoxically, these conditions remain underestimated despite their substantial global impact. Age-related factors are closely associated with the severity and unfavorable prognosis of various liver diseases, warranting further investigation to enhance clinical management and develop novel therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review focuses specifically on age-related liver diseases, their treatment strategies, and contemporary practices. It provides a detailed account of the global burden, types, molecular mechanisms, and epigenetic alterations underlying these liver pathologies.

Glycogen storage disease type I: Genetic etiology, clinical manifestations, and conventional and gene therapies

Glycogen storage disease type I (GSDI) is an inherited metabolic disorder characterized by a deficiency of enzymes or proteins involved in glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis, resulting in excessive intracellular glycogen accumulation. While GSDI is classified into four different subtypes based on molecular genetic variants, GSDIa accounts for approximately 80%. GSDIa and GSDIb are autosomal recessive disorders caused by deficiencies in glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase-α) and glucose-6-phosphate-transporter (G6PT), respectively. For the past 50 years, the care of patients with GSDI has been improved following elaborate dietary managements. GSDI patients currently receive dietary therapies that enable patients to improve hypoglycemia and alleviate early symptomatic signs of the disease. However, dietary therapies have many limitations with a risk of calcium, vitamin D, and iron deficiency and cannot prevent long-term complications, such as progressive liver and renal failure. With the deepening understanding of the pathogenesis of GSDI and the development of gene therapy technology, there is great progress in the treatment of GSDI. Here, we review the underlying molecular genetics and the current clinical management strategies of GSDI patients with an emphasis on promising experimental gene therapies.

Mitochondrial reprogramming in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with glycogen storage disease type Ia

BACKGROUND

Glycogen storage disease type Ia (GSDIa) is an inborn metabolic disorder caused by the deficiency of glucose-6-phospatase-α (G6Pase-α) leading to mitochondrial dysfunction. It remains unclear whether mitochondrial dysfunction is present in patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and whether dietary treatment can play a role. The aim of this study was to investigate mitochondrial function in PBMC of GSDIa patients.

METHODS

Ten GSDIa patients and 10 age-, sex- and fasting-time matched controls were enrolled. Expression of genes involved in mitochondrial function and activity of key fatty acid oxidation (FAO) and Krebs cycle proteins were assessed in PBMC. Targeted metabolomics and assessment of metabolic control markers were also performed.

RESULTS

Adult GSDIa patients showed increased CPT1A, SDHB, TFAM, mTOR expression (p < 0.05) and increased VLCAD, CPT2 and citrate synthase activity in PBMC (p < 0.05). VLCAD activity directly correlated with WC (p < 0.01), BMI (p < 0.05), serum malonycarnitine levels (p < 0.05). CPT2 activity directly correlated with BMI (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Mitochondrial reprogramming is detectable in PBMC of GSDIa patients. This feature may develop as an adaptation to the liver enzyme defect and may be triggered by dietary (over)treatment in the frame of G6Pase-α deficiency. PBMC can represent an adequate mean to assess (diet-induced) metabolic disturbances in GSDIa.

Urine-Derived Epithelial Cells as a New Model to Study Renal Metabolic Phenotypes of Patients with Glycogen Storage Disease 1a

Glycogen storage diseases (GSDs) represent a model of pathological accumulation of glycogen disease in the kidney that, in animal models, results in nephropathy due to abnormal autophagy and mitochondrial function. Patients with Glycogen Storage Disease 1a (GSD1a) accumulate glycogen in the kidneys and suffer a disease resembling diabetic nephropathy that can progress to renal failure. In this study, we addressed whether urine-derived epithelial cells (URECs) from patients with GSD1a maintain their biological features, and whether they can be used as a model to study the renal and metabolic phenotypes of this genetic condition. Studies were performed on cells extracted from urine samples of GSD1a and healthy subjects. URECs were characterized after the fourth passage by transmission electron microscopy and immunofluorescence. Reactive oxygen species (ROS), at different glucose concentrations, were measured by fluorescent staining. We cultured URECs from three patients with GSD1a and three healthy controls. At the fourth passage, URECs from GSD1a patients maintained their massive glycogen content. GSD1a and control cells showed the ciliary structures of renal tubular epithelium and the expression of epithelial (E-cadherin) and renal tubular cells (aquaporin 1 and 2) markers. Moreover, URECs from both groups responded to changes in glucose concentrations by modulating ROS levels. GSD1a cells were featured by a specific response to the low glucose stimulus, which is the condition that more resembles the metabolic derangement of patients with GSD1a. Through this study, we demonstrated that URECs might represent a promising experimental model to study the molecular mechanisms leading to renal damage in GSD1a, due to pathological glycogen storage.

Studies on glycogen storage disease type 1a animal models: a brief perspective

Glycogen storage disease type 1 (GSD1) is a rare hereditary monogenic disease characterized by the disturbed glucose metabolism. The most widespread variant of GSD1 is GSD1a, which is a deficiency of glucose-6-phosphatase-ɑ. Glucose-6-phosphatase-ɑ is expressed only in liver, kidney, and intestine, and these organs are primarily affected by its deficiency, and long-term complications of GSD1a include hepatic tumors and chronic liver disease. This article is a brief overview of existing animal models for GSD1a, from the first mouse model of 1996 to modern CRISPR/Cas9-generated ones. First whole-body murine models demonstrated exact metabolic symptoms of GSD1a, but the animals did not survive weaning. The protocol for glucose treatment allowed prolonged survival of affected animals, but long-term complications, such as hepatic tumorigenesis, could not be investigated. Next, organ-specific knockout models were developed, and most of the metabolic research was performed on liver glucose-6-phosphate-deficient mice. Naturally occuring mutation was also discovered in dogs. All these models are widely used to study GSD1a from metabolic and physiological standpoints and to develop possible treatments involving gene therapy. Research performed using these models helped elucidate the role of glycogen and lipid accumulation, hypoxia, mitochondrial dysfunction, and autophagy impairment in long-term complications of GSD1a, including hepatic tumorigenesis. Recently, gene replacement therapy and genome editing were tested on described models, and some of the developed approaches have reached clinical trials.