Quantification of serum hepatitis C virus RNA

Hepatitis B vaccine efficacy in patients with chronic liver disease by hepatitis C virus

BACKGROUND

Considering the immunosuppression of patients with chronic liver disease, their response to vaccination is discussed in literature.

AIMS

To evaluate the response of hepatitis B vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.

METHODS

This is a prospective study in which 85 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection (46.8 +/- 9.4 years, 44.7% males) and 46 healthy adults (36.7 +/- 11.1 years; 39.1% males) were evaluated. Confirmation of hepatitis C virus was obtained by the technique of polymerase chain reaction. Viral load was determined by the branched DNA method in 74 patients, and genotype was determined by sequencing in 73 patients. All patients and healthy adults received three doses of Engerix B vaccine IM (at 0, 30 and 180 days). Serological responses to the vaccine were divided into three categories: seroprotection, when anti-HBs was > or =100 mUI/mL; seroconversion, when anti-HBs was 10-99 mUI/mL, and non-reagent, when anti-HBs was <10 mUI/mL.

RESULTS

The response of hepatitis B vaccine as determined 1 month following dose 3 was seroprotection in 37.7%, seroconversion in 17.6% and non-reagent in 44.7% among patients and 84.8%, 13.0%, 2.2%, respectively in healthy adults. The number of non-reagent responses was significantly higher among those patients with chronic liver disease. Sixty-five patients with chronic hepatitis were compared to 20 compensated cirrhotic patients in concern to the response to vaccine, but no difference was found. The response to vaccine in patients with genotypes 2 or 3 (n = 40) was better than in those with genotype 1 (n = 33). Response was not related to serum HCV-RNA concentration.

CONCLUSION

The number of non-responders was higher in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection, irrespective of histological status and viral load. It is suggested that such patients should receive a double dose of vaccine, particularly the ones with genotype 1.

Hepatitis C virus-specific cytolytic T cell responses after antiviral therapy

Antigen-specific T cells are likely to provide a critical defense against hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, their detection in blood is uncommon except in persons who undergo spontaneous recovery after acute HCV infection. We postulated that virological responses after antiviral interferon-alpha therapy may be associated with enhanced cytolytic T cell immunity. Peripheral blood memory CTL responses were quantified using short term limiting dilution culture, with cytolytic function detected by standard chromium release assay. In this cross-sectional study, 5 of 11 interferon-alpha or interferon-alpha plus ribavirin-treated subjects exhibited cytolytic T cell responses after therapy completion; 4 of these 5 subjects were HCV RNA negative at the time of assay. In contrast, only 1 of 9 untreated chronically viremic subjects had detectable HCV-specific cytolytic T cell responses. Although the requisite factors necessary to achieve sustained virologic response after therapy remain largely undefined, the findings presented here suggest that antiviral therapy-induced virological clearance may be associated with the induction, expansion, and/or recirculation of HCV antigen-specific cytolytic T cells, and may play a role in the maintenance of a nonviremic state.

Evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

We assessed the performance of a new assay (VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 [bDNA 3.0] assay [Bayer Diagnostics]) to quantitate HCV RNA levels and compared the results of the bDNA 3.0 assay to results of the Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA 2.0) assay. Samples used in this study included 211 serum specimens from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons from two sites (Bordeaux and Marseille, France) with different genotypes; 383 serum specimens from HCV antibody-negative, HCV RNA-negative persons; and serial dilutions of World Health Organization (WHO) HCV RNA standard at a titer of 100,000 IU/ml. The specificity of the bDNA 3.0 assay was 98.2%. A high correlation was observed between expected and observed values in all dilutions of WHO standard (r = 0.9982), in serial dilutions of pooled samples (r = 0.9996), and in diluted sera from different HCV genotypes (r = 0.9930 to 0.9995). The standard deviations (SD) for the within-run and between-run reproducibility of the bDNA 3.0 assay were <or=0.2 and <or=0.14, respectively. The intersite SD ranged from 0.03 to 0.14. The bDNA 3.0 assay results were positively correlated with the bDNA 2.0 assay results (r = 0.9533). Taking in account the overall performance, this assay could be used as a routine tool for the HCV RNA quantification.

Comparative evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0, QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0, and COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 Assays for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Advances in the molecular diagnosis of hepatitis C and their clinical implications

Serologic assays for diagnosis of hepatitis C infection may yield indeterminate results despite improvements in sensitivity and specificity through second- and third-generation assays. Direct detection of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA based on qualitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction or transcription-mediated amplification allows diagnosis in the early stages of acute infection and in patients unable to mount an antibody response. Quantitative HCV RNA assays are useful for selecting appropriate antiviral therapies, but until recently they have lacked comparability between tests. More sensitive qualitative assays should be used for determining duration of treatment or recognizing a sustained virologic response to therapy. Hepatitis C virus genotyping can be performed from a limited sequence analysis of the viral genome by using various techniques. Although newer genotyping methods are relatively practicable and are satisfactory for the discrimination of the majority of genotypes, discrimination between subtypes can be challenging. Serologic typing of HCV lacks sensitivity and specificity compared with molecular-based techniques. Recent advances in serologic assays and nucleic acid detection techniques allow physicians to make accurate diagnoses, and these assays serve as important tools in treatment planning.

Rates and risk factors of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis c

BACKGROUND AIMS

In hepatitis C there is controversy over the linearity of the rate of progression and the significance of gender, mode of infection and viral factors.

METHODS

2313 untreated patients with a reliable estimated duration of infection and liver fibrosis were included. Fibrosis progression was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the rate of fibrosis progression using the hazard function. Seven risk factors were assessed: age at biopsy, gender, alcohol consumption, mode of infection, activity grade, hepatitis C virus genotype and RNA level.

RESULTS

The percentage of patients without cirrhosis was 91% after 20 years of infection (95% CI:90-92%) and 56% after 40 years (95% CI:48-64%). Three independent factors were associated (P < 0.001) with a faster progression rate: age at infection, alcohol consumption of 50 g or more per day, and male gender. The mode of infection, histologic activity, genotype and viral load were not independently associated with fibrosis. Fibrosis progression was mainly dependent on age and the duration of infection and can be divided into four successive periods with very slow, slow, intermediate and rapid progression rates.

CONCLUSION

In patients infected with hepatitis C, the majority of fibrosis progression occurred in those aged fifty years or older.

Standardization of hepatitis C virus RNA quantification

It was recently recommended that hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification be used to tailor the duration of combined interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin therapy in patients infected by HCV genotypes 1, 4, and 5. This recommendation has been difficult to implement in the absence of standardized quantitative units for HCV RNA. The aim of this work was to define clinically relevant HCV RNA loads in standardized international units (IU), for use in routine clinical and research applications based on standardized quantitative assays. Two hepatitis C virus RNA quantitative assays were used: (1) the Superquant assay (National Genetics Institute, Los Angeles, CA), for which possibly relevant thresholds were established; and (2) the semi-automated Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor assay version 2.0 (Cobas v2.0, Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA) that measures HCV RNA loads in IU/mL. Quantification in the Cobas v2.0 assay was linear over the entire range of values tested, including viral loads higher than 850,000 IU/mL after 100-fold dilution. The accuracy and precision of the measures in IU/mL were satisfactory with Cobas v2.0. The results obtained with Superquant and Cobas v2.0 correlated (r =.932; P <.0001). A value of 2,000,000 copies/mL (6.3 log(10) copies/mL) with Superquant was converted to nearly 800,000 IU/mL (5.9 log(10) IU/mL). In conclusion, all HCV RNA quantitative assays should give HCV RNA loads in international units and be validated with appropriate calibrated panels; 800,000 IU/mL in any of these assays should be used as the decision threshold to tailor the IFN-alpha/ribavirin treatment duration in patients infected by HCV genotypes 1, 4, and 5.

A new step toward standardization of serum hepatitis C virus-RNA quantification in patients with chronic hepatitis C

The need to improve efficacy of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C has prompted the development of quantitative assays, which allows the assessment of viral load before therapy. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of 3 serum HCV-RNA quantitative assays in 87 patients with chronic hepatitis C, the noncommercially available SuperQuant assay (National Genetic Institute), recently used in large international controlled trials, the most early and widely used Quantiplex HCV RNA v2.0 assay (branched DNA [bDNA] v2.0; Bayer Diagnostics, Puteaux, France), and the new generation Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor assay (COBAS v2.0; Roche Diagnostics Systems, Meylan, France), which is a semiautomated reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. The level and range of quantification were similar between all assays and a strong correlation was observed over all HCV genotypes among the assays. Recent publications have suggested that the baseline cut-off level of 2 x 10(6) copies/mL, as determined by the SuperQuant assay, is able to discriminate between patients with low viral load from those with high viral load and can be used to predict responses to therapy. Because all 3 assays use different testing technologies we examined how many of our patients fell above this defined cut-off level when tested by the other assays; of 22 patients measured below 2 x 10(6) copies/mL with the SuperQuant assay, 17 of 22 and 19 of 22 patients were eligible with the bDNA v2. 0 and the COBAS v2.0 assays, respectively (P >.05). Our results indicate that the 2 commercial assays can be used to determine treatment schedules in patients with chronic hepatitis C, providing a flexibility in multicenter controlled trials by offering better accessibility of test results.

[Viral quantitation of hepatitis C virus: present and future]

INTRODUCTION

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) plasmatic load, also called HCV viremia, is expressed in copies per milliliter or viral particle equivalents per milliliter.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

The methods used to measure HCV viremia are based on two principles: the quantitation of viral proteins (measure of antigenemia using monoclonal antibodies), and the quantitation of viral nucleic acid using PCR after reverse transcription (RT-PCR), or signal amplification (branched DNA). There is no relationship between viremia and liver histologic activity.

FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS

The use of HCV quantitative viremia in a treatment algorithm, including other factors such as age, genotype, degree of viral genetic heterogeneity, and liver fibrosis score will help adapt therapeutic associations for each individual.

Diagnostic tests for hepatitis C

Two categories of virological assays are in practice used for the diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, including serological and molecular biology-based assays. Serological assays include: screening tests based on enzyme immunoassays (EIAs); supplemental "analytical" assays based on immunoblot testing; and serological assays detecting genotype-specific antibodies for the serological determination of HCV genotype, so-called "serotyping" assays. Molecular assays include: qualitative assays, detecting HCV RNA in body fluids; quantitative assays measuring HCV viral load, a parameter that estimates the level of HCV replication in the liver; and tests analyzing the sequence of HCV genomes (genotyping assays).

Clinical use of hepatitis C virus tests for diagnosis and monitoring during therapy

This article reviewed various methods used for the diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection and discusses potential clinical applications. Substantial improvements have recently been made in assay technology. Moreover, the role of molecular testing in the clinical setting of hepatitis C is becoming better defined. The major challenge facing clinical laboratories is the further refinement, implementation, and standardization of optimized molecular tests, so that reliable data may be made available to clinicians. In turn, clinicians must understand the limitations of each methodology, including the variability of testing that may occur among different laboratories. As more experience is gathered, molecular testing will probably provide important data regarding the most effective use of current and future therapies for individual patients to achieve maximum benefit in the management of hepatitis C.