Hippocampal modulation of locomotor activity induced by focal activation of postsynaptic dopamine receptors in the core of the nucleus accumbens

Pharmacological profile of N-(2,6-dichlorophenyl)-2-(4-methyl-1-piperidinyl)acetamide, a novel analogue of lidocaine

AIM

N-(2,6-Dichlorophenyl)-2-(4-methyl-1-piperidinyl)acetamide (LIA), a lidocaine analogue, has potential applications in treating neuropathic pain. The aim of this work was to characterize the pharmacological activity of LIA related with central nervous system and cardiovascular activity.

METHODS

Anesthetic effect was tested in guinea pigs and mice. Ambulatory activity, anti-anxiety effect, sodium pentobarbital (PB)-induced hypnosis and pentylenetetrazol (PTZ)-induced seizures test were evaluated in mice to determine the possible central nervous system activity. The cardiovascular activities in vivo and ex vivo were analyzed in rats.

KEY FINDINGS

LIA (2%) presents, similar to lidocaine (2%), anesthetic activity on the corneal reflex, infiltration anesthesia and tail immersion test. LIA (1-100mg/kg, i.p.), similar to lidocaine (1-100mg/kg, i.p.), presents a dose-dependent sedative-hypnotic effect in mice. Both compounds did not produce anti-anxiety activity in mice. LIA did not prevent PTZ-induced seizures. However, LIA itself did not produce seizures at high doses in mice, as lidocaine does. LIA is a vasorelaxant compound for smooth muscle cells and presents hypotensive effect in vivo without increments to the heart rate significantly.

SIGNIFICANCE

High doses of lidocaine produce seizures and vasoconstriction. In this study, we found that LIA shares a similar pharmacological profile as lidocaine's but without the primary adverse effects of seizures and vasoconstriction.

Dopamine is involved in food-anticipatory activity in mice

When food is available during a restricted and predictable time of the day, mammals exhibit food-anticipatory activity (FAA), an increase in locomotor activity preceding the presentation of food. Although many studies have attempted to locate the food-entrainable circadian oscillator in the central nervous system, the pathways that mediate food entrainment are a matter of controversy. The present study was designed to determine the role of dopaminergic and histaminergic systems on FAA. Mice were given access to food for 2 h (ZT12-ZT14), and FAA was defined as the locomotor activity that occurred 2 h before the availability of food. Dopamine D(1) receptor (R), D(2)R, and histamine H(1)R-specific antagonists were used to clarify the role of dopamine and histamine receptors in FAA induced by food restriction (FR). FAA was monitored by infrared locomotor activity sensors. Mice were sacrificed at ZT12 on the 14th day of FR, and monoamine concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to electrochemical detection (HPLC-ECD). The results showed that pretreatment with the D(1)R antagonist SCH23390 at 1, 3, or 10 µg/kg significantly reduced FAA by 19% (p < 0.05), 26% (p < 0.05), or 19% (p < 0.01), respectively, and the D(2)R antagonist raclopride at 22, 67, or 200 µg/kg significantly reduced FAA by 16% (p < 0.05), 36% (p < 0.01), or 41% (p < 0.01), respectively, as compared with vehicle control. Moreover, coadministration of SCH23390 (10 µg/kg) and raclopride (200 µg/kg) synergistically inhibited FAA by 57% (p < 0.01) as compared with vehicle control. Consistently, the levels of dopamine and its metabolites in the striatum and midbrain were significantly increased during FAA, even with the pretreatment of D(1)R and D(2)R antagonists. However, pretreatment with pyrilamine at 2.5, 5, or 10 mg/kg did not significantly reduce FAA, although it reduced the locomotor activity during the dark period in ad libitum mice. These results strongly indicate that the dopaminergic system plays an essential role in the FAA in mice.

Towards a reconceptualization of striatal interactions between glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission and their contribution to the production of movements

According to the current model of the basal ganglia organization, simultaneous activation of the striato-nigral direct pathway by glutamatergic and dopaminergic neurotransmission should lead to a synergistic facilitatory action on locomotor activity, while in contrast activation of the indirect pathway by these two neurotransmittions should lead to antagonistic effects on locomotor activity. Based on published data, as a break with the current thinking, we propose a reconceptualization of functional interactions between dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission. In this model, dopaminergic neurotransmission is seen as a motor pacemaker responsible for the basal and primary activation of striatal output neurons and glutamate as a driver providing a multiple combination of tonic, phasic, facilitatory and inhibitory influxes resulting from the processing of environmental, emotional and mnesic stimuli. Thus, in the model, glutamate-coded inputs would allow tuning the intrinsic motor-activating properties of dopamine to adjust the production of locomotor activity into goal-oriented movements.

Repeated administration of amphetamine induces a shift of the prefrontal cortex and basolateral amygdala motor function

The role of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and basolateral amygdala (BLA) in the expression of behavioural locomotor sensitization to amphetamine (Amph) has been poorly studied. In the present study, we investigated how lidocaine infused in the mPFC or BLA modulated motor responses to acute and repeated (sensitization) Amph administration. We showed that reversible blockade of mPFC or BLA by lidocaine increased both locomotor and rearing responses to acute Amph, but blocked the expression of behavioural sensitization to Amph. These findings indicate that under free-lidocaine conditions repeated administration of Amph would produce a shift of mPFC and BLA motor function from an inhibitory to a facilitatory role in response to Amph. We propose that this phenomenon may be of major critical importance in the development of drug dependence.

Neurobehavioral abnormalities in the dysbindin-1 mutant, sandy, on a C57BL/6J genetic background

Sandy mice have a deletion mutation in the gene encoding dysbindin-1, Dtnbp1, with consequent reduction of the protein in heterozygotes and its loss in homozygotes. The sandy mouse thus serves as an animal model of dysbindin-1 function. As this protein is concentrated in synaptic tissue and affects transmitter release, it may affect neuronal processes that mediate behavior. To investigate the neurobehavioral effects of the Dtnbp1 mutation, we studied littermate sandy and wild-type controls on a C57BL/6J genetic background. The three animal groups were indistinguishable in their external physical characteristics, sensorimotor skills and indices of anxiety-like behaviors. In the open field, however, homozygous animals were hyperactive and appeared to show less habituation to the initially novel environment. In the Morris water maze, homozygous animals displayed clear deficits in spatial learning and memory with marginal deficits in visual association learning. Apart from the last mentioned deficits, these abnormalities are consistent with hippocampal dysfunction and in some cases with elevated dopaminergic transmission via D2 dopamine receptors. As similar deficits in spatial learning and memory have been found in schizophrenia, where decreased dysbindin-1 has been found in the hippocampus, the sandy mouse may also model certain aspects of cognition and behavior relevant to schizophrenia.

Modulation by the dorsal, but not the ventral, hippocampus of the expression of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine

Although the dorsal hippocampus (DH) and the ventral hippocampus (VH) densely innervate the nucleus accumbens, which mediates the expression of behavioural sensitization, the respective and specific contribution of DH and VH in the expression of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine has not been investigated. In the present study, we investigated how lidocaine infused in DH or VH modulated behavioural locomotor sensitization induced by repeated administration of systemic amphetamine. Rats, well habituated to their environmental conditions and experimental protocol, were given repeated administration of systemic amphetamine. Once behavioural sensitization was developed, rats were challenged with amphetamine and infused with saline (controls) or lidocaine into DH or VH. We found that reversible inhibition by lidocaine of DH, but not VH, blocks the expression of behavioural sensitization to amphetamine. Control animals injected with saline solution do express behavioural sensitization. Our results bring new insights on the role of the hippocampus complex in the expression of behavioural sensitization, indicating that, in individuals well habituated to the drug-associated context, DH but not VH would play a key role. The results provide experimental evidence for clinical studies in human addicts that have demonstrated that exposure to environmental stimuli associated with drug-taking behaviour elicits craving and can promote relapse, and further suggest that in drug abusers, once addiction has occurred, the contextual and spatial conditions that are associated with drug consumption may play a critical role in the maintenance of drug abuse.

Modulation by group I mGLU receptor activation and group III mGLU receptor blockade of locomotor responses induced by D1-like and D2-like receptor agonists in the nucleus accumbens

Evidence for functional motor interactions between group I and group III metabotropic glutamatergic (mGlu) receptors and dopamine neurotransmission is now clearly established [David, H.N., Abraini, J.H., 2001a. The group I metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist S-4-CPG modulates the locomotor response produced by the activation of D1-like, but not D2-like, dopamine receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 2157-2164, David, H.N., Abraini, J.H., 2002. Group III metabotropic glutamate receptors and D1-like and D2-like dopamine receptors interact in the rat nucleus accumbens to influence locomotor activity. Eur. J. Neurosci. 15, 869-875]. Nevertheless, whether or not and how, activation of group I and blockade of group III mGlu receptors modulate the motor responses induced by the activation of dopaminergic receptors in the NAcc still remains unknown. Answering this question needs to be assessed since functional interactions between neurotransmitters in the NAcc are well known to depend upon the level of activation of glutamatergic and/or dopaminergic receptors and because the effects of glutamatergic receptor agonists and antagonists on dopaminergic receptor-mediated locomotor responses are not always reciprocal as shown in previous studies. Our results show that activation of group I mGlu receptors by DHPG in the NAcc potentiated the locomotor response induced by intra-NAcc activation of D1-like receptors and blocked those induced by D2-like presynaptic or postsynaptic receptors. Alternatively, blockade of group III mGlu receptors by MPPG in the NAcc potentiated the locomotor responses mediated by D1-like receptors and by D2-like postsynaptic receptors and inhibited that induced by D2-like presynaptic receptors. These results compiled with previous data demonstrate that group I mGlu receptors and group III mGlu receptors can modulate the locomotor responses produced by D1-like and/or D2-like receptor agonists in a complex phasic and tonic fashion.