1
|
Jindal M, Barnert E, Chomilo N, Gilpin Clark S, Cohen A, Crookes DM, Kershaw KN, Kozhimannil KB, Mistry KB, Shlafer RJ, Slopen N, Suglia SF, Nguemeni Tiako MJ, Heard-Garris N. Policy solutions to eliminate racial and ethnic child health disparities in the USA. THE LANCET. CHILD & ADOLESCENT HEALTH 2024; 8:159-174. [PMID: 38242598 PMCID: PMC11163982 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(23)00262-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
Societal systems act individually and in combination to create and perpetuate structural racism through both policies and practices at the local, state, and federal levels, which, in turn, generate racial and ethnic health disparities. Both current and historical policy approaches across multiple sectors-including housing, employment, health insurance, immigration, and criminal legal-have the potential to affect child health equity. Such policies must be considered with a focus on structural racism to understand which have the potential to eliminate or at least attenuate disparities. Policy efforts that do not directly address structural racism will not achieve equity and instead worsen gaps and existing disparities in access and quality-thereby continuing to perpetuate a two-tier system dictated by racism. In Paper 2 of this Series, we build on Paper 1's summary of existing disparities in health-care delivery and highlight policies within multiple sectors that can be modified and supported to improve health equity, and, in so doing, improve the health of racially and ethnically minoritised children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monique Jindal
- Department of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Elizabeth Barnert
- Department of Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Nathan Chomilo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Shawnese Gilpin Clark
- Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alyssa Cohen
- Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Danielle M Crookes
- Department of Health Sciences, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Sociology and Anthropology, College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kiarri N Kershaw
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Katy Backes Kozhimannil
- Division of Health Policy and Management, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Kamila B Mistry
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Office of Extramural Research, Education, and Priority Populations, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Rebecca J Shlafer
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Natalie Slopen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Center on the Developing Child, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Shakira F Suglia
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | - Nia Heard-Garris
- Smith Child Health Outcomes, Research, and Evaluation Center, Stanley Manne Children's Research Institute, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA; Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pomeranz JL, Silver D, Lieff SA, Pagán JA. State Paid Sick Leave and Paid Sick-Leave Preemption Laws Across 50 U.S. States, 2009-2020. Am J Prev Med 2022; 62:688-695. [PMID: 35459452 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Paid sick leave is associated with lower mortality risks and increased use of health services. Yet, the U.S. lacks a national law, and not all employers offer paid leave, especially to low-wage workers. States have enacted paid sick-leave laws or preemption laws that prohibit local governments from enacting paid sick-leave requirements. METHODS In 2019 and 2021, state paid sick-leave laws and preemption laws in effect in 2009-2020 were retrieved from Lexis+, coded, and analyzed for coverage and other features. Data from the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis were used to estimate the jobs covered by state paid sick-leave laws in 2009-2019. RESULTS In 2009, no state had a paid sick-leave law, and 1 state had preemption. By 2020, a total of 12 states had paid sick-leave laws, with a form of preemption (n=9) or no preemption (n=3), and 18 additional states solely preempted local laws without requiring coverage, creating a regulatory vacuum in those states. Although all state paid sick-leave laws covered private employers and required care for children and spouses, some laws exempted small or public employers or did not cover additional family members. The percentage of U.S. jobs covered by state-required paid sick leave grew from 0% in 2009 to 27.6% in 2019. CONCLUSIONS Variation in state paid sick-leave laws, preemption, and lack of employer provision of paid sick leave to low-wage workers creates substantial inequities nationally. The federal government should enact a national paid sick-leave law.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Pomeranz
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York.
| | - Diana Silver
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - Sarah A Lieff
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| | - José A Pagán
- Department of Public Health Policy and Management, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|