Malignant Melanoma in Children and Adolescents Treated in Pediatric Oncology Centers: An Australian and New Zealand Children's Oncology Group (ANZCHOG) Study

OBJECTIVES

Unlike adults, malignant melanoma in children and adolescents is rare. In adult melanoma, significant progress in understanding tumor biology and new treatments, including targeted therapies and immunotherapy have markedly improved overall survival. In sharp contrast, there is a paucity of data on the biology and clinical behavior of pediatric melanoma. We report a national case series of all pediatric and adolescent malignant melanoma presenting to ANZCHOG Childhood Cancer Centers in Australia and New Zealand.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, multi-center study was undertaken to identify patients less than 18 years of age treated for cutaneous malignant melanoma over a twenty-year period (1994 to 2014). Data on clinical characteristics, histopathology, and extent of disease, treatment and follow-up are described.

RESULTS

A total of 37 cases of malignant melanoma were identified from all of the Australasian tertiary Childhood Cancer Centers. The median age was 10 years (range 1 month - 17 years). Clinically, the most common type of lesion was pigmented, occurring in sixteen (57%) patients, whilst amelanotic was seen in 7 patients (25%). In 11 (27.9%) the Breslow thickness was greater than 4mm. A total of 11 (29.7%) patients relapsed and 90% of these died of disease. Five-year event free survival (EFS) and overall survival were 63.2 (95% CI: 40.6 - 79.1) and 67.7% (95% CI: 45.1 - 82.6) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our data confirms that melanoma is a rare presentation of cancer to tertiary Australasian Childhood Cancer Centers with only 37 cases identified over two decades. Notably, melanoma managed in Childhood Cancer Centers is frequently at an advanced stage, with a high percentage of patients relapsing and the majority of these patients who relapsed died of disease. This study confirms previous clinical and prognostic information to support the early multidisciplinary management in Childhood Cancer Centers, in conjunction with expert adult melanoma centers, of this rare and challenging patient group.

Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Danish Sun Safety Campaign 2007-2015: Cost Savings from Sunburn and Sunbed Use Reduction and Derived Skin Cancer Reductions 2007-2040 in the Danish Population

BACKGROUND

Ninety percent of skin cancers are avoidable. In Denmark, 16,500 cases of melanoma and keratinocyte cancers were registered in 2015. The Danish Sun Safety Campaign has campaigned since 2007, targeting overexposure to ultraviolet radiation. During 2007-2015, the key indicators of skin cancer, i.e. sunbed use and sunburn, showed annual reductions of 6% and 1%, respectively.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the financial savings to society as a result of the campaign reductions in skin cancer cases (2007-2040), and to examine the campaign's cost-benefit and return on investment (ROI).

METHODS

The analysis is based on existing data: (1) annual population-based surveys regarding the Danish population's behavior in the sun; (2) skin cancer projections; (3) relative risks of skin cancers from sunburn and sunbed use and (4) historical cancer incidences, combined with new data; (5) benefits from the avoided costs of skin cancer reductions; and (6) the costs of the Danish Sun Safety Campaign.

RESULTS

The results were based on a reduction of 9000 skin cancer cases, saving €29 million of which €13 million were derived from sunburn reductions and €16 million from reductions in sunbed use. The ROI was €2.18.

CONCLUSION

Skin cancer prevention in Denmark is cost effective. Every Euro spent by the Danish Sun Safety Campaign saved the Danish health budget €2.18 in health expenses.

Future reduction of cutaneous malignant melanoma due to improved sun protection habits and decreased common melanocytic nevi density among Swedish children?: A follow-up from 2002 to 2012

We have previously demonstrated significant improvements in sun protection regimens and significantly fewer common melanocytic nevi (CMN) among 7-year-old children in southern Sweden when comparing year 2007 with 2002. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the observed decreasing trend also can be observed at age 10 and, in addition, to compare the CMN density change between 7 and 10 years of age during two periods of time. Two open cohorts were used, cohort I with schoolchildren investigated in 2002 at age 7 and in 2005 at age 10 and cohort II with schoolchildren investigated in 2009 at age 7 and in 2012 at age 10. A significant decrease in CMN density (number/m² BSA) at age 10 from 2005 to 2012 was observed: 15.9 (14.7-17.2) and 11.4 (10.1-12.7), respectively. The density growth rate from 7 to 10 years was 2.8 (2.1-3.5) between 2002 and 2005 and decreased significantly to 0.9 (0.2-1.5) between 2009 and 2012. Significant increases were observed for 'often use of sunscreen', 'often staying in shade' and 'often staying indoors' from cohort I to cohort II: 65 vs 80%, 7.6 vs 13% and 7.3 vs 19%, respectively. The decrease in number of CMN among 10-year-old children confirms a current trend in Sweden. If this persists, a future reduction of cutaneous malignant melanoma incidence in Sweden might be anticipated. The results also indicate that CMN count could be used as an indicator of ultraviolet exposure.

Malignant melanoma incidence among children and adolescents in Texas and SEER 13, 1995-2013

BACKGROUND

Epidemiological knowledge and predictors of melanoma among children and adolescents in multiethnic populations are limited.

PROCEDURE

Using data from the Texas Cancer Registry (TCR) and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 13 database, we identified incident melanoma cases diagnosed at 0-20 years old during 1995-2013 in Texas and the United States, respectively. Using negative binomial regression, associations between demographic factors and melanoma incidence rates (IR) were evaluated by calculating incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Annual percent change in IRs was assessed with joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

Overall, the melanoma IR was 4.16 (TCR, n = 634) and 4.84 (SEER, n = 1260) per million. Females, adolescents, non-Hispanic (NH) whites, and Hispanics had higher IRs compared with other groups (P < 0.05). In adjusted analyses, Hispanics had a higher incidence of melanoma than NH non-whites (Texas IRR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.30-3.61; SEER IRR = 2.88; 95% CI, 1.97-4.21). In Texas, NH whites with melanoma were more likely to live in low poverty areas, whereas the opposite trend was observed in Hispanics. Melanoma IRs increased throughout 1995-2004 followed by an average annual decrease of 7.6% (95% CI, -12.6%, -2.2%) in Texas and 6.0% (95% CI, -8.5%, -3.4%) in SEER during 2005-2013 (P < 0.05). However, these decreasing trends were not observed among Hispanics or those <10 years old.

CONCLUSION

Although the overall melanoma IR in children and adolescents appears to be decreasing, this trend is not evident among Hispanics and young children, implicating the need for further research investigating the etiologies and risk factors in these groups.

Challenges in assessing the sunscreen-melanoma association

Whether sunscreen use affects melanoma risk has been widely studied with contradictory results. To answer this question we performed a systematic review of all published studies, accounting for sources of heterogeneity and bias. We searched for original articles investigating the sunscreen‐melanoma association in humans to February 28, 2018. We then used random‐effects meta‐analysis to combine estimates of the association, stratified by study design. Stratified meta‐analysis and meta‐regression were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. We included 21,069 melanoma cases from 28 studies published 1979–2018: 23 case–control (11 hospital‐based, 12 population‐based), 1 ecological, 3 cohort and 1 randomised controlled trial (RCT). There was marked heterogeneity across study designs and among case–control studies but adjustment for confounding by sun exposure, sunburns and phenotype systematically moved estimates toward decreased melanoma risk among sunscreen users. Ever‐ vs. never‐use of sunscreen was inversely associated with melanoma in hospital‐based case–control studies (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.57, 95%confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.87, p_{heterogeneity} < 0.001), the ecological study (rate ratio = 0.48, 95%CI 0.35–0.66), and the RCT (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.49, 95%CI 0.24–1.01). It was not associated in population‐based case–control studies (OR = 1.17, 95%CI 0.90–1.51, p_{heterogeneity} < 0.001) and was positively associated in the cohort studies (HR = 1.27, 95%CI 1.07–1.51, p_{heterogeneity} = 0.236). The association differed by latitude (p_interaction = 0.042), region (p_interaction = 0.008), adjustment for naevi/freckling (p_interaction = 0.035), and proportion of never‐sunscreen‐users (p_interaction = 0·012). Evidence from observational studies on sunscreen use and melanoma risk was weak and heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only RCT showed a protective effect of sunscreen.

What's new?

Effectiveness of sunscreen in reducing UV‐induced skin damage has been proven in experimental studies, but effectiveness in reducing melanoma in humans remains inconclusive. This is the first meta‐analysis to analyze data from four study designs, stratify hospital‐ and population‐based case–control studies, and include as many as five prospective studies. Evidence from observational studies on the sunscreen‐melanoma association was heterogeneous, consistent with the challenges of controlling for innate confounding by indication. The only randomized controlled trial showed a protective effect. Public health recommendations should place greater emphasis on the proper use of sunscreen in conjunction with other means of sun protection.

Environmental effects of ozone depletion and its interactions with climate change: progress report, 2015

The Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) is one of three Panels that regularly informs the Parties (countries) to the Montreal Protocol on the effects of ozone depletion and the consequences of climate change interactions with respect to human health, animals, plants, biogeochemistry, air quality, and materials. The Panels provide a detailed assessment report every four years. The most recent 2014 Quadrennial Assessment by the EEAP was published as a special issue of seven papers in 2015 (Photochem. Photobiol. Sci., 2015, 14, 1-184). The next Quadrennial Assessment will be published in 2018/2019. In the interim, the EEAP generally produces an annual update or progress report of the relevant scientific findings. The present progress report for 2015 assesses some of the highlights and new insights with regard to the interactive nature of the effects of UV radiation, atmospheric processes, and climate change.