Prediagnosis and postdiagnosis smoking and survival following diagnosis with ovarian cancer

Lifetime Exposure to Cigarette Smoke, B-Cell Tumor Immune Infiltration, and Immunoglobulin Abundance in Ovarian Tumors

BACKGROUND

Cigarette smoke exposure has been linked to systemic immune dysfunction, including for B-cell and immunoglobulin (Ig) production, and poor outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer. No study has evaluated the impact of smoke exposure across the life-course on B-cell infiltration and Ig abundance in ovarian tumors.

METHODS

We measured markers of B and plasma cells and Ig isotypes using multiplex immunofluorescence on 395 ovarian cancer tumors in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS)/NHSII. We conducted beta-binomial analyses evaluating odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for positivity of immune markers by cigarette exposure among cases and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI for developing tumors with low (

RESULTS

There were no associations between smoke exposure and B-cell or IgM infiltration in ovarian tumors. Among cases, we observed higher odds of IgA+ among ever smokers (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14-2.07) and ever smokers with no parental smoke exposure (OR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.18-3.49) versus never smokers. Women with parental cigarette smoke exposure versus not had higher risk of developing ovarian cancer with low IgG+ (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10-2.09), whereas ever versus never smokers had a lower risk (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Ever smoking was associated with increased odds of IgA in ovarian tumors.

IMPACT

IgA has been associated with improved ovarian cancer outcomes, suggesting that although smoking is associated with poor outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer, it may lead to improved tumor immunogenicity.

Collapse

Key Words Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Female
• Ovarian Neoplasms/immunology
• Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology
• Ovarian Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Middle Aged
• Adult
• B-Lymphocytes/immunology
• Immunoglobulins/blood
• Lymphocytes, Tumor-Infiltrating/immunology
• Aged
• Cigarette Smoking/adverse effects
• Cigarette Smoking/immunology

Collapse

Grants

• P01 CA087969 NCI NIH HHS
• 9JK02 Florida Department of Health (DOH)
• UM1 CA186107 NCI NIH HHS
• P01 CA87969 National Cancer Institute (NCI)
• U01 CA232758 NCI NIH HHS
• U01 CA176726 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Cassandra A Hathaway Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Mary K Townsend Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Tianyi Wang Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Christine Vinci Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Danielle E Jake-Schoffman Department of Health Education and Behavior, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
Jonathan L Hecht Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Daryoush Saeed-Vafa Department of Anatomic Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida Advanced Analytical and Digital Laboratory, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Carlos Moran Segura Advanced Analytical and Digital Laboratory, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Jonathan V Nguyen Advanced Analytical and Digital Laboratory, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Jose R Conejo-Garcia Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina
Brooke L Fridley Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
Shelley S Tworoger Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida Knight Cancer Institute and Division of Oncological Sciences, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Collapse

Role of neighborhood context in ovarian cancer survival disparities: current research and future directions

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-associated mortality among US women with survival disparities seen across race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, even after accounting for histology, stage, treatment, and other clinical factors. Neighborhood context can play an important role in ovarian cancer survival, and, to the extent to which minority racial and ethnic groups and populations of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be segregated into neighborhoods with lower quality social, built, and physical environment, these contextual factors may be a critical component of ovarian cancer survival disparities. Understanding factors associated with ovarian cancer outcome disparities will allow clinicians to identify patients at risk for worse outcomes and point to measures, such as social support programs or transportation aid, that can help to ameliorate such disparities. However, research on the impact of neighborhood contextual factors in ovarian cancer survival and in disparities in ovarian cancer survival is limited. This commentary focuses on the following neighborhood contextual domains: structural and institutional context, social context, physical context represented by environmental exposures, built environment, rurality, and healthcare access. The research conducted to date is presented and clinical implications and recommendations for future interventions and studies to address disparities in ovarian cancer outcomes are proposed.

PM2.5 exposure and its interaction of oxidative balance score on ovarian cancer survival: A prospective cohort study

Recent evidence advises particles with a diameter of 2.5 µm or less (PM_2.5) might be a prognostic factor for ovarian cancer (OC) survival. The oxidative balance score (OBS) incorporates diet-lifestyle factors to estimate individuals' anti-oxidant exposure status which may be relevant to cancer prognosis. We aimed to investigate the roles of PM_2.5, and OBS and their interaction in OC prognosis. 663 patients with OC were enrolled in the current study. Satellite-derived annual average exposures to PM_2.5 based on patients' residential locations. The OBS was calculated based on 16 different diet-lifestyle components derived using an acknowledged self-reported questionnaire. The Cox regression model was performed to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for overall survival (OS). We also assessed the effect of modification between PM_2.5 and OS by OBS via interaction terms. During a median follow-up of 37.57 (interquartile:35.27-40.17) months, 123 patients died. Compared to low-concentration PM_2.5 exposure, high PM_2.5 during 1 year before diagnosis was associated with worse OC survival (HR= 1.19, 95% CI = 1.01-1.42). We observed an improved OS with the highest compared with the lowest OBS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.27-0.79, P for trend < 0.05). Notably, we also found an additive interaction between low OBS and high exposure to PM_2.5, with the corresponding associations of PM_2.5 being more pronounced among participants with lower OBS (HR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.09-1.86). PM_2.5 may blunt OC survival, but high OBS represented an antioxidative performance that could alleviate the adverse association of PM_2.5 and OS.

Association of smoking, alcohol, and coffee consumption with the risk of ovarian cancer and prognosis: a mendelian randomization study

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the association between smoking, alcohol, and coffee intake and the risk of ovarian cancer (OC) remains conflicting. In this study, we used a two-sample mendelian randomization (MR) method to evaluate the association of smoking, drinking and coffee consumption with the risk of OC and prognosis.

METHODS

Five risk factors related to lifestyles (cigarettes per day, smoking initiation, smoking cessation, alcohol consumption and coffee consumption) were chosen from the Genome-Wide Association Study, and 28, 105, 10, 36 and 36 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were obtained as instrumental variables (IVs). Outcome variables were achieved from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Inverse-variance-weighted method was mainly used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (Cl).

RESULTS

The two-sample MR analysis supported the causal association of genetically predicted smoking initiation (OR: 1.15 per SD, 95%CI: 1.02-1.29, P = 0.027) and coffee consumption (OR: 1.40 per 50% increase, 95%CI: 1.02-1.93, P = 0.040) with the risk of OC, but not cigarettes per day, smoking cessation, and alcohol consumption. Subgroup analysis based on histological subtypes revealed a positive genetical predictive association between coffee consumption and endometrioid OC (OR: 3.01, 95%CI: 1.50-6.04, P = 0.002). Several smoking initiation-related SNPs (rs7585579, rs7929518, rs2378662, rs10001365, rs11078713, rs7929518, and rs62098013), and coffee consumption-related SNPs (rs4410790, and rs1057868) were all associated with overall survival and cancer-specific survival in OC.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide the evidence for a favorable causal association of genetically predicted smoking initiation and coffee consumption with OC risk, and coffee consumption is linked to a greater risk of endometrioid OC.

The clinical impact of continued smoking in patients with breast and other hormone-dependent cancer: A systematic literature review

We conducted a systematic review of studies that investigated whether quitting smoking at or around diagnosis improves survival of patients with hormone-dependent cancers (HDC). Nine studies published in 2013-2022 were included. Studies were very diverse in terms of design, definition of quitters and continued smokers, and prevalence of prognostic factors other than smoking cessation (e.g. patients' demographics, tumour characteristic, and treatments). For breast, ovarian, and endometrial cancer, all included studies found that quitters had better overall, disease specific, and disease-free survival than continued smokers. For prostate cancer, there was no evidence of an association of smoking cessation with improved survival. This literature review provided suggestive evidence that female smokers diagnosed with cancer of the breast, ovary, or endometrium may improve their chances of surviving by stopping smoking. Smoking cessation counselling should become part of standard oncological care for these patients and integrated into breast cancer screening programs.

Lifetime Exposure to Cigarette Smoke and Risk of Ovarian Cancer by T-cell Tumor Immune Infiltration

BACKGROUND

Exposure to cigarette smoke, particularly in early life, is modestly associated with ovarian cancer risk and may impact systemic immunity and the tumor immune response. However, no studies have evaluated whether cigarette smoke exposure impacts the ovarian tumor immune microenvironment.

METHODS

Participants in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII reported on early life exposure to cigarette smoke and personal smoking history on questionnaires (n = 165,760). Multiplex immunofluorescence assays were used to measure markers of T cells and immune checkpoints in tumor tissue from 385 incident ovarian cancer cases. We used Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for developing ovarian tumors with a low (<median) or high (≥median) immune cell percentage by cigarette exposure categories.

RESULTS

Women exposed versus not to cigarette smoke early in life had a higher risk of developing ovarian cancer with low levels of T cells overall (CD3+: HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.08-2.20) and recently activated cytotoxic T cells (CD3+CD8+CD69+: HR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.05-2.00). These findings were not statistically significant at the Bonferroni-corrected P value of 0.0083. Adult smoking was not significantly associated with tumor immune markers after Bonferroni correction.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest early life cigarette smoke exposure may modestly increase risk of developing ovarian tumors with low abundance of total T cells and recently activated cytotoxic T cells.

IMPACT

Future research should focus on understanding the impact of exposures throughout the life course on the ovarian tumor immune microenvironment.

Treating Smoking in Cancer Patients: An Essential Component of Cancer Care-The New National Cancer Institute Tobacco Control Monograph

PURPOSE

Continued smoking after the diagnosis of cancer can markedly worsen oncology treatment side effects, cancer outcomes, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality. Conversely, mounting evidence demonstrates that smoking cessation by patients with cancer improves outcomes. A cancer diagnosis often serves as a teachable moment, characterized by high motivation to quit. However, too few patients with cancer who smoke are offered evidence-based smoking cessation treatment, and too few engage in such treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The National Cancer Institute commissioned Tobacco Control Monograph 23, Treating Smoking in Cancer Patients: An Essential Component of Cancer Care, to review and synthesize the evidence that clarifies the need to intervene with smoking in cancer care.

RESULTS

Although many patients with newly diagnosed cancer who smoke make quit attempts, many of these are unsuccessful, and among those who successfully quit, relapse is common. Indeed, an estimated 12.2% of adults ever diagnosed with cancer reported they currently smoked (National Health Interview Survey, 2020). Patients with cancer who smoke are likely to benefit from smoking cessation treatments, including counseling and US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications, and there are many effective strategies to increase delivery of smoking cessation treatment in cancer care settings.

CONCLUSION

Smoking cessation is among the most effective treatment options for improving the likelihood of survival, quality of life, and overall health of patients with cancer who smoke. It is important for cancer care clinicians and patients to realize that it is never too late to quit smoking and that there are clear benefits to doing so, regardless of cancer type.

Role of Fungal Infections in Carcinogenesis and Cancer Development: A Literature Review

Cancer is a serious debilitating disease and one of the most common causes of death. In recent decades the high risk of various cancers enforced scientists to discover novel prevention and treatment methods to diminish the mortality of this terrifying disease. Accordingly, its prevention can be possible in near future. Based on epidemiological evidence, there is a clear link between pathogenic fungal infections and cancer development. This association is often seen in people with weakened immune systems such as the elderly and people with acquired immunodeficiency (AIDS). Carcinoma in these people is first seen chronically and then acutely. Although the different genetic and environmental risk factors are involved in carcinogenesis, one of the most important risk factors is fungal species and infections associating with cancers etiology. Now it is known that microbial infection is responsible for initiating 2.2 million new cancer cases. In this way, many recent studies have focused on investigating the role and mechanism of fungal infections in diverse cancers occurrence. This review provides a comprehensive framework of the latest clinical findings and the association of fungal infections with versatile cancers including esophageal, gastric, colorectal, lung, cervical, skin, and ovarian cancer.

Tobacco Smoking and Survival Following a Diagnosis with Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the influence of smoking on ovarian cancer survival. We investigated this relationship in a hospital-based study.

METHODS

Analyses included 519 women with ovarian cancer. We used multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models to estimate HRs and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Risk of all-cause mortality was increased for current smokers (HR = 1.70; 95% CI: 1.09-2.63) versus never smokers, especially for those with ≥15 cigarettes per day (HR = 1.92; 95% CI: 1.15-3.20). Results were largely similar after additional adjustment for debulking status (current vs. never smokers, HR = 2.96; 95% CI: 1.07-8.21) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (comparable HR = 2.87; 95% CI: 1.02-8.06). Compared with never smokers, smoking duration ≥20 years (HR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.94-2.03) and ≥20 pack-years (HR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.92-1.99) were suggestively associated with worse outcomes. Current smoking was also positively associated with the risk of mortality among patients with ovarian cancer recurrence (current vs. never/past smokers, HR = 2.79; 95% CI: 1.44-5.41), despite the null association between smoking and recurrence (HR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.86-2.48). Furthermore, no association was observed for smoking initiation before age 18 (HR = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.80-1.85), or either environmental smoke exposure at home (HR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.76-1.78) or at work (HR = 1.10; 95% CI: 0.75-1.60).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest active tobacco smoking is associated with worse ovarian cancer outcomes, particularly after a recurrence.

IMPACT

Our findings support structured smoking cessation programs for patients with ovarian cancer, especially in recurrent settings. Further research to confirm these findings and examine the interplay between smoking and the tumor immune microenvironment may help provide insight into ovarian cancer etiology.

Ovarian cancer survival by stage, histotype, and pre-diagnostic lifestyle factors, in the prospective UK Million Women Study

BACKGROUND

Ovarian cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer mortality in UK women. Ovarian cancer survival varies by disease stage at diagnosis, but evidence is mixed on the effect of tumour histological type (histotype) and other factors.

METHODS

1.3 million UK women completed a detailed health questionnaire in 1996-2001 and were followed for incident cancers and deaths via linkage to national databases. Using Cox regression models, we estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) of death from ovarian cancer, by stage at diagnosis, tumour histotype, and 16 other personal characteristics of the women.

RESULTS

During 17.7 years' average follow-up, 13,222 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer, and 8697 of them died from the disease. Stage at diagnosis was a major determinant of survival (stage IV vs I, RR=10.54, 95% CI: 9.16-12.13). Histotype remained a significant predictor after adjustment for stage and other factors, but associations varied over the follow-up period. Histotype-specific survival was worse for high-grade than low-grade tumours. Survival appeared worse with older age at diagnosis (per 5 years: RR=1.19, 95% CI: 1.15-1.22), higher BMI (per 5-unit increase: RR=1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11), and smoking (current vs never: RR=1.17, 95% CI: 1.07-1.27), but there was little association with 13 other pre-diagnostic reproductive, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors.

CONCLUSION

Stage at diagnosis is a strong predictor of ovarian cancer survival, but tumour histotype and grade remain predictors of survival even after adjustment for stage and other factors, contributing further evidence of biological dissimilarity between the ovarian cancer histotypes. Obesity and smoking represent potentially-modifiable determinants of survival, but the stronger association with stage suggests that improving earlier diagnosis would have a greater impact on increasing ovarian cancer survival.

A decreased risk of meningioma in women smokers was only observed in American studies rather than studies conducted in other countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Whether smoking is related to a decreased risk of meningioma in women is still controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the association between smoking and risk of meningiomas in women.

Methods

Two authors independently performed a systematic literature review in the PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. We identified case-control and cohort studies quantifying associations between smoking and risk of meningioma in women. A meta-analysis by pooling studies was performed according to the multivariate-adjusted risk estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) preferentially. We further conducted additional subgroup and sensitivity analyses to explore possible explanations of the results.

Results

A total of seven observational studies were included, with a total of 2132 female patients diagnosed with meningiomas. Ever smoking was associated with a significantly reduced risk of meningioma in women, with pooled odds ratio (OR) of 0.83 (95% CI 0.70–0.98). Similar findings were noted for current (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.93) and past (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71–0.94) smokers. However, considering the areas, the OR of ever smoking was 0.77 (95% CI 0.68–0.87) in three American studies, but 0.99 (95% CI 0.73–1.35) in four studies conducted in other countries.

Conclusions

Based on limited epidemiological evidence, a decreased risk of meningioma in women smokers was only observed in American studies rather than studies conducted in other countries.

Antihypertensive medication use and ovarian cancer survival

OBJECTIVE

Although experimental models suggest that use of beta-blockers, a common antihypertensive agent, may improve survival in ovarian cancer patients, results from clinical studies have been mixed.

METHODS

We evaluated the associations of pre-diagnostic (n = 950) and post-diagnostic (n = 743) use of antihypertensive medications with survival among patients with invasive, epithelial ovarian cancer in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS; 1994-2016) and NHSII (2001-2017), with follow-up until 2018 and 2019, respectively. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for ovarian cancer mortality according to antihypertensive medication use before and after diagnosis, considering multiple drug classes (beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers, thiazide diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitors).

RESULTS

After adjusting for age, BMI, smoking status and tumor characteristics, pre-diagnostic use versus non-use of calcium-channel blockers was associated with higher ovarian cancer mortality (HR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.96), which was primarily due to polytherapy involving calcium-channel blockers (HR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.15, 2.26). Pre-diagnostic use of beta-blockers, thiazide diuretics, or ACE inhibitors was not associated with ovarian cancer mortality. No association was observed for post-diagnostic antihypertensive medication use individually or in combination, except for lower mortality associated with polytherapy involving ACE inhibitors (HR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.31, 0.91).

CONCLUSION

Overall, we did not find clear relationships between antihypertensive medication use and ovarian cancer mortality. However, given the limitation of the data, we cannot determine whether the association may differ by type of beta-blockers. The reasons underlying the observed associations with pre-diagnostic calcium-channel blocker use and post-diagnostic ACE inhibitor use require further investigation.

Prediagnosis and postdiagnosis leisure time physical activity and survival following diagnosis with ovarian cancer

Little is known about the influence of prediagnosis and postdiagnosis physical activity on ovarian cancer survival. We investigated this association in two large cohorts, the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII. Analyses included 1461 women with confirmed invasive, epithelial ovarian cancer and data on physical activity. Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for ovarian cancer-specific mortality. Ovarian cancer-specific mortality was not associated with physical activity reported 1-8 years before diagnosis overall (≥7.5 vs <1.5 MET-hours/week, HR = 0.96), for high-grade serous/ poorly differentiated tumors, or non-serous/ low-grade serous tumors (P-heterogeneity = .45). An inverse association was observed for activity 1-4 years after diagnosis (≥7.5 vs <1.5 MET-hours/week, HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.48-0.94), with similar results by histotype (P-heterogeneity = .53). Women who decreased their activity from ≥7.5 MET-hours/week 1-8 years before diagnosis to <7.5 MET-hours/week 1-4 years after diagnosis, compared to those with <7.5 MET-hours/week across periods, had a 49% increased risk of death (HR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.07-2.08). Physical activity after, but not before, ovarian cancer diagnosis was associated with better prognosis.

A healthy lifestyle and survival among women with ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer has a poor survival rate and, understandably, women often want to know whether there is anything they can do to improve their prognosis. Our goal was to investigate the association between a healthy lifestyle prediagnosis and postdiagnosis and survival in a cohort of Australian women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer. We calculated a healthy lifestyle index (HLI) based on women's self-reported smoking status, height, weight, physical activity, diet and alcohol consumption before diagnosis (n = 678) and after completing primary treatment (n = 512). Clinical data and vital status for each woman were ascertained through medical records. Cox proportional hazards regression was conducted to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for all-cause mortality. There was a suggestive association between a more healthy lifestyle before diagnosis and better survival (HR 0.79, 95% CI: 0.59-1.04), however, the association was stronger for lifestyle after diagnosis, with women in the highest tertile having significantly better survival than women in the lowest tertile (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40-0.93; P-trend = .02). Current smoking, particularly postdiagnosis, was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.17-2.42; HR 2.82, 95% CI: 1.29-6.14, for prediagnosis and postdiagnosis smoking, respectively), but women who quit after diagnosis had survival outcomes similar to nonsmokers (HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.57-1.72). Higher physical activity after diagnosis was associated with better survival (HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.39-0.92; P-trend = .02). A healthy lifestyle after diagnosis, in particular not smoking and being physically active, may help women with ovarian cancer improve their prognosis.