1
|
Marty S, Lamé G, Guével E, Priou S, Chatellier G, Tournigand C, Kempf E. Impact of the Sars-Cov-2 outbreak on the initial clinical presentation of new solid cancer diagnoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:143. [PMID: 38287348 PMCID: PMC10823607 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11795-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic might have delayed cancer diagnosis and management. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the initial tumor stage of new cancer diagnoses before and after the pandemic. METHODS We systematically reviewed articles that compared the tumor stage of new solid cancer diagnoses before and after the initial pandemic waves. We conducted a random-effects meta-analysis to compare the rate of metastatic tumors and the distribution of stages at diagnosis. Subgroup analyses were performed by primary tumor site and by country. RESULTS From 2,013 studies published between January 2020 and April 2022, we included 58 studies with 109,996 patients. The rate of metastatic tumors was higher after the COVID-19 outbreak than before (pooled OR: 1.29 (95% CI, 1.06-1.57), I2: 89% (95% CI, 86-91)). For specific cancers, common ORs reached statistical significance for breast (OR: 1.51 (95% CI 1.07-2.12)) and gynecologic (OR: 1.51 (95% CI 1.04-2.18)) cancers, but not for other cancer types. According to countries, common OR (95% CI) reached statistical significance only for Italy: 1.55 (1.01-2.39) and Spain:1.14 (1.02-1.29). Rates were comparable for stage I-II versus III-IV in studies for which that information was available, and for stages I-II versus stage III in studies that did not include metastatic patients. CONCLUSIONS Despite inter-study heterogeneity, our meta-analysis showed a higher rate of metastatic tumors at diagnosis after the pandemic. The burden of social distancing policies might explain those results, as patients may have delayed seeking care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Marty
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Guillaume Lamé
- Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Paris Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Etienne Guével
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT Department, Paris, France
| | - Sonia Priou
- Laboratoire Genie Industriel, CentraleSupélec, Paris Saclay University, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Department of medical informatics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre-Université de Paris (APHP-CUP), Université de Paris, F-75015, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier Teaching Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 1 rue Gustave Eiffel, 94000, Créteil, France.
- Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e-Santé, LIMICS, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guével E, Priou S, Lamé G, Wassermann J, Bey R, Uzan C, Chatellier G, Belkacemi Y, Tannier X, Guillerm S, Flicoteaux R, Gligorov J, Cohen A, Benderra M, Teixeira L, Daniel C, Hersant B, Tournigand C, Kempf E. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical presentation, treatments, and outcomes of new breast cancer patients: A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20918-20929. [PMID: 37909210 PMCID: PMC10709737 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Revised: 09/14/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The SARS CoV-2 pandemic disrupted healthcare systems. We compared the cancer stage for new breast cancers (BCs) before and during the pandemic. METHODS We performed a retrospective multicenter cohort study on the data warehouse of Greater Paris University Hospitals (AP-HP). We identified all female patients newly referred with a BC in 2019 and 2020. We assessed the timeline of their care trajectories, initial tumor stage, and treatment received: BC resection, exclusive systemic therapy, exclusive radiation therapy, or exclusive best supportive care (BSC). We calculated patients' 1-year overall survival (OS) and compared indicators in 2019 and 2020. RESULTS In 2019 and 2020, 2055 and 1988, new BC patients underwent cancer treatment, and during the two lockdowns, the BC diagnoses varied by -18% and by +23% compared to 2019. De novo metastatic tumors (15% and 15%, p = 0.95), pTNM and ypTNM distributions of 1332 cases with upfront resection and of 296 cases with neoadjuvant therapy did not differ (p = 0.37, p = 0.3). The median times from first multidisciplinary meeting and from diagnosis to treatment of 19 days (interquartile 11-39 days) and 35 days (interquartile 22-65 days) did not differ. Access to plastic surgery (15% and 17%, p = 0.08) and to treatment categories did not vary: tumor resection (73% and 72%), exclusive systemic therapy (13% and 14%), exclusive radiation therapy (9% and 9%), exclusive BSC (5% and 5%) (p = 0.8). Among resected patients, the neoadjuvant therapy rate was lower in 2019 (16%) versus 2020 (20%) (p = 0.02). One-year OS rates were 99.3% versus 98.9% (HR = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.77-1.2), 72.6% versus 76.6% (HR = 1.28; 95% CI, 0.95-1.72), 96.6% versus 97.8% (HR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.94), and 15.5% versus 15.1% (HR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.72-1.37), in the treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS Despite a decrease in the number of new BCs, there was no tumor stage shift, and OS did not vary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etienne Guével
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT DepartmentParisFrance
| | - Sonia Priou
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT DepartmentParisFrance
- CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Génie IndustrielUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Guillaume Lamé
- CentraleSupélec, Laboratoire Génie IndustrielUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Johanna Wassermann
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of medical oncology, Pitié Salpétrière University HospitalSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de cancérologieSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Romain Bey
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT DepartmentParisFrance
| | - Catherine Uzan
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de cancérologieSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of gynecology, Pitié Salpétrière University HospitalSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- Department of medical informatics, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Centre‐Université de Paris (APHP‐CUP)Université Paris CItéParisFrance
| | - Yazid Belkacemi
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier University HospitalUniversité Paris Est CréteilCréteilFrance
| | - Xavier Tannier
- Sorbonne University Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e‐Santé, LIMICSParisFrance
| | - Sophie Guillerm
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of radiation therapy, Saint Louis University HospitalUniversité Paris CitéCréteilFrance
| | - Rémi Flicoteaux
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de ParisDepartment of medical informationParisFrance
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de cancérologieSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of medical oncology, Tenon University HospitalSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Ariel Cohen
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT DepartmentParisFrance
| | - Marc‐Antoine Benderra
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Institut Universitaire de cancérologieSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of medical oncology, Tenon University HospitalSorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Luis Teixeira
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of senology, Saint Louis Teaching HospitalUniversité Paris CitéParisFrance
| | - Christel Daniel
- Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Innovation and Data, IT DepartmentParisFrance
- Sorbonne University Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e‐Santé, LIMICSParisFrance
| | - Barbara Hersant
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of plastic surgery, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier University HospitalUniversité Paris Est CréteilCréteilFrance
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier University HospitalUniversité Paris Est CréteilCréteilFrance
| | - Emmanuelle Kempf
- Sorbonne University Inserm, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Laboratoire d'Informatique Médicale et d'Ingénierie des Connaissances pour la e‐Santé, LIMICSParisFrance
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of medical oncology, Henri Mondor and Albert Chenevier University HospitalUniversité Paris Est CréteilCréteilFrance
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miyamori D, Kamitani T, Yoshida S, Shigenobu Y, Ikeda K, Kikuchi Y, Kashima S, Yamamoto Y. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality among patients with colorectal cancer in Hiroshima, Japan: A large cancer registry study. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20554-20563. [PMID: 37877230 PMCID: PMC10660096 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer care and mortality using a large cancer registry in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The study aimed to estimate the all-cause mortality rates within 1 year of diagnosis among colorectal cancer patients diagnosed during the pandemic period (2020 and 2021) compared to those diagnosed during the pre-pandemic period (2018 and 2019). METHODS The day of diagnosis was set as Day 0 and Cox regression models were utilized to estimate crude hazard ratios (HRs) and adjusted HRs, accounting for age, sex, cancer stage, and treatment status. Two sensitivity analyses of overall survival were performed with different cutoffs of the pre-pandemic/pandemic periods and year-to-year comparisons. Subgroup analyses were performed using likelihood ratio tests. RESULTS A total of 15,085 colorectal cancer patients were included, with 6499 eligible for follow-up. A median age of included patients was 72 years old, of which 59% were male. The distribution of cancer stages showed little variation between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. With a median follow-up of 177 days, the number of events was 316/3111 (173 events per 1000 person-years [E/1000PY], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 154-192 E/1000PY) in the pre-pandemic period, and 326/2746 (245 E/1000PY, 95% CI: 220-274 E/1000PY) in the pandemic period (crude HR: 1.42, 95% CI: 1.22-1.66; adjusted HR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.07-1.46). The two sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses consistently supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS The study revealed an increased colorectal cancer mortality during the pandemic period, suggesting a continuous impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the known and unknown risk factors for colorectal cancer for several years. Further studies are necessary to mitigate the adverse effects on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Miyamori
- Department of General Internal MedicineHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Tsukasa Kamitani
- Section of Education for Clinical ResearchKyoto University HospitalKyotoJapan
| | - Shuhei Yoshida
- Department of General Internal MedicineHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Yuya Shigenobu
- Department of General Internal MedicineHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Kotaro Ikeda
- Department of General Internal MedicineHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Yuka Kikuchi
- Department of General Internal MedicineHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
| | - Saori Kashima
- Graduate School for International Development and CooperationHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
- Environmental Health Sciences Laboratory, Graduate School of Advanced Science and EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
| | - Yosuke Yamamoto
- Department of Healthcare Epidemiology, School of Public Health in the Graduate School of MedicineKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Doeve BH, Bakx JAC, Siersema PD, Rosman C, van Grieken NCT, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Sandick JW, Verheij M, Bijlsma MF, Verhoeven RHA, van Laarhoven HWM. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, stage, and treatment of esophagogastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:965-977. [PMID: 37523094 PMCID: PMC10522512 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-023-02009-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the entire global healthcare system, including oncological care. This study investigated the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, stage, and treatment of esophagogastric cancer in the Netherlands. METHODS Patients diagnosed in 2020 were divided into 5 periods, based on the severity of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands, and compared to patients diagnosed in the same period in the years 2017-2019. Patient characteristics and treatments were evaluated for esophageal cancer (EC) and gastric cancer (GC) separately. RESULTS The number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased prominently during the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic. During this period, a significantly higher percentage of GC patients was diagnosed with incurable disease (52.5% in 2017-2019 and 67.7% in 2020, p = 0.011). We observed a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with potentially curable EC treated with resection and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (from 35.0% in 2017-2019 to 27.3% in 2020, p < 0.001). Also, patients diagnosed with incurable GC were treated less frequently with a resection (from 4.6% in 2017-2019 to 1.5% in 2020, p = 0.009) in the second half of 2020. CONCLUSIONS Compared to previous years, the number of esophagogastric cancer diagnoses decreased in the first 2 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, while an increased percentage of patients was diagnosed with incurable disease. Both in the curative and palliative setting, patients were less likely to be treated with a surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benthe H Doeve
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Oncode Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jeanne A C Bakx
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter D Siersema
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Camiel Rosman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole C T van Grieken
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Vrije Universteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mark I van Berge Henegouwen
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johanna W van Sandick
- Department of Surgery, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital - Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel Verheij
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten F Bijlsma
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine, Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Oncode Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob H A Verhoeven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Quilan F, Lequesne J, Cherifi F, Bastien E, Morel A, Delcambre C, Da Silva A, Grellard J, Leconte A, Faveyrial A, Clarisse B, Joly F. Does COVID-19 pandemic impact cancer outcomes in metastatic setting? A comparative cohort study among metastatic patients treated at day care hospital. Cancer Med 2023; 12:17603-17612. [PMID: 37492987 PMCID: PMC10523941 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION COVID-19 outbreak rapidly spread since early 2020 leading to the implementation of nationwide lockdowns. To cope with this sudden change, management guidelines were quickly published to adapt oncological care, with potential impact on cancer outcomes. METHODS We conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 on cancer outcomes in metastatic patients. Two cohorts of metastatic patients receiving intravenous (iv) therapy in a French oncological day care hospital were assessed: a 2020 cohort during the first French lockdown, and a 2018 historical cohort before the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a propensity score analysis to match patients from the two cohorts. After one-year follow-up, we compared progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between cohorts. Adaptations of medical oncological treatments in 2020 were also analysed. RESULTS The 376 patients of the 2020 cohort were matched with 376 of the 2018 cohort. No SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in the 2020 cohort. The adjusted PFS was significantly shorter in 2020 compared to 2018 (HR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.03-1.46), as well as among patients without treatment adaptation compared to matched patients of the 2018 cohort (HR = 1.33; 95% CI: 1.10-1.61). We did not observe any significant difference of PFS among the group with treatment adaptations. OS was not significantly different. CONCLUSION Metastatic cancer patients treated during the first lockdown had a higher risk of disease progression 1 year after COVID-19 outbreak. However, oncological treatment adaptations or SARS-CoV-2 infections do not explain these results. A longer follow-up is needed to observe the impact on OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Quilan
- Medical Oncology DepartmentCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
| | | | | | - Etienne Bastien
- Medical Oncology DepartmentCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
| | - Adeline Morel
- Medical Oncology DepartmentCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Florence Joly
- Medical Oncology DepartmentCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
- Clinical Research DepartmentCentre François BaclesseCaenFrance
- Anticipe (Interdisciplinary Research Unit for the Prevention and Treatment of Cancer), INSERM Unit 1086CaenFrance
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fu R, Sutradhar R, Li Q, Kamalraj P, Dare A, Hanna TP, Chan KKW, Irish JC, Coburn N, Hallet J, Singh S, Parmar A, Earle CC, Lapointe-Shaw L, Krzyzanowska MK, Louie AV, Mahar A, Urbach DR, McIsaac DI, Enepekides D, Gomez D, Look Hong NJ, Tinmouth J, Eskander A. Early survival for patients newly diagnosed with cancer during COVID-19 in Ontario, Canada: A population-based cohort study. Cancer Med 2023. [PMID: 36999960 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the association between the COVID-19 pandemic and early survival among newly diagnosed cancer patients. METHODS This retrospective population-based cohort study used linked administrative datasets from Ontario, Canada. Adults (≥18 years) who received a cancer diagnosis between March 15 and December 31, 2020, were included in a pandemic cohort, while those diagnosed during the same dates in 2018/2019 were included in a pre-pandemic cohort. All patients were followed for one full year after the date of diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess survival in relation to the pandemic, patient characteristics at diagnosis, and the modality of first cancer treatment as a time-varying covariate. Interaction terms were explored to measure the pandemic association with survival for each cancer type. RESULTS Among 179,746 patients, 53,387 (29.7%) were in the pandemic cohort and 37,741 (21.0%) died over the first post-diagnosis year. No association between the pandemic and survival was found when adjusting for patient characteristics at diagnosis (HR 0.99 [95% CI 0.96-1.01]), while marginally better survival was found for the pandemic cohort when the modality of treatment was additionally considered (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.95-0.99]). When examining each cancer type, only a new melanoma diagnosis was associated with a worse survival in the pandemic cohort (HR 1.25 [95% CI 1.05-1.49]). CONCLUSIONS Among patients able to receive a cancer diagnosis during the pandemic, one-year overall survival was not different than those diagnosed in the previous 2 years. This study highlights the complex nature of the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Fu
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rinku Sutradhar
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Qing Li
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pabiththa Kamalraj
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna Dare
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy P Hanna
- Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelvin K W Chan
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery/Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (OICR), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Simron Singh
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ambica Parmar
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Craig C Earle
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren Lapointe-Shaw
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Monika K Krzyzanowska
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyson Mahar
- School of Nursing, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - David R Urbach
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel I McIsaac
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Danny Enepekides
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Gomez
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of General Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nicole J Look Hong
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jill Tinmouth
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Odette Cancer Centre-Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Ontario Health-Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aparicio T, Layese R, Hemery F, Tournigand C, Paillaud E, De Angelis N, Quero L, Ganne N, Prat F, Pachev A, Galula G, Benderra MA, Canouï-Poitrine F. The 10-month mortality rate among older patients treated for digestive system cancer during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic: The CADIGCOVAGE multicentre cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101443. [PMID: 36709553 PMCID: PMC9883010 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 12/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had a dramatic impact on cancer diagnosis and care pathways. Here, we assessed the mid-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on older adults with cancer before, during and after the lockdown period in 2020. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study of prospectively collected electronic health records. All adults aged 65 or over and having been newly treated for a digestive system cancer in our institution between January 2018 until August 2020 were enrolled. RESULTS Data on 7,881 patients were analyzed. Although the overall 10-month mortality rate was similar in 2020 vs. 2018-2019, the mortality rate among for patients newly treated in the 2020 post-lockdown period was (after four months of follow-up) significantly higher. A subgroup analysis revealed higher mortality rates for (i) patients diagnosed in the emergency department during the pre-lockdown period, (ii) patients with small intestine cancer newly treated during the post-lockdown period, and (iii) patients having undergone surgery with curative intent during the post-lockdown period. However, when considering individuals newly treated during the lockdown period, we observed lower mortality rates for (i) patients aged 80 and over, (ii) patients with a biliary or pancreatic cancer, and (iii) patients diagnosed in the emergency department. DISCUSSION There was no overall increase in mortality among patients newly treated in 2020 vs. 2018-2019. Longer follow-up is needed to assess the consequences of the pandemic. A subgroup analysis revealed significant intergroup differences in mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, F-75010 Paris, France; Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France.
| | - Richard Layese
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health and Clinical Research department (URC Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France; Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France
| | - François Hemery
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Medical Information Departement, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France; AP-HP, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Geriatric Department, F-75015 Paris, France
| | - Nicola De Angelis
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Digestive Surgery, F-94010 Créteil, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France; AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Radiotherapy Department, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne
- AP-HP, Avicenne Hospital, Hepatology Department, F-93000 Bobigny, France
| | - Fredéric Prat
- Université de Paris, F-75000 Paris, France; AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Endoscopy Department, F-92110 Clichy, France
| | - Atanas Pachev
- AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Radiology Department, F-75010 Paris, France
| | - Gilles Galula
- AP-HP, Tenon Hospital, Medical Oncology, F-75020 Paris, France
| | | | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Public Health and Clinical Research department (URC Mondor), F-94010 Créteil, France; Univ Paris Est Creteil, INSERM, IMRB U955, F-94000 Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berrian J, Liu Y, Ezenwajiaku N, Moreno‐Aspitia A, Holton SJ, Toriola AT, Colditz GA, Housten AJ, Hall L, Fiala MA, Ademuyiwa FO. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer stage at diagnosis according to race. Cancer Med 2023; 12:7381-7388. [PMID: 36404491 PMCID: PMC10067026 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine if the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated racial disparities in late-stage presentation of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers. METHODS We conducted a registry-based retrospective study of patients with newly reported diagnoses of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers between March 2019-June 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and March 2020-June 2020 (early-COVID-19). We compared the volume of new diagnoses and stage at presentation according to race between both periods. RESULTS During the study period, a total of 3528 patients had newly diagnosed cancer; 3304 of which had known disease stages and were included in the formal analyses. 467 (14.1%) were Blacks, and 2743 were (83%) Whites. 1216 (36.8%) had breast, 415 (12.6%) had colorectal, 827 (25%) had lung, and 846 (25.6%) had prostate cancers, respectively. The pre-COVID-19 period included 2120 (64.2%), and the early-COVID-19 period included 1184 (35.8%), representing a proportional 44.2% decline in the volume of new cases of breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers, p < 0.0001. Pre-COVID-19, 16.8% were diagnosed with metastatic disease, versus 20.4% early-COVID-19, representing a proportional increase of 21.4% in the numbers of new cases with metastatic disease, p = 0.01. There was a non-significant proportional decline of 1.9% in Black patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers early-COVID-19 (p = 0.71) and a non-significant proportional increase of 7% in Black patients diagnosed with metastatic disease (p = 0.71). Difference-in-difference analyses showed no statistically significant differences in metastatic presentation comparing Black to White patients. CONCLUSION While we identified substantial reductions in the volume of new cancer diagnoses and increases in metastatic presentations due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the impact was similar for White and Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ying Liu
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lannis Hall
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Mark A. Fiala
- Washington University School of MedicineSt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gardner JG, Feld LD. The impact of COVID-19 on endoscopy and cancer screening: a focus on access and equity. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231173334. [PMID: 37180362 PMCID: PMC10172843 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231173334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The SARS-CoV2 pandemic has had a profound and lasting impact on healthcare delivery. Gastrointestinal endoscopy services were limited during the early phases of the pandemic, which has resulted in ongoing procedural backlog. Procedural delays have had continuing effects including delayed colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnoses and exacerbation of existing disparities in the CRC-screening and treatment pathways. In this review, we outline these effects as well as the variety of strategies that have been proposed to eliminate this backlog, including increased endoscopy hours, re-triaging of referrals, and alternative CRC-screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lauren D. Feld
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department
of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Domper-Arnal MJ, Hijos-Mallada G, Lanas Á. The impact of COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer patients. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2022; 15:17562848221117636. [PMID: 36035306 PMCID: PMC9403473 DOI: 10.1177/17562848221117636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has posed an unprecedented challenge to healthcare systems worldwide, causing downscaling of almost all other activities, especially in its early stages. Currently, the availability of vaccines along with the spread of new viral variants has modified the epidemiology of the disease, and the previous activity is being gradually resumed in most healthcare facilities. In this review, we have summarized the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Population-based screening with either colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests has proven to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, so screening programs have been implemented in most western countries. However, during the first COVID-19 wave, most of these programs had to be disrupted temporarily. In this review, we have thoroughly analyzed the consequences of these disruptions of screening programs as well as of the forced delays in diagnostic and therapeutic services on CRC prognosis, although its exact impact cannot be exactly measured yet. In any way, strategies to minimize its effect, such as catch-up strategies expanding the colonoscopy capacity or using fecal occult blood concentration and other risk factors to prioritize patients, are urgently needed. The COVID-19 pandemic has also led to a change in CRC patient presentation, with an overall temporary decreased incidence due to postponed diagnoses, but with more patients presenting in need of an emergency admission or with symptoms. Finally, changes in treatment approaches in CRC patients have been reported during the pandemic, namely a drop in the proportion of laparoscopic surgeries or a rise in short-term radiotherapy courses. We have therefore aimed to summarize the available evidence to guide the healthcare professionals treating CRC patients to choose the best treatment options in the current pandemic situation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ángel Lanas
- Service of Digestive Diseases, University
Clinic Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain,Aragón Health Research Institute (IIS Aragón),
Zaragoza, Spain,CIBERehd, Madrid, Spain,University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Priou S, Lamé G, Zalcman G, Wislez M, Bey R, Chatellier G, Cadranel J, Tannier X, Zelek L, Daniel C, Tournigand C, Kempf E. Influence of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on management and prognosis of new lung cancer cases, a retrospective multicenter real-life cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:33-40. [PMID: 35843177 PMCID: PMC9234022 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has impacted the care of cancer patients. This study sought to assess the pandemic’s impact on the clinical presentations and outcomes of newly referred patients with lung cancer from the Greater Paris area. Methods We retrospectively retrieved the electronic health records and administrative data of 11.4 million patients pertaining to Greater Paris University Hospital (AP-HP). We compared indicators for the 2018–2019 period to those of 2020 in regard to newly referred lung cancer cases. We assessed the initial tumour stage, the delay between the first multidisciplinary tumour board (MTB) and anticancer treatment initiation, and 6-month overall survival (OS) rates depending on the anticancer treatment, including surgery, palliative systemic treatment, and best supportive care (BSC). Result Among 6240 patients with lung cancer, 2179 (35%) underwent tumour resection, 2069 (33%) systemic anticancer therapy, 775 (12%) BSC, whereas 1217 (20%) did not receive any treatment. During the first lockdown, the rate of new diagnoses decreased by 32% compared with that recorded in 2018–2019. Initial tumour stage, repartition of patients among treatment categories, and MTB-related delays remained unchanged. The 6-month OS rates of patients diagnosed in 2018–2019 who underwent tumour resection were 98% versus 97% (HR = 1.2; 95% CI: 0.7–2.0) for those diagnosed in 2020; the respective rates for patients who underwent systemic anticancer therapy were 78% versus 79% (HR = 1.0; 95% CI: 0.8–1.2); these rates were 20% versus 13% (HR = 1.3; 95% CI: 1.1–1.6) for those who received BSC. COVID-19 was associated with poorer OS rates (HR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.6–3.0) for patients who received systemic anticancer therapy. Conclusions The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has not exerted any deleterious impact on 6-month OS of new lung cancer patients that underwent active anticancer therapy in Greater Paris University hospitals.
Collapse
|
12
|
Lucarini A, Garbarino GM, Orlandi P, Garofalo E, Bragaglia L, Laracca GG, Canali G, Pecoraro A, Mercantini P. From “Cure” to “Care”: The Role of the MultiDisciplinary Team on Colorectal Cancer Patients’ Satisfaction and Oncological Outcomes. J Multidiscip Healthc 2022; 15:1415-1426. [PMID: 35785259 PMCID: PMC9249348 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s362550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio Lucarini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
- Correspondence: Alessio Lucarini, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy, Email
| | - Giovanni Maria Garbarino
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Orlandi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Eleonora Garofalo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bragaglia
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Canali
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandra Pecoraro
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Mercantini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|