Association between medical androgen deprivation therapy and long-term cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in non-metastatic prostate cancer

Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, therapeutics and prevention strategies

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease is high in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC). Survivorship of PC patients is often determined by cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our review synthesizes the most recent literature exploring the dynamics between PC and CVD across the disease trajectory and treatments. We review key ongoing clinical trials in the field and highlight avenues for future study.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the literature using various search strategies in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov), focusing on literature published between 2000 and 2024.

RESULTS

We discuss the significance of CVD-related mortality in PC, review the risk factors, and highlight potential mechanisms for accelerated CVD in the androgen-deprivation setting. Furthermore, we summarize key literature of CVD and cardiotoxicity for various therapeutic approaches in PC, including orchiectomy, taxane-based chemotherapy, GnRH-axis targets, and next-generation hormonal agents and PARP inhibitors. Lastly, we discuss prevention strategies and the importance of multi-disciplinary care in this setting.

CONCLUSION

CVD is a major cause of death in men with PC. Various novel therapeutic approaches have been pivotal in improving oncologic outcomes, but emerging data demonstrate a complex interplay between the androgen axis and CVD that is likely affected by modern treatment strategies. Given the prolonged PC survivorship, unraveling non-oncologic related causes of death and investigating prevention strategies are imperative (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 LANDSCAPE OF PROSTATE CANCER.: Spectrum of prostate cancer disease states (red) and interventions (yellow) with the potential role for optimization (green) to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the future (blue).

Comparative Cardiovascular Risks of Radical Prostatectomy and External Beam Radiation Therapy in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

The risk of cardiac disease mortality has recently become a focal point of concern within the medical community for patients with prostate cancer (PCa). Given that radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) are the main treatment modalities for localized PCa, their specific impact on cardiovascular-specific mortality (CSM) remains unclear. This study explored the specific effects of RP and EBRT on CSM risk to guide clinical treatment decisions.

METHODS

Data from patients aged 45-74 years, who were diagnosed with T1-2N0M0 stage PCa from the SEER database (2010-2015), were used. Multivariate statistical methods, including propensity score matching (PSM), competing risk regression, COX regression analysis, and Fine-Gray testing, were applied to assess the impact of RP and EBRT on CSM risk.

RESULTS

Among 146,082 T1-2 stage PCa patients, cardiac disease emerged as the primary cause of death, surpassing PCa itself. Multifactorial COX regression and competing risk regression analyses indicated that local treatments do not increase CSM risk. Further analysis revealed a significant increase in CSM risk for patients undergoing only EBRT compared with those undergoing only RP (hazard ratio [HR]  = 2.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.96-3.74, P < 0.001), with subsequent PSM adjustment, further confirming a significantly reduced risk in the RP treatment group (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13-0.40, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

T1-2 stage PCa patients face a significant risk of CSM, with RP offering a potential advantage over EBRT in reducing this risk. These findings encourage clinicians to comprehensively consider the potential impact on cardiac health when formulating treatment plans, providing crucial guidance for optimizing treatment strategies.

Clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer and evaluation based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

Objective

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of different androgen deprivation therapies for prostate cancer (PCa) based on dynamic-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI).

Methods

104 patients with PCa were studied, all of whom were treated with androgen deprivation therapy. The patients were divided into a continuous group (continuous androgen deprivation therapy) and an intermittent group (intermittent androgen deprivation therapy) by random number table method, 52 cases/group. The therapeutic effect and DCE-MRI indices were compared and the relationship between DCE-MRI indices and clinical efficacy and the evaluation value of therapeutic efficacy were analyzed.

Results

The objective response rate (ORR) of the intermittent group was higher than that of the continuous group (p < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in disease control rate (DCR) between the two groups (p > 0.05). After treatment, volume transfer coefficient (Ktrans), reverse transfer constant (Kep), volume fraction (Ve), blood volume (BV), and blood flow (BF) in both groups were lowered, and those in the intermittent group were lower than the continuous group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV in the ORR group were lower than those in the non-ORR group (p < 0.05). Ktrans, Kep, Ve, BF, and BV were correlated with the therapeutic effect of PCa (p < 0.05). The AUC value of the combined detection of DCE-MRI indices in evaluating the therapeutic effect of PCa was greater than that of each index alone (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with continuous androgen deprivation therapy, intermittent androgen deprivation therapy has better clinical efficacy in the treatment of PCa, and DCE-MRI indices are related to the treatment efficacy of PCa and have an evaluation value.

Cardiovascular disease burden in patients with urological cancers: The new discipline of uro-cardio-oncology

Cancer remains a major cause of mortality worldwide, and urological cancers are the most common cancers among men. Several therapeutic agents have been used to treat urological cancer, leading to improved survival for patients. However, this has been accompanied by an increase in the frequency of survivors with cardiovascular complications caused by anticancer medications. Here, we propose the novel discipline of uro-cardio-oncology, an evolving subspecialty focused on the complex interactions between cardiovascular disease and urological cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the various cardiovascular toxicities induced by different classes of antineoplastic agents used to treat urological cancers, including androgen deprivation therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and chemotherapeutics. In addition, we discuss possible mechanisms underlying the cardiovascular toxicity associated with anticancer therapy and outline strategies for the surveillance, diagnosis, and effective management of cardiovascular complications. Finally, we provide an analysis of future perspectives in this emerging specialty, identifying areas in need of further research.

Risk of cardiovascular death in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma based on the Fine-Gray model

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common types of cancers worldwide, ranking fifth among men and seventh among women, resulting in more than 7 million deaths annually. With the development of medical technology, the 5-year survival rate of HCC patients can be increased to 70%. However, HCC patients are often at increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) death due to exposure to potentially cardiotoxic treatments compared with non-HCC patients. Moreover, CVD and cancer have become major disease burdens worldwide. Thus, further research is needed to lessen the risk of CVD death in HCC patient survivors.

AIM

To determine the independent risk factors for CVD death in HCC patients and predict cardiovascular mortality (CVM) in HCC patients.

METHODS

This study was conducted on the basis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and included HCC patients with a diagnosis period from 2010 to 2015. The independent risk factors were identified using the Fine-Gray model. A nomograph was constructed to predict the CVM in HCC patients. The nomograph performance was measured using Harrell's concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) value. Moreover, the net benefit was estimated via decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The study included 21545 HCC patients, of whom 619 died of CVD. Age (< 60) [1.981 (1.573-2.496), P < 0.001], marital status (married) [unmarried: 1.370 (1.076-1.745), P = 0.011], alpha fetoprotein (normal) [0.778 (0.640-0.946), P = 0.012], tumor size (≤ 2 cm) [(2, 5] cm: 1.420 (1.060-1.903), P = 0.019; > 5 cm: 2.090 (1.543-2.830), P < 0.001], surgery (no) [0.376 (0.297-0.476), P < 0.001], and chemotherapy(none/unknown) [0.578 (0.472-0.709), P < 0.001] were independent risk factors for CVD death in HCC patients. The discrimination and calibration of the nomograph were better. The C-index values for the training and validation sets were 0.736 and 0.665, respectively. The AUC values of the ROC curves at 2, 4, and 6 years were 0.702, 0.725, 0.740 in the training set and 0.697, 0.710, 0.744 in the validation set, respectively. The calibration curves showed that the predicted probabilities of the CVM prediction model in the training set vs the validation set were largely consistent with the actual probabilities. DCA demonstrated that the prediction model has a high net benefit.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors for CVD death in HCC patients were investigated for the first time. The nomograph served as an important reference tool for relevant clinical management decisions.

Addressing the risk and management of cardiometabolic complications in prostate cancer patients on androgen deprivation therapy and androgen receptor axis-targeted therapy: consensus statements from the Hong Kong Urological Association and the Hong Kong Society of Uro-Oncology

Background

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the foundational treatment for metastatic prostate cancer (PCa). Androgen receptor (AR) axis-targeted therapies are a new standard of care for advanced PCa. Although these agents have significantly improved patient survival, the suppression of testosterone is associated with an increased risk of cardiometabolic syndrome. This highlights the urgency of multidisciplinary efforts to address the cardiometabolic risk of anticancer treatment in men with PCa.

Methods

Two professional organizations invited five urologists, five clinical oncologists, and two cardiologists to form a consensus panel. They reviewed the relevant literature obtained by searching PubMed for the publication period from April 2013 to April 2023, to address three discussion areas: (i) baseline assessment and screening for risk factors in PCa patients before the initiation of ADT and AR axis-targeted therapies; (ii) follow-up and management of cardiometabolic complications; and (iii) selection of ADT agents among high-risk patients. The panel convened four meetings to discuss and draft consensus statements using a modified Delphi method. Each drafted statement was anonymously voted on by every panelist.

Results

The panel reached a consensus on 18 statements based on recent evidence and expert insights.

Conclusion

These consensus statements serve as a practical recommendation for clinicians in Hong Kong, and possibly the Asia-Pacific region, in the management of cardiometabolic toxicities of ADT or AR axis-targeted therapies in men with PCa.

Insights Into the Cardiomodulatory Effects of Sex Hormones: Implications in Transgender Care

Transgender individuals that undergo gender-affirming hormone therapy may experience discrimination in the health care setting with a lack of access to medical personnel competent in transgender medicine. Recent evidence suggests that gender-affirming hormone therapy is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and cardiovascular risk factors. A recent statement from the American Heart Association reinforces the importance of cardiovascular-focused clinical management and the necessity for more research into the impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy. With this in mind, this review will highlight the known cardiovascular risk factors associated with gender-affirming hormone therapy and identify potential molecular mechanisms determined from the limited animal studies that explore the role of cross-sex steroids on cardiovascular risk. The lack of data in this understudied population requires future clinical and basic research studies to inform and educate clinicians and their transgender patient population to promote precision medicine for their care to improve their quality of life.

Long-term risks of cardiovascular death in a population-based cohort of 1,141,675 older patients with cancer

BACKGROUND

previous studies have focused on the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD)-related death in individual cancers, adolescents or all cancers.

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate the risk of CVD-related death in older patients with cancer.

METHODS

older patients with cancer (over 65 years) of 16 cancers diagnosed between 1975 and 2018 were screened out from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program. The proportion of deaths, competing risk regression models, standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and absolute excess risks (AERs) were used to assess the risk of CVD-related death.

RESULTS

this study included 1,141,675 older patients (median follow-up: 13.5 years). Of the 16 individual cancers, the risk of CVD death exceeded primary neoplasm death in older patients with cancers of the breast, endometrium, vulva, prostate gland, penis and melanoma of the skin over time (high competing risk group). Compared to the general older population, older patients with cancer had higher SMR and AER of CVD-related death (SMR: 1.58-4.23; AER: 21.16-365.89), heart disease-related death (SMR: 1.14-4.16; AER: 16.29-301.68) and cerebrovascular disease-related death (SMR: 1.11-4.66; AER: 3.02-72.43), with the SMR trend varying with CVD-related death competing risk classifications. The risk of CVD-related death in the high-competing risk group was higher than in the low-competing risk group.

CONCLUSIONS

for older patients with cancer, six of 16 individual cancers, including breast, endometrium, vulva, prostate gland, penis and melanoma of the skin was at high risk of CVD-related death. Management for long-term cardiovascular risk in older patients with cancer is needed.