1
|
Kolesnikova V, Revishchin A, Fab L, Alekseeva A, Ryabova A, Pronin I, Usachev DY, Kopylov A, Pavlova G. GQIcombi application to subdue glioma via differentiation therapy. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1322795. [PMID: 38988707 PMCID: PMC11233813 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1322795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Current therapy protocols fail to cure high-grade gliomas and prevent recurrence. Therefore, novel approaches need to be developed. A re-programing of glioma cell fate is an alternative attractive way to stop tumor growth. The two-step protocol applies the antiproliferative GQ bi-(AID-1-T) and small molecule inducers with BDNF to trigger neural differentiation into terminally differentiated cells, and it is very effective on GB cell cultures. This original approach is a successful example of the "differentiation therapy". To demonstrate a versatility of this approach, in this publication we have extended a palette of cell cultures to gliomas of II, III and IV Grades, and proved an applicability of that version of differential therapy for a variety of tumor cells. We have justified a sequential mode of adding of GQIcombi components to the glioma cells. We have shown a significant retardation of tumor growth after a direct injection of GQIcombi into the tumor in rat brain, model 101/8. Thus, the proposed strategy of influencing on cancer cell growth is applicable to be further translated for therapy use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varvara Kolesnikova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander Revishchin
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Lika Fab
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Anna Alekseeva
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
- Laboratory of Neuromorphology, Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of Federal State Budgetary Scientific Institution “Petrovsky National Research Centre of Surgery”, Moscow, Russia
| | - Anastasia Ryabova
- Natural Sciences Center of Prokhorov General Physics Institute Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
| | - Igor Pronin
- Federal State Autonomous Institution «N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Dmitry Y. Usachev
- Federal State Autonomous Institution «N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexey Kopylov
- Chemistry Department, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Galina Pavlova
- Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Genetics Development, Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Moscow, Russia
- Federal State Autonomous Institution «N. N. Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery» of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
- Department of Medical Genetics, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saunthararajah Y. Oncotherapy resistance explained by Darwinian and Lamarckian models. J Clin Invest 2024; 134:e179788. [PMID: 38618954 PMCID: PMC11014649 DOI: 10.1172/jci179788] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Cell and antibody therapies directed against surface molecules on B cells, e.g., CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CD19 CAR-T), are now standard for patients with chemorefractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias and other B cell malignancies. However, early relapse rates remain high. In this issue of the JCI, Aminov, Giricz, and colleagues revealed that leukemia cells resisting CD19-targeted therapy had reduced CD19 but also low CD22 expression and were sensitive to Bruton's tyrosine kinase and/or MEK inhibition. Overall, their observations support the evolution of resistance following a Lamarckian model: the oncotherapy directly elicits adaptive, resistance-conferring reconfigurations, which are then inherited by daughter cells as epigenetic changes. The findings prompt reflection also on the broader role of epigenetics in decoupling of replication from lineage differentiation activation by the B cell lineage master transcription factor hub. Such oncogenesis and resistance mechanisms, being predictable and epigenetic, offer practical opportunities for intervention, potentially non-cross-resistant and safe vis-à-vis present cytotoxic and CAR-T treatments.
Collapse
|
3
|
Biswas S, Kang K, Ng KP, Radivoyevitch T, Schalper K, Zhang H, Lindner DJ, Thomas A, MacPherson D, Gastman B, Schrump DS, Wong KK, Velcheti V, Saunthararajah Y. Neuroendocrine lineage commitment of small cell lung cancers can be leveraged into p53-independent non-cytotoxic therapy. Cell Rep 2023; 42:113016. [PMID: 37597186 PMCID: PMC10528072 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.113016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Small cell lung cancers (SCLCs) rapidly resist cytotoxic chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments. New, non-cross-resistant therapies are thus needed. SCLC cells are committed into neuroendocrine lineage then maturation arrested. Implicating DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) in the maturation arrests, we find (1) the repression mark methylated CpG, written by DNMT1, is retained at suppressed neuroendocrine-lineage genes, even as other repression marks are erased; (2) DNMT1 is recurrently amplified, whereas Ten-Eleven-Translocation 2 (TET2), which functionally opposes DNMT1, is deleted; (3) DNMT1 is recruited into neuroendocrine-lineage master transcription factor (ASCL1, NEUROD1) hubs in SCLC cells; and (4) DNMT1 knockdown activated ASCL1-target genes and released SCLC cell-cycling exits by terminal lineage maturation, which are cycling exits that do not require the p53/apoptosis pathway used by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Inhibiting DNMT1/corepressors with clinical compounds accordingly extended survival of mice with chemorefractory and ICI-refractory, p53-null, disseminated SCLC. Lineage commitment of SCLC cells can hence be leveraged into non-cytotoxic therapy able to treat chemo/ICI-refractory SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sudipta Biswas
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kai Kang
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kwok Peng Ng
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Tomas Radivoyevitch
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Kurt Schalper
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - Hua Zhang
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Langone-Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Daniel J Lindner
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Anish Thomas
- Experimental Therapeutics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | - Brian Gastman
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - David S Schrump
- Thoracic Epigenetics Section, Thoracic Surgery Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Kwok-Kin Wong
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Langone-Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Vamsidhar Velcheti
- Thoracic Oncology Program, Langone-Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA.
| | - Yogen Saunthararajah
- Department of Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA; Department of Hematology and Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Knebel Doeberitz NV, Kroh F, Breitling J, König L, Maksimovic S, Graß S, Adeberg S, Scherer M, Unterberg A, Bendszus M, Wick W, Bachert P, Debus J, Ladd ME, Schlemmer HP, Korzowski A, Goerke S, Paech D. CEST Imaging of the APT and ssMT predict the overall survival of patients with glioma at the first follow-up after completion of radiotherapy at 3T. Radiother Oncol 2023; 184:109694. [PMID: 37150450 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Outcome prediction of patients with glioma early after the completion of radiotherapy represents a major clinical challenge. Previously, the prognostic value of chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging has been demonstrated in patients with newly diagnosed glioma. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of amide proton transfer (APT)-, relayed nuclear Overhauser effect (rNOE)- and semi-solid magnetization transfer (ssMT)-imaging according to Zhou et al. (APTwasym), Goerke et al. (MTRRexAPT, MTRRexNOE and MTRRexMT) and Mehrabian et al. (PeakAreaAPT, PeakAreaNOE and MTconst) for the prognostication of the overall survival (OS) of patients with glioma at the first follow-up after the completion of radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS 49 of 72 participants with diffuse glioma, who underwent CEST MRI at 3T between July 2018 and December 2021 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy, were analyzed. Contrast-enhancing tumor (CE) and whole tumor (WT) volumes were segmented on T2w-FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1w images. Kaplan-Meier analysis and logrank-test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS APTw imaging demonstrated the strongest association with OS (HR=4.66, p<0.001). The MTconst (HR=2.54, p=0.044) was associated with the OS of participants with residual contrast-enhancing glioma tissue, whilst the MTRRexAPT (HR=2.44, p=0.056) showed a trend in this sub-cohort. The MTRRexNOE, MTRRexMT and PeakAreaNOE were not associated with survival. CONCLUSION Imaging of the APT and ssMT at the first follow-up 4 to 6 weeks after the completion of radiotherapy at 3T were associated with the overall survival of patients with glioma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Florian Kroh
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Breitling
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Laila König
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Srdjan Maksimovic
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Svenja Graß
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Adeberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Moritz Scherer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Bendszus
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Wick
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Bachert
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Mark E Ladd
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heinz-Peter Schlemmer
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Korzowski
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Goerke
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daniel Paech
- Division of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Comparative Experimental Study of Sodium and Magnesium Dichloroacetate Effects on Pediatric PBT24 and SF8628 Cell Glioblastoma Tumors Using a Chicken Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model and on Cells In Vitro. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms231810455. [PMID: 36142368 PMCID: PMC9499689 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231810455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Revised: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
In this study, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-1 inhibition with dichloroacetate (DCA) was explored as an alternative cancer therapy. The study’s aim was to compare the effectiveness of NaDCA and MgDCA on pediatric glioblastoma PBT24 and SF8628 tumors and cells. The treatment effects were evaluated on xenografts growth on a chicken embryo chorioallantoic membrane. The PCNA, EZH2, p53, survivin expression in tumor, and the SLC12A2, SLC12A5, SLC5A8, CDH1, and CDH2 expression in cells were studied. The tumor groups were: control, cells treated with 10 mM and 5 mM of NaDCA, and 5 mM and 2.5 mM of MgDCA. The cells were also treated with 3 mM DCA. Both the 10 mM DCA preparations significantly reduced PBT24 and SF8624 tumor invasion rates, while 5 mM NaDCA reduced it only in the SF8628 tumors. The 5 mM MgDCA inhibited tumor-associated neoangiogenesis in PBT24; both doses of NaDCA inhibited tumor-associated neoangiogenesis in SF8628. The 10 mM DCA inhibited the expression of markers tested in PBT24 and SF8628 tumors, but the 5 mM DCA affect on their expression depended on the cation. The DCA treatment did not affect the SLC12A2, SLC12A5, and SLC5A8 expression in cells but increased CDH1 expression in SF8628. The tumor response to DCA at different doses indicated that a contrast between NaDCA and MgDCA effectiveness reflects the differences in the tested cells’ biologies.
Collapse
|