Selection and reporting of outcome measures used in long-term follow-up studies of children and adolescents with chronic pain: A scoping review

The aim of this review was to determine the range of outcomes reported in long-term follow-up studies of children and adolescents with chronic pain. Using a scoping review methodology, a systematic search for studies reporting outcomes in children and adolescents with chronic pain over a ≥12 month period was undertaken. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they included children and adolescents (≤18 years old on study enrolment) with chronic pain, and outcomes were followed up for ≥12 months. Overall, 42 studies investigating more than 24,132 children were included in the review. Studies assessed a total of 187 unique outcome measures within the broader measures of pain (38 studies; 90%), function (33 studies; 79%) and other (21 studies; 50%). Unidimensional assessments of the severity or presence of pain and global assessments of function were the most commonly reported outcome measures. The number of study follow-up points ranged from 1 to 5, with mode duration of follow-up 12 months post intervention (25 studies; 60%; range 1-13 years). Overall, we identified a wide range of reported outcome measures in studies of children with chronic pain. Beyond assessments of pain intensity and global function, there is little consistency, and reporting of developmental outcome measures is poor. Further long-term outcome research in this population is needed.

Clusters of facilitatory and inhibitory conditioned pain modulation responses in a large sample of children, adolescents, and young adults with chronic pain

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Findings from the current study add to the literature by describing different clinical phenotypes of central pain mechanisms of youth with chronic pain.

Introduction:

When investigating the role of facilitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms such as conditioned pain modulation (CPM) and temporal summation of pain (TSP), it is important to take both into consideration in a single experimental model to provide the most information on subgroups of patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify subgroups in a large population of pediatric patients with chronic pain based on their facilitatory and inhibitory pain mechanisms and compare them with control subjects.

Methods:

Five hundred twenty-one female subjects and 147 male subjects between 8 and 21 years old underwent a CPM assessment using a 2-minute tonic noxious heat stimulation as the test stimulus and a 2-minute cold-pressor task (CPT) (12°C) as the conditioning stimulus.

Results:

The best partition of clusters of patients was 3 clusters accounting for 27.15% of the total variation in the data. Cluster 1 (n = 271) was best characterized by high pain intensity during the CPT, lack of TSP during the test stimuli, and efficient inhibitory CPM. Cluster 2 (n = 186) was best characterized by low pain intensity during the CPT, lack of TSP during the test stimuli, and efficient inhibitory CPM. Cluster 3 (n = 151) was best characterized by high pain intensity during the CPT, presence of TSP during the test stimuli, and inefficient inhibitory CPM.

Discussion:

A single thermal CPM experimental design can identify combinations of facilitatory and inhibitory pain modulation responses. Findings from the current study add to the literature by describing different clinical phenotypes of central pain mechanisms of youth with chronic pain.

Identifying Chronic Pain Subgroups in Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease: A Cluster-Analytic Approach

OBJECTIVES

Youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) and chronic pain, defined in this study as pain on most days for 3 months, experience variability in daily pain and physical and psychosocial functioning. This study aimed to (1) empirically derive chronic pain subgroups based on pain characteristics among youth with chronic SCD pain; and (2) investigate derived subgroups for differences in sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and psychosocial and functional outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Youth with chronic SCD pain (n=62, Mage =13.9, SD=2.5, 10 to 18 y; 58% female, 60% HbSS) completed a battery of questionnaires. Clinical characteristics (eg, medications, treatments) and health care utilization were abstracted from electronic medical records. Hierarchical cluster analysis informed the number of clusters at the patient level. k-means cluster analysis used multidimensional pain assessment to identify and assign patients to clusters.

RESULTS

Cluster 1 (n=35; Moderate Frequency, Moderate Pain) demonstrated significantly lower worst pain intensity, number of pain days per month, number of body sites affected by pain, and pain quality ratings. Cluster 2 (n=27; Almost Daily, High Pain) reported high ratings of worst pain intensity, almost daily to daily pain, greater number of body sites affected by pain, and higher ratings of pain quality (all P 's <0.05). There were no differences between subgroups by sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, or health care utilization. The Almost Daily, High Pain subgroup reported significantly higher pain interference, depressive symptoms, and pain catastrophizing than the Moderate Frequency, Moderate Pain subgroup.

DISCUSSION

Identifying chronic SCD pain subgroups may inform tailored assessment and intervention to mitigate poor pain and functional outcomes.

Phenotyping Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain in Male and Female Adolescents: Psychosocial Profiles, Somatosensory Profiles and Pain Modulatory Profiles

Purpose

A major limitation in treatment outcomes for chronic pain is the heterogeneity of the population. Therefore, a personalized approach to the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with chronic pain conditions is needed. The objective of the study was to subgroup pediatric patients with chronic MSK pain that will be phenotypically different from each other based on their psychosocial profile, somatosensory function, and pain modulation.

Patients and Methods

This observational cohort study recruited 302 adolescents (10–18 years) with chronic musculoskeletal pain and 80 age-matched controls. After validated self-report questionnaires on psychosocial factors were completed, quantitative sensory tests (QST) and conditioned pain modulation (CPM) were performed.

Results

Three psychosocial subgroups were identified: adaptive pain (n=125), high pain dysfunctional (n=115), high somatic symptoms (n=62). Based on QST, four somatosensory profiles were observed: normal QST (n=155), thermal hyperalgesia (n=98), mechanical hyperalgesia (n=34) and sensory loss (n=15). Based on CPM and temporal summation of pain (TSP), four distinct groups were formed, dysfunctional central processing group (n=27) had suboptimal CPM and present TSP, dysfunctional inhibition group (n=136) had suboptimal CPM and absent TSP, facilitation group (n=18) had optimal CPM and present TSP, and functional central processing (n=112) had optimal CPM and absent TSP. A significant association between the psychosocial and somatosensory profiles. However, no association was observed between the psychosocial or somatosensory profiles and pain modulatory profiles.

Conclusion

Our results provide evidence that adolescents with chronic musculoskeletal pain are a heterogenous population comprising subgroups that may reflect distinct mechanisms and may benefit from different treatment approaches. The combination of screening self-reported questionnaires, QST, and CPM facilitate subgrouping of adolescents with chronic MSK pain in the clinical context and may ultimately contribute to personalized therapy.

Psychosocial and psychophysical assessment in pediatric patients and young adults with chronic back pain: a cluster analysis

Background

Identifying subgroups with different clinical profiles may inform tailored management and improve outcomes. The objective of this study was to identify psychosocial and psychophysical profiles of children and adolescents with chronic back pain.

Methods

One hundred and ninety‐eight patients with chronic back pain were recruited for the study. Pain assessment was mainly conducted in the form of an interview and with the use of validated pain‐related questionnaires assessing their psychosocial factors and disability. All patients underwent mechanical and thermal quantitative sensory tests assessing detection and pain thresholds, and conditioned pain modulation efficacy.

Results

Hierarchal clustering partitioned our patients into three clusters accounting for 34.73% of the total variation of the data. The adaptive cluster represented 45.5% of the patients and was characterized to display high thermal and pressure pain thresholds. The high somatic symptoms cluster, representing 19.2% of patients, was characterized to use more sensory, affective, evaluative and temporal descriptors of pain, more likely to report their pain as neuropathic of nature, report a more functional disability, report symptoms of anxiety and depression and report poor sleep quality. The pain‐sensitive cluster, representing 35.4% of the cohort, displayed deep tissue sensitivity and thermal hyperalgesia.

Conclusions

This study identified clinical profiles of children and adolescents experiencing chronic back pain based on specific psychophysical and psychosocial characteristics highlighting that chronic pain treatment should address underlying nociceptive and non‐nociceptive mechanisms.

Significance

To our current knowledge, this study is the first to conduct cluster analysis with youth experiencing chronic back pain and displays clinical profiles based on specific physical and psychosocial characteristics. This study highlights that in a clinical context, chronic pain assessment should include multiple elements contributing to pain which can be assessed in a clinical context and addressed when pathoanatomical symptoms are unidentifiable.

Is It Worth It? A Comparison of an Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment and a Multimodal Treatment for Youths With Pain-related Disability

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive interdisciplinary pain treatment (IIPT) day-hospital program as compared with an outpatient multimodal treatment (MMT) for youth with chronic pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nonrandomized pretest posttest with control group design was used. A battery of patient-oriented measures assessing pain interference, quality of life, and depressive symptoms were completed at treatment commencement and at 3, 6, and 12 months after treatment by 44 youths enrolled in the IIPT and 138 youths engaged in the MMT, with various chronic pain conditions. Data were analyzed using longitudinal mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

The main outcomes were the score difference from baseline of patient-oriented measures across 3 timepoints within 12 months of intervention initiation for both treatment groups. IIPT participants demonstrated greater improvement in pain interference, as compared with MMT at 3 and 12 months. Initially, health-related quality of life scores improved similarly in both groups, but greater improvement was seen in the MMT group at 12 months. Depressive symptom scores did not improve with either intervention. Only pain interference scores reached statistically and clinically significant difference levels.

DISCUSSION

This study supports the benefits of specialized rehabilitation interventions, including both MMT and IIPT programs, for youths with chronic pain. The findings also suggest that IIPT might have a greater long-term effect for helping youths, in particular those with high pain interference scores.

Exploring the Prevalence of Pediatric Chronic Pain and School Absenteeism for Therapists Working in Schools: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

AIM

To explore the prevalence of school absenteeism for children with chronic pain and to identify the characteristics of children with chronic pain who report absenteeism.

METHODS

Systematic review with meta-analyses of quantitative studies. Studies were included if they reported mean days absent from school in children with chronic pain aged 5-18 years, attending a full-time school program. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Participant characteristics of age, gender, pain duration, pain type, and data collection setting were collated.

RESULTS

Eighteen quantitative studies involving 2963 children with chronic were included. Studies had moderate to high quality of evidence. Meta-analysis demonstrated 13.28 mean days were spent absent from school in a 60-day period (95% CI 10.21, 16.34) (p < 0.001). Participants were predominantly females (71.8%) aged 14.1 years (SD 2.32). The most experienced pain type was combined headache or head pain (46.9%) and average duration since pain onset was 32.5 months (SD 36.34).

CONCLUSIONS

Children with chronic pain aged 5-18 years are absent for approximately 22% of school days, in a 60-day period. Early, targeted intervention for absenteeism and poor school functioning is recommended. Future research could evaluate the role of school-based therapists in screening at risk students and improving attendance and outcomes.

[Chronic primary pain disorders in children and adolescents]

AIM

Chronic and debilitating pediatric pain has a prevalence of 5% and as such constitutes a considerable health problem. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of current research activities on pediatric pain, available health care for children with chronic pain and education and training programs for health professionals.

METHOD

This overview is based on the authors' personal experience, information available from medical, research and professional associations, as well as a PubMed literature search for the time period 2012-2015 using "children";"pain" and "Germany" as search terms.

RESULTS

There are numerous research activities in Germany focusing on the epidemiology, the underlying psychobiological mechanisms and on the multimodal treatment of chronic pediatric pain. This research is internationally widely acknowledged and makes a significant contribution to current developments in pediatric pain research. By contrast, health services and basic science research is clearly lacking in Germany. Moreover, specialized health care for youth with chronic pain is far less institutionalized when compared to adults suffering from chronic pain. Indeed, primary and secondary care services have rarely been studied or even evaluated.

CONCLUSION

Similar to international trends, research on chronic pediatric pain has also grown and advanced in Germany. Indeed, not only the amount of research has increased but also its scope. Nonetheless, there is clearly a need for more research efforts with regard to the understanding of (pediatric) pain mechanisms, clinical studies and, especially, investigations on health care services. It is particularly important to focus on the implementation, improvement and systematic evaluation of specialized health care services which would be available and accessible for children and adolescents with chronic pain and not be restricted to tertiary care.

Clinical Phenotyping of Youth With New-Onset Musculoskeletal Pain: A Controlled Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

The course of pediatric musculoskeletal pain from acute to chronic has not been well described and there is limited understanding of how to identify individuals with new-onset pain who may be predisposed to developing persisting symptoms. Thus, the purpose of this study was to describe the clinical phonotype of treatment-seeking youth with new-onset musculoskeletal pain compared with youth with and without chronic pain. Further, we tested predictors of pain-related disability and pain sensitivity in the new-onset pain sample.

METHODS

Participants were 191 youth, ages 10 to 17 years, representing 3 cohorts (new-onset musculoskeletal pain, chronic musculoskeletal pain, and a comparison group without chronic pain). Participants completed questionnaire measures of pain characteristics, psychological functioning, sleep, and pain-related disability. They also attended a laboratory visit to complete an experimental pain assessment using heat and cold stimuli to assess pain sensitivity and conditioned pain modulation.

RESULTS

Findings revealed youth with new-onset musculoskeletal pain had a distinct clinical phenotype where symptoms of pain and disability were in the mid-range between those of youth with diagnosed chronic musculoskeletal pain and youth in the community without chronic pain. Linear regressions within the new-onset pain sample demonstrated poorer sleep quality and higher pain fear predicted greater pain-related disability, and pain catastrophizing predicted cold pressor sensitivity.

DISCUSSION

Clinical phenotyping of youth with new-onset musculoskeletal pain highlights factors relevant to the pain experience. Future research can examine the roles of these variables in predicting longitudinal risk for chronic pain and disability.

[Pediatric general practitioners and tertiary care structures for pain therapy. A qualitative study on the need for networking]

BACKGROUND

Despite the urgency of the problem of chronic pediatric pain and the importance of early interventions, many children experience intermittent episodes of pain over a long period of time. One aim of this study was to investigate the need of structured diagnostic tools and therapies of chronic pediatric pain in pediatric general practices. Another aim was to describe the aims, services and challenges of a network between pediatric practices and a tertiary pediatric pain centre, from the perspective of general pediatric practitioners.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A qualitative research design was selected and 20 general pediatric practitioners were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Interviews were analyzed by use of qualitative content analysis according to Mayring.

RESULTS

Generally, the idea of a network between pediatric practices and the German Pediatric Pain Centre was rated positively by pediatric general practitioners. From the results of the analysis three categories were identified: (i) expectations from the network (ii) desire for cooperation in the network and (iii) recommendations for improved patient care.

CONCLUSION

A network with a centre for tertiary care was preferred by the general pediatric practitioners. To optimize the care of children with chronic pain further education for general pediatric practitioners as well as structured diagnostic tools and therapies of frequent pediatric chronic pain diseases are warranted.

[Multidisciplinary management of children with disabling chronic pain in a French pediatric rehabilitation center: Current management and perspectives]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic pain in children and adolescents has a major impact on their life in terms of school, sleep as well as family and social life. Teenagers aged 13-15 and girls are at the highest risk. Zeltzer et al. established a bio-psychosocial model of chronic pain in 1998 to account for all its dimensions and advocated a multidisciplinary management plan. Programs based on their principles target specific symptoms such as anxiety and loss of function, while treating underlying factors and teaching coping skills to patients and their families. They aim for patients to regain autonomy rather than focusing on pain resolution. Such programs, with varied protocols, have existed outside of France for approximately 15 years. The efficacy of these multidisciplinary programs has been shown in studies in Germany, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada, and Australia. To our knowledge, there are no French studies on this topic; therefore, our aim was to describe a French program. We hypothesized that the program would be effective in reducing chronic pain and its impact.

METHODS

The aim of this study was to describe the multidisciplinary management of chronic pain in a French pediatric functional rehabilitation center. It is a public health establishment located in the suburbs of Lille, offering care for children aged 0-18 with various conditions. It has 52 hospital beds, can accommodate up to 22 day-hospital visits per day and has comprehensive technical facilities. This prospective study consisted in a chart review of all consecutive patients who were hospitalized in the functional rehabilitation center for chronic pain with significant disability since 2010. We reviewed the treatment protocol for each patient as well as the treatment results for the composite primary endpoint, comprising pain characteristics and the impact of pain on function and schooling after discharge.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients, aged 9.4-17.8 years, 62.1% of whom were girls, were hospitalized for chronic pain with a significant impact on their daily life between 2010 and August 2014. The most common diagnosis was complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1) (37.9%). Pain had major consequences, with total disability in 69% of cases and 100% of children taking pain medications. In 65.5% of cases, patients were hospitalized in an inpatient setting, and 34.5% attended an outpatient program. Treatment lasted from 1 to 68 weeks (mean, 24.3; standard deviation [SD], 21.6). Patients received a combination of medical care, physical therapy (100%), occupational therapy (37.9%), psychological counseling (100%), pain medications (96.6%), and schooling (96.6%). Pain improved significantly in 89.7% of patients (95% confidence interval [95% CI] [0.73-0.98]) and pain medication consumption decreased significantly in 72.4% of children (95% CI [0.53-0.87]). Patients who had stopped walking could ambulate again in 91.7% of cases (95% CI [0.73-0.99]) and 86.4% of patients who had been missing school were back at school full time (95% CI [0.65-0.97]). There were no significant differences for these results between inpatient and outpatient management programs. Improvements were maintained at 3-6 months after discharge in 83.3% of cases.

CONCLUSION

The multidisciplinary pain management program in this French pediatric functional rehabilitation center shows results comparable to the programs described in other countries. Chronic pain should be evaluated with standardized and validated tools, such as the measurement of the pain-related disability with the Functional Disability Index.