Triazolam kinetics: interaction with cimetidine, propranolol, and the combination

Cytochrome P450 3A Time-Dependent Inhibition Assays Are Too Sensitive for Identification of Drugs Causing Clinically Significant Drug-Drug Interactions: A Comparison of Human Liver Microsomes and Hepatocytes and Definition of Boundaries for Inactivation Rate Constants

Time-dependent inhibition (TDI) of CYP3A is an important mechanism underlying numerous drug-drug interactions (DDIs), and assays to measure this are done to support early drug research efforts. However, measuring TDI of CYP3A in human liver microsomes (HLMs) frequently yields overestimations of clinical DDIs and thus can lead to the erroneous elimination of many viable drug candidates from further development. In this investigation, 50 drugs were evaluated for TDI in HLMs and suspended human hepatocytes (HHEPs) to define appropriate boundary lines for the TDI parameter rate constant for inhibition (k_obs) at a concentration of 30 µM. In HLMs, a k_obs value of 0.002 minute^-1 was statistically distinguishable from control; however, many drugs show k_obs greater than this but do not cause DDI. A boundary line defined by the drug with the lowest k_obs that causes a DDI (diltiazem) was established at 0.01 minute^-1 Even with this boundary, of the 33 drugs above this value, only 61% cause a DDI (true positive rate). A corresponding analysis was done using HHEPs; k_obs of 0.0015 minute^-1 was statistically distinguishable from control, and the boundary was established at 0.006 minute^-1 Values of k_obs in HHEPs were almost always lower than those in HLMs. These findings offer a practical guide to the use of TDI data for CYP3A in early drug-discovery research. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Time-dependent inhibition of CYP3A is responsible for many drug interactions. In vitro assays are employed in early drug research to identify and remove CYP3A time-dependent inhibitors from further consideration. This analysis demonstrates suitable boundaries for inactivation rates to better delineate drug candidates for their potential to cause clinically significant drug interactions.

Expanded studies of the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam in healthy volunteers

Previous work described the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of multidose sublingual triazolam (Halcion; Pharmacia & Upjohn Co, Kalamazoo, Mich). This laboratory study evaluated the hypothesis that incremental dosing of triazolam produces dose-dependent central nervous system depression that is profound and long lasting. Forty-nine healthy adults between the ages of 21 and 39 years, not receiving dental treatment, were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 12) or 1 of 3 triazolam groups (0.25-mg single dose, n = 12; 0.5 mg divided between 2 equal doses for 60 minutes, n = 12; or 0.75 mg divided among 3 doses for 90 minutes, n = 13). Plasma triazolam concentrations were determined. Bispectral index (BIS) and the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale were used to assess sedation. Plasma triazolam concentrations increased with time in all subjects, with Tmax and Cmax both increasing dose dependently. Compared with placebo, all dosing paradigms produced dose-dependent BIS suppression and sedation. The single dose of 0.25 mg reached its peak BIS suppression at 90 (81 +/- 7) minutes and sedation at 120 (3.6 +/- 0.5) minutes and returned to baseline before 360 minutes. In contrast, incremental dosing of 0.5 and 0.75 mg produced profound and long-lasting BIS suppression and sedation that did not plateau until either 180 or 210 minutes as measured by the BIS index (67 +/- 14 and 60 +/- 16 at 0.5 and 0.75 mg, respectively) and 150 minutes as measured by the Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale (3.2 +/- 1.0 and 2.7 +/- 0.4 at 0.5 and 0.75 mg, respectively). These data more fully characterize the effects of incremental dosing with sublingual triazolam and provide additional insight for discharge safety recommendations.

General Framework for the Quantitative Prediction of CYP3A4-Mediated Oral Drug Interactions Based on the AUC Increase by Coadministration of??Standard Drugs

BACKGROUND

Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 is the most prevalent metabolising enzyme in the human liver and is also a target for various drug interactions of significant clinical concern. Even though there are numerous reports regarding drug interactions involving CYP3A4, it is far from easy to estimate all potential interactions, since too many drugs are metabolised by CYP3A4. For this reason, a comprehensive framework for the prediction of CYP3A4-mediated drug interactions would be of considerable clinical importance.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to provide a robust and practical method for the prediction of drug interactions mediated by CYP3A4 using minimal in vivo information from drug-interaction studies, which are often carried out early in the course of drug development.

DATA SOURCES

The analysis was based on 113 drug-interaction studies reported in 78 published articles over the period 1983-2006. The articles were used if they contained sufficient information about drug interactions. Information on drug names, doses and the magnitude of the increase in the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) were collected.

METHODS

The ratio of the contribution of CYP3A4 to oral clearance (CR(CYP)(3A4)) was calculated for 14 substrates (midazolam, alprazolam, buspirone, cerivastatin, atorvastatin, ciclosporin, felodipine, lovastatin, nifedipine, nisoldipine, simvastatin, triazolam, zolpidem and telithromycin) based on AUC increases observed in interaction studies with itraconazole or ketoconazole. Similarly, the time-averaged apparent inhibition ratio of CYP3A4 (IR(CYP)(3A4)) was calculated for 18 inhibitors (ketoconazole, voriconazole, itraconazole, telithromycin, clarithromycin, saquinavir, nefazodone, erythromycin, diltiazem, fluconazole, verapamil, cimetidine, ranitidine, roxithromycin, fluvoxamine, azithromycin, gatifloxacin and fluoxetine) primarily based on AUC increases observed in drug-interaction studies with midazolam. The increases in the AUC of a substrate associated with coadministration of an inhibitor were estimated using the equation 1/(1 - CR(CYP)(3A4) x IR(CYP)(3A4)), based on pharmacokinetic considerations.

RESULTS

The proposed method enabled predictions of the AUC increase by interactions with any combination of these substrates and inhibitors (total 251 matches). In order to validate the reliability of the method, the AUC increases in 60 additional studies were analysed. The method successfully predicted AUC increases within 67-150% of the observed increase for 50 studies (83%) and within 50-200% for 57 studies (95%). Midazolam is the most reliable standard substrate for evaluation of the in vivo inhibition of CYP3A4. The present analysis suggests that simvastatin, lovastatin and buspirone can be used as alternatives. To evaluate the in vivo contribution of CYP3A4, ketoconazole or itraconazole is the selective inhibitor of choice.

CONCLUSION

This method is applicable to (i) prioritize clinical trials for investigating drug interactions during the course of drug development and (ii) predict the clinical significance of unknown drug interactions. If a drug-interaction study is carefully designed using appropriate standard drugs, significant interactions involving CYP3A4 will not be missed. In addition, the extent of CYP3A4-mediated interactions between many other drugs can be predicted using the current method.

Insomnia in General Practice

Insomnia is an extremely common condition with major social and economic consequences worldwide. Two large epidemiological studies (Morfeo 1 and Morfeo 2) recently performed in Italy provided much-needed novel data on the impact of insomnia in patients whose primary healthcare is provided by general practitioners (GPs). These studies found that insomnia is managed relatively well by GPs in Italy, although diagnosis and treatment can be compromised because of the lack of standardised criteria. Although a number of consensus reports on insomnia have been published, these are mainly highly specific documents that are difficult to implement in general practice. To address this, a consensus group involving 695 GPs and over 60 specialists from the Italian Association of Sleep Medicine was established. The major objectives of the consensus study were to establish basic knowledge for the diagnosis and treatment of insomnia, and to produce guidelines for the management of insomnia by GPs. This is the first time that GPs have been directly involved in producing insomnia guidelines of this type, and this approach reflects their pivotal role in the diagnosis and management of this condition. Participants were carefully selected to ensure adequate representation of sleep specialists and GPs, with the group being headed by a steering committee and an advisory board. Guideline statements were selected following careful literature review and were voted on using formalised consensus procedures. This review describes current views on the diagnosis and management of insomnia from the perspective of the GP. In addition, the results of the consensus study are presented. They include recognition of the following principles: (i) insomnia is a genuine pathology that must be appropriately diagnosed and treated; (ii) when concomitant pathologies are present, additional significance should be given to treatment of insomnia since it can influence prognosis of coexistent disorders; (iii) appropriate treatment should consider the cause of insomnia as well as the characteristics of available pharmacological agents; (iv) with regard to hypnotic drugs, preference should be given to medications with a short half-life in order to limit residual effects; (v) non-benzodiazepine hypnotics are preferred to classic benzodiazepines as they have higher selectivity and present a lower risk of undesirable effects; (vi) tablets are preferable to liquid preparations as they are less likely to lead to dependence and to overdosing by the patient; and (vi) once treatment has been initiated, insomnia patients should be carefully followed up. These statements provide much needed criteria for better management of insomnia by GPs in Italy.

Clinically important drug interactions with zopiclone, zolpidem and zaleplon

Insomnia, an inability to initiate or maintain sleep, affects approximately one-third of the American population. Conventional benzodiazepines, such as triazolam and midazolam, were the treatment of choice for short-term insomnia for many years but are associated with adverse effects such as rebound insomnia, withdrawal and dependency. The newer hypnosedatives include zolpidem, zaleplon and zopiclone. These agents may be preferred over conventional benzodiazepines to treat short-term insomnia because they may be less likely to cause significant rebound insomnia or tolerance and are as efficacious as the conventional benzodiazepines. This review aims to summarise the published clinical drug interaction studies involving zolpidem, zaleplon and zopiclone. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions that may be clinically important are highlighted. Clinical trials have studied potential interactions of zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone with the following types of drugs: cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers (rifampicin), CYP inhibitors (azoles, ritonavir and erythromycin), histamine H(2) receptor antagonists (cimetidine and ranitidine), antidepressants, antipsychotics, antagonists of benzodiazepines and drugs causing sedation. Rifampicin significantly induced the metabolism of the newer hypnosedatives and decreased their sedative effects, indicating that a dose increase of these agents may be necessary when they are administered with rifampicin. Ketoconazole, erythromycin and cimetidine inhibited the metabolism of the newer hypnosedatives and enhanced their sedative effects, suggesting that a dose reduction may be required. Addition of ethanol to treatment with the newer hypnosedatives resulted in additive sedative effects without altering the pharmacokinetic parameters of the drugs. Compared with some of the conventional benzodiazepines, fewer clinically important interactions appear to have been reported in the literature with zaleplon, zolpidem and zopiclone. The fact that these drugs are newer to the market and have not been as extensively studied as the conventional benzodiazepines may be the reason for this. Another explanation may be a difference in CYP metabolism. While triazolam and midazolam are biotransformed almost entirely via CYP3A4, the newer hypnosedatives are biotransformed by several CYP isozymes in addition to CYP3A4, resulting in CYP3A4 inhibitors and inducers having a lesser effect on their biotransformation.

Inhibition of tacrine oral clearance by cimetidine

Plasma tacrine, 1-hydroxytacrine, 2-hydroxytacrine, and 4-hydroxytacrine concentrations were measured in 12 healthy elderly subjects in this nonblinded two-period study to assess the effect of multiple doses of cimetidine on single-dose tacrine pharmacokinetics. Subjects received 40 mg tacrine (Cognex) alone and during multiple-dose cimetidine (300 mg four times a day) administration. Overall, tacrine and cimetidine were well tolerated by healthy elderly subjects. After coadministration of cimetidine with tacrine, plasma tacrine concentrations were approximately one-third higher than values after administration of tacrine alone; metabolite concentrations were also higher. Mean tacrine oral clearance was reduced by 30%; however, mean absorption rate and elimination half-life values were not affected by cimetidine. It was concluded that cimetidine inhibits first-pass hepatic extraction of tacrine by cytochrome P450 enzymes but has little effect on systemic drug clearance. Clinical considerations may dictate a reduction in tacrine dosage when tacrine is coadministered with cimetidine.

Triazolam pharmacokinetics after intravenous, oral, and sublingual administration

This study was designed to evaluate the relative and absolute bioavailability of triazolam, 0.25 mg, after the administration of the marketed oral tablet and a sublingual prototype wafer; an intravenous dose was used as a reference. Twelve men were evaluated in a three-way crossover study; study days were separated by 1 week. A single dose was administered to each subject at approximately 8 a.m.; serial blood samples were obtained for the determination of triazolam concentration. The fraction absorbed relative to intravenous was 20% higher in the sublingual than in the oral treatment (p = 0.0128); the difference between treatments was greatest in the first 2 hours as indicated by the area under the curve from 0 to 2 hours (p < 0.05). The extraction ratio ranged from 0.05 to 0.25, and the predicted availability after oral administration was 86% with a range of 75 to 95%. In contrast, the observed mean absolute availability was 44% (oral) and 53% (sublingual). A potential explanation for this discrepancy between predicted and observed bioavailability is that after oral administration, a fraction of triazolam may be metabolized by cytochrome P450IIIA4 in the gut wall, with a separate fraction subject to first-pass metabolism in the liver. Although this study was not designed to identify sites of triazolam metabolism, the proposed explanation is consistent with the occurrence of P450IIIA4 in the stomach, small intestine, and liver. Doses administered sublingually avoid first-pass metabolism, producing earlier and higher peak concentrations than do doses administered orally.

Presystemic extraction: mechanisms and consequences

Many drugs have incomplete systemic availability after oral dosage. This can be attributed to incomplete absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, or to presystemic extraction, in which a fraction of an orally administered dose is biotransformed before reaching the systemic circulation. Presystemic extraction can occur either via biotransformation by gastrointestinal mucosa or enteric flora, or via metabolism during the "first-pass" through the liver. For drugs with low oral bioavailability due to high presystemic extraction, impaired clearance leads to increased peak plasma levels and greater area under the concentration-time curve, but minimal change in elimination half-life.

Clinical relevance of cimetidine drug interactions

The excellent efficacy and tolerability profiles of H2-antagonists have established these agents as the leading class of antiulcer drugs. Attention has been focused on drug interactions with H2-antagonists as a means of product differentiation and because many patients are receiving multiple drug therapy. The main mechanism of most drug interactions involving cimetidine appears to be inhibition of the hepatic microsomal enzyme cytochrome P450, an effect which may be related to the different structures of H2-antagonists. Ranitidine appears to have less affinity than cimetidine for this system. There have been many published case reports and studies of drug interactions with cimetidine, but many of these have provided pharmacokinetic data only, with little information concerning the clinical significance of these findings. Nevertheless, the coadministration of cimetidine with drugs that have a narrow therapeutic margin (such as theophylline) may potentially result in clinically significant adverse effects. The monitoring of serum concentrations of drugs coadministered with cimetidine may reduce the risk of adverse events but does not abolish the problem. However, for most patients, concomitant administration of cimetidine with drugs possessing a wide therapeutic margin is unlikely to pose a significant problem.

Sensitivity to triazolam in the elderly

BACKGROUND

Elderly persons frequently appear to be sensitive to the effects of many drugs that depress the central nervous system. We studied the effect of age on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the benzodiazepine hypnotic agent triazolam, now the most frequently prescribed hypnotic drug in the United States.

METHODS

Twenty-six healthy young subjects (mean age, 30 years) and 21 healthy elderly subjects (mean age, 69 years) participated in a four-way crossover study. After a single-blind adaptation trial with placebo, each subject received, in random order and in double-blind fashion, single doses of placebo, 0.125 mg of triazolam, and 0.25 mg of triazolam. For 24 hours after the administration of each of the three study medications, plasma triazolam levels were determined and psychomotor performance, memory, and degree of sedation were assessed.

RESULTS

Plasma triazolam concentrations increased in proportion to the dose, but the elderly subjects had higher plasma concentrations due to reduced clearance of the drug. The degree of sedation as rated by an observer and the reduction in the subjects' performance on the digit-symbol substitution test were both greater in the elderly than in the young subjects after they were given the same doses. The relation of the plasma triazolam concentration to the degree of impairment was similar for the two groups. As part of the study, information was presented 1 1/2 hours after the administration of the drugs; the subjects' ability to recall the information 24 hours later was impaired by both doses of triazolam, and the percent decrease was similar in the young and elderly groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Triazolam caused a greater degree of sedation and greater impairment of psychomotor performance in healthy elderly persons than in young persons who received the same dose. These effects resulted from reduced clearance and higher plasma concentrations of triazolam rather than from an increased intrinsic sensitivity to the drug. On the basis of these results, the dosage of triazolam for elderly persons should be reduced on average by 50 percent.