Human pharmacokinetic study of immediate-release (codeine phosphate) and sustained-release (codeine Contin) codeine

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling to predict the pharmacokinetics of codeine in different CYP2D6 phenotypes

Objectives

Codeine, a prodrug used as an opioid agonist, is metabolized to the active product morphine by CYP2D6. This study aimed to establish physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of codeine and morphine and explore the influence of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on the pharmacokinetics of codeine and morphine.

Methods

An initial PBPK modeling of codeine in healthy adults was established using PK-Sim® software and subsequently extrapolated to CYP2D6 phenotype-related PBPK modeling based on the turnover frequency (Kcat) of CYP2D6 for different phenotype populations (UM, EM, IM, and PM). The mean fold error (MFE) and geometric mean fold error (GMFE) methods were used to compare the differences between the predicted and observed values of the pharmacokinetic parameters to evaluate the accuracy of PBPK modeling. The validated models were then used to support dose safety for different CYP2D6 phenotypes.

Results

The developed and validated CYP2D6 phenotype-related PBPK model successfully predicted codeine and morphine dispositions in different CYP2D6 phenotypes. Compared with EMs, the predicted AUC0-∞ value of morphine was 98.6% lower in PMs, 60.84% lower in IMs, and 73.43% higher in UMs. Morphine plasma exposure in IMs administered 80 mg of codeine was roughly comparable to that in EMs administered 30 mg of codeine. CYP2D6 UMs may start dose titration to achieve an optimal individual regimen and avoid a single dose of over 20 mg. Codeine should not be used in PMs for pain relief, considering its insufficient efficacy.

Conclusion

PBPK modeling can be applied to explore the dosing safety of codeine and can be helpful in predicting the effect of CYP2D6 genetic polymorphisms on drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with codeine in the future.

“Doctor shopping and pharmacy hopping”: practice innovations relating to codeine

Purpose

– The misuse of pharmaceutical opioid analgesics is identified as a global public health concern. Codeine represents an interesting quandary in terms of its regulated status, with individuals varying in their metabolism of codeine, estimation of safe dosages, risk of adverse health consequences and abuse potential. Efforts to quantify and address hidden non-compliant medical codeine use, overuse and intentional misuse is compromised by availability to the public in prescribed and over the counter forms. The paper aims to discuss these issues.

Design/methodology/approach

– A review of literature on codeine use, misuse and dependence, and associated innovative medical and pharmacy interventions is presented, and was conducted as part of a larger scoping review on codeine.

Findings

– The review highlights the complexities associated with monitoring public health awareness of codeine's abuse potential, and customer/patients trends in non-compliant codeine use for therapeutic and recreational purposes. Aberrant codeine behaviours centre on visiting multiple doctors for prescriptions, repeated lost or stolen prescriptions, forging prescriptions and use of multiple pharmacies. Innovations to monitor misuse of codeine include national prescription databases and recent developments in real-time monitoring of dispensing activity.

Practical implications

– Further development of real-time monitoring processes with process evaluation is advised.

Originality/value

– This viewpoint is intended to demonstrate how efforts to quantify and address codeine use are compromised by its availability. It intends to encourage further policy and practitioner dialogue on how to monitor, support and intervene with consumers misusing codeine.

Pediatric palliative care: use of opioids for the management of pain

Pediatric palliative care (PPC) is provided to children experiencing life-limiting diseases (LLD) or life-threatening diseases (LTD). Sixty to 90% of children with LLD/LTD undergoing PPC receive opioids at the end of life. Analgesia is often insufficient. Reasons include a lack of knowledge concerning opioid prescribing and adjustment of opioid dose to changing requirements. The choice of first-line opioid is based on scientific evidence, pain pathophysiology, and available administration modes. Doses are calculated on a bodyweight basis up to a maximum absolute starting dose. Morphine remains the gold standard starting opioid in PPC. Long-term opioid choice and dose administration is determined by the pathology, analgesic effectiveness, and adverse effect profile. Slow-release oral morphine remains the dominant formulation for long-term use in PPC with hydromorphone slow-release preparations being the first rotation opioid when morphine shows severe adverse effects. The recently introduced fentanyl transdermal therapeutic system with a drug-release rate of 12.5 microg/hour matches the lower dose requirements of pediatric cancer pain control. Its use may be associated with less constipation compared with morphine use. Though oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate has reduced bioavailability (25%), it inherits potential for breakthrough pain management. However, the gold standard breakthrough opioid remains immediate-release morphine. Buprenorphine is of special clinical interest as a result of its different administration routes, long duration of action, and metabolism largely independent of renal function. Antihyperalgesic effects, induced through antagonism at the kappa-receptor, may contribute to its effectiveness in neuropathic pain. Methadone also has a long elimination half-life (19 [SD 14] hours) and NMDA receptor activity although dose administration is complicated by highly variable morphine equianalgesic equivalence (1 : 2.5-20). Opioid rotation to methadone requires special protocols that take this into account. Strategies to minimize adverse effects of long-term opioid treatment include dose reduction, symptomatic therapy, opioid rotation, and administration route change. Patient- or nurse-controlled analgesia devices are useful when pain is rapidly changing, or in terminal care where analgesic requirements may escalate. In this article, we present detailed pediatric pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data for opioids, their indications and contraindications, as well as dose-administration regimens that include practical strategies for opioid switching and dose reduction. Additionally, we discuss the problem of hyperalgesia and the use of adjuvant drugs to support opioid therapy.

Aging, opioid-receptor agonists and antagonists, and the vestibulosympathetic reflex in humans

Animal studies indicate that opioids inhibit the firing rate of vestibular neurons, which are important in mediating the vestibulosympathetic reflex. Furthermore, this inhibition appears to be greater in more mature rats. In the present study, we tested the hypotheses that opioids inhibit the vestibulosympathetic reflex in humans and that endogenous opioids contribute to the age-related impairment of the vestibulosympathetic reflex. These hypotheses were tested by measuring muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), arterial blood pressure, and heart rate responses to otolith organ engagement during head-down rotation (HDR) in young (24 ± 2 yr old) and older (63 ± 2 yr) subjects before and after administration of either an opioid-receptor antagonist (16 mg naloxone in 9 young and 8 older subjects) or an opioid-receptor agonist (60 mg codeine in 7 young and 7 older subjects). Naloxone did not augment the reflex increase in MSNA during HDR in young (Δ7 ± 2 vs. Δ4 ± 2 bursts/min and Δ81 ± 23 vs. Δ60 ± 24% change in burst frequency and total MSNA before and after naloxone, respectively) or older subjects (Δ2 ± 2 vs. Δ1 ± 2 burst/min and Δ8 ± 7 vs. Δ8 ± 9% before and after naloxone). Similarly, codeine did not attenuate the increase in MSNA during HDR in young (Δ8 ± 1 vs. Δ7 ± 2 bursts/min and Δ53 ± 4 vs. Δ64 ± 16% before and after codeine) or older subjects (Δ6 ± 4 vs. Δ3 ± 3 bursts/min and Δ38 ± 21 vs. Δ33 ± 20%). Mean arterial blood pressure and heart rate responses to HDR were not altered by either naloxone or codeine. These data do not provide experimental support for the concept that opioids modulate the vestibulosympathetic reflex in humans. Moreover, endogenous opioids do not appear to contribute the age-associated impairment of the vestibulosympathetic reflex.

Controlled-release codeine is equivalent to acetaminophen plus codeine for post-cholecystectomy analgesia

PURPOSE

Following ambulatory surgery, long-acting analgesics may provide advantages over short-acting analgesics. This study compared controlled-release codeine (CC) and acetaminophen plus codeine (A/C; 300 mg/30 mg) for pain control in the 48-hr period following laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized to CC or A/C in a double-blind, double-dummy parallel group study. Unrelieved pain in hospital was treated with fentanyl i.v. bolus. Pain [100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] was assessed before the first dose of medication; at 0.5, one, two, three, and four hours post-dose; at discharge; and three times a day for 48 hr. Adverse events were recorded and measures of patient satisfaction were assessed at the end of the study.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients were enrolled in the study; 42 patients in each group. There were no statistically significant differences between CC and A/C treatment. Mean VAS baseline pain was similar in both groups (P = 0.49) and there was no significant difference in the time to onset of analgesia (P = 0.17). At 0.5 hr, the mean VAS pain score was significantly reduced from baseline in both groups (P = 0.0001). The VAS pain scores at discharge were reduced 59% and 56% from baseline, respectively (P = 0.61). There was no difference between treatments in the incidence of adverse events and patients reported similar levels of satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Controlled-release codeine provides an equivalent onset of analgesia, reduction in postoperative pain, and level of patient satisfaction, to acetaminophen plus codeine, over 48 hr following cholecystectomy, with the advantage of less frequent dosing.

Influence of opioid agonists on cardiac human ether-a-go-go-related gene K(+) currents

We have evaluated the ability of various opioid agonists, including methadone, L-alpha-acetylmethadol (LAAM), fentanyl, meperidine, codeine, morphine, and buprenorphine, to block the cardiac human ether-a-go-go-related gene (HERG) K(+) current (I(HERG)) in human cells stably transfected with the HERG potassium channel gene. Our results show that LAAM, methadone, fentanyl, and buprenorphine were effective inhibitors of I(HERG), with IC(50) values in the 1 to 10 microM range. The other drugs tested were far less potent with respect to I(HERG) inhibition. Compared with the reported maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) after administration of therapeutic doses of these drugs, the ratio of IC(50)/C(max) was highest for codeine and morphine (>455 and >400, respectively), thereby indicating that these drugs have the widest margin of safety (of the compounds tested) with respect to blockade of I(HERG). In contrast, the lowest ratios of IC(50)/C(max) were observed for LAAM and methadone (2.2 and 2.7, respectively). Further investigation showed that methadone block of I(HERG) was rapid, with steady-state inhibition achieved within 1 s when applied at its IC(50) concentration (10 microM) for I(HERG) block. Results from "envelope of tails" tests suggest that the majority of block occurred when the channels were in the open and/or inactivated states, although approximately 10% of the available HERG K(+) channels were apparently blocked in a closed state. Similar results were obtained for LAAM. These results demonstrate that LAAM and methadone can block I(HERG) in transfected cells at clinically relevant concentrations, thereby providing a plausible mechanism for the adverse cardiac effects observed in some patients receiving LAAM or methadone.

Muscle pain perception and sympathetic nerve activity to exercise during opioid modulation

The purpose of this experiment was to examine the effects of the endogenous opioid system on forearm muscle pain and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during dynamic fatiguing exercise. Twelve college-age men (24 +/- 4 yr) performed graded (1-min stages; 30 contractions/min) handgrip to fatigue 1 h after the ingestion of either 60 mg codeine, 50 mg naltrexone, or placebo. Pain (0-10 scale) and exertion (0-10 and 6-20 scales) intensities were measured during the last 15 s of each minute of exercise and every 15 s during recovery. MSNA was measured continuously from the peroneal nerve in the left leg. Pain threshold occurred earlier [1.8 +/- 1, 2. 2 +/- 1, 2.2 +/- 1 J: codeine, naltrexone, and placebo, respectively] and was associated with a lower rating of perceived exertion (RPE) (2.7 +/- 2, 3.6 +/- 2, 3.8 +/- 2: codeine, naltrexone, and placebo, respectively) in the codeine condition compared with either the naltrexone or placebo conditions. There were no main effects (i.e., drugs) or interaction (i.e., drugs x time) for either forearm muscle pain or RPE during exercise [pain: F (2, 22) = 0.69, P = 0.51]. There was no effect of drug on MSNA, heart rate, or blood pressure during baseline, exercise, or recovery. Peak exercise MSNA responses were 21 +/- 1, 21 +/- 2.0, and 21 +/- 2.0 bursts/30 s for codeine, naltrexone, and placebo conditions, respectively. Peak mean arterial pressure responses were 135 +/- 4, 131 +/- 3, and 132 +/- 4 mmHg for codeine, naltrexone, and placebo conditions, respectively. It is concluded that neither 60 mg codeine nor 50 mg naltrexone has an effect on forearm muscle pain, exertion, or MSNA during high- intensity handgrip to fatigue.

Pharmacokinetics of opioids in liver disease

The liver is the major site of biotransformation for most opioids. Thus, the disposition of these drugs may be affected in patients with liver insufficiency. The major metabolic pathway for most opioids is oxidation. The exceptions are morphine and buprenorphine, which primarily undergo glucuronidation, and remifentanil, which is cleared by ester hydrolysis. Oxidation of opioids is reduced in patients with hepatic cirrhosis, resulting in decreased drug clearance [for pethidine (meperidine), dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine, tramadol and alfentanil] and/or increased oral bioavailability caused by a reduced first-pass metabolism (for pethidine, dextropropoxyphene, pentazocine and dihydrocodeine). Although glucuronidation is thought to be less affected in liver cirrhosis, and clearance of morphine was found to be decreased and oral bioavailability increased. The consequence of reduced drug metabolism is the risk of accumulation in the body, especially with repeated administration. Lower doses or longer administration intervals should be used to remedy this risk. Special risks are known for pethidine, with the potential for the accumulation of norpethidine, a metabolite that can cause seizures, and for dextropropoxyphene, for which several cases of hepatotoxicity have been reported. On the other hand, the analgesic activity of codeine and tilidine depends on transformation into the active metabolites, morphine and nortilidine, respectively. If metabolism is decreased in patients with chronic liver disease, the analgesic action of these drugs may be compromised. Finally, the disposition of a few opioids, such as fentanyl, sufentanil and remifentanil, appears to be unaffected in liver disease.

Pharmacokinetics of epidural butorphanol in isoflurane-anaesthetized dogs

Sixteen healthy male dogs were used at random in this protocol. The dogs were anaesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Eight of the dogs received 0.25 mg/kg of butorphanol (group B) and the others an equal volume of isotonic saline (group S) administered by a catheter inserted in the lumbosacral epidural space. Butorphanol concentrations in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection. Maximum concentration of butorphanol and time to obtain this concentration were 42.28 ng/mL at 13.88 min in blood, and 18.03 ng/mL at 30 min in CSF. Volume of distribution, clearance, mean distribution and elimination half-lives were respectively 4.39 L/kg, 2.02 L/h.kg, 16.5 min and 189.1 min. Mean isoflurane minimal alveolar concentration values for group B obtained following hind- or forelimb stimulation decreased by 31% after epidural butorphanol. Cutaneous analgesia (to pin-prick test) persisted for 3 h after the end of isoflurane anaesthesia in group B and was in correlation with the plasmatic analgesic dose of butorphanol (9 ng/mL). These results suggested that analgesia was predominantly obtained by action of butorphanol on the supraspinal structures following its vascular systemic absorption.

Efficacy of controlled-release codeine in chronic non-malignant pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial

Treatment decisions for the use of opioid analgesics in chronic non-malignant pain are based primarily on survey data, as evidence from well-controlled clinical trials has been lacking. Forty-six patients with chronic non-malignant pain were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of controlled-release (CR) codeine. Following a 3-7-day diary familiarization period, patients were randomly assigned to 7 days of treatment each with CR codeine q12h or placebo. The CR codeine dose was determined from the consumption of acetaminophen+codeine in the 7 days preceding the study. During both phases, breakthrough pain was treated with acetaminophen+codeine every 4 h as required. Pain intensity was assessed at 08:00 h and 20:00 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 5-point categorical scale, and rescue analgesic consumption was recorded at the time of use. Thirty patients (17 female, 13 male; mean age: 55.1 +/- 13.4 years) completed the study and were treated with a mean daily CR codeine dose of 273 +/- 78 mg (range: 200-400 mg). CR codeine treatment resulted in significantly lower overall VAS pain intensity scores (35 +/- 18 vs. 49 +/- 16, P = 0.0001), categorical pain intensity scores (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6, P = 0.0001), and in pain scores by day of treatment and by time of day. Daily rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lower on CR codeine, relative to placebo treatment (3.6 +/- 3.5 vs. 6.1 +/- 3.2 tablets/day, P = 0.0001). There was also a significant reduction in the Pain Disability Index (PDI) on CR codeine, compared to placebo (25.0 +/- 7.7 vs. 35.1 +/- 8.2, P = 0.0001). Patients' and investigators' blinded treatment preference was significantly in favor of CR codeine, relative to placebo (73% vs. 10%, P = 0.0160 and 80% vs. 7%, P = 0.0014, respectively). The incidence of nausea was significantly higher on CR codeine than on placebo (32.6% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.013). Ninety-three percent of patients completing the study requested long-term, open-label treatment with CR codeine. Pain intensity scores at the completion of 19 weeks of long-term evaluation were comparable to those during the double-blind CR codeine treatment. We conclude that treatment with CR codeine results in reduced pain and pain-related disability in patients with chronic non-malignant pain.