Safety, tolerance, and preliminary pharmacokinetics of nefazodone after administration of single and multiple oral doses to healthy adult male volunteers: a double-blind, phase I study

Understanding Mechanisms of Food Effect and Developing Reliable PBPK Models Using a Middle-out Approach

Over the last 10 years, 40% of approved oral drugs exhibited a significant effect of food on their pharmacokinetics (PK) and currently the only method to characterize the effect of food on drug absorption, which is recognized by the authorities, is to conduct a clinical evaluation. Within the pharmaceutical industry, there is a significant effort to predict the mechanism and clinical relevance of a food effect. Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models combining both drug-specific and physiology-specific data have been used to predict the effect of food on absorption and to reveal the underlying mechanisms. This manuscript provides detailed descriptions of how a middle-out modeling approach, combining bottom-up in vitro-based predictions with limited top-down fitting of key model parameters for clinical data, can be successfully used to predict the magnitude and direction of food effect when it is predicted poorly by a bottom-up approach. For nefazodone, a mechanistic clearance for the gut and liver was added, for furosemide, an absorption window was introduced, and for aprepitant, the biorelevant solubility was refined using multiple solubility measurements. In all cases, these adjustments were supported by literature data and showcased a rational approach to assess the factors limiting absorption and exposure.

High content analysis assay for prediction of human hepatotoxicity in HepaRG and HepG2 cells

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) results in the termination of drug development or withdrawal of a drug from the market. The establishment of a predictive, high-throughput preclinical test system to evaluate potential clinical DILI is therefore required. Here, we established a high content analysis (HCA) assay in human hepatocyte cell lines such as the HepaRG with normal expression levels of CYP enzymes and HepG2 with extremely low expression levels of CYP enzymes. Clinical DILI or non-DILI compounds were evaluated for reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, glutathione (GSH) consumption, and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) attenuation. A proportion of DILI compounds induced ROS generation, GSH depletion, and MMP dysfunction, which was consistent with reported mechanisms of DILI of these compounds. In particular, DILI compounds that deplete GSH via reactive metabolites exhibited a more marked decrease in intracellular GSH or increase in ROS production in HepaRG cells than in HepG2 cells. Comparison of the two cell lines with different levels of CYP expression might help clarify the contribution of metabolism to hepatocyte toxicity. These results suggest that the HCA assay in HepaRG and HepG2 cells might help improve the accuracy of evaluating clinical DILI potential during drug screening.

How First-Time-in-Human Studies Are Being Performed: A Survey of Phase I Dose-Escalation Trials in Healthy Volunteers Published Between 1995 and 2004

First-time-in-human studies are small, time-lagged dose-escalation studies including volunteer subjects evaluating safety and tolerability. There is little consensus in the design of a first-time-in-human study, and it is difficult to get an overview of studies performed. One hundred five studies comprising 3323 healthy volunteers published in the 5 major clinical pharmacology journals since 1995 were analyzed. The average trial was placebo controlled, double blind including 32 subjects at 5 dose levels but with great variation in cohort size and dose-escalation method. The parallel single-dose design was the most common design, with the crossover designs being more frequent in the early publications. Despite discussions on the optimization of phase I trials, little seems to be happening. The development of study designs and evaluation methods for cancer trials is extensive, but formal statistically based methods and more scientific study designs are unusual in phase I dose-escalation trials in healthy volunteers.

In vitro assessment of mitochondrial dysfunction and cytotoxicity of nefazodone, trazodone, and buspirone

Mitochondrial toxicity is increasingly implicated in a host of drug-induced organ toxicities, including hepatotoxicity. Nefazodone was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2004 due to hepatotoxicity. Accordingly, we evaluated nefazodone, another triazolopyridine trazodone, plus the azaspirodecanedione buspirone, for cytotoxicity and effects on mitochondrial function. In accord with its clinical disposition, nefazodone was the most toxic compound of the three, trazodone had relatively modest effects, whereas buspirone showed the least toxicity. Nefazodone profoundly inhibited mitochondrial respiration in isolated rat liver mitochondria and in intact HepG2 cells where this was accompanied by simultaneous acceleration of glycolysis. Using immunocaptured oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) complexes, we identified Complex 1, and to a lesser amount Complex IV, as the targets of nefazodone toxicity. No inhibition was found for trazodone, and buspirone showed 3.4-fold less inhibition of OXPHOS Complex 1 than nefazodone. In human hepatocytes that express cytochrome P450, isoform 3A4, after 24 h exposure, nefazodone and trazodone collapsed mitochondrial membrane potential, and imposed oxidative stress, as detected via glutathione depletion, leading to cell death. Our results suggest that the mitochondrial impairment imposed by nefazodone is profound and likely contributes to its hepatotoxicity, especially in patients cotreated with other drugs with mitochondrial liabilities.

Inhibition of Hepatobiliary Transport as a Predictive Method for Clinical Hepatotoxicity of Nefazodone

Treatment with the antidepressant nefazodone has been associated with clinical idiosyncratic hepatotoxicty. Using membranes expressing human bile salt export pump (BSEP), human sandwich hepatocytes, and intact rats, we compared nefazodone and its marketed analogs, buspirone and trazodone. We found that nefazodone caused a strong inhibition of BSEP (IC(50) = 9 microM), inhibition of taurocholate efflux in human hepatocytes (IC(50) = 14 microM), and a transient increase in rat serum bile acids 1 h after oral drug administration. Buspirone or trazodone had no effect on biliary transport system. Nefazodone produced time- and concentration-dependent toxicity in human hepatocytes with IC(50) = 18 microM and 30 microM measured by inhibition of protein synthesis after 6 h and 24 h incubation, respectively. Toxicity was correlated with the amount of unmetabolized nefazodone. Partial recovery in toxicity by 24 h has been associated with metabolism of nefazodone to sulfate and glucuronide conjugates. The saturation of nefazodone metabolism resulted in sustained decrease in protein synthesis and cell death at 50 microM. The toxicity was not observed with buspirone or trazodone. Addition of 1-aminobenzotriazole (ABT), an inhibitor of CYP450, resulted in enhancement of nefazodone toxicity at 10 microM and was associated with accumulation of unmetabolized nefazodone. In human liver microsomes, ABT also prevented metabolism of nefazodone and formation of glutathione conjugates. We suggest that inhibition of bile acid transport by nefazodone is an indicator of potential hepatotoxicity. Our findings are consistent with the clinical experience and suggest that described methodology can be applied in the selection of nonhepatotoxic drug candidates.

Clinical trials of potential antidepressants: to what extent are the elderly represented: a review

BACKGROUND

There is widespread use of antidepressants in the elderly population. The principle of treatment of depression, however, is derived mostly from studies employing young adults and healthy elderly. This article reviews the literature on the extent to which the elderly are represented in clinical trials of potential antidepressants.

METHOD

Medline search of relevant articles of clinical trials of potential antidepressants.

RESULTS

The maximum age of inclusion for most clinical trials was 65 years. The highest age reported for depressed subjects was 90 years. There was no clear consensus on who were considered to be elderly; clinical trials conducted on the elderly included subjects who were 50, 55, or 60 years and over. Pharmacological studies on healthy subjects were most often done on young adults, age range 18 to 65 years. The period of study was relatively shorter for clinical trials done on elderly subjects. There was however, no difference in the exclusion or inclusion criteria between studies done in young and elderly subjects.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly subjects aged 75 years and over were clearly underrepresented in the clinical trials of potential antidepressants. For drugs that are used by the elderly, in its pivotal studies for registration, the inclusion of at least 25% of subjects aged 75 years and over is recommended.

Carbamazepine-nefazodone interaction in healthy subjects

The pharmacokinetic interaction between nefazodone and carbamazepine was investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects received nefazodone 200 mg twice daily for 5 days, and blood sample collection was performed on day 5 for 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis. A 4-day wash-out phase then followed from days 6 to 9. Carbamazepine 200 mg was administered once daily from days 10 to 12, and then 200 mg was given twice daily from days 13 to 44. A 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 38. Nefazodone 200 mg twice daily was added to the dosing regimen from days 40 to 44, and a subsequent 0- to 48-hour pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on day 44. Coadministration of nefazodone increased steady-state plasma area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of carbamazepine from 60.77 (+/-8.44) to 74.98 (+/-12.88) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.001) and decreased the active carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide metabolite AUC concentration from 7.10 (+/-1.16) to 5.71 (+/-0.52) microg x hr/mL (p < 0.005). During the combination, the steady-state AUC of nefazodone decreased from 7,326 (+/-3,768) to 542 (+/-191) ng x hr/mL, and the AUCs of its metabolites (hydroxynefazodone, meta-chlorophenylpiperazine, and triazoledione) decreased significantly as well (p < 0.001). Coadministration of nefazodone 200 mg twice daily and carbamazepine 200 mg twice daily was found to be safe and well tolerated; however, the increased plasma exposure to carbamazepine may warrant monitoring of plasma carbamazepine concentrations with the combination. However, higher doses (>400 mg/day) of carbamazepine could yield more extensive induction, affecting tolerability of the combination. No change in the initial nefazodone dose is necessary, and subsequent dose adjustments should be made on the basis of clinical effects; however, the repercussion of carbamazepine induction of nefazodone metabolism on the antidepressant efficacy has yet to be studied.

Metabolism of some "second"- and "fourth"-generation antidepressants: iprindole, viloxazine, bupropion, mianserin, maprotiline, trazodone, nefazodone, and venlafaxine

1. This review summarizes the major known aspects of the metabolism of second-generation (iprindole, viloxazine, bupropion, mianserin, maprotiline, and trazodone) and fourth-generation (nefazodone and venlafaxine) antidepressants. 2. Discussions about specific enzymes involved and about possible pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, particularly as they relate to cytochrome P450 enzymes, are provided.

Single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone in subjects classified as extensive and poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan

1. The single and multiple dose pharmacokinetics of nefazodone (NEF) and its active metabolites hydroxynefazodone (HO-NEF) and m-chlorophenyl-piperazine (mCPP) were evaluated in subjects classified as extensive metabolizers (EM) or poor metabolizers (PM) of dextromethorphan. 2. In a parallel design study, 10 subjects from each phenotype received either 50 mg or 200 mg oral doses of NEF as single doses on Day 1 and multiple (twice daily) doses on Days 12-22. 3. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected at specified time intervals after dosing on Days 1, 16, 18, 20 and 22. Plasma samples were analyzed for NEF, HO-NEF and mCPP. Urine samples were analyzed for mCPP and its metabolite p-hydroxy-mCPP (p-HO-mCPP) before and after hydrolyzing the samples with beta-glucuronidase. 4. For the 200 mg dose group, the single dose plasma results showed no significant differences in pharmacokinetic parameters for NEF and HO-NEF in EM compared with PM subjects. However, for mCPP, Cmax was 89 ng ml-1 in the PM subjects compared with 44 ng ml-1 in the EM subjects, AUC was higher in the PM than EM subjects (1642 ng ml-1 h and 412 ng ml-1 h, respectively), and mCPP elimination half-life increased from 6.1 h in the EM subjects to 16.4 h in the PM subjects. Upon multiple dosing, plasma levels for NEF and all metabolites reached steady state within 3 days of dosing in both groups of subjects. Steady state pharmacokinetic parameters for NEF and HO-NEF in EM and PM subjects were not significantly different. The steady state Cmax and AUC values for mCPP in the PM subjects were 182 ng ml-1 and 1706 ng ml-1 h, respectively, compared with 49.6 ng ml-1 and 182 ng ml-1 h in the EM subjects. 5. The cumulative urinary excretion of mCPP and p-HO-mCPP was different for EM and PM subjects. Excretion of total mCPP and total p-HO-mCPP was approximately four-fold lower and five-fold higher, respectively, in the EM subjects than PM subjects. 6. These results indicate that the conversion of mCPP to p-HO-mCPP is attributable to metabolism by cytochrome P450 2D6. The differences in mCPP pharmacokinetic parameters in PM subjects did not affect the time required for NEF and its metabolites to attain steady state or the number of adverse experiences in either group of subjects. Based on the results of this study, NEF may be dosed to EM and PM patients without regard to their cytochrome P450 2D6 phenotype.