Effects of sulfur mustard on transcription in human epidermal keratinocytes: analysis by mRNA differential display

Differential gene expression in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) liver and ovary after exposure to zearalenone

Zearalenone (ZEA) is a mycotoxin of worldwide occurrence, and it has been shown to produce numerous adverse effects in both laboratory and domestic animals. However, regardless of recent achievements, the molecular mechanisms underlying ZEA toxicity remain elusive, and little is known about transcriptome changes of fish cells in response to ZEA occurrence. In the present study, differential display PCR was used to generate a unique cDNA fingerprint of differentially expressed transcripts in the liver and ovary of juvenile rainbow trout after either 24, 72, or 168 h of intraperitoneal exposure to ZEA (10 mg/kg of body mass). From a total of 59 isolated cDNA bands (ESTs), 5 could be confirmed with Real-Time qPCR and their nucleotide sequences were identified as mRNAs of: acty (β-centractin), the cytoskeleton structural element; bccip, responsible for DNA repair and cell cycle control; enoa (α-enolase), encoding enzyme of the glycolysis process; proc (protein C), that takes part in the blood coagulation process; and frih, encoding the heavy chain of ferritin, the protein complex important for iron storage. Further qPCR analysis of the confirmed ESTs expression profiles revealed significant mRNA level alterations in both tissues of exposed fish during the 168 h study. The results revealed a complex network of genes associated with different biological processes that may be engaged in the cellular response to ZEA exposure, i.e. blood coagulation or iron-storage processes.

The transcriptional effects of the vesicants lewisite and sulfur mustard on human epidermal keratinocytes

Sulfur mustard (SM) injury is a complex process that begins with extensive alkylation of critical cellular components and culminates in cell death and skin vesication. The mechanism of toxicity is not well understood since SM broadly alkylates cellular nucleophiles. However, two events appear integral-the formation of DNA cross-links and the release of proteases into the extracellular matrix. To identify genes directly involved in vesication, the transcriptional profile of SM was compared to the vesicant lewisite (L). Similarly, to identify genes directly involved in DNA damage, the transcriptional profile of SM was compared to the genotoxic agent cisplatin (c-Pt). Microarrays containing 7,075 sequence-verified human cDNAs were screened with mRNA from human epidermal keratinocytes treated with 200 mu M agent for 2 h. A large number of differentially expressed genes were identified, with many similarities observed between agents. Many genes not previously associated with SM and L injury were also identified, including a large percentage of unknown function. A comparison of the differential expression profiles revealed that L had the broadest and most robustly altered expression. Apoptotic transcripts were clearly evident in L but not in SM, suggesting a late stage in L injury.

Sulfur mustard toxicity: history, chemistry, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics

Sulfur mustard (SM) and similar bifunctional agents have been used as chemical weapons for almost 100 years. Victims of high-dose exposure, both combatants and civilians, may die within hours or weeks, but low-dose exposure causes both acute injury to the eyes, skin, respiratory tract and other parts of the body, and chronic sequelae in these organs are often debilitating and have a serious impact on quality of life. Ever since they were first used in warfare in 1917, SM and other mustard agents have been the subjects of intensive research, and their chemistry, pharmacokinetics and mechanisms of toxic action are now fairly well understood. In the present article we review this knowledge and relate the molecular-biological basis of SM toxicity, as far as it has been elucidated, to the pathological effects on exposure victims.

Transcriptional responses associated with sulfur mustard and thermal burns in porcine skin

In military and civilian environments, serious cutaneous damage can result from thermal burns or exposure to the blistering agent sulfur mustard [bis (2-chloroethyl) sulfide; HD]. Similar therapies have historically been used to treat cutaneous thermal and HD injuries; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms of tissue damage and wound healing may differ between the types of burns. Using microarray analysis, this study assessed the transcriptional responses to cutaneous HD and thermal injury at 48 hours post-exposure to identify molecular networks and genes associated with each type of skin injury. Ventral abdominal sites on each of 4 weanling swine were exposed to 400 mul of undiluted HD or a heated brass rod (70 degrees C) for 8 minutes and 45-60 seconds, respectively. At 48 hours post-exposure, total RNA was isolated from excised skin samples and hybridized to Affymetrix GeneChip Porcine Genome Arrays (containing 20,201 genes). Both HD and thermal exposure promoted significant transcriptional changes where 290 and 267 transcripts were increased and 197 and 707 transcripts were decreased with HD and thermal exposure, respectively. HD- and thermal-injured skin expressed 149 increased and 148 decreased common transcripts. Comparison of the 10 most significantly changed biological functions for HD and thermal exposures identified 7 overlapping functional groups. Canonical pathways analysis revealed 15 separate signaling pathways containing transcripts associated with both HD and thermal exposure. Within these pathways, 5 transcripts (CXCR4, FGFR2, HMOX1, IL1R1, and TLR4) were identified as known targets for existing phase II/III clinical trial or Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. This study is the first to directly assess transcriptional changes in porcine skin subjected to HD or thermal injury over the same time period.

Effect of nitrogen mustard, a vesicant agent, on lymphocyte energy metabolism

BACKGROUND

The vesicant agents sulfur and nitrogen mustards, which contain chloroethyl groups, are potent inhibitors of DNA synthesis and cell growth, likely changing the utilization of anaerobic glycolysis for energy generation.

METHODS

To investigate the effect of nitrogen mustard on cellular energy metabolism, lymphocytes treated with increasing doses of mechlorethamine (HN2), a nitrogen mustard and an analogue of sulfur mustard, were incubated with radiolabeled glucose. The rates of aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis were then determined.

RESULTS

Glycogen consumption was significantly higher in cells treated with HN2 in a dose-dependent manner compared to untreated cells. Similarly, the amount of end-product lactate was increased, but CO2 was reduced in HN2-treated cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphocytes normally use aerobic glycolysis under aerobic conditions, but energy metabolism predominantly involved anaerobic glycolysis after severe intoxication with mustard agent.

Microarray Analysis of Mouse Ear Tissue Exposed to Bis-(2-chloroethyl) Sulfide: Gene Expression Profiles Correlate with Treatment Efficacy and An Established Clinical Endpoint

Bis-(2-chloroethyl) sulfide (sulfur mustard; SM) is a potent alkylating agent. Three treatment compounds have been shown to limit SM damage in the mouse ear vesicant model: dimercaprol, octyl homovanillamide, and indomethacin. Microarrays were used to determine gene expression profiles of biopsies taken from mouse ears after exposure to SM in the presence or absence of treatment compounds. Mouse ears were topically exposed to SM alone or were pretreated for 15 min with a treatment compound and then exposed to SM. Ear tissue was harvested 24 h after exposure for ear weight determination, the endpoint used to evaluate treatment compound efficacy. RNA extracted from the tissues was used to generate microarray probes for gene expression profiling of therapeutic responses. Principal component analysis of the gene expression data revealed partitioning of the samples based on treatment compound and SM exposure. Patterns of gene responses to the treatment compounds were indicative of exposure condition and were phenotypically anchored to ear weight. Pretreatment with indomethacin, the least effective treatment compound, produced ear weights close to those treated with SM alone. Ear weights from animals pretreated with dimercaprol or octyl homovanillamide were more closely associated with exposure to vehicle alone. Correlation coefficients between gene expression level and ear weight revealed genes involved in mediating responses to both SM exposure and treatment compounds. These data provide a basis for elucidating the mechanisms of response to SM and drug treatment and also provide a basis for developing strategies to accelerate development of effective SM medical countermeasures.