The electrochemical impedance of polarized 316L stainless steel: structure-property-adsorption correlation

Cathodic Voltage-controlled Electrical Stimulation Plus Prolonged Vancomycin Reduce Bacterial Burden of a Titanium Implant-associated Infection in a Rodent Model

BACKGROUND

Cathodic voltage-controlled electrical stimulation (CVCES) of titanium implants, either alone or combined with a short course of vancomycin, has previously been shown to reduce the bone and implant bacterial burden in a rodent model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) implant-associated infection (IAI). Clinically, the goal is to achieve complete eradication of the IAI; therefore, the rationale for the present study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effects of combining CVCES with prolonged antibiotic therapy with the goal of decreasing the colony-forming units (CFUs) to undetectable levels.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In an animal MRSA IAI model, does combining CVCES with prolonged vancomycin therapy decrease bacteria burden on the implant and surrounding bone to undetectable levels? (2) When used with prolonged vancomycin therapy, are two CVCES treatments more effective than one? (3) What are the longer term histologic effects (inflammation and granulation tissue) of CVCES on the surrounding tissue?

METHODS

Twenty adult male Long-Evans rats with surgically placed shoulder titanium implants were infected with a clinical strain of MRSA (NRS70). One week after infection, the rats were randomly divided into four groups of five: (1) VANCO: only vancomycin treatment (150 mg/kg, subcutaneous, twice daily for 5 weeks); (2) VANCO + 1STIM: vancomycin treatment (same as the VANCO group) coupled with one CVCES treatment (-1.8 V for 1 hour on postoperative day [POD] 7); (3) VANCO + 2STIM: vancomycin treatment (same as the VANCO group) coupled with two CVCES treatments (-1.8 V for 1 hour on POD 7 and POD 21); or (4) CONT: no treatment. On POD 42, the implant, bone, and peripheral blood were collected for CFU enumeration and histological analysis, where we compared CFU/mL on the implants and bone among the groups. A pathologist, blinded to the experimental conditions, performed a semiquantitative analysis of inflammation and granulation tissue present in serial sections of the humeral head for animals in each experimental group.

RESULTS

The VANCO + 1STIM decreased the implant bacterial burden (median = 0, range = 0-10 CFU/mL) when compared with CONT (median = 5.7 × 10(4), range = 4.0 × 10(3)-8.0 × 10(5) CFU/mL; difference of medians = -5.6 × 10(4); p < 0.001) and VANCO (median = 4.9 × 10(3), range = 9.0 × 10(2)-2.1 × 10(4) CFU/mL; difference of medians = -4.9 × 10(3); p < 0.001). The VANCO + 1STIM decreased the bone bacterial burden (median = 0, range = 0-0 CFU/mL) when compared with CONT (median = 1.3 × 10(2), range = 0-9.4 × 10(2) CFU/mL; difference of medians = -1.3 × 10(2); p < 0.001) but was not different from VANCO (median = 0, range = 0-1.3 × 10(2) CFU/mL; difference of medians = 0; p = 0.210). The VANCO + 2STIM group had implant CFU (median = 0, range = 0-8.0 × 10(1) CFU/mL) and bone CFU (median = 0, range = 0-2.0 × 10(1) CFU/mL) that were not different from the VANCO + 1STIM treatment group implant CFU (median = 0, range = 0-10 CFU/mL; difference of medians = 0; p = 0.334) and bone CFU (median = 0, range = 0-0 CFU/mL; difference of medians = 0; p = 0.473). The histological analysis showed no deleterious effects on the surrounding tissue as a result of the treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Using CVCES in combination with prolonged vancomycin resulted in decreased MRSA bacterial burden, and it may be beneficial in treating biofilm-related implant infections.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

CVCES combined with clinically relevant lengths of vancomycin therapy may be a treatment option for IAI and allow for component retention in certain clinical scenarios. However, more animal research and human trials confirming the efficacy of this approach are needed before such a clinical recommendation could be made.

Corrosion resistance improvement for 316L stainless steel coronary artery stents by trimethylsilane plasma nanocoatings

To improve their corrosion resistance and thus long-term biocompatibility, 316L stainless steel coronary artery stents were coated with trimethylsilane (TMS) plasma coatings of 20-25 nm in thickness. Both direct current (DC) and radio-frequency (RF) glow discharges were utilized for TMS plasma coatings and additional NH₃/O₂ plasma treatment to tailor the surface properties. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was used to characterize the coating surface chemistry. It was found that both DC and RF TMS plasma coatings had Si- and C-rich composition, and the O- and N-contents on the surfaces were substantially increased after NH₃/O₂ plasma treatment. Surface contact angle measurements showed that DC TMS plasma nanocoating with NH₃/O₂ plasma treatment generated very hydrophilic surface. The corrosion resistance of TMS plasma coated stents was evaluated through potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) techniques. The potentiodynamic polarization demonstrated that the TMS plasma coated stents imparted higher corrosion potential and pitting potential, as well as lower corrosion current densities as compared with uncoated controls. The surface morphology of stents before and after potentiodynamic polarization testing was analyzed with scanning electron microscopy, which indicated less corrosion on coated stents than uncoated controls. It was also noted that, from EIS data, the hydrophobic TMS plasma nanocoatings showed stable impedance modulus at 0.1 Hz after 21 day immersion in an electrolyte solution. These results suggest improved corrosion resistance of the 316L stainless steel stents by TMS plasma nanocoatings and great promise in reducing and blocking metallic ions releasing into the bloodstream.