Circulating Sclerostin Levels Are Positively Related to Coronary Artery Disease Severity and Related Risk Factors

Sclerostin and Cardiovascular Risk: Evaluating the Cardiovascular Safety of Romosozumab in Osteoporosis Treatment

Background/Objectives: Osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) share common risk factors and pathophysiological mechanisms, raising concerns about the cardiovascular implications of sclerostin inhibition. Romosozumab, a monoclonal antibody that targets sclerostin, is effective in increasing bone mineral density (BMD) and reducing fracture risk. However, evidence suggests that sclerostin inhibition may adversely affect vascular calcification, potentially increasing the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Methods: This review synthesizes data from clinical trials, such as ARCH, BRIDGE, and FRAME, alongside genetic studies and observational analyses, to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of romosozumab. PubMed was searched for relevant studies published within the last five years. Studies addressing the relationship between romosozumab and cardiovascular outcomes were included, emphasizing both its efficacy in osteoporosis management and potential cardiovascular risks. Results: Romosozumab significantly improves BMD and reduces fracture risk in postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis. However, clinical trials report an increased incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), particularly in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular conditions such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, or prior CVD. Genetic studies indicate that SOST gene variants may also influence cardiovascular outcomes. Conclusions: While romosozumab is an effective treatment for osteoporosis, careful cardiovascular risk assessment is crucial before initiating therapy, especially for high-risk populations. Long-term studies are needed to evaluate chronic safety. Future therapeutic strategies should aim to maintain bone health while minimizing cardiovascular risks, ensuring a balance between efficacy and safety in osteoporosis treatment.

Sclerostin as a new target of diabetes-induced osteoporosis

Sclerostin, a protein synthesized by bone cells, is a product of the SOST gene. Sclerostin is a potent soluble inhibitor of the WNT signaling pathway, and is known to inhibit bone formation by inhibiting osteocyte differentiation and function. Currently, sclerostin has been the subject of numerous animal experiments and clinical investigations. By conducting a literature review, we have gained insights into the most recent advancements in research. Patients with both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes have high levels of serum sclerostin. Patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes are both more likely to suffer from osteoporosis, and serum sclerostin levels are elevated in osteoporosis. Many studies have confirmed that sclerostin has been implicated in the pathogenesis of osteoporosis, so we speculate that sclerostin plays an important role in osteoporosis through the glucose metabolism pathway, which may promote the osteoporosis of morbidity in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Based on this, we propose whether serum sclerostin can predict type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes-induced osteoporosis, and whether it can be a new target for the prevention and treatment of type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes-induced osteoporosis, providing new ideas for clinicians and researchers.

Comparative effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab versus teriparatide in patients with osteoporosis: a population-based cohort study

This study compared the effectiveness and cardiovascular safety of romosozumab and teriparatide. The main finding was that there were no significant differences between the two drugs in fracture prevention and risk of major adverse cardiac events. This suggests that romosozumab and teriparatide are comparable options for treating osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the preventive effects of romosozumab versus teriparatide on fractures and the risk of cardiovascular events in patients initiating these drugs.

METHODS

We conducted an active comparator, a new user cohort design, with confounding controlled by inverse probability of treatment weighting using a Japanese administrative claims database (March 2019 to October 2022). This cohort study included 49,104 patients aged 50 years or older who initiated romosozumab (n = 16,125) or teriparatide (n = 32,979) for osteoporosis. The study exposure was the initiation of romosozumab or teriparatide. Effectiveness outcomes were nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture. The safety outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Follow-up period was 365 days.

RESULTS

The weighted incidence rate difference (IRD) for nonvertebral fracture between romosozumab versus teriparatide was -0.08 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.34 to 0.17) events per 100 person-years (weighted hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.81 to 1.12]); weighted IRD for hip fracture was 0.00 (95% CI, -0.16 to 0.16) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29]); and weighted IRD for MACE was -0.06 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.09) events per 100 person-years (weighted HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.19]).

CONCLUSION

In patients with osteoporosis, there was no significant difference in the prevention of nonvertebral fracture and hip fracture between romosozumab and teriparatide. In addition, the risk of MACE was comparable between the two drugs.

Effect of genetically predicted sclerostin on cardiovascular biomarkers, risk factors, and disease outcomes

Sclerostin inhibitors protect against osteoporotic fractures, but their cardiovascular safety remains unclear. We conducted a cis-Mendelian randomisation analysis to estimate the causal effect of sclerostin levels on cardiovascular risk factors. We meta-analysed three GWAS of sclerostin levels including 49,568 Europeans and selected 2 SNPs to be used as instruments. We included heel bone mineral density and hip fracture risk as positive control outcomes. Public GWAS and UK Biobank patient-level data were used for the study outcomes, which include cardiovascular events, risk factors, and biomarkers. Lower sclerostin levels were associated with higher bone mineral density and 85% reduction in hip fracture risk. However, genetically predicted lower sclerostin levels led to 25-85% excess coronary artery disease risk, 40% to 60% increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and worse cardiovascular biomarkers values, including higher triglycerides, and decreased HDL cholesterol levels. Results also suggest a potential (but borderline) association with increased risk of myocardial infarction. Our study provides genetic evidence of a causal relationship between reduced levels of sclerostin and improved bone health and fracture protection, but increased risk of cardiovascular events and risk factors.

Effects of tofacitinib on bone turnover markers and bone modulators in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is characterized by bone loss. It is unclear whether JAK inhibitors can attenuate bone loss in RA by modulating bone metabolism. The main objective of our study is to investigate the effects of tofacitinib on serum levels of bone turnover markers and modulators. Secondary objectives were to assess changes in bone mineral density (BMD), metacarpal index, bone erosions.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study on patients with active RA failure to bDMARDs or tsDMARDs initiating treatment with tofacitinib. We measured at baseline and after 1, 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months: serum bone turnover markers (CTX, P1nP, B-ALP), bone modulators (Dkk-1, sclerostin, vitamin D, PTH, OPG and RANKL), BMD and radiographic parameters (Sharp van der Heijde score [SvdH], bone health index [BHI] and metacarpal index [MCI]).

RESULTS

30 patients were enrolled in the study of whom 21 completed the study through month 12. Tofacitinib was clinically effective by suppressing DAS28-CRP. Glucocorticoids daily dose significantly decreased from baseline. We found a negative correlation between pre-study cumulative and daily dose of glucocorticoids and baseline B-ALP serum levels (r -0.592, p 0.012). Sclerostin serum levels increased significantly during the study period, while P1nP and B-ALP (markers of bone formation) decreased significantly. BMD levels, BHI, MCI and SvdH score did not change.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with tofacitinib was associated with a significant increase in sclerostin serum levels and a parallel decrease in markers of bone formation. However, no significant bone loss was observed.

Interrelationships among metabolic syndrome, bone-derived cytokines, and the most common metabolic syndrome-related diseases negatively affecting bone quality

Metabolic syndrome (MetS), as a set of medical conditions including hyperglycemia, hypertension, abdominal obesity, and dyslipidemia, represents a highly prevalent disease cluster worldwide. The individual components of MetS together increase the risk of MetS-related disorders. Recent research has demonstrated that bone, as an endocrine organ, releases several systemic cytokines (osteokines), including fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), lipocalin 2 (LCN2), and sclerostin (SCL). This review not only summarizes current knowledge about MetS, osteokines and the most common MetS-related diseases with a detrimental impact on bone quality (type 2 diabetes mellitus: T2DM; cardiovascular diseases: CVDs; osteoporosis: OP), but also provides new interpretations of the relationships between osteokines and individual components of MetS, as well as between osteokines and MetS-related diseases mentioned above. In this context, particular emphasis was given on available clinical studies. According to the latest knowledge, FGF23 may become a useful biomarker for obesity, T2DM, and CVDs, as FGF23 levels were increased in patients suffering from these diseases. LCN2 could serve as an indicator of obesity, dyslipidemia, T2DM, and CVDs. The levels of LCN2 positively correlated with obesity indicators, triglycerides, and negatively correlated with high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. Furthermore, subjects with T2DM and CVDs had higher LCN2 levels. SCL may act as a potential biomarker predicting the incidence of MetS including all its components, T2DM, CVDs, and OP. Elevated SCL levels were noted in individuals with T2DM, CVDs and reduced in patients with OP. The aforementioned bone-derived cytokines have the potential to serve as promising predictors and prospective treatment targets for MetS and MetS-related diseases negatively affecting bone quality.

Association between the atherogenic index of plasma and bone mineral density among adult women: NHANES (2011-2018)

Background

Studies on the relationship between the atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) and bone mineral density (BMD) among adult women in the United States are limited. The purpose of this study was to explore this association using a sizable, nationally representative sample.

Methods

Data from the 2011 to 2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used in this observational study. The AIP was computed as log10 (triglycerides/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol). Total BMD was measured via dual-energy X-ray densitometry. We constructed multiple linear regression models to evaluate the correlation between the AIP and BMD. The non-linear relationship was characterized by smooth curve fitting and generalized additive models. We also conducted subgroup and interaction analyses.

Results

In this study, we included 2,362 adult women with a mean age of 38.13 ± 12.42 years. The results of multiple linear regression analysis, the AIP and total BMD showed a negative association (β = -0.021, 95%CI: -0.037, -0.006). The curve fitting analysis and threshold effect analysis showed a non-linear relationship between the two variables, and the inflection point of the AIP was found to be -0.61. The total BMD decreased significantly when the AIP reached this value (β = -0.03, 95%CI: -0.04, -0.01). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that AIP and total BMD had a strong negative relationship in participants who were below 45 years old (β = -0.023; 95% CI: -0.041, -0.004), overweight (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) (β = -0.022; 95% CI: -0.041, -0.002), had a higher education level (β = -0.025; 95% CI: -0.044, -0.006), and had no partners (β = -0.014; 95% CI: -0.06, -0.009).

Conclusions

We found a negative correlation between the AIP and total BMD. Clinicians should pay attention to patients with high AIP, which might indicate a low BMD and has reference significance in preventing osteoporosis.

Sclerostin and Cardiovascular Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of wnt signalling in atherogenesis raises the possibility that the wnt inhibitor, sclerostin, provides a natural defence to this process, and that anti-sclerostin antibodies might increase the risk of atherosclerosis and associated conditions such as CVD. This article aims to triangulate evidence concerning possible adverse effects of sclerostin inhibition on CVD risk.

RECENT FINDINGS

Randomised controlled trials of treatment with the anti-sclerostin antibody, romosozumab, have yielded conflicting evidence with respect to possible adverse effects of sclerostin inhibition on CVD risk. To further examine the causal relationship between sclerostin inhibition and CVD risk, three Mendelian randomisation (MR) studies have examined effects of sclerostin lowering on CVD outcomes, using common genetic variants in the SOST gene which produces sclerostin, to mimic effects of a randomised trial. Concordant findings were seen in two studies, comprising an effect of sclerostin lowering on increased risk of MI and type II diabetes mellitus. One study also suggested that sclerostin lowering increases coronary artery calcification. Triangulation of evidence from different sources provides some suggestion that sclerostin lowering increases MI risk, supporting the need for CVD risk assessment when considering treatment with romosozumab.

Lowering of Circulating Sclerostin May Increase Risk of Atherosclerosis and Its Risk Factors: Evidence From a Genome-Wide Association Meta-Analysis Followed by Mendelian Randomization

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to establish the causal effects of lowering sclerostin, target of the antiosteoporosis drug romosozumab, on atherosclerosis and its risk factors.

METHODS

A genome-wide association study meta-analysis was performed of circulating sclerostin levels in 33,961 European individuals. Mendelian randomization (MR) was used to predict the causal effects of sclerostin lowering on 15 atherosclerosis-related diseases and risk factors.

RESULTS

We found that 18 conditionally independent variants were associated with circulating sclerostin. Of these, 1 cis signal in SOST and 3 trans signals in B4GALNT3, RIN3, and SERPINA1 regions showed directionally opposite signals for sclerostin levels and estimated bone mineral density. Variants with these 4 regions were selected as genetic instruments. MR using 5 correlated cis-SNPs suggested that lower sclerostin increased the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (odds ratio [OR] 1.32 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.03-1.69]) and myocardial infarction (MI) (OR 1.35 [95% CI 1.01-1.79]); sclerostin lowering was also suggested to increase the extent of coronary artery calcification (CAC) (β = 0.24 [95% CI 0.02-0.45]). MR using both cis and trans instruments suggested that lower sclerostin increased hypertension risk (OR 1.09 [95% CI 1.04-1.15]), but otherwise had attenuated effects.

CONCLUSION

This study provides genetic evidence to suggest that lower levels of sclerostin may increase the risk of hypertension, type 2 DM, MI, and the extent of CAC. Taken together, these findings underscore the requirement for strategies to mitigate potential adverse effects of romosozumab treatment on atherosclerosis and its related risk factors.

Early sclerostin assessment in frail elderly patients with sepsis: insights on short- and long-term mortality prediction

Unmet needs challenge clinical management of sepsis especially concerning patient profiling, enhancing recovery, and long-term sequelae. Here, we preliminarily focused on sclerostin (SOST) as a candidate biomarker to encompass such a broad range of clinical needs related to sepsis. Seventy-three septic patients were enrolled at internal medicine wards between January 2017 and December 2019 in this pilot study. Clinical examination and blood sample analyses were collected at enrollment and after 7 and 14 days. SOST levels were assessed on serum by ELISA. Thirty-day mortality was set as primary outcome. In-hospital and long-term mortality (2.5 years of median follow-up) were assessed as secondary outcomes. Patients were frail, elderly, and heterogeneous in terms of comorbidity burden. SOST levels were associated with age, cardiovascular comorbidities, and time to early death (30 days). When regression models were built, SOST displayed a high predictive value toward 30-day mortality (OR 13.459 with 95% CI 1.226-148.017) with ever better performance than validated scoring scales for critical ill patients. Such a predictive value of SOST was further confirmed for in-hospital (HR 10.089 with 95% CI 1.375-74.013) and long-term mortality (HR 5.061 with 95% CI 1.379-18.570). SOST levels generally decreased over 7 to 14 days after enrollment (p for trend < 0.001). The degree of this variation further predicted long-term mortality (HR for Δ SOST T0-day 14: 1.006 with 95% CI 1.001-1.011). Our results suggest a role for SOST in both short- and long-time prediction of worse outcome in septic elderly admitted to internal medicine wards.

Biochemical Markers of Bone Fragility in Patients with Diabetes. A Narrative Review by the IOF and the ECTS

CONTEXT

The risk of fragility fractures is increased in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Numerous biochemical markers reflecting bone and/or glucose metabolism have been evaluated in this context. This review summarizes current data on biochemical markers in relation to bone fragility and fracture risk in diabetes.

METHODS

Literature review by a group of experts from the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and European Calcified Tissue Society (ECTS) focusing on biochemical markers, diabetes, diabetes treatments and bone in adults.

RESULTS

Although bone resorption and bone formation markers are low and poorly predictive of fracture risk in diabetes, osteoporosis drugs seem to change bone turnover markers in diabetics similarly to non-diabetics, with similar reductions in fracture risk. Several other biochemical markers related to bone and glucose metabolism have been correlated with BMD and/or fracture risk in diabetes, including osteocyte-related markers such as sclerostin, HbA1c and advanced glycation end products (AGEs), inflammatory markers and adipokines, as well as IGF-1 and calciotropic hormones.

CONCLUSION

Several biochemical markers and hormonal levels related to bone and/or glucose metabolism have been associated with skeletal parameters in diabetes. Currently, only HbA1c levels seem to provide a reliable estimate of fracture risk, while bone turnover markers could be used to monitor the effects of anti-osteoporosis therapy.

Diabetes and bone

Globally, one in 11 adults has diabetes mellitus of which 90% have type 2 diabetes. The numbers for osteoporosis are no less staggering: 1 in 3 women has a fracture after menopause, and the same is true for 1 in 5 men after the age of 50 years. Aging is associated with several physiological changes that cause insulin resistance and impaired insulin secretion, which in turn lead to hyperglycemia. The negative balance between bone resorption and formation is a natural process that appears after the fourth decade of life and lasts for the following decades, eroding the bone structure and increasing the risk of fractures. Not incidentally, it has been acknowledged that diabetes mellitus, regardless of whether type 1 or 2, is associated with an increased risk of fracture. The nuances that differentiate bone damage in the two main forms of diabetes are part of the intrinsic heterogeneity of diabetes, which is enhanced when associated with a condition as complex as osteoporosis. This narrative review addresses the main parameters related to the increased risk of fractures in individuals with diabetes, and the mutual factors affecting the treatment of diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis.

The Dietary and Non-Dietary Management of Osteoporosis in Adult-Onset Celiac Disease: Current Status and Practical Guidance

Impaired bone mineral density (BMD) is a frequent complication of adult-onset celiac disease (CeD). This is usually due to malabsorption of nutrients, changes in bone metabolism in association with inflammation, and to a lesser extent, decreased overall physical health and mobility. This review aims to highlight the current status concerning surveillance, prevention, and treatment strategies for bone disease in CeD. A practical guidance on these matters is suggested. The available published research on the prevention and treatment of decreased BMD in relation to CeD is scarce. In general, publications were based on expert opinions or extrapolation from studies on postmenopausal women or inflammatory bowel disease. Optimal dietary treatment and an adequate supply of calcium and vitamin D are the cornerstones for the reduction in fracture risk in patients with CeD. In adults with low BMD or fragility fractures, CeD needs to be considered and specifically approached. When osteoporosis is documented, start treatment with an antiresorptive agent; these agents are proven to result in a long-term reduction in fracture risk in high-risk individuals. However, there are some important differences between the management of male and female patients, particularly premenopausal women, that need to be addressed. In patients with persisting diarrhea and malabsorption, parenteral medications may be preferable. Future research specifically focusing on celiac disease and the associated disorders in bone mineralization is mandatory to provide evidence-based recommendations in this field.