Cryoprecipitate poor plasma does not improve early response in primary adult thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP)

Comparing cryoprecipitate-poor plasma to fresh frozen plasma as replacement therapy in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: An updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cryoprecipitate-poor plasma (CPP) has been suggested as a promising alternative to the standard fresh frozen plasma (FFP) in plasma exchange therapy (TPE) for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) given its lower concentrations of von Willebrand Factor (VWF). However, its efficacy and safety remain a topic of debate.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CPP to FFP during TPE in patients with TTP. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central were systematically searched for studies reporting outcomes of all-cause mortality, relapse rate, response to treatment, and the mean number of TPE sessions. Sensitivity analyses restricted to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were performed. Review Manager v5.4 and RStudio v4.1.2 were used for statistical analysis. The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (ID CRD42023440665).

RESULTS

Eight studies, including three RCTs and five non-randomized studies, met the eligibility criteria. A total of 290 patients with TTP were included, of whom 144 (49.7 %) received CPP and 146 (50.3 %) received FFP. Use of CPP was associated with lower mortality (RR 0.41; 95 % CI 0.23-0.72; p = 0.002; I²=0 %), while the subgroup analysis restricted to RCTs showed no statistical difference between groups (p = 0.36). No significant differences were found in relapse rate, response to treatment, or mean number of TPE sessions between groups.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that the use of CPP is not inferior to FFP in TPE. Given the limited population, future clinical trials are needed to elucidate its benefits compared to FFP in patients with TTP.

Therapeutic modalities in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura management among Jehovah's Witness patients: A review of reported cases

INTRODUCTION

Devout members of the Jehovah's Witness faith flatly refuse transfusions of white blood cells, red blood cells, platelets, and plasma. The latter agent is a mainstay in the treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). Alternative treatment options for Jehovah's Witness patients are needed and reviewed herein.

METHODS

Cases of TTP treatment among Jehovah's Witnesses were obtained from the published literature. Key baseline and clinical data were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

A total of 13 reports spanning a 23-year period and 15 TTP episodes were identified. Median (IQR) age was 45.5 (29.0-57.5) and 12/13 (93%) patients were female. Neurologic symptoms were present in 7/15 (47%) episodes at presentation. Disease confirmation with ADAMTS13 testing was present in 11/15 (73%) of episodes. Corticosteroids and rituximab were employed in 13/15 (87%) and 12/15 (80%) of cases, respectively, with apheresis-based therapy employed in 9/15 (60%) episodes. For eligible cases, caplacizumab was used in 4/5 (80%) episodes; average time to platelet response was shortest in these cases. Sources of exogenous ADAMTS13 accepted by patients in this series included cryo-poor plasma, FVIII concentrate, and cryoprecipitate.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful management of TTP within the boundaries of the Jehovah's Witness faith is possible.

Role of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of pediatric kidney diseases

Therapeutic apheresis utilizes apheresis procedures in the treatment of a variety of conditions including kidney disease. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the most common modality employed with the rationale of rapid reduction of a pathogenic substance distributed primarily in the intravascular compartment; however other techniques which adsorb such pathogenic substances or alter the immune profile have been utilized in diseases affecting native and transplanted kidneys. This article discusses the modalities and technical details of therapeutic apheresis and summarizes its role in individual diseases affecting the kidney. Complications related to pediatric apheresis procedures and specifically related to apheresis in kidney disease are also discussed. Though therapeutic apheresis modalities are employed frequently in children with kidney disease, most experiences are extrapolated from adult studies. International and national registries need to be established to elucidate the role of apheresis modalities in children with kidney disease.

Is Cryoprecipitate-Reduced Plasma an Efficacious Replacement Fluid for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange for Patients with Thrombotic Microangiopathy? A Single-Center Retrospective Experience

OBJECTIVE

We designed a study to compare the efficacy of cryoprecipitate-reduced plasma (CRP) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP), at the level of individual sessions, for treating refractory thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Platelet counts (× 10³/μL) and lactate dehydrogenase (LD; IU/L) levels were measured before and after each session. We compared the mean-percentage and absolute changes in platelet count and LD after each TPE session.

RESULTS

The data from 33 patients treated for TMA between 2009 and 2018 were collected for this study. Both absolute and percentage increases in the platelet count were statistically significant (P = .003 and P = .011, respectively) when CRP was used. However, when patients were divided into subgroups according to specific diagnosis, no significant differences were found among the groups, except in terms of the absolute platelet count increase in the thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura group (P <.001).

CONCLUSION

The platelet count increase was higher when patients received CRP than when they received FFP. We found that CRP may be a rescue option for patients with refractory TMA.

Best practices and recommendations for drug regimens and plasma exchange for immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ injury. TTP pathophysiology is based on a severe ADAMTS13 deficiency, and is a medical emergency with fatal outcome if appropriate treatment is not initiated promptly.

AREAS COVERED

Authors will review the best options currently available to minimize mortality, prevent relapses, and obtain the best clinical response in patients with immune TTP (iTTP). Available bibliography about iTTP treatment has been searched in Library's MEDLINE/PubMed database from January 1990 until April 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

The generalized use of plasma exchange marked a paradigm in the management of iTTP. In recent years, strenuous efforts have been done for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of this disease, improve diagnosis, optimize treatment, reduce mortality, and prevent recurrences. The administration of front-line rituximab and, more recently, the availability of caplacizumab, the first targeted therapy for iTTP, have been steps toward a further reduction in early mortality and for the prevention of relapses.

[Treatment of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura]

The review discusses approaches to treatment of acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpuгa (aTTP). In patients with aTTP plasma exchanges, glucocorticosteroids allow to stop an acute attack of TTP, and use of rituximab allows to achieve remission. In recent years, caplacizumab has been used. Treatment options such as cyclosporin A, bortezomib, splenectomy, N-acetylcysteine, recombinant ADAMTS13 are also described. Separately discussed issues of management of patients with TTP during pregnancy, and pediatric patients with TTP.

Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and ischemic end organ injury due to microvascular platelet-rich thrombi. TTP results from a severe deficiency of the specific von Willebrand factor (VWF)-cleaving protease, ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13). ADAMTS13 deficiency is most commonly acquired due to anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. It can also be inherited in the congenital form as a result of biallelic mutations in the ADAMTS13 gene. In adults, the condition is most often immune-mediated (iTTP) whereas congenital TTP (cTTP) is often detected in childhood or during pregnancy. iTTP occurs more often in women and is potentially lethal without prompt recognition and treatment. Front-line therapy includes daily plasma exchange with fresh frozen plasma replacement and immunosuppression with corticosteroids. Immunosuppression targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies with the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab is frequently added to the initial therapy. If available, anti-VWF therapy with caplacizumab is also added to the front-line setting. While it is hypothesized that refractory TTP will be less common in the era of caplacizumab, in relapsed or refractory cases cyclosporine A, N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or splenectomy can be considered. Novel agents, such as recombinant ADAMTS13, are also currently under investigation and show promise for the treatment of TTP. Long-term follow-up after the acute episode is critical to monitor for relapse and to diagnose and manage chronic sequelae of this disease.

Efficacy of albumin and compounded plasma for plasma exchange in acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the first-line treatment for TTP. In our institution, albumin plus plasma (fresh frozen plasma [FFP] and/or cryoprecipitate-reduced plasma [CRP]) has been used as replacement fluid since 2014. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of albumin combined with plasma as TPE for TTP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 20 patients admitted to our institution due to an acute episode of TTP between January 1, 2014 and February 1, 2019. They were divided into two groups according to the replacement fluid protocols: (a) albumin plus FFP (1:1) and (b) albumin plus mixed plasma [ie, albumin and FFP with CRP (2:1:1)] groups. Data on patient characteristics, replacement parameters, outcome, and hemorrhage risk were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in treatment outcomes between the two groups (P > .05). However, the albumin plus mixed plasma group tended to require fewer plasma exchanges (median, 4) and shorter time to response (median, 15 days) compared to albumin plus FFP group (median, 6; 31 days). Although the cumulative survival of the albumin plus mixed plasma group was higher than the other group starting from day 23 after treatment, we did not observe significant difference (P = .50). No significant increase in the risk for hemorrhage was observed in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic efficacy of albumin and mixed plasma (2:1:1) is not inferior to that of albumin and FFP (1:1), and it can be used in treating TTP.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a life-threatening disease related to the formation of microvascular thrombosis and subsequent organ failure. The disease is accompanied with microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, consumptive thrombocytopenia and lies on a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13, the von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. In the acquired, immune-mediated form, this deficiency is due to the production of autoantibodies directed against the enzyme. Therapeutic plasma exchange has been used empirically for decades and still represents the cornerstone of TTP treatment. However, a better understanding of pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the disease has led these last years to the development of highly effective targeted therapies that might in the future restraint the use of therapeutic plasma exchange.

Developments in the use of plasma exchange and adjunctive therapies to treat immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Introduction: Immune-mediated thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP) is a life-threatening disease characterized by a severe functional deficit in the von-Willebrand cleaving protease ADAMTS13, due to autoantibody production. The once-dismal prognosis of the disease has been changed by the discovery of the dramatic efficiency of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). Areas covered: This review focuses on the history and recent developments in the use of TPE for iTTP with a special emphasis on the consequences for TPE practice of the recent introduction of new highly effective immunosuppressive strategies and anti-von Willebrand factor (vWF) therapies. Expert opinion: Although TPE still represents the cornerstone, emergency treatment of iTTP, their duration, and associated complications could be dramatically reduced in the future by the systematic addition of early immunosuppression using corticosteroids and rituximab as well as an anti-vWF therapy with caplacizumab.

Combination of Fresh Frozen Plasma and Cryosupernatant Plasma for Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Single Institution Experience

Purpose

To evaluate the impact of a combination of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and cryosupernatant plasma (CP) as a replacement fluid in therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on early therapeutic response and long-term survival of patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP).

Materials and Methods

A total of 44 patients with suspected TTP were screened by Bentley and PLASMIC scores. Twenty-seven patients treated with TPE using the FFP and CP combination as the replacement fluid were enrolled and divided into two groups: 11 patients who received TPE with CP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP<1) and 16 patients who received TPE with FFP-dominant replacement fluid (FFP/CP>1).

Results

There were no significant differences in the demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the two groups except for the international normalized ratio (INR). The number of TPE procedures was lower, and time to achieve complete response was shorter in the CP-dominant group than in the FFP-dominant group. There were no significant differences in overall survival between the two groups.

Conclusion

The CP-dominant replacement fluid was superior to the FFP-dominant replacement fluid in early response to TPE in patients with TTP, but did not impact the patients' overall survival.

Successful Management of Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura in a Jehovah's Witness: An Individualized Approach With Joint Decision-Making

The management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) presents a unique challenge in individuals who are unable to accept plasma due to religious beliefs, given that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the standard of care. A 61-year-old Jehovah’s Witness woman presented to our hospital with neurological symptoms and laboratory findings suggestive of TTP. On admission, she refused transfusion of blood products, specifically red blood cells, platelets, and plasma but accepted albumin and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG); fractions of plasma. She was started on steroids, IVIG, and TPE with albumin as replacement therapy with minimal improvement. After a detailed discussion with the patient and family, they agreed to accept cryosupernatant. The patient started TPE with cryosupernatant for replacement therapy, which resulted in clinical improvement. This case highlights the importance of an individualized approach with joint decision-making given the significant heterogeneity that exists in Jehovah’s Witnesses’ attitude toward the receipt of blood products.

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare and life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, severe thrombocytopenia, and organ ischemia linked to disseminated microvascular platelet rich-thrombi. TTP is specifically related to a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloprotease with thrombospondin type 1 repeats, member 13), the specific von Willebrand factor-cleaving protease. ADAMTS13 deficiency is most frequently acquired via ADAMTS13 autoantibodies, but rarely, it is inherited via mutations of the ADAMTS13 gene. The first acute episode of TTP usually occurs during adulthood, with a predominant anti-ADAMTS13 autoimmune etiology. In rare cases, however, TTP begins as soon as childhood, with frequent inherited forms. TTP is ∼2-fold more frequent in women, and its outcome is characterized by a relapsing tendency. Rapid recognition of TTP is crucial to initiate appropriate treatment. The first-line therapy for acute TTP is based on daily therapeutic plasma exchange supplying deficient ADAMTS13, with or without steroids. Additional immune modulators targeting ADAMTS13 autoantibodies are mainly based on steroids and the humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab. In refractory or unresponsive TTP, more intensive therapies including twice-daily plasma exchange; pulses of cyclophosphamide, vincristine, or cyclosporine A; or salvage splenectomy are considered. New drugs including N-acetylcysteine, bortezomib, recombinant ADAMTS13, and caplacizumab show promise in the management of TTP. Also, long-term follow-up of patients with TTP is crucial to identify the occurrence of other autoimmune diseases, to control relapses, and to evaluate psychophysical sequelae. Further development of both patients’ registries worldwide and innovative drugs is still needed to improve TTP management.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice-Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Seventh Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Thrombotic Microangiopathy Care Pathway: A Consensus Statement for the Mayo Clinic Complement Alternative Pathway-Thrombotic Microangiopathy (CAP-TMA) Disease-Oriented Group

Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs) comprise a heterogeneous set of conditions linked by a common histopathologic finding of endothelial damage resulting in microvascular thromboses and potentially serious complications. The typical clinical presentation is microangiopathic hemolytic anemia accompanied by thrombocytopenia with varying degrees of organ ischemia. The differential diagnoses are generally broad, while the workup is frequently complex and can be confusing. This statement represents the joint recommendations from a multidisciplinary team of Mayo Clinic physicians specializing in the management of TMA. It comprises a series of evidence- and consensus-based clinical pathways developed to allow a uniform approach to the spectrum of care including when to suspect TMA, what differential diagnoses to consider, which diagnostic tests to order, and how to provide initial empiric therapy, as well as some guidance on subsequent management.

How we treat thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: Results of a Canadian TTP practice survey

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare disease with 90% mortality if untreated. Since the Canadian Apheresis Group (CAG) trial showed greater survival with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) versus plasma infusion, there has been widespread adoption of TPE. Beyond TPE, there is significant practice variation. To characterize this, we developed a survey sent to physicians who might be directly involved in TTP management.

METHODS

The survey was sent to CAG members as well as hematologists and nephrologists nationwide and addressed areas of controversy or recognized practice heterogeneity. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize responses, and the χ² test was used to compare respondents who were and were not CAG physicians. We also compared responses by estimated frequency of TTP cases per year.

RESULTS

The CAG response rate was 31% (13 of 42). The survey was sent to 665 non-CAG physicians, of whom 41 responded (6.1%). Though not statistically different, CAG and non-CAG respondents varied regarding use of corticosteroids, aspirin, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis. Significant differences were found between CAG and non-CAG groups regarding cryosupernatant as fluid choice (69.2% vs. 22.5%, P = .004) and the use of TPE tapering (84.6% vs. 51.3%, P = .034), respectively.

CONCLUSION

TTP treatment is variable across centres in Canada. Areas of significant variation include the choice of replacement fluid for TPE and whether or not and how to taper TPE. Our survey highlights the practice heterogeneity that exists and identifies areas where more evidence is needed and perhaps where trials should be performed.

Evaluation and Management of Patients With Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) describes syndromes with multiple etiologies, some of which are rapidly fatal without plasma exchange treatment. Although there have been advances in understanding the pathogenesis of TTP, evaluation and management remain difficult because there are no specific diagnostic criteria, as TTP can be clinically similar to other acute disorders, such as sepsis, disseminated malignancy, malignant hypertension, and preeclampsia, and because urgent treatment is required. An unexpected observation of anemia and thrombocytopenia should trigger consideration of TTP; evidence that the anemia is due to microangiopathic hemolysis, suggested by the presence of red cell fragmentation on the blood smear, supports the diagnosis. When the diagnostic criteria of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia without an apparent alternative etiology are fulfilled, plasma exchange treatment is appropriate. However, plasma exchange has risks for severe complications and death; therefore, this management decision must be balanced against the confidence in the diagnosis. With plasma exchange treatment, approximately 80% of patients survive, in contrast to only 10% in the era prior to the availability of plasma exchange. The continuing mortality from TTP, the risks of plasma exchange treatment, and the potential for recurrent episodes of TTP are clinical challenges that remain to be solved.

Thrombocytopenia in Critical Care Patients

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory finding in the intensive care unit (ICU) patient. Because the causes can range from laboratory artifact to life-threatening processes such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), identifying the cause of thrombocytopenia is important. In the evaluation of the thrombocytopenia patient, one should incorporate all clinical clues such as why the patient is in the hospital, medications the patient is on, and other abnormal laboratory findings. One should ensure that the patient does not suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or one of the thrombotic microangiopathies (TMs). HIT can present in any patient on heparin and requires specific testing and antithrombotic therapy. TMs cover a spectrum of disease ranging from TTP to pregnancy complications and can have a variety of presentations. Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation depends on the patient’s condition and complication. Other causes of ICU thrombocytopenia include sepsis, medication side effects, post-transfusion purpura, catastrophic anti phospholipid antibody disease, and immune thrombocytopenia.

Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemias with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange: When It Works and When It Does Not

Thrombotic microangiopathies are a heterogeneous group of inherited and acquired disorders sharing a common clinical presentation of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ damage. These disorders have been treated with plasma exchange (TPE) based on randomized controlled trials, which found this therapy to be effective in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). For the remaining disorders, low- to very low-quality evidence exists for the use of TPE. When TPE is applied, the treatment regimen used for TTP is usually applied. There is a need for further evaluation of the role of TPE in the treatment of thrombotic microangiopathies other than TTP.

To treat or not to treat: a rare case of pseudo-thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in a Jehovah's Witness

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare microvascular occlusive disorder characterized by systemic intravascular aggregation of platelets, thrombocytopenia, and mechanical injury to red blood cells. We report a rare case of pernicious anemia presenting as TTP in a Jehovah's Witness.

CASE REPORT

A 46-year-old Jehovah's Witness female presented with epigastric pain, vomiting, and diarrhea for 2 days and fatigue and paresthesias for 4 weeks. Initial laboratory evaluation showed severe anemia and thrombocytopenia with elevated total bilirubin and lactate dehydrogenase. Peripheral blood smear showed schistocytes, macroovalocytes, and hypersegmented neutrophils. TTP was suspected and plasmapheresis was offered. The patient refused it due to her religious beliefs. Due to the presence of macroovalocytes and hypersegmented neutrophils, vitamin B12 level was checked and found to be extremely low. Anti-intrinsic factor antibodies and anti-parietal cell antibodies were also positive; hence a diagnosis of pernicious anemia was established. Treatment with intramuscular vitamin B12 was initiated, which resulted in dramatic neurologic and hematologic improvement.

DISCUSSION

Vitamin B12 deficiency can lead to elevated levels of homocysteine in the blood. Homocysteine can cause endothelial dysfunction, which can lead to formation of microvascular thrombi. Due to this phenomenon, vitamin B12 deficiency can rarely present with schistocytes and thrombocytopenia, which combined with other stigmata of vitamin B12 deficiency, can be misdiagnosed as TTP.

Safety and efficacy of cryoprecipitate-poor plasma as a replacement fluid for therapeutic plasma exchange in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: a single center retrospective evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a thrombotic microangiopathy caused by decreased activity of ADAMTS13, resulting in reduced clearance of ultralarge von Willebrand factor (VWF) multimers. Treatment of TTP is therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) with replacement with fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Cryoprecipitate-poor plasma (CPP) is a plasma product with lower concentrations of large VWF multimers, and similar amounts of ADAMTS13. CPP is regarded as at least as efficacious as FFP in TTP but evidence of additional benefits has not been demonstrated. Furthermore, there are limited data on the frequency of adverse events associated with CPP.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In our center, the choice between CPP and FFP is performed before the 1st TPE session at the physicians' discretion. Here, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of CPP based on the number of sessions, volume of plasma exposure, frequency of exacerbations/relapses, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with newly diagnosed TTP were included in this analysis. The proportion of CPP:FFP use was 5:9. There were no significant differences in age, gender, initial hemoglobin, platelet count, LDH, or etiology of TTP between groups. We observed a trend toward a higher number of TPE sessions and higher plasma exposure in CPP, compared to FFP-treated patients. Acute exacerbations were more frequent among patients treated with CPP (OR 26.6; 95%CI 1.01-703.51; P = 0.03). Mild allergic reactions were the most common treatment-related adverse event in both groups.

DISCUSSION

Our data suggest that CPP should not be used as 1st line treatment for newly diagnosed TTP patients.

Management of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura: current perspectives

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare, life-threatening thrombotic microangiopathy which causes significant morbidity and mortality unless promptly recognized and treated. The underlying pathogenesis of TTP is a severe deficiency in ADAMTS13 activity, a metalloprotease that cleaves ultralarge von Willebrand factor multimers. This deficiency is either autoantibody mediated (acquired TTP) or due to deleterious mutations in the gene encoding ADAMTS13 (congenital TTP). The elucidation of this disease mechanism has reinforced the rationale and place of current therapies (eg, plasma exchange) as well as providing a basis for the prospective evaluation of immunotherapy with rituximab in addition to classic immunosuppression (eg, corticosteroid) in autoantibody-mediated TTP. This review discusses the current evidence base for therapeutic interventions in acquired and congenital TTP as well as providing a practical approach to the other aspects of investigation and management for which a firm evidence base is lacking. Novel agents that are currently being evaluated in prospective trials and future directions of therapy are also discussed which are expected to make an important contribution to improving outcomes in patients with TTP.

ADAMTS13 unbound to larger von Willebrand factor multimers in cryosupernatant: implications for selection of plasma preparations for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura treatment

BACKGROUND

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is characterized by deficient ADAMTS13 activity. Treatment involves plasma exchange (PE). Both fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) and cryosupernatant (CSP) are used, but it remains to be determined which is more effective.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

To analyze the interaction between von Willebrand factor (VWF) and ADAMTS13, we used large-pore isoelectric focusing (IEF) analysis followed by detection with anti-ADAMTS13 monoclonal antibody. FFP, CSP, cryoprecipitate (CP), and purified ADAMTS13 were analyzed for their effects on high shear stress-induced platelet aggregation (H-SIPA).

RESULTS

IEF analysis of normal plasma revealed three groups of ADAMTS13 bands with pI of 4.9 to 5.6, 5.8 to 6.7, and 7.0 or 7.5. Two band groups (pI 4.9-5.6 and 5.8-6.7) were found in plasma of a patient with Type 3 von Willebrand disease, in which VWF is absent, whereas no bands were found in plasma of a patient with congenital ADAMTS13 deficiency. Mixing these plasmas generated the bands at pI 7.0 or 7.5, representing the VWF-ADAMTS13 complex; these bands were absent in CSP. FFP and purified ADAMTS13 down regulated H-SIPA in a dose-dependent manner. However, CP did not inhibit H-SIPA in the initial phase, and the degree of inhibition at the endpoint was almost indistinguishable from those of the other two plasma products.

CONCLUSION

Both plasma products (FFP and CSP) are effective for PE in TTP patients. However, CSP may be more favorable, because it has lower levels of VWF and almost normal ADAMTS13 activity, but lower levels of ADAMTS13 in complex with larger VWF multimers.

Microangiopathic disorders in pregnancy

Microangiopathic disorders present with thrombocytopenia, hemolytic anemia, and multiorgan damage. In pregnancy, these disorders present a challenge both diagnostically and therapeutically, with widely overlapping clinical scenarios and disparate treatments. Although rare, a clear understanding of these diseases is important because devastating maternal and fetal outcomes may ensue if there is misdiagnosis and improper treatment. Microangiopathic disorders presenting in pregnancy are thus best assessed and treated by both obstetric and hematology teams. As a better understanding of the pathophysiology underlying each of the disease processes is gained, new diagnostic testing and therapies will be available, which will lead to improved outcomes.

Microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia resembling thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of ADAMTS13

Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare but frequently fatal complication of SLE. It occurs in the context of both active and inactive lupus and carries a worse overall prognosis than idiopathic acquired TTP. Recent advances in the knowledge and treatment of TTP do not seem to have brought similar improvements in the management and outcome of TTP in SLE. The illumination of the role of the von Willebrand factor multimer protease, ADAMTS13 in idiopathic TTP continues to enhance our comprehension of the pathogenesis of the disease and has contributed to improvements in diagnosis and management. We explore the overlap of TTP and SLE, and discuss the current understanding of the involvement of ADAMTS13 and its implications for patients with this uncommon form of microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia.

Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice--evidence-based approach from the Apheresis Applications Committee of the American Society for Apheresis

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Apheresis Applications Committee is charged with a review and categorization of indications for therapeutic apheresis. Beginning with the 2007 ASFA Special Issue (fourth edition), the subcommittee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approach in the grading and categorization of indications. This Fifth ASFA Special Issue has further improved the process of using evidence-based medicine in the recommendations by refining the category definitions and by adding a grade of recommendation based on widely accepted GRADE system. The concept of a fact sheet was introduced in the Fourth edition and is only slightly modified in this current edition. The fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis. The article consists of 59 fact sheets devoted to each disease entity currently categorized by the ASFA as category I through III. Category IV indications are also listed.

Analysis of the products of cryoprecipitation: RiCoF is deficient in cryosupernatant plasma

INTRODUCTION

Cryoprecipitate and its byproduct, cryosupernatant plasma (CSP) have been used to treat specific medical diseases such as hemophilia, von Willebrand disease and thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura. Cryoprecipitate is also widely used to prepare fibrin glue. In many instances, it is given to augment fresh frozen plasma when patients are bleeding. However, the full range of constituents of cryoprecipitate and CSP are not widely appreciated.

METHODS

To determine the concentration of the various constituents in plasma and its frozen fractions, we measured levels of Factor VIII, von Willebrand factor antigen, fibrinogen, Factor V, ATIII, functional and antigenic proteins C and S, plasminogen, Total protein, fibronectin, Factor XIII, RiCoF and von Willebrand factor multimers in the starting plasma, the cryoprecipitate and the CSP produced from the plasma in each of the blood groups.

RESULTS

While only 4% of the plasma proteins cryoprecipitate, there is considerable enrichment of Factor VIII, von Willebrand factor and RiCoF. However, cryoprecipitate contains only 27% of the plasma fibrinogen and has low levels of Factor V, protein S, protein C, ATIII and plasminogen. Factor VIII and von Willebrand factor are much reduced in the cryosupernatant plasma (0.20 U/ml and 0.16 U/ml) and there is virtually no ristocetin cofactor activity. This is consistent with the absence of the higher molecular weight multimers of VWF found in CSP. The ADAMTS-13 levels are the same as in plasma. All levels vary between blood groups.

CONCLUSIONS

While cryoprecipitate is relatively enriched in certain factors, the process does not result in concentration of other coagulation factors so cryoprecipitate cannot be used for the replacement of protein C, protein S or Factor V. SCP is deficient in RiCoF.

Efficacy and Safety Profile of Solvent/Detergent Plasma in the Treatment of Acute Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is a rare clinical disorder which was associated with poor prognosis for a long time. The outcome has been improved by the consistent introduction of thera-peutic plasma exchange (TPE) as standard treatment of TTP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We describe our experience in the use of solvent/detergent-treated plasma (SDP) for TPE in TTP. We retrospectively analyzed acute TTP epi-sodes in 8 patients (mean age = 27 years, range 18-44 years) treated with TPE using SDP with regard to tolerability and efficacy. RESULTS: All 8 patients were positive for anti-ADAMTS-13 antibody. Seven out of 8 had a se-vere ADAMTS-13 deficiency. All patients responded rapidly to SDP TPE with an increase in platelet count to above 150 x 10(9)/l. Hemolytic anemia disappeared over the treatment period. Approximately 2,000 l SDP were used for more than 500 treatments. Treatment with SDP was well tolerated; none of the patients experienced an adverse drug reaction after exposure to SDP. No major complications occurred even after multiple TPE. CONCLUSION: Our investigations suggest that TPE using SDP as replacement fluid is an effective treatment for TTP. The data described also indicate that SDP might offer the benefit of reducing adverse drug reactions.

Mechanisms of microvascular thrombosis in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

Recent studies have demonstrated that thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), a serious thrombotic disorder affecting the arterioles and capillaries of multiple organs, is caused by a profound deficiency in the von Willebrand factor cleaving metalloprotease, ADAMTS13. ADAMTS13, a 190-kD plasma protease originating primarily in hepatic stellate cells, prevents microvascular thrombosis by cleaving von Willebrand factor when the substrate is conformationally unfolded by high levels of shear stress in the circulation. Deficiency of ADAMTS13, due to genetic mutations or inhibitory autoantibodies, leads to accumulation of superactive forms of vWF, resulting in vWF-platelet aggregation and microvascular thrombosis. Analysis of ADAMTS13 has led to the recognition of subclinical TTP and atypical TTP presenting with thrombocytopenia or acute focal neurological deficits without concurrent microangiopathic hemolysis. Infusion of plasma replenishes the missing ADAMTS13 and ameliorates the complications of hereditary TTP. The patients are at risk of both acute and chronic renal failure if they receive inadequate plasma therapy. The more frequent, autoimmune type of TTP requires plasma exchange therapy and perhaps immunomodulatory measures. Current studies focus on the factors affecting the phenotypic severity of TTP and newer approaches to improving the therapies for the patients.

Interventions for haemolytic uraemic syndrome and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura

BACKGROUND

Haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) are related conditions with similar clinical features of variable severity. Survival of patients with HUS and TTP has improved greatly over the past two decades with improved supportive care for patients with HUS and by the use of plasma exchange (PE) with fresh frozen plasma (FFP) for patients with TTP. Separate pathogenesis of these two disorders has become more evident, but management overlaps.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of different interventions for HUS and TTP separately, in patients of all ages.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), conference proceedings, reference lists of articles and text books and contact with investigators were used to identify relevant studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any interventions for HUS or TTP in patients of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data and evaluated study reporting quality using standard Cochrane criteria. Analysis was undertaken using a random effects model and results expressed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

MAIN RESULTS

For TTP, we found six RCTs (331 participants) evaluating PE with FFP as the control. Interventions tested included antiplatelet therapy (APT) plus PE with FFP, FFP transfusion and PE with cryosupernatant plasma (CSP). Two studies compared plasma infusion (PI) to PE with FFP and showed a significant increase in failure of remission at two weeks (RR 1.48, 95% 1.12 to 1.96) and all-cause mortality (RR 1.91, 95% 1.09 to 3.33) in the PI group. Seven RCTs were undertaken in children with HUS. None of the assessed interventions used (FFP transfusion, heparin with or without urokinase or dipyridamole, shiga toxin binding protein and steroids) were superior to supportive therapy alone, for all-cause mortality, neurological/extrarenal events, renal biopsy changes, proteinuria or hypertension at the last follow-up visit. Bleeding was significantly higher in those receiving anticoagulation therapy compared to supportive therapy alone (RR 25.89, 95% CI 3.67 to 182.83).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

PE with FFP is still the most effective treatment available for TTP. For patients with HUS, supportive therapy including dialysis is still the most effective treatment. All studies in HUS have been conducted in the diarrhoeal form of the disease. There were no RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of any interventions on patients with atypical HUS who have a more chronic and relapsing course.